Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #632105 > unrolled thread

The rules change

Started byjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
First post2017-05-06 07:18 -0700
Last post2017-05-11 17:31 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 104 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-06 07:18 -0700
    Re: The rules change Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-06 14:21 -0500
    Re: The rules change moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-06 19:51 +0000
    Re: The rules change Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-07 10:09 -0500
    Re: The rules change dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2017-05-09 14:53 -0400
      Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 12:12 -0700
        Re: The rules change pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-05-09 12:33 -0700
          Re: The rules change Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-11 22:40 -0500
            Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 03:04 -0700
              Re: The rules change HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 05:13 -0700
                Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-12 18:32 -0400
                  Re: The rules change Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-13 13:38 -0500
              Re: The rules change Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 06:18 -0700
                Re: The rules change Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 06:46 -0700
                  Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-12 18:53 -0400
                Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 07:22 -0700
                  Re: The rules change Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 09:34 -0500
                  Re: The rules change moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-12 18:16 +0000
                    Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-12 19:05 -0400
                      Re: The rules change HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 02:01 -0700
                        Re: The rules change Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-13 13:08 -0500
                        Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-15 21:01 -0400
                          Re: The rules change Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-17 08:54 -0500
                            Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-17 18:56 -0400
                              Re: The rules change Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 16:27 -0700
                                Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-17 20:15 -0400
                  Re: The rules change Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 19:42 -0700
                Re: The rules change Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-12 13:41 -0500
                  Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-12 19:09 -0400
              Re: The rules change Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 09:33 -0500
                Re: The rules change Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 07:46 -0700
                  Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 07:51 -0700
                    Re: The rules change Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 14:59 -0500
                    Re: The rules change Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 19:46 -0700
                      Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 05:37 -0700
                        Re: The rules change Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 08:27 -0500
                        Re: The rules change moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-13 14:34 +0000
                        Re: The rules change Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 10:52 -0700
                        Re: The rules change HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 11:55 -0700
                          Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-15 19:31 +0000
                            Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-15 21:41 -0400
                              Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-16 03:06 +0000
                                Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-16 18:23 -0400
                                  Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-16 22:38 +0000
                                    Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-16 21:00 -0400
                                      Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-17 02:51 +0000
                                        Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 05:02 -0700
                                          Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-17 18:47 -0400
                                        Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-17 18:46 -0400
                                          Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-17 23:25 +0000
                                            Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-17 20:04 -0400
                                              Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-18 00:29 +0000
                                                Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 19:06 -0700
                              Re: The rules change Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 11:01 -0700
                  Re: The rules change "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-12 09:15 -0700
                    Re: The rules change Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 13:23 -0700
                      Re: The rules change "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-12 14:24 -0700
                Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-12 18:56 -0400
        Re: The rules change Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 15:19 -0500
          Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-09 18:18 -0400
        Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-09 17:57 -0400
          Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 15:19 -0700
            Re: The rules change HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 19:44 -0700
              Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 19:51 -0700
              Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-10 17:37 -0400
                Re: The rules change HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 02:18 -0700
                  Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-11 16:41 +0000
                    Re: The rules change HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 10:07 -0700
                      Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 18:13 -0400
                    Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 18:34 -0400
                      Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-11 23:36 +0000
                        Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 20:43 -0400
                          Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-12 02:27 +0000
                            Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 22:56 -0400
                              Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-12 04:58 +0000
                                Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-12 18:31 -0400
                                  Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-12 22:49 +0000
                                    Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-12 20:33 -0400
                                      Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-13 02:24 +0000
                                        Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-15 20:58 -0400
                                          Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-16 01:10 +0000
                                            Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-15 22:35 -0400
                                              Re: The rules change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-16 05:08 +0000
                                                Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-16 17:49 -0400
            Re: The rules change Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 07:50 -0500
              Re: The rules change HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 07:23 -0700
                Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 07:35 -0700
                  Re: The rules change moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-10 17:31 +0000
                    Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 10:57 -0700
                      Re: The rules change moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-10 19:01 +0000
                      Re: The rules change Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 15:16 -0500
                  Re: The rules change HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 11:28 -0700
                    Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 11:48 -0700
                      Re: The rules change Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-10 13:58 -0500
                Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-10 17:51 -0400
                  Re: The rules change Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-12 20:29 -0500
                    Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-15 20:57 -0400
        Re: The rules change moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-10 00:06 +0000
          Re: The rules change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 19:49 -0700
            Re: The rules change moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-10 05:21 +0000
            Re: The rules change HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 03:51 -0700
              Re: The rules change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-10 17:42 -0400
            Re: The rules change Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 07:51 -0500
              Re: The rules change poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-05-11 17:31 -0700

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →


#633381

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-15 21:41 -0400
Message-ID<591a58dc$0$29124$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#633326
On 5/15/2017 3:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Poor John says
>> Don't matter who said it.
>> It means any vacuum is immediately filled.
>> There are no vacuums that persist.
>> Including Space.
>> ---------------
>>
>> The vacuum between your ears would dispute that. (Had to take the opening)
>
> As would vacuum tubes and light bulbs.

Chimp vacuum tubes are old science and gone. And light bulbs do not have 
a vacuum in them. I presume you are like Bert and HVAC and "know how 
everything works" NOT.

>> John, seriously bro. You're not thinking with any thought.
>>
>> Re think your life
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633398

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2017-05-16 03:06 +0000
Message-ID<ev6qud-uec.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#633381
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 5/15/2017 3:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Poor John says
>>> Don't matter who said it.
>>> It means any vacuum is immediately filled.
>>> There are no vacuums that persist.
>>> Including Space.
>>> ---------------
>>>
>>> The vacuum between your ears would dispute that. (Had to take the opening)
>>
>> As would vacuum tubes and light bulbs.
> 
> Chimp vacuum tubes are old science and gone. And light bulbs do not have 
> a vacuum in them. I presume you are like Bert and HVAC and "know how 
> everything works" NOT.

As usual the troll has nothing either true nor usefull to say.

Vacuum tubes are alive and well in high power and a few other niche
applications and most incandescent bulbs do contain a vacuum troll.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_tube#Vacuum_tubes_in_the_21st_century
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633496

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-16 18:23 -0400
Message-ID<591b7bff$0$58368$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#633398
On 5/15/2017 11:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 5/15/2017 3:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Poor John says
>>>> Don't matter who said it.
>>>> It means any vacuum is immediately filled.
>>>> There are no vacuums that persist.
>>>> Including Space.
>>>> ---------------
>>>>
>>>> The vacuum between your ears would dispute that. (Had to take the opening)
>>>
>>> As would vacuum tubes and light bulbs.
>>
>> Chimp vacuum tubes are old science and gone. And light bulbs do not have
>> a vacuum in them. I presume you are like Bert and HVAC and "know how
>> everything works" NOT.
>
> As usual the troll has nothing either true nor usefull to say.
>
> Vacuum tubes are alive and well in high power and a few other niche
> applications and most incandescent bulbs do contain a vacuum troll.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_tube#Vacuum_tubes_in_the_21st_century
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb

No "most" incandescent bulbs do not contain vacuum. in fact they are 
nearly on the way out as Vacuum tubes. I hate to tell you geezer, but 
turn off your Philco radio and join the modern world. So you found a 
vacuum tube in your son's guitar amp and to you that "Proves" that all 
cellphones still use them. You need to join the world AFTER Roswell.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633500

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2017-05-16 22:38 +0000
Message-ID<ujbsud-7qj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#633496
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 5/15/2017 11:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 5/15/2017 3:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Poor John says
>>>>> Don't matter who said it.
>>>>> It means any vacuum is immediately filled.
>>>>> There are no vacuums that persist.
>>>>> Including Space.
>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>
>>>>> The vacuum between your ears would dispute that. (Had to take the opening)
>>>>
>>>> As would vacuum tubes and light bulbs.
>>>
>>> Chimp vacuum tubes are old science and gone. And light bulbs do not have
>>> a vacuum in them. I presume you are like Bert and HVAC and "know how
>>> everything works" NOT.
>>
>> As usual the troll has nothing either true nor usefull to say.
>>
>> Vacuum tubes are alive and well in high power and a few other niche
>> applications and most incandescent bulbs do contain a vacuum troll.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_tube#Vacuum_tubes_in_the_21st_century
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb
> 
> No "most" incandescent bulbs do not contain vacuum. in fact they are 
> nearly on the way out as Vacuum tubes. I hate to tell you geezer, but 
> turn off your Philco radio and join the modern world. So you found a 
> vacuum tube in your son's guitar amp and to you that "Proves" that all 
> cellphones still use them. You need to join the world AFTER Roswell.

The troll babbles on with nonsense and ad hominems while those that read
the reference realize the troll is also full of shit.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633509

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-16 21:00 -0400
Message-ID<591ba0a6$0$51694$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#633500
On 5/16/2017 6:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 5/15/2017 11:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 5/15/2017 3:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Poor John says
>>>>>> Don't matter who said it.
>>>>>> It means any vacuum is immediately filled.
>>>>>> There are no vacuums that persist.
>>>>>> Including Space.
>>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vacuum between your ears would dispute that. (Had to take the opening)
>>>>>
>>>>> As would vacuum tubes and light bulbs.
>>>>
>>>> Chimp vacuum tubes are old science and gone. And light bulbs do not have
>>>> a vacuum in them. I presume you are like Bert and HVAC and "know how
>>>> everything works" NOT.
>>>
>>> As usual the troll has nothing either true nor usefull to say.
>>>
>>> Vacuum tubes are alive and well in high power and a few other niche
>>> applications and most incandescent bulbs do contain a vacuum troll.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_tube#Vacuum_tubes_in_the_21st_century
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb
>>
>> No "most" incandescent bulbs do not contain vacuum. in fact they are
>> nearly on the way out as Vacuum tubes. I hate to tell you geezer, but
>> turn off your Philco radio and join the modern world. So you found a
>> vacuum tube in your son's guitar amp and to you that "Proves" that all
>> cellphones still use them. You need to join the world AFTER Roswell.
>
> The troll babbles on with nonsense and ad hominems while those that read
> the reference realize the troll is also full of shit.
>
Chimp wanders in daze imagining himself to be a genius because he found 
a statement in wikipedia (the most irrefutable of all "references") that 
he can interpret as agreeing with his ignorance. He has no experience in 
Life, so he assumes nobody else does either.

Note that even YEARS ago when incandescent bulbs were still the thing, a 
physics professor (well known and famous, by the way) I worked for had 
these notes for high school physics teachers. that told how to make a 
home-made X-ray machine using a light bulb. He had to specify a very 
special street lamp bulb because it was one of the few incandescent 
bulbs with a vacuum inside.

Watch the monkey jump on his leash"! Chimp: "Oh! Oh! Oh! You babbling 
troll you said that ONE bulb had a vacuum inside therefore *I* (!!!!!!) 
am right that MOST bulbs have a vacuum!

<sigh> Chimp, Archiepoo, Bert, and HVAC here! Did you EVER see so much 
human insanity and ignorance concentrated in one spot?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633513

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2017-05-17 02:51 +0000
Message-ID<ieqsud-ecl.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#633509
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 5/16/2017 6:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 5/15/2017 11:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/15/2017 3:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Poor John says
>>>>>>> Don't matter who said it.
>>>>>>> It means any vacuum is immediately filled.
>>>>>>> There are no vacuums that persist.
>>>>>>> Including Space.
>>>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vacuum between your ears would dispute that. (Had to take the opening)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As would vacuum tubes and light bulbs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chimp vacuum tubes are old science and gone. And light bulbs do not have
>>>>> a vacuum in them. I presume you are like Bert and HVAC and "know how
>>>>> everything works" NOT.
>>>>
>>>> As usual the troll has nothing either true nor usefull to say.
>>>>
>>>> Vacuum tubes are alive and well in high power and a few other niche
>>>> applications and most incandescent bulbs do contain a vacuum troll.
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_tube#Vacuum_tubes_in_the_21st_century
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb
>>>
>>> No "most" incandescent bulbs do not contain vacuum. in fact they are
>>> nearly on the way out as Vacuum tubes. I hate to tell you geezer, but
>>> turn off your Philco radio and join the modern world. So you found a
>>> vacuum tube in your son's guitar amp and to you that "Proves" that all
>>> cellphones still use them. You need to join the world AFTER Roswell.
>>
>> The troll babbles on with nonsense and ad hominems while those that read
>> the reference realize the troll is also full of shit.
>>
> Chimp wanders in daze imagining himself to be a genius because he found 
> a statement in wikipedia

The troll babbles nonsense and ad hominems for several paragraphs.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633527

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-17 05:02 -0700
Message-ID<23a87d75-b288-46b1-8212-6c74b2a94321@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#633513
Jim
"The troll babbles nonsense and ad hominems for several paragraphs"
Honeymoon is over.
Next stage is FOAD.
Then, whatever happened to Sam happens
to you, benj 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633586

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-17 18:47 -0400
Message-ID<591cd30b$0$51686$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#633527
On 5/17/2017 8:02 AM, john wrote:
> Jim
> "The troll babbles nonsense and ad hominems for several paragraphs"
> Honeymoon is over.
> Next stage is FOAD.
> Then, whatever happened to Sam happens
> to you, benj
>
Oh My! Last I heard Sam died from Global warming. I think it was a 
massive sea rise in Iowa and he drown. RIP Sam!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633585

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-17 18:46 -0400
Message-ID<591cd2bc$0$51686$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#633513
On 5/16/2017 10:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 5/16/2017 6:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 5/15/2017 11:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/15/2017 3:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Poor John says
>>>>>>>> Don't matter who said it.
>>>>>>>> It means any vacuum is immediately filled.
>>>>>>>> There are no vacuums that persist.
>>>>>>>> Including Space.
>>>>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The vacuum between your ears would dispute that. (Had to take the opening)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As would vacuum tubes and light bulbs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chimp vacuum tubes are old science and gone. And light bulbs do not have
>>>>>> a vacuum in them. I presume you are like Bert and HVAC and "know how
>>>>>> everything works" NOT.
>>>>>
>>>>> As usual the troll has nothing either true nor usefull to say.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vacuum tubes are alive and well in high power and a few other niche
>>>>> applications and most incandescent bulbs do contain a vacuum troll.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_tube#Vacuum_tubes_in_the_21st_century
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb
>>>>
>>>> No "most" incandescent bulbs do not contain vacuum. in fact they are
>>>> nearly on the way out as Vacuum tubes. I hate to tell you geezer, but
>>>> turn off your Philco radio and join the modern world. So you found a
>>>> vacuum tube in your son's guitar amp and to you that "Proves" that all
>>>> cellphones still use them. You need to join the world AFTER Roswell.
>>>
>>> The troll babbles on with nonsense and ad hominems while those that read
>>> the reference realize the troll is also full of shit.
>>>
>> Chimp wanders in daze imagining himself to be a genius because he found
>> a statement in wikipedia
>
> The troll babbles nonsense and ad hominems for several paragraphs.
>
more perpetual motion! I think I've just discovered a "free energy" 
machine! I"m not lying!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633602

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2017-05-17 23:25 +0000
Message-ID<in2vud-97t.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#633585
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 5/16/2017 10:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 5/16/2017 6:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/15/2017 11:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/15/2017 3:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Poor John says
>>>>>>>>> Don't matter who said it.
>>>>>>>>> It means any vacuum is immediately filled.
>>>>>>>>> There are no vacuums that persist.
>>>>>>>>> Including Space.
>>>>>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The vacuum between your ears would dispute that. (Had to take the opening)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As would vacuum tubes and light bulbs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chimp vacuum tubes are old science and gone. And light bulbs do not have
>>>>>>> a vacuum in them. I presume you are like Bert and HVAC and "know how
>>>>>>> everything works" NOT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As usual the troll has nothing either true nor usefull to say.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vacuum tubes are alive and well in high power and a few other niche
>>>>>> applications and most incandescent bulbs do contain a vacuum troll.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_tube#Vacuum_tubes_in_the_21st_century
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb
>>>>>
>>>>> No "most" incandescent bulbs do not contain vacuum. in fact they are
>>>>> nearly on the way out as Vacuum tubes. I hate to tell you geezer, but
>>>>> turn off your Philco radio and join the modern world. So you found a
>>>>> vacuum tube in your son's guitar amp and to you that "Proves" that all
>>>>> cellphones still use them. You need to join the world AFTER Roswell.
>>>>
>>>> The troll babbles on with nonsense and ad hominems while those that read
>>>> the reference realize the troll is also full of shit.
>>>>
>>> Chimp wanders in daze imagining himself to be a genius because he found
>>> a statement in wikipedia
>>
>> The troll babbles nonsense and ad hominems for several paragraphs.
>>
> more perpetual motion! I think I've just discovered a "free energy" 
> machine! I"m not lying!

The troll continues to babble.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633607

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-17 20:04 -0400
Message-ID<591ce4f4$0$60174$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#633602
On 5/17/2017 7:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 5/16/2017 10:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 5/16/2017 6:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/15/2017 11:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 5/15/2017 3:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Poor John says
>>>>>>>>>> Don't matter who said it.
>>>>>>>>>> It means any vacuum is immediately filled.
>>>>>>>>>> There are no vacuums that persist.
>>>>>>>>>> Including Space.
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The vacuum between your ears would dispute that. (Had to take the opening)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As would vacuum tubes and light bulbs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chimp vacuum tubes are old science and gone. And light bulbs do not have
>>>>>>>> a vacuum in them. I presume you are like Bert and HVAC and "know how
>>>>>>>> everything works" NOT.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As usual the troll has nothing either true nor usefull to say.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vacuum tubes are alive and well in high power and a few other niche
>>>>>>> applications and most incandescent bulbs do contain a vacuum troll.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_tube#Vacuum_tubes_in_the_21st_century
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No "most" incandescent bulbs do not contain vacuum. in fact they are
>>>>>> nearly on the way out as Vacuum tubes. I hate to tell you geezer, but
>>>>>> turn off your Philco radio and join the modern world. So you found a
>>>>>> vacuum tube in your son's guitar amp and to you that "Proves" that all
>>>>>> cellphones still use them. You need to join the world AFTER Roswell.
>>>>>
>>>>> The troll babbles on with nonsense and ad hominems while those that read
>>>>> the reference realize the troll is also full of shit.
>>>>>
>>>> Chimp wanders in daze imagining himself to be a genius because he found
>>>> a statement in wikipedia
>>>
>>> The troll babbles nonsense and ad hominems for several paragraphs.
>>>
>> more perpetual motion! I think I've just discovered a "free energy"
>> machine! I"m not lying!
>
> The troll continues to babble.

Proven! Limitless free energy right from chimp!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633617

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2017-05-18 00:29 +0000
Message-ID<rf6vud-ug.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#633607
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 5/17/2017 7:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 5/16/2017 10:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/16/2017 6:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/15/2017 11:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 5/15/2017 3:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Poor John says
>>>>>>>>>>> Don't matter who said it.
>>>>>>>>>>> It means any vacuum is immediately filled.
>>>>>>>>>>> There are no vacuums that persist.
>>>>>>>>>>> Including Space.
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The vacuum between your ears would dispute that. (Had to take the opening)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As would vacuum tubes and light bulbs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Chimp vacuum tubes are old science and gone. And light bulbs do not have
>>>>>>>>> a vacuum in them. I presume you are like Bert and HVAC and "know how
>>>>>>>>> everything works" NOT.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As usual the troll has nothing either true nor usefull to say.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vacuum tubes are alive and well in high power and a few other niche
>>>>>>>> applications and most incandescent bulbs do contain a vacuum troll.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_tube#Vacuum_tubes_in_the_21st_century
>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No "most" incandescent bulbs do not contain vacuum. in fact they are
>>>>>>> nearly on the way out as Vacuum tubes. I hate to tell you geezer, but
>>>>>>> turn off your Philco radio and join the modern world. So you found a
>>>>>>> vacuum tube in your son's guitar amp and to you that "Proves" that all
>>>>>>> cellphones still use them. You need to join the world AFTER Roswell.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The troll babbles on with nonsense and ad hominems while those that read
>>>>>> the reference realize the troll is also full of shit.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Chimp wanders in daze imagining himself to be a genius because he found
>>>>> a statement in wikipedia
>>>>
>>>> The troll babbles nonsense and ad hominems for several paragraphs.
>>>>
>>> more perpetual motion! I think I've just discovered a "free energy"
>>> machine! I"m not lying!
>>
>> The troll continues to babble.
> 
> Proven! Limitless free energy right from chimp!

The troll continues in his pathetic attempt to impress someone, anyone,
with his nonsense.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633633

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-17 19:06 -0700
Message-ID<9a6b7dc6-673a-47e5-967e-eb784244ffa0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#633617
Jim
"
The troll continues in his pathetic attempt to impress someone, anyone, 
with his nonsense. 


-"
Do you miss Sam?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633450

FromEdward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-16 11:01 -0700
Message-ID<dca42b2a-65ea-47c7-85c7-d92d58dd66e8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#633381
On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 9:41:50 PM UTC-4, benj wrote:
> On 5/15/2017 3:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Poor John says
> >> Don't matter who said it.
> >> It means any vacuum is immediately filled.
> >> There are no vacuums that persist.
> >> Including Space.
> >> ---------------
> >>
> >> The vacuum between your ears would dispute that. (Had to take the opening)
> >
> > As would vacuum tubes and light bulbs.
> 
> Chimp vacuum tubes are old science and gone. And light bulbs do not have 
> a vacuum in them. I presume you are like Bert and HVAC and "know how 
> everything works" NOT.
> 
X-ray tubes may be old science, but still very much in use.
And any leaks will cause you to have a really bad day.

 ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633056

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2017-05-12 09:15 -0700
Message-ID<of4mtj$4v9$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#633052
Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
Odd Bodkin wrote:
Voltaire invented the Volt
>
Virdy wrote:
Voltaire invented the Volt-AIR! aka Lightening...
>
hanson wrote:
and Aristotle invented the Beer-Bottle.
It rhymes! It's all in the name, n'est pas!
LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633076

FromMahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-12 13:23 -0700
Message-ID<86189865-25ab-4a23-8d9d-23200ae1e5fa@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#633056
On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 12:15:58 PM UTC-4, hanson wrote:
> Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
> Voltaire invented the Volt
> >
> Virdy wrote:
> Voltaire invented the Volt-AIR! aka Lightening...

Hey... Sir hansonJi, I merely implied that. I never actually wrote it/that!
It's not that the word combinations are finite, it's our time to write them.

> hanson wrote:
> and Aristotle invented the Beer-Bottle.
> It rhymes! It's all in the name, n'est pas!
> LOL

It's me m(y) birthday today (5/12), family and friends remind me.
I will raise a glass, and toast to you me m(y) pal hansonJi. All the best.

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633079

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2017-05-12 14:24 -0700
Message-ID<of5949$gpo$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#633076
 Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
> Voltaire invented the Volt
> >
> Virdy wrote:
> Voltaire invented the Volt-AIR! aka Lightening...

Hey... Sir hansonJi, I merely implied that. I never actually wrote it/that!
It's not that the word combinations are finite, it's our time to write them.

> hanson wrote:
> and Aristotle invented the Beer-Bottle.
> It rhymes! It's all in the name, n'est pas!
> LOL
>
Virdy wrote:
It's me m(y) birthday today (5/12), family and friends remind me.
I will raise a glass, and toast to you me m(y) pal hansonJi. All the best.
>
hanson wrote:
Well, well, well, HAPPY Birthday & many a Aristotle-BeerBottle to you,
for you being the venerable horny old Taurus, the Bull. Cheers, Virdy.

.” 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#633087

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-12 18:56 -0400
Message-ID<59163d87$0$53448$c3e8da3$b1356c67@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#633048
On 5/12/2017 10:33 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 5/12/17 5:04 AM, john wrote:
>> I'm not the one who said "nature abhors a vacuum".
>> I believe Voltaire coined that one.
>> You have not heard it because you have not
>> read science enough.
>
> So Voltaire was a scientist? He invented the volt?
>
And not only that Peeaire invented Pee. I smell Nobel!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632623

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-09 15:19 -0500
Message-ID<oet88n$12os$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#632617
On 5/9/17 2:12 PM, john wrote:
> How's this for rules?
> 
> There are no "voids". Nature abhors a void.
> Therefore Space is not empty, just different.
> 
> Everything is built from something. Every part
> is itself made from parts.
> 
> You guys flaunt both of those rules in your
> messed-up "physics". Straighten up and fly
> straight
> 

First of all, you pontificate on rules that you believe, but that's not 
how science works. Science INFERS the rules of nature by watching 
observations.

If you have no rationale for your rules, then they are just fabrications 
of your mind without basis. You've already acknowledged you have no 
explanation for WHY you believe what you do. Since they are fabrications 
of your own mind without basis, there's absolutely no reason for anyone 
else to believe them too.

Secondly, space is not nothing. Space is an entity in itself, with 
physical properties. Nobody in physics says otherwise.

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632687

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-09 18:18 -0400
Message-ID<5912402a$0$57929$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#632623
On 5/9/2017 4:19 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 5/9/17 2:12 PM, john wrote:
>> How's this for rules?
>>
>> There are no "voids". Nature abhors a void.
>> Therefore Space is not empty, just different.
>>
>> Everything is built from something. Every part
>> is itself made from parts.
>>
>> You guys flaunt both of those rules in your
>> messed-up "physics". Straighten up and fly
>> straight
>>
>
> First of all, you pontificate on rules that you believe, but that's not
> how science works. Science INFERS the rules of nature by watching
> observations.
>
> If you have no rationale for your rules, then they are just fabrications
> of your mind without basis. You've already acknowledged you have no
> explanation for WHY you believe what you do. Since they are fabrications
> of your own mind without basis, there's absolutely no reason for anyone
> else to believe them too.
>
> Secondly, space is not nothing. Space is an entity in itself, with
> physical properties. Nobody in physics says otherwise.
>
Wow! Look at this after listening to me Odd has turned around 180 
degrees. I feel like my life finally has some value! My next goal is to 
get him to term that which has those properties "aether".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web