Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #527723 > unrolled thread

Upgrading the quantum computer

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Upgrading the quantum computer Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 16:06 -0500
    Re: Upgrading the quantum computer jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-23 22:42 +0000
      Re: Upgrading the quantum computer Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 08:22 -0500
        Re: Upgrading the quantum computer jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-24 19:00 +0000
          Re: Upgrading the quantum computer Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 18:55 -0500
            Re: Upgrading the quantum computer Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 08:32 -0500
              Re: Upgrading the quantum computer jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 16:54 +0000
    Re: Upgrading the quantum computer gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 09:49 -0500
      Re: Upgrading the quantum computer James Sinclair Jr <jamis@portalbnova.org> - 2015-10-24 14:56 +0000

#527723 — Upgrading the quantum computer

Upgrading the quantum computer
> http://phys.org/news/2015-10-quantum.html

> Theoretical physicists have proposed a scalable quantum computer
> architecture. The new model, developed by Wolfgang Lechner, Philipp
> Hauke and Peter Zoller, overcomes fundamental limitations of
> programmability in current approaches that aim at solving real-world
> general optimization problems by exploiting quantum mechanics.
>
> Within the last several years, considerable progress has been made in
> developing a quantum computer, which holds the promise of solving
> problems a lot more efficiently than a classical computer. Physicists
> are now able to realize the basic building blocks, the quantum bits
> (qubits) in a laboratory, control them and use them for simple
> computations. For practical application, a particular class of
> quantum computers, the so-called adiabatic quantum computer, has
> recently generated a lot of interest among researchers and industry.
> It is designed to solve real-world optimization problems conventional
> computers are not able to tackle. All current approaches for
> adiabatic quantum computation face the same challenge: The problem is
> encoded in the interaction between qubits; to encode a generic
> problem, an all-to-all connectivity is necessary, but the locality of
> the physical quantum bits limits the available interactions.
>

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#527740

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Upgrading the quantum computer

You can't upgrade something that doesn't exist, shit head.

Have you ever wondered what your life might have been like if you had
the competence to do more than just copy the words of others, spamming
piece of shit?

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527854

On 10/23/15 5:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
> You can't upgrade something that doesn't exist, shit head.
>

   Try not to be so stooopid, jimp.

   Upgrading the quantum computer
 > http://phys.org/news/2015-10-quantum.html

 > Theoretical physicists have proposed a scalable quantum computer
 > architecture. The new model, developed by Wolfgang Lechner, Philipp
 > Hauke and Peter Zoller, overcomes fundamental limitations of
 > programmability in current approaches that aim at solving real-world
 > general optimization problems by exploiting quantum mechanics.
 >
 > Within the last several years, considerable progress has been made in
 > developing a quantum computer, which holds the promise of solving
 > problems a lot more efficiently than a classical computer. Physicists
 > are now able to realize the basic building blocks, the quantum bits
 > (qubits) in a laboratory, control them and use them for simple
 > computations. For practical application, a particular class of
 > quantum computers, the so-called adiabatic quantum computer, has
 > recently generated a lot of interest among researchers and industry.
 > It is designed to solve real-world optimization problems conventional
 > computers are not able to tackle. All current approaches for
 > adiabatic quantum computation face the same challenge: The problem is
 > encoded in the interaction between qubits; to encode a generic
 > problem, an all-to-all connectivity is necessary, but the locality of
 > the physical quantum bits limits the available interactions.
 >



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527934

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:

Oh boy, another repaste of a snipped cut and paste.

Have you ever wondered what your life might have been like if you had
the competence to do more than just copy the words of others, spamming
piece of shit?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529002

   Upgrading the quantum computer
 > http://phys.org/news/2015-10-quantum.html

 > Theoretical physicists have proposed a scalable quantum computer
 > architecture. The new model, developed by Wolfgang Lechner, Philipp
 > Hauke and Peter Zoller, overcomes fundamental limitations of
 > programmability in current approaches that aim at solving real-world
 > general optimization problems by exploiting quantum mechanics.
 >
 > Within the last several years, considerable progress has been made in
 > developing a quantum computer, which holds the promise of solving
 > problems a lot more efficiently than a classical computer. Physicists
 > are now able to realize the basic building blocks, the quantum bits
 > (qubits) in a laboratory, control them and use them for simple
 > computations. For practical application, a particular class of
 > quantum computers, the so-called adiabatic quantum computer, has
 > recently generated a lot of interest among researchers and industry.
 > It is designed to solve real-world optimization problems conventional
 > computers are not able to tackle. All current approaches for
 > adiabatic quantum computation face the same challenge: The problem is
 > encoded in the interaction between qubits; to encode a generic
 > problem, an all-to-all connectivity is necessary, but the locality of
 > the physical quantum bits limits the available interactions.
 >

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529122

On 10/30/15 12:12 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Where is your discussion you claim to embrace, spamming shit head?



   The poor jump is having trouble finding people to discuss stuff with
   him. Maybe it's his breath, or his bullying or inappropriate language.
   He huffs and puffs, with no progress.

   Name callers like jimp, can greatly benefit from these anger
   management classes.
 > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes

   Upgrading the quantum computer
 > http://phys.org/news/2015-10-quantum.html

 > Theoretical physicists have proposed a scalable quantum computer
 > architecture. The new model, developed by Wolfgang Lechner, Philipp
 > Hauke and Peter Zoller, overcomes fundamental limitations of
 > programmability in current approaches that aim at solving real-world
 > general optimization problems by exploiting quantum mechanics.
 >
 > Within the last several years, considerable progress has been made in
 > developing a quantum computer, which holds the promise of solving
 > problems a lot more efficiently than a classical computer. Physicists
 > are now able to realize the basic building blocks, the quantum bits
 > (qubits) in a laboratory, control them and use them for simple
 > computations. For practical application, a particular class of
 > quantum computers, the so-called adiabatic quantum computer, has
 > recently generated a lot of interest among researchers and industry.
 > It is designed to solve real-world optimization problems conventional
 > computers are not able to tackle. All current approaches for
 > adiabatic quantum computation face the same challenge: The problem is
 > encoded in the interaction between qubits; to encode a generic
 > problem, an all-to-all connectivity is necessary, but the locality of
 > the physical quantum bits limits the available interactions.
 >

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529150

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/30/15 12:12 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Where is your discussion you claim to embrace, spamming shit head?
> 
> 
> 
>   The poor jump is having trouble finding people to discuss stuff with
>   him. Maybe it's his breath, or his bullying or inappropriate language.
>   He huffs and puffs, with no progress.

It seems your bull shit posts aren't worth discussing, shit head.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527885

On 10/23/2015 4:06 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Upgrading the quantum computer


>>  All current approaches for
>> adiabatic quantum computation face the same challenge: The problem is
>> encoded in the interaction between qubits; to encode a generic
>> problem, an all-to-all connectivity is necessary, but the locality of
>> the physical quantum bits limits the available interactions.

Problems;

1. there is no quantum computer.

2. encoding interacting qubits

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527889

gilber34 wrote:

>>>  All current approaches for
>>> adiabatic quantum computation face the same challenge: The problem is
>>> encoded in the interaction between qubits; to encode a generic
>>> problem, an all-to-all connectivity is necessary, but the locality of
>>> the physical quantum bits limits the available interactions.

Overpaid qm and computer illiterate. Profit oriented as well.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web