Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #570021 > unrolled thread

Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon

Started byFred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com>
First post2016-04-12 15:34 -0700
Last post2016-04-15 21:39 +0000
Articles 18 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:34 -0700
    Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 23:15 +0000
      Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 17:36 -0700
        Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-12 21:10 -0500
      Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 22:18 -0700
        Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 18:07 +0000
          Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 13:01 -0700
            Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:39 +0000
              Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 19:22 -0700
                Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 04:08 +0000
                  Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 00:49 -0700
                    Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:10 +0000
                      Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 14:39 -0700
                        Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:30 +0000
                          Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 17:07 -0700
                            Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:34 +0000
                              Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 19:21 -0700
                                Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:39 +0000

#570021 — Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon

FromFred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-12 15:34 -0700
SubjectRe: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon
Message-ID<ustqgbt6gr8nfio2kpp2q1itcea66i47u9@4ax.com>
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>> newsreader.
>>>
>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>
>> 
>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>
> 
>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>

You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?


-- 
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
 territory."
                                      --G. Behn

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#570037

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-04-12 23:15 +0000
Message-ID<66c0uc-ndh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#570021
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>
>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>
>> 
>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>
> 
> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
 
The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
to be ASCII text.

How do you know everyone can read it fine?

Have you taken a poll and separated that out to those using a browser
and those using a real newsreader?
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570046

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-12 17:36 -0700
Message-ID<d30ff7d3-5a8b-4a62-922e-6d2372b8941c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#570037
where did they drop you\
still nOOd?

> Have you taken a poll and separated that out to those using a browser
> and those using a real newsreader?
>  
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570068

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-04-12 21:10 -0500
Message-ID<nek9rv$1p7r$5@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#570046
On 4/12/2016 7:36 PM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> where did they drop you\
> still nOOd?
>
>> Have you taken a poll and separated that out to those using a browser
>> and those using a real newsreader?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
>




 >>> Oven.  Whatever is needed.  Oven.  Whatever it needs to.

no answer ?    try to think it through.

          man needs 500 liters of O2 per day
     there are 10 men up there, 2 are needed to run the O2 plant, and 2 
are needed to run the Water plant, and 2 are needed to run the N2 plant.

so your O2 flow rate is 5,000 liters per day,
your N2 flow rate is 15,000 liters per day (assume a 25% O2)
and about 7.5 liters of water per day per person

so how many tons rocks do you cook per day ?
How much energy is needed to run the rock cooking plant?
What type of rocks work for O2 that are on the surface ?

where do you get  24 liters of water per day ? (assume a 25% recapture rate)

Biofilm questions: where does the lost water go? will the biofilm cause 
dammage to the electronics?  How much energy is used to keep the 
Humidity down to below 70% ?

how do you reprocess the salt bath used for cooking the rocks ?

What rocks do you cook to get N2 ???

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570097

FromFred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-12 22:18 -0700
Message-ID<57lrgbt0iuir5tetukdvfguv5ikvjlkcuv@4ax.com>
In reply to#570037
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>
>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>
>>> 
>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>
>> 
>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>
> 
>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>to be ASCII text.
>

I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
render a character correctly.

>
>How do you know everyone can read it fine?
>

Because no one is complaining but you.

>
>Have you taken a poll and separated that out to those using a browser
>and those using a real newsreader?
> 

No, dear boy.  I apply sane thinking, instead.  Meanwhile, you take
the crazy person path and insist that it must be everyone else and not
you.

Fact:  I'm using a newsreader.  His posts look fine to me.  Only Jimp
the Chimp is complaining.  Perhaps Jimp the Chimp needs to investigate
how to get proper character support on his newsreader and OS?


-- 
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
 only stupid."
                            -- Heinrich Heine

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570202

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-04-13 18:07 +0000
Message-ID<ife2uc-qvn.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#570097
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>
>>> 
>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>
>> 
>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>to be ASCII text.
>>
> 
> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
> render a character correctly.

Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.

As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.

The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.



-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570239

FromFred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-13 13:01 -0700
Message-ID<g69tgb9fm8hb50q3ehkt5534o2i1vof4lu@4ax.com>
In reply to#570202
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>
>>> 
>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>
>> 
>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>> render a character correctly.
>>
>
>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>
>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>
>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>

Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.  Anyone sane would say
that means that it's most likely that the problem is on your end. You,
however, immediately assume that the problem is with the sender, even
though his articles look fine to everyone else.


-- 
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
 only stupid."
                            -- Heinrich Heine

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570273

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-04-13 20:39 +0000
Message-ID<mcn2uc-67p.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#570239
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>>> render a character correctly.
>>>
>>
>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>>
>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>>
>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>>
> 
> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.

No, I am the only one mentioning it.

Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know
what others see.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570322

FromFred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-13 19:22 -0700
Message-ID<igvtgb9sp23l7k53vriei2s1kqr7fgvcuk@4ax.com>
In reply to#570273
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>>>> render a character correctly.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>>>
>>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>>>
>>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>>>
>> 
>> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.
>>
>
>No, I am the only one mentioning it.
>
>Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know
>what others see.
>

So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much that they're
remaining silent even though they see the issue just to irk you?

Get off it, Jim.  You are the only demonstrated 'non-compliance' here.


-- 
You are 
What you do 
When it counts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570336

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-04-14 04:08 +0000
Message-ID<2nh3uc-qrr.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#570322
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>>>>> render a character correctly.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>>>>
>>>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>>>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>>>>
>>>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.
>>>
>>
>>No, I am the only one mentioning it.
>>
>>Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know
>>what others see.
>>
> 
> So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much 

There go those voices in your head again.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570368

FromFred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-14 00:49 -0700
Message-ID<pqiugbtmetfne6k0t95s29chqqrn22e44g@4ax.com>
In reply to#570336
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>>>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>>>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>>>>>> render a character correctly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>>>>>
>>>>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>>>>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>>>>>
>>>>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.
>>>>
>>>
>>>No, I am the only one mentioning it.
>>>
>>>Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know
>>>what others see.
>>>
>> 
>> So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much 
>
>There go those voices in your head again.
>

There go those intellectually dishonest editing of sentences again.

Simple question, Jim.  Why are you the only one complaining?  Why is
no one else commenting on seeing what you're seeing?

Just answer the question.


-- 
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
 your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
                             -- Mark Twain

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570475

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-04-14 18:10 +0000
Message-ID<6135uc-nl3.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#570368
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>>>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>>>>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>>>>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>>>>>>> render a character correctly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>>>>>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No, I am the only one mentioning it.
>>>>
>>>>Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know
>>>>what others see.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much 
>>
>>There go those voices in your head again.
>>
> 
> There go those intellectually dishonest editing of sentences again.
> 
> Simple question, Jim.  Why are you the only one complaining?  Why is
> no one else commenting on seeing what you're seeing?

Whan did you take the poll to determine what others see?

Why do you care some much that you keep going on about it?

Other than you are a classic school yard bully...


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570533

FromFred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-14 14:39 -0700
Message-ID<2930hb98gecfutgq2okq51ufh0sv52kjha@4ax.com>
In reply to#570475
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>>>>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>>>>>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>>>>>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>>>>>>>> render a character correctly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>>>>>>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>No, I am the only one mentioning it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know
>>>>>what others see.
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much 
>>>
>>>There go those voices in your head again.
>>>
>> 
>> There go those intellectually dishonest editing of sentences again.
>> 
>> Simple question, Jim.  Why are you the only one complaining?  Why is
>> no one else commenting on seeing what you're seeing?
>>
>
>Whan did you take the poll to determine what others see?
>

I don't need a poll to observe that no one else is complaining.  Stop
dodging the questions.  Why are you the only one complaining?  Why is
no one else commenting on seeing what you're seeing?

>
>Why do you care some much that you keep going on about it?
>

Why do you?  Myself, I think your "the other guy is doing it wrong
even though I'm the only one complaining" approach is an interesting
window into the dysfunctional way your mind works.  It's particularly
interesting because you didn't bring it up until you'd been made to
look silly on the issues.

>
>Other than you are a classic school yard bully...
>

Coming from you that's really funny, Jim.


-- 
You are 
What you do 
When it counts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570550

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-04-14 22:30 +0000
Message-ID<l9i5uc-r65.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#570533
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>>>>>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>>>>>>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>>>>>>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>>>>>>>>> render a character correctly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>>>>>>>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, I am the only one mentioning it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know
>>>>>>what others see.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much 
>>>>
>>>>There go those voices in your head again.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> There go those intellectually dishonest editing of sentences again.
>>> 
>>> Simple question, Jim.  Why are you the only one complaining?  Why is
>>> no one else commenting on seeing what you're seeing?
>>>
>>
>>Whan did you take the poll to determine what others see?
>>
> 
> I don't need a poll to observe that no one else is complaining.

But you do to determine what others are seeing.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570586

FromFred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-14 17:07 -0700
Message-ID<r1c0hb5rd5tlimp83e2bsabqp2jf9ss8ts@4ax.com>
In reply to#570550
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>>>>>>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>>>>>>>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>>>>>>>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>>>>>>>>>> render a character correctly.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>>>>>>>>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, I am the only one mentioning it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know
>>>>>>>what others see.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much 
>>>>>
>>>>>There go those voices in your head again.
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> There go those intellectually dishonest editing of sentences again.
>>>> 
>>>> Simple question, Jim.  Why are you the only one complaining?  Why is
>>>> no one else commenting on seeing what you're seeing?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Whan did you take the poll to determine what others see?
>>>
>> 
>> I don't need a poll to observe that no one else is complaining.
>
>But you do to determine what others are seeing.
>

Go back and reread the question, then stop dodging.  I asked you WHY
ARE YOU THE ONLY ONE COMPLAINING and WHY IS NO ONE ELSE COMMENT ON
SEEING WHAT YOU'RE SEEING.

No poll required.  Simple questions.  Jimp the Chimp shucks and jives
to duck the questions.


-- 
You are 
What you do 
When it counts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570603

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-04-15 00:34 +0000
Message-ID<sgp5uc-816.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#570586
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>>>>>>>>>>> render a character correctly.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>>>>>>>>>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No, I am the only one mentioning it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know
>>>>>>>>what others see.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There go those voices in your head again.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> There go those intellectually dishonest editing of sentences again.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Simple question, Jim.  Why are you the only one complaining?  Why is
>>>>> no one else commenting on seeing what you're seeing?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Whan did you take the poll to determine what others see?
>>>>
>>> 
>>> I don't need a poll to observe that no one else is complaining.
>>
>>But you do to determine what others are seeing.
>>
> 
> Go back and reread the question, then stop dodging.  I asked you WHY
> ARE YOU THE ONLY ONE COMPLAINING and WHY IS NO ONE ELSE COMMENT ON
> SEEING WHAT YOU'RE SEEING.

Why are you going on and on and on and on and on about something that
has absolutely nothing to do with you?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570621

FromFred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-14 19:21 -0700
Message-ID<b0k0hb5jr9a3ckfhj9r1h0vukqt8i0gvv8@4ax.com>
In reply to#570603
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>>>>>>>>>>>> render a character correctly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>>>>>>>>>>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No, I am the only one mentioning it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know
>>>>>>>>>what others see.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There go those voices in your head again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There go those intellectually dishonest editing of sentences again.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Simple question, Jim.  Why are you the only one complaining?  Why is
>>>>>> no one else commenting on seeing what you're seeing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Whan did you take the poll to determine what others see?
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> I don't need a poll to observe that no one else is complaining.
>>>
>>>But you do to determine what others are seeing.
>>>
>> 
>> Go back and reread the question, then stop dodging.  I asked you WHY
>> ARE YOU THE ONLY ONE COMPLAINING and WHY IS NO ONE ELSE COMMENT ON
>> SEEING WHAT YOU'RE SEEING.
>
>Why are you going on and on and on and on and on about something that
>has absolutely nothing to do with you?
>

Because RFI compliance matters?  Why are you?


-- 
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
 territory."
                                      --G. Behn

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570784

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-04-15 21:39 +0000
Message-ID<am38uc-jfd.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#570621
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006.  Don?t blame me 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc.  It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong.  Everyone can read it just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine but you.  Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> render a character correctly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>>>>>>>>>>>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>No, I am the only one mentioning it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know
>>>>>>>>>>what others see.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>There go those voices in your head again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There go those intellectually dishonest editing of sentences again.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Simple question, Jim.  Why are you the only one complaining?  Why is
>>>>>>> no one else commenting on seeing what you're seeing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Whan did you take the poll to determine what others see?
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't need a poll to observe that no one else is complaining.
>>>>
>>>>But you do to determine what others are seeing.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> Go back and reread the question, then stop dodging.  I asked you WHY
>>> ARE YOU THE ONLY ONE COMPLAINING and WHY IS NO ONE ELSE COMMENT ON
>>> SEEING WHAT YOU'RE SEEING.
>>
>>Why are you going on and on and on and on and on about something that
>>has absolutely nothing to do with you?
>>
> 
> Because RFI compliance matters?  Why are you?
 
Chuckle. 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web