Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #527181 > unrolled thread

What are gravitational waves?

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2015-10-21 07:30 -0500
Last post2015-10-26 15:53 -0700
Articles 12 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  What are gravitational waves? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 07:30 -0500
    What are gravitational waves? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 06:59 -0700
      Re: What are gravitational waves? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 15:58 -0500
        Re: What are gravitational waves? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 19:01 -0700
    Re: What are gravitational waves? trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2015-10-21 07:47 -0700
    Re: What are gravitational waves? gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-21 10:27 -0500
      Re: What are gravitational waves? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 10:02 -0700
    Re: What are gravitational waves? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-21 17:16 +0000
      Re: What are gravitational waves? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 16:32 -0500
        Re: What are gravitational waves? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-21 22:05 +0000
        Re: What are gravitational waves? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 15:17 -0700
          Re: What are gravitational waves? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 15:53 -0700

#527181 — What are gravitational waves?

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-21 07:30 -0500
SubjectWhat are gravitational waves?
Message-ID<d4WdnSgvsbL2GLrLnZ2dnUU7-XkAAAAA@giganews.com>
What are gravitational waves?
> http://phys.org/news/2015-06-gravitational.html#nRlv

> Who wants to bet against Einstein? You? You? What about you?
>
> Sure, there were a few bumps, but the guy's track record on
> relativity is spotless. He explained the strange way that Mercury
> orbits the sun. He guessed astronomers would see stars deflected by
> the sun's gravity during a solar eclipse. He predicted that gravity
> would redshift light, and it took physicists 50 years to finally come
> up with an experiment to verify it.
>
> Based on his predictions, scientists confirmed galaxies warp light
> with their gravity, photons get time dilated when they pass near the
> sun, and clocks that travel at high speeds experience less time than
> clocks on Earth.
>
> They've even tested gravitational redshift, frame-dragging and the
> equivalence principle. Which is a word salad we'll cover in the
> future, or for those of you who can't wait, google.
>
> Every time Bertie made a prediction about relativity, physicists have
> been able to verify via experimentation. And so, according to this
> fuzzy man with the giant brain, when massive objects crash into each
> other, or when black holes form, there should be a release of
> gravitational waves.
>

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#527189

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-21 06:59 -0700
Message-ID<86dd5885-1945-4a92-8bd9-113c8194b431@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527181
Gravitational waves do not exist.
Matter absorbs incoming energy.
Matter gives off energy.
Matter does not give off "backwards
energy".
Idiots.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527258

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-21 15:58 -0500
Message-ID<n08u8q$mau$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#527189
On 10/21/2015 8:59 AM, john wrote:
> Gravitational waves do not exist.
> Matter absorbs incoming energy.
> Matter gives off energy.
> Matter does not give off "backwards
> energy".
> Idiots.
>

And yet positively charged things pull negatively charged things.
3rd grade science.
Amazing how you can just say, "Doesn't happen. Can't. Makes no sense to 
me, so it doesn't happen."

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527348

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-21 19:01 -0700
Message-ID<e27326cd-56d1-46b0-92eb-9f78af48d2cb@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527258
Odd
Swarming graviton man.
Clue? No. Clueless. Yes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527191

Fromtrudi.schwander@gmail.com
Date2015-10-21 07:47 -0700
Message-ID<d2d9e153-b807-41a8-9c5a-20b0a4b6e964@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527181
On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 2:30:40 PM UTC+2, Sam Wormley wrote:
> What are gravitational waves?
> > http://phys.org/news/2015-06-gravitational.html#nRlv
> 
> > Who wants to bet against Einstein? You? You? What about you?
> >
> > Sure, there were a few bumps, but the guy's track record on
> > relativity is spotless. He explained the strange way that Mercury
> > orbits the sun. He guessed astronomers would see stars deflected by
> > the sun's gravity during a solar eclipse. He predicted that gravity
> > would redshift light, and it took physicists 50 years to finally come
> > up with an experiment to verify it.
> >
> > Based on his predictions, scientists confirmed galaxies warp light
> > with their gravity, photons get time dilated when they pass near the
> > sun, and clocks that travel at high speeds experience less time than
> > clocks on Earth.
> >
> > They've even tested gravitational redshift, frame-dragging and the
> > equivalence principle. Which is a word salad we'll cover in the
> > future, or for those of you who can't wait, google.
> >
> > Every time Bertie made a prediction about relativity, physicists have
> > been able to verify via experimentation. And so, according to this
> > fuzzy man with the giant brain, when massive objects crash into each
> > other, or when black holes form, there should be a release of
> > gravitational waves.
> >
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

In my simplification of things, while light or EM waves can be likened to "sound waves" in the aether of the vacuum, gravity can be likened to "wind" or "air pressures" in the aether of the vacuum. 
andrew vecsey

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527193

Fromgilber34 <fafa@invalid.com>
Date2015-10-21 10:27 -0500
Message-ID<n08asn$68e$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#527181
On 10/21/2015 7:30 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> What are gravitational waves?

<snip crap>



WHERE are the gravitational waves ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527203

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-21 10:02 -0700
Message-ID<1219f3d7-c9f9-40e2-a5c3-73a35e001dd9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527193
On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 8:27:26 AM UTC-7, gilber34 wrote:
> On 10/21/2015 7:30 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > What are gravitational waves?
> 
> <snip crap>
> 
> 
> 
> WHERE are the gravitational waves ?

Gravity force is created by a field.Much like water pressure.Its field is particles all the way down.If gravity force worked on waves they would have been found 100 years ago. When GOP Mafia NASA took over after killing JFK they killed the great Saturn V,gave the tax payers the Micky Mouse shuttles with their $25,000,000 toilets.To get to the ISS we now depend on Russia. Think Nixon Think Bush Think Annenberg. You will get the true picture why the Rube Goldberg LIGO was built. LIGO puts big bucks in Swiss banks. Wave good by to USA money.That is all the waving.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527216

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-10-21 17:16 +0000
Message-ID<3stkfc-fmb.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#527181
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:

Nothing; just another cut and paste.

Have you ever wondered what your life might have been like if you had
the competence to do more than just copy the words of others, spamming
piece of shit?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527265

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-21 16:32 -0500
Message-ID<6u6dnTnonv3pmbXLnZ2dnUU7-N-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#527216
On 10/21/15 12:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Nothing; just another cut and paste.
>
> Have you ever wondered what your life might have been like if you had
> the competence to do more than just copy the words of others, spamming
> piece of shit?

   Ho boy, jimp, you are a piece of work. Your jealousy is obvious, your
   language inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total disgust
   are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need
   these services:
> http://www.yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes


   What are gravitational waves?
 > http://phys.org/news/2015-06-gravitational.html#nRlv

 > Who wants to bet against Einstein? You? You? What about you?
 >
 > Sure, there were a few bumps, but the guy's track record on
 > relativity is spotless. He explained the strange way that Mercury
 > orbits the sun. He guessed astronomers would see stars deflected by
 > the sun's gravity during a solar eclipse. He predicted that gravity
 > would redshift light, and it took physicists 50 years to finally come
 > up with an experiment to verify it.
 >
 > Based on his predictions, scientists confirmed galaxies warp light
 > with their gravity, photons get time dilated when they pass near the
 > sun, and clocks that travel at high speeds experience less time than
 > clocks on Earth.
 >
 > They've even tested gravitational redshift, frame-dragging and the
 > equivalence principle. Which is a word salad we'll cover in the
 > future, or for those of you who can't wait, google.
 >
 > Every time Bertie made a prediction about relativity, physicists have
 > been able to verify via experimentation. And so, according to this
 > fuzzy man with the giant brain, when massive objects crash into each
 > other, or when black holes form, there should be a release of
 > gravitational waves.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527282

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-10-21 22:05 +0000
Message-ID<kpelfc-mfd.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#527265
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
Nothing; just another repeated cut and paste.

Have you ever wondered what your life might have been like if you had
the competence to do more than just copy the words of others, spamming
piece of shit?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527542

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-22 15:17 -0700
Message-ID<7e6cd60e-19c9-4126-9823-27c7a10f8039@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527265
On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 2:32:40 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 10/21/15 12:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > Nothing; just another cut and paste.
> >
> > Have you ever wondered what your life might have been like if you had
> > the competence to do more than just copy the words of others, spamming
> > piece of shit?
> 
>    Ho boy, jimp, you are a piece of work. Your jealousy is obvious, your
>    language inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total disgust
>    are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need
>    these services:
> > http://www.yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes
> 
> 
>    What are gravitational waves?
>  > http://phys.org/news/2015-06-gravitational.html#nRlv
> 
>  > Who wants to bet against Einstein? You? You? What about you?
>  >
>  > Sure, there were a few bumps, but the guy's track record on
>  > relativity is spotless. He explained the strange way that Mercury
>  > orbits the sun. He guessed astronomers would see stars deflected by
>  > the sun's gravity during a solar eclipse. He predicted that gravity
>  > would redshift light, and it took physicists 50 years to finally come
>  > up with an experiment to verify it.
>  >
>  > Based on his predictions, scientists confirmed galaxies warp light
>  > with their gravity, photons get time dilated when they pass near the
>  > sun, and clocks that travel at high speeds experience less time than
>  > clocks on Earth.
>  >
>  > They've even tested gravitational redshift, frame-dragging and the
>  > equivalence principle. Which is a word salad we'll cover in the
>  > future, or for those of you who can't wait, google.
>  >
>  > Every time Bertie made a prediction about relativity, physicists have
>  > been able to verify via experimentation. And so, according to this
>  > fuzzy man with the giant brain, when massive objects crash into each
>  > other, or when black holes form, there should be a release of
>  > gravitational waves.
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

Gravity waves are in reality GOP Mafia Brain waves. Theses waves are flat.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#528383

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-26 15:53 -0700
Message-ID<1ac7a3d7-bcf2-4d7a-ae01-288dfc728503@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527542
On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 3:17:21 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 2:32:40 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > On 10/21/15 12:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > > Nothing; just another cut and paste.
> > >
> > > Have you ever wondered what your life might have been like if you had
> > > the competence to do more than just copy the words of others, spamming
> > > piece of shit?
> > 
> >    Ho boy, jimp, you are a piece of work. Your jealousy is obvious, your
> >    language inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total disgust
> >    are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need
> >    these services:
> > > http://www.yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes
> > 
> > 
> >    What are gravitational waves?
> >  > http://phys.org/news/2015-06-gravitational.html#nRlv
> > 
> >  > Who wants to bet against Einstein? You? You? What about you?
> >  >
> >  > Sure, there were a few bumps, but the guy's track record on
> >  > relativity is spotless. He explained the strange way that Mercury
> >  > orbits the sun. He guessed astronomers would see stars deflected by
> >  > the sun's gravity during a solar eclipse. He predicted that gravity
> >  > would redshift light, and it took physicists 50 years to finally come
> >  > up with an experiment to verify it.
> >  >
> >  > Based on his predictions, scientists confirmed galaxies warp light
> >  > with their gravity, photons get time dilated when they pass near the
> >  > sun, and clocks that travel at high speeds experience less time than
> >  > clocks on Earth.
> >  >
> >  > They've even tested gravitational redshift, frame-dragging and the
> >  > equivalence principle. Which is a word salad we'll cover in the
> >  > future, or for those of you who can't wait, google.
> >  >
> >  > Every time Bertie made a prediction about relativity, physicists have
> >  > been able to verify via experimentation. And so, according to this
> >  > fuzzy man with the giant brain, when massive objects crash into each
> >  > other, or when black holes form, there should be a release of
> >  > gravitational waves.
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > community, and physics-related social issues.
> 
> Gravity waves are in reality GOP Mafia Brain waves. Theses waves are flat.TreBert

If GOP Mafia NASA knew what a gravity wave did to create the force of gravity I would give them some slack.They don'[t have a clue.still they got the billions up front,and that tells it all. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web