Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #720017 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-21 23:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-12-26 21:06 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 182 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-21 23:42 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-21 17:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-21 19:35 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-21 17:39 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 01:20 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-21 21:16 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 02:30 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-22 10:48 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:50 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 17:22 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 10:24 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 17:21 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-21 21:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-21 22:11 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 04:10 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 08:41 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-22 10:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:57 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 09:20 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:58 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 17:53 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 01:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 19:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-22 23:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 08:57 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-23 09:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 07:22 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 09:10 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:01 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 11:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:55 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:24 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 11:33 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:53 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 10:57 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 22:35 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 20:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 18:11 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-24 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 11:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 15:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 13:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 18:10 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 16:16 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:28 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 17:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:01 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 22:49 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:48 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:32 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:29 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:34 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 16:54 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:41 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 20:32 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 21:00 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 19:45 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:04 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 01:16 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 04:34 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 08:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 10:46 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 08:58 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:31 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:05 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:09 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 12:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-28 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:52 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 13:00 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:28 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 13:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-27 11:19 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 16:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 14:29 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:48 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 15:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:13 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:15 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:47 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 18:02 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-26 19:53 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 13:00 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 13:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:28 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:43 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:39 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 16:11 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 17:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:40 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:22 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-24 23:06 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 19:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 11:31 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:15 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 09:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-22 09:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:12 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 00:13 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-22 10:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:50 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-26 21:15 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 09:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:32 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 19:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:10 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-23 09:12 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:22 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-24 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 19:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:19 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:54 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:01 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:04 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:16 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-26 21:16 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:06 -0500
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 10:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #720740 |
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. The two have different physical properties. While the molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are in constant motion. This means that the air on the outside of a window can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed molecules of the window pane can't move around to do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough to claim the air passes through the window pane so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't cause the window pane to become cold as well as deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold themselves. The entire process is not like an air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no air blowing through anything like it does through a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and oranges in your scientific folly. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 08:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c01836c452ad97a3@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #720781 |
In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > >>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. > >You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. > >The two have different physical properties. While the >molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >in constant motion. > >This means that the air on the outside of a window >can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >molecules of the window pane can't move around to >do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >to claim the air passes through the window pane >so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >cause the window pane to become cold as well as >deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >themselves. The entire process is not like an >air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >air blowing through anything like it does through >a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! > >You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >oranges in your scientific folly. All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 11:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <b3l42elud27hl80c5h34mgivri1unu8nf3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #720784 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >> >>>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>>the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >> >>You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >> >>The two have different physical properties. While the >>molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>in constant motion. >> >>This means that the air on the outside of a window >>can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>to claim the air passes through the window pane >>so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>themselves. The entire process is not like an >>air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>air blowing through anything like it does through >>a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >> >>You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>oranges in your scientific folly. > >All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 09:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c03b73254d94b7a6@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #720785 |
In article <b3l42elud27hl80c5h34mgivri1unu8nf3@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>> >>>>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>>>the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>>fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>> >>>You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>> >>>The two have different physical properties. While the >>>molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>>in constant motion. >>> >>>This means that the air on the outside of a window >>>can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>>a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>>molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>>do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>>a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>>to claim the air passes through the window pane >>>so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>>cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>>deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>>bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>>themselves. The entire process is not like an >>>air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>>air blowing through anything like it does through >>>a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>> >>>You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>>oranges in your scientific folly. >> >>All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >>to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit > >Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. Um, that's what it said. That's fucking cold man!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 11:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2km42epcvmlpe3s7tv1kkbqtr3h920e46l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #720786 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:43 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >In article <b3l42elud27hl80c5h34mgivri1unu8nf3@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>>>>the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>>>fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>> >>>>You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>>> >>>>The two have different physical properties. While the >>>>molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>>>in constant motion. >>>> >>>>This means that the air on the outside of a window >>>>can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>>>a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>>>molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>>>do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>>>a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>>>to claim the air passes through the window pane >>>>so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>>>cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>>>deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>>>bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>>>themselves. The entire process is not like an >>>>air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>>>air blowing through anything like it does through >>>>a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>> >>>>You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>>>oranges in your scientific folly. >>> >>>All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >>>to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit >> >>Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. > >Um, that's what it said. That's fucking cold man! There is one GIANT problem with that theory, however. If there is no movement at all then there is no way to *transfer* the cold so it wouldn't even feel cold. It would be the perfect insulation. A zero degree Kelvin window pane would not be capable of letting any heat out of the window or letting any cold in. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 11:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvtn75$1080$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720792 |
On 12/25/2018 11:30 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:43 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> In article <b3l42elud27hl80c5h34mgivri1unu8nf3@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>>>>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>>>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>>> >>>>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>>>> >>>>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>>>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>>>> in constant motion. >>>>> >>>>> This means that the air on the outside of a window >>>>> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>>>> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>>>> molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>>>> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>>>> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>>>> to claim the air passes through the window pane >>>>> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>>>> cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>>>> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>>>> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>>>> themselves. The entire process is not like an >>>>> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>>>> air blowing through anything like it does through >>>>> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>>> >>>>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>>>> oranges in your scientific folly. >>>> >>>> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >>>> to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit >>> >>> Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. >> >> Um, that's what it said. That's fucking cold man! > > There is one GIANT problem with that theory, > however. If there is no movement at all then > there is no way to *transfer* the cold so it > wouldn't even feel cold. > > It would be the perfect insulation. A zero degree > Kelvin window pane would not be capable of letting > any heat out of the window or letting any cold in. Transparent things allow radiation to pass. That's what being transparent is all about. It doesn't matter what temperature the transparent thing is at. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 12:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2co42e14a28m4cdplb1qi4gfblsp6uba65@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #720799 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 11:51:49 -0500, mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >Transparent things allow radiation to pass. That's what being >transparent is all about. It doesn't matter what temperature the >transparent thing is at. That's got nothing to do with what's being debated. Since there is zero molecular motion or even atomic motion at zero degree Kelvin then there can be no forms of energy transference. Thus, zero degrees Kelvin is the perfect insulation. It's probably what keeps scientists from *seeing* or detecting alternate universes and the other 13 dimensions String Theory talks about. In effect, zero degrees Kelvin is the ultimate barrier. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 09:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c0961149a4066995cd5@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #720801 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <2co42e14a28m4cdplb1qi4gfblsp6uba65@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 11:51:49 -0500, mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@@@ >Transparent things allow radiation to pass. That's what being @@@@@ >transparent is all about. It doesn't matter what temperature the @@@@@ >transparent thing is at. @@@@@ @@@@@ That's got nothing to do with what's being debated. @@@@@ @@@@@ Since there is zero molecular motion or even atomic @@@@@ motion at zero degree Kelvin then there can be no @@@@@ forms of energy transference. Thus, zero degrees @@@@@ Kelvin is the perfect insulation. It's probably what @@@@@ keeps scientists from *seeing* or detecting alternate @@@@@ universes and the other 13 dimensions String Theory @@@@@ talks about. In effect, zero degrees Kelvin is the @@@@@ ultimate barrier. Oh yeah, sure... I think you're really onto something, Professor. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 09:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c03b349d4fef2995ccb@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #720792 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <2km42epcvmlpe3s7tv1kkbqtr3h920e46l@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:43 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: @@@@@ >In article <b3l42elud27hl80c5h34mgivri1unu8nf3@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ >>On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: @@@@@ >>>In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ >>>>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ >>>> @@@@@ >>>>>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of @@@@@ >>>>>the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid @@@@@ >>>>>fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. @@@@@ >>>> @@@@@ >>>>You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. @@@@@ >>>> @@@@@ >>>>The two have different physical properties. While the @@@@@ >>>>molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are @@@@@ >>>>in constant motion. @@@@@ >>>> @@@@@ >>>>This means that the air on the outside of a window @@@@@ >>>>can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with @@@@@ >>>>a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed @@@@@ >>>>molecules of the window pane can't move around to @@@@@ >>>>do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like @@@@@ >>>>a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough @@@@@ >>>>to claim the air passes through the window pane @@@@@ >>>>so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't @@@@@ >>>>cause the window pane to become cold as well as @@@@@ >>>>deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules @@@@@ >>>>bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold @@@@@ >>>>themselves. The entire process is not like an @@@@@ >>>>air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no @@@@@ >>>>air blowing through anything like it does through @@@@@ >>>>a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! @@@@@ >>>> @@@@@ >>>>You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and @@@@@ >>>>oranges in your scientific folly. @@@@@ >>> @@@@@ >>>All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- @@@@@ >>>to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. @@@@@ > @@@@@ >Um, that's what it said. That's fucking cold man! @@@@@ @@@@@ There is one GIANT problem with that theory, @@@@@ however. If there is no movement at all then @@@@@ there is no way to *transfer* the cold so it @@@@@ wouldn't even feel cold. THUD! @@@@@ It would be the perfect insulation. A zero degree @@@@@ Kelvin window pane would not be capable of letting @@@@@ any heat out of the window or letting any cold in. There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? Every week, you manage to say something even more stupid than the week before, and you're either too ignorant or too vain to admit you don't know shit about much of anything. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 12:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ntp42ehgth4c9eo0jcsjubk9sqg7ftr4e6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #720802 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:36 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. >The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, >the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible >to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest >heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? You can't transfer heat unless you have movement. Since there is zero movement at zero degrees Kelvin there can be no transference of heat to matter that is that cold. Absolute zero is a theoretic possibility. Just because humans have not created it or observed it doesn't mean it doesn't or can't exist. Zero degree Kelvin is the perfect insulation because it can't transfer heat (motion). >Every week, you manage to say something even more stupid than the week >before, and you're either too ignorant or too vain to admit you don't >know shit about much of anything. You are just to indoctrinated and your mind is just too small to see the big picture. You are typical in that you place human thought limitations on the universe and the reality that is the universe. Even humans calling it *the universe* is wrong because changes are way better than 50/50 that there are many universes. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 12:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c2d5dc5257052995cd8@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #720807 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <ntp42ehgth4c9eo0jcsjubk9sqg7ftr4e6@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:36 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ @@@@@ >There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. @@@@@ >The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, @@@@@ >the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible @@@@@ >to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest @@@@@ >heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? @@@@@ @@@@@ You can't transfer heat unless you have movement. @@@@@ Since there is zero movement at zero degrees Kelvin @@@@@ there can be no transference of heat to matter that @@@@@ is that cold. @@@@@ @@@@@ Absolute zero is a theoretic possibility. Just because @@@@@ humans have not created it or observed it doesn't @@@@@ mean it doesn't or can't exist. Zero degree Kelvin @@@@@ is the perfect insulation because it can't transfer @@@@@ heat (motion). @@@@@ @@@@@ >Every week, you manage to say something even more stupid than the week @@@@@ >before, and you're either too ignorant or too vain to admit you don't @@@@@ >know shit about much of anything. @@@@@ @@@@@ You are just to indoctrinated and your mind is just too @@@@@ small to see the big picture. You are typical in that @@@@@ you place human thought limitations on the universe @@@@@ and the reality that is the universe. Even humans @@@@@ calling it *the universe* is wrong because changes @@@@@ are way better than 50/50 that there are many @@@@@ universes. Nice unproven technobabble attempt to deflect the fact that you lack even a basic middle school understanding of physics. Please attempt to educate yourself before wasting any more of my time, as It's not my job to tutor you. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 12:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8h9bbF9juoU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #720807 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 12:30:23 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:36 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> > wrote: > >>There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. >>The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, >>the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's >>impossible to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is >>the strongest heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an >>insulator? > > You can't transfer heat unless you have movement. > Since there is zero movement at zero degrees Kelvin there can be no > transference of heat to matter that is that cold. > > Absolute zero is a theoretic possibility. Just because humans have not > created it or observed it doesn't mean it doesn't or can't exist. Zero > degree Kelvin is the perfect insulation because it can't transfer heat > (motion). > >>Every week, you manage to say something even more stupid than the week >>before, and you're either too ignorant or too vain to admit you don't >>know shit about much of anything. > > You are just to indoctrinated and your mind is just too small to see the > big picture. You are typical in that you place human thought limitations > on the universe and the reality that is the universe. Even humans > calling it *the universe* is wrong because changes are way better than > 50/50 that there are many universes. I think you should take this up with Archimedes Plutonium -- a meeting of the greatest minds, if you will. cmsg newgroup alt.checkmate.crackpot-jungle y For your newsgroups file: alt.checkmate.crackpot-jungle Where Gerg can expound on his crackpot ideas -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q02v9v$1ib6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720807 |
On 12/25/2018 12:30 PM, stinky puddles piddled more physics wallbangers: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:36 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > >> There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. >> The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, >> the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible >> to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest >> heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? > > You can't transfer heat unless you have movement. > Since there is zero movement at zero degrees Kelvin > there can be no transference of heat to matter that > is that cold. *headdesk* Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would be made extremely cold. *looks up at timestamp* *does a double take* THIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed nuts, Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. > Absolute zero is a theoretic possibility. Just because > humans have not created it or observed it doesn't > mean it doesn't or can't exist. Zero degree Kelvin > is the perfect insulation because it can't transfer > heat (motion). *headdesk* *headdesk* *headdesk* >> Every week, you manage to say something even more stupid than the week >> before, and you're either too ignorant or too vain to admit you don't >> know shit about much of anything. Little Fakey Jr. is about to disappear up his own tailpipe. With assistance, if necessary. :P > You are just to indoctrinated *headdesk* > Even humans calling it *the universe* is wrong because changes > are way better than 50/50 that there are many universes. And here I thought you'd finally had your stopped clock moment. Then I saw the typo. *headdesk* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v11a2etes5d15n9bh0eavssu3bg08t1c5q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721079 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 12/25/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. eruditely stated that... >> On Tue, 25 Dec 2018, teh Checktard <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >> >>> There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. >>> The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, >>> the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible >>> to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest >>> heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? >> >> You can't transfer heat unless you have movement. >> Since there is zero movement at zero degrees Kelvin >> there can be no transference of heat to matter that >> is that cold. > >*headdesk* > >Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would >be made extremely cold. But, there would be no pane at zero degrees Kelvin. The pane exists as it is observed due to the fact that its molecules are in constant motion. Take all that motion away and the pane goes away. "Try to remember that there is no spoon." - Matrix young potential. >*looks up at timestamp* >*does a double take* > >THIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad >physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the >Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed nuts, >Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. Skeetard jointly. LOL! Good one little kensi >> Absolute zero is a theoretic possibility. Just because >> humans have not created it or observed it doesn't >> mean it doesn't or can't exist. Zero degree Kelvin >> is the perfect insulation because it can't transfer >> heat (motion). > >*headdesk* >*headdesk* >*headdesk* It cannot. No motion = the death of matter as matter is defined by motion. >>> Every week, you manage to say something even more stupid than the week >>> before, and you're either too ignorant or too vain to admit you don't >>> know shit about much of anything. > >Little Fakey Jr. is about to disappear up his own tailpipe. With >assistance, if necessary. :P Nice threat of physical violence from a claimed pacifist noted. >> You are just too indoctrinated > >*headdesk* Well, you are. You have many years of indoctrination which you call *higher education*. You have no original thoughts - you only parrot your indoctrination. >> Even humans calling it *the universe* is wrong because chances >> are way better than 50/50 that there are many universes. > >And here I thought you'd finally had your stopped clock moment. Then I >saw the typo. I think you need glasses. What typo? >*headdesk* I'd rather you laid your head in my lap. Face down. LOL! -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 10:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brvmho.4tm.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #721092 |
On 2018-12-27 10:07 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 12/25/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. eruditely stated that... >>> On Tue, 25 Dec 2018, teh Checktard <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>> >>>> There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. >>>> The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, >>>> the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible >>>> to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest >>>> heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? >>> >>> You can't transfer heat unless you have movement. >>> Since there is zero movement at zero degrees Kelvin >>> there can be no transference of heat to matter that >>> is that cold. >> >> *headdesk* >> >> Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would >> be made extremely cold. > > But, there would be no pane at zero degrees Kelvin. > The pane exists as it is observed due to the fact > that its molecules are in constant motion. Take all > that motion away and the pane goes away. > > "Try to remember that there is no spoon." - Matrix > young potential. > >> *looks up at timestamp* >> *does a double take* >> >> THIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad >> physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the >> Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed nuts, >> Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. > > Skeetard jointly. LOL! Good one little kensi > >>> Absolute zero is a theoretic possibility. Just because >>> humans have not created it or observed it doesn't >>> mean it doesn't or can't exist. Zero degree Kelvin >>> is the perfect insulation because it can't transfer >>> heat (motion). >> >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* > > It cannot. No motion = the death of matter as matter > is defined by motion. > >>>> Every week, you manage to say something even more stupid than the week >>>> before, and you're either too ignorant or too vain to admit you don't >>>> know shit about much of anything. >> >> Little Fakey Jr. is about to disappear up his own tailpipe. With >> assistance, if necessary. :P > > Nice threat of physical violence from a claimed pacifist > noted. > >>> You are just too indoctrinated >> >> *headdesk* > > Well, you are. You have many years of indoctrination > which you call *higher education*. You have no original > thoughts - you only parrot your indoctrination. > >>> Even humans calling it *the universe* is wrong because chances >>> are way better than 50/50 that there are many universes. >> >> And here I thought you'd finally had your stopped clock moment. Then I >> saw the typo. > > I think you need glasses. What typo? > >> *headdesk* > > I'd rather you laid your head in my lap. Face down. > > LOL! > leave the headdesk alone that's where i get my knob sucked
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368efabafde34cf4995d2e@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #721093 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <brvmho.4tm.17.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... < < On 2018-12-27 10:07 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: < > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: < >> On 12/25/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. eruditely stated that... < >>> On Tue, 25 Dec 2018, teh Checktard <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: < >>> < >>>> There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. < >>>> The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, < >>>> the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible < >>>> to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest < >>>> heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? < >>> < >>> You can't transfer heat unless you have movement. < >>> Since there is zero movement at zero degrees Kelvin < >>> there can be no transference of heat to matter that < >>> is that cold. < >> < >> *headdesk* < >> < >> Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would < >> be made extremely cold. < > < > But, there would be no pane at zero degrees Kelvin. < > The pane exists as it is observed due to the fact < > that its molecules are in constant motion. Take all < > that motion away and the pane goes away. < > < > "Try to remember that there is no spoon." - Matrix < > young potential. < > < >> *looks up at timestamp* < >> *does a double take* < >> < >> THIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad < >> physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the < >> Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed nuts, < >> Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. < > < > Skeetard jointly. LOL! Good one little kensi < > < >>> Absolute zero is a theoretic possibility. Just because < >>> humans have not created it or observed it doesn't < >>> mean it doesn't or can't exist. Zero degree Kelvin < >>> is the perfect insulation because it can't transfer < >>> heat (motion). < >> < >> *headdesk* < >> *headdesk* < >> *headdesk* < > < > It cannot. No motion = the death of matter as matter < > is defined by motion. < > < >>>> Every week, you manage to say something even more stupid than the week < >>>> before, and you're either too ignorant or too vain to admit you don't < >>>> know shit about much of anything. < >> < >> Little Fakey Jr. is about to disappear up his own tailpipe. With < >> assistance, if necessary. :P < > < > Nice threat of physical violence from a claimed pacifist < > noted. < > < >>> You are just too indoctrinated < >> < >> *headdesk* < > < > Well, you are. You have many years of indoctrination < > which you call *higher education*. You have no original < > thoughts - you only parrot your indoctrination. < > < >>> Even humans calling it *the universe* is wrong because chances < >>> are way better than 50/50 that there are many universes. < >> < >> And here I thought you'd finally had your stopped clock moment. Then I < >> saw the typo. < > < > I think you need glasses. What typo? < > < >> *headdesk* < > < > I'd rather you laid your head in my lap. Face down. < > < > LOL! < > < leave the headdesk alone that's where i get my knob sucked Yeah, but I made Gurgles foam about stupid shit and get lectured by The Kensi, so it worked out well. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q032p5$2fi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #721092 |
On 12/27/2018 12:07 PM, stinky puddles piddled: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> *headdesk* >> >> Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would >> be made extremely cold. > > But, there would be no pane at zero degrees Kelvin. > The pane exists as it is observed due to the fact > that its molecules are in constant motion. Take all > that motion away and the pane goes away. *headdesk* > It cannot. No motion = the death of matter as matter > is defined by motion. *headdesk* Matter is defined by nonzero rest mass... >> Little Fakey Jr. is about to disappear up his own tailpipe. With >> assistance, if necessary. :P > > Nice threat of physical violence from a claimed pacifist MID, ko0k? >>> You are just too indoctrinated >> >> *headdesk* > > Well, you are. You have many years of indoctrination > which you call *higher education*. You have no original > thoughts - you only parrot your indoctrination. I have a Ph.D. ... and you don't get one of those without contributing original research in your field, kOok. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <t24a2edeme5gf45if8vppde4bb32fl1ql3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721113 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:39:51 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 12/27/2018 12:07 PM, stinky puddles piddled: >> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> *headdesk* >>> >>> Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would >>> be made extremely cold. >> >> But, there would be no pane at zero degrees Kelvin. >> The pane exists as it is observed due to the fact >> that its molecules are in constant motion. Take all >> that motion away and the pane goes away. > >*headdesk* > >> It cannot. No motion = the death of matter as matter >> is defined by motion. > >*headdesk* > >Matter is defined by nonzero rest mass... > >>> Little Fakey Jr. is about to disappear up his own tailpipe. With >>> assistance, if necessary. :P >> >> Nice threat of physical violence from a claimed pacifist > >MID, ko0k? > >>>> You are just too indoctrinated >>> >>> *headdesk* >> >> Well, you are. You have many years of indoctrination >> which you call *higher education*. You have no original >> thoughts - you only parrot your indoctrination. > >I have a Ph.D. ... and you don't get one of those without contributing >original research in your field, kOok. A Doctor of Philosophy? What kind of a qualification is philosophy for science? Seems to me one is anathema to the other... -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 12:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q05m3i$1lt2$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #721121 |
On 12/27/2018 12:49 PM, stinky puddles piddled: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:39:51 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> I have a Ph.D. ... and you don't get one of those without contributing >> original research in your field, kOok. > > A Doctor of Philosophy? What kind of a qualification > is philosophy for science? > > Seems to me one is anathema to the other... Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.369009ec6281536783a@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #721240 |
In article <q05m3i$1lt2$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 12/27/2018 12:49 PM, stinky puddles piddled: >> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:39:51 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> I have a Ph.D. ... and you don't get one of those without contributing >>> original research in your field, kOok. >> >> A Doctor of Philosophy? What kind of a qualification >> is philosophy for science? >> >> Seems to me one is anathema to the other... > >Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... You allow uneducated babbling to pain you? No self control?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web