Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #559827 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-06 13:36 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-06 21:58 -0800 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
People have blind spots Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 13:36 -0800
Re: People have blind spots jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-06 22:41 +0000
Re: People have blind spots Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 17:14 -0600
Re: People have blind spots Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 06:43 +0100
Re: People have blind spots Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 21:58 -0800
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 13:36 -0800 |
| Subject | People have blind spots |
| Message-ID | <6737b0e8-e04e-420d-a869-b0c841de87ee@googlegroups.com> |
http://scottishsceptic.co.uk/2016/03/05/why-better-theories-fail-and-why-academia-needs-to-change/#comment-39248 Mark Stoval: What would make them see that CO2 don't do what they think it does? James McGinn: I don't think you understand the nature of the problem, Mark. You are suggesting that they (the luke warmers in this instance) have 1) thought about CO2 and 2) that they have a well-defined conceptual model of it and 3) that they are cognitive of this well-defined conceptual model. The reality is that all three of these are wrong. The reality is, 1) they haven't thought about CO2 2) They do not have a well-defined conceptual model, and 3) they are not cognitive of the fact that they do not have a well-defined conceptual model. This is a problem with the atmospheric sciences in general. And it is inclusive of many different issues in the atmospheric science, CO2 forcing, Thermodynamics, convection model of storm theory. And, depending on the issue, no faction is immune to these shortcomings. Surely you have noticed, for example, some of the absurd conversations that have taken place between Joe Postma and people that have tried to explain to him that colder objects don't have the ability to sense they are the colder objects and turn off their outflow of EME. People have blind spots. And they tend to collectivize with others that share their blind spots. I would suggest to all to be less concerned about the blind spots of other and more about their own. The mother of all blind spots involves H2O, not CO2: Current models of water maintain over 60 anomalies. That is 60 as in a six with a zero behind it. That is 5 to 10 times more anomalies than any other substance. https://zenodo.org/record/37224 or https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ James McGinn Solving tornadoes
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 22:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kaouqc-te1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559827 |
Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: And some people are just delusional kooks. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 17:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <qIWdnWBTDLQmJEHLnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #559827 |
On 3/6/16 3:36 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > This is a problem with the atmospheric sciences in general. Translation: James McGinn has a problem with the atmospheric sciences in general because of his lack of education in meteorology. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 06:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nbj47u$m05$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #559842 |
Dne 07/03/2016 v 00:14 Sam Wormley napsal(a): > On 3/6/16 3:36 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >> This is a problem with the atmospheric sciences in general. > > > Translation: James McGinn has a problem with the atmospheric sciences > in general because of his lack of education in meteorology. > and in more fundamental domains like physical chemistry, thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 21:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4f4879a7-8c0f-478b-b499-58b02f15b11d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559911 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 9:43:23 PM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote: > Dne 07/03/2016 v 00:14 Sam Wormley napsal(a): > > On 3/6/16 3:36 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > >> This is a problem with the atmospheric sciences in general. > > > > > > Translation: James McGinn has a problem with the atmospheric sciences > > in general because of his lack of education in meteorology. > > > > and in more fundamental domains like > physical chemistry, thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. You simpletons just list categories and think that is an argument.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web