Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #721225 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-28 11:58 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-28 11:29 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 147 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Solastalgia Is The Specific Grief And Anxiety Caused By Climate Change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 11:58 -0500
Re: Solastalgia Is The Specific Grief And Anxiety Caused By Climate Change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:06 -0700
Re: Solastalgia Is The Specific Grief And Anxiety Caused By Climate Change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:11 -0700
Re: Solastalgia Is The Specific Grief And Anxiety Caused By Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-28 12:15 -0500
Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-28 14:34 -0800
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 15:47 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 17:53 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 15:57 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 18:09 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:10 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:18 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:23 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:38 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:12 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 18:25 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 18:08 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:14 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 18:18 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:20 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:27 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:34 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 18:40 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:54 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:58 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:59 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:00 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:13 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:20 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:29 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:33 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:40 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:42 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:45 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 19:08 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:12 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 19:13 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:23 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 20:00 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:05 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 20:12 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:13 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 21:23 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:27 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 19:06 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:13 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 19:16 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:19 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 19:34 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:39 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 20:04 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:12 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 20:17 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:13 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 21:19 -0500
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:35 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:54 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:05 -0700
Re: Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 12:36 -0500
Snit's apocalypse cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-28 15:58 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:00 -0700
The REAL climate denier. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-28 16:16 -0800
Re: The REAL climate denier. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:18 -0700
Re: The REAL climate denier. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:22 -0800
Science FICTION ( fake news ). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-28 16:34 -0800
Re: Science FICTION ( fake news ). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:39 -0700
Snit needs his apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-28 16:53 -0800
Re: Snit needs his apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:55 -0700
Re: Snit needs his apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 17:06 -0800
Re: Science FICTION ( fake news ). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:42 -0700
Re: The REAL climate denier. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:28 -0700
Re: The REAL climate denier. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:51 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-28 20:49 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:02 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-28 22:18 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:37 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-28 23:19 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 21:25 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-29 21:12 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:33 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-29 21:37 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:52 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-30 10:26 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:08 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-30 13:39 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:52 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 13:56 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-30 16:02 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:50 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-30 18:44 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:49 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-30 22:04 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:18 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 00:34 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 06:23 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 02:24 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-31 05:51 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:01 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 13:32 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 18:41 +0000
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 13:47 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 11:53 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 15:38 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 13:43 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 12:46 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 13:48 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 13:56 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:00 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 14:04 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:16 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 14:20 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:21 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 14:23 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:27 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 14:35 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:42 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 14:49 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 14:53 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:14 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 15:20 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:29 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 15:32 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 15:36 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:39 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 16:12 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 16:26 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 16:30 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 16:38 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 16:47 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 16:58 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-30 19:20 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-31 05:46 -0500
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-31 11:39 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-31 06:48 -0600
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:28 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:32 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:40 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:42 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:44 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:46 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:33 -0800
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:36 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:42 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:45 -0700
Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:01 -0700
Re: Solastalgia Is The Specific Grief And Anxiety Caused By Climate Change "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-28 11:29 -0800
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 15:58 -0800 |
| Subject | Snit's apocalypse cult. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.28--3.58pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #721288 |
Snit replied: > > Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. > > People deny climate science as a part of their worship... Truth can be crippling, and falsehoods can be liberating, -- science FICTION pays better than the REAL deal; hence religion, Marxism and Snit's apocalypse cult. The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. 56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy; then and there, we primates first appeared. 3 million years later, we were most everywhere. 22 million years later, the poles froze. 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. |
| Message-ID | <g8nrovFn73nU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721314 |
On 12/28/18 4:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Snit replied: >>> Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. >> >> People deny climate science as a part of their worship... > > Truth can be crippling, and falsehoods can be liberating, > -- science FICTION pays better than the REAL deal; > hence religion, Marxism and Snit's apocalypse cult. If you disagree with me on something by all means state what... but you just post to try to feel better about yourself. > The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. > > 56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy; > then and there, we primates first appeared. 3 million years later, > we were most everywhere. 22 million years later, the poles froze. > > 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten. Relevance? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 16:16 -0800 |
| Subject | The REAL climate denier. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.28--4.16pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #721317 |
Snit replied: > > Truth can be crippling, and falsehoods can be liberating, > > -- science FICTION pays better than the REAL deal; > > hence religion, Marxism and Snit's apocalypse cult. > > If you disagree with me on something by all means state what... > but you just post to try to feel better about yourself. You need your apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all, and you're welcome to it, just don't expect me to join you. > > The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. > > > > 56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy; > > then and there, we primates first appeared. 3 million years later, > > we were most everywhere. 22 million years later, the poles froze. > > > > 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten. > > Relevance ? Look at the man staring back at you in the mirror; he's the REAL climate denier, not me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The REAL climate denier. |
| Message-ID | <g8nsrgFndjaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721327 |
On 12/28/18 5:16 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Snit replied: >>> Truth can be crippling, and falsehoods can be liberating, >>> -- science FICTION pays better than the REAL deal; >>> hence religion, Marxism and Snit's apocalypse cult. >> >> If you disagree with me on something by all means state what... >> but you just post to try to feel better about yourself. > > You need your apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all, > and you're welcome to it, just don't expect me to join you. > >>> The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. >>> >>> 56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy; >>> then and there, we primates first appeared. 3 million years later, >>> we were most everywhere. 22 million years later, the poles froze. >>> >>> 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten. >> >> Relevance ? > > Look at the man staring back at you in the mirror; > he's the REAL climate denier, not me. > I do not deny the science. I accept that what every single scientific organization on the planet says is at least largely accurate or, at the very least, based on our best current information. If you accept the science as well not sure what you are disagreeing with. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 16:22 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: The REAL climate denier. |
| Message-ID | <mhfd2e5gcttjs70invot8ltsq8te4h97d5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721328 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:18:56 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 12/28/18 5:16 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Snit replied: >>>> Truth can be crippling, and falsehoods can be liberating, >>>> -- science FICTION pays better than the REAL deal; >>>> hence religion, Marxism and Snit's apocalypse cult. >>> >>> If you disagree with me on something by all means state what... >>> but you just post to try to feel better about yourself. >> >> You need your apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all, >> and you're welcome to it, just don't expect me to join you. >> >>>> The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. >>>> >>>> 56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy; >>>> then and there, we primates first appeared. 3 million years later, >>>> we were most everywhere. 22 million years later, the poles froze. >>>> >>>> 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten. >>> >>> Relevance ? >> >> Look at the man staring back at you in the mirror; >> he's the REAL climate denier, not me. >> > >I do not deny the science. I accept that what every single scientific >organization on the planet says is at least largely accurate or, at the >very least, based on our best current information. > >If you accept the science as well not sure what you are disagreeing with. "The focus on guns in this group is by design." -Snit, December 28, 2018
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 16:34 -0800 |
| Subject | Science FICTION ( fake news ). |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.28--4.34pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #721328 |
Snit replied: > > > > The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. > > > > > > > > 56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy; > > > > then and there, we primates first appeared. 3 million years later, > > > > we were most everywhere. 22 million years later, the poles froze. > > > > > > > > 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten. > > > > > > Relevance ? > > > > Look at the man staring back at you in the mirror; > > he's the REAL climate denier, not me. > > I do not deny science FICTION ( fake news ). What about the REAL science (above) ? Truth can be crippling, and falsehoods can be liberating, -- science FICTION pays better than the REAL deal; hence religion, Marxism and Snit's apocalypse cult.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Science FICTION ( fake news ). |
| Message-ID | <g8nu21FnlcmU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721342 |
On 12/28/18 5:34 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Snit replied: >>>>> The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. >>>>> >>>>> 56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy; >>>>> then and there, we primates first appeared. 3 million years later, >>>>> we were most everywhere. 22 million years later, the poles froze. >>>>> >>>>> 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten. >>>> >>>> Relevance ? >>> >>> Look at the man staring back at you in the mirror; >>> he's the REAL climate denier, not me. >> >> I do not deny science FICTION ( fake news ). > > What about the REAL science (above) ? > > Truth can be crippling, and falsehoods can be liberating, > -- science FICTION pays better than the REAL deal; > hence religion, Marxism and Snit's apocalypse cult. > Notice how you snip. Again: I do not deny the science. I accept that what every single scientific organization on the planet says is at least largely accurate or, at the very least, based on our best current information. If you accept the science as well not sure what you are disagreeing with. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 16:53 -0800 |
| Subject | Snit needs his apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.28--4.53pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #721345 |
Science FICTION pays better than the REAL deal; and you (Snit) have bought into it, big time. You need your apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all, and you're welcome to it, just don't expect me to join you. The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. 56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy; then and there, we primates first appeared. 3 million years later, we were most everywhere. 22 million years later, the poles froze. 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit needs his apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all. |
| Message-ID | <g8nv06FnrmcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721359 |
On 12/28/18 5:53 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Science FICTION pays better than the REAL deal; > and you (Snit) have bought into it, big time. > > You need your apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all, > and you're welcome to it, just don't expect me to join you. > > The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. > > 56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy; > then and there, we primates first appeared. 3 million years later, > we were most everywhere. 22 million years later, the poles froze. > > 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten. > I accept that what every single scientific organization on the planet says is at least largely accurate or, at the very least, based on our best current information. If you accept the science as well not sure what you are disagreeing with. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:06 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Snit needs his apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all. |
| Message-ID | <v4id2edqc4q96ivrm0p00oc1j1e5ioj0mp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721360 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:55:33 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >I accept that what every single scientific organization on the planet Still waiting on that cite
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:42 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Science FICTION ( fake news ). |
| Message-ID | <g8nu7lFnlcmU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721342 |
On 12/28/18 5:34 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Snit replied: >>>>> The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. >>>>> >>>>> 56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy; >>>>> then and there, we primates first appeared. 3 million years later, >>>>> we were most everywhere. 22 million years later, the poles froze. >>>>> >>>>> 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten. >>>> >>>> Relevance ? >>> >>> Look at the man staring back at you in the mirror; >>> he's the REAL climate denier, not me. >> >> I do not deny science FICTION ( fake news ). > > What about the REAL science (above) ? > > Truth can be crippling, and falsehoods can be liberating, > -- science FICTION pays better than the REAL deal; > hence religion, Marxism and Snit's apocalypse cult. > I do not deny the science. I accept that what every single scientific organization on the planet says is at least largely accurate or, at the very least, based on our best current information. If you accept the science as well not sure what you are disagreeing with. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The REAL climate denier. |
| Message-ID | <g8ntclFndjaU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721327 |
On 12/28/18 5:16 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Snit replied: >>> Truth can be crippling, and falsehoods can be liberating, >>> -- science FICTION pays better than the REAL deal; >>> hence religion, Marxism and Snit's apocalypse cult. >> >> If you disagree with me on something by all means state what... >> but you just post to try to feel better about yourself. > > You need your apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all, > and you're welcome to it, just don't expect me to join you. Do you think it is wrong to have having basic trust, and a decent understanding, of the scientific conclusions reached by every single scientific organization on the planet (that actually has a stated position)? If so, why? >>> The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. >>> >>> 56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy; >>> then and there, we primates first appeared. 3 million years later, >>> we were most everywhere. 22 million years later, the poles froze. >>> >>> 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten. >> >> Relevance ? > > Look at the man staring back at you in the mirror; > he's the REAL climate denier, not me. You think accepting the science is somehow a sign of denying it. That is quite irrational of you. Interesting how twisted your "logic" has to be to push your religion. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 16:51 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: The REAL climate denier. |
| Message-ID | <r8hd2eh9jg3nevaocjcajimjhfskcte057@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721334 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:28:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Do you think it is wrong to have having basic trust, and a decent >understanding, of the scientific conclusions reached by every single >scientific organization on the planet (that actually has a stated >position)? Still waiting on that cite.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 20:49 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. |
| Message-ID | <g8kd2epp0au9jauas67m7uhvpjne82s7f8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721317 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:00:31 -0700, Snit wrote: >On 12/28/18 4:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Snit replied: >>>> Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. Sadly and wastefully so: <http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/07/the-great-delusion/#more-12926> “We go out of our course to make ourselves uncomfortable; the cup of life is not bitter enough to our palate, and we distill superfluous poison to put into it, or conjure up hideous things to frighten ourselves at, which would never exist if we did not make them.” ... In centuries hence the global warming boogey man will be seen for exactly what it is – The Great Delusion. Future generations will wonder how so many people could have believed something so suicidally ridiculous.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 19:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. |
| Message-ID | <g8o2tpFok83U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721373 |
On 12/28/18 6:49 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:00:31 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 12/28/18 4:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Snit replied: >>>>> Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. > > Sadly and wastefully so: > > <http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/07/the-great-delusion/#more-12926> > “We go out of our course to make ourselves uncomfortable; the cup of > life is not bitter enough to our palate, and we distill superfluous > poison to put into it, or conjure up hideous things to frighten > ourselves at, which would never exist if we did not make them.” > .... > In centuries hence the global warming boogey man will be seen for > exactly what it is – The Great Delusion. Future generations will > wonder how so many people could have believed something so suicidally > ridiculous. > So you deny climate science. Good to know. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 22:18 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. |
| Message-ID | <9mpd2epai18svlmlar20c7ke9q45vpk5vp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721376 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 19:02:33 -0700, Snit wrote: >On 12/28/18 6:49 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:00:31 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 12/28/18 4:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>> Snit replied: >>>>>> Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. >> >> Sadly and wastefully so: >> >> <http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/07/the-great-delusion/#more-12926> >> “We go out of our course to make ourselves uncomfortable; the cup of >> life is not bitter enough to our palate, and we distill superfluous >> poison to put into it, or conjure up hideous things to frighten >> ourselves at, which would never exist if we did not make them.” >> .... >> In centuries hence the global warming boogey man will be seen for >> exactly what it is – The Great Delusion. Future generations will >> wonder how so many people could have believed something so suicidally >> ridiculous. >> > >So you deny climate science. Good to know. So you spew non sequiturs. Not necessarily good to know, just an observation. I don't "deny climate science," I say the FUD derived from climastrology is a crock.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 20:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. |
| Message-ID | <g8o8g7Fpml9U5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721388 |
On 12/28/18 8:18 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 19:02:33 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 12/28/18 6:49 PM, Wally W. wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:00:31 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/28/18 4:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>> Snit replied: >>>>>>> Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. >>> >>> Sadly and wastefully so: >>> >>> <http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/07/the-great-delusion/#more-12926> >>> “We go out of our course to make ourselves uncomfortable; the cup of >>> life is not bitter enough to our palate, and we distill superfluous >>> poison to put into it, or conjure up hideous things to frighten >>> ourselves at, which would never exist if we did not make them.” >>> .... >>> In centuries hence the global warming boogey man will be seen for >>> exactly what it is – The Great Delusion. Future generations will >>> wonder how so many people could have believed something so suicidally >>> ridiculous. >>> >> >> So you deny climate science. Good to know. > > So you spew non sequiturs. Not necessarily good to know, just an > observation. > > I don't "deny climate science," I say the FUD derived from > climastrology is a crock. > What is climastrology? And do you accept the view of every single scientific organization on the planet? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 23:19 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. |
| Message-ID | <0ssd2e1csn4957u8rv0tgav6mpvjc4pbvf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721393 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 20:37:43 -0700, Snit wrote: >On 12/28/18 8:18 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 19:02:33 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 12/28/18 6:49 PM, Wally W. wrote: >>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:00:31 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 12/28/18 4:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>> Snit replied: >>>>>>>> Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. >>>> >>>> Sadly and wastefully so: >>>> >>>> <http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/07/the-great-delusion/#more-12926> >>>> “We go out of our course to make ourselves uncomfortable; the cup of >>>> life is not bitter enough to our palate, and we distill superfluous >>>> poison to put into it, or conjure up hideous things to frighten >>>> ourselves at, which would never exist if we did not make them.” >>>> .... >>>> In centuries hence the global warming boogey man will be seen for >>>> exactly what it is – The Great Delusion. Future generations will >>>> wonder how so many people could have believed something so suicidally >>>> ridiculous. >>>> >>> >>> So you deny climate science. Good to know. >> >> So you spew non sequiturs. Not necessarily good to know, just an >> observation. >> >> I don't "deny climate science," I say the FUD derived from >> climastrology is a crock. >> > >What is climastrology? It was invented to make astrology look respectable. >And do you accept the view of every single scientific organization on >the planet? > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change What is ***the*** view of "every single scientific organization on the planet?" Where do you claim that single, monolithic view exists in the wiki article? Compare with: https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2015/04/07/asking-the-wrong-question/ To ferociously insist – as politicians and activists do – that man-made climate change is real is meaningless. That remark is worthy of a child. It demonstrates no sophistication whatsoever.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 21:25 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. |
| Message-ID | <g8obaoFq88aU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721399 |
On 12/28/18 9:19 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 20:37:43 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 12/28/18 8:18 PM, Wally W. wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 19:02:33 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/28/18 6:49 PM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:00:31 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>> Snit replied: >>>>>>>>> Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. >>>>> >>>>> Sadly and wastefully so: >>>>> >>>>> <http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/07/the-great-delusion/#more-12926> >>>>> “We go out of our course to make ourselves uncomfortable; the cup of >>>>> life is not bitter enough to our palate, and we distill superfluous >>>>> poison to put into it, or conjure up hideous things to frighten >>>>> ourselves at, which would never exist if we did not make them.” >>>>> .... >>>>> In centuries hence the global warming boogey man will be seen for >>>>> exactly what it is – The Great Delusion. Future generations will >>>>> wonder how so many people could have believed something so suicidally >>>>> ridiculous. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So you deny climate science. Good to know. >>> >>> So you spew non sequiturs. Not necessarily good to know, just an >>> observation. >>> >>> I don't "deny climate science," I say the FUD derived from >>> climastrology is a crock. >>> >> >> What is climastrology? > > It was invented to make astrology look respectable. Never heard of it... but I tend to stick to science and avoid astrology and the like. >> And do you accept the view of every single scientific organization on >> the planet? >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change > > What is ***the*** view of "every single scientific organization on the > planet?" From that link: ----- • Earth's climate has warmed significantly since the late 1800s, • Human activities (primarily greenhouse gas emissions) are the primary cause, • Continuing emissions will increase the likelihood and severity of global effects, and that • People could manage future climate change impacts through intense efforts at reducing further warming while preparing for any unavoidable climate changes. ----- > Where do you claim that single, monolithic view exists in the wiki > article? See the quote, above. > Compare with: > https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2015/04/07/asking-the-wrong-question/ > To ferociously insist – as politicians and activists do – that > man-made climate change is real is meaningless. That remark is worthy > of a child. It demonstrates no sophistication whatsoever. > He is on the list of fewer than 70 scientists who deny the general view: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_who_disagree_with_the_scientific_consensus_on_global_warming But I never said those folks did not. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 21:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Snit's apocalypse cult. |
| Message-ID | <d8ag2ep13ric7budpm36bqncmg5ae9aiub@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721400 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:25:59 -0700, Snit wrote: >On 12/28/18 9:19 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 20:37:43 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 12/28/18 8:18 PM, Wally W. wrote: >>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 19:02:33 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 12/28/18 6:49 PM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:00:31 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:58 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>> Snit replied: >>>>>>>>>> Apocalypse Cults are popular for a reason, people _ needed it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sadly and wastefully so: >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/07/the-great-delusion/#more-12926> >>>>>> “We go out of our course to make ourselves uncomfortable; the cup of >>>>>> life is not bitter enough to our palate, and we distill superfluous >>>>>> poison to put into it, or conjure up hideous things to frighten >>>>>> ourselves at, which would never exist if we did not make them.” >>>>>> .... >>>>>> In centuries hence the global warming boogey man will be seen for >>>>>> exactly what it is – The Great Delusion. Future generations will >>>>>> wonder how so many people could have believed something so suicidally >>>>>> ridiculous. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So you deny climate science. Good to know. >>>> >>>> So you spew non sequiturs. Not necessarily good to know, just an >>>> observation. >>>> >>>> I don't "deny climate science," I say the FUD derived from >>>> climastrology is a crock. >>>> >>> >>> What is climastrology? >> >> It was invented to make astrology look respectable. > >Never heard of it... but I tend to stick to science and avoid astrology >and the like. > >>> And do you accept the view of every single scientific organization on >>> the planet? >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change >> >> What is ***the*** view of "every single scientific organization on the >> planet?" > > From that link: >----- >• Earth's climate has warmed significantly since the late 1800s, > >• Human activities (primarily greenhouse gas emissions) are the primary >cause, > >• Continuing emissions will increase the likelihood and severity of >global effects, and that > >• People could manage future climate change impacts through intense >efforts at reducing further warming while preparing for any unavoidable >climate changes. >----- > >> Where do you claim that single, monolithic view exists in the wiki >> article? > >See the quote, above. > >> Compare with: >> https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2015/04/07/asking-the-wrong-question/ >> To ferociously insist – as politicians and activists do – that >> man-made climate change is real is meaningless. That remark is worthy >> of a child. It demonstrates no sophistication whatsoever. >> >He is on the list of fewer than 70 scientists who deny the general view: > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_who_disagree_with_the_scientific_consensus_on_global_warming > >But I never said those folks did not. There are longer lists, including: http://www.petitionproject.org/ 31,487 American scientists have signed this petition
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web