Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #721880 > unrolled thread

Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2019-01-01 05:15 -0500
Last post2019-01-18 21:09 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 249 — 25 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-01 05:15 -0500
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 03:52 -0700
      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-03 22:30 -0800
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 09:31 -0500
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 10:24 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 13:56 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 12:01 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-04 18:12 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-05 11:28 -0600
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-05 13:07 -0500
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-09 07:01 +0000
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 09:33 -0500
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-09 10:33 -0600
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:18 +0000
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-09 23:24 -0600
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 10:59 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:22 -0800
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:02 +0000
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 00:25 -0800
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:54 +0000
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 05:01 -0800
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:05 +0000
                          NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:27 +0000
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 16:43 -0700
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 19:17 -0500
                              Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:36 -0800
                              Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:54 +0000
                                Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 11:03 -0600
                                  Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 11:05 -0600
                                    Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change eSrgio <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 12:04 -0600
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:56 -0800
                              Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 19:59 -0700
                                Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 22:36 -0800
                                  Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 08:38 -0700
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:52 +0000
                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:50 -0800
                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-13 21:09 +0000
                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 14:35 -0800
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-14 00:01 +0000
                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 19:54 -0800
                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-15 02:28 +0000
                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 20:58 -0800
                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-15 00:03 -0700
                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 23:52 -0800
                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:36 -0700
                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 04:04 +0000
                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-16 09:38 +0000
                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:49 -0800
                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:41 -0800
                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:45 +0000
                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 14:53 -0600
                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:57 +0000
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 15:05 -0600
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:50 -0800
                                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:23 +0000
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-16 20:31 -0500
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-16 18:40 -0700
                                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-16 19:02 -0700
                                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:09 +0000
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:48 -0800
                                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:20 +0000
                                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:30 -0700
                                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:59 -0800
                                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:04 -0700
                                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:47 -0800
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 10:15 -0700
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:54 -0700
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:20 -0800
                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:48 -0800
                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:24 +0000
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 18:30 -0700
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:55 -0700
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:10 -0800
                                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:12 +0000
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:34 -0800
                                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:23 +0000
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:31 -0700
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:49 -0800
                                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 04:06 +0000
                                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 20:19 -0800
                                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 06:24 +0000
                                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 23:28 -0800
                                                                    Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 22:09 +0000
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 15:22 -0700
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:27 -0500
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:20 -0700
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:32 -0500
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:40 -0700
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:46 -0500
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:55 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 22:26 -0500
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:38 -0800
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 15:11 -0800
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 00:29 +0000
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:33 -0700
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0800
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 18:57 -0800
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 03:48 +0000
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:58 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 21:48 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 23:48 -0800
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 10:47 -0700
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:10 -0800
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:43 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:47 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:42 -0800
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:17 -0700
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 02:41 +0000
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:55 -0700
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:34 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:36 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:46 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:48 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:53 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:57 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:10 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:44 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:48 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:25 +0000
                                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:44 -0800
                                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:33 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:32 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:53 -0500
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:59 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0800
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:49 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 17:12 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 20:58 -0800
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 21:00 -0800
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-20 09:17 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:45 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:47 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:50 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
                                                                                          Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-20 10:08 -0800
                                                                                            Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:39 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 12:10 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-20 15:31 -0800
                                                                                                Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 16:34 -0700
                                                                                        Nadegda can't handle the truth. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-20 10:31 -0800
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda can't handle the truth. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:32 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:40 +0000
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:40 +0000
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:34 -0800
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:29 +0000
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:12 -0800
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:38 -0500
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:41 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:48 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:52 -0500
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:57 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 18:03 -0500
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 21:56 -0800
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:56 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:35 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 01:22 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 18:49 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 02:01 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-19 21:03 -0500
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 19:09 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:16 +0000
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:51 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:55 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 23:04 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:16 -0800
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:48 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 00:00 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:36 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:57 -0800
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-21 17:19 -0800
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:53 -0800
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:20 +0000
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:19 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:20 -0800
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:47 -0700
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:12 +0000
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:33 -0800
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 11:07 -0500
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 07:27 -0700
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 09:42 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:59 -0800
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-09 09:49 -0700
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-09 13:28 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 14:38 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 17:13 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:12 -0800
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 15:22 -0500
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-10 15:28 -0600
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-11 09:48 -0600
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:03 +0000
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 19:26 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:20 +0000
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:57 -0800
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-01-20 07:29 +0000
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 05:55 -0500
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-01 16:07 +0000
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-01 10:36 -0700
      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 09:38 -0800
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 11:49 -0600
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:23 -0500
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:27 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:33 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:38 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:37 -0700
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:41 -0700
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:43 -0500
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:05 -0700
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:18 -0700
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:32 -0700
                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:42 -0700
                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:50 -0700
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:54 -0700
                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:05 -0700
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 15:27 -0700
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:00 -0700
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:04 -0700
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:17 -0700
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:25 -0700
                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:44 -0700
                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:57 -0700
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:06 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-01 12:48 -0800
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 09:33 -0800
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-17 20:23 -0800
      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 00:13 -0700
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:34 -0800
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 21:09 -0800

Page 12 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13  Next page →


#721923

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2019-01-01 14:43 -0500
Message-ID<llgn2el0u0sdbm7el9v4f5gibiqhtl7r67@4ax.com>
In reply to#721922
On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:


>LOL and he was properly informed

Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
uninformed as they come.

-- 

Everybody here likes Yours Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721924

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Message-ID<g91ustFstr7U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#721923
On 1/1/19 12:43 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> LOL and he was properly informed
> 
> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
> uninformed as they come.
> 

Oh! Oh! Oh! By all means rub this in my face and show my recent comments 
where I show deep ignorance on topics.

Seriously, do it. If you are right then I can learn. I *do* make 
mistakes. We all do. Heck, when I said the NRA writes the gun laws I was 
rightfully called out on it -- they heavily influence the laws (as I was 
able to show) but I cannot show where they WRITE them. Fair enough. I 
learned and I appreciate being corrected.

So correct me. Point out where you think I am wrong.

And if you cannot, well, then you will have learned something -- if you 
are open to it.

My guess: you will not. You do not even believe it. Your real issue is 
your own insecurity with your views. You are bothered more by how well I 
back my views, not by how wrong I am.

Your response will show insight as to if my guess is correct.

Ball is in your court.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721925

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Message-ID<bsd64j.dso.19.3@news.alt.net>
In reply to#721923
On 2019-01-01 12:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> LOL and he was properly informed
> 
> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
> uninformed as they come.
> 
that makes him honest

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721930

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:05 -0700
Message-ID<g91vfeFt1jrU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#721925
On 1/1/19 12:55 PM, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-01 12:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>
>> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
>> uninformed as they come.
>>
> that makes him honest

I cannot find what it means to be uninformed.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721932

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:18 -0700
Message-ID<bsd7ga.vae.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#721930
On 2019-01-01 1:05 p.m., Snit wrote:
> On 1/1/19 12:55 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2019-01-01 12:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>
>>> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
>>> uninformed as they come.
>>>
>> that makes him honest
> 
> I cannot find what it means to be uninformed.
> 
that makes you tell lies but they aren't lies you were just misinformed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721934

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
Message-ID<g920pcFtanvU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#721932
On 1/1/19 1:18 PM, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-01 1:05 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 1/1/19 12:55 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2019-01-01 12:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>>
>>>> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
>>>> uninformed as they come.
>>>>
>>> that makes him honest
>>
>> I cannot find what it means to be uninformed.
>>
> that makes you tell lies but they aren't lies you were just misinformed

I used to date a woman who was un-informed. Glad she never became 
miss-informed.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721937

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:32 -0700
Message-ID<bsd8a2.523.19.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to#721934
On 2019-01-01 1:27 p.m., Snit wrote:
> On 1/1/19 1:18 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2019-01-01 1:05 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> On 1/1/19 12:55 PM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>>>
>>>>> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
>>>>> uninformed as they come.
>>>>>
>>>> that makes him honest
>>>
>>> I cannot find what it means to be uninformed.
>>>
>> that makes you tell lies but they aren't lies you were just misinformed
> 
> I used to date a woman who was un-informed. Glad she never became 
> miss-informed.
> 
> 
she had a brother named not

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721939

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:42 -0700
Message-ID<g921mcFtianU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#721937
On 1/1/19 1:32 PM, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-01 1:27 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 1/1/19 1:18 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2019-01-01 1:05 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On 1/1/19 12:55 PM, % wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
>>>>>> uninformed as they come.
>>>>>>
>>>>> that makes him honest
>>>>
>>>> I cannot find what it means to be uninformed.
>>>>
>>> that makes you tell lies but they aren't lies you were just misinformed
>>
>> I used to date a woman who was un-informed. Glad she never became 
>> miss-informed.
>>
>>
> she had a brother named not

Wow! Is your name "Well"?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721943

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:50 -0700
Message-ID<bsd9cd.dut.19.6@news.alt.net>
In reply to#721939
On 2019-01-01 1:42 p.m., Snit wrote:
> On 1/1/19 1:32 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2019-01-01 1:27 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> On 1/1/19 1:18 PM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2019-01-01 1:05 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 1/1/19 12:55 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
>>>>>>> uninformed as they come.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> that makes him honest
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot find what it means to be uninformed.
>>>>>
>>>> that makes you tell lies but they aren't lies you were just misinformed
>>>
>>> I used to date a woman who was un-informed. Glad she never became 
>>> miss-informed.
>>>
>>>
>> she had a brother named not
> 
> Wow! Is your name "Well"?
> 
no , i am i am tell them i am

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721944

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:54 -0700
Message-ID<g922bgFtmj3U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#721943
On 1/1/19 1:50 PM, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-01 1:42 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 1/1/19 1:32 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2019-01-01 1:27 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On 1/1/19 1:18 PM, % wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-01-01 1:05 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/1/19 12:55 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
>>>>>>>> uninformed as they come.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that makes him honest
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I cannot find what it means to be uninformed.
>>>>>>
>>>>> that makes you tell lies but they aren't lies you were just 
>>>>> misinformed
>>>>
>>>> I used to date a woman who was un-informed. Glad she never became 
>>>> miss-informed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> she had a brother named not
>>
>> Wow! Is your name "Well"?
>>
> no , i am i am tell them i am

Are you?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721947

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
Message-ID<bsd9rt.eba.17.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to#721944
On 2019-01-01 1:54 p.m., Snit wrote:
> On 1/1/19 1:50 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2019-01-01 1:42 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> On 1/1/19 1:32 PM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2019-01-01 1:27 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 1/1/19 1:18 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 1:05 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/1/19 12:55 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
>>>>>>>>> uninformed as they come.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that makes him honest
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I cannot find what it means to be uninformed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> that makes you tell lies but they aren't lies you were just 
>>>>>> misinformed
>>>>>
>>>>> I used to date a woman who was un-informed. Glad she never became 
>>>>> miss-informed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> she had a brother named not
>>>
>>> Wow! Is your name "Well"?
>>>
>> no , i am i am tell them i am
> 
> Are you?
> 
should i be

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721948

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2019-01-01 14:05 -0700
Message-ID<g9230tFtqmgU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#721947
On 1/1/19 1:58 PM, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-01 1:54 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 1/1/19 1:50 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2019-01-01 1:42 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On 1/1/19 1:32 PM, % wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-01-01 1:27 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/1/19 1:18 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 1:05 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/1/19 12:55 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
>>>>>>>>>> uninformed as they come.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that makes him honest
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I cannot find what it means to be uninformed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that makes you tell lies but they aren't lies you were just 
>>>>>>> misinformed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I used to date a woman who was un-informed. Glad she never became 
>>>>>> miss-informed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> she had a brother named not
>>>>
>>>> Wow! Is your name "Well"?
>>>>
>>> no , i am i am tell them i am
>>
>> Are you?
>>
> should i be

I am uninformed.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721957

FromJust Wondering <JW@me.com>
Date2019-01-01 15:27 -0700
Message-ID<aPRWD.163980$4D2.23261@fx22.iad>
In reply to#721943
On 1/1/2019 1:50 PM, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-01 1:42 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 1/1/19 1:32 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2019-01-01 1:27 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On 1/1/19 1:18 PM, % wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-01-01 1:05 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/1/19 12:55 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as
>>>>>>>> uninformed as they come.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that makes him honest
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I cannot find what it means to be uninformed.
>>>>>>
>>>>> that makes you tell lies but they aren't lies you were just 
>>>>> misinformed
>>>>
>>>> I used to date a woman who was un-informed. Glad she never became 
>>>> miss-informed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> she had a brother named not
>>
>> Wow! Is your name "Well"?
>>
> no , i am i am tell them i am

"I am, I said,"  -- Neil Diamond

"I am Groot." -- coined by Stan Lee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721926

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Message-ID<g91uucFstr7U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#721922
On 1/1/19 12:41 PM, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-01 12:37 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 1/1/19 12:27 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2019-01-01 12:23 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 09:38:52 -0800, "Michael Ejercito" 
>>>> <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>    Any building over five centuries old has outlasted climate change.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're a dope, Michael.  Climate change has been
>>>> happening since the Earth cooled down enough to have
>>>> climate. That would be hundreds of millions, if not
>>>> billions of years, you fool.
>>>>
>>>> No building can outlast climate change because climate
>>>> change IS climate. Doh!
>>>>
>>>> Now, get over in the corner and don't take off that
>>>> dunce cap.
>>>>
>>> did you plan on starting the year off being a dick
>>
>> He started it by posting ignorant things. Interesting.
>>
> LOL and he was properly informed

Yup. And if he wants more information he can go to ANY scientific site 
that discusses the topic. ANY.

It is not like this is some state secret Trump is letting out in tweets. :)

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721927

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:00 -0700
Message-ID<bsd6di.afs.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#721926
On 2019-01-01 12:55 p.m., Snit wrote:
> On 1/1/19 12:41 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2019-01-01 12:37 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> On 1/1/19 12:27 PM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:23 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 09:38:52 -0800, "Michael Ejercito" 
>>>>> <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>    Any building over five centuries old has outlasted climate change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're a dope, Michael.  Climate change has been
>>>>> happening since the Earth cooled down enough to have
>>>>> climate. That would be hundreds of millions, if not
>>>>> billions of years, you fool.
>>>>>
>>>>> No building can outlast climate change because climate
>>>>> change IS climate. Doh!
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, get over in the corner and don't take off that
>>>>> dunce cap.
>>>>>
>>>> did you plan on starting the year off being a dick
>>>
>>> He started it by posting ignorant things. Interesting.
>>>
>> LOL and he was properly informed
> 
> Yup. And if he wants more information he can go to ANY scientific site 
> that discusses the topic. ANY.
> 
> It is not like this is some state secret Trump is letting out in tweets. :)
> 
he can bring his golf clubs

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721929

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:04 -0700
Message-ID<g91vedFt1jrU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#721927
On 1/1/19 1:00 PM, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-01 12:55 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 1/1/19 12:41 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2019-01-01 12:37 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On 1/1/19 12:27 PM, % wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:23 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 09:38:52 -0800, "Michael Ejercito" 
>>>>>> <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Any building over five centuries old has outlasted climate 
>>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're a dope, Michael.  Climate change has been
>>>>>> happening since the Earth cooled down enough to have
>>>>>> climate. That would be hundreds of millions, if not
>>>>>> billions of years, you fool.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No building can outlast climate change because climate
>>>>>> change IS climate. Doh!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, get over in the corner and don't take off that
>>>>>> dunce cap.
>>>>>>
>>>>> did you plan on starting the year off being a dick
>>>>
>>>> He started it by posting ignorant things. Interesting.
>>>>
>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>
>> Yup. And if he wants more information he can go to ANY scientific site 
>> that discusses the topic. ANY.
>>
>> It is not like this is some state secret Trump is letting out in 
>> tweets. :)
>>
> he can bring his golf clubs

And let the people of the US pay for it.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721931

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:17 -0700
Message-ID<bsd7eu.vae.19.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#721929
On 2019-01-01 1:04 p.m., Snit wrote:
> On 1/1/19 1:00 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2019-01-01 12:55 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> On 1/1/19 12:41 PM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:37 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 1/1/19 12:27 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:23 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 09:38:52 -0800, "Michael Ejercito" 
>>>>>>> <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    Any building over five centuries old has outlasted climate 
>>>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're a dope, Michael.  Climate change has been
>>>>>>> happening since the Earth cooled down enough to have
>>>>>>> climate. That would be hundreds of millions, if not
>>>>>>> billions of years, you fool.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No building can outlast climate change because climate
>>>>>>> change IS climate. Doh!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, get over in the corner and don't take off that
>>>>>>> dunce cap.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> did you plan on starting the year off being a dick
>>>>>
>>>>> He started it by posting ignorant things. Interesting.
>>>>>
>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>
>>> Yup. And if he wants more information he can go to ANY scientific 
>>> site that discusses the topic. ANY.
>>>
>>> It is not like this is some state secret Trump is letting out in 
>>> tweets. :)
>>>
>> he can bring his golf clubs
> 
> And let the people of the US pay for it.
> 
somebody has to pay and i'm not doing it

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721933

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:25 -0700
Message-ID<g920mhFtanvU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#721931
On 1/1/19 1:17 PM, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-01 1:04 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 1/1/19 1:00 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2019-01-01 12:55 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On 1/1/19 12:41 PM, % wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:37 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/1/19 12:27 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:23 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 09:38:52 -0800, "Michael Ejercito" 
>>>>>>>> <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    Any building over five centuries old has outlasted climate 
>>>>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're a dope, Michael.  Climate change has been
>>>>>>>> happening since the Earth cooled down enough to have
>>>>>>>> climate. That would be hundreds of millions, if not
>>>>>>>> billions of years, you fool.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No building can outlast climate change because climate
>>>>>>>> change IS climate. Doh!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now, get over in the corner and don't take off that
>>>>>>>> dunce cap.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> did you plan on starting the year off being a dick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He started it by posting ignorant things. Interesting.
>>>>>>
>>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>>
>>>> Yup. And if he wants more information he can go to ANY scientific 
>>>> site that discusses the topic. ANY.
>>>>
>>>> It is not like this is some state secret Trump is letting out in 
>>>> tweets. :)
>>>>
>>> he can bring his golf clubs
>>
>> And let the people of the US pay for it.
>>
> somebody has to pay and i'm not doing it

Conservatives want everything for free. They think Mexico will pay for it.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721935

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
Message-ID<bsd80l.523.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#721933
On 2019-01-01 1:25 p.m., Snit wrote:
> On 1/1/19 1:17 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2019-01-01 1:04 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> On 1/1/19 1:00 PM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:55 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 1/1/19 12:41 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:37 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/1/19 12:27 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:23 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 09:38:52 -0800, "Michael Ejercito" 
>>>>>>>>> <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    Any building over five centuries old has outlasted climate 
>>>>>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're a dope, Michael.  Climate change has been
>>>>>>>>> happening since the Earth cooled down enough to have
>>>>>>>>> climate. That would be hundreds of millions, if not
>>>>>>>>> billions of years, you fool.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No building can outlast climate change because climate
>>>>>>>>> change IS climate. Doh!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now, get over in the corner and don't take off that
>>>>>>>>> dunce cap.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> did you plan on starting the year off being a dick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He started it by posting ignorant things. Interesting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>>>
>>>>> Yup. And if he wants more information he can go to ANY scientific 
>>>>> site that discusses the topic. ANY.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not like this is some state secret Trump is letting out in 
>>>>> tweets. :)
>>>>>
>>>> he can bring his golf clubs
>>>
>>> And let the people of the US pay for it.
>>>
>> somebody has to pay and i'm not doing it
> 
> Conservatives want everything for free. They think Mexico will pay for it.
> 
maybe they will i don't know much about it

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#721941

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2019-01-01 13:44 -0700
Message-ID<g921ptFtianU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#721935
On 1/1/19 1:27 PM, % wrote:
> On 2019-01-01 1:25 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 1/1/19 1:17 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2019-01-01 1:04 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On 1/1/19 1:00 PM, % wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:55 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/1/19 12:41 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:37 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/1/19 12:27 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-01 12:23 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 09:38:52 -0800, "Michael Ejercito" 
>>>>>>>>>> <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>    Any building over five centuries old has outlasted climate 
>>>>>>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You're a dope, Michael.  Climate change has been
>>>>>>>>>> happening since the Earth cooled down enough to have
>>>>>>>>>> climate. That would be hundreds of millions, if not
>>>>>>>>>> billions of years, you fool.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No building can outlast climate change because climate
>>>>>>>>>> change IS climate. Doh!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now, get over in the corner and don't take off that
>>>>>>>>>> dunce cap.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> did you plan on starting the year off being a dick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He started it by posting ignorant things. Interesting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL and he was properly informed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yup. And if he wants more information he can go to ANY scientific 
>>>>>> site that discusses the topic. ANY.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is not like this is some state secret Trump is letting out in 
>>>>>> tweets. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>> he can bring his golf clubs
>>>>
>>>> And let the people of the US pay for it.
>>>>
>>> somebody has to pay and i'm not doing it
>>
>> Conservatives want everything for free. They think Mexico will pay for 
>> it.
>>
> maybe they will i don't know much about it

You have that in common with Trump.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 12 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web