Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #509511 > unrolled thread

Another MEMS Success Story

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Another MEMS Success Story Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 20:21 -0600
    Re: Another MEMS Success Story jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-26 23:17 +0000
      Re: Another MEMS Success Story Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 23:55 -0500
    Re: Another MEMS Success Story Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 18:02 -0700
    Re: Another MEMS Success Story Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 23:48 -0500

#509511 — Another MEMS Success Story

Another MEMS Success Story
> http://gpsworld.com/another-mems-success-story/


> Not only have MEMS sensors improved in performance, but SBG has also
> developed advanced calibration capabilities that allow it to reach
> high-precision performance approaching high-end ring laser gyro
> accuracies in much smaller, less expensive packages. SBG owns an
> extensive set of temperature chambers combined with rotary tables and
> vibrating tables. Each SBG system gets to stay two to five days
> inside these calibration tools. But the “secret sauce” is in a
> state-of-the-art SBG developed calibration algorithm…
>
> SBG buys MEMS gyros and accelerometers from MEMS manufacturers such
> as Colibrys, Analogue Devices and Silicon Sensing and builds complete
> inertial systems. The team embeds different GNSS receivers, depending
> on the product line and intended application — from miniature
> automotive-grade chipsets from u-blox to the very best from the key
> survey-grade players such as Septentrio, NovAtel and Trimble. Some
> customers may already have their own GNSS receiver, so SBG has
> developed and tuned their systems to work with any of these big
> manufacturers. The antenna employed depends on the receiver being
> used — from Tallysman Wireless and Antcom to Trimble, Septentrio or
> NovAtel — a very diversified range of antennas.






-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#509752

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/26/15 11:01 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> It is obvious the spamming shit head does not understand inertial
>> guidance.
> 
>   The jimp -- jimp, the name caller, is stuck in old technology. It's
>   time for jimp, the name caller, to move into the future and learn
>   about MEMS.

It is time for the spamming shit head to get an education so he doesn't
step on his own dick when he attempts to use his own words instead of
copying off topic crap from some web site.

It does not matter what technology you use to implement an inertial
system; all inertial systems must be initialized and all intertial
systems suffer from integration drift shit head.

No technology short of magic can change that, shit for brains.

As you don't actually understand physics, shit for brains, you can not
understand why that is true, ass hole.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#509795

On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 23:17:06 +0000, jimp wrote:

> It does not matter what technology you use to implement an inertial
> system...

Yes, it does.  If one can put an inertial guidance system into something 
the size of a pinhead, there are a lot of places where one might want to 
use such a system, places where a laser-ring won't fit.

> ... all inertial systems must be initialized and all intertial systems
> suffer from integration drift....

Yes, we know that.  By now everyone knows.

-- 
Goat

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#509767

On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 6:30:33 PM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 7/26/15 11:01 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > It is obvious the spamming shit head does not understand inertial
> > guidance.

Jim, your patience is legend! Very inspirational indeed.

>    The jimp -- jimp, the name caller, is stuck in old technology. It's
>    time for jimp, the name caller, to move into the future and learn
>    about MEMS.

How exactly, you fucking ass hole Sam, is new technology divorced
from, as you insist, old technology? How does an atom determine (aka,
post determisitically know) where it is, was, or will be, regardless
of any of anyone's on EARTH fancy assigned acronym?

>    Another MEMS Success Story
>  > http://gpsworld.com/another-mems-success-story/

[snip copyright violating, Usenet abusing, Sam's C&P]

-- Mahipal 'I can be polite, a gentleman too. I can Can CAN!'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#509794

On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 08:26:20 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

> On 7/25/15 11:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>> Which needs to be calibrated from a space based standard.
>>
>>
>    It appears the jimp does not understand MEMS.
> 
>    Because MEMS already know where they are, they can be used to deliver
>    ordinance with precision even without any GNSS.

Not much time to drift if you're an artillery shell or a guided bomb.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web