Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #522738 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-22 17:45 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-27 11:38 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 157 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 17:45 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Rocky@Lying.Squirrel.com - 2015-09-22 20:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-22 23:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 07:47 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:46 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:54 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 12:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 14:13 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 13:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 15:18 -0400
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> Admits he posts lies and False Videos. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 18:11 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 15:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 17:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 19:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-23 21:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 22:51 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-24 09:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 09:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:19 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 17:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 04:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 10:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-24 18:16 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 17:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 20:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-25 05:39 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 08:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-25 15:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 16:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-26 05:52 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 17:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-26 11:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 21:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 05:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 06:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 09:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 05:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-25 14:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 13:42 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-26 05:49 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 11:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:25 -0500
things that **** y'go noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 16:24 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-25 10:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-26 11:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-26 13:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-26 18:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-26 23:22 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-26 20:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:50 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 01:38 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 05:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 09:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 17:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 10:36 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-27 17:15 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-27 23:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 19:27 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-28 01:55 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 22:29 -0500
why not ask wTf not noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 12:41 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 03:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-28 16:20 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 12:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-28 19:58 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 06:30 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 17:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-28 22:15 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 17:33 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 19:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-29 04:52 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 11:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 15:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 15:26 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 17:48 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-03 15:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-04 20:00 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 17:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-04 23:02 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 04:07 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 03:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 16:19 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 11:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-05 18:08 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 12:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:20 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-07 09:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-04 17:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 07:43 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 08:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 10:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 18:42 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 03:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 18:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 21:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-28 13:32 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 14:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-28 22:20 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 17:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 17:54 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 03:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 09:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:32 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 17:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-26 20:51 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 07:54 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 08:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 10:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:40 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 10:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:48 -0400
Re: Rocky's latest obsession jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 18:03 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 17:56 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:49 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-27 14:13 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 10:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-27 17:17 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-28 19:58 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 06:30 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-28 13:37 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 09:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-29 12:55 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-28 17:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-29 12:55 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:01 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-29 15:25 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 08:05 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 09:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:49 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 18:17 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 21:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 12:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:46 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 11:38 -0500
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 09:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3071bfc9c07e79b798c2e6@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #523412 |
In article <oipf0b9dgvnf4anuln49vt6913t6kbdji9@4ax.com>, ninety7gt@cox.net says... > > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:54:24 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > > > > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> <SIGH> > >>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at > >>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. > >>>> > >>>> Yes I have. > >>>> > >>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building > >>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. > >>>> > >>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy > >>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. > >>>> > >>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: > >>>> > >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the > >>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has > >>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small > >>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail > >>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around > >>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of > >>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once > >>>>> > >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Lets see > >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the > >>> Pentagon. " > >>> > >> > >> That's right. Had you actually watched the video you would have > >> heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT > >> of the Pentagon. > >> > >> One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. > >> > >>> Ya,.... I can work with that > >>> ....NO PLANE > >>> > >> > >> You'd be better working with the truth as the reporter stated .... > >> > >> " ...the entire plane crashed into the side of > >> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " > >> > >> > >> If Roger Rocky is smart he'll dump your butt because every discussion > >> you get involved with you lose for the Troofers. > >> > >> This is the THIRD claim you've made which has been proven to be FALSE. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >This is the video you should be referring to > > 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > > > > That's the one. > > > > > >You now claim the anchor in the studio knows better what happened than the > >reporter on scene ??? > > Had you actually watched the video you would have > heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT > of the Pentagon. > > One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. > > > > >Why ?,.....becuase she's reading from the ofiicial fairytale script, and he > >only can go by what he actually sees ? > > The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: > > " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the > Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has > crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are > small enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large > tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere > around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the > side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. > > > You lose every time you post. You don't even read and/or listen to > the cites you link. Bast is a trur believer in Trooerism. No matter how insane, how ridiculous, how goofy the claim made is, she believes. She will ignore all signs that show what she's going to post is incorrect, she keeps on believin' in the Troof. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 13:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <l3ag0bteb4glihp244tmplf7ihrbc5c5fe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523423 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:57:19 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote: >In article <oipf0b9dgvnf4anuln49vt6913t6kbdji9@4ax.com>, >ninety7gt@cox.net says... >> >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:54:24 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> >> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> >>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> <SIGH> >> >>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >> >>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >> >>>> >> >>>> Yes I have. >> >>>> >> >>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >> >>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >> >>>> >> >>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >> >>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >> >>>> >> >>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >> >>>> >> >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >> >>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >> >>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >> >>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >> >>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >> >>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >> >>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >> >>>>> >> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Lets see >> >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >> >>> Pentagon. " >> >>> >> >> >> >> That's right. Had you actually watched the video you would have >> >> heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT >> >> of the Pentagon. >> >> >> >> One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. >> >> >> >>> Ya,.... I can work with that >> >>> ....NO PLANE >> >>> >> >> >> >> You'd be better working with the truth as the reporter stated .... >> >> >> >> " ...the entire plane crashed into the side of >> >> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " >> >> >> >> >> >> If Roger Rocky is smart he'll dump your butt because every discussion >> >> you get involved with you lose for the Troofers. >> >> >> >> This is the THIRD claim you've made which has been proven to be FALSE. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >This is the video you should be referring to >> > 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >> > >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >> > >> >> That's the one. >> >> >> > >> >You now claim the anchor in the studio knows better what happened than the >> >reporter on scene ??? >> >> Had you actually watched the video you would have >> heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT >> of the Pentagon. >> >> One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. >> >> >> >> >Why ?,.....becuase she's reading from the ofiicial fairytale script, and he >> >only can go by what he actually sees ? >> >> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >> >> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are >> small enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large >> tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere >> around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the >> side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >> >> >> You lose every time you post. You don't even read and/or listen to >> the cites you link. > >Bast is a trur believer in Trooerism. No matter how insane, how >ridiculous, how goofy the claim made is, she believes. She will ignore >all signs that show what she's going to post is incorrect, she keeps on >believin' in the Troof. You'd think that she'd stop posting the video which proves she's a kook, a liar, and a dope. Troofers are all self destructive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 10:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mu8tc7$fro$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523412 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:54:24 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>> >>>>> Yes I have. >>>>> >>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the >>>>> Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>> >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that >>>>> has crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see >>>>> are small enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no >>>>> large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that >>>>> anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed >>>>> into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Lets see >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. " >>>> >>> >>> That's right. Had you actually watched the video you would have >>> heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT >>> of the Pentagon. >>> >>> One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. >>> >>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>> ....NO PLANE >>>> >>> >>> You'd be better working with the truth as the reporter stated .... >>> >>> " ...the entire plane crashed into the side of >>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " >>> >>> >>> If Roger Rocky is smart he'll dump your butt because every discussion >>> you get involved with you lose for the Troofers. >>> >>> This is the THIRD claim you've made which has been proven to be FALSE. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> This is the video you should be referring to >> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >> > > That's the one. > > >> >> You now claim the anchor in the studio knows better what happened than >> the reporter on scene ??? > > Had you actually watched the video you would have > heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT > of the Pentagon. > > One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. > > > >> Why ?,.....becuase she's reading from the ofiicial fairytale script, >> and he only can go by what he actually sees ? > > The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: > > " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the > Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has > crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are > small enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large > tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere > around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the > side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. > > > You lose every time you post. You don't even read and/or listen to > the cites you link. "nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " <ROTFLMAO> Even when you wrongly edit it, and it's right in front of you, you still deny it. I do have to give you credit for tenacity,....., although you lose twice the credit for comprehension. ......Perhaps an English as a second language course, would be of benefit to you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 13:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <v7ag0b184u8vpa24cotgap98i20dupl616@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523432 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:12:12 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:54:24 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes I have. >>>>>> >>>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the >>>>>> Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>>> >>>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that >>>>>> has crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see >>>>>> are small enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no >>>>>> large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that >>>>>> anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed >>>>>> into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Lets see >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. " >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's right. Had you actually watched the video you would have >>>> heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT >>>> of the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. >>>> >>>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>>> ....NO PLANE >>>>> >>>> >>>> You'd be better working with the truth as the reporter stated .... >>>> >>>> " ...the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " >>>> >>>> >>>> If Roger Rocky is smart he'll dump your butt because every discussion >>>> you get involved with you lose for the Troofers. >>>> >>>> This is the THIRD claim you've made which has been proven to be FALSE. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This is the video you should be referring to >>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>> >> >> That's the one. >> >> >>> >>> You now claim the anchor in the studio knows better what happened than >>> the reporter on scene ??? >> >> Had you actually watched the video you would have >> heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT >> of the Pentagon. >> >> One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. >> >> >> >>> Why ?,.....becuase she's reading from the ofiicial fairytale script, >>> and he only can go by what he actually sees ? >> >> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >> >> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are >> small enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large >> tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere >> around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the >> side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >> >> >> You lose every time you post. You don't even read and/or listen to >> the cites you link. > > > > > > > > >"nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire >plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to >collapse. " "....which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " ><ROTFLMAO> >Even when you wrongly edit it, and it's right in front of you, you still >deny it. I didn't edit anything. The text I posted was verbatim from the video cite YOU keep giving us. >I do have to give you credit for tenacity,....., although you lose twice the >credit for comprehension. > > >......Perhaps an English as a second language course, would be of benefit to >you. > I've left the above in so every one can view your lunacy. Yer welcome. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 10:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hqCdnTa1Ee9fkpXLnZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #523409 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mu8la8$8ks$1@dont-email.me... > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> <SIGH> >>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>> >>>> Yes I have. >>>> >>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>> >>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>> >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>> >>>> >>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Lets see >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>> Pentagon. " >>> >> >> That's right. Had you actually watched the video you would have >> heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT >> of the Pentagon. >> >> One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. >> >>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>> ....NO PLANE >>> >> >> You'd be better working with the truth as the reporter stated .... >> >> " ...the entire plane crashed into the side of >> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " >> >> >> If Roger Rocky is smart he'll dump your butt because every discussion >> you get involved with you lose for the Troofers. That is because you inconsistanites don't even know what truth is. >> This is the THIRD claim you've made which has been proven to be FALSE. And yet it is you that lies so much I don't even bother to look at your post unless if Bast replies to them. > > > > > > > This is the video you should be referring to > 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ I must have seen that because I remember thinking the exact same thing. Too bad he was right. > > > You now claim the anchor in the studio knows better what happened than the > reporter on scene ??? > > Why ?,.....becuase she's reading from the ofiicial fairytale script, and > he only can go by what he actually sees ? > > > > You have been proven wrong well over 40 times already. (I have actually > lost count) > 9/11 was an inside job, and nothing you have said here will ever convince > people otherwise Not only that 9/11 was a nuclear event that even passes the duck test. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 13:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <gsag0b5ar6f8pkm0r0eg1cu4vf5fjh82gd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523441 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:51:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >news:mu8la8$8ks$1@dont-email.me... >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>> >>>>> Yes I have. >>>>> >>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>> >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Lets see >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. " >>>> >>> >>> That's right. Had you actually watched the video you would have >>> heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT >>> of the Pentagon. >>> >>> One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. >>> >>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>> ....NO PLANE >>>> >>> >>> You'd be better working with the truth as the reporter stated .... >>> >>> " ...the entire plane crashed into the side of >>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " >>> >>> >>> If Roger Rocky is smart he'll dump your butt because every discussion >>> you get involved with you lose for the Troofers. > >That is because you inconsistanites don't even know what truth is. Can you explain to the audience here why Bast keeps posting a video link which contradicts your Troofer's agenda? Is she really that stupid? Are you? >> This is the video you should be referring to >> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > You'll find it absolutely says the plane went into the Pentagon. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 18:03 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's latest obsession |
| Message-ID | <kknldc-an1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #523441 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > Not only that 9/11 was a nuclear event that even passes the duck test. Rocky's latest delusion just shows once again just how delusional Rocky is. Rocky only knows what a duck looks, sounds, and walks like if he has a doctored youtube video to guide him. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 15:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <10mg0b1kvh96jkkk2pga1t910enk1mc5m4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523441 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:51:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[snip to focus on Rocky's revelation about himself]
>> This is the video you should be referring to
>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ
>
>I must have seen that because I remember thinking the exact same thing. Too
>bad he was right.
Please note that Roger is admitting a plane did hit the Pentagon.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-26 17:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <416c76a9-786f-469f-9603-6ea5064675a7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #523314 |
totally different (massive concrete constuction from the towers; so, different kind of impact > > enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail > > sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around > > which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of > > the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. > > > > > >> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once > >> > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > > > > > > Lets see > " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the > Pentagon. " > > > Ya,.... I can work with that > ....NO PLANE
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-26 20:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hche0b95ocneohbvjskrd2de868dkd7f01@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523314 |
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> <SIGH>
>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the
>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured.
>>
>> Yes I have.
>>
>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building
>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash.
>>
>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy
>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon.
>>
>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video:
>>
>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the
>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has
>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small
>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail
>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around
>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of
>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
>>
>>
>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ
>
>
>Lets see
>" there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the
>Pentagon. "
>
>
>Ya,.... I can work with that
>....NO PLANE
>
Crashed anywhere *near* the Pentagon. It crashed *into* the
Pentagon. This is what the reporter said.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 09:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3071bdf2d376f09398c2e5@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #523314 |
In article <mu77lk$5tt$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> <SIGH> > >> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the > >> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. > > > > Yes I have. > > > >> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building > >> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. > > > > Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy > > Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. > > > > The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: > > > > " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the > > Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has > > crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small > > enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail > > sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around > > which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of > > the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. > > > > > >> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once > >> > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > > > > > > Lets see > " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the > Pentagon. " > > > Ya,.... I can work with that > ....NO PLANE I can work with that too.. Bast = No mind. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 14:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #523314 |
Bast wrote: > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> <SIGH> >>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the >>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >> >> Yes I have. >> >>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >> >> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >> >> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >> >> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >> >> >>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > > > > > > Lets see > " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the > Pentagon. " > > > Ya,.... I can work with that > ....NO PLANE There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find out where the fourth plane was. Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 10:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8eudnRQnO5x3lJXLnZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #523434 |
"jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... > Bast wrote: >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> <SIGH> >>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the >>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>> >>> Yes I have. >>> >>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>> >>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>> >>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>> >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>> >>> >>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >> >> >> >> >> >> Lets see >> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >> Pentagon. " >> >> >> Ya,.... I can work with that >> ....NO PLANE > > There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find > out where the fourth plane was. > > Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was needed to force them to land in Cleveland. They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two flights were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add fake planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 17:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mu94mv$buj$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523436 |
On 27/09/2015 16:26, Rocky wrote: > "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message > news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >> Bast wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> <SIGH> >>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the >>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>> >>>> Yes I have. >>>> >>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>> >>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>> >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>> >>>> >>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Lets see >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>> Pentagon. " >>> >>> >>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>> ....NO PLANE >> >> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >> out where the fourth plane was. >> >> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? > > There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was > needed to force them to land in Cleveland. > > They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two flights > were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. > Your proof of this please, don't post a you tube, use your own words. > It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon > were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we > were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. > > And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add fake > planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are > identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 19:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <muc2h5$r9n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523446 |
On 27/09/2015 17:17, Tony Dragon wrote: > On 27/09/2015 16:26, Rocky wrote: >> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >> news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >>> Bast wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>> the >>>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>> >>>>> Yes I have. >>>>> >>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>> >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Lets see >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. " >>>> >>>> >>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>> ....NO PLANE >>> >>> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >>> out where the fourth plane was. >>> >>> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? >> >> There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was >> needed to force them to land in Cleveland. >> >> They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two >> flights >> were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. >> > > Your proof of this please, don't post a you tube, use your own words. Still waiting for an answer. > >> It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon >> were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we >> were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. >> >> And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add >> fake >> planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are >> identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test >> >> Rocky >> >> > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > http://www.avast.com > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 06:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mud7i8$das$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523608 |
On 28/09/2015 19:58, Tony Dragon wrote: > On 27/09/2015 17:17, Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 27/09/2015 16:26, Rocky wrote: >>> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >>> news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >>>> Bast wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes I have. >>>>>> >>>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>>> >>>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are >>>>>> small >>>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere >>>>>> around >>>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Lets see >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. " >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>>> ....NO PLANE >>>> >>>> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >>>> out where the fourth plane was. >>>> >>>> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? >>> >>> There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was >>> needed to force them to land in Cleveland. >>> >>> They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two >>> flights >>> were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. >>> >> >> Your proof of this please, don't post a you tube, use your own words. > > > Still waiting for an answer. No answer, as expected, Rocky running away again. > >> >>> It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon >>> were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we >>> were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. >>> >>> And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add >>> fake >>> planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are >>> identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> http://www.avast.com >> > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > http://www.avast.com > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 15:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <eulg0bdnemd7oserp9endm29ojavdnk9om@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523436 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:26:19 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com...
>> Bast wrote:
>>>
>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> <SIGH>
>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the
>>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured.
>>>>
>>>> Yes I have.
>>>>
>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building
>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy
>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon.
>>>>
>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video:
>>>>
>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the
>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has
>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small
>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail
>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around
>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of
>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lets see
>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the
>>> Pentagon. "
>>>
>>>
>>> Ya,.... I can work with that
>>> ....NO PLANE
>>
>> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find
>> out where the fourth plane was.
>>
>> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes?
>
>There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was
>needed to force them to land in Cleveland.
>
Neither flight landed in Cleveland.
>They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two flights
>were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01.
>
Yet, they were scheduled to fly and did so.
Odd that.
>It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon
>were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we
>were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets.
And yet, as of the time I write this, you've offered nothing to
support, let alone prove your delusions to be the truth.
>
>And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add fake
>planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are
>identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test
>
Not to the mentally sound. But then, you truly are mentally ill.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 13:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM000520CF0724CE8B@aca42ed4.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #523436 |
Rocky wrote: > > "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message > news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >> Bast wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> <SIGH> >>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the >>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>> >>>> Yes I have. >>>> >>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>> >>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>> >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>> >>>> >>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Lets see >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>> Pentagon. " >>> >>> >>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>> ....NO PLANE >> >> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >> out where the fourth plane was. >> >> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? > > There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was > needed to force them to land in Cleveland. How were they forced to land? There wasn't a scramble ordered. > > They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two flights > were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. > > It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon > were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we > were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. > > And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add fake > planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are > identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test So how do you explain the fact that I watched the second plane crash into the Tower on live TV? /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 09:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <FfadnQj2xdjCzZTLnZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #523565 |
"jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message news:PM000520CF0724CE8B@aca42ed4.ipt.aol.com... > Rocky wrote: >> >> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >> news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >>> Bast wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>> the >>>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>> >>>>> Yes I have. >>>>> >>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>> >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Lets see >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. " >>>> >>>> >>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>> ....NO PLANE >>> >>> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >>> out where the fourth plane was. >>> >>> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? >> >> There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was >> needed to force them to land in Cleveland. > > How were they forced to land? There wasn't a scramble ordered. Maybe the pilots were handed a note before they even took off that they would have to change their flght number in mid air and then land at Cleveland. >> They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two >> flights >> were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. >> >> It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon >> were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we >> were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. >> >> And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add >> fake >> planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are >> identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test > > > So how do you explain the fact that I watched the second plane crash into > the Tower on live TV? BULLSHIT you never saw a crash. All you saw was identical to a CGI flying into a building with no crash dynamics whatsoever. The CGIs never slowed down and never shed any parts either. And the parts they claimed to have found were planted just like parts were planted at both the Pentagon and Pranksville, PA. And talking about Pranksville, PA about all they found there was crap pointing to the framed patsies. For more information on how hundreds of videos were tainted see the following video. But I can tell you all they needed was a 3D layout of Nuke York City, a flight path for the CGI and a synchronization flash which was left in a lot of the falsified videos. 07 - The Key https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 12:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM000520E272CEE5F1@aca43578.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #523567 |
Rocky wrote: > > "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message > news:PM000520CF0724CE8B@aca42ed4.ipt.aol.com... >> Rocky wrote: >>> >>> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >>> news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >>>> Bast wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes I have. >>>>>> >>>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>>> >>>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Lets see >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. " >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>>> ....NO PLANE >>>> >>>> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >>>> out where the fourth plane was. >>>> >>>> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? >>> >>> There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was >>> needed to force them to land in Cleveland. >> >> How were they forced to land? There wasn't a scramble ordered. > > Maybe the pilots were handed a note before they even took off that they > would have to change their flght number in mid air and then land at > Cleveland. So now you are stating that the planes were not forced to land? ASSuming that those planes did land in Cleveland, where did the planes which crashed come from? > > >>> They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two >>> flights >>> were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. >>> >>> It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon >>> were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we >>> were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. >>> >>> And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add >>> fake >>> planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are >>> identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test >> >> >> So how do you explain the fact that I watched the second plane crash into >> the Tower on live TV? > > BULLSHIT you never saw a crash. All you saw was identical to a CGI flying > into a building with no crash dynamics whatsoever. The CGIs never slowed > down and never shed any parts either. And the parts they claimed to have > found were planted just like parts were planted at both the Pentagon and > Pranksville, PA. And talking about Pranksville, PA about all they found > there was crap pointing to the framed patsies. What is a CGI? > > For more information on how hundreds of videos were tainted see the > following video. But I can tell you all they needed was a 3D layout of Nuke > York City, a flight path for the CGI and a synchronization flash which was > left in a lot of the falsified videos. > > 07 - The Key > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds Do you know what kinds of cameras were being used? The footage I saw was shot by NBC's camera people. Hint: they were not digital. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web