Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #585780 > unrolled thread

What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence?

Started byJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post2016-06-19 21:02 -0700
Last post2016-06-27 17:10 -0700
Articles 8 on this page of 28 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 21:02 -0700
    What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 00:02 -0700
      Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-20 11:53 -0500
      Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 09:25 -0700
        Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-25 13:05 -0500
    Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? little brother <andronicus451@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 05:40 -0700
      Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-20 10:02 -0500
      Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 09:46 -0700
        Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 06:22 -0700
          Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 20:20 -0700
          Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-06-22 19:06 -0700
            Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-23 10:18 -0500
              Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 20:01 -0700
                Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-06-24 21:09 -0700
                  Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 21:35 -0700
                    Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-06-24 22:26 -0700
                      Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 22:59 -0700
                        Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-06-24 23:24 -0700
                          Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 07:14 -0700
                      Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-25 15:47 +0000
                        Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 09:21 -0700
                          Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-25 16:51 +0000
                  Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-25 00:07 -0500
                  Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 08:02 -0700
                    Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 17:13 -0700
                      Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-26 20:38 -0500
                    Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-27 04:53 +0000
                      says ... but noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 17:10 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#586594

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-25 09:21 -0700
Message-ID<cbf2bd9a-2d02-4f67-a995-e1dcc4db5332@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#586592
On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 9:01:05 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:35:28 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> >> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
> >> > 
> >> > I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
> >> 
> >> Steam tables.
> > 
> > Steam tables do NOT support your position. You know little about steam tables.
> 
> He totaly fails to understand than most common steam tables are abridged
> for specific uses and that a complete steam table goes to 0 C.

The world is full of people that have a childish attachment to simple certainty and they attempt to redefine reality to fit what they wish to believe.

The boiling point of H2O at sea level pressures is 100 degrees C.  It is not zero degrees. Childish fantasies have no place in a scientific discussion.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#586611

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-06-25 16:51 +0000
Message-ID<kdp24d-voe.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#586594
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 9:01:05 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:35:28 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> >> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> >> > 
>> >> > > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
>> >> > 
>> >> > I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
>> >> 
>> >> Steam tables.
>> > 
>> > Steam tables do NOT support your position. You know little about steam tables.
>> 
>> He totaly fails to understand than most common steam tables are abridged
>> for specific uses and that a complete steam table goes to 0 C.
> 
> The world is full of people that have a childish attachment to simple
> certainty and they attempt to redefine reality to fit what they wish
> to believe.
> 
> The boiling point of H2O at sea level pressures is 100 degrees C.  It is
> not zero degrees. Childish fantasies have no place in a scientific discussion.
 
QED. 
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#586528

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-06-25 00:07 -0500
Message-ID<nkl3ic$146u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#586516
On 6/24/2016 11:09 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>
>> It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally
>> unable to say how or why.
>
> I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't
> provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky
> theory.
>

James is "projecting", I fix;

  "It must be frustrating to me to be so sure I am right and so totally
  unable to say how or why."

it is where James makes a statement about himself, but assignes it to 
others. typically to protect his ego when he is wrong or makes mistakes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#586581

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-25 08:02 -0700
Message-ID<eb48de50-552e-4849-a8ae-bd58c0b8c376@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#586516
On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> 
> > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
> 
> I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.

The only evidence we have are the steam tables.  All other evidence is anecdote, conjecture, opinion, speculation and even blatant spiritualism.  What we have here is a crisis of logic.  Science has been taken over by simpletons whose only goal is to create simple models to fulfill their childish hunger for certainty. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#586844

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-26 17:13 -0700
Message-ID<daad1c07-f964-4e4d-8e7c-afee2c6f6089@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#586581
steam tables were presumably used for special considereations
of generating power from boiling water, so that

> The only evidence we have are the steam tables.  All other evidence is anecdote, conjecture, opinion, speculation and even blatant spiritualism.  What we have here is a crisis of logic.  Science has been taken over by simpletons whose only goal is to create simple models to fulfill their childish hunger for certainty.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#586855

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-06-26 20:38 -0500
Message-ID<nkq021$eur$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#586844
On 6/26/2016 7:13 PM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> steam tables were presumably used for special considereations of
> generating power from boiling water, so that
>
>> The only evidence we have are the steam tables.



Steam tables keep the food warm in hospitals, schools and cafiterias, 
you can buy them on eBay.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Cafeteria-Buffet-Food-Serving-Line-Steam-Cold-Table-W-S-S-Tables-/262467323087?hash=item3d1c4584cf:g:ShoAAOSwqBJXUf2G

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#586887

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-06-27 04:53 +0000
Message-ID<d2o64d-5er.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#586581
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> 
>> > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
>> 
>> I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't
>> provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
> 
> The only evidence we have are the steam tables.

Complete steam tables go down to 0 C.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#587030 — says ... but

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-27 17:10 -0700
Subjectsays ... but
Message-ID<ccdfb4d5-e574-4e90-aa0f-f45a24ebe543@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#586887
and, if they are really completed,
to the triple point, and
to the point where you cannpt tell between liquid & areal steam, but
it might be related to plasma (see Alfven waves,
fast & slow & medium ... press M, firstly

> Complete steam tables go down to 0 C.
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web