Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #720398 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-23 11:00 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-23 21:14 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 75 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The most important thing you can do to fight climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:00 -0500
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-23 09:04 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 10:24 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-23 12:25 -0500
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-23 19:12 -0600
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:09 -0500
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-23 11:18 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:44 -0500
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-23 11:58 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:04 -0500
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 11:08 -0800
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-23 19:21 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-23 13:01 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-23 23:27 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 16:34 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-23 18:57 -0600
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-23 18:01 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-23 17:11 -0800
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-23 18:14 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-23 17:18 -0800
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-24 02:22 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-23 19:54 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-24 06:15 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 07:08 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-24 17:41 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 10:48 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 10:49 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-24 20:32 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:49 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 14:06 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:24 -0500
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 10:35 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 09:09 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 14:09 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-24 13:20 -0800
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-24 21:50 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-24 14:05 -0800
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:10 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-24 23:27 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:40 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-24 17:59 -0600
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 17:27 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 08:00 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-24 23:49 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 17:26 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-12-24 18:57 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:09 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 13:44 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:49 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 14:07 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 14:11 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 14:17 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 14:20 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 14:27 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 14:38 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:10 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 16:15 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:19 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 16:23 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:41 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 23:55 -0800
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 23:54 -0800
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-12-25 09:05 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 21:13 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-23 21:31 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-23 20:33 -0800
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 07:08 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 05:45 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 22:39 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 07:08 +0000
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 05:44 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 20:34 -0800
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 22:40 -0700
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 19:25 -0800
Re: The most important thing you can do to fight climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 21:14 -0700
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 02:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0gs5ff-g8p.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #720478 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>> >>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >> >> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >> > > You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate > science. I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in the real world. > Interesting. No, you are not, just another babbling troll. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-23 19:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8b03fFu41tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #720487 |
On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>> >>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>> >>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>> >> >> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >> science. > > I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in > the real world. > >> Interesting. > > No, you are not, just another babbling troll. > See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change is beyond you. Amazing to watch. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 06:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4a6ff-mfq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #720491 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>> >>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>> >>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>> >>> >>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>> science. >> >> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >> the real world. >> >>> Interesting. >> >> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >> > > See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about > yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change > is beyond you. > > Amazing to watch. Yet another babbling troll; QED. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 07:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8bevdF2h5vU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #720526 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>> >>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>> science. >>> >>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>> the real world. >>> >>>> Interesting. >>> >>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>> >> >> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >> is beyond you. >> >> Amazing to watch. > > Yet another babbling troll; QED. > > More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel better about yourself. Wow.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 17:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7bi7ff-v91.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #720527 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>> >>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>>> science. >>>> >>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>> the real world. >>>> >>>>> Interesting. >>>> >>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>> >>> >>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >>> is beyond you. >>> >>> Amazing to watch. >> >> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >> >> > > More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel > better about yourself. Wow. Non sequitur troll. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 10:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brnrmg.fl7.19.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #720595 |
On 2018-12-24 10:41 a.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>>>> science. >>>>> >>>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>>> the real world. >>>>> >>>>>> Interesting. >>>>> >>>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>>> >>>> >>>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >>>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >>>> is beyond you. >>>> >>>> Amazing to watch. >>> >>> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >>> >>> >> >> More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel >> better about yourself. Wow. > > Non sequitur troll. > what's a jimp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 10:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8ckh4Fac35U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #720595 |
On 12/24/18 10:41 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>>>> science. >>>>> >>>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>>> the real world. >>>>> >>>>>> Interesting. >>>>> >>>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>>> >>>> >>>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >>>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >>>> is beyond you. >>>> >>>> Amazing to watch. >>> >>> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >>> >>> >> >> More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel >> better about yourself. Wow. > > Non sequitur troll. > Is that what you call yourself? I suppose it fits... but I can think of better. :) Seriously, though, instead of focusing on you I prefer to stick to the topic. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 20:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fcs7ff-962.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #720598 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 12/24/18 10:41 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>>>>> science. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>>>> the real world. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Interesting. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >>>>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >>>>> is beyond you. >>>>> >>>>> Amazing to watch. >>>> >>>> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel >>> better about yourself. Wow. >> >> Non sequitur troll. >> > > Is that what you call yourself? I suppose it fits... but I can think of > better. :) An I know you are but what am I response? A puerile troll. > Seriously, though, instead of focusing on you I prefer to stick to the > topic. What topic is that? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 13:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bro6ar.lcs.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #720662 |
On 2018-12-24 1:32 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 12/24/18 10:41 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>>>>>> science. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>>>>> the real world. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Interesting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >>>>>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >>>>>> is beyond you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Amazing to watch. >>>>> >>>>> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel >>>> better about yourself. Wow. >>> >>> Non sequitur troll. >>> >> >> Is that what you call yourself? I suppose it fits... but I can think of >> better. :) > > An I know you are but what am I response? > > A puerile troll. > >> Seriously, though, instead of focusing on you I prefer to stick to the >> topic. > > What topic is that? > the investigation of what is a jimp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 14:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8d03jFcqdqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #720667 |
On 12/24/18 1:49 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-24 1:32 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 12/24/18 10:41 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate >>>>>>>>>>>>> change? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and >>>>>>>>>> demonstrates major bias. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to >>>>>>>>> denying climate >>>>>>>>> science. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>>>>>> the real world. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Interesting. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better >>>>>>> about >>>>>>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate >>>>>>> change >>>>>>> is beyond you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amazing to watch. >>>>>> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel >>>>> better about yourself. Wow. >>>> Non sequitur troll. >>>> >>> >>> Is that what you call yourself? I suppose it fits... but I can think of >>> better. :) >> >> An I know you are but what am I response? >> >> A puerile troll. >> >>> Seriously, though, instead of focusing on you I prefer to stick to the >>> topic. >> >> What topic is that? >> > the investigation of what is a jimp A Linux image editor? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q031se$1ib6$12@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720671 |
On 12/24/2018 4:06 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/24/18 1:49 PM, % wrote: >> the investigation of what is a jimp > > A Linux image editor? Nah, that's GIMP, the difference being that GIMP is actually useful. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 10:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8kgqgF105rU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #721104 |
On 12/27/18 10:24 AM, kensi wrote: > On 12/24/2018 4:06 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/24/18 1:49 PM, % wrote: >>> the investigation of what is a jimp >> >> A Linux image editor? > > Nah, that's GIMP, the difference being that GIMP is actually useful. > > *snicker* > For being free it is actually pretty amazing. No Photoshop but, well, also not hundreds of dollars. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 09:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368ff8c3b5b97f07818@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #721104 |
In article <q031se$1ib6$12@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 12/24/2018 4:06 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/24/18 1:49 PM, % wrote: >>> the investigation of what is a jimp >> >> A Linux image editor? > >Nah, that's GIMP, the difference being that GIMP is actually useful. > >*snicker* Yea, if you want him to walk in circles.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 14:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8d07vFcqdqU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #720662 |
On 12/24/18 1:32 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 12/24/18 10:41 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>>>>>> science. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>>>>> the real world. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Interesting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >>>>>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >>>>>> is beyond you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Amazing to watch. >>>>> >>>>> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel >>>> better about yourself. Wow. >>> >>> Non sequitur troll. >>> >> >> Is that what you call yourself? I suppose it fits... but I can think of >> better. :) > > An I know you are but what am I response? > > A puerile troll. > >> Seriously, though, instead of focusing on you I prefer to stick to the >> topic. > > What topic is that? > You admit you have been trolling so much you do not even know what topic you are working to disrupt, and then seem shocked when your term "Non sequitur troll" was assumed to be your name for yourself. You just won the "Unintentionally Funny Post of the Day" award. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 13:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <29j22e5ll0lstq9sin092atroovbfi9c60@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #720673 |
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 14:09:19 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 12/24/18 1:32 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 12/24/18 10:41 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>>>>>>> science. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>>>>>> the real world. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Interesting. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >>>>>>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >>>>>>> is beyond you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amazing to watch. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel >>>>> better about yourself. Wow. >>>> >>>> Non sequitur troll. >>>> >>> >>> Is that what you call yourself? I suppose it fits... but I can think of >>> better. :) >> >> An I know you are but what am I response? >> >> A puerile troll. >> >>> Seriously, though, instead of focusing on you I prefer to stick to the >>> topic. >> >> What topic is that? >> > >You admit [..] Your reading comprehension isn't very good, is it? Do you think that there's anyone who DOESN'T know you're a puerile troll who comes here only to be humiliated? More on Snit's trolling http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html Over 100 people ridicule Snit http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html Typical Snit trolling methods http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 21:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ju08ff-ll2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #720673 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 12/24/18 1:32 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 12/24/18 10:41 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>>>>>>> science. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>>>>>> the real world. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Interesting. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >>>>>>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >>>>>>> is beyond you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amazing to watch. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel >>>>> better about yourself. Wow. >>>> >>>> Non sequitur troll. >>>> >>> >>> Is that what you call yourself? I suppose it fits... but I can think of >>> better. :) >> >> An I know you are but what am I response? >> >> A puerile troll. >> >>> Seriously, though, instead of focusing on you I prefer to stick to the >>> topic. >> >> What topic is that? >> > > You admit you have been trolling so much you do not even know what topic > you are working to disrupt, and then seem shocked when your term "Non > sequitur troll" was assumed to be your name for yourself. Nonsense from either a childish or disturbed mind, or it could just be yet another troll that thinks it is much more clever than it actually is. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 14:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <qul22e1tkoov8slmap1fgcahe0gm6kl9ar@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #720686 |
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:50:43 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> You admit you have been trolling so much you do not even know what topic >> you are working to disrupt, and then seem shocked when your term "Non >> sequitur troll" was assumed to be your name for yourself. > >Nonsense from either a childish or disturbed mind, or it could just be >yet another troll that thinks it is much more clever than it actually is. > Looks like he has you pegged, Snitty. Have you told him about your bear yet? :I am Michael. I suffer with dysautonomia which leads to frustrating physical symptoms, :anxiety, agoraphobia and enjoy a healthy and fun level of pareidolia, and while these :affect my life on a day by day and often even a minute by minute basis they do not :define me. :And, like Sada who posted before me, I too get comfort from a bear. He is :often seen with me and people can accept him or not. : https://thefaceofmentalillness.wordpress.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 16:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8d7aiFe9p7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #720686 |
On 12/24/18 2:50 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 12/24/18 1:32 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/24/18 10:41 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>>>>>>>> science. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>>>>>>> the real world. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Interesting. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >>>>>>>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >>>>>>>> is beyond you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Amazing to watch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel >>>>>> better about yourself. Wow. >>>>> >>>>> Non sequitur troll. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is that what you call yourself? I suppose it fits... but I can think of >>>> better. :) >>> >>> An I know you are but what am I response? >>> >>> A puerile troll. >>> >>>> Seriously, though, instead of focusing on you I prefer to stick to the >>>> topic. >>> >>> What topic is that? >>> >> >> You admit you have been trolling so much you do not even know what topic >> you are working to disrupt, and then seem shocked when your term "Non >> sequitur troll" was assumed to be your name for yourself. > > Nonsense from either a childish or disturbed mind, or it could just be > yet another troll that thinks it is much more clever than it actually is. > > How is Egypt this time of year? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 23:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tk68ff-573.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #720693 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 12/24/18 2:50 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 12/24/18 1:32 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/24/18 10:41 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>>>>>>>>> science. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>>>>>>>> the real world. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Interesting. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >>>>>>>>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >>>>>>>>> is beyond you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Amazing to watch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel >>>>>>> better about yourself. Wow. >>>>>> >>>>>> Non sequitur troll. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is that what you call yourself? I suppose it fits... but I can think of >>>>> better. :) >>>> >>>> An I know you are but what am I response? >>>> >>>> A puerile troll. >>>> >>>>> Seriously, though, instead of focusing on you I prefer to stick to the >>>>> topic. >>>> >>>> What topic is that? >>>> >>> >>> You admit you have been trolling so much you do not even know what topic >>> you are working to disrupt, and then seem shocked when your term "Non >>> sequitur troll" was assumed to be your name for yourself. >> >> Nonsense from either a childish or disturbed mind, or it could just be >> yet another troll that thinks it is much more clever than it actually is. >> >> > How is Egypt this time of year? QED. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 16:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8d941FelfsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #720704 |
On 12/24/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 12/24/18 2:50 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/24/18 1:32 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/24/18 10:41 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 4:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/18 12:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you talk to someone who doesn't believe in climate change? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone that isn't an obsessive dip shit want to? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because the science deniers are running the country. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur, presupposes a fact not in evidence and demonstrates major bias. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You do not see how denying climate science is related to denying climate >>>>>>>>>>>> science. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't see how your babbling, trolling posts relate to anything in >>>>>>>>>>> the real world. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, you are not, just another babbling troll. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> See: more lashing out in a clearly failed effort to feel better about >>>>>>>>>> yourself... and why: because the topic of man-made global climate change >>>>>>>>>> is beyond you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Amazing to watch. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yet another babbling troll; QED. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More effort on your part to leave the topic behind as you fail to feel >>>>>>>> better about yourself. Wow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Non sequitur troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is that what you call yourself? I suppose it fits... but I can think of >>>>>> better. :) >>>>> >>>>> An I know you are but what am I response? >>>>> >>>>> A puerile troll. >>>>> >>>>>> Seriously, though, instead of focusing on you I prefer to stick to the >>>>>> topic. >>>>> >>>>> What topic is that? >>>>> >>>> >>>> You admit you have been trolling so much you do not even know what topic >>>> you are working to disrupt, and then seem shocked when your term "Non >>>> sequitur troll" was assumed to be your name for yourself. >>> >>> Nonsense from either a childish or disturbed mind, or it could just be >>> yet another troll that thinks it is much more clever than it actually is. >>> >>> >> How is Egypt this time of year? > > QED. > Another point that went over your head. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web