Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #565334 > unrolled thread

Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused

Started byJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post2016-03-24 20:11 -0700
Last post2016-03-27 05:09 +0000
Articles 5 on this page of 25 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:11 -0700
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 07:30 +0100
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 05:10 -0700
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:25 +0100
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Bojana Kudryavtseva <bojkud@rtyn56h67i.org> - 2016-03-26 10:33 +0000
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:36 -0400
              Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-27 05:04 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 05:12 +0200
                  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 21:37 +0200
                    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Ewan <iq49j@noemail.edu> - 2016-03-28 19:52 +0000
                      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-30 06:38 +0200
                    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-29 20:02 +0200
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:04 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 17:13 +0100
              Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:36 -0700
              Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 23:54 -0700
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:39 +0100
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:10 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 14:02 -0700
              Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-29 18:49 -0500
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-25 18:20 +0000
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 13:04 -0700
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-26 18:05 +0000
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:19 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-27 05:09 +0000

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#565538

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-03-25 18:20 +0000
Message-ID<q3cgsc-s1t.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#565334
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 1:54:25 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>> 
> Science is confused about water

The only ones confused about water are delusional kooks.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#565571

FromSolving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-25 13:04 -0700
Message-ID<355b5d7f-58ab-4e26-a925-6aa674afd9af@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#565538
On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 1:54:25 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> >> 
> > Science is confused about water
> 
> The only ones confused about water are delusional kooks.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

LOL.  You got it all figured out?  Your one sentence responses suggest otherwise, dumbass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#565781

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-03-26 18:05 +0000
Message-ID<hkvisc-uua.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#565571
Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 1:54:25 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>> >> 
>> > Science is confused about water
>> 
>> The only ones confused about water are delusional kooks.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> LOL.  You got it all figured out?

Nope, it was all figured out by physicists and chemists long before either
of us were born.

You can find this in books and the titles to some have already been spoon
fed to you.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#565783

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-26 11:19 -0700
Message-ID<37c0eb46-ff71-4329-a254-7fdddc0fa3a9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#565781
On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 11:16:06 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 1:54:25 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> > Science is confused about water
> >> 
> >> The only ones confused about water are delusional kooks.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Jim Pennino
> > 
> > LOL.  You got it all figured out?
> 
> Nope, it was all figured out by physicists and chemists long before either
> of us were born.
> 
> You can find this in books and the titles to some have already been spoon
> fed to you.
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

If you can explain even one of H2O's 70 amomalies you might win the Nobel prize.  So, what are you waiting for?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#565862

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-03-27 05:09 +0000
Message-ID<kg6ksc-ete.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#565783
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 11:16:06 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 1:54:25 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> > Science is confused about water
>> >> 
>> >> The only ones confused about water are delusional kooks.
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> -- 
>> >> Jim Pennino
>> > 
>> > LOL.  You got it all figured out?
>> 
>> Nope, it was all figured out by physicists and chemists long before either
>> of us were born.
>> 
>> You can find this in books and the titles to some have already been spoon
>> fed to you.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> If you can explain even one of H2O's 70 amomalies you might win the
> Nobel prize.  So, what are you waiting for?

As H2O was all explained many, many years ago, as I said above, it is
much too late for a Nobel.

As your reading comprehension is nil, it is no wonder you believe there
are unsolved mysteries of H2O.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web