Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #723722 > unrolled thread

How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-17 15:00 -0800
    Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-18 10:53 +1100
      Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-17 16:07 -0800
        Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-18 12:29 +1100
          Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-17 18:43 -0800
            Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:03 -0800
              Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-17 20:40 -0800
                Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 21:17 -0800
                  Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 11:02 -0800
                    Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 02:58 -0800
                      Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-20 12:41 -0800
                        Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 14:09 -0800
                          Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 23:38 +0000
                            Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-20 18:54 -0800
                            Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 20:03 -0800
                              Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-20 21:05 -0800
                                Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 21:08 -0800
                                  Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-20 21:24 -0800
                                    Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 21:31 -0800
                                      Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-20 21:59 -0800
                                        Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 03:35 -0800
                                          Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-21 13:10 -0800
                                            Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 15:54 -0800
                      Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-20 12:51 -0800
                Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-19 00:49 +0000
              Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 -0600
              Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 15:30 -0800
                Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 03:35 -0500
            Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-18 16:06 +1100
              Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-18 10:02 -0600
        Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-18 14:12 -0600
          Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Leo Sgouros <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 12:18 -0800
            Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-18 15:26 -0600
              Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:25 -0500
                Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-18 17:24 -0600
          Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 15:09 -0800
    Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 18:11 -0800
    Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-17 19:10 -0800
      Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-17 20:16 -0800
        Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-18 10:07 -0600
    Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 00:05 -0800
      Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-19 16:15 -0800
        Re: How does a prism divide up colours of white to their perspective sides? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 21:52 -0800

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#724198

Wotta dull creep!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#724218

If all colors enter from all back sides  different 
colors cannot move as a whole to a single spot leaving 
the prism. Man can't do prisms. He only says he can...

Mathematical God create gravity.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#724484

A suitable prism breaks up the light entering it into the visible spectrum. All the light emerging from the prism is thus broken up. Depending upon angles the spectrum is observable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#724124

Man doesn't know how a prism works.
He only wants to believe science has complete
understanding of nature when there is
always an unknown side of nature to every 
known mans side.


God creates gravity Eternally.


Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723871

mitchrae3323@gmail.com writes:

>> > > > No.
>> > > 
>> > > No what? No the speed of light in glass doesn't vary with frequency? No 
>> > > you don't understand? No you want to believe it's a mystery that science 
>> > > can't address, and will not accept any explanation that contradicts that 
>> > > view?
>> > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
>> > > > 
>> > > 
>> > > That follows directly from geometry if you accept the varying speed of 
>> > > light with frequency in glass.
>> > > 
>> > > Sylvia.
>> > 
>No. There is already proof in theory that light's constancy of speed
>doesn't slow down. Glass redirects it but it doesn't slow down light.

It most certainly does slow light! That is why c is defined as the
speed of light IN A VACUUM. In anything else, its speed is less.

>If the medium moves faster than light in the same direction 
>the light has to back out. When it reaches the back of the medium
>it has to both stop being slow and remain being slow.
>It can't stick to the back of the faster moving medium.
>Can you disprove that?

The speed of light in the medium is RELATIVE TO THE MEDIUM. If light
goes at 50% of c in a certain glass and a piece of that glass is moving
at 80% of c, the light is moving at 50% of c in the frame where the
glass is stationary. If you want to calculate the speed of the light
relative to the frame where the glass is moving at 80% of c, you have to
use the relativistic speed addition formula (to add 0.80c and 0.50c).

>>   That is exactly false. No extant theory of the propagation of light (including Einstein's) argues that light's velocity in vacuum is the same as in dielectric media.
>> 
>>   The differences are directly measured, you idiot.

>Demonstrate that measurement of moving light outside the atom... how can we How watch propagating light? No. It would have to be known when it was emitted. 
>How do we measure emission?
>We can't measure emission and the direction of it.
>We can't watch light propagate. No machine can see that.
>No eye can...
>It would have to be absorbed. How would science know that?
>How do we know we are dealing with the same given wave?
>That is stored... How do we know absorption happened?
>or emission? We can't watch it move either...

>If you give it a statistical average of speed
>its not the constancy of C.
>How can machines tell you light has absorbed in a particular atom
>or has been emitted by a particular atom? How could they show
>light propagating outside of the atom?

>The eye doesn't know particular light waves. Light has to be stored
>in the atoms of the eye. How can we see light inside those atoms?
>No. Science is the moron that claims it knows what it doesn't.


>>   A flat plate of any transparent material with a refractive index 
>> different from that of the vacuum (that includes all transparent
>> dielectrics) will slow down light that passes through it.

>By what measurement do you know?

Just measure the time it takes light to go from A to B in the medium.
Measure the distance it traveled. As usual, speed is distance/time.

High school level physics.

>No. Science has that wrong...

Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean science is
wrong. It just means you have some learning to do.

Anyway, different wavelengths of light move at slightly different
speeds in glass. Therefore, the glass bends some light more than other,
depending on its wavelength. By doing so, the different colors in white
light get bent differently and the white light becomes a spectrum.

This is physics/optics that has been well known for about two centuries.
More if you go by Newton's work.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723828

On 1/17/2019 10:03 PM, nuny@bid.nes wrote:
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 6:43:41 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 5:29:06 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> On 18/01/2019 11:07 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:53:45 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>> On 18/01/2019 10:00 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
>>>>>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets
>>>>>> shifted sideways
>>>>>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
>>>>>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
>>>>>> moving sideways inside?
>>>>>
>>>>> The speed of light in glass varies[*] according to the frequency, so the
>>>>> angle that light gets turned through on entering the glass also varies
>>>>> according to frequency. The splitting into colours is a direct
>>>>> consequence of this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> No what? No the speed of light in glass doesn't vary with frequency? No 
>>> you don't understand? No you want to believe it's a mystery that science 
>>> can't address, and will not accept any explanation that contradicts that 
>>> view?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
>>>>
>>>
>>> That follows directly from geometry if you accept the varying speed of 
>>> light with frequency in glass.
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>
>> No. There is already proof in theory that light's constancy of speed
>> doesn't slow down. Glass redirects it but it doesn't slow down light.
> 
>   That is exactly false. No extant theory of the propagation of light (including Einstein's) argues that light's velocity in vacuum is the same as in dielectric media.
> 
>   The differences are directly measured, you idiot.
> 
>   A flat plate of any transparent material with a refractive index different from that of the vacuum (that includes all transparent dielectrics) will slow down light that passes through it.
> 
>   That's how refractive index is DEFINED, you idiot.
> 
>> If glass moves faster than slow light in the same direction
>> it will back out to the very back of the medium. But
>> that is the proof that light is always a constant speed instead.
>> It would have to speed back up and slow back down
>> both together... and that is clearly nonsense.
>> You can't have it both ways science...
> 
>   Yes, light slows down upon entering a transparent dielectric, then speeds back up upon exiting it.
> 
>   The speed of light is constant IN A GIVEN MEDIUM.
> 
>   Your babble is contradicted by measurement. The universe DOES NOT CARE what you consider "nonsense".
>  
>> The Nobel committee accepts this disproof revealing that
>> light's constancy C speed has no exception theoretically now...
>> Einstein is validated more. If you didn't believe him
>> about order you are not doing science. You just want
>> to think you are... take a correction that order is
>> what science is about... not probability (statistical averages)
>> or chaos...
> 
>   Still more babble, but now it has no bearing on the refraction of light.
> 
>> Mathematical God creates gravitational central order.
> 
>   In what sort of temple do you worship your mathematical god?
> 
> 
>   Dr. HotSalt
> 

His Math God only does addition.  Not subtraction, not multiplication,
not division. Those belong to other Gods.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#724480

On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 8:03:24 PM UTC-8, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 6:43:41 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 5:29:06 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
> > > On 18/01/2019 11:07 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:53:45 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
> > > >> On 18/01/2019 10:00 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
> > > >>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets
> > > >>> shifted sideways
> > > >>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
> > > >>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
> > > >>> moving sideways inside?
> > > >>
> > > >> The speed of light in glass varies[*] according to the frequency, so the
> > > >> angle that light gets turned through on entering the glass also varies
> > > >> according to frequency. The splitting into colours is a direct
> > > >> consequence of this.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > No.
> > > 
> > > No what? No the speed of light in glass doesn't vary with frequency? No 
> > > you don't understand? No you want to believe it's a mystery that science 
> > > can't address, and will not accept any explanation that contradicts that 
> > > view?
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > That follows directly from geometry if you accept the varying speed of 
> > > light with frequency in glass.
> > > 
> > > Sylvia.
> > 
> > No. There is already proof in theory that light's constancy of speed
> > doesn't slow down. Glass redirects it but it doesn't slow down light.
> 
>   That is exactly false. No extant theory of the propagation of light (including Einstein's) argues that light's velocity in vacuum is the same as in dielectric media.
> 
>   The differences are directly measured, you idiot.
> 
>   A flat plate of any transparent material with a refractive index different from that of the vacuum (that includes all transparent dielectrics) will slow down light that passes through it.
> 
>   That's how refractive index is DEFINED, you idiot.
> 
> > If glass moves faster than slow light in the same direction
> > it will back out to the very back of the medium. But
> > that is the proof that light is always a constant speed instead.
> > It would have to speed back up and slow back down
> > both together... and that is clearly nonsense.
> > You can't have it both ways science...
> 
>   Yes, light slows down upon entering a transparent dielectric, then speeds back up upon exiting it.
> 
>   The speed of light is constant IN A GIVEN MEDIUM.
> 
>   Your babble is contradicted by measurement. The universe DOES NOT CARE what you consider "nonsense".
>  
> > The Nobel committee accepts this disproof revealing that
> > light's constancy C speed has no exception theoretically now...
> > Einstein is validated more. If you didn't believe him
> > about order you are not doing science. You just want
> > to think you are... take a correction that order is
> > what science is about... not probability (statistical averages)
> > or chaos...
> 
>   Still more babble, but now it has no bearing on the refraction of light.
> 
> > Mathematical God creates gravitational central order.
> 
>   In what sort of temple do you worship your mathematical god?
> 
> 
>   Dr. HotSalt

If photons slowed down it begs this question I've been asking here for 26 years."Where does it get the energy to get back to c? What still no answer Ho Hum .Photons go at c always.I have posted many times on my theory covering this.Time imperial thinkers put on their thinking cap.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#724531

On 1/23/2019 6:30 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 8:03:24 PM UTC-8, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 6:43:41 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 5:29:06 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>> On 18/01/2019 11:07 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:53:45 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/01/2019 10:00 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
>>>>>>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets
>>>>>>> shifted sideways
>>>>>>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
>>>>>>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
>>>>>>> moving sideways inside?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The speed of light in glass varies[*] according to the frequency, so the
>>>>>> angle that light gets turned through on entering the glass also varies
>>>>>> according to frequency. The splitting into colours is a direct
>>>>>> consequence of this.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> No what? No the speed of light in glass doesn't vary with frequency? No
>>>> you don't understand? No you want to believe it's a mystery that science
>>>> can't address, and will not accept any explanation that contradicts that
>>>> view?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That follows directly from geometry if you accept the varying speed of
>>>> light with frequency in glass.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> No. There is already proof in theory that light's constancy of speed
>>> doesn't slow down. Glass redirects it but it doesn't slow down light.
>>
>>    That is exactly false. No extant theory of the propagation of light (including Einstein's) argues that light's velocity in vacuum is the same as in dielectric media.
>>
>>    The differences are directly measured, you idiot.
>>
>>    A flat plate of any transparent material with a refractive index different from that of the vacuum (that includes all transparent dielectrics) will slow down light that passes through it.
>>
>>    That's how refractive index is DEFINED, you idiot.
>>
>>> If glass moves faster than slow light in the same direction
>>> it will back out to the very back of the medium. But
>>> that is the proof that light is always a constant speed instead.
>>> It would have to speed back up and slow back down
>>> both together... and that is clearly nonsense.
>>> You can't have it both ways science...
>>
>>    Yes, light slows down upon entering a transparent dielectric, then speeds back up upon exiting it.
>>
>>    The speed of light is constant IN A GIVEN MEDIUM.
>>
>>    Your babble is contradicted by measurement. The universe DOES NOT CARE what you consider "nonsense".
>>   
>>> The Nobel committee accepts this disproof revealing that
>>> light's constancy C speed has no exception theoretically now...
>>> Einstein is validated more. If you didn't believe him
>>> about order you are not doing science. You just want
>>> to think you are... take a correction that order is
>>> what science is about... not probability (statistical averages)
>>> or chaos...
>>
>>    Still more babble, but now it has no bearing on the refraction of light.
>>
>>> Mathematical God creates gravitational central order.
>>
>>    In what sort of temple do you worship your mathematical god?
>>
>>
>>    Dr. HotSalt
> 
> If photons slowed down it begs this question I've been asking here for 26 years."Where does it get the energy to get back to c? What still no answer Ho Hum .Photons go at c always.I have posted many times on my theory covering this.Time imperial thinkers put on their thinking cap.Bert
> 
You are the dumbest fuck on the planet. Just shut up and quit your drooling.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723774

On 18/01/2019 1:43 pm, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 5:29:06 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 18/01/2019 11:07 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:53:45 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>> On 18/01/2019 10:00 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
>>>>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets shifted sideways
>>>>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
>>>>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
>>>>> moving sideways inside?
>>>>
>>>> The speed of light in glass varies[*] according to the frequency, so the
>>>> angle that light gets turned through on entering the glass also varies
>>>> according to frequency. The splitting into colours is a direct
>>>> consequence of this.
>>>
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> No what? No the speed of light in glass doesn't vary with frequency? No
>> you don't understand? No you want to believe it's a mystery that science
>> can't address, and will not accept any explanation that contradicts that
>> view?
>>
>>>
>>> How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
>>>
>>
>> That follows directly from geometry if you accept the varying speed of
>> light with frequency in glass.
>>
>> Sylvia.
> 
> No. There is already proof in theory that light's constancy of speed
> doesn't slow down. Glass redirects it but it doesn't slow down light.

Measuring the speed of light in glass is an undergraduate level 
experiment, which can be done by doing a direct measurement of the 
transit time of a pulse of light through a suitable length optical fibre 
by means of an oscilloscope. If light didn't slow down in glass, this 
would definitely have been noticed.

I don't understand why you make claims that are so easily refuted.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723791

On 1/17/2019 11:06 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 18/01/2019 1:43 pm, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 5:29:06 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> On 18/01/2019 11:07 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:53:45 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>> On 18/01/2019 10:00 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
>>>>>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets
>>>>>> shifted sideways
>>>>>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
>>>>>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
>>>>>> moving sideways inside?
>>>>>
>>>>> The speed of light in glass varies[*] according to the frequency,
>>>>> so the
>>>>> angle that light gets turned through on entering the glass also varies
>>>>> according to frequency. The splitting into colours is a direct
>>>>> consequence of this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> No what? No the speed of light in glass doesn't vary with frequency? No
>>> you don't understand? No you want to believe it's a mystery that science
>>> can't address, and will not accept any explanation that contradicts that
>>> view?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
>>>>
>>>
>>> That follows directly from geometry if you accept the varying speed of
>>> light with frequency in glass.
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>
>> No. There is already proof in theory that light's constancy of speed
>> doesn't slow down. Glass redirects it but it doesn't slow down light.
> 
> Measuring the speed of light in glass is an undergraduate level
> experiment, which can be done by doing a direct measurement of the
> transit time of a pulse of light through a suitable length optical fibre
> by means of an oscilloscope. If light didn't slow down in glass, this
> would definitely have been noticed.
> 
> I don't understand why you make claims that are so easily refuted.
> 
> Sylvia.


light travels about 1 foot in a nanosecond in free space or open air.
in fiber or materials it slows down  to 70% or less.

So these measurments are easy with an O scope

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723810

On 1/17/2019 6:07 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:53:45 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 18/01/2019 10:00 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
>>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets shifted sideways
>>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
>>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
>>> moving sideways inside?
>>
>> The speed of light in glass varies[*] according to the frequency, so the 
>> angle that light gets turned through on entering the glass also varies 
>> according to frequency. The splitting into colours is a direct 
>> consequence of this.
> 
> 
> No.
> 
> How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
> 
>>
>>>
>>> No. Science doesn't know how a prism works.
>>> Only that it does. But science always wants a lie.
>>
>> Seems to me that science more than adequately addresses the question.
> 
> That is your scientific bigotry. Science has never been  accurate
> and has never admitted to that.

not true, all glass does that, including lens in camera, google
Achromatic lens, design is all based upon established science.
the Science is very exact, well proven too.

Seems like you personally don't know it Mitch, but there is a lot of
information on it on line.


 It is not worth its salt Sylvia.
> Mathematical God creates gravitation.

so which God takes care of Laundry ?   Laundry God ?

> 
> Mitchell Raemsch
> 
>>
>> Sylvia.
>>
>> [*] This is actually a nuisance when it comes to optical fibres, because 
>> it causes pulse spreading, and steps need to be taken to address it.
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723811

On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 2:12:36 PM UTC-6, Sergi o wrote:
> On 1/17/2019 6:07 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:53:45 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
> >> On 18/01/2019 10:00 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
> >>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets shifted sideways
> >>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
> >>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
> >>> moving sideways inside?
> >>
> >> The speed of light in glass varies[*] according to the frequency, so the 
> >> angle that light gets turned through on entering the glass also varies 
> >> according to frequency. The splitting into colours is a direct 
> >> consequence of this.
> > 
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
> > 
> >>
> >>>
> >>> No. Science doesn't know how a prism works.
> >>> Only that it does. But science always wants a lie.
> >>
> >> Seems to me that science more than adequately addresses the question.
> > 
> > That is your scientific bigotry. Science has never been  accurate
> > and has never admitted to that.
> 
> not true, all glass does that, including lens in camera, google
> Achromatic lens, design is all based upon established science.
> the Science is very exact, well proven too.
> 
> Seems like you personally don't know it Mitch, but there is a lot of
> information on it on line.
> 
> 
>  It is not worth its salt Sylvia.
> > Mathematical God creates gravitation.
> 
> so which God takes care of Laundry ?   Laundry God ?
> 


Good question, because I still have that sock problem, and I would like to know whom to address.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723827

On 1/18/2019 2:18 PM, Leo Sgouros wrote:
> On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 2:12:36 PM UTC-6, Sergi o wrote:
>> On 1/17/2019 6:07 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:53:45 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>> On 18/01/2019 10:00 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
>>>>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets shifted sideways
>>>>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
>>>>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
>>>>> moving sideways inside?
>>>>
>>>> The speed of light in glass varies[*] according to the frequency, so the 
>>>> angle that light gets turned through on entering the glass also varies 
>>>> according to frequency. The splitting into colours is a direct 
>>>> consequence of this.
>>>
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No. Science doesn't know how a prism works.
>>>>> Only that it does. But science always wants a lie.
>>>>
>>>> Seems to me that science more than adequately addresses the question.
>>>
>>> That is your scientific bigotry. Science has never been  accurate
>>> and has never admitted to that.
>>
>> not true, all glass does that, including lens in camera, google
>> Achromatic lens, design is all based upon established science.
>> the Science is very exact, well proven too.
>>
>> Seems like you personally don't know it Mitch, but there is a lot of
>> information on it on line.
>>
>>
>>  It is not worth its salt Sylvia.
>>> Mathematical God creates gravitation.
>>
>> so which God takes care of Laundry ?   Laundry God ?
>>
> 
> 
> Good question, because I still have that sock problem, and I would like to know whom to address.
> 

did you know that the Chinese never wash socks with their clothes ?
it keeps foot fungus from spreading into their clothes.
so just do a load of socks only, and use  1/2 cup of vinegar.
   -Zod, the Laundry God

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723851

On 1/18/2019 4:26 PM, Sergi o wrote:
> On 1/18/2019 2:18 PM, Leo Sgouros wrote:
>> On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 2:12:36 PM UTC-6, Sergi o wrote:
>>> On 1/17/2019 6:07 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:53:45 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>> On 18/01/2019 10:00 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
>>>>>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets shifted sideways
>>>>>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
>>>>>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
>>>>>> moving sideways inside?
>>>>>
>>>>> The speed of light in glass varies[*] according to the frequency, so the
>>>>> angle that light gets turned through on entering the glass also varies
>>>>> according to frequency. The splitting into colours is a direct
>>>>> consequence of this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. Science doesn't know how a prism works.
>>>>>> Only that it does. But science always wants a lie.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems to me that science more than adequately addresses the question.
>>>>
>>>> That is your scientific bigotry. Science has never been  accurate
>>>> and has never admitted to that.
>>>
>>> not true, all glass does that, including lens in camera, google
>>> Achromatic lens, design is all based upon established science.
>>> the Science is very exact, well proven too.
>>>
>>> Seems like you personally don't know it Mitch, but there is a lot of
>>> information on it on line.
>>>
>>>
>>>   It is not worth its salt Sylvia.
>>>> Mathematical God creates gravitation.
>>>
>>> so which God takes care of Laundry ?   Laundry God ?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Good question, because I still have that sock problem, and I would like to know whom to address.
>>
> 
> did you know that the Chinese never wash socks with their clothes ?
> it keeps foot fungus from spreading into their clothes.
> so just do a load of socks only, and use  1/2 cup of vinegar.
>     -Zod, the Laundry God

Chinese Foot Fungus!!!!  EEEEW!!!!

And NOW you tell me after I've been doing loads of clothes containing 
dirty socks and pillowcases!

Aren't you Gods supposed to be all-knowing to keep me out of trouble?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723861

On 1/18/2019 4:25 PM, benj wrote:
> On 1/18/2019 4:26 PM, Sergi o wrote:
>> On 1/18/2019 2:18 PM, Leo Sgouros wrote:
>>> On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 2:12:36 PM UTC-6, Sergi o wrote:
>>>> On 1/17/2019 6:07 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:53:45 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/01/2019 10:00 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
>>>>>>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets
>>>>>>> shifted sideways
>>>>>>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways
>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
>>>>>>> moving sideways inside?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The speed of light in glass varies[*] according to the frequency,
>>>>>> so the
>>>>>> angle that light gets turned through on entering the glass also
>>>>>> varies
>>>>>> according to frequency. The splitting into colours is a direct
>>>>>> consequence of this.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>>
>>>>> How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No. Science doesn't know how a prism works.
>>>>>>> Only that it does. But science always wants a lie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems to me that science more than adequately addresses the question.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is your scientific bigotry. Science has never been  accurate
>>>>> and has never admitted to that.
>>>>
>>>> not true, all glass does that, including lens in camera, google
>>>> Achromatic lens, design is all based upon established science.
>>>> the Science is very exact, well proven too.
>>>>
>>>> Seems like you personally don't know it Mitch, but there is a lot of
>>>> information on it on line.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   It is not worth its salt Sylvia.
>>>>> Mathematical God creates gravitation.
>>>>
>>>> so which God takes care of Laundry ?   Laundry God ?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Good question, because I still have that sock problem, and I would
>>> like to know whom to address.
>>>
>>
>> did you know that the Chinese never wash socks with their clothes ?
>> it keeps foot fungus from spreading into their clothes.
>> so just do a load of socks only, and use  1/2 cup of vinegar.
>>     -Zod, the Laundry God
> 
> Chinese Foot Fungus!!!!  EEEEW!!!!
> 
> And NOW you tell me after I've been doing loads of clothes containing
> dirty socks and pillowcases!
> 
> Aren't you Gods supposed to be all-knowing to keep me out of trouble?
> 
> 

yep, that isn't jock itch anymore, its CFF!

all because socks were washed with the clothes!

(all those wet articles of clothes together, sharing mycelium)

and you can add a few things that will kill off some of the fungus,
detergent wont do it, vinigar (kills 85%), baking soda, washing soda,
clorax (on Whites)

Subscribe by sending $4.99 to makeZODrich@paypal.com, the pre-paid God

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723858

On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 12:12:36 PM UTC-8, Sergi o wrote:
> On 1/17/2019 6:07 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:53:45 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
> >> On 18/01/2019 10:00 am, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
> >>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets shifted sideways
> >>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
> >>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
> >>> moving sideways inside?
> >>
> >> The speed of light in glass varies[*] according to the frequency, so the 
> >> angle that light gets turned through on entering the glass also varies 
> >> according to frequency. The splitting into colours is a direct 
> >> consequence of this.
> > 
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > How does it all go to the right place Sylvia?
> > 
> >>
> >>>
> >>> No. Science doesn't know how a prism works.
> >>> Only that it does. But science always wants a lie.
> >>
> >> Seems to me that science more than adequately addresses the question.
> > 
> > That is your scientific bigotry. Science has never been  accurate
> > and has never admitted to that.
> 
> not true, all glass does that, including lens in camera, google
> Achromatic lens, design is all based upon established science.
> the Science is very exact, well proven too.


Not at all.

> 
> Seems like you personally don't know it Mitch, but there is a lot of
> information on it on line.
> 
> 
>  It is not worth its salt Sylvia.
> > Mathematical God creates gravitation.
> 
> so which God takes care of Laundry ?   Laundry God ?
> 
> > 
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> > 
> >>
> >> Sylvia.
> >>
> >> [*] This is actually a nuisance when it comes to optical fibres, because 
> >> it causes pulse spreading, and steps need to be taken to address it.
> >

Science has never been accurate...
It only has its statistics...
It stays in ignorance by lying to itself.
Mathematical God creates gravitation.


Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723740

On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 1:00:53 PM UTC-10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets shifted sideways
> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
> moving sideways inside?
> 
> No. Science doesn't know how a prism works.
> Only that it does. But science always wants a lie.
> 
> Mathematical God creates gravitation.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch

Consider a prism of Barium Titanate with a 
refractive index of 2.4 and a prism of glass
with n=1.5.

The colors bend at different angles because
the molecules have bonds that are using wavefunctions
that are related to photons. The light is made
from fragments of bonds. The momentum from
nuclei multiplies the photon velocity to
make a continuous variation in the angle
a photon is emitted at. The incoming photon
interacts with a nucleus an electrons and a new
photon departs in a new direction that depends on
materials and nuclei.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723755

On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:00:53 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets shifted sideways
> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
> moving sideways inside?
> 
> No. Science doesn't know how a prism works.
> Only that it does. But science always wants a lie.
> 
> Mathematical God creates gravitation.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch

Too stupid to research this for yourself, Mitch?

https://tinyurl.com/ybny5xdc

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723766

On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 7:10:45 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:00:53 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
> > White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets shifted sideways
> > displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
> > right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
> > moving sideways inside?
> > 
> > No. Science doesn't know how a prism works.
> > Only that it does. But science always wants a lie.
> > 
> > Mathematical God creates gravitation.
> > 
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> Too stupid to research this for yourself, Mitch?
> 
> https://tinyurl.com/ybny5xdc

Go back and study. Look at your sheepskins on the wall Pnut.
You need education not me. 
Mathematical God creates gravitation.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723792

On 1/17/2019 10:16 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 7:10:45 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 3:00:53 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> If they have to move whole to one side coming out...?
>>> White light enters the whole back of the prism and somehow gets shifted sideways
>>> displaying the spectrum. How does colour gets separated sideways to a
>>> right place coming out? How would slowdown accomplish that light
>>> moving sideways inside?
>>>
>>> No. Science doesn't know how a prism works.
>>> Only that it does. But science always wants a lie.
>>>
>>> Mathematical God creates gravitation.
>>>
>>> Mitchell Raemsch
>>
>> Too stupid to research this for yourself, Mitch?
>>
>> https://tinyurl.com/ybny5xdc
> 
> Go back and study. Look at your sheepskins on the wall Pnut.
> You need education not me. 
> Mathematical God creates gravitation.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch
> 

  "Where did your Mathematical God go to school ?", asks ZOD.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web