Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #719379 > unrolled thread

Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-12-19 06:41 -0500
Last post2018-12-19 19:53 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 74 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-19 06:41 -0500
    Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-19 07:22 -0700
      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-19 14:25 +0000
        Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-19 07:28 -0700
          Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-19 14:53 +0000
            Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-19 09:34 -0700
              Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 10:18 -0700
                Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-19 15:25 -0700
              Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-19 17:59 +0000
                Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-19 13:03 -0500
                  Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 11:09 -0700
                    Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-19 18:11 +0000
                  Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-19 10:32 -0800
                    Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-19 15:33 -0500
                      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 13:35 -0700
                      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-19 13:37 -0700
                        Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-19 16:06 -0500
                          Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 14:16 -0700
                            Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-19 23:47 -0800
                              Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 06:20 -0700
                          Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-19 13:43 -0800
                          Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 00:12 +0000
                            Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-19 21:01 -0600
                      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-19 15:50 -0500
                      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-19 13:31 -0800
                        Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-19 16:50 -0500
                          Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-19 22:24 +0000
                          Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-19 18:50 -0800
                            Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-19 23:23 -0500
                      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-20 07:24 -0500
                        Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-20 12:45 -0800
                    Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-19 15:26 -0700
                  Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-19 15:26 -0700
                    Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-19 22:29 +0000
                      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 15:37 -0700
                        Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-20 11:46 +0000
                      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-19 15:45 -0700
                Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-19 15:25 -0700
      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-19 12:20 -0600
    Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-19 11:49 -0700
      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-19 13:39 -0600
        Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-19 12:46 -0700
      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 12:43 -0700
        Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-19 23:53 -0800
    Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-19 19:07 +0000
      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-19 13:40 -0600
        Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 01:44 +0000
          Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 18:56 -0700
            Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-19 19:09 -0700
              Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 19:12 -0700
                Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-19 19:28 -0700
          Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-19 23:55 -0600
            Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-20 01:39 -0500
      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 12:44 -0700
        Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-12-19 20:15 +0000
          Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 13:22 -0700
            Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-12-19 22:03 +0000
              Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 15:36 -0700
          Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-19 22:33 -0500
            Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 06:14 -0700
              Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 13:32 +0000
              Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-20 18:59 -0500
                Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 19:33 -0700
                  Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 19:40 -0700
                    Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 20:51 -0700
                      Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 03:40 -0700
        Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 01:44 +0000
          Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 18:57 -0700
            Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-19 19:09 -0700
              Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 19:11 -0700
                Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-19 19:29 -0700
                  Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 06:14 -0700
                    Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 13:32 +0000
    Re: Climate change: Five things we've learnt from COP24 Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-19 19:53 -0800

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#719446

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-12-19 13:39 -0600
Message-ID<pve6p1$ao8$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#719440
On 12/19/2018 12:49 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
> On 12/19/2018 4:41 AM, kensi wrote:
>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris
>> climate agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change
>> for decades to come:
>>
>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
> 
> Meanwhile, the USA (who withdrew from the Paris accord)
> is leading the world in reducing carbon dioxide emissions,
> while China (which the bbc article praises for " showing
> leadership") is actually increasing its CO2 emissions.


   What about Water Vapor, the worlds biggest greenhouse gas ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719450

FromJust Wondering <JW@me.com>
Date2018-12-19 12:46 -0700
Message-ID<7exSD.233994$GZ9.194376@fx45.iad>
In reply to#719446
On 12/19/2018 12:39 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 12/19/2018 12:49 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>> On 12/19/2018 4:41 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris
>>> climate agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change
>>> for decades to come:
>>>
>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>
>> Meanwhile, the USA (who withdrew from the Paris accord)
>> is leading the world in reducing carbon dioxide emissions,
>> while China (which the bbc article praises for " showing
>> leadership") is actually increasing its CO2 emissions.
> 
> What about Water Vapor, the worlds biggest greenhouse gas?

You can thank (or blame) solar energy and the oceans for that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719448

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-19 12:43 -0700
Message-ID<brasik.fp8.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#719440
On 2018-12-19 11:49 a.m., Just Wondering wrote:
> On 12/19/2018 4:41 AM, kensi wrote:
>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris 
>> climate agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change 
>> for decades to come:
>>
>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
> 
> Meanwhile, the USA (who withdrew from the Paris accord)
> is leading the world in reducing carbon dioxide emissions,
> while China (which the bbc article praises for " showing
> leadership") is actually increasing its CO2 emissions.

the us is also leading the world in obesity

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719617

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2018-12-19 23:53 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.3684ea6e39444404995be1@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#719448
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <brasik.fp8.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com 
says...


@@@@@@
@@@@@@On 2018-12-19 11:49 a.m., Just Wondering wrote:
@@@@@@> On 12/19/2018 4:41 AM, kensi wrote:
@@@@@@>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris 
@@@@@@>> climate agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change 
@@@@@@>> for decades to come:
@@@@@@>>
@@@@@@>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
@@@@@@> 
@@@@@@> Meanwhile, the USA (who withdrew from the Paris accord)
@@@@@@> is leading the world in reducing carbon dioxide emissions,
@@@@@@> while China (which the bbc article praises for " showing
@@@@@@> leadership") is actually increasing its CO2 emissions.
@@@@@@
@@@@@@the us is also leading the world in obesity

Mostly the wimmen.

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719443

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-12-19 19:07 +0000
Message-ID<g7vj6nFfhdqU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#719379
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris climate 
> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for 
> decades to come:
> 
> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
> 

Most countries acknowledge the science. 

The current US position is to deny it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719447

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-12-19 13:40 -0600
Message-ID<pve6rl$ao8$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#719443
On 12/19/2018 1:07 PM, Snit wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris climate 
>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for 
>> decades to come:
>>
>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>
> 
> Most countries acknowledge the science. 
> 
> The current US position is to deny it. 
> 


Paris Accord had USA paying billions of dollars to third world
countries. Bad deal.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719547

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-12-20 01:44 +0000
Message-ID<g80afkFkcf4U4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#719447
Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 12/19/2018 1:07 PM, Snit wrote:
>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris climate 
>>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for 
>>> decades to come:
>>> 
>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>> 
>> 
>> Most countries acknowledge the science. 
>> 
>> The current US position is to deny it. 
>> 
> 
> 
> Paris Accord had USA paying billions of dollars to third world
> countries. Bad deal.
> 

Cite.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719551

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-19 18:56 -0700
Message-ID<brbiec.vjm.17.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#719547
On 2018-12-19 6:44 p.m., Snit wrote:
> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>> On 12/19/2018 1:07 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris climate
>>>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
>>>> decades to come:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>>>
>>>
>>> Most countries acknowledge the science.
>>>
>>> The current US position is to deny it.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Paris Accord had USA paying billions of dollars to third world
>> countries. Bad deal.
>>
> 
> Cite.
> 

The article cites several experts on the subject. The museum had often 
been cited as an example of successful fund-raising. He cited evidence 
suggesting she was in the area when the crime was committed. She was 
cited for reckless driving.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719555

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-12-19 19:09 -0700
Message-ID<g80bvkFkl15U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#719551
On 12/19/18 6:56 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-12-19 6:44 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>> On 12/19/2018 1:07 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris 
>>>>> climate
>>>>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
>>>>> decades to come:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Most countries acknowledge the science.
>>>>
>>>> The current US position is to deny it.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Paris Accord had USA paying billions of dollars to third world
>>> countries. Bad deal.
>>>
>>
>> Cite.
>>
> 
> The article cites several experts on the subject. The museum had often 
> been cited as an example of successful fund-raising. He cited evidence 
> suggesting she was in the area when the crime was committed. She was 
> cited for reckless driving.

I like cheese, but not cheese puffs. Explain that!

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719558

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-19 19:12 -0700
Message-ID<brbjbs.6tu.17.5@news.alt.net>
In reply to#719555
On 2018-12-19 7:09 p.m., Snit wrote:
> On 12/19/18 6:56 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-12-19 6:44 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12/19/2018 1:07 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris 
>>>>>> climate
>>>>>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
>>>>>> decades to come:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Most countries acknowledge the science.
>>>>>
>>>>> The current US position is to deny it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paris Accord had USA paying billions of dollars to third world
>>>> countries. Bad deal.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Cite.
>>>
>>
>> The article cites several experts on the subject. The museum had often 
>> been cited as an example of successful fund-raising. He cited evidence 
>> suggesting she was in the area when the crime was committed. She was 
>> cited for reckless driving.
> 
> I like cheese, but not cheese puffs. Explain that!
> 
you wern't properly weaned and cheese puffs have no cheese

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719559

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-12-19 19:28 -0700
Message-ID<g80d3bFksvnU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#719558
On 12/19/18 7:12 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-12-19 7:09 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 12/19/18 6:56 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2018-12-19 6:44 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 12/19/2018 1:07 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris 
>>>>>>> climate
>>>>>>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
>>>>>>> decades to come:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most countries acknowledge the science.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The current US position is to deny it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Paris Accord had USA paying billions of dollars to third world
>>>>> countries. Bad deal.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cite.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The article cites several experts on the subject. The museum had 
>>> often been cited as an example of successful fund-raising. He cited 
>>> evidence suggesting she was in the area when the crime was committed. 
>>> She was cited for reckless driving.
>>
>> I like cheese, but not cheese puffs. Explain that!
>>
> you wern't properly weaned and cheese puffs have no cheese

Makes sense.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719599

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-12-19 23:55 -0600
Message-ID<pvfat1$1oif$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#719547
On 12/19/2018 7:44 PM, Snit wrote:
> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>> On 12/19/2018 1:07 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris climate 
>>>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for 
>>>> decades to come:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>>>
>>>
>>> Most countries acknowledge the science. 
>>>
>>> The current US position is to deny it. 
>>>
>>
>>
>> Paris Accord had USA paying billions of dollars to third world
>> countries. Bad deal.
>>
> 
> Cite.
> 

Smite.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719608

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-12-20 01:39 -0500
Message-ID<pvfdgc$93a$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#719599

> On 12/19/2018 7:44 PM, Snit wrote:
>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>> On 12/19/2018 1:07 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris 
>>>>> climate
>>>>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
>>>>> decades to come:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Most countries acknowledge the science.
>>>>
>>>> The current US position is to deny it.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Paris Accord had USA paying billions of dollars to third world
>>> countries. Bad deal.
>>>
>>
>> Cite.

Art 9
1. Developed country Parties shall provide financial resources to assist
developing country Parties with respect to both mitigation and adaptation in
continuation of their existing obligations under the Convention.

9. The institutions serving this Agreement, including the operating entities 
of
the Financial Mechanism of the Convention, shall aim to ensure efficient 
access to
financial resources through simplified approval procedures and enhanced 
readiness
support for developing country Parties, in particular for the least 
developed
countries and small island developing States, in the context of their 
national
climate strategies and plans.

Art 10
6. Support, including financial support, shall be provided to developing 
country
Parties for the implementation of this Article, including for strengthening
cooperative action on technology development and transfer at different 
stages of
the technology cycle, with a view to achieving a balance between support for
mitigation and adaptation. The global stocktake referred to in Article 14 
shall take
into account available information on efforts related to support on 
technology
development and transfer for developing country Parties.

Once again we see that Snit promoting something he is ignorant about.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719449

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-19 12:44 -0700
Message-ID<brasjo.fp8.17.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#719443
On 2018-12-19 12:07 p.m., Snit wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris climate
>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
>> decades to come:
>>
>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>
> 
> Most countries acknowledge the science.
> 
> The current US position is to deny it.
> 
i support climate global

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719458

Fromonion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on)
Date2018-12-19 20:15 +0000
Message-ID<1o02o7d.w1z8ag1t6olyN%onion@anon.invalid>
In reply to#719449
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2018-12-19 12:07 p.m., Snit wrote:
> > kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris climate
> >> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
> >> decades to come:
> >>
> >> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
> >>
> > 
> > Most countries acknowledge the science.
> > 
> > The current US position is to deny it.
> > 
> i support climate global

Climate change should be allowed some latitude. 

-- 
  \|/ 
(((Ï)))     U+97F1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719461

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-19 13:22 -0700
Message-ID<brauqr.1f8.17.9@news.alt.net>
In reply to#719458
On 2018-12-19 1:15 p.m., Mr On!on wrote:
> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-12-19 12:07 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris climate
>>>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
>>>> decades to come:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>>>
>>>
>>> Most countries acknowledge the science.
>>>
>>> The current US position is to deny it.
>>>
>> i support climate global
> 
> Climate change should be allowed some latitude.
> 
we could post some kind of pole to see what people think

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719503

Fromonion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on)
Date2018-12-19 22:03 +0000
Message-ID<1o02t86.1brpauqllle2mN%onion@anon.invalid>
In reply to#719461
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2018-12-19 1:15 p.m., Mr On!on wrote:
> > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 2018-12-19 12:07 p.m., Snit wrote:
> >>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >>>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris climate
> >>>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
> >>>> decades to come:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Most countries acknowledge the science.
> >>>
> >>> The current US position is to deny it.
> >>>
> >> i support climate global
> > 
> > Climate change should be allowed some latitude.
> > 
> we could post some kind of pole to see what people think

The East Pole could be good.

-- 
  \|/ 
(((Ï)))     U+97F1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719520

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-19 15:36 -0700
Message-ID<brb6n0.7u8.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#719503
On 2018-12-19 3:03 p.m., Mr On!on wrote:
> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-12-19 1:15 p.m., Mr On!on wrote:
>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2018-12-19 12:07 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris climate
>>>>>> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
>>>>>> decades to come:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Most countries acknowledge the science.
>>>>>
>>>>> The current US position is to deny it.
>>>>>
>>>> i support climate global
>>>
>>> Climate change should be allowed some latitude.
>>>
>> we could post some kind of pole to see what people think
> 
> The East Pole could be good.
> 

i stubbed my toe on it

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719579

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-12-19 22:33 -0500
Message-ID<pvf46j$3ed$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#719458

"Mr On!on" <onion@anon.invalid> wrote in message 
news:1o02o7d.w1z8ag1t6olyN%onion@anon.invalid...
> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-12-19 12:07 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> > kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> >> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris 
>> >> climate
>> >> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
>> >> decades to come:
>> >>
>> >> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>> >>
>> >
>> > Most countries acknowledge the science.
>> >
>> > The current US position is to deny it.
>> >
>> i support climate global
>
> Climate change should be allowed some latitude.

Climate change is just a matter of time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719635

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-20 06:14 -0700
Message-ID<brcq5p.lf6.17.7@news.alt.net>
In reply to#719579
On 2018-12-19 8:33 p.m., Scout wrote:
> 
> 
> "Mr On!on" <onion@anon.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:1o02o7d.w1z8ag1t6olyN%onion@anon.invalid...
>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-12-19 12:07 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> > kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> >> However dull it may be, the operational rules for the 2015 Paris 
>>> >> climate
>>> >> agreement will govern the way the world tackles climate change for
>>> >> decades to come:
>>> >>
>>> >> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46582265
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Most countries acknowledge the science.
>>> >
>>> > The current US position is to deny it.
>>> >
>>> i support climate global
>>
>> Climate change should be allowed some latitude.
> 
> Climate change is just a matter of time.
> 
> 
time is just a matter of change

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web