Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #720017 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-21 23:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-12-26 21:06 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 182 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-21 23:42 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-21 17:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-21 19:35 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-21 17:39 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 01:20 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-21 21:16 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 02:30 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-22 10:48 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:50 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 17:22 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 10:24 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 17:21 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-21 21:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-21 22:11 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 04:10 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 08:41 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-22 10:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:57 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 09:20 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:58 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 17:53 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 01:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 19:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-22 23:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 08:57 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-23 09:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 07:22 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 09:10 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:01 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 11:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:55 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:24 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 11:33 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:53 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 10:57 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 22:35 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 20:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 18:11 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-24 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 11:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 15:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 13:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 18:10 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 16:16 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:28 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 17:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:01 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 22:49 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:48 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:32 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:29 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:34 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 16:54 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:41 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 20:32 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 21:00 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 19:45 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:04 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 01:16 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 04:34 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 08:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 10:46 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 08:58 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:31 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:05 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:09 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 12:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-28 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:52 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 13:00 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:28 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 13:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-27 11:19 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 16:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 14:29 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:48 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 15:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:13 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:15 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:47 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 18:02 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-26 19:53 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 13:00 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 13:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:28 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:43 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:39 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 16:11 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 17:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:40 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:22 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-24 23:06 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 19:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 11:31 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:15 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 09:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-22 09:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:12 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 00:13 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-22 10:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:50 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-26 21:15 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 09:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:32 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 19:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:10 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-23 09:12 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:22 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-24 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 19:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:19 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:54 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:01 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:04 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:16 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-26 21:16 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:06 -0500
Page 6 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 10 Next page →
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 12:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8snc2e9mepceb4kalf4492v265840rcnr2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721240 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:21:58 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: <...> >Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... You ain't seen pain the likes of which you will see if you don't stop disrespecting me. <rosins up the cane switch> -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs2de1.oad.17.10@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #721245 |
On 2018-12-28 10:40 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:21:58 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > <...> > >> Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... > > You ain't seen pain the likes of which you will > see if you don't stop disrespecting me. > > <rosins up the cane switch> > fk you frack face
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 13:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q08cnv$1dng$8@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #721245 |
On 12/28/2018 12:40 PM, stinky puddles piddled: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:21:58 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > <...> > >> Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... > > You ain't seen pain the likes of which you will > see if you don't stop disrespecting me. > > <rosins up the cane switch> K0oKthR3At!!1! -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 10:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368eb9adb10f5941995d28@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #721092 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <v11a2etes5d15n9bh0eavssu3bg08t1c5q@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... < <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: < >> < >>> There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. < >>> The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, < >>> the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible < >>> to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest < >>> heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? < >> < >> You can't transfer heat unless you have movement. < >> Since there is zero movement at zero degrees Kelvin < >> there can be no transference of heat to matter that < >> is that cold. < > < >*headdesk* < > < >Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would < >be made extremely cold. < < But, there would be no pane at zero degrees Kelvin. < The pane exists as it is observed due to the fact < that its molecules are in constant motion. Take all < that motion away and the pane goes away. < Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 13:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q036o1$kgv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #721079 |
On 12/27/2018 11:40 AM, kensi wrote: > HIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad > physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the > Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed nuts, > Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. Leave me out of this. I make a living doing physics. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <q038jq$3tc$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #721134 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/27/2018 10:47 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/27/2018 11:40 AM, kensi wrote: >> HIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad >> physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the >> Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed >> nuts, Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. > > Leave me out of this. I make a living doing physics. Dude, if you don't want your award, give it to me, I'll take it. You should see my collection of KOTMs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brvudh.185.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #721134 |
On 2018-12-27 11:47 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/27/2018 11:40 AM, kensi wrote: >> HIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad >> physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the >> Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed >> nuts, Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. > > Leave me out of this. I make a living doing physics. > i'm watching the council meeting , you could be one of these guys
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 16:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q03g4j$1v1u$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #721140 |
On 12/27/2018 2:23 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-27 11:47 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: >> On 12/27/2018 11:40 AM, kensi wrote: >>> HIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming >>> bad physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the >>> Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed >>> nuts, Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. >> >> Leave me out of this. I make a living doing physics. >> > i'm watching the council meeting , > you could be one of these guys Looks like Mayor Al has it under control. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 14:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs05ou.v1k.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #721151 |
On 2018-12-27 2:27 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/27/2018 2:23 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-27 11:47 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>> On 12/27/2018 11:40 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> HIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming >>>> bad physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for >>>> the Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, >>>> mixed nuts, Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. >>> >>> Leave me out of this. I make a living doing physics. >>> >> i'm watching the council meeting , >> you could be one of these guys > > Looks like Mayor Al has it under control. > he's the new guy his family is half the population here
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368efa4bb747d519995d2d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #721079 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q02v9v$1ib6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... < Subject: Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction < From: kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> < Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate < < < < < On 12/25/2018 12:30 PM, stinky puddles piddled more physics wallbangers: < > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:36 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: < > < >> There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. < >> The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, < >> the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible < >> to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest < >> heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? < > < > You can't transfer heat unless you have movement. < > Since there is zero movement at zero degrees Kelvin < > there can be no transference of heat to matter that < > is that cold. < < *headdesk* < < Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would < be made extremely cold. < < *looks up at timestamp* < *does a double take* < < THIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad < physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the < Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed nuts, < Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. < Except that I only bothered to poast for a short while that morning. You may note that I also predicted that some Ko0k (you, apparently) would try to make a big deal out of that and babble some bullshit about non- existent "awards" as if there was a law against poasting on holidays or something. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 10:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvtu12$6jq$9@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #720802 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/25/2018 9:07 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <2km42epcvmlpe3s7tv1kkbqtr3h920e46l@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:43 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > @@@@@ >In article <b3l42elud27hl80c5h34mgivri1unu8nf3@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > @@@@@ >>On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > @@@@@ >>>In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > @@@@@ >>>>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>>>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of > @@@@@ >>>>>the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid > @@@@@ >>>>>fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>>You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>>The two have different physical properties. While the > @@@@@ >>>>molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are > @@@@@ >>>>in constant motion. > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>>This means that the air on the outside of a window > @@@@@ >>>>can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with > @@@@@ >>>>a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed > @@@@@ >>>>molecules of the window pane can't move around to > @@@@@ >>>>do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like > @@@@@ >>>>a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough > @@@@@ >>>>to claim the air passes through the window pane > @@@@@ >>>>so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't > @@@@@ >>>>cause the window pane to become cold as well as > @@@@@ >>>>deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules > @@@@@ >>>>bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold > @@@@@ >>>>themselves. The entire process is not like an > @@@@@ >>>>air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no > @@@@@ >>>>air blowing through anything like it does through > @@@@@ >>>>a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>>You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and > @@@@@ >>>>oranges in your scientific folly. > @@@@@ >>> > @@@@@ >>>All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- > @@@@@ >>>to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >>Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ >Um, that's what it said. That's fucking cold man! > @@@@@ > @@@@@ There is one GIANT problem with that theory, > @@@@@ however. If there is no movement at all then > @@@@@ there is no way to *transfer* the cold so it > @@@@@ wouldn't even feel cold. > > THUD! > > > @@@@@ It would be the perfect insulation. A zero degree > @@@@@ Kelvin window pane would not be capable of letting > @@@@@ any heat out of the window or letting any cold in. > > There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. > The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, > the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible > to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest > heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? > > Every week, you manage to say something even more stupid than the week > before, and you're either too ignorant or too vain to admit you don't > know shit about much of anything. He does a good job of winding you up, though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 12:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c3032503991dd7a9@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #720792 |
In article <2km42epcvmlpe3s7tv1kkbqtr3h920e46l@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:43 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>In article <b3l42elud27hl80c5h34mgivri1unu8nf3@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>>>>>the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>>>>fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>>> >>>>>You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>>>> >>>>>The two have different physical properties. While the >>>>>molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>>>>in constant motion. >>>>> >>>>>This means that the air on the outside of a window >>>>>can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>>>>a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>>>>molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>>>>do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>>>>a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>>>>to claim the air passes through the window pane >>>>>so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>>>>cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>>>>deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>>>>bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>>>>themselves. The entire process is not like an >>>>>air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>>>>air blowing through anything like it does through >>>>>a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>>> >>>>>You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>>>>oranges in your scientific folly. >>>> >>>>All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >>>>to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit >>> >>>Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. >> >>Um, that's what it said. That's fucking cold man! > >There is one GIANT problem with that theory, >however. If there is no movement at all then >there is no way to *transfer* the cold so it >wouldn't even feel cold. It's not a theory, it's a fact. <sound like Nads now> > >It would be the perfect insulation. A zero degree >Kelvin window pane would not be capable of letting >any heat out of the window or letting any cold in.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 15:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tc352edqmm38059tk4nn68v2bslignj2qr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #720834 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 12:17:32 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: <...> >It's not a theory, it's a fact. <sound like Nads now> Speaking of Nads, have you noticed that since kensi announced she was going on Christmas vacation and wouldn't be posting for a while that Nads suddenly disappeared, too, at the very same time. LOL! -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q02vdd$1ib6$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720845 |
On 12/25/2018 3:07 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 12:17:32 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > <...> > >> It's not a theory, it's a fact. <sound like Nads now> > > Speaking of Nads, have you noticed that since kensi > announced she was going on Christmas vacation and > wouldn't be posting for a while that Nads suddenly > disappeared, too, at the very same time. Christmas is celebrated on the same day in Arizona and in New York, genius. :P -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ft1a2ets2nmk6smghvbam8ig0ltihrpm1k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721080 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 12/25/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Dec 2018, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >>> It's not a theory, it's a fact. <sound like Nads now> >> >> Speaking of Nads, have you noticed that since kensi >> announced she was going on Christmas vacation and >> wouldn't be posting for a while that Nads suddenly >> disappeared, too, at the very same time. > >Christmas is celebrated on the same day in Arizona and in New York, >genius. :P New York? But, didn't you promise us you'd be in Helsinki by Christmas? That means your Christmas was celebrated about ten hours earlier than Nads'. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 10:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brvmtk.bpr.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #721095 |
On 2018-12-27 10:13 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 12/25/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Tue, 25 Dec 2018, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> <...> >>> >>>> It's not a theory, it's a fact. <sound like Nads now> >>> >>> Speaking of Nads, have you noticed that since kensi >>> announced she was going on Christmas vacation and >>> wouldn't be posting for a while that Nads suddenly >>> disappeared, too, at the very same time. >> >> Christmas is celebrated on the same day in Arizona and in New York, >> genius. :P > > New York? But, didn't you promise us you'd be in > Helsinki by Christmas? That means your Christmas > was celebrated about ten hours earlier than Nads'. > and you never had one at all because no one can or wants to be near you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q032r4$2fi$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #721095 |
On 12/27/2018 12:13 PM, stinky puddles piddled: > New York? But, didn't you promise us you'd be in > Helsinki by Christmas? No, I said early in the new year. It isn't the new year yet, idiot. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 08:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368bfeff8c660784995cc8@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #720785 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <b3l42elud27hl80c5h34mgivri1unu8nf3@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: @@@@@ >In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ >>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of @@@@@ >>>the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid @@@@@ >>>fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>The two have different physical properties. While the @@@@@ >>molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are @@@@@ >>in constant motion. @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>This means that the air on the outside of a window @@@@@ >>can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with @@@@@ >>a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed @@@@@ >>molecules of the window pane can't move around to @@@@@ >>do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like @@@@@ >>a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough @@@@@ >>to claim the air passes through the window pane @@@@@ >>so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't @@@@@ >>cause the window pane to become cold as well as @@@@@ >>deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules @@@@@ >>bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold @@@@@ >>themselves. The entire process is not like an @@@@@ >>air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no @@@@@ >>air blowing through anything like it does through @@@@@ >>a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and @@@@@ >>oranges in your scientific folly. @@@@@ > @@@@@ >All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- @@@@@ >to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit @@@@@ @@@@@ Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. That's what he just said, idiot, but no one has ever successfully reached Absolute Zero, so glass molecules vibrate in proportion to the amount of heat they contain. It's not too late for you to go get a G.E.D. It might help you keep up in here. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 11:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvtmve$ur9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720785 |
On 12/25/2018 11:02 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>> >>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>> >>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>> >>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>> in constant motion. >>> >>> This means that the air on the outside of a window >>> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>> molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>> to claim the air passes through the window pane >>> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>> cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>> themselves. The entire process is not like an >>> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>> air blowing through anything like it does through >>> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>> >>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>> oranges in your scientific folly. >> >> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >> to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit > > Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. Electromagneticism, for instance, can't stop so there's always a zero point potential energy that can't be removed. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 10:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brqght.s0c.19.13@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #720797 |
On 2018-12-25 9:47 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/25/2018 11:02 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >> wrote: >>> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate >>>> <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer >>>>> side of >>>>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>> >>>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>>> >>>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>>> in constant motion. >>>> >>>> This means that the air on the outside of a window >>>> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>>> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>>> molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>>> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>>> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>>> to claim the air passes through the window pane >>>> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>>> cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>>> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>>> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>>> themselves. The entire process is not like an >>>> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>>> air blowing through anything like it does through >>>> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>> >>>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>>> oranges in your scientific folly. >>> >>> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >>> to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit >> >> Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. > > Electromagneticism, for instance, can't stop so there's always a zero > point potential energy that can't be removed. > what if i turn off the linear
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web