Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #726976 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-13 05:57 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-02-13 08:44 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 225 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 05:57 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-12 21:05 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 13:48 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:01 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 09:05 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 11:24 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 10:58 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 12:03 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:27 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:11 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:14 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:07 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 15:27 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:44 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 10:57 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 13:20 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 12:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 12:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 14:40 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 08:07 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Snit Once Again Publicy Worships AOC and Her Herd Of Unicorns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 11:48 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 10:18 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:24 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 15:41 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:45 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 17:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 13:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 12:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 05:57 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 06:11 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 18:07 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 20:45 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp - 2019-02-13 13:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 16:14 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:50 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:29 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-14 03:54 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 21:04 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:34 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 08:00 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:20 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:02 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 15:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:59 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:09 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:59 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:16 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:14 -0700
Re: β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-14 15:16 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 06:08 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:21 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 23:16 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:34 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 02:51 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 08:28 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 09:51 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 11:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 11:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 15:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 16:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:38 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:44 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:54 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:56 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 19:46 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 19:54 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:45 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:48 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 19:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:41 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:55 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 20:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 20:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 20:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 20:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 20:55 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:02 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:11 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:01 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 17:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:42 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:17 -0700
Snit Keeps crying to himself Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 17:23 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:16 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 17:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:42 -0700
Poor Snit complains to himself. Again. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:43 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 13:44 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 11:48 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:27 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-15 07:24 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-15 05:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 15:58 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 16:20 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:30 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 18:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 18:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:29 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:44 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:58 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 20:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:04 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 20:29 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 09:39 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-14 10:39 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 05:48 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:28 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 07:47 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 08:44 -0700
Page 11 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 19:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvv9bf.rct.17.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727211 |
On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather >>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here >>>>>>>>>>> yet. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that >>>>>>>>>> it will for >>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of >>>>>>>>> the word >>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise >>>>>>>>>> in your >>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY >>>>>>>>>> close. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different >>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS >>>>>>>>>> possible to have >>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence >>>>>>>>>> in them, >>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in >>>>>>>>> which case >>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is >>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is >>>>>>>>>>> all still >>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago >>>>>>>>>>> that we would >>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators >>>>>>>>>>> yet he was >>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical >>>>>>>>>>> panic over >>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the >>>>>>>>>> table in >>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her >>>>>>>>>> ideas are >>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the >>>>>>>>> difference >>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't going >>>>>>>> nearly fast enough so AOC has some great Socialist ideas to end >>>>>>>> it all much sooner. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you cannot back >>>>>>> but just want to get attention. Odd that you would do that... or, >>>>>>> really, just pathetic. What makes you desire attention so badly >>>>>>> you would spew such unsupportable nonsense? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure killing off >>>>>>>> hundreds of million isn the billions neede to empty the planet, >>>>>>>> but hey you have to start somewhere. I'm sure AOC has a plan. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the Republicans have >>>>>>> nothing to offer so you just lash out with lies. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>> >>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>> >>>> who's bill >>> >>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>> >> >> i liked him > > I never met him. > you should try while there's still time , call him on the phone he's in the book , he won't mind
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 19:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gck278F2vj2U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727212 |
On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here >>>>>>>>>>>> yet. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that >>>>>>>>>>> it will for >>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of >>>>>>>>>> the word >>>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise >>>>>>>>>>> in your >>>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY >>>>>>>>>>> close. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different >>>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS >>>>>>>>>>> possible to have >>>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence >>>>>>>>>>> in them, >>>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and >>>>>>>>>>> calculations. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in >>>>>>>>>> which case >>>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is >>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is >>>>>>>>>>>> all still >>>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago >>>>>>>>>>>> that we would >>>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators >>>>>>>>>>>> yet he was >>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical >>>>>>>>>>>> panic over >>>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the >>>>>>>>>>> table in >>>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her >>>>>>>>>>> ideas are >>>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the >>>>>>>>>> difference >>>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't going >>>>>>>>> nearly fast enough so AOC has some great Socialist ideas to end >>>>>>>>> it all much sooner. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you cannot back >>>>>>>> but just want to get attention. Odd that you would do that... >>>>>>>> or, really, just pathetic. What makes you desire attention so >>>>>>>> badly you would spew such unsupportable nonsense? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure killing off >>>>>>>>> hundreds of million isn the billions neede to empty the planet, >>>>>>>>> but hey you have to start somewhere. I'm sure AOC has a plan. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the Republicans have >>>>>>>> nothing to offer so you just lash out with lies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>>> >>>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>>> >>>>> who's bill >>>> >>>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>>> >>> >>> i liked him >> >> I never met him. >> > > you should try while there's still time , > call him on the phone he's in the book , > he won't mind Went to voice mail. Will try again later. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 19:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvv9ln.rct.17.9@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727214 |
On 2019-02-13 7:31 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, % wrote: >> On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that >>>>>>>>>>>> it will for >>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition >>>>>>>>>>> of the word >>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise >>>>>>>>>>>> in your >>>>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be >>>>>>>>>>>> VERY close. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different >>>>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS >>>>>>>>>>>> possible to have >>>>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of >>>>>>>>>>>> confidence in them, >>>>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and >>>>>>>>>>>> calculations. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in >>>>>>>>>>> which case >>>>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is >>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it >>>>>>>>>>>>> is all still >>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago >>>>>>>>>>>>> that we would >>>>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators >>>>>>>>>>>>> yet he was >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a >>>>>>>>>>>>> hysterical panic over >>>>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the >>>>>>>>>>>> table in >>>>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her >>>>>>>>>>>> ideas are >>>>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the >>>>>>>>>>> difference >>>>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't going >>>>>>>>>> nearly fast enough so AOC has some great Socialist ideas to >>>>>>>>>> end it all much sooner. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you cannot back >>>>>>>>> but just want to get attention. Odd that you would do that... >>>>>>>>> or, really, just pathetic. What makes you desire attention so >>>>>>>>> badly you would spew such unsupportable nonsense? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure killing off >>>>>>>>>> hundreds of million isn the billions neede to empty the >>>>>>>>>> planet, but hey you have to start somewhere. I'm sure AOC has >>>>>>>>>> a plan. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the Republicans have >>>>>>>>> nothing to offer so you just lash out with lies. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>>>> >>>>>> who's bill >>>>> >>>>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>>>> >>>> >>>> i liked him >>> >>> I never met him. >>> >> >> you should try while there's still time , >> call him on the phone he's in the book , >> he won't mind > > Went to voice mail. Will try again later. > email him he's likely online now
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 19:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gck2g6F2vj2U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727217 |
On 2/13/19 7:35 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-02-13 7:31 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time >>>>>>>>>>>>> that it will for >>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition >>>>>>>>>>>> of the word >>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will >>>>>>>>>>>>> rise in your >>>>>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be >>>>>>>>>>>>> VERY close. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different >>>>>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to have >>>>>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of >>>>>>>>>>>>> confidence in them, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and >>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in >>>>>>>>>>>> which case >>>>>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, >>>>>>>>>>>> low. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is all still >>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago that we would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators >>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hysterical panic over >>>>>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> table in >>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do >>>>>>>>>>>>> her ideas are >>>>>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the >>>>>>>>>>>> difference >>>>>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't going >>>>>>>>>>> nearly fast enough so AOC has some great Socialist ideas to >>>>>>>>>>> end it all much sooner. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you cannot back >>>>>>>>>> but just want to get attention. Odd that you would do that... >>>>>>>>>> or, really, just pathetic. What makes you desire attention so >>>>>>>>>> badly you would spew such unsupportable nonsense? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure killing off >>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of million isn the billions neede to empty the >>>>>>>>>>> planet, but hey you have to start somewhere. I'm sure AOC has >>>>>>>>>>> a plan. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the Republicans have >>>>>>>>>> nothing to offer so you just lash out with lies. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> who's bill >>>>>> >>>>>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> i liked him >>>> >>>> I never met him. >>>> >>> >>> you should try while there's still time , >>> call him on the phone he's in the book , >>> he won't mind >> >> Went to voice mail. Will try again later. >> > > email him he's likely online now He now has a firewall around his basement. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 19:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvva5q.sjm.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727218 |
On 2019-02-13 7:35 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 2/13/19 7:35 PM, % wrote: >> On 2019-02-13 7:31 p.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>> On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weather may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it will for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition >>>>>>>>>>>>> of the word >>>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rise in your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> VERY close. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two >>>>>>>>>>>>> different things. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> confidence in them, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in >>>>>>>>>>>>> which case >>>>>>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, >>>>>>>>>>>>> low. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is all still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago that we would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculators yet he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hysterical panic over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> table in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do >>>>>>>>>>>>>> her ideas are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the >>>>>>>>>>>>> difference >>>>>>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't going >>>>>>>>>>>> nearly fast enough so AOC has some great Socialist ideas to >>>>>>>>>>>> end it all much sooner. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you cannot >>>>>>>>>>> back but just want to get attention. Odd that you would do >>>>>>>>>>> that... or, really, just pathetic. What makes you desire >>>>>>>>>>> attention so badly you would spew such unsupportable nonsense? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure killing off >>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of million isn the billions neede to empty the >>>>>>>>>>>> planet, but hey you have to start somewhere. I'm sure AOC >>>>>>>>>>>> has a plan. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the Republicans >>>>>>>>>>> have nothing to offer so you just lash out with lies. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> who's bill >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> i liked him >>>>> >>>>> I never met him. >>>>> >>>> >>>> you should try while there's still time , >>>> call him on the phone he's in the book , >>>> he won't mind >>> >>> Went to voice mail. Will try again later. >>> >> >> email him he's likely online now > > He now has a firewall around his basement. > don't you know how to get around those , just change your name
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 19:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gck30pF36kbU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727221 |
On 2/13/19 7:43 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-02-13 7:35 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 2/13/19 7:35 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-02-13 7:31 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weather may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it will for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of the word >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rise in your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VERY close. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two >>>>>>>>>>>>>> different things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confidence in them, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in which case >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> very, low. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is all still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago that we would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculators yet he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hysterical panic over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the table in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her ideas are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> difference >>>>>>>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> going nearly fast enough so AOC has some great Socialist >>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas to end it all much sooner. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>> back but just want to get attention. Odd that you would do >>>>>>>>>>>> that... or, really, just pathetic. What makes you desire >>>>>>>>>>>> attention so badly you would spew such unsupportable nonsense? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure killing off >>>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of million isn the billions neede to empty the >>>>>>>>>>>>> planet, but hey you have to start somewhere. I'm sure AOC >>>>>>>>>>>>> has a plan. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the Republicans >>>>>>>>>>>> have nothing to offer so you just lash out with lies. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>>>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>>>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> who's bill >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i liked him >>>>>> >>>>>> I never met him. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> you should try while there's still time , >>>>> call him on the phone he's in the book , >>>>> he won't mind >>>> >>>> Went to voice mail. Will try again later. >>>> >>> >>> email him he's likely online now >> >> He now has a firewall around his basement. >> > > don't you know how to get around those , just change your name I do not use socks. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 19:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvvahk.sjm.19.9@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727222 |
On 2019-02-13 7:44 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 2/13/19 7:43 PM, % wrote: >> On 2019-02-13 7:35 p.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 7:35 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2019-02-13 7:31 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>> On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weather may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it will for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of the word >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rise in your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VERY close. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confidence in them, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in which case >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very, low. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is all still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago that we would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculators yet he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hysterical panic over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the table in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her ideas are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the difference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> going nearly fast enough so AOC has some great Socialist >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas to end it all much sooner. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>> back but just want to get attention. Odd that you would do >>>>>>>>>>>>> that... or, really, just pathetic. What makes you desire >>>>>>>>>>>>> attention so badly you would spew such unsupportable nonsense? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure killing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> off hundreds of million isn the billions neede to empty >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the planet, but hey you have to start somewhere. I'm sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>> AOC has a plan. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the Republicans >>>>>>>>>>>>> have nothing to offer so you just lash out with lies. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>>>>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>>>>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> who's bill >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i liked him >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I never met him. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> you should try while there's still time , >>>>>> call him on the phone he's in the book , >>>>>> he won't mind >>>>> >>>>> Went to voice mail. Will try again later. >>>>> >>>> >>>> email him he's likely online now >>> >>> He now has a firewall around his basement. >>> >> >> don't you know how to get around those , just change your name > > I do not use socks. > that stinks
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 19:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gck3heF3afhU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727228 |
On 2/13/19 7:49 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-02-13 7:44 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 2/13/19 7:43 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-02-13 7:35 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 7:35 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:31 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weather may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it will for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of the word >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rise in your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be VERY close. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confidence in them, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in which case >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very, low. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is all still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago that we would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculators yet he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hysterical panic over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the table in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do her ideas are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the difference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going nearly fast enough so AOC has some great Socialist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas to end it all much sooner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>> back but just want to get attention. Odd that you would do >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that... or, really, just pathetic. What makes you desire >>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention so badly you would spew such unsupportable >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure killing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off hundreds of million isn the billions neede to empty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the planet, but hey you have to start somewhere. I'm sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AOC has a plan. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the Republicans >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have nothing to offer so you just lash out with lies. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>>>>>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>>>>>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> who's bill >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> i liked him >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I never met him. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you should try while there's still time , >>>>>>> call him on the phone he's in the book , >>>>>>> he won't mind >>>>>> >>>>>> Went to voice mail. Will try again later. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> email him he's likely online now >>>> >>>> He now has a firewall around his basement. >>>> >>> >>> don't you know how to get around those , just change your name >> >> I do not use socks. >> > > that stinks I have not yet been defeeted. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 19:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvvb2d.alo.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727230 |
On 2019-02-13 7:53 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 2/13/19 7:49 PM, % wrote: >> On 2019-02-13 7:44 p.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 7:43 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2019-02-13 7:35 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>> On 2/13/19 7:35 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:31 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weather may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time that it will for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of the word >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will rise in your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be VERY close. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confidence in them, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> die, in which case >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very, low. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is all still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago that we would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculators yet he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hysterical panic over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the table in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do her ideas are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the difference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going nearly fast enough so AOC has some great Socialist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas to end it all much sooner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back but just want to get attention. Odd that you would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do that... or, really, just pathetic. What makes you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire attention so badly you would spew such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsupportable nonsense? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure killing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off hundreds of million isn the billions neede to empty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the planet, but hey you have to start somewhere. I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure AOC has a plan. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the Republicans >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have nothing to offer so you just lash out with lies. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>>>>>>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> who's bill >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> i liked him >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I never met him. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> you should try while there's still time , >>>>>>>> call him on the phone he's in the book , >>>>>>>> he won't mind >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Went to voice mail. Will try again later. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> email him he's likely online now >>>>> >>>>> He now has a firewall around his basement. >>>>> >>>> >>>> don't you know how to get around those , just change your name >>> >>> I do not use socks. >>> >> >> that stinks > > I have not yet been defeeted. > it's cheating using a toe truck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 20:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gck420F3cu1U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727235 |
On 2/13/19 7:58 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-02-13 7:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 2/13/19 7:49 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-02-13 7:44 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 7:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:35 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:35 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:31 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weather may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time that it will for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of the word >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will rise in your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be VERY close. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IS possible to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confidence in them, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> die, in which case >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very, low. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is all still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago that we would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculators yet he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hysterical panic over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the table in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do her ideas are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the difference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going nearly fast enough so AOC has some great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Socialist ideas to end it all much sooner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot back but just want to get attention. Odd that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would do that... or, really, just pathetic. What makes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you desire attention so badly you would spew such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsupportable nonsense? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure killing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off hundreds of million isn the billions neede to empty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the planet, but hey you have to start somewhere. I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure AOC has a plan. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans have nothing to offer so you just lash out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with lies. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> who's bill >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> i liked him >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I never met him. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> you should try while there's still time , >>>>>>>>> call him on the phone he's in the book , >>>>>>>>> he won't mind >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Went to voice mail. Will try again later. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> email him he's likely online now >>>>>> >>>>>> He now has a firewall around his basement. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> don't you know how to get around those , just change your name >>>> >>>> I do not use socks. >>>> >>> >>> that stinks >> >> I have not yet been defeeted. >> > > it's cheating using a toe truck I do not cheat, I just use a lot of sole. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 20:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvvbd8.rtb.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727236 |
On 2019-02-13 8:02 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 2/13/19 7:58 PM, % wrote: >> On 2019-02-13 7:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 7:49 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2019-02-13 7:44 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>> On 2/13/19 7:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:35 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:35 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:31 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weather may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time that it will for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of the word >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will rise in your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be VERY close. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IS possible to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confidence in them, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> die, in which case >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very, low. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is all still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago that we would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculators yet he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hysterical panic over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the table in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you do her ideas are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand the difference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going nearly fast enough so AOC has some great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Socialist ideas to end it all much sooner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot back but just want to get attention. Odd that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would do that... or, really, just pathetic. What >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes you desire attention so badly you would spew such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsupportable nonsense? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> killing off hundreds of million isn the billions neede >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to empty the planet, but hey you have to start >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere. I'm sure AOC has a plan. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans have nothing to offer so you just lash out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with lies. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> who's bill >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> i liked him >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I never met him. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> you should try while there's still time , >>>>>>>>>> call him on the phone he's in the book , >>>>>>>>>> he won't mind >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Went to voice mail. Will try again later. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> email him he's likely online now >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He now has a firewall around his basement. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> don't you know how to get around those , just change your name >>>>> >>>>> I do not use socks. >>>>> >>>> >>>> that stinks >>> >>> I have not yet been defeeted. >>> >> >> it's cheating using a toe truck > > I do not cheat, I just use a lot of sole. > what a heel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gckb8qF4rd1U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727238 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2019-02-13 8:02 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 2/13/19 7:58 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-02-13 7:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 7:49 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:44 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:35 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:35 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:31 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 7:25 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 7:13 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:53 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:47 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:43 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-02-13 6:36 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 6:30 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weather may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time that it will for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of the word >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will rise in your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be VERY close. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IS possible to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confidence in them, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> die, in which case >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very, low. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is irrelevant that some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is all still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago that we would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculators yet he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hysterical panic over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the table in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you do her ideas are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand the difference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree. Good to see you have figured this out, too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I mean the destruction of all human civilization isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going nearly fast enough so AOC has some great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Socialist ideas to end it all much sooner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What an odd thing to say... something you know you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot back but just want to get attention. Odd that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would do that... or, really, just pathetic. What >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes you desire attention so badly you would spew such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsupportable nonsense? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remember how great collectivism utopia is? Sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> killing off hundreds of million isn the billions neede >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to empty the planet, but hey you have to start >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere. I'm sure AOC has a plan. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once again you prove how you know you and the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans have nothing to offer so you just lash out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with lies. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amazing how often you do that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i just read the subject line , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i don't live in a city , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so i guess i don't get the change >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keep your bills. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who's bill >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The person Hillary used to get to power. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> i liked him >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I never met him. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> you should try while there's still time , >>>>>>>>>>> call him on the phone he's in the book , >>>>>>>>>>> he won't mind >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Went to voice mail. Will try again later. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> email him he's likely online now >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He now has a firewall around his basement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> don't you know how to get around those , just change your name >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not use socks. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> that stinks >>>> >>>> I have not yet been defeeted. >>>> >>> >>> it's cheating using a toe truck >> >> I do not cheat, I just use a lot of sole. >> > what a heel > At least I am not high.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 20:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q42jqb$13jl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727198 |
On 2/13/2019 7:30 PM, benj wrote: > On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>> >>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>> >>>>> Do you even know? >>>> >>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>> >>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>> you. >> >> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >> "evidence". >> >> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >> >>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. >> >> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. >> >>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. >> >> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >> >> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case >> there will be no more sun rises. >> >> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >> >> >>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that >>>> some >>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >>>> speculation. >>>> >>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we >>>> would >>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>> >>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>>> wrong. >>>> >>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>> >>>> >>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>> >>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >>> the best on the table. >> Β Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference >> between probability and evidence. >> Β > Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. I mean the destruction of all > human civilization isn't going nearly fast enough so AOC has some great > Socialist ideas to end it all much sooner. Remember how great > collectivism utopia is? Sure killing off hundreds of million isn the > billions neede to empty the planet, but hey you have to start somewhere. > I'm sure AOC has a plan. if AOC is a real leader, she will off herself first, as an example to all leftists. She could tape a paper bag to her big mouth, and huff her own CO2, and help save the planet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 19:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gck2b5F2vj2U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727213 |
On 2/13/19 7:29 PM, Serg Io wrote: > On 2/13/2019 7:30 PM, benj wrote: >> On 2/13/2019 3:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>> >>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>>> >>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>>> you. >>> >>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >>> "evidence". >>> >>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>> >>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. >>> >>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. >>> >>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. >>> >>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>> >>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case >>> there will be no more sun rises. >>> >>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >>> >>> >>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that >>>>> some >>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >>>>> speculation. >>>>> >>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we >>>>> would >>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>> >>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>>>> wrong. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>> >>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >>>> the best on the table. >>> Β Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference >>> between probability and evidence. >>> >> Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. I mean the destruction of all >> human civilization isn't going nearly fast enough so AOC has some great >> Socialist ideas to end it all much sooner. Remember how great >> collectivism utopia is? Sure killing off hundreds of million isn the >> billions neede to empty the planet, but hey you have to start somewhere. >> I'm sure AOC has a plan. > > if AOC is a real leader, she will off herself first, as an example to > all leftists. She could tape a paper bag to her big mouth, and huff her > own CO2, and help save the planet. > Your anger is at yourself -- for having nothing to offer. Look at how you feel the need to lie about her and attack her. It is a typical fear response. And I LOVE it. I love how the right -- and even many on the left -- fear her and how she is openly speaking of the crap in Washington. How she sees homeless people holding lines for lobbyists to go into meetings to discuss the issue of homelessness. She is far from perfect... but she has guts few in Washington do. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 09:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q6va6eljn8976t594vu75ibhn3e90pi08c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #727216 |
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Shit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: <...> >Your anger is at yourself -- for having nothing to offer. Look at how >you feel the need to lie about her and attack her. It is a typical fear >response. <...> Fear? C'mon, Snit, even you can't be THAT stupid. People are LAUGHING at the girl's ignorance and at her oversized mouth that is only good for puking socialist pabulum. -- EverybΓΈdy here likes YΓΈurs Truly, GregΓΈry Hall - BΓΈmbastic LΓΈudmΓΈuth ΓΈf the SΓΈuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 10:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q445l8$6d7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727306 |
On 2/14/2019 8:39 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Shit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > <...> > >> Your anger is at yourself -- for having nothing to offer. Look at how >> you feel the need to lie about her and attack her. It is a typical fear >> response. > > <...> > > Fear? C'mon, Snit, even you can't be THAT stupid. > > People are LAUGHING at the girl's ignorance and > at her oversized mouth that is only good for puking > socialist pabulum. > jesus Snit, you believe that AOC twit ?? put down that pipe! What she said ended any chance that anyone would take her seriously. even California is canceling its high speed train project https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/feb/12/california-high-speed-rail-la-san-francisco-cancelled
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 10:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcln7bFe5soU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727314 |
On 2/14/19 9:39 AM, Serg Io wrote: > On 2/14/2019 8:39 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Shit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >>> Your anger is at yourself -- for having nothing to offer. Look at how >>> you feel the need to lie about her and attack her. It is a typical fear >>> response. >> >> <...> >> >> Fear? C'mon, Snit, even you can't be THAT stupid. >> >> People are LAUGHING at the girl's ignorance and >> at her oversized mouth that is only good for puking >> socialist pabulum. >> > > > jesus Snit, you believe that AOC twit ?? put down that pipe! > > What she said ended any chance that anyone would take her seriously. > > > even California is canceling its high speed train project > > > https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/feb/12/california-high-speed-rail-la-san-francisco-cancelled > What part of the Green New Deal Resolution are you referring to? The word "rail" only shows up once in the document. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 10:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcln97Fe5soU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727306 |
On 2/14/19 7:39 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Shit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > <...> > >> Your anger is at yourself -- for having nothing to offer. Look at how >> you feel the need to lie about her and attack her. It is a typical fear >> response. > > <...> > > Fear? C'mon, Snit, even you can't be THAT stupid. > > People are LAUGHING at the girl's ignorance and > at her oversized mouth that is only good for puking > socialist pabulum. > Interesting how you have no counter to her comments nor the Green New Deal Resolution. You are demonstrating a strong fear response. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 05:48 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q42oeg$1mce$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727198 |
On 2/13/2019 8:30 PM, benj wrote: > Yeah,, AOC has lots to bring to the table. I mean the destruction of all > human civilization isn't going nearly fast enough so AOC has some great > Socialist ideas to end it all much sooner. Remember how great > collectivism utopia is? Sure killing off hundreds of million isn the > billions neede to empty the planet, but hey you have to start somewhere. > I'm sure AOC has a plan. What a horrifying mischaracterization of her! You apologize to Ocasio-Cortez. Now. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 07:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvu0bf.6os.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #726987 |
On 2019-02-12 10:57 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >> dramatically different because of climate change. > > Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. > stick it up your jimp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web