Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #722281 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-05 17:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-01-08 10:00 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 150 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-05 17:22 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-05 22:49 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 16:12 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-05 23:25 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:49 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-05 21:15 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:29 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2019-01-06 10:50 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 08:57 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:25 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:25 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-06 10:35 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-06 10:52 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:58 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-06 12:00 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-06 10:04 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-05 23:22 -0600
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 02:09 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:26 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 05:49 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 06:34 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 17:57 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 11:16 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:25 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 11:30 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:34 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 20:27 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 13:39 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 13:57 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 14:01 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:19 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 14:36 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:40 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 14:43 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:55 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 15:53 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:55 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 16:03 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:23 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-06 18:31 -0600
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:45 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-06 18:28 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 21:36 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:00 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 23:03 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:17 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 23:43 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:54 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 00:13 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:20 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 17:32 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 00:47 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:07 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 02:32 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:50 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 04:41 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 06:07 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 18:46 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 19:49 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 20:38 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 13:52 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 14:02 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 14:08 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-07 16:17 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 14:22 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:13 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-07 17:41 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 15:45 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-07 17:58 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 16:03 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:09 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:17 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-07 18:30 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:37 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:18 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2019-01-07 15:22 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:14 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-07 16:28 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-07 19:10 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 22:05 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-07 16:25 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-07 20:44 -0600
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 19:54 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-08 09:49 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 08:15 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 22:29 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 15:37 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:18 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-07 20:32 -0600
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-08 09:50 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:55 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:02 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:21 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 00:26 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 01:04 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:23 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:35 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 02:35 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:50 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 04:43 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 06:07 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 18:47 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 19:49 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 20:40 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 13:53 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-07 19:03 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 14:01 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 22:31 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 15:51 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:06 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 16:09 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:11 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:19 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 15:49 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 15:07 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:03 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 14:36 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:41 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 14:42 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:53 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 15:52 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:57 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 16:02 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:03 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 16:06 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:24 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 17:28 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:31 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-07 00:48 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 21:34 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-09 06:48 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-09 18:04 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-09 06:38 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-09 09:48 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 20:52 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 14:08 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-06 13:11 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 14:12 -0700
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-07 04:47 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-01-06 21:32 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-06 13:03 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:49 -0500
Kensi's religion isn't that large. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-05 22:54 -0800
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-06 13:07 +0000
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:04 -0500
Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-08 10:00 -0500
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:31 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <qNadnacYQ4prAK_BnZ2dnUU7-LOdnZ2d@scnresearch.com> |
| In reply to | #722418 |
On Sun, 06 Jan 2019 15:55:46 -0700, % wrote: > On 2019-01-06 3:53 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >> In article <bsqj1s.ft3.17.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>> >>> On 2019-01-06 2:43 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <bsqi59.5tt.17.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>> >>>>> On 2019-01-06 2:36 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <bsqguf.9mj.19.12@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2019-01-06 2:01 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 1:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <g9f7c9Fqh34U2@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 1:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You are very confused and do not even know Republicans tend >>>>>>>>>>>> to deny climate science, and you confuse science and >>>>>>>>>>>> religion. Fair enough. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Puerile babble. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No scientific body of national or international standing >>>>>>>>>> maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these >>>>>>>>>> conclusions: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ? "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the >>>>>>>>>> 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over >>>>>>>>>> decades to millennia". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ? "Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and >>>>>>>>>> nitrous oxide have increased to levels unprecedented in at >>>>>>>>>> least the last 800,000 years". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ? Human influence on the climate system is clear. It is >>>>>>>>>> extremely likely (95-100% probability) that human influence was >>>>>>>>>> the dominant cause of global warming between 1951-2010. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ? "Increasing magnitudes of [global] warming increase the >>>>>>>>>> likelihood of severe, pervasive, and irreversible impacts" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ? "A first step towards adaptation to future climate change is >>>>>>>>>> reducing vulnerability and exposure to present climate >>>>>>>>>> variability" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ? "The overall risks of climate change impacts can be reduced >>>>>>>>>> by limiting the rate and magnitude of climate change" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ? Without new policies to mitigate climate change, projections >>>>>>>>>> suggest an increase in global mean temperature in 2100 of 3.7 >>>>>>>>>> to 4.8 °C, relative to pre-industrial levels (median values; >>>>>>>>>> the range is 2.5 to 7.8 °C including climate uncertainty). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ? The current trajectory of global greenhouse gas emissions is >>>>>>>>>> not consistent with limiting global warming to below 1.5 or 2 >>>>>>>>>> °C, relative to pre-industrial levels. Pledges made as part of >>>>>>>>>> the Cancún Agreements are broadly consistent with >>>>>>>>>> cost-effective scenarios that give a "likely" chance (66-100% >>>>>>>>>> probability) of limiting global warming (in 2100) to below 3 >>>>>>>>>> °C, relative to pre-industrial levels. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You confused accepting these very well supported conclusions >>>>>>>>>> with a religion. It was an absurd thing for you to claim... and >>>>>>>>>> one you cannot defend. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Now we are at the insult phase of your trolling. Go! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Less people, less problem. control the population. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Certainly a good thing to do... but would not stop the problem >>>>>>>> (unless you take it to an extreme). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> what's a jimp >>>>>> >>>>>> I knew a gal once who walked with a jimp. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> we used to go to the jimp once a week in high school >>>> >>>> Now that I got Medicare I got Silver Sneakers program and can go to >>>> the jimp for free. >>>> >>> well i'm getting jimpped i have to pay 5 bucks a month >> >> I like to watch the gals workout in their jimpsuits. >> > i like to run behind them You lech you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 17:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsqt15.chg.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #722453 |
On 2019-01-06 5:31 p.m., pandora wrote: > On Sun, 06 Jan 2019 15:55:46 -0700, % wrote: > >> On 2019-01-06 3:53 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <bsqj1s.ft3.17.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>> >>>> On 2019-01-06 2:43 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <bsqi59.5tt.17.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2019-01-06 2:36 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <bsqguf.9mj.19.12@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2019-01-06 2:01 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 1:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <g9f7c9Fqh34U2@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 1:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You are very confused and do not even know Republicans tend >>>>>>>>>>>>> to deny climate science, and you confuse science and >>>>>>>>>>>>> religion. Fair enough. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Puerile babble. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No scientific body of national or international standing >>>>>>>>>>> maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these >>>>>>>>>>> conclusions: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the >>>>>>>>>>> 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over >>>>>>>>>>> decades to millennia". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? "Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and >>>>>>>>>>> nitrous oxide have increased to levels unprecedented in at >>>>>>>>>>> least the last 800,000 years". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? Human influence on the climate system is clear. It is >>>>>>>>>>> extremely likely (95-100% probability) that human influence was >>>>>>>>>>> the dominant cause of global warming between 1951-2010. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? "Increasing magnitudes of [global] warming increase the >>>>>>>>>>> likelihood of severe, pervasive, and irreversible impacts" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? "A first step towards adaptation to future climate change is >>>>>>>>>>> reducing vulnerability and exposure to present climate >>>>>>>>>>> variability" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? "The overall risks of climate change impacts can be reduced >>>>>>>>>>> by limiting the rate and magnitude of climate change" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? Without new policies to mitigate climate change, projections >>>>>>>>>>> suggest an increase in global mean temperature in 2100 of 3.7 >>>>>>>>>>> to 4.8 °C, relative to pre-industrial levels (median values; >>>>>>>>>>> the range is 2.5 to 7.8 °C including climate uncertainty). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ? The current trajectory of global greenhouse gas emissions is >>>>>>>>>>> not consistent with limiting global warming to below 1.5 or 2 >>>>>>>>>>> °C, relative to pre-industrial levels. Pledges made as part of >>>>>>>>>>> the Cancún Agreements are broadly consistent with >>>>>>>>>>> cost-effective scenarios that give a "likely" chance (66-100% >>>>>>>>>>> probability) of limiting global warming (in 2100) to below 3 >>>>>>>>>>> °C, relative to pre-industrial levels. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You confused accepting these very well supported conclusions >>>>>>>>>>> with a religion. It was an absurd thing for you to claim... and >>>>>>>>>>> one you cannot defend. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Now we are at the insult phase of your trolling. Go! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Less people, less problem. control the population. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Certainly a good thing to do... but would not stop the problem >>>>>>>>> (unless you take it to an extreme). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> what's a jimp >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I knew a gal once who walked with a jimp. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> we used to go to the jimp once a week in high school >>>>> >>>>> Now that I got Medicare I got Silver Sneakers program and can go to >>>>> the jimp for free. >>>>> >>>> well i'm getting jimpped i have to pay 5 bucks a month >>> >>> I like to watch the gals workout in their jimpsuits. >>> >> i like to run behind them > > You lech you. > hi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.369c594175f6376e995ee9@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #722453 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <qNadnacYQ4prAK_BnZ2dnUU7- LOdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says... # # On Sun, 06 Jan 2019 15:55:46 -0700, % wrote: # # > On 2019-01-06 3:53 p.m., Skeeter wrote: # >> In article <bsqj1s.ft3.17.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... # >>> # >>> On 2019-01-06 2:43 p.m., Skeeter wrote: # >>>> In article <bsqi59.5tt.17.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... # >>>>> # >>>>> On 2019-01-06 2:36 p.m., Skeeter wrote: # >>>>>> In article <bsqguf.9mj.19.12@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com # >>>>>> says... # >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> On 2019-01-06 2:01 p.m., Snit wrote: # >>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 1:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: # >>>>>>>>> In article <g9f7c9Fqh34U2@mid.individual.net>, # >>>>>>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 1:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: # >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: # >>>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>>> <snip> # >>>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>>>> You are very confused and do not even know Republicans tend # >>>>>>>>>>>> to deny climate science, and you confuse science and # >>>>>>>>>>>> religion. Fair enough. # >>>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>>> Puerile babble. # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> No scientific body of national or international standing # >>>>>>>>>> maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these # >>>>>>>>>> conclusions: # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> ? "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the # >>>>>>>>>> 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over # >>>>>>>>>> decades to millennia". # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> ? "Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and # >>>>>>>>>> nitrous oxide have increased to levels unprecedented in at # >>>>>>>>>> least the last 800,000 years". # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> ? Human influence on the climate system is clear. It is # >>>>>>>>>> extremely likely (95-100% probability) that human influence was # >>>>>>>>>> the dominant cause of global warming between 1951-2010. # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> ? "Increasing magnitudes of [global] warming increase the # >>>>>>>>>> likelihood of severe, pervasive, and irreversible impacts" # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> ? "A first step towards adaptation to future climate change is # >>>>>>>>>> reducing vulnerability and exposure to present climate # >>>>>>>>>> variability" # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> ? "The overall risks of climate change impacts can be reduced # >>>>>>>>>> by limiting the rate and magnitude of climate change" # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> ? Without new policies to mitigate climate change, projections # >>>>>>>>>> suggest an increase in global mean temperature in 2100 of 3.7 # >>>>>>>>>> to 4.8 °C, relative to pre-industrial levels (median values; # >>>>>>>>>> the range is 2.5 to 7.8 °C including climate uncertainty). # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> ? The current trajectory of global greenhouse gas emissions is # >>>>>>>>>> not consistent with limiting global warming to below 1.5 or 2 # >>>>>>>>>> °C, relative to pre-industrial levels. Pledges made as part of # >>>>>>>>>> the Cancún Agreements are broadly consistent with # >>>>>>>>>> cost-effective scenarios that give a "likely" chance (66-100% # >>>>>>>>>> probability) of limiting global warming (in 2100) to below 3 # >>>>>>>>>> °C, relative to pre-industrial levels. # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> You confused accepting these very well supported conclusions # >>>>>>>>>> with a religion. It was an absurd thing for you to claim... and # >>>>>>>>>> one you cannot defend. # >>>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>>> Now we are at the insult phase of your trolling. Go! # >>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>> Less people, less problem. control the population. # >>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> Certainly a good thing to do... but would not stop the problem # >>>>>>>> (unless you take it to an extreme). # >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>> what's a jimp # >>>>>> # >>>>>> I knew a gal once who walked with a jimp. # >>>>>> # >>>>>> # >>>>> we used to go to the jimp once a week in high school # >>>> # >>>> Now that I got Medicare I got Silver Sneakers program and can go to # >>>> the jimp for free. # >>>> # >>> well i'm getting jimpped i have to pay 5 bucks a month # >> # >> I like to watch the gals workout in their jimpsuits. # >> # > i like to run behind them # # You lech you. Sometimes he flops on the ground and pretends he's having a seizure. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 21:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <209agf-qjk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #722375 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/6/19 1:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: <snip> >> Less people, less problem. control the population. >> > > Certainly a good thing to do... but would not stop the problem (unless > you take it to an extreme). What actions do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating humans? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 22:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g9fc4aFrigmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722399 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/6/19 1:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: > > <snip> > >>> Less people, less problem. control the population. >>> >> >> Certainly a good thing to do... but would not stop the problem (unless >> you take it to an extreme). > > What actions do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating humans? > Less global harm. Less human suffering (overall and per capita).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 23:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <j3eagf-93l.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #722406 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 1/6/19 1:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>>> Less people, less problem. control the population. >>>> >>> >>> Certainly a good thing to do... but would not stop the problem (unless >>> you take it to an extreme). >> >> What actions do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating humans? >> > > Less global harm. Less human suffering (overall and per capita). Well, there we go, final proof you can not read which explains why your posts are rambling nonsense. I will type it slowly for you this time to give you a better chance to understand what is written... What ACTIONS do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating humans? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 16:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fgk5Fsea2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722426 |
On 1/6/19 4:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/6/19 1:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>>> Less people, less problem. control the population. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Certainly a good thing to do... but would not stop the problem (unless >>>> you take it to an extreme). >>> >>> What actions do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating humans? >>> >> >> Less global harm. Less human suffering (overall and per capita). > > Well, there we go, final proof you can not read which explains why > your posts are rambling nonsense. > > I will type it slowly for you this time to give you a better chance to > understand what is written... > > What ACTIONS do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating humans? > > > Education. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 23:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6egagf-hal.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #722427 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/6/19 4:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 1/6/19 1:57 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>>>> Less people, less problem. control the population. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Certainly a good thing to do... but would not stop the problem (unless >>>>> you take it to an extreme). >>>> >>>> What actions do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating humans? >>>> >>> >>> Less global harm. Less human suffering (overall and per capita). >> >> Well, there we go, final proof you can not read which explains why >> your posts are rambling nonsense. >> >> I will type it slowly for you this time to give you a better chance to >> understand what is written... >> >> What ACTIONS do you propose to accomplish this goal of eliminating humans? >> >> >> > > Education. More puerile drivel. The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, is wealth. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 16:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fiqgFsujvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722434 |
On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: ... >> Education. > > More puerile drivel. > > The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, > is wealth. The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling. Oh, and a more educated population tends to be more liberal and more wealthy. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 00:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <47iagf-5gl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #722436 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > ... >>> Education. >> >> More puerile drivel. >> >> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >> is wealth. > > The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling. Once again you show that you are unable to read. I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 17:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fkb2Ft770U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722444 |
On 1/6/19 5:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> ... >>>> Education. >>> >>> More puerile drivel. >>> >>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >>> is wealth. >> >> The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling. > > Once again you show that you are unable to read. > > I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that > education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. > > You labeled education as "puerile drivel" and then said your suggestion would be one of the results of education. In other words, you are just trolling. You also ignored the fact that education leads not only to greater wealth but also to people being more liberal. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 17:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.369c4c0975503daf8a1@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #722446 |
In article <g9fkb2Ft770U1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that >> education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. >> >> > >You labeled education as "puerile drivel" and then said your suggestion >would be one of the results of education. > >In other words, you are just trolling. > >You also ignored the fact that education leads not only to greater >wealth but also to people being more liberal. > He's right, I saw it. You accuse everyone who doesn't agree with you of being a troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 00:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o5kagf-kml.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #722446 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/6/19 5:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> ... >>>>> Education. >>>> >>>> More puerile drivel. >>>> >>>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >>>> is wealth. >>> >>> The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling. >> >> Once again you show that you are unable to read. >> >> I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that >> education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. >> >> > > You labeled education as "puerile drivel" Lier. I said that education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. <snip remaining> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fn28Fto60U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722446 |
On 1/6/19 5:20 PM, Snit wrote: > On 1/6/19 5:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> ... >>>>> Education. >>>> >>>> More puerile drivel. >>>> >>>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >>>> is wealth. >>> >>> The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling. >> >> Once again you show that you are unable to read. >> >> I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that >> education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. >> >> > > You labeled education as "puerile drivel" and then said your suggestion > would be one of the results of education. > > In other words, you are just trolling. > > You also ignored the fact that education leads not only to greater > wealth but also to people being more liberal. > In response Jimp pulled a Klaus. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 02:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <paqagf-89m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #722467 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/6/19 5:20 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 1/6/19 5:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>> Education. >>>>> >>>>> More puerile drivel. >>>>> >>>>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >>>>> is wealth. >>>> >>>> The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling. >>> >>> Once again you show that you are unable to read. >>> >>> I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that >>> education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. >>> >>> >> >> You labeled education as "puerile drivel" and then said your suggestion >> would be one of the results of education. >> >> In other words, you are just trolling. >> >> You also ignored the fact that education leads not only to greater >> wealth but also to people being more liberal. >> > > In response Jimp pulled a Klaus. In response, jimp showed you are a liar. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 02:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g9ft3kFft2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722483 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/6/19 5:20 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/6/19 5:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>>>> Education. >>>>>> >>>>>> More puerile drivel. >>>>>> >>>>>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >>>>>> is wealth. >>>>> >>>>> The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling. >>>> >>>> Once again you show that you are unable to read. >>>> >>>> I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that >>>> education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> You labeled education as "puerile drivel" and then said your suggestion >>> would be one of the results of education. >>> >>> In other words, you are just trolling. >>> >>> You also ignored the fact that education leads not only to greater >>> wealth but also to people being more liberal. >>> >> >> In response Jimp pulled a Klaus. > > In response, jimp showed you are a liar. > Quote the lie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 04:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vs1bgf-2vm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #722485 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 1/6/19 5:20 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/6/19 5:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> Education. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More puerile drivel. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >>>>>>> is wealth. >>>>>> >>>>>> The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling. >>>>> >>>>> Once again you show that you are unable to read. >>>>> >>>>> I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that >>>>> education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> You labeled education as "puerile drivel" and then said your suggestion >>>> would be one of the results of education. >>>> >>>> In other words, you are just trolling. >>>> >>>> You also ignored the fact that education leads not only to greater >>>> wealth but also to people being more liberal. >>>> >>> >>> In response Jimp pulled a Klaus. >> >> In response, jimp showed you are a liar. >> > > Quote the lie. Here you go: "You labeled education as "puerile drivel" -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 06:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g9g8lkF2oltU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722501 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/6/19 5:20 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/6/19 5:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> Education. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More puerile drivel. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >>>>>>>> is wealth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling. >>>>>> >>>>>> Once again you show that you are unable to read. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that >>>>>> education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You labeled education as "puerile drivel" and then said your suggestion >>>>> would be one of the results of education. >>>>> >>>>> In other words, you are just trolling. >>>>> >>>>> You also ignored the fact that education leads not only to greater >>>>> wealth but also to people being more liberal. >>>>> >>>> >>>> In response Jimp pulled a Klaus. >>> >>> In response, jimp showed you are a liar. >>> >> >> Quote the lie. > > Here you go: "You labeled education as "puerile drivel" > Which, in the context of that quote, you did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 18:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vcjcgf-irr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #722504 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 1/6/19 5:20 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 1/6/19 5:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>> Education. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> More puerile drivel. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >>>>>>>>> is wealth. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once again you show that you are unable to read. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that >>>>>>> education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You labeled education as "puerile drivel" and then said your suggestion >>>>>> would be one of the results of education. >>>>>> >>>>>> In other words, you are just trolling. >>>>>> >>>>>> You also ignored the fact that education leads not only to greater >>>>>> wealth but also to people being more liberal. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In response Jimp pulled a Klaus. >>>> >>>> In response, jimp showed you are a liar. >>>> >>> >>> Quote the lie. >> >> Here you go: "You labeled education as "puerile drivel" >> > > Which, in the context of that quote, you did. Illogical nonsense. I said that education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. Apparently you are unable to understand English sentence structure, i.e. subject, verb, predicate, etc. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 19:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g9hor4Fd7vvU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #722528 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/6/19 5:20 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/6/19 5:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>> Education. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> More puerile drivel. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The only thing that reduces populations, other than outright killing, >>>>>>>>>> is wealth. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The fact you think education is "puerile drivel" is quite telling. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Once again you show that you are unable to read. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I did not say that I think education is puerile drivel, I said that >>>>>>>> education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You labeled education as "puerile drivel" and then said your suggestion >>>>>>> would be one of the results of education. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In other words, you are just trolling. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You also ignored the fact that education leads not only to greater >>>>>>> wealth but also to people being more liberal. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> In response Jimp pulled a Klaus. >>>>> >>>>> In response, jimp showed you are a liar. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Quote the lie. >>> >>> Here you go: "You labeled education as "puerile drivel" >>> >> >> Which, in the context of that quote, you did. > > Illogical nonsense. I never said your comment made sense. > > I said that education as a method to reduce population is puerile drivel. That was the context. Yes. And then you listed things education helps bring as important in that context. And now you are going in circles. > > Apparently you are unable to understand English sentence structure, i.e. > subject, verb, predicate, etc. > Talking out loud to yourself might be a benefit. Good to see.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web