Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #723573 > unrolled thread

McGinn is right 7.7% of the time, and lies 92.3% of the time

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  McGinn is right 7.7% of the time, and lies 92.3% of the time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 10:39 -0600
    Re: McGinn is right 7.7% of the time, and lies 92.3% of the time eSrgio <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 12:34 -0600
    Re: McGinn is right 7.7% of the time, and lies 92.3% of the time 🔘 Finch Barracuda 🔘 <fbe@derig.pa> - 2019-01-17 18:22 +0000
      Re: McGinn is right 7.7% of the time, and lies 92.3% of the time Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-17 13:01 -0600
      Re: McGinn is right 7.7% of the time, and lies 92.3% of the time Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-18 12:42 +1100
        Re: McGinn is right 7.7% of the time, and lies 92.3% of the time "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 18:22 -0800

#723573 — McGinn is right 7.7% of the time, and lies 92.3% of the time

[Analysis provided by the JM/CD WaterVaporPreservationSociety@WTF.RU?]

from the thread on Dalton's Law, McGinn's statements;


LIES;

1.  BTW, I don't know if I mentioned this before. But I am an
atmospheric physicist.

2.  Obviously, you have very little understanding of any of this.

3.  So this is all child's play to me.

4. Calculation is childs play.  It's the higher level thinking that is
lacking.

5.  He probably smells better than you too.

6.  If McGinn is correct (and I am 100% sure he is--afterall, I am his
sock puppet ;)

7.  McGinn is right.

8.  You have made a huge conceptual error.

9.  Dalton's Law doesn't have anything to do with H2O, you idiot

10  There is no such thing as "the stable state of water".

11. If we knew that the h2o that is in moist air is gaseous then what
you are saying would be undeniable. Unfortunately (for you) the best
evidence indicates that that is impossible. It is liquid nanodroplets.

12  Dalton's is well understood.  (NOT BY MCGINN)


TRUE

13  Well, unfortunately Denk agrees with me.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#723583

On 1/16/2019 10:39 AM, Sergio wrote:
> [Analysis provided by the JM/CD WaterVaporPreservationSociety@WTF.RU?]
> 
> from the thread on Dalton's Law, McGinn's statements;
> 
> 
> LIES;
> 
> 1.  BTW, I don't know if I mentioned this before. But I am an
> atmospheric physicist.
> 
> 2.  Obviously, you have very little understanding of any of this.
> 
> 3.  So this is all child's play to me.
> 
> 4. Calculation is childs play.  It's the higher level thinking that is
> lacking.
> 
> 5.  He probably smells better than you too.
> 
> 6.  If McGinn is correct (and I am 100% sure he is--afterall, I am his
> sock puppet ;)
> 
> 7.  McGinn is right.
> 
> 8.  You have made a huge conceptual error.
> 
> 9.  Dalton's Law doesn't have anything to do with H2O, you idiot
> 
> 10  There is no such thing as "the stable state of water".
> 
> 11. If we knew that the h2o that is in moist air is gaseous then what
> you are saying would be undeniable. Unfortunately (for you) the best
> evidence indicates that that is impossible. It is liquid nanodroplets.
> 
> 12  Dalton's is well understood.  (NOT BY MCGINN)
> 
> 
> TRUE
> 
> 13  Well, unfortunately Denk agrees with me.
> 
> 

someone is forging my posts....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723687

Sergio wrote:

> [Analysis provided by the JM/CD WaterVaporPreservationSociety@WTF.RU?]
> from the thread on Dalton's Law, McGinn's statements;
> LIES;
> 1. BTW, I don't know if I mentioned this before. But I am an atmospheric
> physicist.

You guys are not even amateurs in physics. 
Arduino is not physics.
I know a physicist when I see one

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723689

On 1/17/2019 12:22 PM, 🔘 Finch Barracuda 🔘 wrote:
> Sergio wrote:
> 
>> [Analysis provided by the JM/CD WaterVaporPreservationSociety@WTF.RU?]
>> from the thread on Dalton's Law, McGinn's statements;
>> LIES;
>> 1. BTW, I don't know if I mentioned this before. But I am an atmospheric
>> physicist.
> 
> You guys are not even amateurs in physics. 
> Arduino is not physics.
> I know a physicist when I see one
> 

McGinn/Denk, the self proclaimed Atmosperic Psychoticist;

https://images.halloweencostumes.com/products/39933/1-1/al-bark-einstein-pet-costume.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723739

On 18/01/2019 5:22 am, 🔘 Finch Barracuda 🔘 wrote:
> Sergio wrote:
> 
>> [Analysis provided by the JM/CD WaterVaporPreservationSociety@WTF.RU?]
>> from the thread on Dalton's Law, McGinn's statements;
>> LIES;
>> 1. BTW, I don't know if I mentioned this before. But I am an atmospheric
>> physicist.
> 
> You guys are not even amateurs in physics.
> Arduino is not physics.
> I know a physicist when I see one
>

Re the subject line, I think you give McGinn too much credit, because if 
he's lying it means he knows that what he says is untrue. I don't think 
that's the case - I think he believes what he says.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#723741

On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 5:43:00 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 18/01/2019 5:22 am, 🔘 Finch Barracuda 🔘 wrote:
> > Sergio wrote:
> > 
> >> [Analysis provided by the JM/CD WaterVaporPreservationSociety@WTF.RU?]
> >> from the thread on Dalton's Law, McGinn's statements;
> >> LIES;
> >> 1. BTW, I don't know if I mentioned this before. But I am an atmospheric
> >> physicist.
> > 
> > You guys are not even amateurs in physics.
> > Arduino is not physics.
> > I know a physicist when I see one
> >
> 
> Re the subject line, I think you give McGinn too much credit, because if 
> he's lying it means he knows that what he says is untrue. I don't think 
> that's the case - I think he believes what he says.
> 
> Sylvia.

He does some good by making us think along the path of reality.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web