Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #726976 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-13 05:57 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-02-13 08:44 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 225 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 05:57 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-12 21:05 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 13:48 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:01 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 09:05 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 11:24 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 10:58 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 12:03 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:27 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:11 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:14 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:07 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 15:27 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:44 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 10:57 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 13:20 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 12:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 12:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 14:40 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 08:07 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Snit Once Again Publicy Worships AOC and Her Herd Of Unicorns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 11:48 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 10:18 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:24 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 15:41 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:45 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 17:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 13:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 12:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 05:57 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 06:11 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 18:07 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 20:45 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp - 2019-02-13 13:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 16:14 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:50 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:29 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-14 03:54 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 21:04 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:34 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 08:00 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:20 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:02 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 15:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:59 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:09 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:59 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:16 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:14 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-14 15:16 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 06:08 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:21 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 23:16 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:34 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 02:51 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 08:28 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 09:51 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 11:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 11:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 15:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 16:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:38 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:44 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:54 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:56 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 19:46 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 19:54 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:45 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:48 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 19:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:41 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:55 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 20:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 20:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 20:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 20:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 20:55 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:02 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:11 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:01 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 17:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:42 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:17 -0700
Snit Keeps crying to himself Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 17:23 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:16 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 17:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:42 -0700
Poor Snit complains to himself. Again. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:43 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 13:44 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 11:48 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:27 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-15 07:24 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-15 05:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 15:58 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 16:20 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:30 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 18:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 18:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:29 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:44 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:58 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 20:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:04 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 20:29 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 09:39 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-14 10:39 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 05:48 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:28 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 07:47 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 08:44 -0700
Page 2 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 12 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 11:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvueil.eda.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727058 |
On 2019-02-13 9:33 a.m., Snit wrote: > mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>> >>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>> table. >>>>> >>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>> >>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>> >>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>> >>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >> >> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >> different. >> > > And that he is a lousy business man. And an immoral one. > and up his bum
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 13:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjc2dFsu74U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727074 |
On 2/13/19 11:52 AM, % wrote: > On 2019-02-13 9:33 a.m., Snit wrote: >> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>> >>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>> table. >>>>>> >>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>> >>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons >>>>> job. >>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>> >>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse >>>>> yourselves >>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>> >>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>> >>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>> different. >>> >> >> And that he is a lousy business man. And an immoral one. >> > > and up his bum You got to look at Mueller's evidence, too... amazing. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 13:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvujar.s12.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727095 |
On 2019-02-13 1:13 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 2/13/19 11:52 AM, % wrote: >> On 2019-02-13 9:33 a.m., Snit wrote: >>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>> table. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common >>>>>> persons job. >>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>> >>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only >>>>>> ones >>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse >>>>>> yourselves >>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>> >>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>>> >>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>>> different. >>>> >>> >>> And that he is a lousy business man. And an immoral one. >>> >> >> and up his bum > > You got to look at Mueller's evidence, too... amazing. > i'm a canadian what do i care
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 13:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjcprFt2rfU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727096 |
On 2/13/19 1:13 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-02-13 1:13 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 2/13/19 11:52 AM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-02-13 9:33 a.m., Snit wrote: >>>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common >>>>>>> persons job. >>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only >>>>>>> ones >>>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse >>>>>>> yourselves >>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>> >>>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>>>> >>>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>>>> different. >>>>> >>>> >>>> And that he is a lousy business man. And an immoral one. >>>> >>> >>> and up his bum >> >> You got to look at Mueller's evidence, too... amazing. >> > > i'm a canadian what do i care Well, you saw the video. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 13:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ad1d0332-a214-41d0-a79a-afd0480809c9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #727096 |
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 3:13:48 PM UTC-5, % wrote: > On 2019-02-13 1:13 p.m., Snit wrote: > > On 2/13/19 11:52 AM, % wrote: > >> On 2019-02-13 9:33 a.m., Snit wrote: > >>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > >>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, > >>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit > >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the > >>>>>>> table. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common > >>>>>> persons job. > >>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only > >>>>>> ones > >>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse > >>>>>> yourselves > >>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. > >>>>> > >>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at > >>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. > >>>> > >>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's > >>>> different. > >>> > >>> And that he is a lousy business man. And an immoral one. > >> > >> and up his bum > > > > You got to look at Mueller's evidence, too... amazing. > > i'm a canadian what do i care Well %, aren't Canadians planning to build a wall south of their border? Oceans couldn't keep USA out of all other continents, but a wall would?! Don't fence/wall me in... the real reason behind Orange Man's Wall! Shh... -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 15:27 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q4224u$kv9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727116 |
On 2/13/2019 3:07 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 3:13:48 PM UTC-5, % wrote:
>> On 2019-02-13 1:13 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> On 2/13/19 11:52 AM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2019-02-13 9:33 a.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>,
>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says...
>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit
>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the
>>>>>>>>> table.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common
>>>>>>>> persons job.
>>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only
>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse
>>>>>>>> yourselves
>>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at
>>>>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's
>>>>>> different.
>>>>>
>>>>> And that he is a lousy business man. And an immoral one.
>>>>
>>>> and up his bum
>>>
>>> You got to look at Mueller's evidence, too... amazing.
>>
>> i'm a canadian what do i care
>
> Well %, aren't Canadians planning to build a wall south of their border?
> Oceans couldn't keep USA out of all other continents, but a wall would?!
> Don't fence/wall me in... the real reason behind Orange Man's Wall! Shh...
>
> -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
>
if there is a wall,
they can charge people to go through it,
a turnstile
or have booths and sell them 1 month family tickets to see Chicago, and
put them on a bus to go there
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1605212f-7d75-47e2-b513-87086b9aacac@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #727135 |
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 4:28:05 PM UTC-5, Serg Io wrote: > On 2/13/2019 3:07 PM, Mahipal wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 3:13:48 PM UTC-5, % wrote: > >> On 2019-02-13 1:13 p.m., Snit wrote: > >>> On 2/13/19 11:52 AM, % wrote: > >>>> On 2019-02-13 9:33 a.m., Snit wrote: > >>>>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > >>>>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, > >>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit > >>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the > >>>>>>>>> table. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common > >>>>>>>> persons job. > >>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only > >>>>>>>> ones > >>>>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse > >>>>>>>> yourselves > >>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at > >>>>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's > >>>>>> different. > >>>>> > >>>>> And that he is a lousy business man. And an immoral one. > >>>> > >>>> and up his bum > >>> > >>> You got to look at Mueller's evidence, too... amazing. > >> > >> i'm a canadian what do i care > > > > Well %, aren't Canadians planning to build a wall south of their border? > > Oceans couldn't keep USA out of all other continents, but a wall would?! > > Don't fence/wall me in... the real reason behind Orange Man's Wall! Shh... > > > > -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८! > > if there is a wall, > they can charge people to go through it, > a turnstile > or have booths and sell them 1 month family tickets to see Chicago, and > put them on a bus to go there What's ridiculus to me about the funding for a worthless ineffective wall, from an engineering materials cost perspective. Is... No matter what materials the wall is proposed to be built from, the cost remains the same. Can we build it out of gold? Cost remains the same?! Sure! Fwiw, the only financial hoopla is likely that TrumpET has connections in the real estate markets and needs to direct some money easy there. Pay back? He only talks -- win or lose -- in measures of money Money MONEY! Pay forward? Perhaps. Real estate investments? So many open questions... Sure pay turnstiles! Charge them by the passage. E-ZPass effectively already does that. It's pricing, it's tolls, are rumoured to be designed/set so as to keep out those who can't afford them, keep 'em out of say... Manhattan. Digital electronic walls... known to work rather well to reduce incoming traffic. Pay or stay away. Out! If a wall is a must a shall, make it out of solar panels. Sell the energy. Passage into USA is already for sale, I think an influx of above $500,000.00 will buy one Green Card. One and only one. Maybe, a family? I doubt that. -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 10:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce088c2905132213bb@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727055 |
In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > >On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>> >>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>> table. >>>> >>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>> >>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>> >>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >> >> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. > >People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >different. No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 13:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q41n5u$u81$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727065 |
On 2/13/2019 12:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>> >>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>> table. >>>>> >>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>> >>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>> >>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>> >>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >> >> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >> different. > > No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a > liar. Nobody is as famous for lying as he is. Even Kellyanne and Huckleberry and the Faux don't have the world renown for lying. He is the Lion of America. Chant after me! Lion Trump! Lion Trump! Lion Trump! Lion Trump! Lion Trump! Lion Trump! Lion Trump! Lion Trump! Lion Trump! Lion Trump! yay. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 12:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce1e4d2af8bbba13c5@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727072 |
In article <q41n5u$u81$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > >On 2/13/2019 12:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>> >>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>> table. >>>>>> >>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>> >>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>> >>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>> >>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>> >>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>> different. >> >> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >> liar. > >Nobody is as famous for lying as he is. Even Kellyanne and Huckleberry >and the Faux don't have the world renown for lying. > >He is the Lion of America. > >Chant after me! > >Lion Trump! >Lion Trump! >Lion Trump! >Lion Trump! >Lion Trump! >Lion Trump! >Lion Trump! >Lion Trump! >Lion Trump! >Lion Trump! > >yay. No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q41rl1$1mvd$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727085 |
On 2/13/2019 2:30 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <q41n5u$u81$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie > says... >> On 2/13/2019 12:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>> table. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>> >>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>> >>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>>> >>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>>> different. >>> >>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>> liar. >> >> Nobody is as famous for lying as he is. Even Kellyanne and Huckleberry >> and the Faux don't have the world renown for lying. >> >> He is the Lion of America. >> >> Chant after me! >> >> Lion Trump! >> Lion Trump! >> Lion Trump! >> Lion Trump! >> Lion Trump! >> Lion Trump! >> Lion Trump! >> Lion Trump! >> Lion Trump! >> Lion Trump! >> >> yay. > > No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a > liar. No, but we have proof that The Trump is a truly world class liar. A Genius liar. There is nobody better. And he whines better than anybody. A true professional. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 12:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce2128da8587f513ce@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727090 |
In article <q41rl1$1mvd$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > >On 2/13/2019 2:30 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <q41n5u$u81$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie >> says... >>> On 2/13/2019 12:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>> >>>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>>>> >>>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>>>> different. >>>> >>>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>>> liar. >>> >>> Nobody is as famous for lying as he is. Even Kellyanne and Huckleberry >>> and the Faux don't have the world renown for lying. >>> >>> He is the Lion of America. >>> >>> Chant after me! >>> >>> Lion Trump! >>> Lion Trump! >>> Lion Trump! >>> Lion Trump! >>> Lion Trump! >>> Lion Trump! >>> Lion Trump! >>> Lion Trump! >>> Lion Trump! >>> Lion Trump! >>> >>> yay. >> >> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >> liar. > >No, but we have proof that The Trump is a truly world class liar. A >Genius liar. There is nobody better. And he whines better than >anybody. A true professional. No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 12:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcj7umFs1kaU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727065 |
On 2/13/19 10:57 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >> >> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>> >>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>> table. >>>>> >>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>> >>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>> >>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>> >>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >> >> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >> different. > > No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a > liar. > Whenever you are in the public eye and speak a lot you will make claims which are found to not be true. You will present ideas to push your views and even get things wrong. But with Trump it is not that -- he is a pathological liar who rarely goes more than a few sentences without lying. And that is fine to note. For you to try to excuse it as nothing uncommon is another sign of worship of the wealthy. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 12:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce1e9d4b2fda7a13c7@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727075 |
In article <gcj7umFs1kaU5@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 2/13/19 10:57 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>> >>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>> >>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>> table. >>>>>> >>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>> >>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>> >>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>> >>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>> >>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>> different. >> >> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >> liar. >> > >Whenever you are in the public eye and speak a lot you will make claims >which are found to not be true. You will present ideas to push your >views and even get things wrong. But with Trump it is not that -- he is >a pathological liar who rarely goes more than a few sentences without lying. > >And that is fine to note. > >For you to try to excuse it as nothing uncommon is another sign of >worship of the wealthy. No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 13:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjciaFt2rfU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727087 |
On 2/13/19 12:32 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <gcj7umFs1kaU5@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> On 2/13/19 10:57 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>> >>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>> table. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>> >>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>> >>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>>> >>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>>> different. >>> >>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>> liar. >>> >> >> Whenever you are in the public eye and speak a lot you will make claims >> which are found to not be true. You will present ideas to push your >> views and even get things wrong. But with Trump it is not that -- he is >> a pathological liar who rarely goes more than a few sentences without lying. >> >> And that is fine to note. >> >> For you to try to excuse it as nothing uncommon is another sign of >> worship of the wealthy. > > No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a > liar. > Irrelevant to the point I made. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 13:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce2b4793aaf43f13d5@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727099 |
In article <gcjciaFt2rfU3@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 2/13/19 12:32 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <gcj7umFs1kaU5@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> On 2/13/19 10:57 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>> >>>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>> >>>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>>>> >>>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>>>> different. >>>> >>>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>>> liar. >>>> >>> >>> Whenever you are in the public eye and speak a lot you will make claims >>> which are found to not be true. You will present ideas to push your >>> views and even get things wrong. But with Trump it is not that -- he is >>> a pathological liar who rarely goes more than a few sentences without lying. >>> >>> And that is fine to note. >>> >>> For you to try to excuse it as nothing uncommon is another sign of >>> worship of the wealthy. >> >> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >> liar. >> > >Irrelevant to the point I made. The point is you losers point out the same flaws that your own side has.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjgbaFtrplU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727104 |
On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <gcjciaFt2rfU3@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> On 2/13/19 12:32 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <gcj7umFs1kaU5@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> >>>> On 2/13/19 10:57 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>>>>> >>>>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>>>>> different. >>>>> >>>>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>>>> liar. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Whenever you are in the public eye and speak a lot you will make claims >>>> which are found to not be true. You will present ideas to push your >>>> views and even get things wrong. But with Trump it is not that -- he is >>>> a pathological liar who rarely goes more than a few sentences without lying. >>>> >>>> And that is fine to note. >>>> >>>> For you to try to excuse it as nothing uncommon is another sign of >>>> worship of the wealthy. >>> >>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>> liar. >>> >> >> Irrelevant to the point I made. > > The point is you losers point out the same flaws that your own side has. > You lash out with insults and false accusations because you cannot defend how deeply dishonest Trump is... far more than other public figures. Fair enough. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce3be6ca2fd1da13e0@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727133 |
In article <gcjgbaFtrplU7@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <gcjciaFt2rfU3@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> On 2/13/19 12:32 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <gcj7umFs1kaU5@mid.individual.net>, >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>> >>>>> On 2/13/19 10:57 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>>>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>>>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>>>>>> different. >>>>>> >>>>>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>>>>> liar. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Whenever you are in the public eye and speak a lot you will make claims >>>>> which are found to not be true. You will present ideas to push your >>>>> views and even get things wrong. But with Trump it is not that -- he is >>>>> a pathological liar who rarely goes more than a few sentences without lying. >>>>> >>>>> And that is fine to note. >>>>> >>>>> For you to try to excuse it as nothing uncommon is another sign of >>>>> worship of the wealthy. >>>> >>>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>>> liar. >>>> >>> >>> Irrelevant to the point I made. >> >> The point is you losers point out the same flaws that your own side has. >> > >You lash out with insults and false accusations because you cannot >defend how deeply dishonest Trump is... far more than other public figures. > >Fair enough. Nice spin, you refute yourself again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gcji79Fua8cU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727133 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <gcjciaFt2rfU3@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> On 2/13/19 12:32 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <gcj7umFs1kaU5@mid.individual.net>, >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>> >>>>> On 2/13/19 10:57 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>>>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>>>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>>>>>> different. >>>>>> >>>>>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>>>>> liar. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Whenever you are in the public eye and speak a lot you will make claims >>>>> which are found to not be true. You will present ideas to push your >>>>> views and even get things wrong. But with Trump it is not that -- he is >>>>> a pathological liar who rarely goes more than a few sentences without lying. >>>>> >>>>> And that is fine to note. >>>>> >>>>> For you to try to excuse it as nothing uncommon is another sign of >>>>> worship of the wealthy. >>>> >>>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>>> liar. >>>> >>> >>> Irrelevant to the point I made. >> >> The point is you losers point out the same flaws that your own side has. >> > > You lash out with insults and false accusations because you cannot > defend how deeply dishonest Trump is... far more than other public figures. > > Fair enough. > Skeeter saw this and freaked out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 15:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce4362be6efe7713ee@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727151 |
In article <gcji79Fua8cU8@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <gcjciaFt2rfU3@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> >>>> On 2/13/19 12:32 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <gcj7umFs1kaU5@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/13/19 10:57 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <q41gc2$1v46$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 11:05 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <gcitblFpq5kU6@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the only ones >>>>>>>>>> offered they are the best on the table. As you and others recuse yourselves >>>>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You try to make something out of nothing. Why do people poke fun at >>>>>>>>> Trump because he's rich? Same thing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> People poke fun at Trump because he's a lying idiot asshole. That's >>>>>>>> different. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>>>>>> liar. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Whenever you are in the public eye and speak a lot you will make claims >>>>>> which are found to not be true. You will present ideas to push your >>>>>> views and even get things wrong. But with Trump it is not that -- he is >>>>>> a pathological liar who rarely goes more than a few sentences without lying. >>>>>> >>>>>> And that is fine to note. >>>>>> >>>>>> For you to try to excuse it as nothing uncommon is another sign of >>>>>> worship of the wealthy. >>>>> >>>>> No one has shown me any proof that any other person in govt is not a >>>>> liar. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Irrelevant to the point I made. >>> >>> The point is you losers point out the same flaws that your own side has. >>> >> >> You lash out with insults and false accusations because you cannot >> defend how deeply dishonest Trump is... far more than other public figures. >> >> Fair enough. >> > >Skeeter saw this and freaked out. Do you always answer your own posts? Do you seek attention that much? Don't you have a job to go to?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web