Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #721225 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-28 11:58 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-28 11:29 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 147 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Solastalgia Is The Specific Grief And Anxiety Caused By Climate Change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 11:58 -0500
Re: Solastalgia Is The Specific Grief And Anxiety Caused By Climate Change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:06 -0700
Re: Solastalgia Is The Specific Grief And Anxiety Caused By Climate Change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:11 -0700
Re: Solastalgia Is The Specific Grief And Anxiety Caused By Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-28 12:15 -0500
Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-28 14:34 -0800
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 15:47 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 17:53 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 15:57 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 18:09 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:10 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:18 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:23 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:38 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:12 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 18:25 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 18:08 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:14 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 18:18 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:20 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:27 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:34 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 18:40 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:54 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:58 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:59 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:00 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:13 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:20 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:29 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:33 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:40 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:42 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:45 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 19:08 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:12 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 19:13 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:23 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 20:00 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:05 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 20:12 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:13 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 21:23 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:27 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 19:06 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:13 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 19:16 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:19 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 19:34 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:39 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 20:04 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:12 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 20:17 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:13 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 21:19 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:35 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:54 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:05 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 12:36 -0500
Snit's apocalypse cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-28 15:58 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:00 -0700
The REAL climate denier. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-28 16:16 -0800
Re: The REAL climate denier. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:18 -0700
Re: The REAL climate denier. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:22 -0800
Science FICTION ( fake news ). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-28 16:34 -0800
Re: Science FICTION ( fake news ). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:39 -0700
Snit needs his apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-28 16:53 -0800
Re: Snit needs his apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:55 -0700
Re: Snit needs his apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 17:06 -0800
Re: Science FICTION ( fake news ). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:42 -0700
Re: The REAL climate denier. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:28 -0700
Re: The REAL climate denier. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:51 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-28 20:49 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:02 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-28 22:18 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:37 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-28 23:19 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 21:25 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-29 21:12 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:33 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-29 21:37 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:52 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-30 10:26 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:08 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-30 13:39 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:52 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 13:56 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-30 16:02 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:50 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-30 18:44 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:49 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-30 22:04 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:18 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 00:34 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 06:23 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 02:24 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-31 05:51 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:01 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 13:32 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 18:41 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 13:47 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 11:53 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 15:38 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 13:43 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 12:46 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 13:48 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 13:56 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:00 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 14:04 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:16 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 14:20 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:21 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 14:23 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:27 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 14:35 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:42 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 14:49 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:53 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:14 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 15:20 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:29 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 15:32 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 15:36 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:39 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 16:12 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 16:26 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 16:30 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 16:38 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 16:47 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 16:58 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-30 19:20 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-31 05:46 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-31 11:39 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-31 06:48 -0600
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:28 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:32 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:40 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:42 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:44 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:46 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:33 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:36 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:42 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:45 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:01 -0700
Re: Solastalgia Is The Specific Grief And Anxiety Caused By Climate Change "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-28 11:29 -0800
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 18:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <g8nvjdFnts2U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721361 |
On 12/28/18 6:00 PM, turkey wrote: > On 12/28/2018 7:23 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/28/18 5:13 PM, turkey wrote: >>> On 12/28/2018 7:12 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/28/18 5:08 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/2018 6:59 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:58 PM, % wrote: >>>>> <...> >>>>>>> fear >>>>>> >>>>>> There is that. >>>>>> >>>>> You have a bit of pee-scent on you, mostly >>>>> on your chin. >>>>> >>>> Interesting attempt to dodge the question on why you think some >>>> actively seek to be ignorant about climate science. >>>> >>> Asked and answered. Do try to keep up. >>> >>> >> >> I noted your running... you have no answer other than what I noted: >> those who deny climate science do so as a part of their worship of the >> wealthy. >> >> Fair enough. >> > Try your argument with the Weather Channel, tell them that > what they're doing isn't climate science. Who said they are not engaging in any climate science? But remember: I accept that what every single scientific organization on the planet says is at least largely accurate or, at the very least, based on our best current information. If you accept the science as well not sure what you are disagreeing with. > Please report back. You want me to do research on your own ideas for you. No thanks. But if you find something relevant by all means please share. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | turkey <turkey@invalid.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 20:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <XRzVD.111734$1M.69821@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #721365 |
On 12/28/2018 8:05 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/28/18 6:00 PM, turkey wrote: >> On 12/28/2018 7:23 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/28/18 5:13 PM, turkey wrote: >>>> On 12/28/2018 7:12 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/18 5:08 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/2018 6:59 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:58 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> <...> >>>>>>>> fear >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is that. >>>>>>> >>>>>> You have a bit of pee-scent on you, mostly >>>>>> on your chin. >>>>>> >>>>> Interesting attempt to dodge the question on why you think some >>>>> actively seek to be ignorant about climate science. >>>>> >>>> Asked and answered. Do try to keep up. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I noted your running... you have no answer other than what I noted: >>> those who deny climate science do so as a part of their worship of >>> the wealthy. >>> >>> Fair enough. >>> >> Try your argument with the Weather Channel, tell them that >> what they're doing isn't climate science. > > Who said they are not engaging in any climate science? > You wrote something about only rich people ignore climate science <paraphrasing>. > But remember: I accept that what every single scientific organization on > the planet says > Born every minute.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 19:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <g8o3igFok83U10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721367 |
On 12/28/18 6:12 PM, turkey wrote: > On 12/28/2018 8:05 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/28/18 6:00 PM, turkey wrote: >>> On 12/28/2018 7:23 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/28/18 5:13 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/2018 7:12 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:08 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/28/2018 6:59 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:58 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> <...> >>>>>>>>> fear >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> You have a bit of pee-scent on you, mostly >>>>>>> on your chin. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Interesting attempt to dodge the question on why you think some >>>>>> actively seek to be ignorant about climate science. >>>>>> >>>>> Asked and answered. Do try to keep up. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I noted your running... you have no answer other than what I noted: >>>> those who deny climate science do so as a part of their worship of >>>> the wealthy. >>>> >>>> Fair enough. >>>> >>> Try your argument with the Weather Channel, tell them that >>> what they're doing isn't climate science. >> >> Who said they are not engaging in any climate science? >> > You wrote something about only rich people ignore > climate science <paraphrasing>. I said nothing of the sort. >> But remember: I accept that what every single scientific organization >> on the planet says > > > Born every minute. So you reject the science with pithy sayings. Got it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | turkey <turkey@invalid.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 21:23 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <1VAVD.148659$mU.80850@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #721378 |
On 12/28/2018 9:13 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/28/18 6:12 PM, turkey wrote: <...> >>> But remember: I accept that what every single scientific organization >>> on the planet says >> > >> Born every minute. > > So you reject the science with pithy sayings. Got it. > This is getting old but at any rate you can not "accept that what every single scientific organization on the planet says" because they don't all agree.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 20:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <g8o7ttFpfd1U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721382 |
On 12/28/18 7:23 PM, turkey wrote: > On 12/28/2018 9:13 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/28/18 6:12 PM, turkey wrote: > <...> >>>> But remember: I accept that what every single scientific >>>> organization on the planet says >>> > >>> Born every minute. >> >> So you reject the science with pithy sayings. Got it. >> > > > This is getting old but at any rate you can not > "accept that what every single scientific organization > on the planet says" because they don't all agree. > > > > > > > > > > Please link to the sites of the scientific organizations which reject the general consensus of man-made global climate change, and provide a quote showing their rejection. You can then add their names here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Opposing ----- Since 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[24] no national or international scientific body rejects the findings of human-induced effects on climate change. ----- -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | turkey <turkey@invalid.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 19:06 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <CUyVD.111912$zh6.91854@fx06.iad> |
| In reply to | #721312 |
On 12/28/2018 6:54 PM, Snit wrote: <...> > let us get back to the topic: what do you think > motivates those who actively seek to be ignorant of climate science? > I don't know anyone that doesn't watch the news and weather, so again I can't help you. In fact we have a front moving in this evening, do you suggest I should ignore it? <climate science>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <g8nshlFnbgrU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721320 |
On 12/28/18 5:06 PM, turkey wrote: > On 12/28/2018 6:54 PM, Snit wrote: > <...> >> let us get back to the topic: what do you think motivates those who >> actively seek to be ignorant of climate science? >> > I don't know anyone that doesn't watch the news > and weather, Irrelevant intro. > so again I can't help you. True statement... you have nothing of value to add. I have hit the nail on the head: those who actively remain ignorant about climate science do so as a part of their worship of the very wealthy. Fair enough. > In fact we have a front moving in this evening, do > you suggest I should ignore it? <climate science> Why would you suggest ignoring it? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | turkey <turkey@invalid.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 19:16 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <y1zVD.111916$zh6.39314@fx06.iad> |
| In reply to | #721324 |
On 12/28/2018 7:13 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/28/18 5:06 PM, turkey wrote: > Fair enough. > >> In fact we have a front moving in this evening, do >> you suggest I should ignore it? <climate science> > > Why would you suggest ignoring it? > > Is that not climate science?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <g8nst7FndjaU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721326 |
On 12/28/18 5:16 PM, turkey wrote: > On 12/28/2018 7:13 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/28/18 5:06 PM, turkey wrote: >> Fair enough. >> >>> In fact we have a front moving in this evening, do >>> you suggest I should ignore it? <climate science> >> >> Why would you suggest ignoring it? >> >> > Is that not climate science? > > > > > > Weather is not climate and one can deny what every single scientific organization with a position says and still pay attention to the front. Seems that confuses you. Interesting. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | turkey <turkey@invalid.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 19:34 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <3izVD.195652$hx4.56167@fx04.iad> |
| In reply to | #721329 |
On 12/28/2018 7:19 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/28/18 5:16 PM, turkey wrote: >> On 12/28/2018 7:13 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/28/18 5:06 PM, turkey wrote: >>> Fair enough. >>> >>>> In fact we have a front moving in this evening, do >>>> you suggest I should ignore it? <climate science> >>> >>> Why would you suggest ignoring it? >>> >>> >> Is that not climate science? >> > > Weather is not climate > Say's you. > > and one can deny what every single scientific > organization with a position says and still pay attention to the front. > > Seems that confuses you. Interesting. > Again, I believe in climate science, in fact I need it for business. So I'm not so sure it's *me* that's confused. Do you have a point or do you just do this for shits and giggles? --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <g8nu2jFnlcmU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721341 |
On 12/28/18 5:34 PM, turkey wrote: > On 12/28/2018 7:19 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/28/18 5:16 PM, turkey wrote: >>> On 12/28/2018 7:13 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/28/18 5:06 PM, turkey wrote: >>>> Fair enough. >>>> >>>>> In fact we have a front moving in this evening, do >>>>> you suggest I should ignore it? <climate science> >>>> >>>> Why would you suggest ignoring it? >>>> >>>> >>> Is that not climate science? >>> >> >> Weather is not climate > > > Say's you. > > >> and one can deny what every single scientific organization with a >> position says and still pay attention to the front. >> >> Seems that confuses you. Interesting. >> > Again, I believe in climate science, in fact I need it > for business. > > So I'm not so sure it's *me* that's confused. > > Do you have a point or do you just do this > for shits and giggles? > > I accept that what every single scientific organization on the planet says is at least largely accurate or, at the very least, based on our best current information. If you accept the science as well not sure what you are disagreeing with. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | turkey <turkey@invalid.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 20:04 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <hKzVD.111732$1M.4641@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #721346 |
On 12/28/2018 7:39 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/28/18 5:34 PM, turkey wrote: >> On 12/28/2018 7:19 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/28/18 5:16 PM, turkey wrote: >>>> On 12/28/2018 7:13 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/18 5:06 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>> Fair enough. >>>>> >>>>>> In fact we have a front moving in this evening, do >>>>>> you suggest I should ignore it? <climate science> >>>>> >>>>> Why would you suggest ignoring it? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Is that not climate science? >>>> >>> >>> Weather is not climate >> > >> Say's you. >> > >>> and one can deny what every single scientific organization with a >>> position says and still pay attention to the front. >>> >>> Seems that confuses you. Interesting. >>> >> Again, I believe in climate science, in fact I need it >> for business. >> >> So I'm not so sure it's *me* that's confused. >> >> Do you have a point or do you just do this >> for shits and giggles? >> >> > > > I accept that what every single scientific organization on the planet > says is at least largely accurate or, at the very least, based on our > best current information. > > If you accept the science as well not sure what you are disagreeing with. > We keep agreeing that climate science should not be ignored, without it most people would have almost no warning from an impending hurricane. We're both too young to know how fucked up that had to be.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 18:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <g8o00rFo1noU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721363 |
On 12/28/18 6:04 PM, turkey wrote: > On 12/28/2018 7:39 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/28/18 5:34 PM, turkey wrote: >>> On 12/28/2018 7:19 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/28/18 5:16 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/2018 7:13 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:06 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>>> Fair enough. >>>>>> >>>>>>> In fact we have a front moving in this evening, do >>>>>>> you suggest I should ignore it? <climate science> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why would you suggest ignoring it? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Is that not climate science? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Weather is not climate >>> > >>> Say's you. >>> > >>>> and one can deny what every single scientific organization with a >>>> position says and still pay attention to the front. >>>> >>>> Seems that confuses you. Interesting. >>>> >>> Again, I believe in climate science, in fact I need it >>> for business. >>> >>> So I'm not so sure it's *me* that's confused. >>> >>> Do you have a point or do you just do this >>> for shits and giggles? >>> >>> >> >> >> I accept that what every single scientific organization on the planet >> says is at least largely accurate or, at the very least, based on our >> best current information. >> >> If you accept the science as well not sure what you are disagreeing with. >> > We keep agreeing that climate science should not be ignored, without it > most people would have almost no warning from an impending hurricane. > > We're both too young to know how fucked up that had to be. What about the general consensus on man-made global climate change... do you generally accept or reject what every single scientific organization has concluded and accepted? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | turkey <turkey@invalid.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 20:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <uWzVD.111736$1M.48913@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #721368 |
On 12/28/2018 8:12 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/28/18 6:04 PM, turkey wrote: >> On 12/28/2018 7:39 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/28/18 5:34 PM, turkey wrote: >>>> On 12/28/2018 7:19 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/18 5:16 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/2018 7:13 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:06 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>>>> Fair enough. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In fact we have a front moving in this evening, do >>>>>>>> you suggest I should ignore it? <climate science> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why would you suggest ignoring it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Is that not climate science? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Weather is not climate >>>> > >>>> Say's you. >>>> > >>>>> and one can deny what every single scientific organization with a >>>>> position says and still pay attention to the front. >>>>> >>>>> Seems that confuses you. Interesting. >>>>> >>>> Again, I believe in climate science, in fact I need it >>>> for business. >>>> >>>> So I'm not so sure it's *me* that's confused. >>>> >>>> Do you have a point or do you just do this >>>> for shits and giggles? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> I accept that what every single scientific organization on the planet >>> says is at least largely accurate or, at the very least, based on our >>> best current information. >>> >>> If you accept the science as well not sure what you are disagreeing >>> with. >>> >> We keep agreeing that climate science should not be ignored, without it >> most people would have almost no warning from an impending hurricane. >> >> We're both too young to know how fucked up that had to be. > > What about the general consensus on man-made global climate change... do > you generally accept or reject what every single scientific organization > has concluded and accepted? > > I'm not sure. <shrug> --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 19:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <g8o3hcFok83U9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721370 |
On 12/28/18 6:17 PM, turkey wrote: > On 12/28/2018 8:12 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/28/18 6:04 PM, turkey wrote: >>> On 12/28/2018 7:39 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/28/18 5:34 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/2018 7:19 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:16 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/28/2018 7:13 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:06 PM, turkey wrote: >>>>>>>> Fair enough. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In fact we have a front moving in this evening, do >>>>>>>>> you suggest I should ignore it? <climate science> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why would you suggest ignoring it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is that not climate science? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Weather is not climate >>>>> > >>>>> Say's you. >>>>> > >>>>>> and one can deny what every single scientific organization with a >>>>>> position says and still pay attention to the front. >>>>>> >>>>>> Seems that confuses you. Interesting. >>>>>> >>>>> Again, I believe in climate science, in fact I need it >>>>> for business. >>>>> >>>>> So I'm not so sure it's *me* that's confused. >>>>> >>>>> Do you have a point or do you just do this >>>>> for shits and giggles? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I accept that what every single scientific organization on the >>>> planet says is at least largely accurate or, at the very least, >>>> based on our best current information. >>>> >>>> If you accept the science as well not sure what you are disagreeing >>>> with. >>>> >>> We keep agreeing that climate science should not be ignored, without it >>> most people would have almost no warning from an impending hurricane. >>> >>> We're both too young to know how fucked up that had to be. >> >> What about the general consensus on man-made global climate change... >> do you generally accept or reject what every single scientific >> organization has concluded and accepted? >> >> > I'm not sure. <shrug> > OK, you do not deny the science you are just unsure about it. Do you agree those who better understand it should control the laws about it? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | turkey <turkey@invalid.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 21:19 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <vQAVD.96683$L44.67102@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #721377 |
On 12/28/2018 9:13 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/28/18 6:17 PM, turkey wrote: <...> >>> What about the general consensus on man-made global climate change... >>> do you generally accept or reject what every single scientific >>> organization has concluded and accepted? >>> >>> >> I'm not sure. <shrug> >> > > OK, you do not deny the science you are just unsure about it. > I'm not sure man has been keeping accurate records long enough to trust, and who am I to say the weather isn't a cyclical thing? > > Do you agree those who better understand it should control the laws about it? > No, at one time the so called experts believed the Earth was flat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 20:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <g8o8brFpml9U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721380 |
On 12/28/18 7:19 PM, turkey wrote: > On 12/28/2018 9:13 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/28/18 6:17 PM, turkey wrote: > <...> >>>> What about the general consensus on man-made global climate >>>> change... do you generally accept or reject what every single >>>> scientific organization has concluded and accepted? >>>> >>>> >>> I'm not sure. <shrug> >>> >> >> OK, you do not deny the science you are just unsure about it. > > > I'm not sure man has been keeping accurate records > long enough to trust, and who am I to say the weather > isn't a cyclical thing? The science looks at a LOT more than just the recorded weather. But it is OK if you are not knowledgeable on it... at least you are not denying it. >> Do you agree those who better understand it should control the laws >> about it? >> > No, at one time the so called experts believed the > Earth was flat. When? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 16:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <bs32lp.f6m.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #721311 |
On 2018-12-28 4:40 p.m., turkey wrote: > On 12/28/2018 6:34 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, % wrote: >>> he don't know he's drunk by now >> >> Makes sense >> > You never know, but what doesn't make much sense > is how you can slurp pee-scent the shut-in. > > Are you boosting his poast count? > > > > > > sometimes he does but not much , he just repeats the same ol shit , he said the last time he was here
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <g8ns2pFn98oU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721313 |
On 12/28/18 4:54 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-28 4:40 p.m., turkey wrote: >> On 12/28/2018 6:34 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, % wrote: >>>> he don't know he's drunk by now >>> >>> Makes sense >>> >> You never know, but what doesn't make much sense >> is how you can slurp pee-scent the shut-in. >> >> Are you boosting his poast count? >> >> >> >> >> >> > sometimes he does but not much , > he just repeats the same ol shit , > he said the last time he was here sometimes he does but not much , he just repeats the same ol shit , he said the last time he was here -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 12:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. |
| Message-ID | <q08bb8$1dng$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #721295 |
On 12/28/2018 6:08 PM, benj wrote: > Not only poor but Poor and starving as well. The warmballers all want a > return to the middle ages. Wrong. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web