Groups > sci.physics > #519407 > unrolled thread

The Multiverse Of Perception

Started by	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post	2015-09-06 17:25 -0500
Last post	2015-09-11 10:50 -0700
Articles	20 on this page of 26 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

  The Multiverse Of Perception Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 17:25 -0500
    Re: The Multiverse Of Perception jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 22:43 +0000
      Re: The Multiverse Of Perception Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 17:51 -0500
        Re: The Multiverse Of Perception jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 23:06 +0000
          Re: The Multiverse Of Perception Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 18:25 -0500
            Re: The Multiverse Of Perception jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 00:31 +0000
              Re: The Multiverse Of Perception Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 20:01 -0500
                Re: The Multiverse Of Perception jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 01:30 +0000
                  Re: The Multiverse Of Perception Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 21:12 -0500
                    Re: The Multiverse Of Perception jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 03:22 +0000
                      Re: The Multiverse Of Perception Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 11:50 -0500
                        Re: The Multiverse Of Perception jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 17:05 +0000
                          Re: The Multiverse Of Perception Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 12:23 -0500
                            Re: The Multiverse Of Perception jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 17:56 +0000
                        Re: The Multiverse Of Perception HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 06:19 -0400
        Re: The Multiverse Of Perception benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 03:42 -0400
      Re: The Multiverse Of Perception "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 10:03 -0700
        Re: The Multiverse Of Perception "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-07 10:27 -0700
        Re: The Multiverse Of Perception "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 16:43 -0700
          Re: The Multiverse Of Perception "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 17:48 -0700
            Re: The Multiverse Of Perception "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-09 19:25 -0700
          Re: The Multiverse Of Perception Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-09-09 19:02 -0700
    Re: The Multiverse Of Perception "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 09:59 -0700
    Re: The Multiverse Of Perception "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 11:38 -0700
      muddle of perceptrons noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:26 -0700
        Re: muddle of perceptrons noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 10:50 -0700

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

#519407 — The Multiverse Of Perception

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-06 17:25 -0500
Subject	The Multiverse Of Perception
Message-ID	<BpidnWAcQIj3IHHInZ2dnUU7-ccAAAAA@giganews.com>

The Multiverse Of Perception
> http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/09/06/438031629/the-multiverse-of-perception


> Today, we at 13.7 are honored to host as a guest blogger Nobel
> Laureate Frank Wilczek, one of the world's leading theoretical
> physicists. Wilczek won the Nobel Prize for his contributions to our
> understanding of how quarks behave inside particles called hadrons,
> of which protons and neutrons are the most familiar. But Wilczek's
> talents go well beyond that of an amazingly creative physicist. He is
> also author of countless articles and several books, including The
> Lightness of Being (2008), Fantastic Realities (2006) and, with his
> wife Betsy Devine, Longing for the Harmonies (1988). Today, Frank
> writes about a topic he covers at length in his most recent book, A
> Beautiful Question: Finding Nature's Deep Design. Published in July,
> A Beautiful Question is an inspiring meditation on humanity's search
> for beauty and unity in nature.
>
> A Beautiful Question is a long meditation on a single question: Does
> the world embody beautiful ideas?
>
> I thought about this from many angles, bringing in history, art,
> music, psychology and philosophy as well as physical science. I
> concluded, after surveying the evidence, with an emphatic "Yes!"
>
> But to appreciate the significance of that answer, it's important to
> ask another question: Might it have been otherwise? Can we imagine
> that the world might not embody beautiful ideas — that fundamental
> understanding of how the world works could be messy or unattractive?
>
> We can approach those counterfactual questions through thought
> experiments.





-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#519419

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-09-06 22:43 +0000
Message-ID	<e6subc-2l4.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#519407

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Multiverse Of Perception

Meditate on this, you spamming piece of shit:

                     /"\
                    |\./|
                    |   |
                    |   |
                    |   |
                    |   |
                 /'\|   |/'\..
             /~\|   |   |   | \
            |   =[@]=   |   |  \
            |   |   |   |   |   \
            | ~   ~   ~   ~ |`   )
            |                   /
             \                 /
              \               /
               \    _____    /
                |--//''`\--|
                | (( +==)) |
                |--\_|_//--|


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519422

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-06 17:51 -0500
Message-ID	<BpidnZ8fQIgZXnHInZ2dnUU7-ccAAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to	#519419

On 9/6/15 5:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
> Meditate on this, you spamming piece of shit:
>

   What's you problem, jimp? You have no control in your life. Like
   Pavlov's dog, you cannot stop yourself from disparaging other
   posters, name calling, and just being down right nasty. I would
   hate to live your life.

   Try laugh yoga, jimp. Someday you will thank me.

   The Multiverse Of Perception
> http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/09/06/438031629/the-multiverse-of-perception

 > Today, we at 13.7 are honored to host as a guest blogger Nobel
 > Laureate Frank Wilczek, one of the world's leading theoretical
 > physicists. Wilczek won the Nobel Prize for his contributions to our
 > understanding of how quarks behave inside particles called hadrons,
 > of which protons and neutrons are the most familiar. But Wilczek's
 > talents go well beyond that of an amazingly creative physicist. He is
 > also author of countless articles and several books, including The
 > Lightness of Being (2008), Fantastic Realities (2006) and, with his
 > wife Betsy Devine, Longing for the Harmonies (1988). Today, Frank
 > writes about a topic he covers at length in his most recent book, A
 > Beautiful Question: Finding Nature's Deep Design. Published in July,
 > A Beautiful Question is an inspiring meditation on humanity's search
 > for beauty and unity in nature.
 >
 > A Beautiful Question is a long meditation on a single question: Does
 > the world embody beautiful ideas?
 >
 > I thought about this from many angles, bringing in history, art,
 > music, psychology and philosophy as well as physical science. I
 > concluded, after surveying the evidence, with an emphatic "Yes!"
 >
 > But to appreciate the significance of that answer, it's important to
 > ask another question: Might it have been otherwise? Can we imagine
 > that the world might not embody beautiful ideas — that fundamental
 > understanding of how the world works could be messy or unattractive?
 >
 > We can approach those counterfactual questions through thought
 > experiments.






-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519426

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-09-06 23:06 +0000
Message-ID	<sftubc-1u4.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#519422

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/6/15 5:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>> Meditate on this, you spamming piece of shit:
>>
> 
>   What's you problem, jimp?

Spamming, shit headed ass holes that spam the group with cut and paste
crap, you shit headed ass hole spammer.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519428

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-06 18:25 -0500
Message-ID	<BpidnZ4fQIgfVnHInZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#519426

On 9/6/15 6:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
> Spamming, shit headed ass holes that spam the group with cut and paste
> crap, you shit headed ass hole spammer.
>

   What a foul mouth you have, jimp. The Story about Frank Wilczek
   is very good. You should read it my faithful Pavlov's dog.

   The Multiverse Of Perception
> http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/09/06/438031629/the-multiverse-of-perception

 > Today, we at 13.7 are honored to host as a guest blogger Nobel
 > Laureate Frank Wilczek, one of the world's leading theoretical
 > physicists. Wilczek won the Nobel Prize for his contributions to our
 > understanding of how quarks behave inside particles called hadrons,
 > of which protons and neutrons are the most familiar. But Wilczek's
 > talents go well beyond that of an amazingly creative physicist. He is
 > also author of countless articles and several books, including The
 > Lightness of Being (2008), Fantastic Realities (2006) and, with his
 > wife Betsy Devine, Longing for the Harmonies (1988). Today, Frank
 > writes about a topic he covers at length in his most recent book, A
 > Beautiful Question: Finding Nature's Deep Design. Published in July,
 > A Beautiful Question is an inspiring meditation on humanity's search
 > for beauty and unity in nature.
 >
 > A Beautiful Question is a long meditation on a single question: Does
 > the world embody beautiful ideas?
 >
 > I thought about this from many angles, bringing in history, art,
 > music, psychology and philosophy as well as physical science. I
 > concluded, after surveying the evidence, with an emphatic "Yes!"
 >
 > But to appreciate the significance of that answer, it's important to
 > ask another question: Might it have been otherwise? Can we imagine
 > that the world might not embody beautiful ideas — that fundamental
 > understanding of how the world works could be messy or unattractive?
 >
 > We can approach those counterfactual questions through thought
 > experiments.





-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519440

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-09-07 00:31 +0000
Message-ID	<qg2vbc-6f5.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#519428

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/6/15 6:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>> Spamming, shit headed ass holes that spam the group with cut and paste
>> crap, you shit headed ass hole spammer.
>>
> 
>   What a foul mouth you have, jimp. 


Did I hurt your feelings, you shit headed ass hole spammer?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519450

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-06 20:01 -0500
Message-ID	<BpidnZEfQIhwfHHInZ2dnUU7-ccAAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to	#519440

On 9/6/15 7:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>
> Did I hurt your feelings, you shit headed ass hole spammer?
>

   Now, now jimp--are you always so nasty, angry and mean spirited?
   Rancho Cucamonga Anger Management Classes
> http://www.yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes

   Shall I make an appointment for you, jimp?

   The Multiverse Of Perception
> http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/09/06/438031629/the-multiverse-of-perception

 > Today, we at 13.7 are honored to host as a guest blogger Nobel
 > Laureate Frank Wilczek, one of the world's leading theoretical
 > physicists. Wilczek won the Nobel Prize for his contributions to our
 > understanding of how quarks behave inside particles called hadrons,
 > of which protons and neutrons are the most familiar. But Wilczek's
 > talents go well beyond that of an amazingly creative physicist. He is
 > also author of countless articles and several books, including The
 > Lightness of Being (2008), Fantastic Realities (2006) and, with his
 > wife Betsy Devine, Longing for the Harmonies (1988). Today, Frank
 > writes about a topic he covers at length in his most recent book, A
 > Beautiful Question: Finding Nature's Deep Design. Published in July,
 > A Beautiful Question is an inspiring meditation on humanity's search
 > for beauty and unity in nature.
 >
 > A Beautiful Question is a long meditation on a single question: Does
 > the world embody beautiful ideas?
 >
 > I thought about this from many angles, bringing in history, art,
 > music, psychology and philosophy as well as physical science. I
 > concluded, after surveying the evidence, with an emphatic "Yes!"
 >
 > But to appreciate the significance of that answer, it's important to
 > ask another question: Might it have been otherwise? Can we imagine
 > that the world might not embody beautiful ideas — that fundamental
 > understanding of how the world works could be messy or unattractive?
 >
 > We can approach those counterfactual questions through thought
 > experiments.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519455

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-09-07 01:30 +0000
Message-ID	<vu5vbc-1r5.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#519450

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/6/15 7:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>>
>> Did I hurt your feelings, you shit headed ass hole spammer?
>>
> 
>   Now, now jimp--are you always so nasty, angry and mean spirited?

Only to shit headed, cut and paste, off topic ass holes like you, and
insane, babbling kooks, you shit headed, cut and paste, off topic spammer.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519465

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-06 21:12 -0500
Message-ID	<ef-dnbuwwZDvb3HInZ2dnUU7-c2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#519455

On 9/6/15 8:30 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>    Now, now jimp--are you always so nasty, angry and mean spirited?
>
> Only to shit headed, cut and paste, off topic ass holes like you, and
> insane, babbling kooks, you shit headed, cut and paste, off topic spammer.
>

   Now, now jimp--Such out of control anger!  Whoo!
   See: Rancho Cucamonga Anger Management Classes
> http://www.yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes

   The Multiverse Of Perception
> http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/09/06/438031629/the-multiverse-of-perception

 > Today, we at 13.7 are honored to host as a guest blogger Nobel
 > Laureate Frank Wilczek, one of the world's leading theoretical
 > physicists. Wilczek won the Nobel Prize for his contributions to our
 > understanding of how quarks behave inside particles called hadrons,
 > of which protons and neutrons are the most familiar. But Wilczek's
 > talents go well beyond that of an amazingly creative physicist. He is
 > also author of countless articles and several books, including The
 > Lightness of Being (2008), Fantastic Realities (2006) and, with his
 > wife Betsy Devine, Longing for the Harmonies (1988). Today, Frank
 > writes about a topic he covers at length in his most recent book, A
 > Beautiful Question: Finding Nature's Deep Design. Published in July,
 > A Beautiful Question is an inspiring meditation on humanity's search
 > for beauty and unity in nature.
 >
 > A Beautiful Question is a long meditation on a single question: Does
 > the world embody beautiful ideas?
 >
 > I thought about this from many angles, bringing in history, art,
 > music, psychology and philosophy as well as physical science. I
 > concluded, after surveying the evidence, with an emphatic "Yes!"
 >
 > But to appreciate the significance of that answer, it's important to
 > ask another question: Might it have been otherwise? Can we imagine
 > that the world might not embody beautiful ideas — that fundamental
 > understanding of how the world works could be messy or unattractive?
 >
 > We can approach those counterfactual questions through thought
 > experiments.





-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519473

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-09-07 03:22 +0000
Message-ID	<9hcvbc-kf6.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#519465

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/6/15 8:30 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>    Now, now jimp--are you always so nasty, angry and mean spirited?
>>
>> Only to shit headed, cut and paste, off topic ass holes like you, and
>> insane, babbling kooks, you shit headed, cut and paste, off topic spammer.
>>
> 
>   Now, now jimp

Now, now, ass hole, shove an off topic cut and paste up your ass,
you shit headed, cut and paste, off topic spammer.



-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519556

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-07 11:50 -0500
Message-ID	<zdCdnWGzL9z8XXDInZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#519473

On 9/6/15 10:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
> Now, now, ass hole, shove an off topic cut and paste up your ass,
> you shit headed, cut and paste, off topic spammer.
>


   Wow, jimp--Such out of control anger!  Whoo!
   See: Rancho Cucamonga Anger Management Classes
> http://www.yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes

   The Multiverse Of Perception
> http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/09/06/438031629/the-multiverse-of-perception

 > Today, we at 13.7 are honored to host as a guest blogger Nobel
 > Laureate Frank Wilczek, one of the world's leading theoretical
 > physicists. Wilczek won the Nobel Prize for his contributions to our
 > understanding of how quarks behave inside particles called hadrons,
 > of which protons and neutrons are the most familiar. But Wilczek's
 > talents go well beyond that of an amazingly creative physicist. He is
 > also author of countless articles and several books, including The
 > Lightness of Being (2008), Fantastic Realities (2006) and, with his
 > wife Betsy Devine, Longing for the Harmonies (1988). Today, Frank
 > writes about a topic he covers at length in his most recent book, A
 > Beautiful Question: Finding Nature's Deep Design. Published in July,
 > A Beautiful Question is an inspiring meditation on humanity's search
 > for beauty and unity in nature.
 >
 > A Beautiful Question is a long meditation on a single question: Does
 > the world embody beautiful ideas?
 >
 > I thought about this from many angles, bringing in history, art,
 > music, psychology and philosophy as well as physical science. I
 > concluded, after surveying the evidence, with an emphatic "Yes!"
 >
 > But to appreciate the significance of that answer, it's important to
 > ask another question: Might it have been otherwise? Can we imagine
 > that the world might not embody beautiful ideas — that fundamental
 > understanding of how the world works could be messy or unattractive?
 >
 > We can approach those counterfactual questions through thought
 > experiments.





-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519573

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-09-07 17:05 +0000
Message-ID	<1ns0cc-gmb.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#519556

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/6/15 10:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>> Now, now, ass hole, shove an off topic cut and paste up your ass,
>> you shit headed, cut and paste, off topic spammer.
>>
> 
> 
>   Wow, jim

Wow, shit head, yet more cut and paste off topic spamming, you worthless
piece of shit.

From the bottom of my heart, fuck off and die soon, ass hole.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519582

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-07 12:23 -0500
Message-ID	<zdCdnZWyL9yTVXDInZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#519573

On 9/7/15 12:05 PM, Nasty name-calling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>  From the bottom of my heart, fuck off and die soon, ass hole.

   jimp, you are outta control.  Are you always so nasty, angry and
   mean spirited?
   Rancho Cucamonga Anger Management Classes
> http://www.yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes

   The Multiverse Of Perception
> http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/09/06/438031629/the-multiverse-of-perception

 > Today, we at 13.7 are honored to host as a guest blogger Nobel
 > Laureate Frank Wilczek, one of the world's leading theoretical
 > physicists. Wilczek won the Nobel Prize for his contributions to our
 > understanding of how quarks behave inside particles called hadrons,
 > of which protons and neutrons are the most familiar. But Wilczek's
 > talents go well beyond that of an amazingly creative physicist. He is
 > also author of countless articles and several books, including The
 > Lightness of Being (2008), Fantastic Realities (2006) and, with his
 > wife Betsy Devine, Longing for the Harmonies (1988). Today, Frank
 > writes about a topic he covers at length in his most recent book, A
 > Beautiful Question: Finding Nature's Deep Design. Published in July,
 > A Beautiful Question is an inspiring meditation on humanity's search
 > for beauty and unity in nature.
 >
 > A Beautiful Question is a long meditation on a single question: Does
 > the world embody beautiful ideas?
 >
 > I thought about this from many angles, bringing in history, art,
 > music, psychology and philosophy as well as physical science. I
 > concluded, after surveying the evidence, with an emphatic "Yes!"
 >
 > But to appreciate the significance of that answer, it's important to
 > ask another question: Might it have been otherwise? Can we imagine
 > that the world might not embody beautiful ideas — that fundamental
 > understanding of how the world works could be messy or unattractive?
 >
 > We can approach those counterfactual questions through thought
 > experiments.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519601

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-09-07 17:56 +0000
Message-ID	<kmv0cc-60c.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#519582

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/7/15 12:05 PM, Nasty name-calling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>  From the bottom of my heart, fuck off and die soon, ass hole.
> 
>   jimp, you are outta control.

What makes you think that, you worthless, cut and paste, spamming
piece of shit?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519720

From	HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-08 06:19 -0400
Message-ID	<msmckl$sgo$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#519556

On 9/7/2015 12:50 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 9/6/15 10:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>> Now, now, ass hole, shove an off topic cut and paste up your ass,
>> you shit headed, cut and paste, off topic spammer.
>>
>
>
>    Wow, jimp--Such out of control anger!  Whoo!
>    See: Rancho Cucamonga Anger Management Classes


You two fighting is about as much fun as going to an all-night dentist.



-- 
Woodland Critters Christmas
https://goo.gl/DysCAl

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519496

From	benj <nobody@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-07 03:42 -0400
Message-ID	<idbHx.41940$YN3.4098@fx07.iad>
In reply to	#519422

On 09/06/2015 06:51 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 9/6/15 5:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>> Meditate on this, you spamming piece of shit:
>>
>
>    What's you problem, jimp? You have no control in your life. Like
>    Pavlov's dog, you cannot stop yourself from disparaging other
>    posters, name calling, and just being down right nasty. I would
>    hate to live your life.
>
>    Try laugh yoga, jimp. Someday you will thank me.
>
>    The Multiverse Of Perception
>> http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/09/06/438031629/the-multiverse-of-perception
>>
>
>  > Today, we at 13.7 are honored to host as a guest blogger Nobel
>  > Laureate Frank Wilczek, one of the world's leading theoretical
>  > physicists. Wilczek won the Nobel Prize for his contributions to our
>  > understanding of how quarks behave inside particles called hadrons,
>  > of which protons and neutrons are the most familiar. But Wilczek's
>  > talents go well beyond that of an amazingly creative physicist. He is
>  > also author of countless articles and several books, including The
>  > Lightness of Being (2008), Fantastic Realities (2006) and, with his
>  > wife Betsy Devine, Longing for the Harmonies (1988). Today, Frank
>  > writes about a topic he covers at length in his most recent book, A
>  > Beautiful Question: Finding Nature's Deep Design. Published in July,
>  > A Beautiful Question is an inspiring meditation on humanity's search
>  > for beauty and unity in nature.
>  >
>  > A Beautiful Question is a long meditation on a single question: Does
>  > the world embody beautiful ideas?
>  >
>  > I thought about this from many angles, bringing in history, art,
>  > music, psychology and philosophy as well as physical science. I
>  > concluded, after surveying the evidence, with an emphatic "Yes!"
>  >
>  > But to appreciate the significance of that answer, it's important to
>  > ask another question: Might it have been otherwise? Can we imagine
>  > that the world might not embody beautiful ideas — that fundamental
>  > understanding of how the world works could be messy or unattractive?
>  >
>  > We can approach those counterfactual questions through thought
>  > experiments.

So, this view makes it clear that the true test of science is always how 
great are our fantasies! The bigger the fantasy the better the science, 
clearly. How could it be otherwise? Of course Sam will tell you that 
"consensus" is another true test of science as well. So even experiment 
is to be just more fantasy. No apparatus needed except that empty space 
between the ears!

Poor Frank Wilczek! He thinks the true test of science is beauty! But he 
does not understand that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. He 
arrogantly thinks that HE and his idea of beauty are the measure of 
everything in the universe. He can't cope with the truth that his wife 
Betsy is ugly and she has a stupid name.
-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519564

From	"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-07 10:03 -0700
Message-ID	<b2a2b050-f05a-47b4-955a-a1da1f23f870@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#519419

On Sunday, September 6, 2015 at 3:46:13 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The Multiverse Of Perception
> 
> Meditate on this, you spamming piece of shit:
> 
>                      /"\
>                     |\./|
>                     |   |
>                     |   |
>                     |   |
>                     |   |
>                  /'\|   |/'\..
>              /~\|   |   |   | \
>             |   =[@]=   |   |  \
>             |   |   |   |   |   \
>             | ~   ~   ~   ~ |`   )
>             |                   /
>              \                 /
>               \               /
>                \    _____    /
>                 |--//''`\--|
>                 | (( +==)) |
>                 |--\_|_//--|
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

Humankind was created by universes so they could see themselves.Without humankind the universes would not relate.All it took to create us was eons of time evolving the right stuff.Wes now know microbes came first,and are keeping humans alive as I type.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519589

From	"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date	2015-09-07 10:27 -0700
Message-ID	<mskhja$1l5$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#519564

<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Swine Glazier "reber g=emc^2" wrote:
>
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The Multiverse Of Perception
> 
Jim Pennino ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Meditate on this, you spamming piece of shit:
> 
>                      /"\
>                     |\./|
>                     |   |
>                     |   |
>                     |   |
>                     |   |
>                  /'\|   |/'\..
>              /~\|   |   |   | \
>             |   =[@]=   |   |  \
>             |   |   |   |   |   \
>             | ~   ~   ~   ~ |`   )
>             |                   /
>              \                 /
>               \               /
>                \    _____    /
>                 |--//''`\--|
>                 | (( +==)) |
>                 |--\_|_//--|
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino
>
Swine Glazier wrote:
<mercifully snipped Swine Glazier's Gutter physics>
Swine Glazier though does deserve Pennino's finger.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520035

From	"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-09 16:43 -0700
Message-ID	<713eca99-b12e-472b-b0d8-8885c7b9f2a1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#519564

On Monday, September 7, 2015 at 10:04:03 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, September 6, 2015 at 3:46:13 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The Multiverse Of Perception
> > 
> > Meditate on this, you spamming piece of shit:
> > 
> >                      /"\
> >                     |\./|
> >                     |   |
> >                     |   |
> >                     |   |
> >                     |   |
> >                  /'\|   |/'\..
> >              /~\|   |   |   | \
> >             |   =[@]=   |   |  \
> >             |   |   |   |   |   \
> >             | ~   ~   ~   ~ |`   )
> >             |                   /
> >              \                 /
> >               \               /
> >                \    _____    /
> >                 |--//''`\--|
> >                 | (( +==)) |
> >                 |--\_|_//--|
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jim Pennino
> 
> Humankind was created by universes so they could see themselves.Without humankind the universes would not relate.All it took to create us was eons of time evolving the right stuff.Wes now know microbes came first,and are keeping humans alive as I type.TreBert

To think the universe is just a rare object in the cosmos is nieve thinking.To think universes are infinite is far out thinking but is reality.Nature deals in big numbers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520040

From	"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-09 17:48 -0700
Message-ID	<b81eee49-2bc0-410b-9287-9758a9ce2674@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#520035

On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 4:43:53 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Monday, September 7, 2015 at 10:04:03 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 6, 2015 at 3:46:13 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > > Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > The Multiverse Of Perception
> > > 
> > > Meditate on this, you spamming piece of shit:
> > > 
> > >                      /"\
> > >                     |\./|
> > >                     |   |
> > >                     |   |
> > >                     |   |
> > >                     |   |
> > >                  /'\|   |/'\..
> > >              /~\|   |   |   | \
> > >             |   =[@]=   |   |  \
> > >             |   |   |   |   |   \
> > >             | ~   ~   ~   ~ |`   )
> > >             |                   /
> > >              \                 /
> > >               \               /
> > >                \    _____    /
> > >                 |--//''`\--|
> > >                 | (( +==)) |
> > >                 |--\_|_//--|
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Jim Pennino
> > 
> > Humankind was created by universes so they could see themselves.Without humankind the universes would not relate.All it took to create us was eons of time evolving the right stuff.Wes now know microbes came first,and are keeping humans alive as I type.TreBert
> 
> To think the universe is just a rare object in the cosmos is nieve thinking.To think universes are infinite is far out thinking but is reality.Nature deals in big numbers.

Can we think of "MINDS" 8.5 billion brains.Each mind thinking of the universe.All those mind eyes(WOW) Each brain having its own world.A world of brain waves.EM brain waves.I hear big imperial thinkers saying stuff that plays with our minds.Words like Probability,simultaneous,superposition,interference,entangulment,coherent etc.  I think the awareness of the brain to observe both large and macroscopic objects,and have a camera to freeze time and measurements is humankinds gift to the universe.I stop light 3 inches,and can show proof.I am just one of the 8.5 brains. Get the picture.  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

csiph-web

The Multiverse Of Perception

Contents

#519407 — The Multiverse Of Perception

#519419

#519422

#519426

#519428

#519440

#519450

#519455

#519465

#519473

#519556

#519573

#519582

#519601

#519720

#519496

#519564

#519589

#520035

#520040