Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #717687 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-11 11:17 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-15 07:51 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 152 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
'We are last generation that can stop climate change' kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-11 11:17 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-11 11:25 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-11 10:29 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-11 09:32 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-11 14:49 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-11 14:10 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-11 18:58 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 10:28 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 08:55 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-12 11:17 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 09:31 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-12 11:59 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 12:02 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 21:33 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 20:45 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 23:27 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 06:18 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-13 12:44 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-13 12:47 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 21:35 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-13 16:19 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-13 15:49 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 21:35 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-13 16:55 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-12 11:11 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 09:33 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 12:29 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 11:56 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 23:18 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 06:18 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-13 12:45 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-13 12:51 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-13 12:00 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-13 17:03 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-14 00:26 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 21:35 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-13 17:06 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 16:29 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-13 21:26 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 20:43 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-13 23:00 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-11 23:48 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 18:01 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-11 09:31 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-11 14:51 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-11 14:13 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-11 19:09 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-11 21:52 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-11 20:59 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-11 23:26 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-11 23:59 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-12 02:26 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 10:34 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 10:29 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 08:55 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 12:31 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-12 12:43 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 11:54 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-11 23:58 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-12 11:00 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 09:07 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-12 11:27 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 12:29 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-12 15:08 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-12 14:12 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ % <%> - 2018-12-12 13:15 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sir Gregory Hall , Esq - 2018-12-12 13:13 -0700
Re: Fake Sir Greg! "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-12 20:19 +0000
Re: Fake Sir Greg! Sir Gregory Hall , Esq - 2018-12-12 13:34 -0700
Re: Fake Sir Greg! Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-12 17:05 -0800
Re: Fake Sir Greg! Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 19:57 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 13:59 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-12 14:06 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 15:59 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:05 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 16:17 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit - 2018-12-12 16:27 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-13 03:24 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:45 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 12:32 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 11:52 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 13:52 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-12 14:10 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-12 13:14 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-12 14:21 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-12 13:31 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-12 14:36 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sir Gregory Hall , Esq - 2018-12-12 13:39 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-12 17:12 -0800
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 16:02 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-12 22:34 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sir Gregory Hall , "Esq." - 2018-12-12 15:53 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 21:12 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 18:05 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 21:19 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-12 14:45 -0800
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 14:00 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-12 14:07 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-12 15:11 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-12 14:16 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-13 17:07 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 18:01 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 16:14 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-12 16:22 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-12 16:47 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit - 2018-12-12 17:02 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-13 03:26 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:45 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-13 03:25 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-13 00:54 -0800
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:45 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-14 19:54 -0800
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 13:45 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-13 17:09 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 16:23 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-11 11:31 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-11 11:36 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-11 18:57 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-11 12:05 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-11 12:08 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-11 17:09 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-11 17:53 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-11 14:26 -0800
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-11 12:37 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-11 22:33 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-11 23:59 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-11 17:10 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-11 17:52 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-12 09:35 -0800
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-12 22:26 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter Sir Gregory Hall , "Esq." - 2018-12-12 15:52 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-12 21:21 -0600
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter Nadegda - 2018-12-12 16:03 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-12 15:07 -0800
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-12 23:11 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter Sir Gregory Hall , "Esq." - 2018-12-12 16:21 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-13 15:35 -0800
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-14 05:36 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-14 11:10 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-15 05:20 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-14 19:49 -0800
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Carbon Tax non-starter "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-14 19:50 -0800
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-13 17:47 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 16:30 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-13 19:18 -0500
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-13 15:17 -0800
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-15 14:02 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-15 14:05 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-15 07:07 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 07:33 -0700
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-15 14:50 +0000
Re: 'We are last generation that can stop climate change' % <%> - 2018-12-15 07:51 -0700
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 16:19 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <puultv$1ihn$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #718215 |
On 12/13/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: > Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> On 12/13/2018 12:18 AM, Snit wrote: >>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 9:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/18 8:33 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/2018 1:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/18 9:59 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:31:11 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So you have no answer as to how America can become a leader in dealing >>>>>>>>> with man-made global climate change. >>>>>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your brainwashing is showing, you fool. There is no >>>>>>>> proof of man-made global warming. There are, at >>>>>>>> best, faulty computer models which are based on >>>>>>>> cooked books. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cite. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Keep in mind: I am going to stick with evidence and science and reason, >>>>>>> no matter how emotional you get in your plea to have me reject those >>>>>>> things as a part of your religion which worships the wealthy and seeks >>>>>>> to subsidize their costs. >>>>>> >>>>>> what you approve or reject is unimportant. >>>>> >>>>> I understand science and evidence and reason may not be important to you. >>>> >>>> you only guess. >>> >>> You just said it was — to you — unimportant. >> >> what you say is unimportant, you only guess, never provide URL >> >>> >>>> You never answer specific questions, nor ask them, no knowledge there.. >>>> It is ok, some people are like that. >>> >>> How vague of you. >> >> clearly, I am calling you a know nothing, and that is ok. Perhaps you >> already know that about yourself. >> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Snit - google 'foundation', a financial tool, every one of your >>>>>> democrats in Congress has one. you are being tooled by them. >>>>> >>>>> Go on... seems you are trying to make a point but want me to help you >>>>> with the research. >>>> >>>> I'll let you do it. Perhaps you could acquire a little knowledge, >>>> perhaps not. >>> >>> So you have no point. OK. >> >> since your lost the subject again, here it is; "Snit - google >> 'foundation', a financial tool, every one of your democrats in Congress >> has one. you are being tooled by them." >> >>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> There was a time when America was >>>>>>>>> seen as the leader in these things dealing with human rights... >>>>>>>>> but that is no longer the case. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There was a time when stupid and ignorant people >>>>>>>> like you didn't speak out because you at least had >>>>>>>> a little shame. That is no longer the case. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See how you lash out with emotion. It is quite telling. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> you a 'mind reader' or are you Snit-faced ? >>>>> >>>>> No, I am a text reader. And his text shows his emotion and his lashing out. >>>>> >>>> >>>> those are your feelings, not his. >>>> >>>> >>> Incorrect. >> >> why do you have emotional reactions to posts ? >> >> >> >> >> >> > > You have no support. Got it. > why do you use such harsh words ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 15:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <puugks$8mg$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #718085 |
On 12/12/2018 10:33 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 12/12/2018 1:02 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/12/18 9:59 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:31:11 -0700, Snit >>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> So you have no answer as to how America can become a leader in dealing >>>> with man-made global climate change. >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> >>> Your brainwashing is showing, you fool. There is no >>> proof of man-made global warming. There are, at >>> best, faulty computer models which are based on >>> cooked books. >> >> Cite. >> >> Keep in mind: I am going to stick with evidence and science and reason, >> no matter how emotional you get in your plea to have me reject those >> things as a part of your religion which worships the wealthy and seeks >> to subsidize their costs. > > what you approve or reject is unimportant. > > Snit - google 'foundation', a financial tool, every one of your > democrats in Congress has one. you are being tooled by them. > >> >>>> There was a time when America was >>>> seen as the leader in these things dealing with human rights... >>>> but that is no longer the case. >>> >>> There was a time when stupid and ignorant people >>> like you didn't speak out because you at least had >>> a little shame. That is no longer the case. >> >> See how you lash out with emotion. It is quite telling. >> >> > > you a 'mind reader' or are you Snit-faced ? > He's shit-faced. It's so funny when libs get told truth they assume it's slander and lies the way they operate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 21:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g7g1knF33hmU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718207 |
benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/12/2018 10:33 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 1:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/12/18 9:59 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:31:11 -0700, Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> So you have no answer as to how America can become a leader in dealing >>>>> with man-made global climate change. >>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>> >>>> Your brainwashing is showing, you fool. There is no >>>> proof of man-made global warming. There are, at >>>> best, faulty computer models which are based on >>>> cooked books. >>> >>> Cite. >>> >>> Keep in mind: I am going to stick with evidence and science and reason, >>> no matter how emotional you get in your plea to have me reject those >>> things as a part of your religion which worships the wealthy and seeks >>> to subsidize their costs. >> >> what you approve or reject is unimportant. >> >> Snit - google 'foundation', a financial tool, every one of your >> democrats in Congress has one. you are being tooled by them. >> >>> >>>>> There was a time when America was >>>>> seen as the leader in these things dealing with human rights... >>>>> but that is no longer the case. >>>> >>>> There was a time when stupid and ignorant people >>>> like you didn't speak out because you at least had >>>> a little shame. That is no longer the case. >>> >>> See how you lash out with emotion. It is quite telling. >>> >>> >> >> you a 'mind reader' or are you Snit-faced ? >> > He's shit-faced. It's so funny when libs get told truth they assume > it's slander and lies the way they operate. > > Irony. I get it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 16:55 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <puuo0i$1r9a$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #718217 |
On 12/13/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: > benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 10:33 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 1:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/12/18 9:59 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:31:11 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> So you have no answer as to how America can become a leader in dealing >>>>>> with man-made global climate change. >>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>>> >>>>> Your brainwashing is showing, you fool. There is no >>>>> proof of man-made global warming. There are, at >>>>> best, faulty computer models which are based on >>>>> cooked books. >>>> >>>> Cite. >>>> >>>> Keep in mind: I am going to stick with evidence and science and reason, >>>> no matter how emotional you get in your plea to have me reject those >>>> things as a part of your religion which worships the wealthy and seeks >>>> to subsidize their costs. >>> >>> what you approve or reject is unimportant. >>> >>> Snit - google 'foundation', a financial tool, every one of your >>> democrats in Congress has one. you are being tooled by them. >>> >>>> >>>>>> There was a time when America was >>>>>> seen as the leader in these things dealing with human rights... >>>>>> but that is no longer the case. >>>>> >>>>> There was a time when stupid and ignorant people >>>>> like you didn't speak out because you at least had >>>>> a little shame. That is no longer the case. >>>> >>>> See how you lash out with emotion. It is quite telling. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> you a 'mind reader' or are you Snit-faced ? >>> >> He's shit-faced. It's so funny when libs get told truth they assume >> it's slander and lies the way they operate. >> >> > > Irony. I get it. > Irony Meteorite ? You bought one ? you have to agree that you are Snit-faced.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 11:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0lc21e16o7jh85iee24nb6vbqhmsciflog@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #717865 |
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: <...> >> Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". >> >So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes >the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the major >polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any way they >see fit? Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab that it is. >Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear his mamma never disciplined him. It's clear he has never produced anything but hot air. -- Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall "Everybody here likes him" --PeeScent
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 09:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7crjjFc8aiU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #717872 |
On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: > > <...> > >>> Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". >>> >> So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes >> the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the major >> polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any way they >> see fit? > > Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab > that it is. Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create lies to deny the science. >> Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? > > Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear > his mamma never disciplined him. It's clear he > has never produced anything but hot air. What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! Bottom line: you are just lashing out to not have your religion be questioned. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 12:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <purk26$roh$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #717877 |
On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote:
>>
>> <...>
>>
>>>> Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement".
>>>>
>>> So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes
>>> the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the major
>>> polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any way they
>>> see fit?
>>
>> Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab
>> that it is.
>
> Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the
> harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added
> green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that.
Cite. And stop using electricity and gasoline.
>
> Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the
> redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is
> indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create
> lies to deny the science.
so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the very rich
(themselves)
as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT"
>
>>> Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit?
>>
>> Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear
>> his mamma never disciplined him. It's clear he
>> has never produced anything but hot air.
>
> What do you mean by Socialist? LOL!
>
> Bottom line: you are just lashing out to not have your religion be
> questioned.
>
"Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much money
you got ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 11:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7d3viFe0q6U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #717894 |
On 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: >>> >>> <...> >>> >>>>> Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". >>>>> >>>> So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes >>>> the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the major >>>> polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any way they >>>> see fit? >>> >>> Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab >>> that it is. >> >> Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the >> harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added >> green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. > > Cite. Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up again. > And stop using electricity and gasoline. That would not change how we subsidize those corporations. >> Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the >> redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is >> indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create >> lies to deny the science. > > so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the very rich > (themselves) > > as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" In France they tried to INCREASE those subsidies. They did not ask those corporations to fund themselves. >>>> Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? >>> >>> Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear >>> his mamma never disciplined him. It's clear he >>> has never produced anything but hot air. >> >> What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! >> >> Bottom line: you are just lashing out to not have your religion be >> questioned. >> > > "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much money > you got ? And you did not define what you mean by "Socialist", nor did you have any real response to your lashing out. You are very emotional... where I am speaking of the evidence and reason. We are not likely to see eye to eye. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 23:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pusq2q$1apb$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #717905 |
On 12/12/2018 12:56 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: >>>> >>>> <...> >>>> >>>>>> Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". >>>>>> >>>>> So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes >>>>> the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the >>>>> major >>>>> polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any way >>>>> they >>>>> see fit? >>>> >>>> Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab >>>> that it is. >>> >>> Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the >>> harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added >>> green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. >> >> Cite. > > Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up again. > >> And stop using electricity and gasoline. > > That would not change how we subsidize those corporations. > >>> Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the >>> redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is >>> indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create >>> lies to deny the science. >> >> so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the very rich >> (themselves) >> >> as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" > > In France they tried to INCREASE those subsidies. They did not ask those > corporations to fund themselves. > >>>>> Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? >>>> >>>> Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear >>>> his mamma never disciplined him. It's clear he >>>> has never produced anything but hot air. >>> >>> What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! >>> >>> Bottom line: you are just lashing out to not have your religion be >>> questioned. >>> >> >> "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much money >> you got ? > > And you did not define what you mean by "Socialist", nor did you have > any real response to your lashing out. You are very emotional... where I > am speaking of the evidence and reason. We are not likely to see eye to > eye. > > emotional ? why? , you only use the words "evidence and reason", but have no URLs, just a limited set of lefty buzz words
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 06:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g7ebsoFm54qU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718093 |
Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 12/12/2018 12:56 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <...> >>>>> >>>>>>> Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". >>>>>>> >>>>>> So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes >>>>>> the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the >>>>>> major >>>>>> polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any way >>>>>> they >>>>>> see fit? >>>>> >>>>> Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab >>>>> that it is. >>>> >>>> Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the >>>> harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added >>>> green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. >>> >>> Cite. >> >> Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up again. >> >>> And stop using electricity and gasoline. >> >> That would not change how we subsidize those corporations. >> >>>> Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the >>>> redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is >>>> indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create >>>> lies to deny the science. >>> >>> so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the very rich >>> (themselves) >>> >>> as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" >> >> In France they tried to INCREASE those subsidies. They did not ask those >> corporations to fund themselves. >> >>>>>> Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? >>>>> >>>>> Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear >>>>> his mamma never disciplined him. It's clear he >>>>> has never produced anything but hot air. >>>> >>>> What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! >>>> >>>> Bottom line: you are just lashing out to not have your religion be >>>> questioned. >>>> >>> >>> "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much money >>> you got ? >> >> And you did not define what you mean by "Socialist", nor did you have >> any real response to your lashing out. You are very emotional... where I >> am speaking of the evidence and reason. We are not likely to see eye to >> eye. >> >> > > emotional ? why? , you only use the words "evidence and reason", but > have no URLs, just a limited set of lefty buzz words > I have talked about the subsidies and asked what you meant by Socialism. Like Klaus, you run.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 12:45 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <puu9db$1bo4$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #718109 |
On 12/13/2018 12:18 AM, Snit wrote: > Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> On 12/12/2018 12:56 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <...> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes >>>>>>> the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the >>>>>>> major >>>>>>> polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any way >>>>>>> they >>>>>>> see fit? >>>>>> >>>>>> Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab >>>>>> that it is. >>>>> >>>>> Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the >>>>> harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added >>>>> green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. >>>> >>>> Cite. >>> >>> Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up again. >>> >>>> And stop using electricity and gasoline. >>> >>> That would not change how we subsidize those corporations. >>> >>>>> Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the >>>>> redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is >>>>> indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create >>>>> lies to deny the science. >>>> >>>> so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the very rich >>>> (themselves) >>>> >>>> as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" >>> >>> In France they tried to INCREASE those subsidies. They did not ask those >>> corporations to fund themselves. >>> >>>>>>> Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? >>>>>> >>>>>> Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear >>>>>> his mamma never disciplined him. It's clear he >>>>>> has never produced anything but hot air. >>>>> >>>>> What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! >>>>> >>>>> Bottom line: you are just lashing out to not have your religion be >>>>> questioned. >>>>> >>>> >>>> "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much money >>>> you got ? >>> >>> And you did not define what you mean by "Socialist", nor did you have >>> any real response to your lashing out. You are very emotional... where I >>> am speaking of the evidence and reason. We are not likely to see eye to >>> eye. >>> >>> >> >> emotional ? why? , you only use the words "evidence and reason", but >> have no URLs, just a limited set of lefty buzz words >> > > I have talked about the subsidies and asked what you meant by Socialism. > Like Klaus, you run. > what subsidies? got URL ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 12:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <X8Odnf4hAry4N4_BnZ2dnUU7-LXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #718185 |
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:45:54 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <puu9db$1bo4$2@gioia.aioe.org>: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/13/2018 12:18 AM, Snit wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/2018 12:56 PM, Snit wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ <...> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ major polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ way they see fit? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab that it is. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Cite. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up again. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ And stop using electricity and gasoline. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ That would not change how we subsidize those corporations. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ lies to deny the science. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the very rich ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ (themselves) as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ In France they tried to INCREASE those subsidies. They did not ask those ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ corporations to fund themselves. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear his mamma never ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ disciplined him. It's clear he has never produced anything but hot ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ air. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! Bottom line: you are just lashing ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ out to not have your religion be questioned. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much money ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ you got ? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ And you did not define what you mean by "Socialist", nor did you have ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ any real response to your lashing out. You are very emotional... where ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ I am speaking of the evidence and reason. We are not likely to see eye ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ to eye. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ emotional ? why? , you only use the words "evidence and reason", but ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ have no URLs, just a limited set of lefty buzz words ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ I have talked about the subsidies and asked what you meant by Socialism. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Like Klaus, you run. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ what subsidies? got URL ? well for starters, there are gas subsidies in place for everyone in the USA. corporations are taking advantage of those subsidies every time they ship a product closer to a customer. also, corporations will be paying more than 10% less taxes next year. you and i, however, will continue paying about 30% of our income to taxes. -- [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION] THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 12:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bqqvpe.i0v.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #718187 |
On 2018-12-13 11:51 a.m., Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:45:54 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Sergio > <invalid@invalid.com> determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <puu9db$1bo4$2@gioia.aioe.org>: > > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/13/2018 12:18 AM, Snit wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/2018 12:56 PM, Snit wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ <...> > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ major polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ way they see fit? > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab that it is. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Cite. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up again. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ And stop using electricity and gasoline. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ That would not change how we subsidize those corporations. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ lies to deny the science. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the very rich > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ (themselves) as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ In France they tried to INCREASE those subsidies. They did not ask those > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ corporations to fund themselves. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear his mamma never > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ disciplined him. It's clear he has never produced anything but hot > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ air. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! Bottom line: you are just lashing > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ out to not have your religion be questioned. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much money > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ you got ? > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ And you did not define what you mean by "Socialist", nor did you have > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ any real response to your lashing out. You are very emotional... where > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ I am speaking of the evidence and reason. We are not likely to see eye > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ to eye. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ emotional ? why? , you only use the words "evidence and reason", but > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ have no URLs, just a limited set of lefty buzz words > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ I have talked about the subsidies and asked what you meant by Socialism. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Like Klaus, you run. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ what subsidies? got URL ? > > well for starters, there are gas subsidies in place for everyone in the USA. > > corporations are taking advantage of those subsidies every time they ship a product closer to a customer. > > also, corporations will be paying more than 10% less taxes next year. > > you and i, however, will continue paying about 30% of our income to taxes. > marry a native and you can keep it , and if you claim her as a dependent woo hoo , it's like pulling the handle on the , $10,000 one armed bandit , then there's the northern living allowance , you get paid to live where you would live anyway , i usually show them i spent more than i earned
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 17:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <puuoh5$1t86$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #718187 |
On 12/13/2018 12:51 PM, Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:45:54 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Sergio > <invalid@invalid.com> determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <puu9db$1bo4$2@gioia.aioe.org>: > > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/13/2018 12:18 AM, Snit wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/2018 12:56 PM, Snit wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ <...> > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ major polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ way they see fit? > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab that it is. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Cite. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up again. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ And stop using electricity and gasoline. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ That would not change how we subsidize those corporations. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ lies to deny the science. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the very rich > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ (themselves) as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ In France they tried to INCREASE those subsidies. They did not ask those > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ corporations to fund themselves. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear his mamma never > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ disciplined him. It's clear he has never produced anything but hot > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ air. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! Bottom line: you are just lashing > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ out to not have your religion be questioned. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much money > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ you got ? > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ And you did not define what you mean by "Socialist", nor did you have > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ any real response to your lashing out. You are very emotional... where > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ I am speaking of the evidence and reason. We are not likely to see eye > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ to eye. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ emotional ? why? , you only use the words "evidence and reason", but > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ have no URLs, just a limited set of lefty buzz words > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ I have talked about the subsidies and asked what you meant by Socialism. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Like Klaus, you run. > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ > ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ what subsidies? got URL ? > > well for starters, there are gas subsidies in place for everyone in the USA. nope. got URL ? USA gas is heavily taxed by states, not a subsidy. In Kalifornia the tax is $0.69 per gallon. Fed Tax is $0.184 per gallon. so, where is this subsidie that you talk about ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_taxes_in_the_United_States > > corporations are taking advantage of those subsidies every time they ship a product closer to a customer. no, except for Amazon's deal with USPS. > > also, corporations will be paying more than 10% less taxes next year. now, less tax is not a subsidy, right ? > > you and i, however, will continue paying about 30% of our income to taxes. you make that much money !! You are a RICH PERSON. my taxes got cut big time, >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-14 00:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ocSdne6OOaGc0I7BnZ2dnUU7-KfNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #718236 |
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:03:56 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <puuoh5$1t86$1@gioia.aioe.org>: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/13/2018 12:51 PM, 💩's Owner 🐶笛 wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:45:54 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Sergio ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ <invalid@invalid.com> determined that the following was of great ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ <puu9db$1bo4$2@gioia.aioe.org>: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 12/13/2018 12:18 AM, Snit wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/2018 12:56 PM, Snit wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Hall, Esq. wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ <...> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ So ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ major polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ way ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ they see fit? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab that it is. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Of ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Cite. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up again. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ And stop using electricity and ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ gasoline. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ That would not change how we ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ subsidize those corporations. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Trump and Republicans in general back ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ the current money grab -- the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ redistribution of money to the very ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ rich. They know their stance is ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ indefensible -- a religious and not a ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ reasoned stance -- so they create ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ lies to deny the science. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ so you want Social Democrats to ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ redistribution of money to the very rich ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ (themselves) as the French ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ In France they tried to INCREASE ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ those subsidies. They did not ask those ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ corporations to fund themselves. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Or is the question just how big a ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ dishonest liar and crook is Snit? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear his mamma never ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ disciplined him. It's clear he has ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ never produced anything but hot ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ air. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Bottom line: you are just lashing ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ out to not have your religion be ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ questioned. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ money ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ you ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ got ? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ And you did not define what you mean ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ by "Socialist", nor did you have ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ any real response to your lashing ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ out. You are very emotional... where ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ I am speaking of the evidence and ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ reason. We are not likely to see eye ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ to eye. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ emotional ? why? , you only use the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ words "evidence and reason", but ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ have no URLs, just a limited set of lefty buzz words ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ I ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ have talked about the subsidies and asked what you meant by Socialism. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Like ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Klaus, you run. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ what subsidies? got URL ? well for ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ starters, there are gas subsidies in place for everyone in the USA. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ nope. got URL ? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ USA gas is heavily taxed by states, not a subsidy. In Kalifornia the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ tax is $0.69 per gallon. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Fed Tax is $0.184 per gallon. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ so, where is this subsidie that you talk about ? holy fuck you're stupid. https://www.google.com/search?q=petroleum+subsidy+in+usa see if you can fucking find it, feeble dolt. "The US ranked the worst out of the G7 countries, spending over $26 billion a year propping up fossil fuels. (The G7 countries are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK and the US.)" ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_taxes_in_the_United_States ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ corporations are taking advantage of those subsidies every time they ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ship a product closer to a customer. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ no, except for Amazon's deal with USPS. and they both use subsidized gasoline to get the package to the customer. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ also, corporations will be paying more than 10% less taxes next year. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ now, less tax is not a subsidy, right ? no, the 26 billion in gas subsidy, the "corporate welfare", the "tax perks" for corporations, corporations dumping their poorly paid employees onto federal assistance, and dumping the cleanup cost of the environmental damage done by corporations onto the taxpayers, are all in effect taxpayer-funded "subsidies". only a complete fucking idiot would argue otherwise. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ you and i, however, will continue paying about 30% of our income to ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ taxes. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ you make that much money !! You are a RICH PERSON. i see your attention to detail is utterly "unmatched". https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2017/03/10/whats-the-average-americans-tax-rate/98734396/ "So, what is the average American's overall tax rate? If you add up the four income-based categories of taxation (Federal, state/local, Social Security, and Medicare), the average American's effective tax rate is 29.8%. This is in addition to any consumption-based taxes paid, such as sales tax, property tax, or other taxes on specific items." one would think that someone in your "poor person" shoes wouldn't be cheerleading for corporations. idiot. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ my taxes got cut big time, oh, so did they get cut from 70% to 21% similar to how corporations have continually enjoyed since the 70's? or...? -- [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION] THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 21:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g7g1kmF33hmU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718185 |
Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 12/13/2018 12:18 AM, Snit wrote: >> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 12:56 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <...> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes >>>>>>>> the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the >>>>>>>> major >>>>>>>> polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any way >>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>> see fit? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab >>>>>>> that it is. >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the >>>>>> harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added >>>>>> green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. >>>>> >>>>> Cite. >>>> >>>> Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up again. >>>> >>>>> And stop using electricity and gasoline. >>>> >>>> That would not change how we subsidize those corporations. >>>> >>>>>> Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the >>>>>> redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is >>>>>> indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create >>>>>> lies to deny the science. >>>>> >>>>> so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the very rich >>>>> (themselves) >>>>> >>>>> as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" >>>> >>>> In France they tried to INCREASE those subsidies. They did not ask those >>>> corporations to fund themselves. >>>> >>>>>>>> Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear >>>>>>> his mamma never disciplined him. It's clear he >>>>>>> has never produced anything but hot air. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! >>>>>> >>>>>> Bottom line: you are just lashing out to not have your religion be >>>>>> questioned. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much money >>>>> you got ? >>>> >>>> And you did not define what you mean by "Socialist", nor did you have >>>> any real response to your lashing out. You are very emotional... where I >>>> am speaking of the evidence and reason. We are not likely to see eye to >>>> eye. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> emotional ? why? , you only use the words "evidence and reason", but >>> have no URLs, just a limited set of lefty buzz words >>> >> >> I have talked about the subsidies and asked what you meant by Socialism. >> Like Klaus, you run. >> > > what subsidies? got URL ? > I was talking about the labor subsidies. Do you really need to see how the government helps pay Walmart and McDonald’s employees?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 17:06 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <puuol6$1t86$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #718216 |
On 12/13/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: > Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> On 12/13/2018 12:18 AM, Snit wrote: >>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/12/2018 12:56 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <...> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes >>>>>>>>> the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the >>>>>>>>> major >>>>>>>>> polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any way >>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>> see fit? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab >>>>>>>> that it is. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the >>>>>>> harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added >>>>>>> green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cite. >>>>> >>>>> Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up again. >>>>> >>>>>> And stop using electricity and gasoline. >>>>> >>>>> That would not change how we subsidize those corporations. >>>>> >>>>>>> Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the >>>>>>> redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is >>>>>>> indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create >>>>>>> lies to deny the science. >>>>>> >>>>>> so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the very rich >>>>>> (themselves) >>>>>> >>>>>> as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" >>>>> >>>>> In France they tried to INCREASE those subsidies. They did not ask those >>>>> corporations to fund themselves. >>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear >>>>>>>> his mamma never disciplined him. It's clear he >>>>>>>> has never produced anything but hot air. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bottom line: you are just lashing out to not have your religion be >>>>>>> questioned. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much money >>>>>> you got ? >>>>> >>>>> And you did not define what you mean by "Socialist", nor did you have >>>>> any real response to your lashing out. You are very emotional... where I >>>>> am speaking of the evidence and reason. We are not likely to see eye to >>>>> eye. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> emotional ? why? , you only use the words "evidence and reason", but >>>> have no URLs, just a limited set of lefty buzz words >>>> >>> >>> I have talked about the subsidies and asked what you meant by Socialism. >>> Like Klaus, you run. >>> >> >> what subsidies? got URL ? >> > > I was talking about the labor subsidies. Do you really need to see how the > government helps pay Walmart and McDonald’s employees? > sure, got URL ? I helped an Afgan Family move into the USA, and his employer got a 2 year $10,000 each year to employ him from the feds. I never knew that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 16:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7g89vF4gpaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718237 |
On 12/13/18 4:06 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 12/13/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>> On 12/13/2018 12:18 AM, Snit wrote: >>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/2018 12:56 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <...> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that punishes >>>>>>>>>> the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to all the >>>>>>>>>> major >>>>>>>>>> polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste any way >>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>> see fit? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab >>>>>>>>> that it is. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay for the >>>>>>>> harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of the added >>>>>>>> green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cite. >>>>>> >>>>>> Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up again. >>>>>> >>>>>>> And stop using electricity and gasoline. >>>>>> >>>>>> That would not change how we subsidize those corporations. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- the >>>>>>>> redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their stance is >>>>>>>> indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so they create >>>>>>>> lies to deny the science. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the very rich >>>>>>> (themselves) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" >>>>>> >>>>>> In France they tried to INCREASE those subsidies. They did not ask those >>>>>> corporations to fund themselves. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is Snit? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear >>>>>>>>> his mamma never disciplined him. It's clear he >>>>>>>>> has never produced anything but hot air. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bottom line: you are just lashing out to not have your religion be >>>>>>>> questioned. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how much money >>>>>>> you got ? >>>>>> >>>>>> And you did not define what you mean by "Socialist", nor did you have >>>>>> any real response to your lashing out. You are very emotional... where I >>>>>> am speaking of the evidence and reason. We are not likely to see eye to >>>>>> eye. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> emotional ? why? , you only use the words "evidence and reason", but >>>>> have no URLs, just a limited set of lefty buzz words >>>>> >>>> >>>> I have talked about the subsidies and asked what you meant by Socialism. >>>> Like Klaus, you run. >>>> >>> >>> what subsidies? got URL ? >>> >> >> I was talking about the labor subsidies. Do you really need to see how the >> government helps pay Walmart and McDonald’s employees? >> > > sure, got URL ? > > I helped an Afgan Family move into the USA, and his employer got a 2 > year $10,000 each year to employ him from the feds. I never knew that. > > Have seen other sources on it before, but a few seconds of Googling shows this: http://www.walmartsubsidywatch.org And to kill the myth that this would boost prices heavily: https://youtu.be/vAcaeLmybCY -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 21:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <puv7u0$1lss$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #718243 |
On 12/13/2018 5:29 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/13/18 4:06 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 12/13/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/13/2018 12:18 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/2018 12:56 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/12/18 11:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/12/2018 10:33 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/12/18 9:11 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/2018, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <...> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trump took a wee-wee on your "Paris Agreement". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So the question is when is trump going to rejoin a plan that >>>>>>>>>>> punishes >>>>>>>>>>> the only country reducing emissions and gives the money to >>>>>>>>>>> all the >>>>>>>>>>> major >>>>>>>>>>> polluters not to spend on fighting pollution, but to waste >>>>>>>>>>> any way >>>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>> see fit? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Trump never will because he sees it for the money grab >>>>>>>>>> that it is. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Of course the denial is a money grab from the rest of us to pay >>>>>>>>> for the >>>>>>>>> harm done by the 100 or so corporations causing 70% or so of >>>>>>>>> the added >>>>>>>>> green house gases. And, of course, Trump backs that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cite. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Already posted a link showing this. If you need I can dig it up >>>>>>> again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And stop using electricity and gasoline. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That would not change how we subsidize those corporations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Trump and Republicans in general back the current money grab -- >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> redistribution of money to the very rich. They know their >>>>>>>>> stance is >>>>>>>>> indefensible -- a religious and not a reasoned stance -- so >>>>>>>>> they create >>>>>>>>> lies to deny the science. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so you want Social Democrats to redistribution of money to the >>>>>>>> very rich >>>>>>>> (themselves) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> as the French Yellow Vests say "BULLSHIT" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In France they tried to INCREASE those subsidies. They did not >>>>>>> ask those >>>>>>> corporations to fund themselves. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Or is the question just how big a dishonest liar and crook is >>>>>>>>>>> Snit? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Snit is a freaking ignorant socialist. It's clear >>>>>>>>>> his mamma never disciplined him. It's clear he >>>>>>>>>> has never produced anything but hot air. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What do you mean by Socialist? LOL! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bottom line: you are just lashing out to not have your religion be >>>>>>>>> questioned. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Bottom line" is a financial term used by Rich People for how >>>>>>>> much money >>>>>>>> you got ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And you did not define what you mean by "Socialist", nor did you >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> any real response to your lashing out. You are very emotional... >>>>>>> where I >>>>>>> am speaking of the evidence and reason. We are not likely to see >>>>>>> eye to >>>>>>> eye. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> emotional ? why? , you only use the words "evidence and reason", but >>>>>> have no URLs, just a limited set of lefty buzz words >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have talked about the subsidies and asked what you meant by >>>>> Socialism. >>>>> Like Klaus, you run. >>>>> >>>> >>>> what subsidies? got URL ? >>>> >>> >>> I was talking about the labor subsidies. Do you really need to see >>> how the >>> government helps pay Walmart and McDonald’s employees? >>> >> >> sure, got URL ? >> >> I helped an Afgan Family move into the USA, and his employer got a 2 >> year $10,000 each year to employ him from the feds. I never knew that. >> >> > > Have seen other sources on it before, but a few seconds of Googling > shows this: > > http://www.walmartsubsidywatch.org > > And to kill the myth that this would boost prices heavily: > > https://youtu.be/vAcaeLmybCY > > > Right! also, Amazon locating a new plant in Queens, got $1.5 B from state ? that promise of new jobs gets companies huge $$$$ Dell, etc they co it all. Taxpayer subsidized.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-13 20:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7gn70F7el5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #718277 |
On 12/13/18 8:26 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> sure, got URL ? >>> >>> I helped an Afgan Family move into the USA, and his employer got a 2 >>> year $10,000 each year to employ him from the feds. I never knew that. >>> >>> >> Have seen other sources on it before, but a few seconds of Googling >> shows this: >> >> http://www.walmartsubsidywatch.org >> >> And to kill the myth that this would boost prices heavily: >> >> https://youtu.be/vAcaeLmybCY >> >> >> > Right! > > also, Amazon locating a new plant in Queens, got $1.5 B from state ? > > that promise of new jobs gets companies huge $$$$ Dell, etc they co it > all. > > Taxpayer subsidized. The right wingers will say we HAVE to bribe them or the grand givers of jobs will not bless us. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web