Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #555525 > unrolled thread

Loons talking to loons on Tall blokes Talk Shop

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Loons talking to loons on Tall blokes Talk Shop James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 09:24 -0800
    Re: Loons talking to loons on Tall blokes Talk Shop Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 17:45 -0600
    Re: Loons talking to loons on Tall blokes Talk Shop jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-23 00:07 +0000

#555525 — Loons talking to loons on Tall blokes Talk Shop

https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/06/11/atmospheric-convection-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-8/#comment-113971

Loons talking to loons.  Surricat blathers on about triviality.  Will dances all over pretending to have something important to say.  

Here is what it comes down to fellas.  Our atmosphere is continually charged with static electricity from the solar wind.  This gives our atmosphere a net negative charge.  Microdroplets of H2O have a net positive charge.  This is generally referred to, or is a consequence of, H2O's high surface tension and the fact that microdroplets have a greater ratio of surface to weight compared to a body of liquid water.  This causes/explains evaporation.  

You loons need to take note of the fact that this allows us to explain evaporation without the absurd assumptions that water turns gaseous at temperatures below its known boiling temperature/pressure.

Loons tend to assume the laws of nature can be altered.  This is the kind of lunacy that brought us notions like global warming, crop circles, Bigfoot, etc.

If you bend the laws of nature to make the facts fit beliefs you are not being a scientist, you are just another loon.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#555677

   James McGinn says, "I am a serial science theorist. I'm obsesses
   with finding what people think is true but really isn't and then
   using knowledge from other disciplines to reveal what is actually
   true. The two books I've authored here for kindle are in the field
   of meteorology. And even though I took classes in meteorology (as
   an Earth Sciences Major) I don't consider myself a Meteorologist.
   My other interests include Paleoanthropology, Climatology, and
   Complexity Theory, and Physics".

   I think this should read, "I am a serial science terrorist. I'm
   obsessed with finding what people think is true but really isn't
   and then using knowledge from other disciplines to reveal what is
   actually true. Observational and experimental data can not compete
   with my serial science terrorism".

   I consider you an untutored fool, but there is always hope. For
   example:

   Water vapour (gas) exists well below freezing and well about boiling.
   Even found in the solar atmosphere (hot) and interstellar space
   (cold).

   Water vapour (gas)
 > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_vapor

 > Water vapor, water vapour or aqueous vapor, is the gaseous phase of
 > water. It is one state of water within the hydrosphere. Water vapor
 > can be produced from the evaporation or boiling of liquid water or
 > from the sublimation of ice. Unlike other forms of water, water vapor
 > is invisible.[4] Under typical atmospheric conditions, water vapor is
 > continuously generated by evaporation and removed by condensation. It
 > is lighter than air and triggers convection currents that can lead to
 > clouds.
 >
 > Being a component of Earth's hydrosphere and hydrologic cycle, it is
 > particularly abundant in Earth's atmosphere where it is also a potent
 > greenhouse gas along with other gases such as carbon dioxide and
 > methane. Use of water vapor, as steam, has been important to humans
 > for cooking and as a major component in energy production and
 > transport systems since the industrial revolution.
 >
 > Water vapor is a relatively common atmospheric constituent, present
 > even in the solar atmosphere as well as every planet in the Solar
 > System and many astronomical objects including natural satellites,
 > comets and even large asteroids.





-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555682

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/06/11/atmospheric-convection-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-8/#comment-113971
> 
> Loons talking to loons.  Surricat blathers on about triviality.  Will
> dances all over pretending to have something important to say.  
> 
> Here is what it comes down to fellas.  Our atmosphere is continually
> charged with static electricity from the solar wind.  This gives our
> atmosphere a net negative charge.

Only the troposphere is charged, if it were otherwise radio wouldn't work
and the charge would show up on an electroscope, which it doesn't.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web