Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #541511 > unrolled thread

Clouds Boost Arctic Warming More Than Expected

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Clouds Boost Arctic Warming More Than Expected Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 13:22 -0600
    Re: Clouds Boost Arctic Warming More Than Expected jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-25 19:35 +0000
      Re: Clouds Boost Arctic Warming More Than Expected Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 13:51 -0600
        Re: Clouds Boost Arctic Warming More Than Expected jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-25 20:25 +0000
        Re: Clouds Boost Arctic Warming More Than Expected benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 18:04 -0500

#541511 — Clouds Boost Arctic Warming More Than Expected

Clouds Boost Arctic Warming More Than Expected
> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/clouds-boost-arctic-warming-more-than-expected.html


> Humidity trends imply increased sensitivity to clouds in a warming
> Arctic, reports new research

> Abstract
>
> Infrared radiative processes are implicated in Arctic warming and
> sea-ice decline. The infrared cloud radiative effect (CRE) at the
> surface is modulated by cloud properties; however, CRE also depends
> on humidity because clouds emit at wavelengths that are
> semi-transparent to greenhouse gases, most notably water vapour. Here
> we show how temperature and humidity control CRE through competing
> influences between the mid- and far-infrared. At constant relative
> humidity, CRE does not decrease with increasing temperature/absolute
> humidity as expected, but rather is found to be approximately
> constant for temperatures characteristic of the Arctic. This
> stability is disrupted if relative humidity varies. Our findings
> explain observed seasonal and regional variability in Arctic CRE of
> order 10 W m−2. With the physical properties of Arctic clouds held
> constant, we calculate recent increases in CRE of 1–5 W m−2 in autumn
> and winter, which are projected to reach 5–15 W m−2 by 2050, implying
> increased sensitivity of the surface to clouds.
>
> Citation
>
> Humidity trends imply increased sensitivity to clouds in a warming
> Arctic by Christopher J. Cox, Von P. Walden, Penny M. Rowe and
> Matthew D. Shupe, published in Nature Communications,
> doi:10.1038/ncomms10117


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#541515

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clouds Boost Arctic Warming More Than Expected
>> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/clouds-boost-arctic-warming-more-than-expected.html
> 
> 
>> Humidity trends imply increased sensitivity to clouds in a warming
>> Arctic, reports new research
> 
>> Abstract
>>
>> Infrared radiative processes are implicated in Arctic warming and
>> sea-ice decline. The infrared cloud radiative effect (CRE) at the
>> surface is modulated by cloud properties; however, CRE also depends
>> on humidity because clouds emit at wavelengths that are
>> semi-transparent to greenhouse gases, most notably water vapour. Here
>> we show how temperature and humidity control CRE through competing
>> influences between the mid- and far-infrared. At constant relative
>> humidity, CRE does not decrease with increasing temperature/absolute
>> humidity as expected, but rather is found to be approximately
>> constant for temperatures characteristic of the Arctic. This
>> stability is disrupted if relative humidity varies. Our findings
>> explain observed seasonal and regional variability in Arctic CRE of
>> order 10 W m−2. With the physical properties of Arctic clouds held
>> constant, we calculate recent increases in CRE of 1–5 W m−2 in autumn
>> and winter, which are projected to reach 5–15 W m−2 by 2050, implying
>> increased sensitivity of the surface to clouds.
>>
>> Citation
>>
>> Humidity trends imply increased sensitivity to clouds in a warming
>> Arctic by Christopher J. Cox, Von P. Walden, Penny M. Rowe and
>> Matthew D. Shupe, published in Nature Communications,
>> doi:10.1038/ncomms10117
 
This is just a repaste of your original cut and paste, spamming shit head.

If "climate science" is settled science, how can there be anything
new, spamming shit head?

 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#541520

On 12/25/15 1:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> This is just a repaste of your original cut and paste, spamming shit head.
>
> If "climate science" is settled science, how can there be anything
> new, spamming shit head?




   Now, now, jimp, there you go again, you're outta control, your
   language is inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total
   disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp,
   need these services:
 > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes

   Clouds Boost Arctic Warming More Than Expected
> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/clouds-boost-arctic-warming-more-than-expected.html

 > Humidity trends imply increased sensitivity to clouds in a warming
 > Arctic, reports new research

 > Abstract
 >
 > Infrared radiative processes are implicated in Arctic warming and
 > sea-ice decline. The infrared cloud radiative effect (CRE) at the
 > surface is modulated by cloud properties; however, CRE also depends
 > on humidity because clouds emit at wavelengths that are
 > semi-transparent to greenhouse gases, most notably water vapour. Here
 > we show how temperature and humidity control CRE through competing
 > influences between the mid- and far-infrared. At constant relative
 > humidity, CRE does not decrease with increasing temperature/absolute
 > humidity as expected, but rather is found to be approximately
 > constant for temperatures characteristic of the Arctic. This
 > stability is disrupted if relative humidity varies. Our findings
 > explain observed seasonal and regional variability in Arctic CRE of
 > order 10 W m−2. With the physical properties of Arctic clouds held
 > constant, we calculate recent increases in CRE of 1–5 W m−2 in autumn
 > and winter, which are projected to reach 5–15 W m−2 by 2050, implying
 > increased sensitivity of the surface to clouds.
 >
 > Citation
 >
 > Humidity trends imply increased sensitivity to clouds in a warming
 > Arctic by Christopher J. Cox, Von P. Walden, Penny M. Rowe and
 > Matthew D. Shupe, published in Nature Communications,
 > doi:10.1038/ncomms10117



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#541529

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/25/15 1:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> This is just a repaste of your original cut and paste, spamming shit head.
>>
>> If "climate science" is settled science, how can there be anything
>> new, spamming shit head?
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Now, now, jimp, there you go again, you're outta control, your

Fuck off and die, spamming shit head.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#541539

On 12/25/2015 02:51 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 12/25/15 1:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> This is just a repaste of your original cut and paste, spamming shit
>> head.
>>
>> If "climate science" is settled science, how can there be anything
>> new, spamming shit head?
>
>
>
>
>    Now, now, jimp, there you go again, you're outta control, your
>    language is inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total
>    disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp,
>    need these services:
>  > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes
>
>    Clouds Boost Arctic Warming More Than Expected

Sorry Sam, truth is not anger. I get accused of anger all the time. 
Truth is quite plain. You ARE a spamming shit head. There can be no 
"more than expected" because it's all "settled science". Case closed.


-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web