Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #547303 > unrolled thread

Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen in place deep inside aging stars

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen in place deep inside aging stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 15:41 -0600
    Re: Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen in place deep inside aging stars jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-22 22:12 +0000
      Re: Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen in place deep inside aging stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:15 -0600
        Re: Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen in place deep inside aging stars R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-23 16:26 +0000
          Re: Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen in place deep inside aging stars jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 19:26 +0000
        Re: Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen in place deep inside aging stars jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 19:23 +0000

#547303 — Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen in place deep inside aging stars

Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen in 
place deep inside aging stars
> http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/old-stars-fossil-fields-2101201623/


> Now, Dennis Stello (University of Sydney and Aarhus University,
> Denmark), Fuller, and their team has expanded this work to 3,600 red
> giants, observed with the Kepler spacecraft. The astronomers found
> that here, too, some red giants had “muffled” variations, but just
> how much they were suppressed depended on how massive the star was.
> For stars just above the Sun’s  mass and lighter, the stars looked
> normal. But for the heftiest of the sample — 1.6 to 2 solar masses —
> about half are “depressed,” the team reported January 6th at the
> American Astronomical Society meeting in Kissimmee, Florida, and in
> the January 21st Nature.
>




-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#547309

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen in 
> place deep inside aging stars

Now if we could just confirm that cut and paste spammers are abiding
by copyrights.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547513

On 1/22/16 4:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Now if we could just confirm that cut and paste spammers are abiding
> by copyrights.


   Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your
   absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger
   Management classes. You, jimp, need these services:
   > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes

   Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen
   in place deep inside aging stars
> http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/old-stars-fossil-fields-2101201623/

 > Now, Dennis Stello (University of Sydney and Aarhus University,
 > Denmark), Fuller, and their team has expanded this work to 3,600 red
 > giants, observed with the Kepler spacecraft. The astronomers found
 > that here, too, some red giants had “muffled” variations, but just
 > how much they were suppressed depended on how massive the star was.
 > For stars just above the Sun’s  mass and lighter, the stars looked
 > normal. But for the heftiest of the sample — 1.6 to 2 solar masses —
 > about half are “depressed,” the team reported January 6th at the
 > American Astronomical Society meeting in Kissimmee, Florida, and in
 > the January 21st Nature.
 >





-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547522

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/22/16 4:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Now if we could just confirm that cut and paste spammers are abiding
>> by copyrights.

Funny. I thought jimp was more your sysadmin, not a copyright lawyer.

Here's another site he might find useful in his neverending
quest to make his ranting seem reasonable:

About the Fair Use| U.S. Copyright Office
copyright.gov/fair-use/
The Fair Use Index tracks a variety of judicial decisions to help both 
lawyers and non-lawyers better understand the types of uses courts have 
previously ...
#More Information on Fair Use - #Search Cases - #37 C.F.R. ? 201.2(a)


>   Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your
>   absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger
>   Management classes. You, jimp, need these services:
>   > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes
>   Astronomers have confirmed that strong magnetic fields are frozen
>   in place deep inside aging stars
>> http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/old-stars-fossil-fields-2101201623/
> > Now, Dennis Stello (University of Sydney and Aarhus University,
> > Denmark), Fuller, and their team has expanded this work to 3,600 red
> > giants, observed with the Kepler spacecraft. The astronomers found
> > that here, too, some red giants had ?muffled? variations, but just
> > how much they were suppressed depended on how massive the star was.
> > For stars just above the Sun?s  mass and lighter, the stars looked
> > normal. But for the heftiest of the sample ? 1.6 to 2 solar masses ?
> > about half are ?depressed,? the team reported January 6th at the
> > American Astronomical Society meeting in Kissimmee, Florida, and in
> > the January 21st Nature.


--
Devastating WA bushfire finally extinguished
ABC News, 23 Jan 2016 05:06Z
A bushfire which claimed two lives and almost wiped a small Western
Australian community off the map is finally extinguished.

Blizzard brings near-record coastal flooding to New Jersey and Delaware
Mashable, 23 Jan 2016 13:51Z
This blizzard has another hazard besides the snow, sleet and strong winds
its bringing to the East Coast: flooding. The storm is pounding the New
Jersey and Delaware shorelines with 22-foot waves and a 3 to 5-foot storm
surge that sent water levels to ...

9 dead, 8K flights canceled as blizzard immobilizes East Coast
USA TODAY, 23 Jan 2016 14:25Z
Washington. Major cities, roadways and airports along the East Coast were
largely immobilized Saturday by a massive and deadly snowstorm that showed
no signs of letting up.

Heavy rain and floods predicted as freak tropical weather ends winter snap
Daily Star, 23 Jan 2016 14:36Z
The Environment Agency has issued 19 flood alerts across central and
northern England with six more serious flood warnings in place for the south-
west.

"Snowzilla" expected to continue for another 12 hrs
23 Jan 2016 16:19Z
NY officials have told residents to turn around and go home if they
are trying to get into the city. Snow is expected to continue until
midnight and accumulation looks certain to top 20" in NYc putting 
"Snowzilla" in the top 5 storms since records began in the 1860s.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547623

R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 1/22/16 4:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> Now if we could just confirm that cut and paste spammers are abiding
>>> by copyrights.
> 
> Funny. I thought jimp was more your sysadmin, not a copyright lawyer.
> 
> Here's another site he might find useful in his neverending
> quest to make his ranting seem reasonable:
> 
> About the Fair Use| U.S. Copyright Office
> copyright.gov/fair-use/
> The Fair Use Index tracks a variety of judicial decisions to help both 
> lawyers and non-lawyers better understand the types of uses courts have 
> previously ...

Most copyrights contain a clause stating that portions of the work
may be copied without prior permission if the source is cited AND
the copy is part of a larger work.

A single sentence such as "Everyone should read this", when such even
appears, is not a larger work.



-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547622

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/22/16 4:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Now if we could just confirm that cut and paste spammers are abiding
>> by copyrights.
> 
> 
>   Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your

Why do you ignore copyrights?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web