Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #722281 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-05 17:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-01-08 10:00 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 150 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-05 17:22 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-05 22:49 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 16:12 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-05 23:25 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:49 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-05 21:15 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:29 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2019-01-06 10:50 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 08:57 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:25 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:25 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-06 10:35 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-06 10:52 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:58 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-06 12:00 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-06 10:04 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-05 23:22 -0600
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 02:09 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:26 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 05:49 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 06:34 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 17:57 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 11:16 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:25 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 11:30 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:34 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 20:27 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 13:39 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 13:57 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 14:01 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:19 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 14:36 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:40 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 14:43 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:55 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 15:53 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:55 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 16:03 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:23 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-06 18:31 -0600
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:45 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-06 18:28 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 21:36 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:00 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 23:03 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:17 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 23:43 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:54 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 00:13 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:20 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 17:32 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 00:47 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:07 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 02:32 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:50 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 04:41 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 06:07 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 18:46 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 19:49 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 20:38 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 13:52 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 14:02 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 14:08 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-07 16:17 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 14:22 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:13 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-07 17:41 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 15:45 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-07 17:58 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 16:03 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:09 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:17 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-07 18:30 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:37 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:18 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2019-01-07 15:22 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:14 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-07 16:28 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-07 19:10 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 22:05 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-07 16:25 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-07 20:44 -0600
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 19:54 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-08 09:49 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 08:15 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 22:29 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 15:37 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:18 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-07 20:32 -0600
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-08 09:50 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:55 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:02 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:21 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 00:26 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 01:04 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:23 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:35 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 02:35 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:50 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 04:43 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 06:07 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 18:47 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 19:49 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 20:40 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 13:53 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-07 19:03 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 14:01 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 22:31 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 15:51 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:06 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 16:09 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:11 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:19 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 15:49 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 15:07 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:03 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 14:36 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:41 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 14:42 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:53 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 15:52 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:57 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 16:02 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:03 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 16:06 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:24 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 17:28 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:31 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 00:48 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 21:34 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-09 06:48 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-09 18:04 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-09 06:38 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-09 09:48 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 20:52 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 14:08 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-06 13:11 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 14:12 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-07 04:47 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 21:32 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-06 13:03 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:49 -0500
Kensi's religion isn't that large. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-05 22:54 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-06 13:07 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:04 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-08 10:00 -0500
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 22:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g9i0pjFev54U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722557 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2019-01-07 2:02 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 1/7/19 1:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 5:20 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 5:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Education. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> More puerile drivel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than >>>>>>>>>>>>>> outright killing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is wealth. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite >>>>>>>>>>>>> telling. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Once again you show that you are unable to read. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I >>>>>>>>>>>> said that >>>>>>>>>>>> education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You labeled education as "puerile drivel" and then said your >>>>>>>>>>> suggestion >>>>>>>>>>> would be one of the results of education. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In other words, you are just trolling. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You also ignored the fact that education leads not only to >>>>>>>>>>> greater >>>>>>>>>>> wealth but also to people being more liberal. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In response Jimp pulled a Klaus. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In response, jimp showed you are a liar. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Quote the lie. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here you go: "You labeled education as "puerile drivel" >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Which, in the context of that quote, you did. >>>>> Illogical nonsense. >>>> >>>> I never said your comment made sense. >>>>> >>>>> I said that education as a method to reduce population is puerile >>>>> drivel. >>>> >>>> That was the context. Yes. And then you listed things education helps >>>> bring >>>> as important in that context. >>>> >>>> And now you are going in circles. >>> >>> You are one confused, illogical, illiterate twit. >>> >>> >> Are you speaking to zombies or dead people? >> > dead zombies > Those are among my favorite kinds.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 16:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ZdRYD.2744$Oc4.768@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #722557 |
On 1/7/2019 2:08 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-07 2:02 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 1/7/19 1:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In response, jimp showed you are a liar. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Quote the lie. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here you go: "You labeled education as "puerile drivel" >>>>>> >>>>>> Which, in the context of that quote, you did. >>>>> Illogical nonsense. >>>> >>>> I never said your comment made sense. >>>>> >>>>> I said that education as a method to reduce population is puerile >>>>> drivel. >>>> >>>> That was the context. Yes. And then you listed things education >>>> helps bring >>>> as important in that context. >>>> >>>> And now you are going in circles. >>> >>> You are one confused, illogical, illiterate twit. >>> >> Are you speaking to zombies or dead people? >> > dead zombies So, Democrats?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 20:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q112qo$1328$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #722609 |
On 1/7/2019 5:25 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 1/7/2019 2:08 PM, % wrote: >> On 2019-01-07 2:02 p.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 1/7/19 1:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In response, jimp showed you are a liar. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Quote the lie. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here you go: "You labeled education as "puerile drivel" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which, in the context of that quote, you did. >>>>>> Illogical nonsense. >>>>> >>>>> I never said your comment made sense. >>>>>> >>>>>> I said that education as a method to reduce population is puerile >>>>>> drivel. >>>>> >>>>> That was the context. Yes. And then you listed things education >>>>> helps bring >>>>> as important in that context. >>>>> >>>>> And now you are going in circles. >>>> >>>> You are one confused, illogical, illiterate twit. >>>> >>> Are you speaking to zombies or dead people? >>> >> dead zombies > > So, Democrats? > dems are walking dead zombies look at their ages, Nancy Pelosi 78, Patrick Leahy 78, Dianne Feinstein 85, Charles Schumer 69, Joe Biden 75, Bernie Sanders 76 Elizabeth Warren 68 Hillary Clinton 71 average Democrat was 61.0 years old
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 19:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9iho0Fib9eU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722633 |
On 1/7/19 7:44 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 1/7/2019 5:25 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 1/7/2019 2:08 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-01-07 2:02 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/7/19 1:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In response, jimp showed you are a liar. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Quote the lie. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here you go: "You labeled education as "puerile drivel" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which, in the context of that quote, you did. >>>>>>> Illogical nonsense. >>>>>> >>>>>> I never said your comment made sense. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I said that education as a method to reduce population is puerile >>>>>>> drivel. >>>>>> >>>>>> That was the context. Yes. And then you listed things education >>>>>> helps bring >>>>>> as important in that context. >>>>>> >>>>>> And now you are going in circles. >>>>> >>>>> You are one confused, illogical, illiterate twit. >>>>> >>>> Are you speaking to zombies or dead people? >>>> >>> dead zombies >> >> So, Democrats? >> > > dems are walking dead zombies look at their ages, > > Nancy Pelosi 78, > Patrick Leahy 78, > Dianne Feinstein 85, > Charles Schumer 69, > Joe Biden 75, > Bernie Sanders 76 > Elizabeth Warren 68 > Hillary Clinton 71 > average Democrat was 61.0 years old > The fact you think those are ALL the Democrats in the country is rather amazing. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 09:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <i1e93e56dsnirludocfqe0p922vn75em11@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #722636 |
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 19:54:56 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: <...> >The fact you think those are ALL the Democrats in the country is rather >amazing. The *fact* that you think at all is but a theory. LOL! -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 08:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9jt4hFreesU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722672 |
On 1/8/19 7:49 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 19:54:56 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > <...> >>> dems are walking dead zombies look at their ages, >>> >>> Nancy Pelosi 78, >>> Patrick Leahy 78, >>> Dianne Feinstein 85, >>> Charles Schumer 69, >>> Joe Biden 75, >>> Bernie Sanders 76 >>> Elizabeth Warren 68 >>> Hillary Clinton 71 >>> average Democrat was 61.0 years old >> >> The fact you think those are ALL the Democrats in the country is rather >> amazing. > > The *fact* that you think at all is but a theory. > > LOL! > Your anger at having your friend's error pointed out is misdirected. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 22:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <le0dgf-o2t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #722555 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: <snip> > Are you speaking to zombies or dead people? It is hard to tell from your babbling, puerile posts, but most likely it is just a smug adolescent in dire need of English 101. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 15:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bst9ro.a4d.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #722579 |
On 2019-01-07 3:29 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > <snip> > >> Are you speaking to zombies or dead people? > > It is hard to tell from your babbling, puerile posts, but most likely > it is just a smug adolescent in dire need of English 101. > this is a non union news group , there is no seniority , how ever long you've been here don't man shit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 16:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9i52gFfm05U12@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722581 |
On 1/7/19 3:37 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-07 3:29 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>> Are you speaking to zombies or dead people? >> >> It is hard to tell from your babbling, puerile posts, but most likely >> it is just a smug adolescent in dire need of English 101. >> > this is a non union news group , > there is no seniority , > how ever long you've been here don't man shit I think he likes me. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 16:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9i53pFfm05U13@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722579 |
On 1/7/19 3:29 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > <snip> > >> Are you speaking to zombies or dead people? > > It is hard to tell from your babbling, puerile posts, but most likely > it is just a smug adolescent in dire need of English 101. > You flirt in a very immature way... but even if you improved your game I am not interested. Thanks though... I suppose I should be flattered. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 20:32 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q1124l$1024$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #722547 |
On 1/7/2019 2:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 5:20 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 5:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Education.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> More puerile drivel.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing,
>>>>>>>>>>>> is wealth.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Once again you show that you are unable to read.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that
>>>>>>>>>> education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You labeled education as "puerile drivel" and then said your suggestion
>>>>>>>>> would be one of the results of education.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In other words, you are just trolling.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You also ignored the fact that education leads not only to greater
>>>>>>>>> wealth but also to people being more liberal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In response Jimp pulled a Klaus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In response, jimp showed you are a liar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quote the lie.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here you go: "You labeled education as "puerile drivel"
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Which, in the context of that quote, you did.
>>>
>>> Illogical nonsense.
>>
>> I never said your comment made sense.
>>>
>>> I said that education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel.
>>
>> That was the context. Yes. And then you listed things education helps bring
>> as important in that context.
>>
>> And now you are going in circles.
>
> You are one confused, illogical, illiterate twit.
>
>
Snit rhymes with twit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 09:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <35e93epoqcc0v1do894n8vd9b60f4na15h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #722631 |
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 20:32:54 -0600, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: <...> > Snit rhymes with twit. And, shit. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 16:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsqq3a.7ut.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #722434 |
On 2019-01-06 4:43 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/6/19 4:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/6/19 1:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <snip> >>>>> >>>>>>> Less people, less problem. control the population. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Certainly a good thing to do... but would not stop the problem (unless >>>>>> you take it to an extreme). >>>>> >>>>> What actions do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating humans? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Less global harm. Less human suffering (overall and per capita). >>> >>> Well, there we go, final proof you can not read which explains why >>> your posts are rambling nonsense. >>> >>> I will type it slowly for you this time to give you a better chance to >>> understand what is written... >>> >>> What ACTIONS do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating humans? >>> >>> >>> >> >> Education. > > More puerile drivel. > > The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, > is wealth. > stop having babies works too
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 17:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fj97Ft0nrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722437 |
On 1/6/19 4:55 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-06 4:43 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 1/6/19 4:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/6/19 1:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <snip> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Less people, less problem. control the population. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Certainly a good thing to do... but would not stop the problem >>>>>>> (unless >>>>>>> you take it to an extreme). >>>>>> >>>>>> What actions do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating >>>>>> humans? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Less global harm. Less human suffering (overall and per capita). >>>> >>>> Well, there we go, final proof you can not read which explains why >>>> your posts are rambling nonsense. >>>> >>>> I will type it slowly for you this time to give you a better chance to >>>> understand what is written... >>>> >>>> What ACTIONS do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating >>>> humans? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Education. >> >> More puerile drivel. >> >> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >> is wealth. >> > stop having babies works too If we did that for 100 years then humanities problems would soon end. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 17:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsqrj0.pb8.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #722441 |
On 2019-01-06 5:02 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 1/6/19 4:55 PM, % wrote: >> On 2019-01-06 4:43 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/6/19 4:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 1:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Less people, less problem. control the population. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Certainly a good thing to do... but would not stop the problem >>>>>>>> (unless >>>>>>>> you take it to an extreme). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What actions do you propose to accomplish this goal of >>>>>>> eliminating humans? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Less global harm. Less human suffering (overall and per capita). >>>>> >>>>> Well, there we go, final proof you can not read which explains why >>>>> your posts are rambling nonsense. >>>>> >>>>> I will type it slowly for you this time to give you a better chance to >>>>> understand what is written... >>>>> >>>>> What ACTIONS do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating >>>>> humans? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Education. >>> >>> More puerile drivel. >>> >>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >>> is wealth. >>> >> stop having babies works too > > If we did that for 100 years then humanities problems would soon end. > that's right
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 00:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jviagf-qil.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #722441 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/6/19 4:55 PM, % wrote: <snip> >> stop having babies works too > > If we did that for 100 years then humanities problems would soon end. If we did that for 100 years there would be no humans. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 17:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9flamFtcvuU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722452 |
On 1/6/19 5:26 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/6/19 4:55 PM, % wrote: > > <snip> > >>> stop having babies works too >> >> If we did that for 100 years then humanities problems would soon end. > > If we did that for 100 years there would be no humans. > There would still be six left. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 01:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <65lagf-hpl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #722458 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/6/19 5:26 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 1/6/19 4:55 PM, % wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>>> stop having babies works too >>> >>> If we did that for 100 years then humanities problems would soon end. >> >> If we did that for 100 years there would be no humans. >> > > There would still be six left. Not for very long. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsqv7b.bcf.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #722468 |
On 2019-01-06 6:04 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/6/19 5:26 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/6/19 4:55 PM, % wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>>> stop having babies works too >>>> >>>> If we did that for 100 years then humanities problems would soon end. >>> >>> If we did that for 100 years there would be no humans. >>> >> >> There would still be six left. > > Not for very long. > so only do it for 50 years
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fonrFu1t8U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722468 |
On 1/6/19 6:04 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/6/19 5:26 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/6/19 4:55 PM, % wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>>> stop having babies works too >>>> >>>> If we did that for 100 years then humanities problems would soon end. >>> >>> If we did that for 100 years there would be no humans. >>> >> >> There would still be six left. > > Not for very long. > No. Always six. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web