Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #729181 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-26 05:01 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-03-06 00:25 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 267 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-26 05:01 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 22:43 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 04:22 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 06:54 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 10:08 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 08:14 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 11:31 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:22 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 12:30 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:52 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 14:06 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Agent 007" <007@who.cares> - 2019-02-26 17:08 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 20:22 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:21 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 08:47 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 12:29 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:17 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:21 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:54 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 14:10 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 14:57 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2019-02-27 13:31 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-26 11:32 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 11:42 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 10:42 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:30 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 13:57 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:00 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 18:12 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-27 05:29 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-26 20:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 21:09 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-27 00:46 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-26 23:49 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 22:33 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-27 08:22 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:17 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-28 00:07 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 23:09 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-28 10:11 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 08:04 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-01 06:46 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 01:10 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-01 11:30 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-01 09:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 12:12 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-01 10:53 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 12:38 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 16:26 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 14:32 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 17:45 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-02 05:48 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-02 03:55 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 23:53 -0800
The only thing women like more than fake boobs is fake marriages. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-03-02 19:24 -0800
Re: The only thing women like more than fake boobs is fake marriages. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-02 22:26 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 12:37 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-01 10:54 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-02 05:47 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 00:18 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-03 06:48 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 10:11 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 20:09 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 16:01 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-03 15:57 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 23:53 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 19:43 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:50 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 19:56 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 18:53 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-04 05:49 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 10:40 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 10:01 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 12:11 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 09:28 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 12:36 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 10:46 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 20:28 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:31 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 17:58 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 21:12 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 18:27 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 21:51 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 20:27 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:30 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 15:53 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:59 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-05 06:04 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 22:20 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 10:09 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-05 00:00 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 05:29 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> - 2019-03-04 14:34 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-05 00:04 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> - 2019-03-05 03:08 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-05 07:18 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-03-04 15:31 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 15:53 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-04 10:34 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 14:55 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 17:08 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:14 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 17:23 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:28 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 10:33 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 13:17 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 20:10 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 13:26 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-03 16:41 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 16:57 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-03 16:03 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 15:19 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 23:59 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 19:49 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 18:54 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 18:51 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-03 17:35 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:38 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-03 18:08 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-03 18:33 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:16 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-03-04 01:09 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 18:12 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 23:55 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:11 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 04:28 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 22:46 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-04 09:21 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 23:29 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 20:29 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:33 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 18:00 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-05 06:06 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 22:19 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-05 21:37 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 17:24 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-05 22:41 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-05 18:06 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 15:38 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-05 22:11 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-06 05:18 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 23:03 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-06 15:18 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-06 13:22 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-06 15:15 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 15:36 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 14:57 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-03 22:59 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-03 15:10 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 00:01 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 18:45 -0700
People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-03-02 18:58 -0800
Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-03 06:50 +0200
Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-03 12:35 +0000
Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 09:15 -0700
Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-04 05:55 +0200
Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-03 12:33 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 11:25 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-27 11:30 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:50 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 13:05 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-27 13:31 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 13:39 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:37 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 11:40 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:49 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 11:51 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:53 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 11:58 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 12:02 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 12:20 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:49 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 17:55 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:05 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 18:59 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:35 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:44 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 20:04 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:07 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-27 19:21 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:26 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 13:44 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:52 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 14:05 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 12:35 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 14:38 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-27 22:12 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 23:10 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:27 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 17:31 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:43 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 17:48 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:03 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 18:59 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:24 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:36 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:43 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 20:04 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:06 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-27 16:54 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:09 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-27 17:16 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:30 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 06:05 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 14:22 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 06:43 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-28 16:21 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-27 16:32 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-28 01:46 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 01:50 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 14:22 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 06:42 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 15:09 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 07:32 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 15:41 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 07:53 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-28 05:20 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:27 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:51 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-28 21:13 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-28 16:16 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 16:47 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 14:20 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 16:44 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 14:24 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-28 23:15 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 00:55 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 01:57 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-02-28 09:35 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-28 10:14 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 11:11 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-28 23:04 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 16:17 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-28 05:17 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:26 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-28 10:13 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-01 06:48 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 09:46 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 10:21 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:28 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 13:53 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 18:09 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-01 13:09 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-02 22:27 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-03-06 00:25 +0000
Page 9 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 14 Next page →
| From | Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 22:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsAA07B703EBDEFgreyghost471bazinga@144.76.35.198> |
| In reply to | #730039 |
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:q5fmav$bhn$3@gioia.aioe.org: > On 3/2/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> by Checkmate! In article <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> ¤ It's 30%. >> ¤ >> ¤ 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our >> burning of ¤ fossil fuels. >> ¤ >> ¤ 30%. >> >> Maybe, maybe not... who really knows? > > The scientists who measure these things know. And now you do too. > >> You're talking about 30% of 0.04%, or 0.012%. IOW, <SPANK> > > https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-free-arctic-in-pliocene- > last-time-co2-levels-above-400ppm/ > > If the levels remain this high for very long (a century or less) that > means bye-bye Greenland Ice Sheet. And bye-bye Manhattan, London, > Miami Beach, Hong Kong ......... > Who would miss Manhattan and London? They are cesspools of liberal depravity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 15:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <q5hmtl$1acv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #730182 |
On 3/3/2019 2:59 PM, Avenging Angel wrote: > kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in > news:q5fmav$bhn$3@gioia.aioe.org: > >> On 3/2/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>> by Checkmate! In article <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> ¤ It's 30%. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our >>> burning of ¤ fossil fuels. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ 30%. >>> >>> Maybe, maybe not... who really knows? >> >> The scientists who measure these things know. And now you do too. >> >>> You're talking about 30% of 0.04%, or 0.012%. IOW, <SPANK> >> >> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-free-arctic-in-pliocene- >> last-time-co2-levels-above-400ppm/ >> >> If the levels remain this high for very long (a century or less) that >> means bye-bye Greenland Ice Sheet. And bye-bye Manhattan, London, >> Miami Beach, Hong Kong ......... >> > > Who would miss Manhattan and London? They are cesspools of liberal > depravity. > Humanity would miss the inhabitants? Loved ones would really miss them? An individual inhabitants point of view has nothing to do with it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-04 00:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q5hptk$rt1$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #730182 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 22:59:28 +0000, Davros, socked up as "Avenging Angel", wrote: > kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in > news:q5fmav$bhn$3@gioia.aioe.org: > >> On 3/2/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>> by Checkmate! In article <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> ¤ It's 30%. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our >>> burning of ¤ fossil fuels. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ 30%. >>> >>> Maybe, maybe not... who really knows? >> >> The scientists who measure these things know. And now you do too. >> >>> You're talking about 30% of 0.04%, or 0.012%. IOW, <SPANK> >> >> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-free-arctic-in-pliocene- >> last-time-co2-levels-above-400ppm/ >> >> If the levels remain this high for very long (a century or less) that >> means bye-bye Greenland Ice Sheet. And bye-bye Manhattan, London, Miami >> Beach, Hong Kong ......... > > Who would miss Manhattan and London? A Dalek wouldn't. :P -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 18:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ge3e9pFgvg2U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #730182 |
On 3/3/19 3:59 PM, Avenging Angel wrote: > kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in > news:q5fmav$bhn$3@gioia.aioe.org: > >> On 3/2/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>> by Checkmate! In article <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> ¤ It's 30%. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our >>> burning of ¤ fossil fuels. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ 30%. >>> >>> Maybe, maybe not... who really knows? >> >> The scientists who measure these things know. And now you do too. >> >>> You're talking about 30% of 0.04%, or 0.012%. IOW, <SPANK> >> >> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-free-arctic-in-pliocene- >> last-time-co2-levels-above-400ppm/ >> >> If the levels remain this high for very long (a century or less) that >> means bye-bye Greenland Ice Sheet. And bye-bye Manhattan, London, >> Miami Beach, Hong Kong ......... >> > > Who would miss Manhattan and London? They are cesspools of liberal > depravity. > Such as? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 18:58 -0800 |
| Subject | People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.2--6.58pm.Seattle.2019> |
| In reply to | #729885 |
Kensi: > 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere > was emitted by our burning of fossil fuels. Plants prefer warmer weather, with more carbon dioxide; likewise, people prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. The North Pole was tropical 55 million years ago, when/where we primates first appeared. Entropy is eternal; The Known Universe is going from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse. 12.5 billion years ago, quasar J2157-3602 had the power of 695 trillion suns ( 2.66×10^41 Watts ); in comparison, the most luminous hypernovae (ASASSN-15lh) peaked at 572 billion suns. The Known Universe had less entropy 12.5 billion years ago, hence the greater luminosity/power/Watts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 06:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. |
| Message-ID | <q5fmf7$bhn$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #730030 |
On 3/2/2019 9:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi: >> 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere >> was emitted by our burning of fossil fuels. > > Plants prefer warmer weather, with more carbon dioxide<SPANK> https://phys.org/news/2009-06-extinction-biodiversity-atmospheric-co2-previously.html -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 12:35 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. |
| Message-ID | <XnsAA074D4293A4Fgreyghost471bazinga@144.76.35.198> |
| In reply to | #730040 |
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:q5fmf7$bhn$4@gioia.aioe.org: > On 3/2/2019 9:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Kensi: >>> 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere >>> was emitted by our burning of fossil fuels. >> >> Plants prefer warmer weather, with more carbon dioxide<SPANK> > https://phys.org/news/2009-06-extinction-biodiversity-atmospheric-co2-p > reviously.html > Which is why in earlier epochs huigher CO2 led to whta, dimwit? Plants consume CO2
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 09:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. |
| Message-ID | <ge2ctnF9v2hU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #730077 |
On 3/3/19 5:35 AM, Avenging Angel wrote: > kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in > news:q5fmf7$bhn$4@gioia.aioe.org: > >> On 3/2/2019 9:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Kensi: >>>> 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere >>>> was emitted by our burning of fossil fuels. >>> >>> Plants prefer warmer weather, with more carbon dioxide<SPANK> >> https://phys.org/news/2009-06-extinction-biodiversity-atmospheric-co2-p >> reviously.html >> > > Which is why in earlier epochs huigher CO2 led to whta, dimwit? Plants > consume CO2 > Do you think you know better than all the world scientists? Teemember that no scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these conclusions: • "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia". • "Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide have increased to levels unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years". • Human influence on the climate system is clear. It is extremely likely (95-100% probability) that human influence was the dominant cause of global warming between 1951-2010. • "Increasing magnitudes of [global] warming increase the likelihood of severe, pervasive, and irreversible impacts" • "A first step towards adaptation to future climate change is reducing vulnerability and exposure to present climate variability" • "The overall risks of climate change impacts can be reduced by limiting the rate and magnitude of climate change" • Without new policies to mitigate climate change, projections suggest an increase in global mean temperature in 2100 of 3.7 to 4.8 °C, relative to pre-industrial levels (median values; the range is 2.5 to 7.8 °C including climate uncertainty). • The current trajectory of global greenhouse gas emissions is not consistent with limiting global warming to below 1.5 or 2 °C, relative to pre-industrial levels. Pledges made as part of the Cancún Agreements are broadly consistent with cost-effective scenarios that give a "likely" chance (66-100% probability) of limiting global warming (in 2100) to below 3 °C, relative to pre-industrial levels. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-04 05:55 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. |
| Message-ID | <q5i7k4$1etl$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #730077 |
On 3/3/2019 7:35 AM, Avenging Angel wrote: > kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in > news:q5fmf7$bhn$4@gioia.aioe.org: > >> On 3/2/2019 9:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Kensi: >>>> 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere >>>> was emitted by our burning of fossil fuels. >>> >>> Plants prefer warmer weather, with more carbon dioxide<SPANK> >> https://phys.org/news/2009-06-extinction-biodiversity-atmospheric-co2-p >> reviously.html > > Which is why in earlier epochs huigher CO2 led to whta The Permian extinction event, among other things, spankard k00k. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 12:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. |
| Message-ID | <XnsAA074CF678ED0greyghost471bazinga@144.76.35.198> |
| In reply to | #730030 |
Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote in news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.2--6.58pm.Seattle.2019: > The North Pole was tropical 55 million years ago, > when/where we primates first appeared. Um Where was the North Pole 55 million years ago? Do you mean the axis on which the earth turns od the magnetic North Pole which moves?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 11:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <s9ed7ehvhvg3735mcj5g58o4lt64rfnoi1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #729349 |
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 05:29:24 +0200, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 2/26/2019 11:32 AM, stinky puddles piddled: >> There is no scientific proof that the climate change that is >> occurring has anything to do with human activity.<SPANK> > >https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm > >When presented with the overwhelming evidence that the planet is >warming, many people react by asking "but how can we be sure that we’re >causing the warming?" It turns out that the observed global warming has >a distinct human fingerprint on it. The only distinct human fingerprints are from a bunch of stupid leftist alarmists who programmed the computer climate models which have been proven to use bogus data and which, to date, have been WAY WAY WAY too unreliable because of GIGO. And, still there is no proof forthcoming from teh kensitard. -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 11:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q56hha$1etp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729406 |
On 2/27/2019 10:25 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 05:29:24 +0200, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 2/26/2019 11:32 AM, stinky puddles piddled: >>> There is no scientific proof that the climate change that is >>> occurring has anything to do with human activity.<SPANK> >> >> https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm >> >> When presented with the overwhelming evidence that the planet is >> warming, many people react by asking "but how can we be sure that we’re >> causing the warming?" It turns out that the observed global warming has >> a distinct human fingerprint on it. > > The only distinct human fingerprints are from > a bunch of stupid leftist alarmists who programmed > the computer climate models which have been proven > to use bogus data and which, to date, have been > WAY WAY WAY too unreliable because of GIGO. > > And, still there is no proof forthcoming from teh > kensitard. > article is full of conjecture, bad references, and climate frothing. there *may be* evidence that kensi pupa is *further mentally retarding* as 'her' head warms with climate change, and *too many doughnuts*.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 17:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gdo0vmF1a77U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #729406 |
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 05:29:24 +0200, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 2/26/2019 11:32 AM, stinky puddles piddled: >>> There is no scientific proof that the climate change that is >>> occurring has anything to do with human activity.<SPANK> >> >> https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm >> >> When presented with the overwhelming evidence that the planet is >> warming, many people react by asking "but how can we be sure that we’re >> causing the warming?" It turns out that the observed global warming has >> a distinct human fingerprint on it. > > The only distinct human fingerprints are from > a bunch of stupid leftist alarmists who programmed > the computer climate models which have been proven > to use bogus data and which, to date, have been > WAY WAY WAY too unreliable because of GIGO. > > And, still there is no proof forthcoming from teh > kensitard. > You are a science denier. Got it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 13:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6ijd7e99in95ujludl0ccbvs93gk6b6huq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #729415 |
On 27 Feb 2019 17:50:47 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: <...> >You are a science denier. Got it. The only thing you get, Snit, is a big raspberry from all of us who read your puerile illogic supported by your ad hominem attacks. It just happens that Yours Truly is a student of science and, as such, I know what the scientific method is and how it works. YOU DON'T or you wouldn't believe AGW. FYI, you warmingtards have it exactly backwards. **Here's how the scientific method actually works: 1) create a hypothesis, 2) do your best to find examples that DISPROVE that hypothesis. If no examples can be found then there is a chance the hypothesis may be a valid one. **Here's how you warmingtards do it and you claim it is science: 1) create a dire prediction or a set of dire predictions that can further your socialist/communist agenda, 2) do NOTHING to rebut the dire predictions but only look for things, no matter how far-fetched, that seem to support your prediction. When a few things are found that support the prediction then run around yelling, "That's proof, that's settled science and anybody who claims otherwise is a conservative asshole!" HOW FUCKING DROLL !!!!!!!! -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 13:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q56l1h$1vng$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729416 |
On 2/27/2019 1:05 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On 27 Feb 2019 17:50:47 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > <...> > >> You are a science denier. Got it. > > The only thing you get, Snit, is a big > raspberry from all of us who read your > puerile illogic supported by your ad hominem > attacks. > > It just happens that Yours Truly is a > student of science and, as such, I know > what the scientific method is and how it > works. > > YOU DON'T or you wouldn't believe AGW. > > FYI, you warmingtards have it exactly backwards. > > **Here's how the scientific method actually works: > > 1) create a hypothesis, > > 2) do your best to find examples that DISPROVE > that hypothesis. If no examples can be found then > there is a chance the hypothesis may be a valid one. > > **Here's how you warmingtards do it and you claim it > is science: > > 1) create a dire prediction or a set of dire predictions > that can further your socialist/communist agenda, > > 2) do NOTHING to rebut the dire predictions but only > look for things, no matter how far-fetched, that > seem to support your prediction. When a few things > are found that support the prediction then run around > yelling, "That's proof, that's settled science and anybody > who claims otherwise is a conservative asshole!" > > HOW FUCKING DROLL !!!!!!!! What do the squirrels think? Have you spoken with the squirrels? As you know, squirrels are not beholden to gummint largess and their opinions are uncolored by socialist/communist agendae. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 11:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gdo3qmF1rtnU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #729419 |
On 2/27/19 11:31 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 2/27/2019 1:05 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On 27 Feb 2019 17:50:47 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> <...> >> >>> You are a science denier. Got it. >> >> The only thing you get, Snit, is a big >> raspberry from all of us who read your >> puerile illogic supported by your ad hominem >> attacks. >> >> It just happens that Yours Truly is a >> student of science and, as such, I know >> what the scientific method is and how it >> works. >> >> YOU DON'T or you wouldn't believe AGW. >> >> FYI, you warmingtards have it exactly backwards. >> >> **Here's how the scientific method actually works: >> >> 1) create a hypothesis, >> >> 2) do your best to find examples that DISPROVE >> that hypothesis. If no examples can be found then >> there is a chance the hypothesis may be a valid one. >> >> **Here's how you warmingtards do it and you claim it >> is science: >> >> 1) create a dire prediction or a set of dire predictions >> that can further your socialist/communist agenda, >> >> 2) do NOTHING to rebut the dire predictions but only >> look for things, no matter how far-fetched, that >> seem to support your prediction. When a few things >> are found that support the prediction then run around >> yelling, "That's proof, that's settled science and anybody >> who claims otherwise is a conservative asshole!" >> >> HOW FUCKING DROLL !!!!!!!! > > What do the squirrels think? Have you spoken with the squirrels? As > you know, squirrels are not beholden to gummint largess and their > opinions are uncolored by socialist/communist agendae. > Gregory Hall denies science and cries when called out on it. Meanwhile we have better and better evidence all the time: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-temperatures/evidence-for-man-made-global-warming-hits-gold-standard-scientists-idUSKCN1QE1ZU ----- Evidence for man-made global warming has reached a “gold standard” level of certainty, adding pressure for cuts in greenhouse gases to limit rising temperatures, scientists said on Monday. “Humanity cannot afford to ignore such clear signals,” the U.S.-led team wrote in the journal Nature Climate Change of satellite measurements of rising temperatures over the past 40 years. They said confidence that human activities were raising the heat at the Earth’s surface had reached a “five-sigma” level, a statistical gauge meaning there is only a one-in-a-million chance that the signal would appear if there was no warming. Such a “gold standard” was applied in 2012, for instance, to confirm the discovery of the Higgs boson subatomic particle, a basic building block of the universe. Benjamin Santer, lead author of Monday’s study at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, said he hoped the findings would win over skeptics and spur action. ----- -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 13:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v8md7ed57truredepcckgh3t848aff345t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #729419 |
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >On 2/27/2019, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On 27 Feb 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> <...> >> >>> You are a science denier. Got it. >> >> The only thing you get, Snit, is a big >> raspberry from all of us who read your >> puerile illogic supported by your ad hominem >> attacks. >> >> It just happens that Yours Truly is a >> student of science and, as such, I know >> what the scientific method is and how it >> works. >> >> YOU DON'T or you wouldn't believe AGW. >> >> FYI, you warmingtards have it exactly backwards. >> >> **Here's how the scientific method actually works: >> >> 1) create a hypothesis, >> >> 2) do your best to find examples that DISPROVE >> that hypothesis. If no examples can be found then >> there is a chance the hypothesis may be a valid one. >> >> **Here's how you warmingtards do it and you claim it >> is science: >> >> 1) create a dire prediction or a set of dire predictions >> that can further your socialist/communist agenda, >> >> 2) do NOTHING to rebut the dire predictions but only >> look for things, no matter how far-fetched, that >> seem to support your prediction. When a few things >> are found that support the prediction then run around >> yelling, "That's proof, that's settled science and anybody >> who claims otherwise is a conservative asshole!" >> >> HOW FUCKING DROLL !!!!!!!! > >What do the squirrels think? Have you spoken with the squirrels? As >you know, squirrels are not beholden to gummint largess and their >opinions are uncolored by socialist/communist agendae. My squirrels don't say anything. They are too busy gathering and burying in-the-shell, raw peanuts to sit on their little haunches and talk to me. -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 11:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gdo3mgF1rtnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #729416 |
On 2/27/19 11:05 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On 27 Feb 2019 17:50:47 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > <...> > >> You are a science denier. Got it. > > The only thing you get, Snit, is a big > raspberry from all of us who read your > puerile illogic supported by your ad hominem > attacks. This has nothing to do with me. This is about the science -- and you claim to deny it. It DOES give Just Wondering a chance to jump in and say he against you bringing up your anti-science stance. I suspect he will not... but we shall see. > It just happens that Yours Truly is a > student of science and, as such, I know > what the scientific method is and how it > works. This is irrelevant to the fact you are denying climate science. > YOU DON'T or you wouldn't believe AGW. This is you pushing an unsupported claim tied to your denial of science. > FYI, you warmingtards have it exactly backwards. > > **Here's how the scientific method actually works: > > 1) create a hypothesis, > > 2) do your best to find examples that DISPROVE > that hypothesis. If no examples can be found then > there is a chance the hypothesis may be a valid one. > > **Here's how you warmingtards do it and you claim it > is science: > > 1) create a dire prediction or a set of dire predictions > that can further your socialist/communist agenda, > > 2) do NOTHING to rebut the dire predictions but only > look for things, no matter how far-fetched, that > seem to support your prediction. When a few things > are found that support the prediction then run around > yelling, "That's proof, that's settled science and anybody > who claims otherwise is a conservative asshole!" > > HOW FUCKING DROLL !!!!!!!! > Keep in mind that using the scientific method there is only a very, very small chance that the climate science we see is NOT tied to man's action: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-temperatures/evidence-for-man-made-global-warming-hits-gold-standard-scientists-idUSKCN1QE1ZU ----- Evidence for man-made global warming has reached a “gold standard” level of certainty, adding pressure for cuts in greenhouse gases to limit rising temperatures, scientists said on Monday. “Humanity cannot afford to ignore such clear signals,” the U.S.-led team wrote in the journal Nature Climate Change of satellite measurements of rising temperatures over the past 40 years. They said confidence that human activities were raising the heat at the Earth’s surface had reached a “five-sigma” level, a statistical gauge meaning there is only a one-in-a-million chance that the signal would appear if there was no warming. Such a “gold standard” was applied in 2012, for instance, to confirm the discovery of the Higgs boson subatomic particle, a basic building block of the universe. Benjamin Santer, lead author of Monday’s study at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, said he hoped the findings would win over skeptics and spur action. ----- But you will deny it. Science is denied by many on the right for political reasons, and they they try to insist that those who accept the science do so for political reasons as well, which is a lie. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 11:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c13b4a.34b.19.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #729420 |
On 2019-02-27 11:37 a.m., Snit wrote: > On 2/27/19 11:05 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On 27 Feb 2019 17:50:47 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >>> You are a science denier. Got it. >> >> The only thing you get, Snit, is a big >> raspberry from all of us who read your >> puerile illogic supported by your ad hominem >> attacks. > > This has nothing to do with me. This is about the science -- and you > claim to deny it. > > It DOES give Just Wondering a chance to jump in and say he against you > bringing up your anti-science stance. I suspect he will not... but we > shall see. > >> It just happens that Yours Truly is a >> student of science and, as such, I know >> what the scientific method is and how it >> works. > > This is irrelevant to the fact you are denying climate science. > >> YOU DON'T or you wouldn't believe AGW. > > This is you pushing an unsupported claim tied to your denial of science. > >> FYI, you warmingtards have it exactly backwards. >> >> **Here's how the scientific method actually works: >> >> 1) create a hypothesis, >> >> 2) do your best to find examples that DISPROVE >> that hypothesis. If no examples can be found then >> there is a chance the hypothesis may be a valid one. >> >> **Here's how you warmingtards do it and you claim it >> is science: >> >> 1) create a dire prediction or a set of dire predictions >> that can further your socialist/communist agenda, >> >> 2) do NOTHING to rebut the dire predictions but only >> look for things, no matter how far-fetched, that >> seem to support your prediction. When a few things >> are found that support the prediction then run around >> yelling, "That's proof, that's settled science and anybody >> who claims otherwise is a conservative asshole!" >> >> HOW FUCKING DROLL !!!!!!!! >> > > Keep in mind that using the scientific method there is only a very, very > small chance that the climate science we see is NOT tied to man's action: > > > https://www.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-temperatures/evidence-for-man-made-global-warming-hits-gold-standard-scientists-idUSKCN1QE1ZU > > ----- > Evidence for man-made global warming has reached a “gold standard” level > of certainty, adding pressure for cuts in greenhouse gases to limit > rising temperatures, scientists said on Monday. > > “Humanity cannot afford to ignore such clear signals,” the U.S.-led team > wrote in the journal Nature Climate Change of satellite measurements of > rising temperatures over the past 40 years. > > They said confidence that human activities were raising the heat at the > Earth’s surface had reached a “five-sigma” level, a statistical gauge > meaning there is only a one-in-a-million chance that the signal would > appear if there was no warming. > > Such a “gold standard” was applied in 2012, for instance, to confirm the > discovery of the Higgs boson subatomic particle, a basic building block > of the universe. > > Benjamin Santer, lead author of Monday’s study at the Lawrence Livermore > National Laboratory in California, said he hoped the findings would win > over skeptics and spur action. > ----- > > But you will deny it. Science is denied by many on the right for > political reasons, and they they try to insist that those who accept the > science do so for political reasons as well, which is a lie. > > no some do i saw them doing it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 11:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gdo4diF21ppU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #729423 |
On 2/27/19 11:40 AM, % wrote: > On 2019-02-27 11:37 a.m., Snit wrote: >> On 2/27/19 11:05 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On 27 Feb 2019 17:50:47 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>> <...> >>> >>>> You are a science denier. Got it. >>> >>> The only thing you get, Snit, is a big >>> raspberry from all of us who read your >>> puerile illogic supported by your ad hominem >>> attacks. >> >> This has nothing to do with me. This is about the science -- and you >> claim to deny it. >> >> It DOES give Just Wondering a chance to jump in and say he against you >> bringing up your anti-science stance. I suspect he will not... but we >> shall see. >> >>> It just happens that Yours Truly is a >>> student of science and, as such, I know >>> what the scientific method is and how it >>> works. >> >> This is irrelevant to the fact you are denying climate science. >> >>> YOU DON'T or you wouldn't believe AGW. >> >> This is you pushing an unsupported claim tied to your denial of science. >> >>> FYI, you warmingtards have it exactly backwards. >>> >>> **Here's how the scientific method actually works: >>> >>> 1) create a hypothesis, >>> >>> 2) do your best to find examples that DISPROVE >>> that hypothesis. If no examples can be found then >>> there is a chance the hypothesis may be a valid one. >>> >>> **Here's how you warmingtards do it and you claim it >>> is science: >>> >>> 1) create a dire prediction or a set of dire predictions >>> that can further your socialist/communist agenda, >>> >>> 2) do NOTHING to rebut the dire predictions but only >>> look for things, no matter how far-fetched, that >>> seem to support your prediction. When a few things >>> are found that support the prediction then run around >>> yelling, "That's proof, that's settled science and anybody >>> who claims otherwise is a conservative asshole!" >>> >>> HOW FUCKING DROLL !!!!!!!! >>> >> >> Keep in mind that using the scientific method there is only a very, >> very small chance that the climate science we see is NOT tied to man's >> action: >> >> >> https://www.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-temperatures/evidence-for-man-made-global-warming-hits-gold-standard-scientists-idUSKCN1QE1ZU >> >> ----- >> Evidence for man-made global warming has reached a “gold standard” >> level of certainty, adding pressure for cuts in greenhouse gases to >> limit rising temperatures, scientists said on Monday. >> >> “Humanity cannot afford to ignore such clear signals,” the U.S.-led >> team wrote in the journal Nature Climate Change of satellite >> measurements of rising temperatures over the past 40 years. >> >> They said confidence that human activities were raising the heat at >> the Earth’s surface had reached a “five-sigma” level, a statistical >> gauge meaning there is only a one-in-a-million chance that the signal >> would appear if there was no warming. >> >> Such a “gold standard” was applied in 2012, for instance, to confirm >> the discovery of the Higgs boson subatomic particle, a basic building >> block of the universe. >> >> Benjamin Santer, lead author of Monday’s study at the Lawrence >> Livermore National Laboratory in California, said he hoped the >> findings would win over skeptics and spur action. >> ----- >> >> But you will deny it. Science is denied by many on the right for >> political reasons, and they they try to insist that those who accept >> the science do so for political reasons as well, which is a lie. >> >> > no some do i saw them doing it One. But he recanted later. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web