Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #716550 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-04 08:50 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-04 15:44 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 568 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 08:50 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 06:59 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-04 06:04 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 07:05 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-04 06:20 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 07:26 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-04 06:34 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 08:29 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-04 07:55 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-04 08:10 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-04 08:10 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 11:04 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 10:09 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 11:57 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 13:46 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-04 20:29 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 15:33 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-04 20:38 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-04 12:44 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country James Dellingpole <milohassexwithboys@fox.net> - 2018-12-05 04:18 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 14:33 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 14:49 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 15:03 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 15:07 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 15:22 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 15:34 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 15:46 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 15:48 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 15:51 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 15:53 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-04 22:57 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 16:01 -0700
WATCH OUT FOR SNIT % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 15:52 -0700
Re: WATCH OUT FOR SNIT Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 16:01 -0700
Re: WATCH OUT FOR SNIT % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 16:04 -0700
Re: WATCH OUT FOR SNIT Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-04 16:25 -0800
Re: WATCH OUT FOR SNIT % <%> - 2018-12-04 17:29 -0700
Re: WATCH OUT FOR SNIT Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-04 16:24 -0800
Re: WATCH OUT FOR SNIT % <%> - 2018-12-04 17:27 -0700
Re: WATCH OUT FOR SNIT Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-04 16:24 -0800
Re: WATCH OUT FOR SNIT % <%> - 2018-12-04 17:26 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 15:11 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 15:21 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 15:24 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 15:47 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 15:49 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 15:51 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 16:00 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 16:05 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 16:13 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-04 16:16 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 16:14 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 15:21 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 16:47 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 15:52 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 20:08 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 19:23 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-04 19:43 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-04 23:48 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 05:46 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-05 09:33 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 16:16 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-05 15:53 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 14:56 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 18:17 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-05 22:42 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 15:55 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-04 16:40 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 16:42 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-04 16:53 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-04 16:57 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-04 18:13 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-04 18:16 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 18:18 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-04 18:47 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-04 17:53 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 19:12 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-05 04:44 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 06:49 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-05 06:06 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-05 06:30 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 17:00 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-05 12:26 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 13:42 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-05 01:58 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 07:15 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-05 06:21 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-05 11:29 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 11:37 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-05 11:40 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 18:24 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 18:27 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-06 00:08 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-06 13:50 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-06 11:29 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-06 11:44 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-06 18:56 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-07 12:06 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-07 13:07 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-06 11:40 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-12-06 19:27 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-06 13:17 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-07 13:20 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-12-07 18:47 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-07 13:07 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-07 21:28 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-07 15:08 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-06 20:50 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-06 13:51 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-06 14:05 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-06 13:58 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-06 14:01 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-06 19:35 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-06 18:58 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-07 21:58 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-07 21:15 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-08 11:31 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-08 11:53 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-08 12:26 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-08 12:45 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-08 13:46 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-09 12:06 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-09 10:13 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-09 12:28 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-09 11:33 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-09 20:45 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-09 13:50 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-09 20:53 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-09 13:59 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-10 12:27 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-10 11:56 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-10 19:19 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-11 11:42 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-11 12:05 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-11 23:39 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-11 16:48 -0700
The final solution. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-18 07:31 -0800
Re: The final solution. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-18 20:33 +0000
Re: The final solution. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 13:53 -0700
Re: The final solution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:13 -0700
Re: The final solution. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:19 -0700
Re: The final solution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:29 -0700
Re: The final solution. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:47 -0700
Re: The final solution. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:42 -0700
Re: The final solution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:51 -0700
Re: The final solution. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:42 -0700
Re: The final solution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:52 -0700
Re: The final solution. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 15:15 -0700
Re: The final solution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:14 -0700
Re: The final solution. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 18:07 -0700
Re: The final solution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 18:54 -0700
Re: The final solution. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 19:03 -0700
Re: The final solution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 19:10 -0700
Re: The final solution. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 19:11 -0700
Re: The final solution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 19:19 -0700
Re: The final solution. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 18:12 -0800
Re: The final solution. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 21:13 -0700
Re: The final solution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-19 04:41 +0000
Re: The final solution. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:41 -0700
Re: The final solution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:53 -0700
Re: The final solution. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 15:16 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-11 21:46 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-11 22:18 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 02:59 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 13:48 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 06:53 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-12 05:58 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 07:12 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-12 06:18 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 07:30 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-12 07:05 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 08:27 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 10:48 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-12 12:15 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 12:10 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-12 16:27 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 17:30 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-12 22:32 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:44 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-13 06:14 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 14:25 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-13 06:43 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 07:51 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-13 07:01 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-13 10:07 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-13 22:53 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 16:30 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-13 10:01 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 16:15 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-13 12:03 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:59 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-14 04:41 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-14 07:13 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-14 06:26 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-14 07:34 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-14 06:42 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-14 07:49 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-14 06:56 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-12 22:30 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 07:15 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 11:41 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-12 12:47 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-12 14:36 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 12:40 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 12:43 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 14:01 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 14:04 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 15:59 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:14 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-12 22:38 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-12 22:38 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:44 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 14:27 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 14:30 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 15:23 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-12 17:28 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sir Gregory Hall , "Esq." - 2018-12-12 15:50 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-12 22:41 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-12 22:38 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-12 17:45 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall Esq." - 2018-12-12 16:09 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-12 22:44 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sir Gregory Hall , "Esq." - 2018-12-12 15:51 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-12 14:56 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:10 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 18:50 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-13 05:38 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-12 22:43 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-13 05:40 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-13 15:01 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-13 22:58 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-13 16:32 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-14 05:39 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-13 18:48 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:44 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 15:45 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:10 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 16:16 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit - 2018-12-12 16:31 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 18:54 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 19:02 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 15:49 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 18:56 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 18:58 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 23:09 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 06:18 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-13 01:16 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-13 04:07 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:45 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:45 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-13 15:05 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-12 17:23 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 15:35 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 15:41 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 19:07 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 19:22 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 15:44 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:11 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 16:15 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:23 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 15:58 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:13 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 19:14 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 19:21 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 15:58 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:13 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-12 22:40 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:44 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 13:56 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 13:58 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 14:01 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 14:04 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 15:59 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:13 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 14:23 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 14:27 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 14:32 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 15:57 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:12 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 16:14 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit - 2018-12-12 16:27 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit - 2018-12-12 16:33 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 19:10 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-13 05:47 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 19:09 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 19:21 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 23:10 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 06:18 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-13 01:19 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:45 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-13 15:09 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 15:27 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 15:44 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:12 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 16:14 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:23 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit - 2018-12-12 16:32 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 19:04 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 19:01 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 19:04 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-12 22:53 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:45 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-12 22:49 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:44 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-12 22:00 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-12 17:16 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 15:51 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:08 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-12 10:47 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-12 09:02 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-12 22:29 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-13 01:19 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-13 04:08 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:45 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-11 11:32 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-11 13:32 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-11 13:34 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 18:10 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-11 23:41 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-11 16:48 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-11 17:16 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-12 01:00 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-11 23:06 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 10:48 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-18 20:35 +0000
Nadegda's BlueEyed socialism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-18 14:15 -0800
Re: Nadegda's BlueEyed socialism. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 15:20 -0700
Re: Nadegda's BlueEyed socialism. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-19 20:12 +0000
Re: Nadegda's BlueEyed socialism. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 13:19 -0700
Re: Nadegda's BlueEyed socialism. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-19 22:50 -0500
Re: Nadegda's BlueEyed socialism. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-20 07:35 -0500
Re: Nadegda's BlueEyed socialism. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-20 08:29 -0700
Re: Nadegda's BlueEyed socialism. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-20 19:15 -0500
Re: Nadegda's BlueEyed socialism. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-21 08:57 -0500
Re: Nadegda's BlueEyed socialism. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 07:05 -0700
Re: Nadegda's BlueEyed socialism. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-21 12:25 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-09 13:52 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 10:29 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-10 12:38 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-10 10:45 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-10 11:57 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-09 12:21 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-09 12:31 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-09 12:38 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-09 11:32 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-09 13:56 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-09 12:15 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-09 15:03 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-09 13:06 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-09 13:05 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-09 20:47 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-09 13:56 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-10 12:47 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-10 10:53 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-10 11:58 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-10 20:19 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-10 13:23 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-10 14:45 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-11 11:43 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-11 11:32 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-10 19:24 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-10 19:12 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-10 21:28 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-11 23:42 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-11 16:49 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-08 15:21 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-08 23:40 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-08 17:03 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-08 17:13 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-10 19:33 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-11 23:43 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-11 16:50 -0700
In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-18 07:58 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-18 12:02 -0500
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:14 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 06:35 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 14:46 +0000
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 07:04 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-20 11:06 -0500
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 17:28 +0000
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 17:14 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 18:15 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 17:26 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 18:37 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 18:02 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 20:52 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-21 13:12 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 17:13 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 18:16 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 17:27 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 17:19 +0000
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 17:15 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 18:22 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 17:28 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 18:39 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 18:03 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 20:52 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-21 13:13 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-21 07:02 -0600
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. KlausSchadenfreude <klausschadenfreudeREMOVE@null.net> - 2018-12-21 13:22 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-21 08:36 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-21 07:39 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-21 10:54 -0500
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-21 08:15 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-21 17:13 +0000
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-21 17:13 +0000
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-21 12:22 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-21 12:35 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-21 17:13 +0000
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-21 12:23 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-20 11:05 -0500
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-20 10:47 -0600
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 17:28 +0000
Re: đ«đ«đ«â° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°đ«đ«đ« The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" đ«đ«đ«â° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°đ«đ«đ«â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-20 10:55 -0600
Joseph Smith. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-20 18:54 -0800
Re: Joseph Smith. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-21 08:34 -0500
Re: Joseph Smith. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-21 14:17 +0000
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 17:19 +0000
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 17:19 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 18:21 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 17:30 -0800
Re: đ«đ«đ«â° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°đ«đ«đ« The psychotic racist white-supremacist who sounds a lot like neal warren AKA greg hall taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post on usenet as "Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>" đ«đ«đ«â° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°đ«đ«đ«â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-20 19:44 -0600
A fat spliff and a bag of chips. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-20 19:15 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 18:38 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-20 18:04 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 20:53 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-21 13:14 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-21 14:17 +0000
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-21 14:25 -0800
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-21 17:06 +0000
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-21 12:20 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-21 12:39 -0700
Re: đ«đ«đ«â° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°đ«đ«đ« The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" đ«đ«đ«â° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°đ«đ«đ«â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-18 11:24 -0600
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 07:24 -0700
Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 17:00 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-08 10:16 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-08 12:23 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-08 12:29 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-08 10:36 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-08 12:50 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-08 10:54 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-08 13:46 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-08 14:03 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-08 10:53 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-08 13:47 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-08 14:03 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-10 19:08 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-10 19:55 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-06 12:59 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-06 13:16 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-06 18:46 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 13:13 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 13:43 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 13:47 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-05 15:48 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-05 13:51 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 13:53 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-12-05 13:54 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 14:02 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-05 15:35 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 17:15 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 14:01 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-05 14:59 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-05 13:09 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-04 16:58 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-04 16:36 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 16:43 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-04 16:54 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 20:13 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 19:21 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-05 02:03 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 05:48 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 07:03 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-05 09:58 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 17:00 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 10:21 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 10:36 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 13:12 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-05 09:50 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 16:16 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 10:21 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-05 20:29 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 13:38 -0700
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-05 14:42 -0600
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â % <%> - 2018-12-05 13:51 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 13:54 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-06 01:18 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-05 22:33 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 17:14 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-06 01:20 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 13:41 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 13:44 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 13:52 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 13:55 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-05 22:30 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-05 22:14 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-06 04:31 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 21:38 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-06 05:10 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-06 00:14 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-06 01:16 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 21:36 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-05 16:02 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-04 16:52 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 20:01 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-05 10:02 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 17:00 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 10:21 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-05 10:34 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 13:11 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 09:18 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 11:35 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 09:39 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 09:43 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-06 11:54 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-06 13:11 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%> - 2018-12-06 13:14 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-07 13:37 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-07 11:56 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-07 14:02 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-07 13:34 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-07 22:09 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-07 21:14 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-07 23:20 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-07 21:32 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-08 02:01 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-08 10:05 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-07 23:51 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-08 05:33 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-08 10:09 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-09 21:02 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-09 16:18 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-10 19:16 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 12:59 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-12-18 17:35 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-06 18:57 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-06 19:01 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-07 14:07 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-07 14:15 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-07 22:52 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-07 13:32 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-07 22:56 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-06 11:59 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-04 12:51 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 12:16 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-04 20:30 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-04 08:09 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 11:36 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-04 10:34 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 10:48 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-12-04 17:53 +0000
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 11:09 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 13:47 -0600
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-05 08:36 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-04 13:10 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 11:11 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-04 13:21 -0800
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 14:29 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 13:14 -0500
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 11:16 -0700
Re: Here's how climate change will impact your part of the country Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-04 15:44 -0800
Page 13 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 29 Next page →
| From | % <%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 16:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bqoq38.skq.19.8@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #717988 |
On 2018-12-12 3:45 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 12/12/18 3:23 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how you >>>>>>> seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one loaded >>>>>>> with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>> >>>>>> why not >>>>> >>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>> moral stance. >>>> >>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>> >>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >> >> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >> loses money doing it. > Agreed. It also makes no economic sense to the corporation to pay people > what they are worth given their position of power. It is why they do not. > no it isn't
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 16:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7dj5tFh8nbU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718014 |
On 12/12/18 4:10 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-12 3:45 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 12/12/18 3:23 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how you >>>>>>>> seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one loaded >>>>>>>> with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> why not >>>>>> >>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>> moral stance. >>>>> >>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>> >>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>> >>> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >>> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >>> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >>> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >>> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >>> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >>> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >>> loses money doing it. >> Agreed. It also makes no economic sense to the corporation to pay >> people what they are worth given their position of power. It is why >> they do not. >> > no it isn't Garbles. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 16:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bqorah.skq.19.31@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #718027 |
On 2018-12-12 4:16 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 12/12/18 4:10 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-12 3:45 p.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 12/12/18 3:23 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how >>>>>>>>> you seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one >>>>>>>>> loaded with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> why not >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>>> moral stance. >>>>>> >>>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>>> >>>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>>>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>>> >>>> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >>>> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >>>> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >>>> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >>>> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >>>> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >>>> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >>>> loses money doing it. >>> Agreed. It also makes no economic sense to the corporation to pay >>> people what they are worth given their position of power. It is why >>> they do not. >>> >> no it isn't > > Garbles. > yes you do
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 18:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <LZiQD.485$%A2.387@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #717988 |
On 12/12/2018 3:45 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/12/18 3:23 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how you >>>>>>> seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one loaded >>>>>>> with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>> >>>>>> why not >>>>> >>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>> moral stance. >>>> >>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>> >>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >> >> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >> loses money doing it. > Agreed. It also makes no economic sense to the corporation > to pay people what they are worth given their position of power. I know you used English words to write that sentence but it makes no sense. It appears to me it that as a general proposition it DOES make sense to pay people what they are worth, period. Will you please explain what you really mean?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 19:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7dst5Fj7g6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718054 |
On 12/12/18 6:54 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 12/12/2018 3:45 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/12/18 3:23 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how you >>>>>>>> seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one loaded >>>>>>>> with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> why not >>>>>> >>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>> moral stance. >>>>> >>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>> >>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>> >>> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >>> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >>> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >>> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >>> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >>> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >>> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >>> loses money doing it. > >> Agreed. It also makes no economic sense to the corporation to pay >> people what they are worth given their position of power. > > I know you used English words to write that sentence but it > makes no sense. I accept you fail to understand it. The final "their" refers to the corporation, if that helps you. > It appears to me it that as a general proposition > it DOES make sense to pay people what they are worth, period. Not if you can avoid it... and given the power of the corporation over the employee they, of course, often can. > Will you please explain what you really mean? A corporation has every incentive, and the power, to NOT pay people the value of their work. This is based on the inherent unequal power in the deals generally made. A poor person often has to agree to a level of pay under duress... and such it makes no sense to blindly trust the employer to just be fair. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 15:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bqooqq.eg2.19.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #717972 |
On 2018-12-12 3:23 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: > On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>> >>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how you >>>>>> seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one loaded >>>>>> with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>> >>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>> >>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>> >>>>> why not >>>> >>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>> moral stance. >>> >>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >> >> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks > > It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how > much profit an employee generates. An employee has to > contribute enough to his employer's financial success to > pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead > the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at > least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic > sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer > loses money doing it. like welfare
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 18:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8%iQD.512$%A2.260@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #717991 |
On 12/12/2018 3:49 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-12 3:23 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how you >>>>>>> seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one loaded >>>>>>> with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>> >>>>>> why not >>>>> >>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>> moral stance. >>>> >>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>> >>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >> >> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >> loses money doing it. > > like welfare Government welfare has nothing to do with what wage an employee should receive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 18:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7dsmoFj4aoU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718055 |
On 12/12/18 6:56 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 12/12/2018 3:49 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-12 3:23 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how you >>>>>>>> seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one loaded >>>>>>>> with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> why not >>>>>> >>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>> moral stance. >>>>> >>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>> >>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>> >>> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >>> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >>> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >>> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >>> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >>> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >>> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >>> loses money doing it. >> >> like welfare > > Government welfare has nothing to do with what wage > an employee should receive. The very topic is the government jumping in to cover the costs of labor when the employer does not. You then deem these payments to have nothing to do with the wage. Amazing "logic" you use. LOL! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 23:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <wImQD.390$yA8.140@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #718057 |
On 12/12/2018 6:58 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/12/18 6:56 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 3:49 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-12-12 3:23 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how >>>>>>>>> you seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one >>>>>>>>> loaded with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> why not >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>>> moral stance. >>>>>> >>>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>>> >>>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>>>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>>> >>>> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >>>> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >>>> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >>>> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >>>> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >>>> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >>>> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >>>> loses money doing it. >>> >>> like welfare >> >> Government welfare has nothing to do with what wage >> an employee should receive. > > The very topic is the government jumping in to cover the costs of labor > when the employer does not. That's not what the government does. I see now I need to add an adjective, you wizened little socialist troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 06:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g7ebsqFm54qU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718105 |
Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: > On 12/12/2018 6:58 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/12/18 6:56 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 3:49 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-12-12 3:23 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how >>>>>>>>>> you seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one >>>>>>>>>> loaded with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> why not >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>>>> moral stance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>>>> >>>>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>>>>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>>>> >>>>> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >>>>> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >>>>> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >>>>> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >>>>> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >>>>> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >>>>> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >>>>> loses money doing it. >>>> >>>> like welfare >>> >>> Government welfare has nothing to do with what wage >>> an employee should receive. >> >> The very topic is the government jumping in to cover the costs of labor >> when the employer does not. > > That's not what the government does. I see now I need to > add an adjective, you wizened little socialist troll. > How do you figure the government is not helping to fund Walmart and McDonaldâs employees?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 01:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <JzoQD.988$Ct4.62@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #718111 |
On 12/12/2018 11:18 PM, Snit wrote: > Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 6:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/12/18 6:56 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 3:49 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-12-12 3:23 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how >>>>>>>>>>> you seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one >>>>>>>>>>> loaded with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> why not >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>>>>> moral stance. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>>>>>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>>>>> >>>>>> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >>>>>> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >>>>>> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >>>>>> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >>>>>> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >>>>>> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >>>>>> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >>>>>> loses money doing it. >>>>> >>>>> like welfare >>>> >>>> Government welfare has nothing to do with what wage >>>> an employee should receive. >>> >>> The very topic is the government jumping in to cover the costs of labor >>> when the employer does not. >> >> That's not what the government does. I see now I need to >> add an adjective, you wizened little socialist troll. > > How do you figure the government is not helping to > fund Walmart and McDonaldâs employees? Government entitlement programs are means-based without regard to who, if anyone, the one applying works for. But you already know this, you wizened little socialist troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 04:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <put99d$gjd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #718133 |
"Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message news:JzoQD.988$Ct4.62@fx09.iad... > On 12/12/2018 11:18 PM, Snit wrote: >> Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 6:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/12/18 6:56 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/2018 3:49 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-12-12 3:23 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how >>>>>>>>>>>> you seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one >>>>>>>>>>>> loaded with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> why not >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>>>>>> moral stance. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>>>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>>>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>>>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>>>>>>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >>>>>>> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >>>>>>> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >>>>>>> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >>>>>>> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >>>>>>> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >>>>>>> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >>>>>>> loses money doing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> like welfare >>>>> >>>>> Government welfare has nothing to do with what wage >>>>> an employee should receive. >>>> >>>> The very topic is the government jumping in to cover the costs of labor >>>> when the employer does not. >>> >>> That's not what the government does. I see now I need to >>> add an adjective, you wizened little socialist troll. >> >> How do you figure the government is not helping to >> fund Walmart and McDonaldâs employees? > > Government entitlement programs are means-based without > regard to who, if anyone, the one applying works for. > But you already know this, you wizened little socialist troll. Further aren't these entitlement programs the sort of socialistic activities that Snit supports? So if anyone is subsidizing labor costs.....wouldn't it be Snit and his socialist agenda?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 13:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g7f62uFrlkbU9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718141 |
Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: > > > "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message > news:JzoQD.988$Ct4.62@fx09.iad... >> On 12/12/2018 11:18 PM, Snit wrote: >>> Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 6:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/18 6:56 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/2018 3:49 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 3:23 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how >>>>>>>>>>>>> you seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one >>>>>>>>>>>>> loaded with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> why not >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>>>>>>> moral stance. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>>>>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>>>>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>>>>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>>>>>>>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >>>>>>>> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >>>>>>>> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >>>>>>>> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >>>>>>>> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >>>>>>>> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >>>>>>>> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >>>>>>>> loses money doing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> like welfare >>>>>> >>>>>> Government welfare has nothing to do with what wage >>>>>> an employee should receive. >>>>> >>>>> The very topic is the government jumping in to cover the costs of labor >>>>> when the employer does not. >>>> >>>> That's not what the government does. I see now I need to >>>> add an adjective, you wizened little socialist troll. >>> >>> How do you figure the government is not helping to >>> fund Walmart and McDonaldâs employees? >> >> Government entitlement programs are means-based without >> regard to who, if anyone, the one applying works for. >> But you already know this, you wizened little socialist troll. > > Further aren't these entitlement programs the sort of socialistic activities > that Snit supports? > > So if anyone is subsidizing labor costs.....wouldn't it be Snit and his > socialist agenda? > > > What do you mean by socialist?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 13:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g7f62sFrlkbU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718133 |
Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: > On 12/12/2018 11:18 PM, Snit wrote: >> Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 6:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/12/18 6:56 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/2018 3:49 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-12-12 3:23 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how >>>>>>>>>>>> you seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one >>>>>>>>>>>> loaded with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> why not >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>>>>>> moral stance. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>>>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>>>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>>>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>>>>>>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >>>>>>> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >>>>>>> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >>>>>>> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >>>>>>> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >>>>>>> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >>>>>>> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >>>>>>> loses money doing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> like welfare >>>>> >>>>> Government welfare has nothing to do with what wage >>>>> an employee should receive. >>>> >>>> The very topic is the government jumping in to cover the costs of labor >>>> when the employer does not. >>> >>> That's not what the government does. I see now I need to >>> add an adjective, you wizened little socialist troll. >> >> How do you figure the government is not helping to >> fund Walmart and McDonaldâs employees? > > Government entitlement programs are means-based without > regard to who, if anyone, the one applying works for. > But you already know this, you wizened little socialist troll. > Means based. When Walmart and McDonaldâs do not pay their labor cost the government does. That is YOU. Do you not see how when the government pays the labor costs YOU are helping?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 15:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <oIAQD.2$ec.0@fx26.iad> |
| In reply to | #718159 |
On 12/13/2018 6:45 AM, Snit wrote: > Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 11:18 PM, Snit wrote: >>> Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 6:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/18 6:56 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/2018 3:49 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 3:23 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:30 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how >>>>>>>>>>>>> you seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one >>>>>>>>>>>>> loaded with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> why not >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>>>>>>> moral stance. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>>>>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>>>>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>>>>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured, who >>>>>>>>> decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's a math question, an accounting problem to measure how >>>>>>>> much profit an employee generates. An employee has to >>>>>>>> contribute enough to his employer's financial success to >>>>>>>> pay his own wage, a proportionate share of the overhead >>>>>>>> the employer has to pay to keep the business going, and at >>>>>>>> least a little profit for the employer. It makes no economic >>>>>>>> sense to keep an employee on the payroll if the employer >>>>>>>> loses money doing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> like welfare >>>>>> >>>>>> Government welfare has nothing to do with what wage >>>>>> an employee should receive. >>>>> >>>>> The very topic is the government jumping in to cover the costs of labor >>>>> when the employer does not. >>>> >>>> That's not what the government does. I see now I need to >>>> add an adjective, you wizened little socialist troll. >>> >>> How do you figure the government is not helping to >>> fund Walmart and McDonaldâs employees? >> >> Government entitlement programs are means-based without >> regard to who, if anyone, the one applying works for. >> But you already know this, you wizened little socialist troll. >> > > Means based. When Walmart and McDonaldâs do not pay their labor cost the > government does. That is YOU. > > Do you not see how when the government pays the labor costs YOU are > helping? When I buy something from Walmart or McDonald's, part of the purchase price I pay is what pays their labor costs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 17:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pus1pq$h14$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #717957 |
On 12/12/2018 4:30 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>> >>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>> >>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how you >>>>> seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one loaded with >>>>> a clearly false assumption. >>>>> >>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>> >>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>> >>>> why not >>> >>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general moral >>> stance. >> >> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >> employee is only worth $5/hour. > > how is an employees rate of pay measured , > who decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks People who own golf carts are worth much more than people who don't own golf carts. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 15:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f3gQD.5$OL4.0@fx15.iad> |
| In reply to | #717973 |
On 12/12/2018 3:23 PM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/12/2018 4:30 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>> >>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how you >>>>>> seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one loaded >>>>>> with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>> >>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>> >>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>> >>>>> why not >>>> >>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>> moral stance. >>> >>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >> >> how is an employees rate of pay measured , >> who decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks > > People who own golf carts are worth much more than people who don't own > golf carts. So the government should give poor people golf carts. That will make them worth much more, problem solved.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 15:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7dh5eFgremU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #717980 |
On 12/12/18 3:35 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 12/12/2018 3:23 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 4:30 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how you >>>>>>> seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one loaded >>>>>>> with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>> >>>>>> why not >>>>> >>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>> moral stance. >>>> >>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>> >>> how is an employees rate of pay measured , >>> who decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >> >> People who own golf carts are worth much more than people who don't >> own golf carts. > > So the government should give poor people golf carts. > That will make them worth much more, problem solved. How so? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 19:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <k9jQD.6$OL4.3@fx15.iad> |
| In reply to | #717985 |
On 12/12/2018 3:41 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/12/18 3:35 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 3:23 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 4:30 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how you >>>>>>>> seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one loaded >>>>>>>> with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> why not >>>>>> >>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>> moral stance. >>>>> >>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>> >>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured , >>>> who decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>> >>> People who own golf carts are worth much more than people who don't >>> own golf carts. >> >> So the government should give poor people golf carts. >> That will make them worth much more, problem solved. > > How so? That's a natural conclusion from mixed nut's statement. People with A are worth more than people without A. Give A to people without A, they are now people with A. QED. Of course, since mixed nut's original statement was actually bullshit, the natural conclusion is more of the same.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 19:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7du3aFjdnhU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718062 |
On 12/12/18 7:07 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 12/12/2018 3:41 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/12/18 3:35 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 3:23 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 4:30 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-12-12 2:27 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/2018 2:01 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/18 12:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-12 12:40 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:41 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and >>>>>>>>>>> Walmart? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why should any employer pay someone more than he's worth? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have never suggested they should. Interesting, though, how >>>>>>>>> you seek to avoid the question by asking another one... one >>>>>>>>> loaded with a clearly false assumption. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So let us get back the question at hand: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should we subsidize the labor costs of McDonaldâs and Walmart? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> why not >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because it is indefensible on both a human rights and a general >>>>>>> moral stance. >>>>>> >>>>>> In other words, you don't want to say so but you DO want >>>>>> employers to pay some employees more than they are worth. >>>>>> You want employers to pay an employee $10/hour when that >>>>>> employee is only worth $5/hour. >>>>> >>>>> how is an employees rate of pay measured , >>>>> who decides if they or worth 5 bucks or 10 bucks >>>> >>>> People who own golf carts are worth much more than people who don't >>>> own golf carts. >>> >>> So the government should give poor people golf carts. >>> That will make them worth much more, problem solved. >> >> How so? > > That's a natural conclusion from mixed nut's statement. > People with A are worth more than people without A. How so? That is the question and you set this as a starting assumption. > Give A to people without A, they are now people with A. QED. > > Of course, since mixed nut's original statement was actually > bullshit, the natural conclusion is more of the same. Yes, his claim was BS. Agreed. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 29 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web