Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #726594 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-10 06:33 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-02-10 17:07 -0600 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 66 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-10 06:33 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-09 23:49 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-10 14:26 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-10 20:02 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-10 17:07 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 15:09 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-10 14:23 -0600
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-10 19:45 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 12:53 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-10 23:35 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 16:50 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 00:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 17:17 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 17:38 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-11 01:22 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 18:25 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 03:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 05:59 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 20:11 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 06:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-11 21:25 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 21:51 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-12 01:49 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 18:56 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-11 20:23 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 03:36 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-12 06:46 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 06:08 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-12 21:32 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-12 14:59 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 22:37 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 15:48 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 23:13 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:26 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:08 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 22:00 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:06 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 06:03 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 21:08 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:18 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:11 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-15 07:26 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:02 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 07:02 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-16 06:09 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 22:00 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-16 08:18 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-15 05:41 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-12 17:13 -0600
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:25 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:07 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 23:07 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-12 09:14 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 17:17 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:27 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-12 19:49 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 06:09 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 01:11 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 18:22 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 06:08 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:31 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 17:14 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 00:48 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 18:19 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 03:04 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 17:07 -0600
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 22:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36cd59a12fe4a941996491@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #726980 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q4058j$1lv5$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ¤ ¤ On 2/12/2019 7:27 PM, Nadegda wrote: ¤ > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ¤ > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:17:13 -0500, benj wrote: ¤ >> Kensi is science denier and liar. All "she" does it repost journo ¤ >> nonscience lies and blather. Skeptics understand science and have no use ¤ >> for your fantasy. ¤ > ¤ > Pure projection from the "benj" climate-denier. You ought to be working ¤ > for AMC ... as a light bulb. ¤ > ¤ > <snicker> ¤ ¤ Oh, but benj had better be someone well able to handle stress -- I hear ¤ that job has a very high rate of burn-out. Did you steal that line from Gweggles? -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 17:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ca6c401602356f1323@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #726673 |
In article <i3p6jf-g4m.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > >In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >> says... >>> >>>In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >>>> have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how >>>> human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >>>> plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >>>> >>>> The short answer is, ?No?: >>>> >>>> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >>>> >>> >>>We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James Hansen >>>that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. >>> >>>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >> >> What's a jimp? > >Something far beyond the understanding of an adolescent skeeter. I dont know what that means but once again you can't answer the question.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 00:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6bt6jf-8hm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726676 |
In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <i3p6jf-g4m.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > says... >> >>In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>> says... >>>> >>>>In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >>>>> have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how >>>>> human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >>>>> plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >>>>> >>>>> The short answer is, ?No?: >>>>> >>>>> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >>>>> >>>> >>>>We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James Hansen >>>>that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. >>>> >>>>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>> >>> What's a jimp? >> >>Something far beyond the understanding of an adolescent skeeter. > > I dont know what that means but once again you can't answer the > question. As you have been told several times now, a Unix login ID, you adolescent halfwit. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 18:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ca7ba427afa5b41328@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #726683 |
In article <6bt6jf-8hm.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > >In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> In article <i3p6jf-g4m.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >> says... >>> >>>In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>>In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >>>>>> have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how >>>>>> human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >>>>>> plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >>>>>> >>>>>> The short answer is, ?No?: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James Hansen >>>>>that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. >>>>> >>>>>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>> >>>> What's a jimp? >>> >>>Something far beyond the understanding of an adolescent skeeter. >> >> I dont know what that means but once again you can't answer the >> question. > >As you have been told several times now, a Unix login ID, you adolescent >halfwit. This isnt unix so it wont work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 03:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ja57jf-79n.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726684 |
In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <6bt6jf-8hm.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > says... >> >>In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> In article <i3p6jf-g4m.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>> says... >>>> >>>>In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >>>>>>> have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how >>>>>>> human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >>>>>>> plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The short answer is, ?No?: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James Hansen >>>>>>that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. >>>>>> >>>>>>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>> >>>>> What's a jimp? >>>> >>>>Something far beyond the understanding of an adolescent skeeter. >>> >>> I dont know what that means but once again you can't answer the >>> question. >> >>As you have been told several times now, a Unix login ID, you adolescent >>halfwit. > > This isnt unix so it wont work. Much like your attempts to post something clever. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 17:07 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vjb16etmmctlntpmjbd1its1f46pq2afgh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #726594 |
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 06:33:19 +0200, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >snip >The short answer is, I'm a nutter: > Do you put on socks one at a time?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web