Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #721880 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-01 05:15 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-01-18 21:09 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 249 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-01 05:15 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 03:52 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-03 22:30 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 09:31 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 10:24 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 13:56 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 12:01 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-04 18:12 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-05 11:28 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-05 13:07 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-09 07:01 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 09:33 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-09 10:33 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:18 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-09 23:24 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 10:59 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:22 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:02 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 00:25 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:54 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 05:01 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:05 +0000
NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:27 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 16:43 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 19:17 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:36 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:54 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 11:03 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 11:05 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change eSrgio <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 12:04 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:56 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 19:59 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 22:36 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 08:38 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:52 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:50 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 14:35 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-14 00:01 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 19:54 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-15 02:28 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 20:58 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-15 00:03 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 23:52 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:36 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 04:04 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-16 09:38 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:49 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:41 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:45 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 14:53 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:57 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 15:05 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:50 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:23 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-16 20:31 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-16 18:40 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-16 19:02 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:09 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:20 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:30 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:59 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:04 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:47 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 10:15 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:54 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:20 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:24 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 18:30 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:10 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:12 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:34 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:23 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:31 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:49 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 04:06 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 20:19 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 06:24 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 23:28 -0800
Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 22:09 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 15:22 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:27 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:20 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:32 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:40 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:46 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 22:26 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:38 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 15:11 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 00:29 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 18:57 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 03:48 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:58 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 21:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 23:48 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 10:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:10 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:43 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:42 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:17 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 02:41 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:34 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:36 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:48 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:53 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:57 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:10 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:44 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:25 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:44 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:32 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:53 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:59 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:49 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 17:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 20:58 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 21:00 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-20 09:17 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:45 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:47 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:50 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-20 10:08 -0800
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:39 -0500
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 12:10 -0700
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-20 15:31 -0800
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 16:34 -0700
Nadegda can't handle the truth. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-20 10:31 -0800
Re: Nadegda can't handle the truth. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:32 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:40 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:40 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:29 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:12 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:38 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:41 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:52 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:57 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 18:03 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 21:56 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:56 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:35 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 01:22 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 18:49 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 02:01 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-19 21:03 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 19:09 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:16 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:51 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 23:04 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:16 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 00:00 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:57 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-21 17:19 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:53 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:20 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:19 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:20 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:12 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:33 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 11:07 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 07:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 09:42 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:59 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-09 09:49 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-09 13:28 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 14:38 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 17:13 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:12 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 15:22 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-10 15:28 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-11 09:48 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:03 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 19:26 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:20 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:57 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-01-20 07:29 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-01 16:07 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-01 10:36 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 09:38 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 11:49 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:23 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:33 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:38 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:37 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:41 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:43 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:05 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:18 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:32 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:42 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:50 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:54 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:05 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 15:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:00 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:04 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:17 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:25 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:44 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:06 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-01 12:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 09:33 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-17 20:23 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 00:13 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:34 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 21:09 -0800
Page 9 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 13 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 15:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <btsuk9.utv.19.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #724011 |
On 2019-01-19 3:38 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > <...> > >> So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >> but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >> drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. > > Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed > to file a single criminal charge against the President after > trying so hard for almost two years? > > How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? > my guess is it feels like being you only being aware of it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 15:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ad573bc4471161a32@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724011 |
In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > ><...> > >>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >>but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >>drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. > >Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed >to file a single criminal charge against the President after >trying so hard for almost two years? > >How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? And then there is this https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement- buzzfeed/index.html The left sure likes grabbing crumbs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 17:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <2ea74e1d45svuu8p220hr8ishnun9okcr1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #724017 |
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:48:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >><...> >> >>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >>>but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >>>drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >> >>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed >>to file a single criminal charge against the President after >>trying so hard for almost two years? >> >>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? > >And then there is this > >https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html > >The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in order to expose their constant lies. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 15:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ad59455e10592a38@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724020 |
In article <2ea74e1d45svuu8p220hr8ishnun9okcr1@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:48:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>><...> >>> >>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >>>>but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >>>>drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >>> >>>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed >>>to file a single criminal charge against the President after >>>trying so hard for almost two years? >>> >>>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? >> >>And then there is this >> >>https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html >> >>The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. > > . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing >blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in >order to expose their constant lies. They were all dancing in the streerts yesterday shouting "we finally got him" then daddy Mooler slapped reality into them. They shut up real quick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 18:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <s1b74e10pn9hmknt99htk32v60mro8l19u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #724027 |
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >In article <2ea74e1d45svuu8p220hr8ishnun9okcr1@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: <...> >>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >>>>>but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >>>>>drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >>>> >>>>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed >>>>to file a single criminal charge against the President after >>>>trying so hard for almost two years? >>>> >>>>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? >>> >>>And then there is this >>> >>>https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html >>> >>>The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. >> >> . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing >>blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in >>order to expose their constant lies. > >They were all dancing in the streerts yesterday shouting "we finally got >him" then daddy Mooler slapped reality into them. They shut up real >quick. Fucking sheeple. Not twenty IQ points between the lot of them. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ad5cba161d7cf0a45@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724030 |
In article <s1b74e10pn9hmknt99htk32v60mro8l19u@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>In article <2ea74e1d45svuu8p220hr8ishnun9okcr1@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > ><...> > >>>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >>>>>>but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >>>>>>drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >>>>> >>>>>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed >>>>>to file a single criminal charge against the President after >>>>>trying so hard for almost two years? >>>>> >>>>>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? >>>> >>>>And then there is this >>>> >>>>https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html >>>> >>>>The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. >>> >>> . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing >>>blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in >>>order to expose their constant lies. >> >>They were all dancing in the streerts yesterday shouting "we finally got >>him" then daddy Mooler slapped reality into them. They shut up real >>quick. > >Fucking sheeple. Not twenty IQ points between the >lot of them. The ones in here parrot CNN. I researched it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 21:56 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36adad66a4d81a5f996079@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #724030 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <s1b74e10pn9hmknt99htk32v60mro8l19u@ 4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... # # On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: # >In article <2ea74e1d45svuu8p220hr8ishnun9okcr1@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... # >>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: # >>>In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... # >>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: # # <...> # # >>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected # >>>>>but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of # >>>>>drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. # >>>> # >>>>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed # >>>>to file a single criminal charge against the President after # >>>>trying so hard for almost two years? # >>>> # >>>>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? # >>> # >>>And then there is this # >>> # >>>https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html # >>> # >>>The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. # >> # >> . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing # >>blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in # >>order to expose their constant lies. # > # >They were all dancing in the streerts yesterday shouting "we finally got # >him" then daddy Mooler slapped reality into them. They shut up real # >quick. # # Fucking sheeple. Not twenty IQ points between the # lot of them. "AMONG" the lot of them., Wurdsmith... -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre- Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 23:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <gahrpnFcsg0U9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #724020 |
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:52:18 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:48:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>><...> >>> >>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >>>>but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >>>>drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >>> >>>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed >>>to file a single criminal charge against the President after >>>trying so hard for almost two years? >>> >>>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? >> >>And then there is this >> >>https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html >> >>The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. > > . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing > blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in > order to expose their constant lies. No, it shows that Mueller is being objective. Justice will be served. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 17:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ad7050c2e2ac38a61@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724052 |
In article <gahrpnFcsg0U9@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says... > >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:52:18 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:48:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>><...> >>>> >>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >>>>>but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >>>>>drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >>>> >>>>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed >>>>to file a single criminal charge against the President after >>>>trying so hard for almost two years? >>>> >>>>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? >>> >>>And then there is this >>> >>>https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html >>> >>>The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. >> >> . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing >> blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in >> order to expose their constant lies. > >No, it shows that Mueller is being objective. > >Justice will be served. Justice for what?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 01:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <gai0r5Fcsg0U14@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #724065 |
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:35:53 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > In article <gahrpnFcsg0U9@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org > says... >> >>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:52:18 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:48:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>> wrote: >>>>In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, >>>>greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>><...> >>>>> >>>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I >>>>>>suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the >>>>>>above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >>>>> >>>>>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a >>>>>single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard for >>>>>almost two years? >>>>> >>>>>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? >>>> >>>>And then there is this >>>> >>>>https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/ index.html >>>> >>>>The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. >>> >>> . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing >>> blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in order to expose >>> their constant lies. >> >>No, it shows that Mueller is being objective. >> >>Justice will be served. > > Justice for what? Justice for justice's sake. Really, if you don't know understand that justice is a state, I have to wonder if you have a functioning conscience. If he's guilty, justice would be punishment for the wicked. If he's innocent (which I doubt), his vindication would be justice. See how that works? -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 18:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ad8191dd0ddaa6a78@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724068 |
In article <gai0r5Fcsg0U14@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says... > >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:35:53 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > >> In article <gahrpnFcsg0U9@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org >> says... >>> >>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:52:18 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:48:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>>>In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, >>>>>greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>><...> >>>>>> >>>>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I >>>>>>>suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the >>>>>>>above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >>>>>> >>>>>>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a >>>>>>single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard for >>>>>>almost two years? >>>>>> >>>>>>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? >>>>> >>>>>And then there is this >>>>> >>>>>https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/ >index.html >>>>> >>>>>The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. >>>> >>>> . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing >>>> blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in order to expose >>>> their constant lies. >>> >>>No, it shows that Mueller is being objective. >>> >>>Justice will be served. >> >> Justice for what? > >Justice for justice's sake. > >Really, if you don't know understand that justice is a state, I have to >wonder if you have a functioning conscience. > >If he's guilty, justice would be punishment for the wicked. > >If he's innocent (which I doubt), his vindication would be justice. > >See how that works? Nice way to twist an answer around, I expected no less.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 02:01 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <gai340FgqvvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #724070 |
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:49:29 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > In article <gai0r5Fcsg0U14@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org > says... >> >>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:35:53 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> In article <gahrpnFcsg0U9@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org >>> says... >>>> >>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:52:18 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:48:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, >>>>>>greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>><...> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I >>>>>>>>suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with >>>>>>>>the above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal >>>>>>>>behavior. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a >>>>>>>single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard >>>>>>>for almost two years? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? >>>>>> >>>>>>And then there is this >>>>>> >>>>>>https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/ >>index.html >>>>>> >>>>>>The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. >>>>> >>>>> . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing >>>>> blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in order to >>>>> expose their constant lies. >>>> >>>>No, it shows that Mueller is being objective. >>>> >>>>Justice will be served. >>> >>> Justice for what? >> >>Justice for justice's sake. >> >>Really, if you don't know understand that justice is a state, I have to >>wonder if you have a functioning conscience. >> >>If he's guilty, justice would be punishment for the wicked. >> >>If he's innocent (which I doubt), his vindication would be justice. >> >>See how that works? > > Nice way to twist an answer around, I expected no less. You aren't making any sense. You feeling okay? -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | turkey <turkey@invalid.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 21:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <FFQ0E.137299$f65.114716@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #724072 |
On 1/19/2019 9:01 PM, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:49:29 -0700, Skeeter wrote: <...> >> Nice way to twist an answer around, I expected no less. > > You aren't making any sense. > > You feeling okay? > He dropped his pocket.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 19:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ad865d4c2b208fa85@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724072 |
In article <gai340FgqvvU1@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says... > >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:49:29 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > >> In article <gai0r5Fcsg0U14@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org >> says... >>> >>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:35:53 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> In article <gahrpnFcsg0U9@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:52:18 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:48:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>><...> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I >>>>>>>>>suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with >>>>>>>>>the above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal >>>>>>>>>behavior. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a >>>>>>>>single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard >>>>>>>>for almost two years? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>And then there is this >>>>>>> >>>>>>>https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/ >>>index.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. >>>>>> >>>>>> . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing >>>>>> blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in order to >>>>>> expose their constant lies. >>>>> >>>>>No, it shows that Mueller is being objective. >>>>> >>>>>Justice will be served. >>>> >>>> Justice for what? >>> >>>Justice for justice's sake. >>> >>>Really, if you don't know understand that justice is a state, I have to >>>wonder if you have a functioning conscience. >>> >>>If he's guilty, justice would be punishment for the wicked. >>> >>>If he's innocent (which I doubt), his vindication would be justice. >>> >>>See how that works? >> >> Nice way to twist an answer around, I expected no less. > >You aren't making any sense. > >You feeling okay? Im always ok.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 04:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <q20sme$ptt$38@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #724072 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 02:01:36 +0000, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:49:29 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > >> In article <gai0r5Fcsg0U14@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org >> says... >>> >>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:35:53 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> In article <gahrpnFcsg0U9@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:52:18 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:48:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>In article <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>><...> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I >>>>>>>>>suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with >>>>>>>>>the above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal >>>>>>>>>behavior. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file >>>>>>>>a single criminal charge against the President after trying so >>>>>>>>hard for almost two years? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>And then there is this >>>>>>> >>>>>>>https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/ >>>index.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The left sure likes grabbing crumbs. >>>>>> >>>>>> . . .And their own ankles. LOL. It must be a crushing >>>>>> blow to them when their own Hero, Mooler, speaks up in order to >>>>>> expose their constant lies. >>>>> >>>>>No, it shows that Mueller is being objective. >>>>> >>>>>Justice will be served. >>>> >>>> Justice for what? >>> >>>Justice for justice's sake. >>> >>>Really, if you don't know understand that justice is a state, I have to >>>wonder if you have a functioning conscience. >>> >>>If he's guilty, justice would be punishment for the wicked. >>> >>>If he's innocent (which I doubt), his vindication would be justice. >>> >>>See how that works? >> >> Nice way to twist an answer around, I expected no less. > > You aren't making any sense. So what else is new? <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 22:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <q209ls$ptt$21@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #724011 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:38:53 -0500, Stinky Grezzeggelz Hell, Fleabitten Nazi Rapist grezzeggelled: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > <...> > >>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >>but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >>drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. > > Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a > single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard for > almost two years? You see, how it works is, first you go after the little fish -- Rick Gates, for example -- and flip them on the next higher-ups in the chain. Then you nail some of them -- Manafort, for one -- and get them to expose the misdeeds a level higher still. And then you go after one of them, e.g. Cohen, and at some point you go for a truly major player -- likely Don Jr. and/or Kushner will soon be in the hot seat. Only once you have unrolled the criminal organization from the bottom up and built a very solid case do you arrest the big fish at the very top. Don't you watch crime shows on TV? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 15:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ad58dc30490751a37@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724018 |
In article <q209ls$ptt$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:38:53 -0500, Stinky Grezzeggelz Hell, Fleabitten >Nazi Rapist grezzeggelled: > >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >>>but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >>>drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >> >> Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a >> single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard for >> almost two years? > >You see, how it works is, first you go after the little fish -- Rick >Gates, for example -- and flip them on the next higher-ups in the chain. >Then you nail some of them -- Manafort, for one -- and get them to expose >the misdeeds a level higher still. And then you go after one of them, e.g. >Cohen, and at some point you go for a truly major player -- likely Don Jr. >and/or Kushner will soon be in the hot seat. Only once you have unrolled >the criminal organization from the bottom up and built a very solid case >do you arrest the big fish at the very top. > >Don't you watch crime shows on TV? It's obvious you do, but you see this is not a crime family and you have no proof. The boys that Mooler put down did deeds on their own dime, no Trump involved. But you CNN drinkers will suck up anything to act like you're winning something.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 23:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <q20aeh$ptt$27@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #724024 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:55:46 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > In article <q209ls$ptt$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:38:53 -0500, Stinky Grezzeggelz Hell, Fleabitten >>Nazi Rapist grezzeggelled: >> >>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> <...> >>> >>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I >>>>suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the >>>>above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >>> >>> Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a >>> single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard for >>> almost two years? >> >>You see, how it works is, first you go after the little fish -- Rick >>Gates, for example -- and flip them on the next higher-ups in the chain. >>Then you nail some of them -- Manafort, for one -- and get them to >>expose the misdeeds a level higher still. And then you go after one of >>them, e.g. >>Cohen, and at some point you go for a truly major player -- likely Don >>Jr. >>and/or Kushner will soon be in the hot seat. Only once you have unrolled >>the criminal organization from the bottom up and built a very solid case >>do you arrest the big fish at the very top. >> >>Don't you watch crime shows on TV? > > It's obvious you do, but you see this is not a crime family BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhhhh *gasp* Thank you, I really needed a good belly laugh today. :) -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ad5ce392fceb82a46@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724031 |
In article <q20aeh$ptt$27@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:55:46 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > >> In article <q209ls$ptt$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >>> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:38:53 -0500, Stinky Grezzeggelz Hell, Fleabitten >>>Nazi Rapist grezzeggelled: >>> >>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> <...> >>>> >>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I >>>>>suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the >>>>>above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >>>> >>>> Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a >>>> single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard for >>>> almost two years? >>> >>>You see, how it works is, first you go after the little fish -- Rick >>>Gates, for example -- and flip them on the next higher-ups in the chain. >>>Then you nail some of them -- Manafort, for one -- and get them to >>>expose the misdeeds a level higher still. And then you go after one of >>>them, e.g. >>>Cohen, and at some point you go for a truly major player -- likely Don >>>Jr. >>>and/or Kushner will soon be in the hot seat. Only once you have unrolled >>>the criminal organization from the bottom up and built a very solid case >>>do you arrest the big fish at the very top. >>> >>>Don't you watch crime shows on TV? >> >> It's obvious you do, but you see this is not a crime family > >BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! >AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! >AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! >AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhhhh >*gasp* > >Thank you, I really needed a good belly laugh today. :) Your snippage of the part that slapped you down is noted,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 22:16 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36adb225dd4b486b99607d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #724039 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <MPG.36ad5ce392fceb82a46@news.eternal- september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says... # # In article <q20aeh$ptt$27@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid # says... # > # >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:55:46 -0700, Skeeter wrote: # > # >> In article <q209ls$ptt$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid # >> says... # >>> # >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # >>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:38:53 -0500, Stinky Grezzeggelz Hell, Fleabitten # >>>Nazi Rapist grezzeggelled: # >>> # >>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda # >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: # >>>> # >>>> <...> # >>>> # >>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I # >>>>>suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the # >>>>>above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. # >>>> # >>>> Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a # >>>> single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard for # >>>> almost two years? # >>> # >>>You see, how it works is, first you go after the little fish -- Rick # >>>Gates, for example -- and flip them on the next higher-ups in the chain. # >>>Then you nail some of them -- Manafort, for one -- and get them to # >>>expose the misdeeds a level higher still. And then you go after one of # >>>them, e.g. # >>>Cohen, and at some point you go for a truly major player -- likely Don # >>>Jr. # >>>and/or Kushner will soon be in the hot seat. Only once you have unrolled # >>>the criminal organization from the bottom up and built a very solid case # >>>do you arrest the big fish at the very top. # >>> # >>>Don't you watch crime shows on TV? # >> # >> It's obvious you do, but you see this is not a crime family # > # >BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! # >AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! # >AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! # >AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhhhh # >*gasp* # > # >Thank you, I really needed a good belly laugh today. :) # # Your snippage of the part that slapped you down is noted, It's what she always does... then she'll call YOU a coward. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web