Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #516082 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-23 09:23 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-24 04:05 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 149 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:23 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:29 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:38 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:55 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:23 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:51 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 22:09 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:15 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:09 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:08 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:33 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 14:42 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:51 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:05 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:13 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:54 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:08 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 15:39 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-23 03:56 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 13:39 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-24 18:37 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 17:24 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-24 22:46 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-25 15:28 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 14:12 -0500
Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-25 21:45 +0000
Re: Rocky's delusions "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-25 22:28 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-26 06:09 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 16:57 -0500
noun (Latin noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 18:02 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-26 10:54 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:22 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:39 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:22 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:54 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:14 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:39 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:17 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 21:30 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:08 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 18:00 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:05 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:16 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:04 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 23:42 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:12 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:21 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:06 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 13:28 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:45 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:54 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:41 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:05 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:53 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 15:51 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:33 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 07:47 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:34 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 09:55 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:36 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 11:00 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:43 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:52 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 14:14 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:00 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:12 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 21:24 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:52 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:15 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:19 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:52 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 04:12 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:04 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:11 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:25 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:05 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 12:45 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:04 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-28 11:30 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:39 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-28 23:16 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:29 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:29 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-27 09:48 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:19 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:34 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:26 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:40 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:47 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:01 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:08 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:27 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-27 10:00 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:13 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:12 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 16:26 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:22 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:42 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:54 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:04 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 15:13 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:05 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 23:52 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:51 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:11 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:55 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 19:02 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:58 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 23:53 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 22:06 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-29 08:49 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 22:29 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:42 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 05:43 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:10 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:27 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:49 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:34 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:05 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:08 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:05 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:12 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:23 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:35 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:03 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 19:09 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:36 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 07:02 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:17 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:37 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:07 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:06 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:19 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:57 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:16 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:35 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:57 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 21:32 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:05 -0500
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 13:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516147 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> BTW it has already been proven that the media changed the audio from >> broadcast to broadcast so what you are hearing in the "collapse" videos >> could be a bogus soundtrack because I believe vaporized buildings make >> very >> little noise and they certainly don't crash to the ground as proven by >> the >> low seismic readings of the great 9/11 hoax. > > The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a nuclear > explosion, kook. And your evidence of how much noise a nuke buried very deep in rock is what? <G> Strange that you don't have any. <G> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching EMP when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> The fact remains NIST lied to us big time as proven by the following playlist so why wouldn't other government agencies add to the lies of NIST? The playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 19:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jlipac-q15.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516199 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > And your evidence of how much noise a nuke buried very deep in rock is what? > <G> Strange that you don't have any. <G> It is a well known fact by educated people that a 1 kiloton nuclear explosion produces a seismic signature of about 4 on the Richter scale, kook. It is a trivial search to verify this from many different sources, kook. The effects of nuclear explosions, both under and above ground, had been studied to death long before the World Trade Center was even built, kook. It is a trivial search to verify this from many different sources, kook. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances that rational people would expect from such events. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 13:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-D983D4.13395323082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516199 |
In article <YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com>, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > And your evidence of how much noise a nuke buried very deep in rock is what? > <G> Strange that you don't have any. <G> > > I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching EMP > when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> Rock is the third best conductor of seismic waves (second is mantle rock, first solid core nickel-iron). That means it left unmistakeable records all around the world. And all of those seismograms, even in North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Russia, and China were disappeared by the CIA. Or the Illuminati. Or the IJC. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 16:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <JeudndJdN9xsqkfInZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516260 |
"je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message news:charlie-gordon1492-D983D4.13395323082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... > In article <YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> And your evidence of how much noise a nuke buried very deep in rock is >> what? >> <G> Strange that you don't have any. <G> >> >> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching >> EMP >> when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> > > Rock is the third best conductor of seismic waves (second is mantle rock, > first > solid core nickel-iron). That means it left unmistakeable records all > around the > world. And all of those seismograms, even in North Korea, Iran, Iraq, > Russia, > and China were disappeared by the CIA. Or the Illuminati. Or the IJC. Don't look at me because I've proven the ground shook 12 seconds before the North Tower turned into ultra fine dust with an EMP at the exact same time the ground shook and yet the seismic readings do not show 12 seconds of nothing? <G> And I've also shown a mushroom cloud from one of the Towers so 3 out of 4 is good enough for me especially when you consider the seismic readings didn't even record the North Tower shaking violently. And it is 4 out of 5 is you consider the fact nothing else explains the "Surviving Corners" of the Twin Towers besides an NCD. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg And the fact that we nuked ourselves on 9/11 could mean we can be easily blackmailed too. But why would someone want to blackmail a country that nukes themselves? DUH Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 21:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mkqpac-pt5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516286 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Don't look at me because I've proven the ground shook 12 seconds before the > North Tower turned into ultra fine dust with an EMP at the exact same time > the ground shook and yet the seismic readings do not show 12 seconds of > nothing? <G> Of course the ground shakes near a collapsing building, you retarded kook. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 15:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-1E6C1D.15080323082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516286 |
In article <JeudndJdN9xsqkfInZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com>, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Don't look at me because I've proven the ground shook 12 seconds before the > North Tower turned into ultra fine dust with an EMP at the exact same time > the ground shook and yet the seismic readings do not show 12 seconds of > nothing? <G> What do the seimograms in Moscow show? > And I've also shown a mushroom cloud from one of the Towers so 3 out of 4 is > good enough for me especially when you consider the seismic readings didn't > even record the North Tower shaking violently. http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/forest-fire-produces-mushroom-cloud-of-hi gh-res-stock-photography/77026669 Spot the nuclear explosion. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 18:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4u6dnQO4NbC-zUfInZ2dnUU7-eGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516305 |
"je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message news:charlie-gordon1492-1E6C1D.15080323082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... > In article <JeudndJdN9xsqkfInZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com>, > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> And I've also shown a mushroom cloud from one of the Towers so 3 out of 4 >> is >> good enough for me especially when you consider the seismic readings >> didn't >> even record the North Tower shaking violently. > > http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/forest-fire-produces-mushroom-cloud-of-high-res-stock-photography/77026669 Too bad that looks more like a fire that is burning out than super heated air going up. Now, back to what you are trying to hard to address and it is the large amount of lies from NIST that we as taxpayers paid millions for. The playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 00:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5n3qac-mo6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516318 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > The playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: The sane people in the world already know that it wasn't the planes hitting the towers that brought them down, it was the post impact fire, kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 23:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrdgjv$c5n$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516286 |
On 23/08/2015 22:17, Rocky wrote: > "je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message > news:charlie-gordon1492-D983D4.13395323082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... >> In article <YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> And your evidence of how much noise a nuke buried very deep in rock is >>> what? >>> <G> Strange that you don't have any. <G> >>> >>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching >>> EMP >>> when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> >> >> Rock is the third best conductor of seismic waves (second is mantle rock, >> first >> solid core nickel-iron). That means it left unmistakeable records all >> around the >> world. And all of those seismograms, even in North Korea, Iran, Iraq, >> Russia, >> and China were disappeared by the CIA. Or the Illuminati. Or the IJC. > > Don't look at me because You can't provide the proof > I've proven the ground shook 12 seconds before the > North Tower turned into ultra fine dust with an EMP at the exact same time > the ground shook and yet the seismic readings do not show 12 seconds of > nothing? <G> > Wow, the ground shook, when the towers fell, who would have thought it. > And I've also shown a mushroom cloud No mushroom cloud in any of your evidence. > from one of the Towers so 3 out of 4 is > good enough for me especially when you consider the seismic readings didn't > even record the North Tower shaking violently. > See other post in this thread for the seismic events. > And it is 4 out of 5 is you consider the fact nothing else explains the > "Surviving Corners" of the Twin Towers besides an NCD. See: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > And the fact that we nuked ourselves on 9/11 could mean we can be easily > blackmailed too. But why would someone want to blackmail a country that > nukes themselves? DUH > > Rocky sheeple > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 04:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sfnltahjaph8shhgn5qu00fqkdv4s5r47e@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516286 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:17:13 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"je suis charly" <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote in message
>news:charlie-gordon1492-D983D4.13395323082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu...
>> In article <YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> And your evidence of how much noise a nuke buried very deep in rock is
>>> what?
>>> <G> Strange that you don't have any. <G>
>>>
>>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching
>>> EMP when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G>
>>
>> Rock is the third best conductor of seismic waves (second is mantle rock,
>> first solid core nickel-iron). That means it left unmistakeable records all
>> around the world. And all of those seismograms, even in North Korea, Iran, Iraq,
>> Russia,and China were disappeared by the CIA. Or the Illuminati. Or the IJC.
>
>Don't look at me because I've proven the ground shook 12 seconds before the
>North Tower turned into ultra fine dust with an EMP at the exact same time
You proved there was no EMP.
>the ground shook and yet the seismic readings do not show 12 seconds of
>nothing? <G>
Had there been a nuclear explosion, ever seismograph on earth
would have recorded it.
>
>And I've also shown a mushroom cloud from one of the Towers so 3 out of 4 is
You've done no such thing. In fact, you linked to a video that
PROVES there was NO mushroom cloud.
>good enough for me especially when you consider the seismic readings didn't
>even record the North Tower shaking violently.
>
I await your evidence that the readings read zero.
>And it is 4 out of 5 is you consider the fact nothing else explains the
>"Surviving Corners" of the Twin Towers besides an NCD. See:
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
Once again, that picture PROVES an uncontrolled collapse.
>And the fact that we nuked ourselves on 9/11 could mean we can be easily
>blackmailed too. But why would someone want to blackmail a country that
>nukes themselves? DUH
Since no nukes were used, a truth you have proved several times,
your question is moot.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8fnltalp3plf6u90otop7rtacvto6ido0d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516260 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:39:53 -0700, je suis charly
<charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote:
>In article <YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> And your evidence of how much noise a nuke buried very deep in rock is what?
>> <G> Strange that you don't have any. <G>
>>
>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching EMP
>> when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G>
>
>Rock is the third best conductor of seismic waves (second is mantle rock, first
>solid core nickel-iron). That means it left unmistakeable records all around the
>world. And all of those seismograms, even in North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Russia,
>and China were disappeared by the CIA. Or the Illuminati. Or the IJC.
And the IRA in their BVDs!
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 23:42 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <0c999aec28e81483a2c0d7daf4d67b78@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516199 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> BTW it has already been proven that the media changed the audio from >>> broadcast to broadcast so what you are hearing in the "collapse" videos >>> could be a bogus soundtrack because I believe vaporized buildings make >>> very >>> little noise and they certainly don't crash to the ground as proven by >>> the >>> low seismic readings of the great 9/11 hoax. >> >> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a nuclear >> explosion, kook. > > A<SMACKAKOOK!> > > I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching EMP > when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit. And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter *inside* one of the WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP would have knocked that camera out, blown out its electronics. Not to mention an EMP would have blown out electrical substations, burned out electrical generation stations, caused helicopters to fall from the sky, burned out every single fucking camera in a radius of dozens of miles. That there is video of the event *as* it happened and immediately *after* it happened proves there were *no* EMPs. At all. Your kooky conspiracy theory is impossible. Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found anywhere in NYC. They found trace amounts of tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforecement weapons sights, they found trace amounts of radon from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at background levels. Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard. Kook. LOL > Th<SMACKAKOOK!> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional blathering bullshit shouted down, stomped into the dirt and raucously laughed at. If you weren't such a delusional retard, you'd realize what a fool you're making of yourself. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 17:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <EfGdnagoKuBF2UfInZ2dnUU7-VWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516300 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:0c999aec28e81483a2c0d7daf4d67b78@dizum.com... >> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching >> EMP >> when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> > > The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were > shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit. And then it decided to stop moving for 12 seconds and restart? What are you doing trying to get a job at CNN with your complete and udder bullshit? > And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter *inside* one of the > WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP would have knocked that > camera out, blown out its electronics. Only if it was from an airborne nuke you clown. What are you doing trying to get a job at CNN with your complete and udder bullshit? > Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were > found anywhere in NYC. Oh and you take the word of a Television Set that could never prove that a commercial jet crashed at the Pentagon or at Pranksville, PA so they had to stoop to using Crisis Actors just like they used in Nuke York City to get people to believe the CGIs were real jets even with a disappearing wing. <G> 9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg And to get this thread back to the subject where are your comments on the following? BTW the playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 01:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <2bd0741b32196531a66b0e2ba2e35fbb@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516306 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:EfGdnagoKuBF2UfInZ2dnUU7-VWdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:0c999aec28e81483a2c0d7daf4d67b78@dizum.com... >>> I<SMACKAKOOK!> No nukes were detonated at the WTC towers. You're just delusional. Take your meds. Kook. LOL >> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were >> shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit. > A<SMACKAKOOK!> The video (below) from *inside* the tower *as* *it* *was* *collapsing* proves you're lying. Or delusional. Your choice. Kook. LOL >> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter *inside* one of the >> WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP would have knocked that >> camera out, blown out its electronics. > O<SMACKAKOOK!> Solid rock not being a conductor, it wouldn't act as a Faraday cage for any nuclear weapon EMP, thus the EMP would be transmitted. And given that the WTC towers sat on solid bedrock, you're lying. Or delusional. Your choice. Kook. LOL >> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were >> found anywhere in NYC. > O<SMACKAKOOK!> I take the word of the professionals who know what the fuck they're talking about. Given that I have radiological decontamination training and experience myself, I know what they say to be true, whereas I know what you say to be a simple matter of you being a liar. Or delusional. Your choice. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 00:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qp3qac-mo6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516306 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > And then it decided to stop moving for 12 seconds and restart? What are you > doing trying to get a job at CNN with your complete and udder bullshit? What would be unusual about that, you raving lunatic? The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 13:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #516300 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Rocky, in <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> BTW it has already been proven that the media changed the audio from >>>> broadcast to broadcast so what you are hearing in the "collapse" >>>> videos >>>> could be a bogus soundtrack because I believe vaporized buildings make >>>> very >>>> little noise and they certainly don't crash to the ground as proven by >>>> the >>>> low seismic readings of the great 9/11 hoax. >>> >>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a nuclear >>> explosion, kook. >> >> A<SMACKAKOOK!> >> >> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching >> EMP >> when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> > > The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were > shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit. > > And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter *inside* one of the > WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP would have knocked that > camera out, blown out its electronics. Not to mention an EMP would > have blown out electrical substations, burned out electrical > generation stations, caused helicopters to fall from the sky, burned > out every single fucking camera in a radius of dozens of miles. That > there is video of the event *as* it happened and immediately *after* > it happened proves there were *no* EMPs. At all. Your kooky conspiracy > theory is impossible. > > Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were > found anywhere in NYC. They found trace amounts of tritium from the > aircraft exit signs and law enforecement weapons sights, they found > trace amounts of radon from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear > weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at background levels. > > Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard. > > Kook. LOL > >> Th<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional blathering bullshit > shouted down, stomped into the dirt and raucously laughed at. If you > weren't such a delusional retard, you'd realize what a fool you're > making of yourself. > > Kook. LOL > >> Rocky > > Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory > violates the laws of physics: > > ====================================================== > 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of > collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below > the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to > today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that > depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's > *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al > Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human > history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep > Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. > > 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an > EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a > nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of > the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused > the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would > have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the > immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized > your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for > dozens of miles radius. > > 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's > no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been > from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of > radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the > tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights > that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a > nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how > delusional you are. > > 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or > anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). > They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement > weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear > weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. > > 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be > sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people > in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, > from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 > MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were > buried. > > 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron > source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay > byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it > decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon > poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger > being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any > sort of nuclear chain reaction. > > 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* > *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical > support column and *NO* EMP: > ====================== > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> > You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column > buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount > of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. > ====================== > > 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to > survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be > approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature > would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? > > 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a > hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding > rock. > > 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic > taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of > satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were > detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects > were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. > > 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent > down to service those nukes (because now that you know the > neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a > periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire > facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the > technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with > "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area > the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to > admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 > years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 > to 1840 degree heat? > > 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) > that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all > 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the > Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your > kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" > (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? > > 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic > signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC > site on 11 Sep 2001? > > 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris > kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep > underground, Ko0K? > > 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have > tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles > deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC > complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to > detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up > your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which > you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference > was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion > started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The > Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). > > 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes > (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your > previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 > nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming > under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in > agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? > While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps > (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was > primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any > contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in > place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this > *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed > "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where > your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly > head again. LOL > > 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your > "34 or more nukes" blather... eventually, your broken brain will be > telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by > 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes > which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground > MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet > and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC > and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the > fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn > out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every > piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's > *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL > > Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back > on your meds, you delusional loon. > ====================================================== > > There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of > physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by > point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp > simple physics. > > Kook. LOL > i know you're fighting with another K0ok like yourself, but last i checked, there is no written-on-paper guarantee that EMP knocks out any random electronic device. i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially those designed recently which happen to luckily have active circuit protection. ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that global warming is 97% of the world's climatologists trying to kontrol the world, or anything. :) -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 12:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g_KdnTfDc9dLykbInZ2dnUU7-SGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516528 |
""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost... > > i know you're fighting with another K0ok like yourself, but last i > checked, there is no written-on-paper guarantee that EMP knocks out any > random electronic device. > > i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially those designed > recently which happen to luckily have active circuit protection. > > ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that global warming > is 97% of the world's climatologists trying to kontrol the world, or > anything. Nuff about nukes and CGIs what I think is funny now is that none of the Television Set Lovers want to look at evidence that proves NIST didn't have one fact to support their "hypothetical collapse initiation" of the Twin Towers. And Kevin Ryan, one of the people in the following videos was even in on some of the test NIST ran so he knows better that NIST was full of BS. The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 17:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ta2sac-o3c.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516537 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Nuff about nukes and CGIs what I think is funny now is that none of the > Television Set Lovers want to look at evidence that proves NIST didn't have > one fact to support their "hypothetical collapse initiation" of the Twin > Towers. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 05:41 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <bbc4f85e483f68e2e9f87f6a617d92fa@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516528 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky, in <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> BT<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a nuclear >>>> explosion, kook. >>> A<SMACKAKOOK!> >>> >>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching >>> EMP when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> >> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were >> shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit. >> >> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter with a camera >> *inside* one of the WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP >> would have knocked that camera out, blown out its electronics. Not >> to mention an EMP would have blown out electrical substations, burned >> out electrical generation stations, caused helicopters to fall from >> the sky, burned out every single fucking camera in a radius of dozens >> of miles. That there is video of the event *as* it happened and >> immediately *after* it happened proves there were *no* EMPs. At all. >> Your kooky conspiracy theory is impossible. >> >> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were >> found anywhere in NYC. They found trace amounts of tritium from the >> aircraft exit signs and law enforecement weapons sights, they found >> trace amounts of radon from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear >> weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at background levels. >> >> Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard. >> >> Kook. LOL >>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!> >> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional blathering bullshit >> shouted down, stomped into the dirt and raucously laughed at. If you >> weren't such a delusional retard, you'd realize what a fool you're >> making of yourself. >> >> Kook. LOL >>> Rocky >> Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory >> violates the laws of physics: >> >> ====================================================== >> 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of >> collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below >> the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to >> today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that >> depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's >> *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al >> Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human >> history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep >> Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. >> >> 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an >> EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a >> nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of >> the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused >> the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would >> have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the >> immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized >> your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for >> dozens of miles radius. >> >> 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's >> no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been >> from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of >> radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the >> tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights >> that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a >> nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how >> delusional you are. >> >> 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or >> anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). >> They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement >> weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear >> weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. >> >> 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be >> sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people >> in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, >> from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 >> MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were >> buried. >> >> 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron >> source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay >> byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it >> decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon >> poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger >> being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any >> sort of nuclear chain reaction. >> >> 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* >> *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical >> support column and *NO* EMP: >> ====================== >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> >> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column >> buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount >> of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. >> ====================== >> >> 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to >> survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be >> approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature >> would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? >> >> 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a >> hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding >> rock. >> >> 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic >> taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of >> satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were >> detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects >> were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. >> >> 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent >> down to service those nukes (because now that you know the >> neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a >> periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire >> facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the >> technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with >> "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area >> the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to >> admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 >> years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 >> to 1840 degree heat? >> >> 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) >> that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all >> 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the >> Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your >> kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" >> (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? >> >> 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic >> signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC >> site on 11 Sep 2001? >> >> 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris >> kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep >> underground, Ko0K? >> >> 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have >> tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles >> deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC >> complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to >> detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up >> your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which >> you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference >> was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion >> started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The >> Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). >> >> 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes >> (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your >> previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 >> nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming >> under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in >> agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? >> While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps >> (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was >> primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any >> contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in >> place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this >> *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed >> "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where >> your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly >> head again. LOL >> >> 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your >> "34 or more nukes" blather... eventually, your broken brain will be >> telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by >> 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes >> which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground >> MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet >> and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC >> and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the >> fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn >> out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every >> piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's >> *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL >> >> Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back >> on your meds, you delusional loon. >> ====================================================== >> >> There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of >> physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by >> point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp >> simple physics. >> >> Kook. LOL > i know you're fighting with another K0ok like myself, but last i > checked, there is no written-on-paper guarantee that EMP knocks out any > random electronic device. There are no written-on-paper guarantees anywhere as regards nukes, you dumbass. Are you another of those kooks who thinks he can wrap electronic equipment in aluminum foil and it'll survive? A nuclear EMP is fucking *harsh*, it melts integrated electronics internally, it's ultra-wide-band (DC to daylight), and it's fucking difficult to shield against. You might want to look up what EMP did to Hawaii in 1962's 1.44 mT Starfish Prime explosion. And that nuclear explosion was a long distance (250 miles up, about 880 miles lateral distance to the southwest, launched from Johnston Atoll... so 914 miles as the crow flies) away from Hawaii. And that was with 1962 electronic devices... no tiny transistors, they were still using tube-type equipment back in those days, which is naturally much more resistant to EMP. Yeah, nuke EMPs are fucking *brutal*. Or the 1.7 kT Hardtack-Yucca HEMP and the damage it caused... the EMP was off the scale. Or did you not know the magnitude of the EMP is not dependent upon the size of the nuke, but upon how fast the nuke can detonate all its nuclear material... so smaller nukes have a worse EMP because they can detonate all their nuclear material instantaneously. They tested transistorized radios in the 70's and how well they would survive an EMP... only a few survived, those with the oldest and thus largest transistors. As transistors continue to get smaller and smaller, there is no way any modern consumer-grade electronic devices would withstand the internal arcing that an EMP would produce. Kook. LOL > i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially those designed > recently which happen to luckily have active circuit protection. "Active circuit protection" won't help when the fucking IC chips themselves have literally been melted internally. You'll be getting right on producing a list of consumer-grade electronic devices that have even basic lightning strike shielding, let alone EMP shielding. Kook. LOL > ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that global warming > is 97% of the world's climatologists trying to kontrol the world, or > anything. NukeKook. LOL Climate Change Denier. LOL -- Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that in your mid-30's, you still live at home with mommy. Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 11:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.x3xivkjctm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #516703 |
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:41:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of > 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as > root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Rocky, in <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did >>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>> BT<SMACKAKOOK!> > >>>>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a nuclear >>>>> explosion, kook. > >>>> A<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>> >>>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching >>>> EMP when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> > >>> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were >>> shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit. >>> >>> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter with a camera >>> *inside* one of the WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP >>> would have knocked that camera out, blown out its electronics. Not >>> to mention an EMP would have blown out electrical substations, burned >>> out electrical generation stations, caused helicopters to fall from >>> the sky, burned out every single fucking camera in a radius of dozens >>> of miles. That there is video of the event *as* it happened and >>> immediately *after* it happened proves there were *no* EMPs. At all. >>> Your kooky conspiracy theory is impossible. >>> >>> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were >>> found anywhere in NYC. They found trace amounts of tritium from the >>> aircraft exit signs and law enforecement weapons sights, they found >>> trace amounts of radon from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear >>> weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at background levels. >>> >>> Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard. >>> >>> Kook. LOL > >>>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!> > >>> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional blathering bullshit >>> shouted down, stomped into the dirt and raucously laughed at. If you >>> weren't such a delusional retard, you'd realize what a fool you're >>> making of yourself. >>> >>> Kook. LOL > >>>> Rocky > >>> Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory >>> violates the laws of physics: >>> >>> ====================================================== >>> 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of >>> collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below >>> the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to >>> today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that >>> depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's >>> *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al >>> Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human >>> history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep >>> Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. >>> >>> 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an >>> EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a >>> nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of >>> the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused >>> the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would >>> have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the >>> immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized >>> your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for >>> dozens of miles radius. >>> >>> 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's >>> no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been >>> from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of >>> radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the >>> tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights >>> that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a >>> nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how >>> delusional you are. >>> >>> 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or >>> anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). >>> They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement >>> weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear >>> weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. >>> >>> 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be >>> sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people >>> in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, >>> from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 >>> MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were >>> buried. >>> >>> 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron >>> source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay >>> byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it >>> decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon >>> poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger >>> being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any >>> sort of nuclear chain reaction. >>> >>> 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* >>> *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical >>> support column and *NO* EMP: >>> ====================== >>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> >>> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column >>> buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount >>> of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. >>> ====================== >>> >>> 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to >>> survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be >>> approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature >>> would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? >>> >>> 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a >>> hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding >>> rock. >>> >>> 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic >>> taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of >>> satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were >>> detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects >>> were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. >>> >>> 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent >>> down to service those nukes (because now that you know the >>> neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a >>> periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire >>> facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the >>> technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with >>> "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area >>> the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to >>> admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 >>> years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 >>> to 1840 degree heat? >>> >>> 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) >>> that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all >>> 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the >>> Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your >>> kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" >>> (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? >>> >>> 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic >>> signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC >>> site on 11 Sep 2001? >>> >>> 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris >>> kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep >>> underground, Ko0K? >>> >>> 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have >>> tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles >>> deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC >>> complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to >>> detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up >>> your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which >>> you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference >>> was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion >>> started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The >>> Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). >>> >>> 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes >>> (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your >>> previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 >>> nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming >>> under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in >>> agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? >>> While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps >>> (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was >>> primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any >>> contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in >>> place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this >>> *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed >>> "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where >>> your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly >>> head again. LOL >>> >>> 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your >>> "34 or more nukes" blather... eventually, your broken brain will be >>> telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by >>> 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes >>> which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground >>> MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet >>> and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC >>> and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the >>> fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn >>> out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every >>> piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's >>> *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL >>> >>> Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back >>> on your meds, you delusional loon. >>> ====================================================== >>> >>> There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of >>> physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by >>> point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp >>> simple physics. >>> >>> Kook. LOL > >> i know you're fighting with another K0ok like myself, but last i >> checked, there is no written-on-paper guarantee that EMP knocks out any >> random electronic device. > > There are no written-on-paper guarantees anywhere as regards nukes, > you dumbass. Are you another of those kooks who thinks he can wrap > electronic equipment in aluminum foil and it'll survive? A nuclear EMP > is fucking *harsh*, it melts integrated electronics internally, it's > ultra-wide-band (DC to daylight), and it's fucking difficult to shield > against. > > You might want to look up what EMP did to Hawaii in 1962's 1.44 mT > Starfish Prime explosion. And that nuclear explosion was a long > distance (250 miles up, about 880 miles lateral distance to the > southwest, launched from Johnston Atoll... so 914 miles as the crow > flies) away from Hawaii. yeah, but have you ever started a sentence with the word "And"? > And that was with 1962 electronic devices... > no tiny transistors, they were still using tube-type equipment back in > those days, which is naturally much more resistant to EMP. > > Yeah, nuke EMPs are fucking *brutal*. and your evidence for this EMP is where? > > Or the 1.7 kT Hardtack-Yucca HEMP and the damage it caused... the EMP > was off the scale. Or did you not know the magnitude of the EMP is not > dependent upon the size of the nuke, but upon how fast the nuke can > detonate all its nuclear material... so smaller nukes have a worse EMP > because they can detonate all their nuclear material instantaneously. are these things you learned in the merchant marines? > > They tested transistorized radios in the 70's and how well they would > survive an EMP... only a few survived, those with the oldest and thus > largest transistors. As transistors continue to get smaller and > smaller, there is no way any modern consumer-grade electronic devices > would withstand the internal arcing that an EMP would produce. a lot of good those will do you when the power grid is out, foamyk0ok. > > Kook. LOL > >> i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially those designed >> recently which happen to luckily have active circuit protection. > > "Active circuit protection" won't help when the fucking IC chips > themselves have literally been melted internally. You'll be getting > right on producing a list of consumer-grade electronic devices that > have even basic lightning strike shielding, let alone EMP shielding. > > Kook. LOL > >> ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that global >> warming >> is 97% of the world's climatologists trying to kontrol the world, or >> anything. > > NukeKook. LOL > > Climate Change Denier. LOL > i believe you've got that backwards. you are the one who suspects that 97% of all climate scientists have started a secret pact to lie to the world since you are a k0okyKonservative. -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web