Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #515431 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-28 12:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 137 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:09 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-21 15:23 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:09 +1000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:01 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:15 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:23 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 16:47 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:48 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 17:38 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:49 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 17:51 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:29 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:28 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:16 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 09:11 +0100
2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:51 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:26 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:38 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:40 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 17:45 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 11:59 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:45 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:10 +0000
Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:29 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:33 +0000
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:14 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:39 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 15:00 +0100
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:00 +0000
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:58 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:50 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:07 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:11 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 21:17 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 22:58 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:43 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:16 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:05 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 01:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:35 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:37 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:41 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 06:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 07:40 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:34 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 14:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:52 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:53 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 08:42 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:53 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:34 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 18:02 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 21:36 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 10:03 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:17 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:07 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-23 09:07 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 06:08 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:22 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:31 -0700
Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 10:43 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:01 +0000
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 19:38 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:08 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:35 +0000
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:05 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 13:06 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 21:47 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:38 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:19 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:43 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:49 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-23 04:44 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 09:56 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 10:46 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:14 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:02 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:02 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-27 19:21 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:39 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:05 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:10 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 18:17 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:31 +0200
Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-28 13:54 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:42 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:09 +0000
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:12 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:17 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0700
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:16 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 17:17 +0200
box cutters were not illegal, at that time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:27 -0700
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 18:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pagpac-7s4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516172 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Besides you just haven't looked around because the number of people who > don't believe the official bullshit about 9/11 keeps going up. <G> What happened has long been settled for the sane people, kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc6kta5oqokmtrfi1mvkcu6rtrjmvc9rhp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516172 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:16:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:hddhta195sqvfjb8i5st6ho9upij468bd0@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> Eventually you will realize that no matter how many times you repeat
>>>> yourself, it really won't make it true.
>>>> Although you may indeed convince yourself that it is.
>>>>
>>>> Now watch this video,....while there is still a glimmer of hope for you
>>>> to have an open mind.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKtU01qcZBM
>>>
>>>Nice video but the fact WTC7 also took Fiterman Hall with it, which was
>>>the
>>>building north of WTC7 proves WTC7 was another building destroyed by an
>>>underground nuke and not debris from the Twin Towers.
>>
>> It proves the exact opposite of your claim.
>
>You always say shit with nothing at all to support it. BTW that is SOP for
>the Television Set Huggers as yourself.
>
So I pulled a Rocky. That's what it's called when someone makes a
claim and doesn't provide anything that supports said claim.
>BTW NIST uses the same SOP as you as proven by the videos titled
>"Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence." <G>
>
Sure they did.
Quit pulling a Rocky.
>>>It is what people do not say that leads everybody down the wrong
>>>direction.
>>
>> No educated person claims nukes were involved with 9/11.
>
>You mean nobody educated by Prime Time News like yourself you clown.
Once again you're reduced to pulling a Rocky.
>
>Besides you just haven't looked around because the number of people who
>don't believe the official bullshit about 9/11 keeps going up. <G>
>
And again you pull a Rocky.
How is that ignoring my posts thing working out for you?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 11:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <zeadnZ6G9PrHAkXInZ2dnUU7-c2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515680 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:rnmkac-7ci.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> If he wants to run from the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax let 'em. > > The facts are some airliners were hijacked. > > Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires > which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed > almost 2 hours later. > > One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the > western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. > > Everything else is kook babble. > > That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. > > That there is missing rubble is kook babble. > > That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. > > That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. > > That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear > devices is kook babble. > > That there was an EMP is kook babble. > > That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not > seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. > > That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything > to do with what happened is kook babble. > > That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. > > That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima > or Nagasaki is kook babble. > > That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear > is kook babble. > > That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance > and still be expected to work is kook babble. > > That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear > bombs is kook babble. > > That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the > airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. > > That all the video was CGI is kook babble. > > That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. > > That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the > windows is kook babble. > > That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. > > That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion > is kook babble. > > There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to > ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. > > Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. > > When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature > that can be detected anywhere on the planet. > > There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the > collapse of the two towers was detected. > > This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. > > Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is > kook babble. > > Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. > > > -- > Jim Pennino Oh boy, Jim Mimeograph is having another meltdown. Just face the facts. Your beloved Television lied to you. The Towers didn't collapse they were nuked and there were only CGIs in Nuke York City. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 18:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mra9re$tcs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #515785 |
On 22/08/2015 17:13, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:rnmkac-7ci.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> If he wants to run from the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax let 'em. >> >> The facts are some airliners were hijacked. >> >> Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires >> which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed >> almost 2 hours later. >> >> One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the >> western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. >> >> Everything else is kook babble. >> >> That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. >> >> That there is missing rubble is kook babble. >> >> That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. >> >> That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. >> >> That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear >> devices is kook babble. >> >> That there was an EMP is kook babble. >> >> That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not >> seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. >> >> That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything >> to do with what happened is kook babble. >> >> That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. >> >> That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima >> or Nagasaki is kook babble. >> >> That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear >> is kook babble. >> >> That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance >> and still be expected to work is kook babble. >> >> That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear >> bombs is kook babble. >> >> That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the >> airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. >> >> That all the video was CGI is kook babble. >> >> That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. >> >> That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the >> windows is kook babble. >> >> That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. >> >> That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion >> is kook babble. >> >> There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to >> ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. >> >> Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. >> >> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature >> that can be detected anywhere on the planet. >> >> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the >> collapse of the two towers was detected. >> >> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. >> >> Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is >> kook babble. >> >> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. >> >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > Oh boy, Jim Mimeograph is having another meltdown. > > Just face the facts. Your beloved Television lied to you. The Towers > didn't collapse they were nuked and there were only CGIs in Nuke York City. > > Rocky > > You still have not answered the question about what sort of radiation was present after 911, are you to scared to answer? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8n5418.poc.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #515655 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8n4rf2.4mi.17.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >>> news:MPG.3040d81cc98c6a3398ac46@news.altopia.com... >>>> In article <8n3vtn.5mn.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>> says... >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>>>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > >>>>>>> You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as >>>>>>> the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able >>>>>>> to explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several >>>>>>> laws >>>>>>> of physics. >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean your laws of Physics and not Newton's laws. I've seen >>>>>> your math and how you get miles deep when it should be meters >>>>>> deep is beyond me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Plus you can try your hardest to keep your lies about the >>>>>> Ted/Barbara bullshit but the fact remains most all those calls >>>>>> were scripted as proven by the similarity between flights, the >>>>>> terms that would not be used in real life and the fact the >>>>>> scripts had a stewardess making calls when that would be the >>>>>> last thing >>>>>> she would have done because of her training. >>>>>> >>>>>> In other words you might want to check out what Rebekah Roth >>>>>> stated about the obvious scripting of all the calls made on >>>>>> 9/11.01. See: "Airline whistleblower solves 9/11" >>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ >>>>>> >>>>>> So, I'll say it again in case you missed it. When you look at >>>>>> all the phone calls together the similarities between flights >>>>>> prove something was screwy and then the phrases people used also >>>>>> proved things where funny and then when they had a Stewardess >>>>>> making calls that wasn't even real because they are trained not >>>>>> to bring attention to themselves during a hijacking. So >>>>>> basically the >>>>>> calls made from the four alleged flights were scripted or phony >>>>>> phone calls. Plus if someone really sprayed pepper spray on a >>>>>> flight it would >>>>>> have stunk up everywhere on that flight and not just part of it >>>>>> so that wasn't true to life either. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> there never was any planes >>>> >>>> There isn't even a Rocky on my server. >>> >>> And do you really think anybody cares? >> >> you admit you don't care about you > > If he wants to run from the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax let 'em. > > Rocky what's 9/11
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 21:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30419c2189a1003a98ac68@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #515691 |
In article <8n5418.poc.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > Rocky wrote: > > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:8n4rf2.4mi.17.1@news.alt.net... > >> Rocky wrote: > >>> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > >>> news:MPG.3040d81cc98c6a3398ac46@news.altopia.com... > >>>> In article <8n3vtn.5mn.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > >>>> says... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Rocky wrote: > >>>>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" > >>>>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > > >>>>>>> You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as > >>>>>>> the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able > >>>>>>> to explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several > >>>>>>> laws > >>>>>>> of physics. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You mean your laws of Physics and not Newton's laws. I've seen > >>>>>> your math and how you get miles deep when it should be meters > >>>>>> deep is beyond me. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Plus you can try your hardest to keep your lies about the > >>>>>> Ted/Barbara bullshit but the fact remains most all those calls > >>>>>> were scripted as proven by the similarity between flights, the > >>>>>> terms that would not be used in real life and the fact the > >>>>>> scripts had a stewardess making calls when that would be the > >>>>>> last thing > >>>>>> she would have done because of her training. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In other words you might want to check out what Rebekah Roth > >>>>>> stated about the obvious scripting of all the calls made on > >>>>>> 9/11.01. See: "Airline whistleblower solves 9/11" > >>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So, I'll say it again in case you missed it. When you look at > >>>>>> all the phone calls together the similarities between flights > >>>>>> prove something was screwy and then the phrases people used also > >>>>>> proved things where funny and then when they had a Stewardess > >>>>>> making calls that wasn't even real because they are trained not > >>>>>> to bring attention to themselves during a hijacking. So > >>>>>> basically the > >>>>>> calls made from the four alleged flights were scripted or phony > >>>>>> phone calls. Plus if someone really sprayed pepper spray on a > >>>>>> flight it would > >>>>>> have stunk up everywhere on that flight and not just part of it > >>>>>> so that wasn't true to life either. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Rocky > >>>>> > >>>>> there never was any planes > >>>> > >>>> There isn't even a Rocky on my server. > >>> > >>> And do you really think anybody cares? > >> > >> you admit you don't care about you > > > > If he wants to run from the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax let 'em. > > > > Rocky > > what's 9/11 0.81818181818181818181818181... -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sdigta5ccufhc4sso00hcqfhd37p755dr3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515713 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 21:36:21 -0700, Checkmate
<Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
[...]
>> > If he wants to run from the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax let 'em.
>> >
>> > Rocky
>>
>> what's 9/11
>
>0.81818181818181818181818181...
And that's Checkmate for the win!
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6digtaludsb3mq9gjk45i639r350kr2f0n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515655 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:52:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[...]
>>>>>> So, I'll say it again in case you missed it. When you look at all
>>>>>> the phone calls together the similarities between flights prove
>>>>>> something was screwy and then the phrases people used also proved
>>>>>> things where funny and then when they had a Stewardess making calls
>>>>>> that wasn't even real because they are trained not to bring
>>>>>> attention to themselves during a hijacking. So basically the
>>>>>> calls made from the four alleged flights were scripted or phony
>>>>>> phone calls. Plus if someone really sprayed pepper spray on a flight
>>>>>> it would
>>>>>> have stunk up everywhere on that flight and not just part of it so
>>>>>> that wasn't true to life either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>
>>>>> there never was any planes
>>>>
>>>> There isn't even a Rocky on my server.
>>>
>>> And do you really think anybody cares?
>>
>> you admit you don't care about you
>
>If he wants to run from the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax let 'em.
Your lie about nukes, while certainly a hoax, is not the Great
9/11 Hoax. Please cease claiming it is.
Are you aware that 'em is short for them? You've basically
stated, "If he wants... let them."
This is just more evidence, if any were needed, that you are not
faking the learning disability you present you have.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mcigtad6plssc5ksq83g312hgj4duhk39n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515648 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:34:32 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[...]
>>> > So, I'll say it again in case you missed it. When you look at all
>>> > the phone calls together the similarities between flights prove
>>> > something was screwy and then the phrases people used also proved
>>> > things where funny and then when they had a Stewardess making calls
>>> > that wasn't even real because they are trained not to bring attention
>>> > to themselves during a hijacking. So basically the calls made from
>>> > the four alleged flights were scripted or phony phone calls.
>>> >
>>> > Plus if someone really sprayed pepper spray on a flight it would have
>>> > stunk up everywhere on that flight and not just part of it so that
>>> > wasn't true to life either.
>>> >
>>> > Rocky
>>>
>>> there never was any planes
>>
>> There isn't even a Rocky on my server.
>
>And do you really think anybody cares?
That you took the time to reply is proof that you care. You may
not care much, but you do care.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 10:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <55d72f97$0$52963$b1db1813$79461190@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #515538 |
In article <FcKdnfh25LWst0rInZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@giganews.com>, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > In other words you might want to check out what Rebekah Roth stated about > the obvious scripting of all the calls made on 9/11.01. See: > "Airline whistleblower solves 9/11" > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ Yah. I blame everything on the "tribe that dominates American media." Thomas Pynchon indeed. -- Where's the Vangelis music? Pris' tongue is sticking out in in the wide shot after Batty has kissed her. They have put back more tits into the Zhora dressing room scene. -- notes for Blade Runner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 20:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ea2df866207596259d82bbc3e6a68ffa@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515538 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:FcKdnfh25LWst0rInZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message > >> You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as >> the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able to >> explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several laws >> of physics. > Yo<SMACKAKOOK!> Stupid sans-science fuckwits will have to learn to sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up while those are more intelligent patiently explain to them that they are simply too stupid to understand simple concepts, despite having it explained to them multiple times, Stupid Fuckwit. Seismic waves travel in the Earth at anywhere from 5 to 13 kilometers per second depending upon the composition of the soil. Educate yourself, you retard: <http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/seismology/keeping_track.php> "Body waves are composed of two principal types; the P (primary) wave, comparable to sound waves, which compresses and dilates the rock as it travels forward through the Earth; and the S (secondary) wave, which shakes the rock sideways as it advances at barely more than half the P-wave speed. The P wave is designated the primary preliminary wave because it is the first to arrive at a seismic station after an earthquake. It travels at a speed usually less than 6 kilometers per second in the Earth's crust and jumps to 13 kilometers per second through the core." So you're saying these supposed nukes were buried from 60 to 156 kilometers (37.28 to 96.93 *miles*) below the surface of the WTC towers? Back in 1968, when groundbreaking started on the WTC towers, and before we had the technology to drill much deeper than 13,000 feet (~2.5 miles). LOL Kook. LOL > P<SMACKAKOOK!> Delusional psychotic fuckwits who blather stupidity will have their stupid slobbering gobs smacked shut each time they spew their stupidity, Delusional Psychotic Fuckwit. <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/American_Airlines_Flight_77_Calls> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you retarded fuckwit. They said, and I quote: "57. The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which of four 'connected calls to unknown numbers' represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband’s office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May’s parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such calls). The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 9:20:15 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI report,“American Airlines Airphone Usage,” Sept. 20, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. 14, 2001; AAL response to the Commission’s supplemental document request, Jan. 20, 2004. Footnote 57 to Chapter 1, 9/11 Commission Report" Notice the text blurb "the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband’s office", you fucking delusional little monkey. The FBI said exactly the *opposite* of what you're claiming. But of course, you've never actually *read* the FBI report, have you? You retard. The FBI said they weren't sure which call belonged to whom because the call was an operator-assisted collect call and thus didn't have proper tracking from the AirPhone system, given that AirPhones were serviced by AT&T Wireless' Aviation Division (ClairCom), and AT&T doesn't bill itself. Verizon serviced airplane phones for TWA (now a part of American), United, Continental, US Airways and most Delta flights, but AT&T had American flights. The phone records of Ted Olson's office prove you're not only wrong, you're not only delusional, but you're retarded, as well. The witnesses, including the AT&T operators (plural, there was more than one phone call from the plane's AirPhone from Barbara Olson to Ted Olson), Ted Olson's secretary and Ted Olson himself, prove you're a retard who believes other retards just as or more retarded than you are. Barbara Olson desperately asked Ted Olson what she should tell the pilot to do, not because she could call the pilot on his phone, but because the pilot was standing in the back of the plane with the passengers. The fucking plane had been hijacked, the terrorists were flying the plane. You idiot. But your broken brain seems to think that everything must be a conspiracy. Occam's Razor makes no sense to you... because you're retarded. Kook. LOL > I<SMACKAKOOK!> Delusional idiotic mouth-breathing slope-browed naval-lint-picking unemployable uneducated retarded spewtards will find they are given no voice for their delusional blather, until they are able to cogently, rationally and with scientific proof explain how their kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate several laws of physics. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 15 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There's now 15 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 20:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <c6udnT7Ex8OFtETInZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515592 |
Hey Friendly Neighborhood Nut are you melting down again? And if all you had to go by was the following photo and knowing the buildings started out at 110 floors what do you see in the following? http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:ea2df866207596259d82bbc3e6a68ffa@dizum.com... > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Rocky, in <news:FcKdnfh25LWst0rInZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@giganews.com> > did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >> wrote in message > > >>> You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as >>> the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able to >>> explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several laws >>> of physics. > >> Yo<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Stupid sans-science fuckwits will have to learn to sit the fuck > down and shut the fuck up while those are more intelligent > patiently explain to them that they are simply too stupid to > understand simple concepts, despite having it explained to them > multiple times, Stupid Fuckwit. > > Seismic waves travel in the Earth at anywhere from 5 to 13 > kilometers per second depending upon the composition of the soil. > > Educate yourself, you retard: > <http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/seismology/keeping_track.php> > "Body waves are composed of two principal types; the P (primary) > wave, comparable to sound waves, which compresses and dilates the > rock as it travels forward through the Earth; and the S > (secondary) wave, which shakes the rock sideways as it advances > at barely more than half the P-wave speed. The P wave is > designated the primary preliminary wave because it is the first > to arrive at a seismic station after an earthquake. It travels at > a speed usually less than 6 kilometers per second in the Earth's > crust and jumps to 13 kilometers per second through the core." > > So you're saying these supposed nukes were buried from 60 to 156 > kilometers (37.28 to 96.93 *miles*) below the surface of the WTC > towers? Back in 1968, when groundbreaking started on the WTC > towers, and before we had the technology to drill much deeper > than 13,000 feet (~2.5 miles). LOL > > Kook. LOL > >> P<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Delusional psychotic fuckwits who blather stupidity will have > their stupid slobbering gobs smacked shut each time they spew > their stupidity, Delusional Psychotic Fuckwit. > > <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/American_Airlines_Flight_77_Calls> > > The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you > retarded fuckwit. > > They said, and I quote: "57. The records available for the phone > calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which > of four 'connected calls to unknown numbers' represent the two > between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe > that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and > her husbandā?Ts office (all family members of the Flight 77 > passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received > any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee Mayā?Ts > parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such > calls). The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; > 9:20:15 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 > seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI > report,ā?oAmerican Airlines Airphone Usage,ā?¯ Sept. 20, 2001; FBI > report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, > 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. > 14, 2001; AAL response to the Commissionā?Ts supplemental document > request, Jan. 20, 2004. Footnote 57 to Chapter 1, 9/11 Commission > Report" > > Notice the text blurb "the FBI and DOJ believe that all four > represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husbandā?Ts > office", you fucking delusional little monkey. > > The FBI said exactly the *opposite* of what you're claiming. But > of course, you've never actually *read* the FBI report, have you? > You retard. > > The FBI said they weren't sure which call belonged to whom > because the call was an operator-assisted collect call and thus > didn't have proper tracking from the AirPhone system, given that > AirPhones were serviced by AT&T Wireless' Aviation Division > (ClairCom), and AT&T doesn't bill itself. Verizon serviced > airplane phones for TWA (now a part of American), United, > Continental, US Airways and most Delta flights, but AT&T had > American flights. > > The phone records of Ted Olson's office prove you're not only > wrong, you're not only delusional, but you're retarded, as well. > The witnesses, including the AT&T operators (plural, there was > more than one phone call from the plane's AirPhone from Barbara > Olson to Ted Olson), Ted Olson's secretary and Ted Olson himself, > prove you're a retard who believes other retards just as or more > retarded than you are. > > Barbara Olson desperately asked Ted Olson what she should tell > the pilot to do, not because she could call the pilot on his > phone, but because the pilot was standing in the back of the > plane with the passengers. The fucking plane had been hijacked, > the terrorists were flying the plane. You idiot. > > But your broken brain seems to think that everything must be a > conspiracy. Occam's Razor makes no sense to you... because you're > retarded. > > Kook. LOL > >> I<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Delusional idiotic mouth-breathing slope-browed > naval-lint-picking unemployable uneducated retarded spewtards > will find they are given no voice for their delusional blather, > until they are able to cogently, rationally and with scientific > proof explain how their kooky conspiracy theory is able to > violate several laws of physics. > > Kook. LOL > >> Rocky > > Now, get to addressing the 15 ways your kook conspiracy theory > violates the laws of physics: > > ====================================================== > 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of > collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep > below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to > drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact > that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal > *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 > miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole > *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why > the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. > > 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an > EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd > been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond > time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) > would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount > of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That > there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no > nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have > destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. > > 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that > there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. > If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have > shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most > likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement > weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type > of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or > educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. > > 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex > or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit > signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial > sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for > all other sources of radiation. > > 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be > sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by > people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you > k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the > order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame > the bombs were buried. > > 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron > source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, > the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, > include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon > poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger > being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start > any sort of nuclear chain reaction. > > 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* > *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling > vertical support column and *NO* EMP: > ====================== > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> > You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column > buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No > amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. > ====================== > > 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going > to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would > be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the > temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? > > 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through > a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into > surrounding rock. > > 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic > taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of > satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were > detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill > effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or > aircraft. > > 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to > service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source > triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic > basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at > 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology > to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 > blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area > the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced > to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched > for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to > survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? > > 12) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) > that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers > (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked > off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your > admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of > the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" > (your words)? > > 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic > signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the > WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? > > 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris > kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep > underground, Ko0K? > > 15) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their > underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly > under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid > bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers > (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations > and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion > started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on > The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). > ====================================================== > > There's now 15 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws > of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, > point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who > can't grasp simple physics. > > Kook. LOL > > -- > > Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid > admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and > more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly > demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of > illogic. > > For instance: > ============================= > A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video > *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you > they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a > simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the > nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 > years. > > B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video > disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed > to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it > was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your > supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 > *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and > thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're > talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that > scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill > that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to > yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least > try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a > shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, > now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked > away for 33 years". > > C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require > periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which > naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay > byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon > poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to > service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means > your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow > hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an > impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", > to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, > complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the > explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were > maintained" (your words). > > D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of > your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of > satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in > which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink > interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, > they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there > were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely > ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the > city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact > that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or > its vicinity. > > E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were > buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, > which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to > demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so > your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could > somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just > below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their > cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain > said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* > in *12* *seconds*. LOL > > F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs > your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up > to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they > didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd > be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), > that leads right back to your calculation of the time between > your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the > buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've > proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that > you're insane. LOL > > IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from > reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in > little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing > your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into > a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even > started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. > ============================= > > Kook. LOL >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 19:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8n7v5c.313.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #515938 |
. but you're the only one that believes you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 09:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1m9lny4.9dzd8d1giytkrN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #515940 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > . > > but you're the only one that believes you Hush now, he's trolling Fakey. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 06:08 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <199e57e20c3c16d1c368ad8ba5e54f3b@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515938 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:c6udnT7Ex8OFtETInZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > He<SMACKAKOOK!> Again for the slow-wits, until retards are able to provide proof of their assertions, they will not be allowed to spew their retardation. Until such time, you will shut the fuck up, sit the fuck down, and stop making such a fool of yourself. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL ====================================================== There are now 16 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 21:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8n872l.v59.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #515969 |
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > did you read the part where my balls are going to fall off
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 21:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3042ec86cd9266d798ac88@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #515971 |
In article <8n872l.v59.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > did you read the part where my balls are going to fall off Notice the complete lack of empathy. -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 10:43 -0500 |
| Subject | Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) |
| Message-ID | <io-dnZ6beo0xdETInZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515969 |
Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: Since you have tried to say the outside of the walls of the Twin Towers were just for looks and that is contradictory to facts I have a few videos for you to see: The following is a complete playlist so it might take a while to load: The playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 17:01 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: |
| Message-ID | <isapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516094 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: Breaking news for the raving lunatic: The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 19:38 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: |
| Message-ID | <9a2ebb42801f7b94ff8f8bd1acf7d3d8@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516094 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:io-dnZ6beo0xdETInZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Bre<SMACKAKOOK!> Your utterly impossible kook conspiracy scenario did not happen the way you k'lame. It could not have, because it violates the laws of physics. You are delusional and off your meds, so you cannot discern fantasy from reality. Seek professional psychiatric help immediately. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371 nukes buried 15,682,941 miles below the surface. LOL ====================================================== There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web