Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #637985 > unrolled thread

Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 17:30 -0700
    Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 20:04 -0700
      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 20:09 -0700
        Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-02 13:08 -0700
          Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-02 14:54 -0700
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-02 14:59 -0700
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-02 15:25 -0700
          Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-02 18:40 -0700
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 15:52 -0700
              Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 01:56 -0700
      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-27 21:05 -0700
        Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 21:26 -0700
          Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-27 22:23 -0700
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-27 22:44 -0700
          Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2017-06-28 09:26 -0400
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-28 13:36 -0700
      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-27 21:34 -0700
        Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 03:23 -0700
          Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 06:06 -0700
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 18:15 -0700
              Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-28 21:22 -0400
                Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 19:18 -0700
                  Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:54 -0400
                    Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:03 -0700
        Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 12:16 -0700
          Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-28 13:49 -0700
          Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 16:18 -0700
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers hanson <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-28 16:46 -0700
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-28 19:48 -0400
    Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2017-06-28 12:01 +0200
      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 03:20 -0700
    Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-02 14:55 -0700
      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-02 15:00 -0700
      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 14:51 -0700
        Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-03 16:34 -0700
        Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 13:54 -0700
          Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-04 14:18 -0700
          Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-04 15:38 -0700
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 14:44 -0700
              Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-05 15:17 -0700
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 14:47 -0700
              Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 22:09 +0000
                Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 13:52 -0700
                  Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-06 14:51 -0700
                  Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 22:22 +0000
              Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-05 15:19 -0700
              Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-05 20:07 -0400
        Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 22:51 -0700
          Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 15:58 -0700
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-05 16:12 -0700
              Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 16:19 -0700
                Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-05 20:12 -0400
                  Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 17:59 -0700
              Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-05 20:10 -0400
            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 01:57 -0700
              Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 11:19 -0700
                Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 16:25 -0700
                  Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 17:53 -0700
                    Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 19:35 -0700
                      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 22:32 -0700
                        Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 09:01 -0700
                          Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 04:12 -0700
                            Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 10:10 -0700
    Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 15:41 -0700
      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-06 16:39 -0700
    Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 13:47 -0700
      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-09 13:50 -0700
      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-07-09 14:29 -0700
        Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 16:47 -0700
      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 03:58 -0700
        Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 10:11 -0700
      Re: Jewish Physics with some questions and video answers Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 10:08 -0700

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#638976

On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 3:38:22 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > 
> > On Monday, July 3, 2017 at 2:51:06 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > > On Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 2:55:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 5:30:43 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > > > > What is this Jewish Physics?
> > > > >
> > > > > I have been told that this is a Nazi term.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it synonymous with Modern Physics? Seeing that the Jews won the last world
> > > > > war and the world before, this seems true.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does one have to be a Jew or an ardent wannabe Jew to qualify as a
> > > > > Jewish Physicist? Are non-Jews automatically exempt from Jewish/Modern Physics?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it compulsory to persecute anyone, deny his findings, abuse and ignore him
> > > > > if he is NOT a Jewish Physicist?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there anywhere anything non-Jewish-Physics to be found that has favour
> > > > > and funding from any wealthy and powerful establishment in the world today?
> > > > >
> > > > > Non-Jewish-Physicists may be interested in my non-Jewish Physics, as shown in
> > > > > the following video films:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
> > > > > IFE - 1 Ground Experiments
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
> > > > > IFE - 2 Experimental setups
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
> > > > > IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
> > > > > IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
> > > > > IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
> > > > > IFE - 6 Spaceship Design
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
> > > > > IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
> > > > > IFE - 8 New Physics
> > > > >
> > > > > My "New Physics" will set the derailed train of Physics back on its
> > > > > tracks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Arindam Banerjee
> > >
> > > I think what this post is telling me is all my theories are "KOSHER"  Kosher means clean.
> 
> 
> If Kosher means clean then why are all the Jewish neigborhoods so
> dirty???? Especially the stores...

Does the word "kosher" come out of Jewish,Yidish,or Hebrew? Jews speak all three,and mix them too. Tricky  Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#638979

reber G=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:

> Does the word "kosher" come out of Jewish,Yidish,or Hebrew? Jews speak all three,and mix them too. Tricky  Trebert

Jewish languages are all the languages and dialects that developed in Jewish
communites in the diaspora, or in other words, there is no such language
as Jewish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_languages#Development_of_Jewish_varieties_of_languages


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639164

On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 3:16:06 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> reber G=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Does the word "kosher" come out of Jewish,Yidish,or Hebrew? Jews speak all three,and mix them too. Tricky  Trebert
> 
> Jewish languages are all the languages and dialects that developed in Jewish
> communites in the diaspora, or in other words, there is no such language
> as Jewish.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_languages#Development_of_Jewish_varieties_of_languages
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

I think Yiddish was spoken by German Jews.It was a form of Jewish,and German.Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639172

All day long "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> 
posts in his <http://tinyurl.com/Blog-of-2-fecal-kikes-Mar2017>
& in a.a & s.p. Swine Glazier brags about his Radical
Extremism of Jewish Supremacy in which Bert posts
about Jews... Jews, Jewish, Jewish, Jewish-shit and
HIS own sorry state, about what he eats & how Glazier
gets drunk & full of cocaine to report the local Temperture
and on Jews... Jews, Jewish, Jewish, Jewish-shit from & by
<http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017> [1], who
is the <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal> 
that causes untold misery to his own ilk. "It's a pity"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639193

reber G=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 3:16:06 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> reber G=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > Does the word "kosher" come out of Jewish,Yidish,or Hebrew? Jews speak all three,and mix them too. Tricky  Trebert
>> 
>> Jewish languages are all the languages and dialects that developed in Jewish
>> communites in the diaspora, or in other words, there is no such language
>> as Jewish.
>> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_languages#Development_of_Jewish_varieties_of_languages
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> I think Yiddish was spoken by German Jews.It was a form of Jewish,and German.Trebert

Yiddish came from Central Europe and is a meld of a bunch of languages.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yiddish

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#638981

"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:fa82050f-8010-4622-b6db-a58fbd3fb505@googlegroups.com...
> On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 3:38:22 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>> >
>> > On Monday, July 3, 2017 at 2:51:06 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>> > > On Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 2:55:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>> > > > On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 5:30:43 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee 
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > What is this Jewish Physics?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I have been told that this is a Nazi term.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Is it synonymous with Modern Physics? Seeing that the Jews won 
>> > > > > the last world
>> > > > > war and the world before, this seems true.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Does one have to be a Jew or an ardent wannabe Jew to qualify as 
>> > > > > a
>> > > > > Jewish Physicist? Are non-Jews automatically exempt from 
>> > > > > Jewish/Modern Physics?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Is it compulsory to persecute anyone, deny his findings, abuse 
>> > > > > and ignore him
>> > > > > if he is NOT a Jewish Physicist?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Is there anywhere anything non-Jewish-Physics to be found that 
>> > > > > has favour
>> > > > > and funding from any wealthy and powerful establishment in the 
>> > > > > world today?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Non-Jewish-Physicists may be interested in my non-Jewish Physics, 
>> > > > > as shown in
>> > > > > the following video films:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
>> > > > > IFE - 1 Ground Experiments
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
>> > > > > IFE - 2 Experimental setups
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
>> > > > > IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
>> > > > > IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
>> > > > > IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
>> > > > > IFE - 6 Spaceship Design
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
>> > > > > IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
>> > > > > IFE - 8 New Physics
>> > > > >
>> > > > > My "New Physics" will set the derailed train of Physics back on 
>> > > > > its
>> > > > > tracks.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > Arindam Banerjee
>> > >
>> > > I think what this post is telling me is all my theories are "KOSHER" 
>> > > Kosher means clean.
>>
>>
>> If Kosher means clean then why are all the Jewish neigborhoods so
>> dirty???? Especially the stores...
>
> Does the word "kosher" come out of Jewish,Yidish,or Hebrew? Jews speak all 
> three,and mix them too. Tricky  Trebert
>
"kosher" simply means that the local rabbi can
make his living of them by extorting a Jewish tax:
<http://www.subvertednation.net/kosher-tax/>,

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639015

On 7/5/2017 5:47 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 3:38:22 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday, July 3, 2017 at 2:51:06 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 2:55:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 5:30:43 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>> What is this Jewish Physics?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been told that this is a Nazi term.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it synonymous with Modern Physics? Seeing that the Jews won the last world
>>>>>> war and the world before, this seems true.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does one have to be a Jew or an ardent wannabe Jew to qualify as a
>>>>>> Jewish Physicist? Are non-Jews automatically exempt from Jewish/Modern Physics?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it compulsory to persecute anyone, deny his findings, abuse and ignore him
>>>>>> if he is NOT a Jewish Physicist?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there anywhere anything non-Jewish-Physics to be found that has favour
>>>>>> and funding from any wealthy and powerful establishment in the world today?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Non-Jewish-Physicists may be interested in my non-Jewish Physics, as shown in
>>>>>> the following video films:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
>>>>>> IFE - 1 Ground Experiments
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
>>>>>> IFE - 2 Experimental setups
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
>>>>>> IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
>>>>>> IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
>>>>>> IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
>>>>>> IFE - 6 Spaceship Design
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
>>>>>> IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
>>>>>> IFE - 8 New Physics
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My "New Physics" will set the derailed train of Physics back on its
>>>>>> tracks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee
>>>>
>>>> I think what this post is telling me is all my theories are "KOSHER"  Kosher means clean.
>>
>>
>> If Kosher means clean then why are all the Jewish neigborhoods so
>> dirty???? Especially the stores...
> 
> Does the word "kosher" come out of Jewish,Yidish,or Hebrew? Jews speak all three,and mix them too. Tricky  Trebert
> 
SmellBert you ignorant face-sitting graveyard vandal, that thing in 
front of your senile face at the senior center is called a computer. You 
can use it to look shit up when your brain is tool dumb or drunk to know 
the answer.

Kosher meaning clean today comes from the Hebrew work "kasher" which 
means "proper" or "Lawful". Just which language do you call speaking 
Jewish? Is that when you lie? Cripes you are so far gone this goy is a 
better Jew than you!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#638872

On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 7:51:06 AM UTC+10, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 2:55:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 5:30:43 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > > What is this Jewish Physics?
> > > 
> > > I have been told that this is a Nazi term.
> > > 
> > > Is it synonymous with Modern Physics? Seeing that the Jews won the last world
> > > war and the world before, this seems true.
> > > 
> > > Does one have to be a Jew or an ardent wannabe Jew to qualify as a 
> > > Jewish Physicist? Are non-Jews automatically exempt from Jewish/Modern Physics?
> > > 
> > > Is it compulsory to persecute anyone, deny his findings, abuse and ignore him
> > > if he is NOT a Jewish Physicist?
> > > 
> > > Is there anywhere anything non-Jewish-Physics to be found that has favour
> > > and funding from any wealthy and powerful establishment in the world today?
> > > 
> > > Non-Jewish-Physicists may be interested in my non-Jewish Physics, as shown in
> > > the following video films:
> > > 
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
> > > IFE - 1 Ground Experiments
> > > 
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
> > > IFE - 2 Experimental setups
> > > 
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
> > > IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments
> > > 
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
> > > IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship
> > > 
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
> > > IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network
> > > 
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
> > > IFE - 6 Spaceship Design
> > > 
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
> > > IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity
> > > 
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
> > > IFE - 8 New Physics
> > > 
> > > My "New Physics" will set the derailed train of Physics back on its
> > > tracks.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Arindam Banerjee
> 
> I think what this post is telling me is all my theories are "KOSHER"  

If by "my" you mean me as opposed to yourself, then yes my theories:

1. energy is always getting created and destroyed
2. it is possible to accelerate a body purely by its internal energy
3. under the mechanism of 2. it is possible to accelerate the body to any 
speed way beyond the speed of light
4. we can have motors that can deliver unlimited energy without any external
source of energy
5. the centre of a large body (Sun, Earth) that has a magnetic field is very
cold so as to support the superconducting currents causing the magnetic field
6. It is possible and highly desirable to construct a Hydrogen Transmission
Network that will make it possible to provide 7*24 energy everywhere when all
the renewable sources are turned into hydrogen and pumped into the network
(pipes, buffers)
7. Global warming is caused by the jet exhaust of CO2 into the upper atmosphere and the only way to stop it is Internal Force Engines run on H and O.
8. The speed of light varies with the speed of the emitter of light
9. Racists and Bigots on one hand, and reverse-racist suckups on the other, are
the biggest public enemies as the stop the theores 1-8 above, simply because
they think they will look very foolish when the world finds them kosher or
sound or wholesome

are indeed kosher and sound and wholesome and should be adopted by Jews and non-Jews, especially if we want to

a) avoid being hit by a large asteroid or comet
b) want to be at least millionaires with a terrific standard of living, and
by "we" I mean everyone
c) provide the best for all that is animal, mineral and vegetable.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee


>Kosher means clean.That fits  TreBert If I'm a Jew that makes Treb Jewish.That begs the question.Can a computer be Jewish? I'm got very Jewish to be honest.I do have my G=EMC^2,but I go with "G" for gravity.Gravity and God are both at the bottom line.Both are unknows.Both go to infinity.Both touch all that is.Both can not be blocked. Get the picture TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#638992

On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 10:51:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> > I think what this post is telling me is all my theories are "KOSHER"  
> 
> If by "my" you mean me as opposed to yourself, then yes my theories:
> 
> 1. energy is always getting created and destroyed

How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?

> 2. it is possible to accelerate a body purely by its internal energy

How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?

> 3. under the mechanism of 2. it is possible to accelerate the body to any 
> speed way beyond the speed of light

Really?  How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?


> 4. we can have motors that can deliver unlimited energy without any external
> source of energy

Really?  How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?


> 5. the centre of a large body (Sun, Earth) that has a magnetic field is very
> cold so as to support the superconducting currents causing the magnetic field

Why do you believe this?  


> 6. It is possible and highly desirable to construct a Hydrogen Transmission
> Network that will make it possible to provide 7*24 energy everywhere when all
> the renewable sources are turned into hydrogen and pumped into the network
> (pipes, buffers)

So what.  Hydrogen needs energy to be created. So it's no big benefit.

> 7. Global warming is caused by the jet exhaust of CO2 into the upper atmosphere and the only way to stop it is Internal Force Engines run on H and O.

I am a climate scientist. Global warming is a BS science.  It's all propaganda. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#638995

On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 3:58:59 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 10:51:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> > 2. it is possible to accelerate a body purely by its internal energy
> 
> How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?

Well, I can certainly accelerate my own body using nothing but my own internal energy... can't you?

> I am a climate scientist. Global warming is a BS science.  It's all propaganda.

No, you are no kind of scientist at all! 

Climate change is a well documented phenomena.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639000

On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 4:12:38 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 3:58:59 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 10:51:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> 
> > > 2. it is possible to accelerate a body purely by its internal energy
> > 
> > How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> 
> Well, I can certainly accelerate my own body using nothing but my own internal energy... can't you?
> 
> > I am a climate scientist. Global warming is a BS science.  It's all propaganda.
> 
> No, you are no kind of scientist at all! 
> 
> Climate change is a well documented phenomena.

Climate change is political fad.  It's pure pseudoscience.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639017

On 7/5/2017 7:19 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 4:12:38 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 3:58:59 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 10:51:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>
>>>> 2. it is possible to accelerate a body purely by its internal energy
>>>
>>> How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
>>
>> Well, I can certainly accelerate my own body using nothing but my own internal energy... can't you?
>>
>>> I am a climate scientist. Global warming is a BS science.  It's all propaganda.
>>
>> No, you are no kind of scientist at all!
>>
>> Climate change is a well documented phenomena.
> 
> Climate change is political fad.  It's pure pseudoscience.
> 
More than a political fad, it's a calculated political fraud designed to 
create an excuse to sock everyone with a huge energy tax to "save the 
children". Trillions of dollars sucked in and then given to Third World 
hell holes to waste. This is truth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639030

On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 5:13:09 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> On 7/5/2017 7:19 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 4:12:38 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 3:58:59 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 10:51:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> >>
> >>>> 2. it is possible to accelerate a body purely by its internal energy
> >>>
> >>> How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> >>
> >> Well, I can certainly accelerate my own body using nothing but my own internal energy... can't you?
> >>
> >>> I am a climate scientist. Global warming is a BS science.  It's all propaganda.
> >>
> >> No, you are no kind of scientist at all!
> >>
> >> Climate change is a well documented phenomena.
> > 
> > Climate change is political fad.  It's pure pseudoscience.
> > 
> More than a political fad, it's a calculated political fraud designed to 
> create an excuse to sock everyone with a huge energy tax to "save the 
> children". Trillions of dollars sucked in and then given to Third World 
> hell holes to waste. This is truth.

Tell Pnal what a fucking retard he is to believe it.  I haven't believed it since I looked into it way back in 2006.

And then I tore every believer in alt.global-warming a new asshole.

Yes, it's true Benj, until I started postig on alt.global-warming they were winning the argument!  After a few months of my asking questions they created "real science" website and stop posting on alt.global-warming.

I am the one that got the ball rolling on AGW skepticism (on the internet) way back in 2006!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639016

On 7/5/2017 7:12 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 3:58:59 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 10:51:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> 
>>> 2. it is possible to accelerate a body purely by its internal energy
>>
>> How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> 
> Well, I can certainly accelerate my own body using nothing but my own internal energy... can't you?
> 
>> I am a climate scientist. Global warming is a BS science.  It's all propaganda.
> 
> No, you are no kind of scientist at all!
> 
> Climate change is a well documented phenomena.
> 
Yeah, well documented fraud phenomena.
When scientists sell out they don't start telling the truth. Quite the 
opposite. I take it you are one of those non-science morons who thinks 
science is determined by a majority democratic vote.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639088

On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 8:58:59 AM UTC+10, James McGinn wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 10:51:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> 
> > > I think what this post is telling me is all my theories are "KOSHER"  
> > 
> > If by "my" you mean me as opposed to yourself, then yes my theories:
> > 
> > 1. energy is always getting created and destroyed
> 
> How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg 
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s 
IFE - 2 Experimental setups 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno 
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws 
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU 
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc 
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA 
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY 
IFE - 8 New Physics 
> 
> > 2. it is possible to accelerate a body purely by its internal energy
> 
> How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> 
> > 3. under the mechanism of 2. it is possible to accelerate the body to any 
> > speed way beyond the speed of light
> 
> Really?  How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> 
> 
> > 4. we can have motors that can deliver unlimited energy without any external
> > source of energy
> 
> Really?  How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> 
> 
> > 5. the centre of a large body (Sun, Earth) that has a magnetic field is very
> > cold so as to support the superconducting currents causing the magnetic field
> 
> Why do you believe this?  
> 
> 
> > 6. It is possible and highly desirable to construct a Hydrogen Transmission
> > Network that will make it possible to provide 7*24 energy everywhere when all
> > the renewable sources are turned into hydrogen and pumped into the network
> > (pipes, buffers)
> 
> So what.  Hydrogen needs energy to be created. So it's no big benefit.
> 
> > 7. Global warming is caused by the jet exhaust of CO2 into the upper atmosphere and the only way to stop it is Internal Force Engines run on H and O.
> 
> I am a climate scientist. Global warming is a BS science.  It's all propaganda.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639130

On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 1:57:26 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 8:58:59 AM UTC+10, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 10:51:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > 
> > > > I think what this post is telling me is all my theories are "KOSHER"  
> > > 
> > > If by "my" you mean me as opposed to yourself, then yes my theories:
> > > 
> > > 1. energy is always getting created and destroyed
> > 
> > How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg 
> IFE - 1 Ground Experiments 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s 
> IFE - 2 Experimental setups 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno 
> IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws 
> IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU 
> IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc 
> IFE - 6 Spaceship Design 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA 
> IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY 
> IFE - 8 New Physics 
> > 
> > > 2. it is possible to accelerate a body purely by its internal energy
> > 
> > How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> > 
> > > 3. under the mechanism of 2. it is possible to accelerate the body to any 
> > > speed way beyond the speed of light
> > 
> > Really?  How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> > 
> > 
> > > 4. we can have motors that can deliver unlimited energy without any external
> > > source of energy
> > 
> > Really?  How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> > 
> > 
> > > 5. the centre of a large body (Sun, Earth) that has a magnetic field is very
> > > cold so as to support the superconducting currents causing the magnetic field
> > 
> > Why do you believe this?  
> > 
> > 
> > > 6. It is possible and highly desirable to construct a Hydrogen Transmission
> > > Network that will make it possible to provide 7*24 energy everywhere when all
> > > the renewable sources are turned into hydrogen and pumped into the network
> > > (pipes, buffers)
> > 
> > So what.  Hydrogen needs energy to be created. So it's no big benefit.
> > 
> > > 7. Global warming is caused by the jet exhaust of CO2 into the upper atmosphere and the only way to stop it is Internal Force Engines run on H and O.
> > 
> > I am a climate scientist. Global warming is a BS science.  It's all propaganda.

You appear to be perfectly clueless about market realities.  Unless you can produce products that people will buy and implement you won't have the resources to develop any of this.

You seem to think you've made some breakthrough.  You haven't.  All the things you discuss have already been researched.  You are not adding anything new.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639202

On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 4:19:14 AM UTC+10, James McGinn wrote:
> On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 1:57:26 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 8:58:59 AM UTC+10, James McGinn wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 10:51:18 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > I think what this post is telling me is all my theories are "KOSHER"  
> > > > 
> > > > If by "my" you mean me as opposed to yourself, then yes my theories:
> > > > 
> > > > 1. energy is always getting created and destroyed
> > > 
> > > How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> > 
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg 
> > IFE - 1 Ground Experiments 
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s 
> > IFE - 2 Experimental setups 
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno 
> > IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments 
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws 
> > IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship 
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU 
> > IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network 
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc 
> > IFE - 6 Spaceship Design 
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA 
> > IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity 
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY 
> > IFE - 8 New Physics 
> > > 
> > > > 2. it is possible to accelerate a body purely by its internal energy
> > > 
> > > How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> > > 
> > > > 3. under the mechanism of 2. it is possible to accelerate the body to any 
> > > > speed way beyond the speed of light
> > > 
> > > Really?  How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 4. we can have motors that can deliver unlimited energy without any external
> > > > source of energy
> > > 
> > > Really?  How so?  Do you have any experimental evidence?  Argument?  Anything?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 5. the centre of a large body (Sun, Earth) that has a magnetic field is very
> > > > cold so as to support the superconducting currents causing the magnetic field
> > > 
> > > Why do you believe this?  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 6. It is possible and highly desirable to construct a Hydrogen Transmission
> > > > Network that will make it possible to provide 7*24 energy everywhere when all
> > > > the renewable sources are turned into hydrogen and pumped into the network
> > > > (pipes, buffers)
> > > 
> > > So what.  Hydrogen needs energy to be created. So it's no big benefit.
> > > 
> > > > 7. Global warming is caused by the jet exhaust of CO2 into the upper atmosphere and the only way to stop it is Internal Force Engines run on H and O.
> > > 
> > > I am a climate scientist. Global warming is a BS science.  It's all propaganda.
> 
> You appear to be perfectly clueless about market realities.  Unless you can produce products that people will buy and implement you won't have the resources to develop any of this.
> 
> You seem to think you've made some breakthrough.  You haven't.  All the things you discuss have already been researched.  You are not adding anything new.


My work is totally new and original.  I have followed the true scientific
tradition and presented my new findings clearly and openly; performed new
experiments never done before, got the data from the experiments in manners
that are transparent, used accepted equations upon the data to come to 
conclusions, showed the scope of the new findings, how they improve our
understanding of the laws of Nature. No one has done this before. No one has
made such films of original work as I have and presented them in a way the
whole world can see and judge. This is a very new way to present absolutely
ground-breaking research. And why not, this discovery is as useful and the
discovery of fire and the discovery of the wheel. And the inventions following
from this discovery are astounding - they will lead to unlimited energy and 
very fast motion with the new motors.

I have no doubt that sooner or later people will understand and appreciate
all that I have done and presented in my video films.

It is true that the modern physics establishments is run by conjectural
pseudo-scientists. My works upset them, so getting a negative reaction is a
first reaction from them, not unexpected. Had they been genuinely scientific,
they would not have gone through this phase of denial.

What is satisfying to me is the low quality of their reaction - ad hominem
attacks, blind dismissal, meaningless technical points, etc. NO one even 
wants to repeat the experiments with better equipment to get even more
striking results, and that itself tells the story.  They don't want to know
that I am right, so they will ignore, twist, etc.

Well, fortunately the usenet and internet are open media and honest and 
intelligent people can come to their own conclusions about my work if they are
also open minded and not political. My videos are very clear and open, and that
in itself should be wonderful in the most murky world of theoretical physics.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639220

On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 4:25:33 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> They don't want to know
> that I am right, so they will ignore, twist, etc.

You are scattered, and vague. You seem to not have a point as much as you have a philosophy.  

> Well, fortunately the usenet and internet are open media and honest and 
> intelligent people can come to their own conclusions about my work if they are
> also open minded and not political.

You also seem incredibly naive.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639249

Okay i will present yhe video films with more texts and details in this and other newsgroups. It is evident thst i hsve overestimated the vapacity of the audience.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639265

On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 12:35:21 PM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> Okay i will present yhe video films with more texts and details in this and other newsgroups. It is evident thst i hsve overestimated the vapacity of the audience.

I meant "capacity" above; but the "vapacity" when meaning "vapid capacity" is 
something I have underestimated.  A dull audience, such as found here, is indeed
a curse; but then there are the future generations to think of, and of course
the Gods and Goddesses to Whom all good endeavour has to be dedicated.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web