Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517194 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-27 09:09 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-19 12:45 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 56 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:09 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:33 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 17:28 -0400
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:34 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:54 +0000
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 18:48 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-28 00:37 -0400
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:00 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:40 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:02 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:01 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-28 21:12 -0400
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 16:09 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-28 00:45 -0400
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:08 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:06 +0100
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 00:32 -0400
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (list of seven) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:19 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (list of seven) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 16:19 +0100
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (list of seven) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:04 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (list of seven) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 17:37 -0700
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:10 +0000
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:20 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:35 +0000
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 19:50 -0500
asbestos isn't good to breathe, when noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:23 -0700
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 17:31 -0400
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:56 +0000
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:09 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:07 +0000
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:51 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:29 +0000
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:57 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:41 +0000
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:00 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:23 +0000
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:32 +0100
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:32 +0100
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 19:46 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:04 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 10:24 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 10:23 -0700
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:13 +0000
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:30 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:32 +0000
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:55 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:40 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:34 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:34 +0000
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:55 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:36 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:31 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 11:38 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:24 -0500
Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:45 -0400
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 17:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (list of seven) |
| Message-ID | <78d3e020-75a5-4043-9d47-b3d38f3de552@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #517888 |
well, if they were CGIs, then Trickier Divk must hve known, so that he could call off the interceptors without killing every one (or, any one > HOLY COW this is a first. For once T-annoy did not screw with my signature. > > Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 17:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8ss3bc-p8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517194 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs > > Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the > media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers. There were no media flown CGI's, kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 16:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <xNCdnS54hvqv4kLInZ2dnUU7-Q-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517223 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:8ss3bc-p8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs >> >> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the >> media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers. > > There were no media flown CGI's, kook. ROTFLMAO because both ABC and FOX were talking to real eye witnesses when the CGI rammed the South Tower that did not see the CGIs fly into the Twin Towers. As a matter of fact FOX even had the eye witness say what he did see hit the North Tower and it was just crap exploding out the other side of the North Tower and that would be exactly like CGIs were used in Nuke York City. DUH Don't forget what the term "verisimilitude" means because it is things done to make people believe something else really happened. <G> Nuclear destruction of the WTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 21:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8dc4bc-0ss.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517292 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ROTFLMAO because both ABC and FOX were talking to real eye witnesses when > the CGI rammed the South Tower that did not see the CGIs fly into the Twin > Towers. Raving giggerish. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 19:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrob8d$82r$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517292 |
On 8/27/2015 4:20 PM, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:8ss3bc-p8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> 911 RrashPkysics REAL pain hits doggie/ falls to the sky. >>> https://www.BigBoobs.com/watch?v=ERSSKKDJ6ZQUWvDFs >>> >>> Too bad CGIs do fall to the ground or everybody would have known the >>> media flew two CGIs and their mothers into the Twin Towers of Tut. >> >> There were no media flown CGI's, kook. > <snip kook babble> nothing > > Rocky > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 12:23 -0700 |
| Subject | asbestos isn't good to breathe, when |
| Message-ID | <c79eddfe-bd08-464f-b139-27f5ea317bef@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #517292 |
like, the crew waw on one of at least 2 of four wrongs sides of the plane-bomb (or, bombplane. the towers might not have melted, if they had been clad with asbestos > North Tower and it was just crap exploding out the other side of the North > Tower and that would be exactly like CGIs were used in Nuke York City. DUH > > Don't forget what the term "verisimilitude" means because it is things done > to make people believe something else really happened. <G> > > Nuclear destruction of the WTC > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y > > Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrqes0$d1d$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517292 |
On 27/08/2015 22:20, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:8ss3bc-p8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs >>> >>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the >>> media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers. >> >> There were no media flown CGI's, kook. > > ROTFLMAO because both ABC and FOX were talking to real eye witnesses when > the CGI rammed the South Tower that did not see the CGIs fly into the Twin > Towers. > So the people they were interviewing did not see an event while they were being interviewed, perhaps they were looking at the camera. > As a matter of fact FOX even had the eye witness say what he did see hit the > North Tower and it was just crap exploding out the other side of the North > Tower and that would be exactly like CGIs were used in Nuke York City. DUH > Note 'the' eye witness, so only one then. > Don't forget what the term "verisimilitude" means because it is things done > to make people believe something else really happened. <G> > And----- > Nuclear destruction of the WTC > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 17:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrnvgr$cb1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517223 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs >> >> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the >> media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers. > > There were no media flown CGI's, kook. > > The facts are some airliners were hijacked. > > Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires > which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed > almost 2 hours later. > > One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the > western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. > > When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature > that can be detected anywhere on the planet. > > There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the > collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon > and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. > > This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. > > Everything else is kook babble. > > That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. > > That there is missing rubble is kook babble. > > That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. > > That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. > > That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear > devices is kook babble. > > That there was an EMP is kook babble. > > That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not > seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. > > That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything > to do with what happened is kook babble. > > That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. > > That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima > or Nagasaki is kook babble. > > That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear > is kook babble. > > That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance > and still be expected to work is kook babble. > > That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear > bombs is kook babble. > > That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the > airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. > > That all the video was CGI is kook babble. > > That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook > babble. > > That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the > windows is kook babble. > > That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. > > That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion > is kook babble. > > There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to > ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. > > Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. > > Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble. > > Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is > kook babble. > > Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. > > > <snip remaining kook babble> Good for you. You've memorized and swallowed the fairytale well. Now tell us the one about Jack and the Beanstalk. Or why you should never trust any old women in the woods who live in a house made of candy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 21:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ikd4bc-i1t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517299 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: <snip kook babble> Nothing left. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 17:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ueSdnXrL_JBCF0LInZ2dnUU7-VGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517312 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:ikd4bc-i1t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > > Nothing But who asked you to post everything you can prove about the Great 9/11 Hoax? -------- OP follows ------------- 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 23:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3rh4bc-s6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517316 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > But who asked you to post everything you can prove about the Great 9/11 > Hoax? The only "Great 9/11 Hoax" is the insane, idiotic gibberish in your deluded mind, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 10:51 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) |
| Message-ID | <c8mdnaIenucVSXzInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517330 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:3rh4bc-s6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> But who asked you to post everything you can prove about the Great 9/11 >> Hoax? > > The only "Great 9/11 Hoax" is the insane, idiotic gibberish in > your deluded mind, kook. ROTFLMAO because a lot of people know we were fed a bunch of crap about the Pentagon and Pranksville, PA. and the fact that the media edited the sound on some of their clips with the Twin Towers prove they were in on the Great 9/11 Hoax there too. Here see for yourself. There is a clip around 6:02 and then another video clip around 6:45 that have the exact same woman screaming. But both clips are from different locations. See: September 11 - UA Flight 175 - compilation from different angles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKrPhDhalBw Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 16:29 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) |
| Message-ID | <k839bc-taf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517641 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ROTFLMAO because a lot of people know we were fed a bunch of crap about the > Pentagon and Pranksville, PA. and the fact that the media edited the sound > on some of their clips with the Twin Towers prove they were in on the Great > 9/11 Hoax there too. The only hoax is in your paranoid, delusional, bat shit crazy mind, kook. <snip remaining idiocy> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 11:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) |
| Message-ID | <Ff2dndbUOKx1fnzInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517651 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:k839bc-taf.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> ROTFLMAO because a lot of people know we were fed a bunch of crap about >> the >> Pentagon and Pranksville, PA. and the fact that the media edited the >> sound >> on some of their clips with the Twin Towers prove they were in on the >> Great >> 9/11 Hoax there too. > > The only hoax is in your paranoid, delusional, bat shit crazy mind, kook. As usual you have no supporting evidence but I do. 9/11 Physics Debate 2014 - Dr. Griscom wins. No top physicists support Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m8XaLdGKBw Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 17:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) |
| Message-ID | <sf79bc-vof.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517663 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > As usual you have no supporting evidence but I do. The only evidence you have is evidence that you are a delusional, paranoid, raving, lunatic. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Be sure to follow all the links in the above links. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 13:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) |
| Message-ID | <JKedndcBQeDpbnzInZ2dnUU7-dOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517670 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:sf79bc-vof.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> As usual you have no supporting evidence but I do. > > The only evidence you have is evidence that you are a delusional, > paranoid, > raving, lunatic. OBJECTION BTW I've won a jury trial before 12 to 0 and without an attorney and in case you haven't noticed bullshit like the statement you just made above are not allowed courtrooms. Now try to make a real argument. ROTFLMAO Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 18:23 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) |
| Message-ID | <kt99bc-h1g.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517673 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > BTW I've won a jury trial before 12 to 0 and without an attorney and in case > you haven't noticed bullshit like the statement you just made above are not > allowed courtrooms. This has nothing to do with your paranoid delusions about what happend on 9/11, you raving kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 19:32 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) |
| Message-ID | <mrstns$bd9$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517673 |
On 29/08/2015 19:00, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:sf79bc-vof.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> As usual you have no supporting evidence but I do. >> >> The only evidence you have is evidence that you are a delusional, >> paranoid, >> raving, lunatic. > > OBJECTION > > BTW I've won a jury trial before 12 to 0 and without an attorney and in case > you haven't noticed bullshit like the statement you just made above are not > allowed courtrooms. > > Now try to make a real argument. ROTFLMAO > > Rocky sheeple > > Once again you edit out part of a post, that would indeed be allowed in a court. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 19:32 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. (media edits audio to help with the hoax) |
| Message-ID | <mrsto4$bd9$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517641 |
On 29/08/2015 16:51, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:3rh4bc-s6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> But who asked you to post everything you can prove about the Great 9/11 >>> Hoax? >> >> The only "Great 9/11 Hoax" is the insane, idiotic gibberish in >> your deluded mind, kook. > > ROTFLMAO because a lot of people know we were fed a bunch of crap about the > Pentagon and Pranksville, PA. and the fact that the media edited the sound > on some of their clips with the Twin Towers prove they were in on the Great > 9/11 Hoax there too. > > Here see for yourself. There is a clip around 6:02 and then another video > clip around 6:45 that have the exact same woman screaming. But both clips > are from different locations. See: > I hear no scream at 6:45. > September 11 - UA Flight 175 - compilation from different angles > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKrPhDhalBw > > Rocky sheeple > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 19:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrob20$82r$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517316 |
On 8/27/2015 5:09 PM, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:ikd4bc-i1t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >> Nothing > > But who who asked you you to post post everything you you can prove about the Great 9/11 > Ko0kx? > > -------- OP follows Hillary ------------- > > 911 BrashPhysicks REAL plane hips bldg/ falls to the ground. > https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=ER6ZfubarQUWvDFs > > Two bad CGIs do fall to the ground and everybody kinda shoulda woulda have known the > media, Batman, flew two CGIs into the Twin Tomers. > > Roc-iky > no, dont mess with the guys name, he will put you on his shitlist, and golly we dont want that now do we after all he is just makeing stuff up about the twin tower, how about making stuff up about Hillary? like she is stuffed and rolls around on a platform with rollers, or she should be stuffed, or she planted a mini nuke and blew up the WTC and got a brain dead dose of radiation........
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web