Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #729181 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-26 05:01 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-03-01 13:09 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 164 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-26 05:01 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 22:43 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 04:22 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 06:54 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 10:08 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 08:14 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 11:31 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:22 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 12:30 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:52 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 14:06 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Agent 007" <007@who.cares> - 2019-02-26 17:08 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 20:22 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:21 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 08:47 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 12:29 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:17 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:21 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:54 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 14:10 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 14:57 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2019-02-27 13:31 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-26 11:32 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 11:42 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 10:42 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:30 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 13:57 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:00 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 18:12 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-27 05:29 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-26 20:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 21:09 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-27 00:46 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-26 23:49 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 22:33 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-27 08:22 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:17 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-28 00:07 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 23:09 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-28 10:11 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 08:04 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-01 06:46 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 01:10 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-01 11:30 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-01 09:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 12:12 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-01 10:53 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 12:38 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 16:26 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 14:32 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 17:45 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-02 05:48 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-02 03:55 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 23:53 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 12:37 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-01 10:54 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-02 05:47 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 00:18 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 11:25 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-27 11:30 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:50 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 13:05 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-27 13:31 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 13:39 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:37 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 11:40 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:49 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 11:51 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:53 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 11:58 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 12:02 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 12:20 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:49 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 17:55 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:05 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 18:59 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:35 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:44 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 20:04 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:07 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-27 19:21 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:26 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 13:44 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:52 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 14:05 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 12:35 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 14:38 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-27 22:12 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 23:10 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:27 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 17:31 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:43 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 17:48 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:03 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 18:59 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:24 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:36 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:43 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 20:04 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:06 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-27 16:54 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:09 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-27 17:16 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:30 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 06:05 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 14:22 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 06:43 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-28 16:21 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-27 16:32 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-28 01:46 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 01:50 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 14:22 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 06:42 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 15:09 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 07:32 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 15:41 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 07:53 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-28 05:20 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:27 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:51 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-28 21:13 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-28 16:16 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 16:47 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 14:20 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 16:44 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 14:24 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-28 23:15 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 00:55 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 01:57 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-02-28 09:35 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-28 10:14 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 11:11 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-28 23:04 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 16:17 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-28 05:17 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:26 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-28 10:13 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-01 06:48 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 09:46 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 10:21 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:28 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 13:53 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 18:09 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-01 13:09 +0000
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 05:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q5506i$cl7$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729245 |
On 2/26/2019 11:32 AM, stinky puddles piddled: > There is no scientific proof that the climate change that is > occurring has anything to do with human activity.<SPANK> https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm When presented with the overwhelming evidence that the planet is warming, many people react by asking "but how can we be sure that weโre causing the warming?" It turns out that the observed global warming has a distinct human fingerprint on it. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-26 20:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gdmf7sFlai1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #729349 |
On 2/26/19 8:29 PM, kensi wrote: > On 2/26/2019 11:32 AM, stinky puddles piddled: >> There is no scientific proof that the climate change that is >> occurring has anything to do with human activity.<SPANK> > > https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm > > When presented with the overwhelming evidence that the planet is > warming, many people react by asking "but how can we be sure that weโre > causing the warming?" It turns out that the observed global warming has > a distinct human fingerprint on it. Well, the confidence level still says there is a 1 in 1,000,000 chance it is not from man. That is what the anti-science crown focuses on. I wonder if they buy lottery tickets and are shocked when they do not win. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-temperatures/evidence-for-man-made-global-warming-hits-gold-standard-scientists-idUSKCN1QE1ZU ----- Evidence for man-made global warming has reached a โgold standardโ level of certainty, adding pressure for cuts in greenhouse gases to limit rising temperatures, scientists said on Monday. โHumanity cannot afford to ignore such clear signals,โ the U.S.-led team wrote in the journal Nature Climate Change of satellite measurements of rising temperatures over the past 40 years. They said confidence that human activities were raising the heat at the Earthโs surface had reached a โfive-sigmaโ level, a statistical gauge meaning there is only a one-in-a-million chance that the signal would appear if there was no warming. Such a โgold standardโ was applied in 2012, for instance, to confirm the discovery of the Higgs boson subatomic particle, a basic building block of the universe. Benjamin Santer, lead author of Mondayโs study at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, said he hoped the findings would win over skeptics and spur action. ----- -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-26 21:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36dfbb68ba682a8a9966c2@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #729349 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q5506i$cl7$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ยค ยค On 2/26/2019 11:32 AM, stinky puddles piddled: ยค > There is no scientific proof that the climate change that is ยค > occurring has anything to do with human activity.<SPANK> ยค ยค https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm ยค ยค When presented with the overwhelming evidence that the planet is ยค warming, many people react by asking "but how can we be sure that we?re ยค causing the warming?" It turns out that the observed global warming has ยค a distinct human fingerprint on it. This alleged "warming" is minimal at best, if you look at how climate has varied historically... a method that's flawed to begin with, since most climate history >~100 years old is extrapolated information, and inherently prone to intentional or even unintentional bias by the extrapolators. At any rate, the possibility that we can "change" things in any significant manner is highly unlikely, given our current population's requirements to survive in a society that wouldn't even exist as it does today, without fossil fuels. -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 00:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q55874$1eob$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729359 |
On 2/27/2019 12:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q5506i$cl7$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > > ยค > ยค On 2/26/2019 11:32 AM, stinky puddles piddled: > ยค > There is no scientific proof that the climate change that is > ยค > occurring has anything to do with human activity.<SPANK> > ยค > ยค https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm > ยค > ยค When presented with the overwhelming evidence that the planet is > ยค warming, many people react by asking "but how can we be sure that we?re > ยค causing the warming?" It turns out that the observed global warming has > ยค a distinct human fingerprint on it. > > This alleged "warming" is minimal at best, if you look at how climate has > varied historically... a method that's flawed to begin with, since most > climate history >~100 years old is extrapolated information, and > inherently prone to intentional or even unintentional bias by the > extrapolators. At any rate, the possibility that we can "change" things > in any significant manner is highly unlikely, given our current > population's requirements to survive in a society that wouldn't even > exist as it does today, without fossil fuels. Not extrapolated. Proxy data. Gasses in ice cores. Pollen. Distribution of plant and animal species. Isotope ratios. Lakes and rivers buried under sand. Fossil ketchup fries. Stuff like that.. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-26 23:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <8OOdnRRLYsxNuevBnZ2dnUU7-f_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #729361 |
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:46:09 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <q55874$1eob$1@gioia.aioe.org>: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On 2/27/2019 12:09 AM, ๐ฉ wrote: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก ๐ฉ! In article <q5506i$cl7$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ยค ยค On 2/26/2019 11:32 AM, stinky โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก puddles piddled: ยค > There is no scientific proof that the climate โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก change that is ยค > occurring has anything to do with human โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก activity.<SPANK> ยค ยค https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก ยค ยค When presented with the overwhelming evidence that the planet is โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก ยค warming, many people react by asking "but how can we be sure that โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก we?re ยค causing the warming?" It turns out that the observed global โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก warming has ยค a distinct human fingerprint on it. This alleged โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก "warming" is minimal at best, if you look at how climate has varied โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก historically... a method that's flawed to begin with, since most โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก climate history >~100 years old is extrapolated information, and โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก inherently prone to intentional or even unintentional bias by the โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก extrapolators. At any rate, the possibility that we can "change" โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก things in any significant manner is highly unlikely, given our current โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก population's requirements to survive in a society that wouldn't even โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก exist as it does today, without fossil fuels. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Not extrapolated. Proxy data. Gasses in ice cores. Pollen. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Distribution of plant and animal species. Isotope ratios. Lakes and โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก rivers buried under sand. Fossil ketchup fries. Stuff like that.. no they just say that so people watch fox news and the advertisers for cars they can't afford make lots of money selling cars to the people that are given tax breaks by the people they vote for. -- [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECKยฎ VALIDATION] THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-26 22:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36dfcf322080d6339966c6@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #729361 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q55874$1eob$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... ยค ยค On 2/27/2019 12:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: ยค > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ยค > Checkmate! In article <q5506i$cl7$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 ยค > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ยค > ยค > ยค > ยค ยค > ยค On 2/26/2019 11:32 AM, stinky puddles piddled: ยค > ยค > There is no scientific proof that the climate change that is ยค > ยค > occurring has anything to do with human activity.<SPANK> ยค > ยค ยค > ยค https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm ยค > ยค ยค > ยค When presented with the overwhelming evidence that the planet is ยค > ยค warming, many people react by asking "but how can we be sure that we?re ยค > ยค causing the warming?" It turns out that the observed global warming has ยค > ยค a distinct human fingerprint on it. ยค > ยค > This alleged "warming" is minimal at best, if you look at how climate has ยค > varied historically... a method that's flawed to begin with, since most ยค > climate history >~100 years old is extrapolated information, and ยค > inherently prone to intentional or even unintentional bias by the ยค > extrapolators. At any rate, the possibility that we can "change" things ยค > in any significant manner is highly unlikely, given our current ยค > population's requirements to survive in a society that wouldn't even ยค > exist as it does today, without fossil fuels. ยค ยค Not extrapolated. Proxy data. Gasses in ice cores. Pollen. ยค Distribution of plant and animal species. Isotope ratios. Lakes and ยค rivers buried under sand. Fossil ketchup fries. Stuff like that.. It's still extrapolated, IMO. How you gonna mass-spectrometerize the Tiny Bubbles inside an ice core without any contamination from the atmosphere, the ice, the extraction method or devices, and wishful thinking, when atmospheric CO2 is only around 400 PPM to begin with? -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 08:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q562u2$1a0a$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729364 |
On 2/27/2019 1:33 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q55874$1eob$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>On 2/27/2019 12:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <q5506i$cl7$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>> On 2/26/2019 11:32 AM, stinky puddles piddled: >>>>> There is no scientific proof that the climate change that is >>>>> occurring has anything to do with human activity.<SPANK> >>>> >>>> https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm >>>> >>>> When presented with the overwhelming evidence that the planet is >>>> warming, many people react by asking "but how can we be sure that we?re >>>> causing the warming?" It turns out that the observed global warming has >>>> a distinct human fingerprint on it. >>> >>> This alleged "warming" is minimal at best, if you look at how climate has >>> varied historically... a method that's flawed to begin with, since most >>> climate history >~100 years old is extrapolated information, and >>> inherently prone to intentional or even unintentional bias by the >>> extrapolators. At any rate, the possibility that we can "change" things >>> in any significant manner is highly unlikely, given our current >>> population's requirements to survive in a society that wouldn't even >>> exist as it does today, without fossil fuels. >> >> Not extrapolated. Proxy data. Gasses in ice cores. Pollen. >> Distribution of plant and animal species. Isotope ratios. Lakes and >> rivers buried under sand. Fossil ketchup fries. Stuff like that.. > > It's still extrapolated, IMO. How you gonna mass-spectrometerize the > Tiny Bubbles inside an ice core without any contamination from the > atmosphere, the ice, the extraction method or devices, and wishful > thinking, when atmospheric CO2 is only around 400 PPM to begin with? One uses multiple scientific methods and accounts for uncertainty in multiple ways. As far as sensitivity is concerned, you can convict a black guy based on a 0.1 ppb pee test that proves he done drank some water out the faucet what had 10 ppb cocaine in it from out the city water supply from out the river which is a parole violation. White people aren't guilty of that because they drink Fiji water, or maybe Italian fizzy volcano water. Knowwhutimean? -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 20:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36e0a6a2edade5329966c9@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #729387 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q562u2$1a0a$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... ยค ยค On 2/27/2019 1:33 AM, Checkmate wrote: ยค > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ยค > Checkmate! In article <q55874$1eob$1@gioia.aioe.org>, ยค > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... ยค >>On 2/27/2019 12:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: ยค >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ยค >>> Checkmate! In article <q5506i$cl7$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 ยค >>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ยค >>>> On 2/26/2019 11:32 AM, stinky puddles piddled: ยค >>>>> There is no scientific proof that the climate change that is ยค >>>>> occurring has anything to do with human activity.<SPANK> ยค >>>> ยค >>>> https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm ยค >>>> ยค >>>> When presented with the overwhelming evidence that the planet is ยค >>>> warming, many people react by asking "but how can we be sure that we?re ยค >>>> causing the warming?" It turns out that the observed global warming has ยค >>>> a distinct human fingerprint on it. ยค >>> ยค >>> This alleged "warming" is minimal at best, if you look at how climate has ยค >>> varied historically... a method that's flawed to begin with, since most ยค >>> climate history >~100 years old is extrapolated information, and ยค >>> inherently prone to intentional or even unintentional bias by the ยค >>> extrapolators. At any rate, the possibility that we can "change" things ยค >>> in any significant manner is highly unlikely, given our current ยค >>> population's requirements to survive in a society that wouldn't even ยค >>> exist as it does today, without fossil fuels. ยค >> ยค >> Not extrapolated. Proxy data. Gasses in ice cores. Pollen. ยค >> Distribution of plant and animal species. Isotope ratios. Lakes and ยค >> rivers buried under sand. Fossil ketchup fries. Stuff like that.. ยค > ยค > It's still extrapolated, IMO. How you gonna mass-spectrometerize the ยค > Tiny Bubbles inside an ice core without any contamination from the ยค > atmosphere, the ice, the extraction method or devices, and wishful ยค > thinking, when atmospheric CO2 is only around 400 PPM to begin with? ยค ยค One uses multiple scientific methods and accounts for uncertainty in ยค multiple ways. ยค ยค As far as sensitivity is concerned, you can convict a black guy based on ยค a 0.1 ppb pee test that proves he done drank some water out the faucet ยค what had 10 ppb cocaine in it from out the city water supply from out ยค the river which is a parole violation. White people aren't guilty of ยค that because they drink Fiji water, or maybe Italian fizzy volcano ยค water. Knowwhutimean? <Major eyeroll> Here's a fun article from The Daily Caller: In a rather testy exchange during a House hearing, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher tore into Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy for not knowing what percentage of the atmosphere was made up of carbon dioxide. "What percentage of the atmosphere is CO2?" the California Republican asked during a Thursday hearing. "I don't have that calculation for you, sir," McCarthy replied. "I don't make those guesses, sir." "You're head of the EPA and you did not know," Rohrabacher shot back in astonishment, "and now you are basing policies that impact dramatically on the American people and you didn't know what the content of CO2 in the atmosphere was" the justification for the very policies you're talking about." "If you're asking me how much CO2 is in the atmosphere, not a percentage but how much, we have just reached levels of 400 parts per million," McCarthy said, looking slightly annoyed with the lawmaker's response. "I think I was very clear on what I was asking," Rohrabacher retorted. "I think it was very clear you didn't know." Rohrabacher said carbon dioxide only makes up "one-half of one-tenth of one percent of the atmosphere," adding that mankind only contributed to about 10 percent of the total amount of CO2. "And you believe that this minimal, tiny element, and by the way only ten percent of that from what I understand is actually man-made" will have an impact on the weather to the point it that it will actually impact people's health," Rohrabacher said, before running out of time during the hearing. The Earth's atmosphere is 78 percent nitrogen, 21 percent oxygen and 1 percent other gases, including about 0.04 percent carbon dioxide. And yes, Earth's CO2 concentration stood at 400 parts per million in May 2015. Earth's CO2 levels have been increasing in recent decades due to human activities and also natural factors, and some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans. Scientists, however, tend to argue that even though humans only contribute a tiny amount of CO2 into the atmosphere, it can't all be absorbed by natural cycles. This is not the first time a Republican lawmaker has tried to trip up McCarthy for not knowing some specifics about global warming. In March, Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions criticized McCarthy for not knowing if predictions about extreme weather were right or wrong. "This is a stunning development, that the head of the Environmental Protection Agency - who should know more than anybody else in the world, who is imposing hundreds of billions of dollars in cost to prevent this climate temperature increase - doesn't know whether their projections have been right or wrong," Sessions said after McCarthy said she didn't know the specifics about hurricane data. *********************************************************************** Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." So 4% of 0.04% = doodley squat. That's hardly enough for that little Congressgirl to get her thong in a bunch over. -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2019 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-28 00:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q57qaj$11ca$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729544 |
On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: > So 4% of 0.04% = doodley squat. That's hardly enough for that little > Congressgirl to get her thong in a bunch over. That's where you're rong. It's 3% of the pie chart of the entire earth which can hardly be measured: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAaDVOd2sRQ -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-27 23:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36e12913258f83629966dc@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #729551 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q57qaj$11ca$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... ยค ยค On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: ยค > So 4% of 0.04% = doodley squat. That's hardly enough for that little ยค > Congressgirl to get her thong in a bunch over. ยค ยค That's where you're rong. It's 3% of the pie chart of the entire earth ยค which can hardly be measured: ยค ยค https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAaDVOd2sRQ It's a <airquotes> "NATCHERAL thing" </airquotes>. (What a moron!) -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2019 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-28 10:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q58tnt$49l$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729577 |
On 2/28/2019 2:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q57qaj$11ca$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >> On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> So 4% of 0.04% = doodley squat. That's hardly enough for that little >>> Congressgirl to get her thong in a bunch over. >> >> That's where you're rong. It's 3% of the pie chart of the entire earth >> which can hardly be measured: >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAaDVOd2sRQ > > It's a <airquotes> "NATCHERAL thing" </airquotes>. > (What a moron!) Great infomercial for a natural nutritional supplement though. Little known fact: The atmosphere on Mars is 95.32% CO2 and there are no people there to create it. Also, the climate there is exactly the same as here (very comfortable - take that, you anti-climate people). That's why we need Space Force to conquer Mars and open it to colonization so we can grow food for America (and sell it to China and Russia for a fantastic markup!). -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-28 08:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36e1a66e5c347e059966e4@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #729602 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q58tnt$49l$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... ยค ยค On 2/28/2019 2:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: ยค > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ยค > Checkmate! In article <q57qaj$11ca$1@gioia.aioe.org>, ยค > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... ยค >> On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: ยค >>> So 4% of 0.04% = doodley squat. That's hardly enough for that little ยค >>> Congressgirl to get her thong in a bunch over. ยค >> ยค >> That's where you're rong. It's 3% of the pie chart of the entire earth ยค >> which can hardly be measured: ยค >> ยค >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAaDVOd2sRQ ยค > ยค > It's a <airquotes> "NATCHERAL thing" </airquotes>. ยค > (What a moron!) ยค ยค Great infomercial for a natural nutritional supplement though. Little ยค known fact: The atmosphere on Mars is 95.32% CO2 and there are no people ยค there to create it. Also, the climate there is exactly the same as here ยค (very comfortable - take that, you anti-climate people). That's why we ยค need Space Force to conquer Mars and open it to colonization so we can ยค grow food for America (and sell it to China and Russia for a fantastic ยค markup!). Just add water and stir... -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2019 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 06:46 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729544 |
On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent > of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of what it was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 01:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36e296fc330a66ea996715@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #729712 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ยค ยค On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: ยค > Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent ยค > of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." ยค ยค Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't prove the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. 0.04% is doodley squat. Even if you could prove it, you couldn't dial it back down to pre-industrial age levels anyway, and I'm pretty sure the climate today is nearly the same as it was back then. There are numerous cyclic activities involving sun spots, volcanism, rock erosion, orbits, and the Earth's tilt and wobble that all have the potential to alter climate. You have far too many things that you irrationally get all riled up over. As I've pointed out before, there are natural mechanisms in place that keep CO2 levels relatively stable. ยค That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of what it ยค was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans. Bullshit. -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2019 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 11:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jcni7etco6a3iub5sblno0rcuobk2urql1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #729744 |
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 01:10:58 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >Checkmate! In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01>@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >ยค On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: >ยค > Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent >ยค > of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." >ยค >ยค Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. > >That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't prove >the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. 0.04% is >doodley squat. Even if you could prove it, you couldn't dial it back >down to pre-industrial age levels anyway, and I'm pretty sure the climate >today is nearly the same as it was back then. > >There are numerous cyclic activities involving sun spots, volcanism, rock >erosion, orbits, and the Earth's tilt and wobble that all have the >potential to alter climate. You have far too many things that you >irrationally get all riled up over. As I've pointed out before, there >are natural mechanisms in place that keep CO2 levels relatively stable. > >ยค That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of what it >ยค was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans. > >Bullshit. Indeed. And, the warmingtards STILL ignore the fact that ice core samples prove the FIRST the temperature rise FOLLOWED by atmospheric CO2 levels rising. These idiot warmingtards continue to claim that first the atmospheric levels of CO2 rise followed by a temperature rise. They have it just backwards yet they persist in their folly. So very stupid of them. -- Everybรธdy here likes Yรธurs Truly, Gregรธry Hall - Bรธmbastic Lรธudmรธuth รธf the Sรธuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 09:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gdt5m7F5gq0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #729768 |
On 3/1/19 9:30 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 01:10:58 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01>@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> ยค On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> ยค > Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent >> ยค > of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." >> ยค >> ยค Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. >> >> That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't prove >> the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. 0.04% is >> doodley squat. Even if you could prove it, you couldn't dial it back >> down to pre-industrial age levels anyway, and I'm pretty sure the climate >> today is nearly the same as it was back then. >> >> There are numerous cyclic activities involving sun spots, volcanism, rock >> erosion, orbits, and the Earth's tilt and wobble that all have the >> potential to alter climate. You have far too many things that you >> irrationally get all riled up over. As I've pointed out before, there >> are natural mechanisms in place that keep CO2 levels relatively stable. >> >> ยค That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of what it >> ยค was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans. >> >> Bullshit. > > Indeed. And, the warmingtards STILL ignore the fact > that ice core samples prove the FIRST the temperature > rise FOLLOWED by atmospheric CO2 levels rising. > > These idiot warmingtards continue to claim that first > the atmospheric levels of CO2 rise followed by a > temperature rise. They have it just backwards yet > they persist in their folly. > > So very stupid of them. > Wow... you know more than all the world's scientists but have never published. What an honor to be able to speak to you! Really... how can you even take yourself seriously. No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these conclusions: โข "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia". โข "Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide have increased to levels unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years". โข Human influence on the climate system is clear. It is extremely likely (95-100% probability) that human influence was the dominant cause of global warming between 1951-2010. โข "Increasing magnitudes of [global] warming increase the likelihood of severe, pervasive, and irreversible impacts" โข "A first step towards adaptation to future climate change is reducing vulnerability and exposure to present climate variability" โข "The overall risks of climate change impacts can be reduced by limiting the rate and magnitude of climate change" โข Without new policies to mitigate climate change, projections suggest an increase in global mean temperature in 2100 of 3.7 to 4.8 ยฐC, relative to pre-industrial levels (median values; the range is 2.5 to 7.8 ยฐC including climate uncertainty). โข The current trajectory of global greenhouse gas emissions is not consistent with limiting global warming to below 1.5 or 2 ยฐC, relative to pre-industrial levels. Pledges made as part of the Cancรบn Agreements are broadly consistent with cost-effective scenarios that give a "likely" chance (66-100% probability) of limiting global warming (in 2100) to below 3 ยฐC, relative to pre-industrial levels. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 12:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5bp6a$13p3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729768 |
On 3/1/2019 11:30 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 01:10:58 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01>@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> ยค On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> ยค > Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent >> ยค > of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." >> ยค >> ยค Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. >> >> That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't prove >> the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. 0.04% is >> doodley squat. Even if you could prove it, you couldn't dial it back >> down to pre-industrial age levels anyway, and I'm pretty sure the climate >> today is nearly the same as it was back then. >> >> There are numerous cyclic activities involving sun spots, volcanism, rock >> erosion, orbits, and the Earth's tilt and wobble that all have the >> potential to alter climate. You have far too many things that you >> irrationally get all riled up over. As I've pointed out before, there >> are natural mechanisms in place that keep CO2 levels relatively stable. >> >> ยค That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of what it >> ยค was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans. >> >> Bullshit. > > Indeed. And, the warmingtards STILL ignore the fact > that ice core samples prove the FIRST the temperature > rise FOLLOWED by atmospheric CO2 levels rising. > > These idiot warmingtards continue to claim that first > the atmospheric levels of CO2 rise followed by a > temperature rise. They have it just backwards yet > they persist in their folly. > > So very stupid of them. Stupid oceans wouldn't let the CO2 rise up until they got warm. Rat bastard oceans. F**k the oceans. Trump should sign an executive order outlawing oceans because they flood golf courses, too, and reduce property values which makes it difficult to get multi-billion dollar loans to buy National Football teams to honor the troops, and the flag, and The President, who represents America, without inflating (hugely), which is illegal, and has consequences for tax liability deflating. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 10:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gdt9s6F6d9rU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #729771 |
On 3/1/19 10:12 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 3/1/2019 11:30 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 01:10:58 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate!ย In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> kkensington01>@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> ยค On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> ยค > Did you catch this part?ย "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 >>> percent >>> ยค > of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." >>> ยค >>> ยค Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. >>> >>> That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't prove >>> the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound.ย 0.04% is >>> doodley squat.ย Even if you could prove it, you couldn't dial it back >>> down to pre-industrial age levels anyway, and I'm pretty sure the >>> climate >>> today is nearly the same as it was back then. >>> >>> There are numerous cyclic activities involving sun spots, volcanism, >>> rock >>> erosion, orbits, and the Earth's tilt and wobble that all have the >>> potential to alter climate.ย You have far too many things that you >>> irrationally get all riled up over.ย As I've pointed out before, there >>> are natural mechanisms in place that keep CO2 levels relatively stable. >>> >>> ยค That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of >>> what it >>> ยค was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans. >>> >>> Bullshit. >> >> Indeed. And, the warmingtards STILL ignore the fact >> that ice core samples prove the FIRST the temperature >> rise FOLLOWED by atmospheric CO2 levels rising. >> >> These idiot warmingtards continue to claim that first >> the atmospheric levels of CO2 rise followed by a >> temperature rise. They have it just backwards yet >> they persist in their folly. >> >> So very stupid of them. > > Stupid oceans wouldn't let the CO2 rise up until they got warm. Not sure what studies you even mean, but we know the oceans are getting warmer and more acidic. > Rat > bastard oceans.ย F**k the oceans.ย Trump should sign an executive order > outlawing oceans because they flood golf courses, too, and reduce > property values which makes it difficult to get multi-billion dollar > loans to buy National Football teams to honor the troops, and the flag, > and The President, who represents America, without inflating (hugely), > which is illegal, and has consequences for tax liability deflating. What we know, and conservatives tend to deny, is no scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these conclusions: โข "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia". โข "Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide have increased to levels unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years". โข Human influence on the climate system is clear. It is extremely likely (95-100% probability) that human influence was the dominant cause of global warming between 1951-2010. โข "Increasing magnitudes of [global] warming increase the likelihood of severe, pervasive, and irreversible impacts" โข "A first step towards adaptation to future climate change is reducing vulnerability and exposure to present climate variability" โข "The overall risks of climate change impacts can be reduced by limiting the rate and magnitude of climate change" โข Without new policies to mitigate climate change, projections suggest an increase in global mean temperature in 2100 of 3.7 to 4.8 ยฐC, relative to pre-industrial levels (median values; the range is 2.5 to 7.8 ยฐC including climate uncertainty). โข The current trajectory of global greenhouse gas emissions is not consistent with limiting global warming to below 1.5 or 2 ยฐC, relative to pre-industrial levels. Pledges made as part of the Cancรบn Agreements are broadly consistent with cost-effective scenarios that give a "likely" chance (66-100% probability) of limiting global warming (in 2100) to below 3 ยฐC, relative to pre-industrial levels. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 12:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36e3381b323cb72899673b@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #729771 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <q5bp6a$13p3$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
ยค
ยค On 3/1/2019 11:30 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
ยค > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 01:10:58 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
ยค >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
ยค >> Checkmate! In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01>@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
ยค >> ยค On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote:
ยค >> ยค > Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent
ยค >> ยค > of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans."
ยค >> ยค
ยค >> ยค Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now.
ยค >>
ยค >> That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't prove
ยค >> the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. 0.04% is
ยค >> doodley squat. Even if you could prove it, you couldn't dial it back
ยค >> down to pre-industrial age levels anyway, and I'm pretty sure the climate
ยค >> today is nearly the same as it was back then.
ยค >>
ยค >> There are numerous cyclic activities involving sun spots, volcanism, rock
ยค >> erosion, orbits, and the Earth's tilt and wobble that all have the
ยค >> potential to alter climate. You have far too many things that you
ยค >> irrationally get all riled up over. As I've pointed out before, there
ยค >> are natural mechanisms in place that keep CO2 levels relatively stable.
ยค >>
ยค >> ยค That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of what it
ยค >> ยค was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans.
ยค >>
ยค >> Bullshit.
ยค >
ยค > Indeed. And, the warmingtards STILL ignore the fact
ยค > that ice core samples prove the FIRST the temperature
ยค > rise FOLLOWED by atmospheric CO2 levels rising.
ยค >
ยค > These idiot warmingtards continue to claim that first
ยค > the atmospheric levels of CO2 rise followed by a
ยค > temperature rise. They have it just backwards yet
ยค > they persist in their folly.
ยค >
ยค > So very stupid of them.
ยค
ยค Stupid oceans wouldn't let the CO2 rise up until they got warm. Rat
ยค bastard oceans. F**k the oceans. Trump should sign an executive order
ยค outlawing oceans because they flood golf courses, too, and reduce
ยค property values which makes it difficult to get multi-billion dollar
ยค loans to buy National Football teams to honor the troops, and the flag,
ยค and The President, who represents America, without inflating (hugely),
ยค which is illegal, and has consequences for tax liability deflating.
*burp-fart*
--
Checkmate ยฎ
Copyright ยฉ 2019
all rights reserved
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller
In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 16:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5c837$19m3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729809 |
On 3/1/2019 3:38 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q5bp6a$13p3$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >> On 3/1/2019 11:30 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 01:10:58 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01>@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>> On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent >>>>>> of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." >>>>> >>>>> Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. >>>> >>>> That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't prove >>>> the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. 0.04% is >>>> doodley squat. Even if you could prove it, you couldn't dial it back >>>> down to pre-industrial age levels anyway, and I'm pretty sure the climate >>>> today is nearly the same as it was back then. >>>> >>>> There are numerous cyclic activities involving sun spots, volcanism, rock >>>> erosion, orbits, and the Earth's tilt and wobble that all have the >>>> potential to alter climate. You have far too many things that you >>>> irrationally get all riled up over. As I've pointed out before, there >>>> are natural mechanisms in place that keep CO2 levels relatively stable. >>>> >>>>> That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of what it >>>>> was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans. >>>> >>>> Bullshit. >>> >>> Indeed. And, the warmingtards STILL ignore the fact >>> that ice core samples prove the FIRST the temperature >>> rise FOLLOWED by atmospheric CO2 levels rising. >>> >>> These idiot warmingtards continue to claim that first >>> the atmospheric levels of CO2 rise followed by a >>> temperature rise. They have it just backwards yet >>> they persist in their folly. >>> >>> So very stupid of them. >> >> Stupid oceans wouldn't let the CO2 rise up until they got warm. Rat >> bastard oceans. F**k the oceans. Trump should sign an executive order >> outlawing oceans because they flood golf courses, too, and reduce >> property values which makes it difficult to get multi-billion dollar >> loans to buy National Football teams to honor the troops, and the flag, >> and The President, who represents America, without inflating (hugely), >> which is illegal, and has consequences for tax liability deflating. > > *burp-fart* It's all in the molar attenuation coefficient, re-emission and collision energy transfer, and heat capacity due to the specific eigenmodes available to the system. Remember, chill the diet coke before you pop it open. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web