Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #726976 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-13 05:57 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-02-13 08:44 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 225 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 05:57 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-12 21:05 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 13:48 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:01 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 09:05 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 11:24 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 10:58 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 12:03 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:27 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:11 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:14 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:07 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 15:27 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:44 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 10:57 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 13:20 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 12:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 12:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 14:40 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 08:07 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Snit Once Again Publicy Worships AOC and Her Herd Of Unicorns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 11:48 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 10:18 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:24 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 15:41 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:45 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 17:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 13:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 12:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 05:57 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 06:11 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 18:07 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 20:45 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp - 2019-02-13 13:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 16:14 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:50 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:29 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-14 03:54 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 21:04 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:34 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 08:00 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:20 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:02 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 15:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:59 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:09 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:59 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:16 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:14 -0700
Re: β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-14 15:16 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 06:08 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:21 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 23:16 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:34 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 02:51 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 08:28 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 09:51 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 11:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 11:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 15:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 16:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:38 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:44 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:54 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:56 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 19:46 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 19:54 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:45 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:48 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 19:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:41 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:55 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 20:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 20:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 20:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 20:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 20:55 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:02 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:11 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:01 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 17:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:42 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:17 -0700
Snit Keeps crying to himself Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 17:23 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:16 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 17:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:42 -0700
Poor Snit complains to himself. Again. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:43 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 13:44 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 11:48 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:27 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-15 07:24 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-15 05:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 15:58 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 16:20 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:30 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 18:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 18:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:29 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:44 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:58 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 20:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:04 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 20:29 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 09:39 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-14 10:39 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 05:48 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:28 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 07:47 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 08:44 -0700
Page 4 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 12 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gcji79Fua8cU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727140 |
Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <gcjg8fFtrplU5@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <gcjckbFt2rfU4@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> >>>> On 2/13/19 12:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>> table. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>> >>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>>>>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>> >>>>> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >>>>> supposed to solve? >>>> >>>> High speed rail likely has a lower impact on CO2 emissions than does air >>>> travel, but I am surely not an expert on all aspects of the only >>>> proposal on the table. >>> >>> Can we tunnel under the ocean to get to other countrys? >>> >> >> Seems like an absurd idea but if you want to show we can by all means I >> will listen. > > OK, can we build a high speed rail to Europe? > Not that I can see. Do you have ideas for one?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 15:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce432d90f6318e13ed@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727150 |
In article <gcji79Fua8cU7@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> In article <gcjg8fFtrplU5@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <gcjckbFt2rfU4@mid.individual.net>, >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>> >>>>> On 2/13/19 12:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>>>>>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>> >>>>>> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >>>>>> supposed to solve? >>>>> >>>>> High speed rail likely has a lower impact on CO2 emissions than does air >>>>> travel, but I am surely not an expert on all aspects of the only >>>>> proposal on the table. >>>> >>>> Can we tunnel under the ocean to get to other countrys? >>>> >>> >>> Seems like an absurd idea but if you want to show we can by all means I >>> will listen. >> >> OK, can we build a high speed rail to Europe? >> > >Not that I can see. Do you have ideas for one? So if we get rid of airplanes...welll
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 22:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gcjjb4F1isU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727157 |
Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <gcji79Fua8cU7@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> In article <gcjg8fFtrplU5@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> >>>> On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <gcjckbFt2rfU4@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/13/19 12:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>>>>>>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >>>>>>> supposed to solve? >>>>>> >>>>>> High speed rail likely has a lower impact on CO2 emissions than does air >>>>>> travel, but I am surely not an expert on all aspects of the only >>>>>> proposal on the table. >>>>> >>>>> Can we tunnel under the ocean to get to other countrys? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Seems like an absurd idea but if you want to show we can by all means I >>>> will listen. >>> >>> OK, can we build a high speed rail to Europe? >>> >> >> Not that I can see. Do you have ideas for one? > > So if we get rid of airplanes...welll > Is that your best proposal?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 15:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce458fbf21c64c13f5@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727161 |
In article <gcjjb4F1isU2@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> In article <gcji79Fua8cU7@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> In article <gcjg8fFtrplU5@mid.individual.net>, >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>> >>>>> On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <gcjckbFt2rfU4@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2/13/19 12:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>>>>>>>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >>>>>>>> supposed to solve? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> High speed rail likely has a lower impact on CO2 emissions than does air >>>>>>> travel, but I am surely not an expert on all aspects of the only >>>>>>> proposal on the table. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can we tunnel under the ocean to get to other countrys? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Seems like an absurd idea but if you want to show we can by all means I >>>>> will listen. >>>> >>>> OK, can we build a high speed rail to Europe? >>>> >>> >>> Not that I can see. Do you have ideas for one? >> >> So if we get rid of airplanes...welll >> > >Is that your best proposal? I am poking holes in the "new green deal"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 22:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gcjjomF43mU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727164 |
Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <gcjjb4F1isU2@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> In article <gcji79Fua8cU7@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> >>>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> In article <gcjg8fFtrplU5@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <gcjckbFt2rfU4@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 12:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>>>>>>>>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>>>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >>>>>>>>> supposed to solve? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> High speed rail likely has a lower impact on CO2 emissions than does air >>>>>>>> travel, but I am surely not an expert on all aspects of the only >>>>>>>> proposal on the table. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can we tunnel under the ocean to get to other countrys? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Seems like an absurd idea but if you want to show we can by all means I >>>>>> will listen. >>>>> >>>>> OK, can we build a high speed rail to Europe? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Not that I can see. Do you have ideas for one? >>> >>> So if we get rid of airplanes...welll >>> >> >> Is that your best proposal? > > I am poking holes in the "new green deal" > What page do you mean? Can you quote what you think you are poking holes in?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 15:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce485ec367c0f313fd@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727167 |
In article <gcjjomF43mU1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> In article <gcjjb4F1isU2@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> In article <gcji79Fua8cU7@mid.individual.net>, >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>> >>>>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> In article <gcjg8fFtrplU5@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <gcjckbFt2rfU4@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 12:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>>>>>>>>>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>>>>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >>>>>>>>>> supposed to solve? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> High speed rail likely has a lower impact on CO2 emissions than does air >>>>>>>>> travel, but I am surely not an expert on all aspects of the only >>>>>>>>> proposal on the table. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can we tunnel under the ocean to get to other countrys? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Seems like an absurd idea but if you want to show we can by all means I >>>>>>> will listen. >>>>>> >>>>>> OK, can we build a high speed rail to Europe? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Not that I can see. Do you have ideas for one? >>>> >>>> So if we get rid of airplanes...welll >>>> >>> >>> Is that your best proposal? >> >> I am poking holes in the "new green deal" >> > >What page do you mean? Can you quote what you think you are poking holes >in? All of them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 15:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjkpmFasuU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727169 |
On 2/13/19 3:30 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <gcjjomF43mU1@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> In article <gcjjb4F1isU2@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> >>>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> In article <gcji79Fua8cU7@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> In article <gcjg8fFtrplU5@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <gcjckbFt2rfU4@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 12:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>>>>>>>>>>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>>>>>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >>>>>>>>>>> supposed to solve? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> High speed rail likely has a lower impact on CO2 emissions than does air >>>>>>>>>> travel, but I am surely not an expert on all aspects of the only >>>>>>>>>> proposal on the table. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can we tunnel under the ocean to get to other countrys? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Seems like an absurd idea but if you want to show we can by all means I >>>>>>>> will listen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK, can we build a high speed rail to Europe? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not that I can see. Do you have ideas for one? >>>>> >>>>> So if we get rid of airplanes...welll >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is that your best proposal? >>> >>> I am poking holes in the "new green deal" >>> >> >> What page do you mean? Can you quote what you think you are poking holes >> in? > > All of them. > So no quotes. No evidence. You were presenting YOUR ideas. Got it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 15:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce4bd58eadc5091402@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727171 |
In article <gcjkpmFasuU5@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 2/13/19 3:30 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <gcjjomF43mU1@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> In article <gcjjb4F1isU2@mid.individual.net>, >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>> >>>>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> In article <gcji79Fua8cU7@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <gcjg8fFtrplU5@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <gcjckbFt2rfU4@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 12:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>>>>>>>>>>>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>>>>>>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to solve? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> High speed rail likely has a lower impact on CO2 emissions than does air >>>>>>>>>>> travel, but I am surely not an expert on all aspects of the only >>>>>>>>>>> proposal on the table. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can we tunnel under the ocean to get to other countrys? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Seems like an absurd idea but if you want to show we can by all means I >>>>>>>>> will listen. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK, can we build a high speed rail to Europe? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not that I can see. Do you have ideas for one? >>>>>> >>>>>> So if we get rid of airplanes...welll >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is that your best proposal? >>>> >>>> I am poking holes in the "new green deal" >>>> >>> >>> What page do you mean? Can you quote what you think you are poking holes >>> in? >> >> All of them. >> > >So no quotes. No evidence. You were presenting YOUR ideas. > >Got it. Just pointing out what a joke it is. No quotes needed. Now please continue to show your service to me by responding to your own posts begging for my attention.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 17:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjqgpF1fogU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727173 |
On 2/13/19 3:45 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <gcjkpmFasuU5@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> On 2/13/19 3:30 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <gcjjomF43mU1@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> >>>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> In article <gcjjb4F1isU2@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> In article <gcji79Fua8cU7@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <gcjg8fFtrplU5@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 1:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <gcjckbFt2rfU4@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/19 12:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> table. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to solve? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> High speed rail likely has a lower impact on CO2 emissions than does air >>>>>>>>>>>> travel, but I am surely not an expert on all aspects of the only >>>>>>>>>>>> proposal on the table. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Can we tunnel under the ocean to get to other countrys? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Seems like an absurd idea but if you want to show we can by all means I >>>>>>>>>> will listen. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> OK, can we build a high speed rail to Europe? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not that I can see. Do you have ideas for one? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So if we get rid of airplanes...welll >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is that your best proposal? >>>>> >>>>> I am poking holes in the "new green deal" >>>>> >>>> >>>> What page do you mean? Can you quote what you think you are poking holes >>>> in? >>> >>> All of them. >>> >> >> So no quotes. No evidence. You were presenting YOUR ideas. >> >> Got it. > > > Just pointing out what a joke it is. No quotes needed. You realized YOUR ideas are a joke. Good. Now you want to pretend they were NOT your ideas. You are ashamed of your own ideas. > Now please continue to show your service to me by responding to your own > posts begging for my attention. You do not like how I respond to your trolling. Boo hoo for you. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 13:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <Eg%8E.1188$jZ6.914@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #727100 |
On 2/13/2019 1:22 PM, Snit wrote: > On 2/13/19 12:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>> >>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>> table. >>>> >>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>> >>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>> >>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >> >> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >> supposed to solve? > > High speed rail likely has a lower impact on CO2 emissions > than does air travel What about the total environmental impact of replacing every single commercial air flight with high speed rail trains? How is it even possible to criss-cross the whole country with new railroad tracks? Where are you going to come up with the trillions of dollars to build the railroads? Where are you going to get the new courts to litigate twenty million eminent domain land condemnation lawsuits? How are you going to construct rail lines linking North America with Europe, Hawaii, Asia, Africa, Australia, etc? What are you going to do when you find all this new rail construction threatens the habitats of a hundred threatened species? Is there anything about the existing high-speed railroads that even remotely suggests replacing air flight with trains is a good idea? And what are you going to use to power those high-speed trains? Do you think you can use wind power generated by those trains going really fast? AOC is an idiot for proposing this. Anyone who thinks it's a good idea is also an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjg40FtrplU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727107 |
On 2/13/19 1:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 2/13/2019 1:22 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 2/13/19 12:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>>> >>>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>>> table. >>>>> >>>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>> >>>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons >>>> job. >>>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>>> >>>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >>> >>> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >>> supposed to solve? >> >> High speed rail likely has a lower impact on CO2 emissions than does >> air travel > > What about the total environmental impact of replacing every > single commercial air flight with high speed rail trains? Does not seem possible, but if we ended all air flight it would likely lower damage. Of course, we should have a risk / benefit analysis. There are CLEARLY some big risks with ending air flight! > How > is it even possible to criss-cross the whole country with new > railroad tracks? Are you planning on doing so? > Where are you going to come up with the > trillions of dollars to build the railroads?Β Where are you > going to get the new courts to litigate twenty million eminent > domain land condemnation lawsuits?Β How are you going to construct > rail lines linking North America with Europe, Hawaii, Asia, > Africa, Australia, etc?Β What are you going to do when you find > all this new rail construction threatens the habitats of a > hundred threatened species?Β Is there anything about the existing > high-speed railroads that even remotely suggests replacing air > flight with trains is a good idea?Β And what are you going to > use to power those high-speed trains?Β Do you think you can use > wind power generated by those trains going really fast? > > AOC is an idiot for proposing this.Β Anyone who thinks it's a > good idea is also an idiot. You are the one asking about these things. The word "air" appears in her New Deal Resolution on five pages, and none push what you are suggesting. The word "rail" shows up once, and it also does not suggest what you do. But if you think your ideas -- presented above -- are better than the ones she presented in the New Deal Resolution then encourage your representatives to push them. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:37 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q41v5v$8jb$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727081 |
On 2/13/2019 1:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>> >>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>> >>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>> table. >>> >>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>> >> >> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >> You show your worship of the wealthy. >> >> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >> you show you have nothing better to offer. > > What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail > supposed to solve? it trades burning Diesel for Kerosene. it creates huge problems, huge infrastructure projects, why buy all that land for right of way ? just fly over it California High speed rail project is being cancelled.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjg6mFtrplU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727106 |
On 2/13/19 1:37 PM, Serg Io wrote: > On 2/13/2019 1:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 2/13/2019 9:01 AM, Snit wrote: >>> KlausΒ Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >>>> >>>> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >>>> table. >>>> >>>> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. >>>> >>> >>> Back to your denials and you lash out that she had a common persons job. >>> You show your worship of the wealthy. >>> >>> No matter how much you dislike her solutions if they are the >>> only ones offered they are the best on the table. ... >>> you show you have nothing better to offer. >> >> What problem is replacing air travel with high-speed rail >> supposed to solve? > > it trades burning Diesel for Kerosene. > > it creates huge problems, huge infrastructure projects, why buy all that > land for right of way ? just fly over it > > California High speed rail project is being cancelled. > It is an odd thing for Just Wondering to propose... but I guess it is better than just running away from the question. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 12:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <n5_8E.47148$eM1.25675@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #727020 |
On 2/13/2019 2:48 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions > > You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the > table. > > You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 12:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvugcf.bgh.17.10@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727079 |
On 2019-02-13 12:19 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: > On 2/13/2019 2:48 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >> >> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >> table. >> >> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. > > If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate. how long have you been a boner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 13:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjckkFt2rfU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727079 |
On 2/13/19 12:19 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 2/13/2019 2:48 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:05:45 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> I welcome Republicans to the table to help come up with solutions >> >> You can't welcome anyone to the table unless you're already at the >> table. >> >> You think the waitress has solutions. You're wrong. > > If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 05:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <77ocjf-3kb.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726976 |
In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be > dramatically different because of climate change. Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 06:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gchqnjFidg0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #726987 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >> dramatically different because of climate change. > > Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. > I hat does our best evidence say? Do you even know?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 18:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gv2ejf-nrf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726991 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>> dramatically different because of climate change. >> >> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >> > > I hat does our best evidence say? > > Do you even know? There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that some speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still speculation. Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we would be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was wrong. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over every speculative "tipping point"? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 13:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjc7fFsu74U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727070 |
On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>> >>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>> >> >> I hat does our best evidence say? >> >> Do you even know? > > There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for you. I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. > Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that some > speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still > speculation. > > Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we would > be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. > > Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was > wrong. > > http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo > > Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over > every speculative "tipping point"? As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are the best on the table. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web