Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #726594 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-10 06:33 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-02-10 17:07 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 66 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-10 06:33 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-09 23:49 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-10 14:26 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-10 20:02 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-10 17:07 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 15:09 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-10 14:23 -0600
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-10 19:45 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 12:53 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-10 23:35 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 16:50 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 00:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 17:17 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 17:38 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-11 01:22 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 18:25 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 03:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 05:59 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 20:11 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 06:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-11 21:25 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 21:51 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-12 01:49 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 18:56 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-11 20:23 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 03:36 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-12 06:46 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 06:08 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-12 21:32 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-12 14:59 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 22:37 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 15:48 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 23:13 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:26 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:08 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 22:00 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:06 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 06:03 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 21:08 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:18 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:11 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-15 07:26 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:02 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 07:02 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-16 06:09 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 22:00 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-16 08:18 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-15 05:41 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-12 17:13 -0600
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:25 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:07 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 23:07 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-12 09:14 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 17:17 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:27 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-12 19:49 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 06:09 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 01:11 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 18:22 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 06:08 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:31 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 17:14 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 00:48 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 18:19 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 03:04 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 17:07 -0600
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 14:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c01b2q.d6a.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727289 |
On 2019-02-14 1:18 a.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q42pa6$1ont$5@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > > ¤ > ¤ On 2/13/2019 7:06 PM, Checkmate wrote: > ¤ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > ¤ > Checkmate! In article <q4242k$b4k$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > ¤ > @gmail.invalid says... > ¤ > ¤ On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:08:28 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > ¤ > ¤ > Do you punce? > ¤ > ¤ > ¤ > ¤ Do I what? > ¤ > ¤ > ¤ > ¤ And: In what way is your question relevant? > ¤ > > ¤ > It was a rhetorical question that only you can answer. > ¤ > ¤ Translation: it's nonsense and Checkmate was drunk when he wrote that post. > ¤ > ¤ *snicker* > > Not very likely, since I don't drink, you Ko0ok. > why does he tell everyone to snicker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-15 07:26 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q45ij2$716$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727289 |
On 2/14/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q42pa6$1ont$5@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > ¤ Translation: it's nonsense and Checkmate was drunk when he wrote that post. > ¤ > ¤ *snicker* > > Not very likely, since I don't drink, you Ko0ok. Yeah, right, we believe ya! *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 22:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36cff5dfafe6b3b09964e5@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #727472 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q45ij2$716$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ¤ ¤ On 2/14/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: ¤ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ¤ > Checkmate! In article <q42pa6$1ont$5@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 ¤ > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ¤ > ¤ Translation: it's nonsense and Checkmate was drunk when he wrote that post. ¤ > ¤ ¤ > ¤ *snicker* ¤ > ¤ > Not very likely, since I don't drink, you Ko0ok. ¤ ¤ Yeah, right, we believe ya! ¤ ¤ *snicker* Were you aware TINW? -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-15 07:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q469nt$1m5f$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727472 |
On 2/15/2019 12:26 AM, kensi wrote: > On 2/14/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <q42pa6$1ont$5@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> ¤ Translation: it's nonsense and Checkmate was drunk when he wrote >> that post. >> ¤ >> ¤ *snicker* >> >> Not very likely, since I don't drink, you Ko0ok. > > Yeah, right, we believe ya! > > *snicker* > Obviously no science in this discussion. Wait. No INTELLIGENCE in this discussion. Move along.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-16 06:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q482e0$1ep4$8@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727492 |
On 2/15/2019 7:02 AM, benj wrote: > Obviously no science in this discussion. Wait. No INTELLIGENCE in this > discussion. Move along. You can't observe something without affecting it. In this case, the combined IQ of everyone here instantly decreased to zero the moment you arrived. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-15 22:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c04qtq.lcr.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727575 |
On 2019-02-15 9:09 p.m., kensi wrote: > On 2/15/2019 7:02 AM, benj wrote: >> Obviously no science in this discussion. Wait. No INTELLIGENCE in this >> discussion. Move along. > > You can't observe something without affecting it. In this case, the > combined IQ of everyone here instantly decreased to zero the moment you > arrived. > > *snicker* > i don't want to snicker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-16 08:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36d1d7b3cd749c4b155c@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727575 |
In article <q482e0$1ep4$8@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 2/15/2019 7:02 AM, benj wrote: >> Obviously no science in this discussion. Wait. No INTELLIGENCE in this >> discussion. Move along. > >You can't observe something without affecting it. In this case, the >combined IQ of everyone here instantly decreased to zero the moment you >arrived. > >*snicker* Liar, I observed AOC act like a buffoon and watched her again and she still acted like a buffoon. Nothing changed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-15 05:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36d06165b9beb9bb14c4@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727472 |
In article <q45ij2$716$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 2/14/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <q42pa6$1ont$5@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> ? Translation: it's nonsense and Checkmate was drunk when he wrote that post. >> ? >> ? *snicker* >> >> Not very likely, since I don't drink, you Ko0ok. > >Yeah, right, we believe ya! > >*snicker* TINW
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 17:13 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q3vjuj$1epe$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #726943 |
On 2/12/2019 4:37 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >>>>>>> climate change? >>>>>> >>>>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what >>>>>> some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think >>>>>> she's out of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on >>>>>> the basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier >>>>>> in *this very thread*. >>>>> >>>>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. >>>> >>>> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. >>> >>> Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and take >>> your nap. >> >> kensi 2 - 0 jimp >> >> Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out of 5? > > Give up what? Do you puerile twits believe you are in some sort of contest? > > jimp has won. Nads, you and "kensi pupa" have lost. Further denial of this fact only underscores your ignorance, adolescence, and that you both are still immature twits.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 00:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q3vo64$b4k$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #726943 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:37:27 +0000, jimp wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think >>>>>>> about climate change? >>>>>> >>>>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with >>>>>> what some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I >>>>>> don't think she's out of line in classifying you as a climate >>>>>> change denier on the basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one >>>>>> instance was earlier in *this very thread*. >>>>> >>>>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. >>>> >>>> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. >>> >>> Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and take >>> your nap. >> >> kensi 2 - 0 jimp >> >> Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out of 5? > > puerile twits You know what, kensi? Keeping this up wouldn't be very sporting. It's a battle of wits with an unarmed man ... if he even is a man. I'm starting to suspect this "jimp" thingy might actually be a bot, it's gotten so repetitive and predictable ... -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 22:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36cd5405a9579b30996488@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #726957 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q3vo64$b4k$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... ¤ ¤ Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ¤ On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:37:27 +0000, jimp wrote: ¤ ¤ > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: ¤ >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, ¤ >> melt! ¤ >> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: ¤ >> ¤ >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: ¤ >>>> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: ¤ >>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: ¤ >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, ¤ >>>>>> melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: ¤ >>>>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think ¤ >>>>>>> about climate change? ¤ >>>>>> ¤ >>>>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with ¤ >>>>>> what some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I ¤ >>>>>> don't think she's out of line in classifying you as a climate ¤ >>>>>> change denier on the basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one ¤ >>>>>> instance was earlier in *this very thread*. ¤ >>>>> ¤ >>>>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. ¤ >>>> ¤ >>>> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. ¤ >>> ¤ >>> Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and take ¤ >>> your nap. ¤ >> ¤ >> kensi 2 - 0 jimp ¤ >> ¤ >> Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out of 5? ¤ > ¤ > puerile twits ¤ ¤ You know what, kensi? Keeping this up wouldn't be very sporting. If you run away, you're a Spankard. If you invoke your Kensi sock for support, you're a Spankard. You know what that means, doncha? SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 23:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36cc10897e6b6952996467@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #726837 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q3tj2e$1tf0$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ¤ ¤ On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: ¤ > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: ¤ >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ¤ >> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: ¤ >>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about ¤ >>> climate change? ¤ >> ¤ >> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what some ¤ >> would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think she's out ¤ >> of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on the basis of that ¤ >> pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier in *this very thread*. ¤ > ¤ > Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. ¤ ¤ Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. More like a statement of the obvious. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 09:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q3ukc7$np6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #726847 |
On 2/12/2019 2:07 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q3tj2e$1tf0$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >>>>> climate change? >>>> >>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what some >>>> would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think she's out >>>> of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on the basis of that >>>> pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier in *this very thread*. >>> >>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. >> >> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. > > More like a statement of the obvious. Now, everybody's a winner! I hear the ice cream truck!!! -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 17:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q3vgl1$uhs$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #726821 |
On 2/11/2019 8:49 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 06:03:13 +0000, jimp wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 2/10/2019 10:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> About all that comes out of adolescent twits. >>>>> >>>>> An IKYABWAI lame? *That's* the best retort you could think up after >>>>> an hour and a half? You disappoint me, climate change denier. >>>> >>>> Blow it out your ass child. >>> >>> kensi 1 - 0 jimp >>> >>> Try again? :) >> >> Try what, attempt to have an intelligent conversation with an adolescent >> twit that thinks "climate change denier" is some sort of clever put down >> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >> climate change? > > You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what some > would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think she's out > of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on the basis of that > pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier in *this very thread*. > Kensi is science denier and liar. All "she" does it repost journo nonscience lies and blather. Skeptics understand science and have no use for your fantasy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 00:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q3voa7$b4k$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #726937 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:17:13 -0500, benj wrote: > On 2/11/2019 8:49 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 06:03:13 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 2/10/2019 10:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> About all that comes out of adolescent twits. >>>>>> >>>>>> An IKYABWAI lame? *That's* the best retort you could think up after >>>>>> an hour and a half? You disappoint me, climate change denier. >>>>> >>>>> Blow it out your ass child. >>>> >>>> kensi 1 - 0 jimp >>>> >>>> Try again? :) >>> >>> Try what, attempt to have an intelligent conversation with an >>> adolescent twit that thinks "climate change denier" is some sort of >>> clever put down when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what >>> I think about climate change? >> >> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what >> some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think >> she's out of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on the >> basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier in >> *this very thread*. > > Kensi is science denier and liar. All "she" does it repost journo > nonscience lies and blather. Skeptics understand science and have no use > for your fantasy. Pure projection from the "benj" climate-denier. You ought to be working for AMC ... as a light bulb. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 19:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <09q66e9h75phogt77linprcc38la5nshal@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #726959 |
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: <...> >Pure projection from the "benj" climate-denier. You ought to be working >for AMC ... as a light bulb. Would sure be preferable to his working for George Soros like you and kensi do, you shill! -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 06:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q4059c$1lv5$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #726964 |
On 2/12/2019 7:49 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > <...> > >> Pure projection from the "benj" climate-denier. You ought to be working >> for AMC ... as a light bulb. > > Would sure be preferable to his working for George > Soros like you and kensi do, you shill! Proof, k0ok? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 01:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <if7cjf-s1a.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726959 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > <snicker> The most profound thing these puerile half wits have posted to date. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 18:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvsh1d.ajr.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #726965 |
On 2019-02-12 6:11 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> <snicker> > > The most profound thing these puerile half wits have posted to date. > whats a jimp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 06:08 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q4058j$1lv5$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #726959 |
On 2/12/2019 7:27 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:17:13 -0500, benj wrote: >> Kensi is science denier and liar. All "she" does it repost journo >> nonscience lies and blather. Skeptics understand science and have no use >> for your fantasy. > > Pure projection from the "benj" climate-denier. You ought to be working > for AMC ... as a light bulb. > > <snicker> Oh, but benj had better be someone well able to handle stress -- I hear that job has a very high rate of burn-out. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web