Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #718965 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-17 05:21 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-21 12:30 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 109 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-17 05:21 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-17 08:34 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-17 09:43 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-17 09:45 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-17 13:55 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-17 19:00 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-17 15:22 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Scatboitoy g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-12-17 16:26 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <%> - 2018-12-17 14:33 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-17 21:58 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-17 15:57 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-17 17:32 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-17 18:46 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 04:38 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-18 07:47 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 13:28 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 05:45 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 08:28 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 13:54 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 05:58 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 14:16 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:33 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 06:50 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 09:29 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:18 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:20 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 11:53 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:34 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:55 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 15:13 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:57 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:15 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 16:16 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 17:13 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 17:12 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Greysat <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 08:19 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 08:47 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 08:12 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 16:47 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 17:17 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:20 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 12:56 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:22 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:32 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 12:54 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:24 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:56 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:12 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 16:16 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:16 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 17:18 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:21 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 12:29 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:21 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:26 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:29 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:54 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 09:20 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-18 10:25 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 10:30 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:24 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-18 11:26 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 12:58 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 14:30 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:55 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:32 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:33 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:55 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:24 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:25 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:33 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 12:15 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:21 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:27 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:28 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:51 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-19 12:27 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 14:18 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:18 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:50 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:22 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-19 12:25 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-18 20:25 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:16 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:37 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-18 21:42 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:52 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-19 20:07 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 13:13 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-19 13:45 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-19 15:38 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-20 07:37 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 06:13 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-20 08:22 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-20 12:48 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 13:57 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 09:18 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:37 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:52 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 16:58 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 23:37 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-21 12:30 +0000
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368319adb609374c605@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #719243 |
In article <br8e8p.cbh.19.28@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > >On 2018-12-18 2:21 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 12/18/18 12:15 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-12-18 10:33 a.m., Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could >>>>>>>>>>>> impact >>>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science >>>>>>>>>> screed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw >>>>>>>>> a tantrum >>>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- >>>>>>>> cannot >>>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>>>>>> argument. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is >>>>>> what >>>>>> you do. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> from "treehugger" STEM >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> What is driving the right wingers crazy: >>>> >>>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 >>>> ----- >>>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in >>>> Minnesota?s consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 >>>> decades, this organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure >>>> risk only in southern-tier states. >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is >>>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. >>>> >>> did you snit >> >> Not sure if you are using "snit" as a noun or a verb. Sentence does not >> seem to make sense either way. >> >neither does snit but did you I took a healthy snit this morning.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-19 12:27 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pve2iq$1i95$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719240 |
On 12/18/2018 3:21 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/18/18 12:15 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-18 10:33 a.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could >>>>>>>>>>> impact >>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science >>>>>>>>> screed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw >>>>>>>> a tantrum >>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- >>>>>>> cannot >>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>>>>> argument. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is >>>>> what >>>>> you do. >>>>> >>>> >>>> from "treehugger" STEM >>>> >>> >>> >>> What is driving the right wingers crazy: >>> >>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 >>> ----- >>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in >>> Minnesota’s consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 >>> decades, this organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure >>> risk only in southern-tier states. >>> ----- >>> >>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is >>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. >>> >> did you snit > > Not sure if you are using "snit" as a noun or a verb. Sentence does not > seem to make sense either way. > ? ? snit snot snat snet snut snyt snitty snotty snatty snetty snutty snytty nothing Motor Vehicles Dept recognizes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pvbkn5$5no$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719201 |
On 12/18/2018 11:33 AM, Snit wrote: > On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could >>>>>>>>> impact >>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>> >>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a >>>>>> tantrum >>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>> >>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>> >>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>> >>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>> >>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>> >>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>> >>>> >>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>>> argument. >>>> >>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>>> >>> >>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what >>> you do. >>> >> >> from "treehugger" STEM >> > > > What is driving the right wingers crazy: > > https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 > ----- > In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota’s > consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this > organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in > southern-tier states. > ----- > > There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is > impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. > nope, *NO EVIDENCE at all* read it again for the first time. look for the *weasel words*, their use indicates NO EVIDENCE could, assumed, may, might, possible, usally, if, might, sorta, should, shoulda, maybe, ...... etc. Snit, find a paper with evidence... and no weasel words.....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7t6hnFtufrU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #719216 |
On 12/18/18 1:18 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 12/18/2018 11:33 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could >>>>>>>>>> impact >>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a >>>>>>> tantrum >>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>>> >>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>>> >>>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>>>> argument. >>>>> >>>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>>>> >>>> >>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what >>>> you do. >>>> >>> >>> from "treehugger" STEM >>> >> >> >> What is driving the right wingers crazy: >> >> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 >> ----- >> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota’s >> consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this >> organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in >> southern-tier states. >> ----- >> >> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is >> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. >> > > nope, *NO EVIDENCE at all* > > read it again for the first time. > > look for the *weasel words*, their use indicates NO EVIDENCE > > could, assumed, may, might, possible, usally, if, might, sorta, should, > shoulda, maybe, ...... etc. > > > Snit, find a paper with evidence... and no weasel words..... > Do you have any evidence the evidence you deny is evidence is, actually, not evidence? It is evident you do not. Hmmm, when snowflakes such as yourself have a meltdown do you become water? LOL! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368319815c07026c604@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #719236 |
In article <g7t6hnFtufrU4@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 12/18/18 1:18 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 12/18/2018 11:33 AM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could >>>>>>>>>>> impact >>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a >>>>>>>> tantrum >>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>>>>> argument. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what >>>>> you do. >>>>> >>>> >>>> from "treehugger" STEM >>>> >>> >>> >>> What is driving the right wingers crazy: >>> >>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 >>> ----- >>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota?s >>> consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this >>> organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in >>> southern-tier states. >>> ----- >>> >>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is >>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. >>> >> >> nope, *NO EVIDENCE at all* >> >> read it again for the first time. >> >> look for the *weasel words*, their use indicates NO EVIDENCE >> >> could, assumed, may, might, possible, usally, if, might, sorta, should, >> shoulda, maybe, ...... etc. >> >> >> Snit, find a paper with evidence... and no weasel words..... >> > >Do you have any evidence the evidence you deny is evidence is, actually, >not evidence? It is evident you do not. > >Hmmm, when snowflakes such as yourself have a meltdown do you become >water? LOL! So no evidence and as usual you try to spin away.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 16:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7tdp6F1116U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #719260 |
On 12/18/18 2:50 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <g7t6hnFtufrU4@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> On 12/18/18 1:18 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 12/18/2018 11:33 AM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could >>>>>>>>>>>> impact >>>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a >>>>>>>>> tantrum >>>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>>>>>> argument. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what >>>>>> you do. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> from "treehugger" STEM >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> What is driving the right wingers crazy: >>>> >>>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 >>>> ----- >>>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota?s >>>> consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this >>>> organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in >>>> southern-tier states. >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is >>>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. >>>> >>> >>> nope, *NO EVIDENCE at all* >>> >>> read it again for the first time. >>> >>> look for the *weasel words*, their use indicates NO EVIDENCE >>> >>> could, assumed, may, might, possible, usally, if, might, sorta, should, >>> shoulda, maybe, ...... etc. >>> >>> >>> Snit, find a paper with evidence... and no weasel words..... >>> >> >> Do you have any evidence the evidence you deny is evidence is, actually, >> not evidence? It is evident you do not. >> >> Hmmm, when snowflakes such as yourself have a meltdown do you become >> water? LOL! > > So no evidence and as usual you try to spin away. > So you again deny the evidence is evidence but you have no evidence the evidence is not evidence. Can you now provide the evidence that the evidence is not evidence? I doubt it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-19 12:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pve2e4$1i95$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719236 |
On 12/18/2018 3:18 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/18/18 1:18 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 12/18/2018 11:33 AM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could >>>>>>>>>>> impact >>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science >>>>>>>>> screed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a >>>>>>>> tantrum >>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- >>>>>>> cannot >>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>>>>> argument. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is >>>>> what >>>>> you do. >>>>> >>>> >>>> from "treehugger" STEM >>>> >>> >>> >>> What is driving the right wingers crazy: >>> >>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 >>> ----- >>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota’s >>> consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this >>> organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in >>> southern-tier states. >>> ----- >>> >>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is >>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. >>> >> >> nope, *NO EVIDENCE at all* >> >> read it again for the first time. >> >> look for the *weasel words*, their use indicates NO EVIDENCE >> >> could, assumed, may, might, possible, usally, if, might, sorta, should, >> shoulda, maybe, ...... etc. >> >> >> Snit, find a paper with evidence... and no weasel words..... >> > > Do you have any evidence the evidence you deny is evidence is, actually, > not evidence? It is evident you do not. word salad => try putting them in order first. > > Hmmm, when snowflakes such as yourself have a meltdown do you become > water? LOL! > don't change the topic, Snitsnowflake (na...)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 20:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #719154 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 05:58:53 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>> >>>> Both, actually. >>>> >>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>> >>> >>Who said they were the same? >> >>Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a >>tantrum as he begs for attention. Same old same old. > > Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert > attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot > make any attempt to refute what was said. > > This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. > > More on Snit's trolling http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html > > Over 100 people ridicule Snit http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html > > Typical Snit trolling methods > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have: First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 which culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a single person rather than a server. Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn believe!" rant. Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of frogging me. 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight tweetstorms, mostly ranting about Robert Mueller. 17th place - Klaus, for the above. It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen better tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a robot. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 13:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <br8aqa.ke9.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #719218 |
On 2018-12-18 1:25 p.m., Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 05:58:53 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > >> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>> >>>>> Both, actually. >>>>> >>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>> >>>> >>> Who said they were the same? >>> >>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a >>> tantrum as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >> >> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >> make any attempt to refute what was said. >> >> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >> >> More on Snit's trolling http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >> >> Over 100 people ridicule Snit http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >> >> Typical Snit trolling methods >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html > > And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have: > > First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 which > culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a single > person rather than a server. > > Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn > believe!" rant. > > Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of > frogging me. > > 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight tweetstorms, > mostly ranting about Robert Mueller. > > 17th place - Klaus, for the above. > > It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen better > tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a robot. > > <snicker> > have you seen the stuff you're suspected to be
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7t6e9FtufrU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #719218 |
On 12/18/18 1:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 05:58:53 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > >> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>> >>>>> Both, actually. >>>>> >>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>> >>>> >>> Who said they were the same? >>> >>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a >>> tantrum as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >> >> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >> make any attempt to refute what was said. >> >> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >> >> More on Snit's trolling http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >> >> Over 100 people ridicule Snit http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >> >> Typical Snit trolling methods >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html > > And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have: > > First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 which > culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a single > person rather than a server. > > Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn > believe!" rant. > > Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of > frogging me. > > 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight tweetstorms, > mostly ranting about Robert Mueller. > > 17th place - Klaus, for the above. > > It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen better > tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a robot. > > <snicker> > Bigdog should be in their, too... for his utter meltdown when faced with his own lies. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3683167a7fe168de5f4@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #719218 |
In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >It's a wonder Klaus made me cry so close to my beloved Christmas. > You poor thing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 21:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pvbpjc$gh0$25@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #719250 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear. >> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have: >> >> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 which >> culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a single >> person rather than a server. >> >> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn >> believe!" rant. >> >> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of >> frogging me. >> >> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight tweetstorms, >> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller. >> >> 17th place - Klaus, for the above. >> >> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen better >> tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a robot. >> >> <snicker> > > You poor thing. Non sequitur. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368319eb941ff042606@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #719253 |
In article <pvbpjc$gh0$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > >> In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... > >I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear. > >>> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have: >>> >>> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 which >>> culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a single >>> person rather than a server. >>> >>> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn >>> believe!" rant. >>> >>> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of >>> frogging me. >>> >>> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight >tweetstorms, >>> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller. >>> >>> 17th place - Klaus, for the above. >>> >>> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen better >>> tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a robot. >>> >>> <snicker> >> >> You poor thing. > >Non sequitur. You snipped the part that hurt you. But libs are known for that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-19 20:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pve8dc$ml8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #719263 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:52:01 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pvbpjc$gh0$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >> >>I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear. >> >>>> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have: >>>> >>>> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 >>>> which culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a >>>> single person rather than a server. >>>> >>>> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn >>>> believe!" rant. >>>> >>>> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of >>>> frogging me. >>>> >>>> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight >>tweetstorms, >>>> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller. >>>> >>>> 17th place - Klaus, for the above. >>>> >>>> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen >>>> better tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a >>>> robot. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>> >>> You poor thing. >> >>Non sequitur. > > You snipped *You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to pull the "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-19 13:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brau9t.1f8.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #719453 |
On 2018-12-19 1:07 p.m., Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:52:01 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > >> In article <pvbpjc$gh0$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >>> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>> >>> I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear. >>> >>>>> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have: >>>>> >>>>> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 >>>>> which culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a >>>>> single person rather than a server. >>>>> >>>>> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn >>>>> believe!" rant. >>>>> >>>>> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of >>>>> frogging me. >>>>> >>>>> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight >>> tweetstorms, >>>>> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller. >>>>> >>>>> 17th place - Klaus, for the above. >>>>> >>>>> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen >>>>> better tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a >>>>> robot. >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>> You poor thing. >>> >>> Non sequitur. >> >> You snipped > > *You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to pull > the "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said. > but what if he does will you die
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-19 13:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36845bd8c0efb7e7995bb3@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #719453 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pve8dc$ml8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... booger boogerTime to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! boogerOn Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:52:01 -0700, Skeeter wrote: booger booger> In article <pvbpjc$gh0$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid booger> says... booger>> booger>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! booger>>On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote: booger>> booger>>> In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid booger>>> says... booger>> booger>>I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear. booger>> booger>>>> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have: booger>>>> booger>>>> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 booger>>>> which culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a booger>>>> single person rather than a server. booger>>>> booger>>>> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn booger>>>> believe!" rant. booger>>>> booger>>>> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of booger>>>> frogging me. booger>>>> booger>>>> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight booger>>tweetstorms, booger>>>> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller. booger>>>> booger>>>> 17th place - Klaus, for the above. booger>>>> booger>>>> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen booger>>>> better tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a booger>>>> robot. booger>>>> booger>>>> <snicker> booger>>> booger>>> You poor thing. booger>> booger>>Non sequitur. booger> booger> You snipped booger booger*You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to pull boogerthe "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said. It's amazing how two people who fancy themselves as rilly L337 torlls continue to spoon-feed hooks to each other day after day. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-19 15:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368476335b2e87c267a@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #719453 |
In article <pve8dc$ml8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:52:01 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > >> In article <pvbpjc$gh0$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >>> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>> >>>I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear. >>> >>>>> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have: >>>>> >>>>> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 >>>>> which culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a >>>>> single person rather than a server. >>>>> >>>>> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn >>>>> believe!" rant. >>>>> >>>>> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of >>>>> frogging me. >>>>> >>>>> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight >>>tweetstorms, >>>>> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller. >>>>> >>>>> 17th place - Klaus, for the above. >>>>> >>>>> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen >>>>> better tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a >>>>> robot. >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>> You poor thing. >>> >>>Non sequitur. >> >> You snipped > >*You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to pull >the "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said. Why must you lie? I snipped nothing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-20 07:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvg2e7$sjo$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719522 |
On 12/19/2018 5:38 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pve8dc$ml8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> *You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to pull >> the "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said. > > Why must you lie? I snipped nothing. Why must you lie? Audience, compare <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me> and <MPG.3683167a7fe168de5f4@news.eternal-september.org>. You'll find that nothing Nadegda wrote in the former is quoted in the latter, i.e. she is right and Skeeter snipped *massively* right before accusing her of snipping. Every irony meter in Manhattan has now filed suit against Skeeter for creating a hostile working environment. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-20 06:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brcq32.lf6.17.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #719630 |
On 2018-12-20 5:37 a.m., kensi wrote: > On 12/19/2018 5:38 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pve8dc$ml8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >>> *You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to >>> pull >>> the "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said. >> >> Why must you lie? I snipped nothing. > > Why must you lie? Audience, compare <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me> and > <MPG.3683167a7fe168de5f4@news.eternal-september.org>. You'll find that > nothing Nadegda wrote in the former is quoted in the latter, i.e. she is > right and Skeeter snipped *massively* right before accusing her of > snipping. > > Every irony meter in Manhattan has now filed suit against Skeeter for > creating a hostile working environment. > so what
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-20 08:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3685618ff7163c1869e@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #719630 |
In article <pvg2e7$sjo$6@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 12/19/2018 5:38 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pve8dc$ml8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >>> *You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to pull >>> the "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said. >> >> Why must you lie? I snipped nothing. > >Why must you lie? Audience, compare <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me> and ><MPG.3683167a7fe168de5f4@news.eternal-september.org>. You'll find that >nothing Nadegda wrote in the former is quoted in the latter, i.e. she is >right and Skeeter snipped *massively* right before accusing her of snipping. > >Every irony meter in Manhattan has now filed suit against Skeeter for >creating a hostile working environment. That's a lot of foam just to hide a lie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web