Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #712831 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-15 01:53 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-11-29 10:29 -0500 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 44 participants
Thread has 1403 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1403 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Fake News ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-15 01:53 -0800
Re: Fake News ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-15 09:29 -0500
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 13:46 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 14:03 -0500
Re: Fake News ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-15 19:10 +0000
Re: Fake News ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-15 14:13 -0500
Re: Fake News ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-15 20:36 +0000
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 14:21 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 14:29 -0500
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 18:57 -0800
Re: Fake News ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 17:02 -0700
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 20:38 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-15 12:34 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 14:16 -0800
Kensi's idiot, dice throwing, God. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-15 11:21 -0800
Re: Relf's idiot, wavefunction collapsing God. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-16 10:34 -0500
Re: Relf's idiot, wavefunction collapsing God. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 08:40 -0700
Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-16 14:28 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-17 12:15 -0500
Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-17 12:07 -0800
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:00 -0500
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:56 -0700
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:16 -0600
You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-18 14:45 -0800
Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 15:52 -0700
Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 11:16 -0500
I'm not mainstream. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-19 14:03 -0800
Re: I'm not mainstream. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:41 -0500
" this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-20 17:22 -0800
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:16 -0500
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 11:57 -0600
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:02 -0500
Choose your cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 14:27 -0800
Re: Choose your cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:46 -0500
Re: Choose your cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 10:55 -0700
Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-23 14:37 -0800
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:39 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 10:04 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-25 15:40 +0000
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 10:44 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-25 15:55 +0000
Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 08:48 -0800
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 23:55 -0500
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:18 +0000
Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 22:19 -0800
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 06:24 +0000
Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-26 01:31 -0800
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:13 -0500
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-26 09:34 -0600
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-27 20:55 -0700
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:16 -0500
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-26 03:39 -0800
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:17 +0000
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:19 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-27 04:26 +0000
By definition, geniuses are rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 08:12 -0800
Re: By definition, geniuses are rare. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 05:16 -0500
Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-27 06:33 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 06:08 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0800
Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-28 06:37 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 07:44 -0700
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:48 -0500
99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-28 07:39 -0800
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 12:00 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 10:03 -0700
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:37 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:36 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:35 -0500
The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-29 06:19 -0800
Re: The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:21 -0500
We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-29 08:31 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:11 -0500
Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-30 05:09 -0800
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:29 -0500
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:00 +0000
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:27 -0500
Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-30 13:46 -0800
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 16:41 -0600
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:28 -0500
Kensi is the KoOky one. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 06:28 -0800
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:33 -0500
See ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 06:48 -0800
Re: See ? ! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:55 -0500
I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 07:04 -0800
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:13 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:09 +0000
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:18 -0800
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 09:31 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:35 -0700
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 14:47 -0800
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:51 -0700
Re: See ? ! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500
Re: See ? ! "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 11:47 -0500
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 10:48 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:43 -0700
Re: See ? ! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:10 +0000
Re: See ? ! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:17 -0600
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:05 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 10:48 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:44 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:49 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:54 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 13:02 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:10 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:22 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:43 -0700
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 21:52 -0600
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:09 -0500
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:51 -0700
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-01 11:48 -0600
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 12:28 -0500
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-30 10:34 -0800
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 12:28 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-30 15:09 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:53 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:59 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:23 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 12:33 -0600
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 15:54 -0500
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 18:51 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 13:54 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 14:57 -0700
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:26 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:45 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 05:17 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:43 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:49 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:08 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 17:40 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:15 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:08 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:17 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:22 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 07:46 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 00:55 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-30 09:49 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:50 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-30 09:59 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:49 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:19 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:09 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:48 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:48 -0700
Einstein was right. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 10:57 -0800
Re: Einstein was right. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:32 +0000
72 robotic alien virgins. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 17:16 -0800
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 02:03 +0000
There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 20:32 -0800
Re: There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:46 +0000
Re: There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:11 -0500
Kenzi's SciFi cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 12:02 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-23 10:08 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:51 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 12:56 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 13:23 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 13:47 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 21:53 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:57 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:58 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 22:06 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:13 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:23 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:32 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:36 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:40 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:48 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:47 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:01 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 08:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:41 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 16:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 14:51 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:46 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:42 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:44 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 00:04 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 08:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 11:04 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 09:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 11:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 11:14 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 11:26 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:45 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad813b404@gmail.invallid> - 2018-11-24 16:52 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 14:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:56 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:00 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:05 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 17:13 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Fly Tape <flÿ@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:21 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 15:26 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Fly Tape <flÿ@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:31 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 15:38 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 17:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 20:46 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 17:15 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:20 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-25 00:23 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-25 00:46 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:49 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:17 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 23:23 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:07 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:17 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 20:25 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-24 17:50 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:55 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 01:44 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 04:51 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 00:05 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:41 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:51 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:20 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 22:37 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:43 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 23:33 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:37 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 08:16 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-27 04:28 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 16:19 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 14:45 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:46 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:12 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-11-25 06:58 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:43 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:20 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 09:32 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:49 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 03:19 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:59 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 16:16 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 16:14 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 19:29 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 19:43 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 20:05 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 06:00 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:48 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:59 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:45 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 23:04 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 16:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:36 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 01:29 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:31 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:53 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:41 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:48 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:04 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:21 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:51 -0800
qBism [cubism]: correlations without correlata. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-24 04:41 -0800
Re: qBism [cubism]: correlations without correlata. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:44 -0500
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:10 -0500
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:08 +0000
Re: Einstein was right. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:07 -0500
Re: Einstein was right. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:29 +0000
Re: Einstein was right. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:34 -0700
Re: Einstein was right. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0500
Kooky like Einstein. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 14:35 -0800
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 01:14 +0000
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-23 01:36 +0000
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:47 -0700
I am crazy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 20:17 -0800
Re: I am crazy. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:30 -0500
Re: I am crazy. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:55 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 10:58 -0700
Re: I am crazy. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 13:24 -0500
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 13:48 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:05 -0700
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 14:27 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:29 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:30 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:07 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 12:54 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:02 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:33 -0700
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 19:48 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:54 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 16:58 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:55 -0800
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:28 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:30 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:04 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 21:55 +0000
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:58 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:38 -0800
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:28 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:37 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 01:30 +0000
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:32 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 03:48 +0000
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:37 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:43 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:55 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:38 -0700
Re: Kooky like Einstein. ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 15:29 -0700
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:47 +0000
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 02:16 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:39 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 18:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:01 -0500
When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-18 14:06 -0800
Re: When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 11:21 -0500
Re: When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-19 10:53 -0600
The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-19 14:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 13:07 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 12:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:23 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 12:46 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 17:00 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 22:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:08 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 06:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:38 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 08:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 09:39 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 09:31 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-03 17:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-03 17:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 16:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 06:54 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 09:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 13:10 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 12:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:01 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 11:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 11:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:01 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. skimmer <skimmy@icanthearu.net> - 2018-11-22 14:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 18:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:45 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-20 20:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-20 13:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 18:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-20 18:20 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 19:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 17:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 21:13 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 20:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 19:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-20 23:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 21:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 19:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 20:29 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-21 05:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 23:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 14:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 15:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 22:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 23:11 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:33 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:50 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:27 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 22:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 02:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:42 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 18:52 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:49 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:03 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:33 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 01:15 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 18:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 03:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 00:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 11:07 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 09:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 11:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:53 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 17:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 12:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 15:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 15:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:02 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-23 16:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-23 20:48 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:51 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:25 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 14:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:25 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:00 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:31 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:43 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:56 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:02 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:08 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 04:52 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 18:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-24 16:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 21:20 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:30 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 22:08 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 07:08 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 08:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 11:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-26 20:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 18:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 18:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-27 07:52 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 19:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 19:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 07:31 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 09:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 08:16 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 09:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 08:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 06:21 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 03:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 01:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 07:47 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 10:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 12:40 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 19:07 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:30 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 21:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:20 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 19:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 22:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 21:45 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 21:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 09:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 07:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 10:54 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 08:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:34 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 22:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:16 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:59 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:45 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:15 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 19:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-01 09:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:45 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 21:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 15:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:04 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:05 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:19 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:22 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:19 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:47 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 21:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 07:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 08:07 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 14:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:48 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 09:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 15:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 19:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:29 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:18 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:28 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.orq> - 2018-11-29 17:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:33 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:54 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 12:01 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 11:04 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-12-02 18:17 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%.com> - 2018-12-02 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 20:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 18:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 12:07 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 20:55 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-03 00:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 08:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:59 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 13:09 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 11:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:43 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 21:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 02:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-01 09:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 10:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 17:59 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 19:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:51 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:13 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 19:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 18:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:25 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 12:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-12-02 18:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 17:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:13 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 22:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:46 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 19:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 17:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 17:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 00:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:40 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:48 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 20:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 15:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%.com> - 2018-12-02 17:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 15:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 16:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 19:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 17:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 20:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 18:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 21:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:13 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 09:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 10:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 08:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 23:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-28 12:27 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 12:21 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-28 20:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:51 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:17 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 00:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:24 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-01 13:03 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 13:04 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:58 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-29 01:01 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-29 01:10 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 10:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 11:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 09:22 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 11:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:57 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:22 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 10:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:31 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 00:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:34 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 01:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:04 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:49 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:18 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:50 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 05:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 10:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 10:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 13:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 14:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:31 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 15:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:31 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-30 09:55 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:14 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 10:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:16 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:55 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:03 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:10 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 09:52 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 11:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:11 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:24 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:03 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:13 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 08:14 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:28 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 20:42 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-30 10:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:53 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-30 10:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 10:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 11:58 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 22:16 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:37 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:47 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:43 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 11:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:37 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-30 11:00 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 10:07 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-30 11:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 22:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 07:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 08:29 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 20:25 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 06:58 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:38 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-12-01 18:49 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:13 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 14:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 07:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 09:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 09:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 13:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 11:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 12:37 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 00:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:28 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 00:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 07:40 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 16:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:25 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 07:54 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 16:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 08:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 16:19 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 10:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 07:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 11:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 08:24 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 11:54 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 09:01 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 12:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 09:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 13:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 11:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:05 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 09:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:01 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 07:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 17:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 17:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 23:36 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 00:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:32 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 20:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:30 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:30 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:14 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 00:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 07:40 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:11 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 14:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-03 14:54 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:28 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:33 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:48 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:11 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:39 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:37 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:26 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 19:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:29 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 11:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 09:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 11:11 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 12:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 20:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. AOC <AOC@mineshot.org> - 2018-11-28 16:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:46 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. skimmer <skimmy@icanthearu.net> - 2018-11-29 10:29 -0500
Page 45 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 43 44 [45] 46 47 … 50 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 00:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <g6gm60F4h31U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #716058 |
Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable. Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>> >>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>>>> applying for legal US citizenship. >>>> >>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>> >>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are violating >>> Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US for a moment... >> >> >> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but that was some >> time ago and far out of my area of expertise even general knowledge. >> >> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. > > As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make sure that > they are properly feed? They need to take showers and clean their > clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the UN? > > > [...] > Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and don’t sweat it. We have plenty of resources to do so.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 16:28 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <ptv8uk$gln$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #716067 |
On 12/1/2018 4:09 PM, Snit wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable. Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>> >>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>>>>> applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>> >>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>> >>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are violating >>>> Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US for a moment... >>> >>> >>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but that was some >>> time ago and far out of my area of expertise even general knowledge. >>> >>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >> >> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make sure that >> they are properly feed? They need to take showers and clean their >> clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the UN? >> >> >> [...] >> > > Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and don’t sweat it. > We have plenty of resources to do so. > Okay, let us ponder that for a moment. I wonder if a homeless legal US citizen noticed that fact, would definitely be tempted to think about going to the border and just trying to get some extra free help as well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <g6hb8mF8n3gU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #716073 |
Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 12/1/2018 4:09 PM, Snit wrote: >> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable. Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>>>>>> applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>> >>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>> >>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are violating >>>>> Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US for a moment... >>>> >>>> >>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but that was some >>>> time ago and far out of my area of expertise even general knowledge. >>>> >>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>> >>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make sure that >>> they are properly feed? They need to take showers and clean their >>> clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the UN? >>> >>> >>> [...] >>> >> >> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and don’t sweat it. >> We have plenty of resources to do so. >> > > Okay, let us ponder that for a moment. I wonder if a homeless legal US > citizen noticed that fact, would definitely be tempted to think about > going to the border and just trying to get some extra free help as well. > We should help our own citizens in need, too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 19:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <uo960el1jandsjr16h380d9inkjuigpcga@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #716067 |
On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and don’t sweat it. >We have plenty of resources to do so. You first. Put your money where your mouth is. Invite a half dozen of them to come live with you in your house. Feed them, clean them, entertain them using your own resources before you tell somebody else to use theirs. Fucking hypocrites - all these goody-two-shoe liberals. -- Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <g6hb8mF8n3gU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #716075 |
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > >> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and don’t sweat it. >> We have plenty of resources to do so. > > You first. Put your money where your mouth is. > > Invite a half dozen of them to come live with you > in your house. Feed them, clean them, entertain > them using your own resources before you tell > somebody else to use theirs. > > Fucking hypocrites - all these goody-two-shoe > liberals. > How many unwanted children do you have living at your house? Are you against abortion?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 18:42 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366ce6658a5594bf2b9@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #716067 |
In article <g6gm60F4h31U1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable. Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>> >>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>>>>> applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>> >>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>> >>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are violating >>>> Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US for a moment... >>> >>> >>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but that was some >>> time ago and far out of my area of expertise even general knowledge. >>> >>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >> >> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make sure that >> they are properly feed? They need to take showers and clean their >> clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the UN? >> >> >> [...] >> > >Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and don?t sweat it. >We have plenty of resources to do so. Who's we?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <g6hb8lF8n3gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #716089 |
Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <g6gm60F4h31U1@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable. Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>>>>>> applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>> >>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>> >>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are violating >>>>> Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US for a moment... >>>> >>>> >>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but that was some >>>> time ago and far out of my area of expertise even general knowledge. >>>> >>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>> >>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make sure that >>> they are properly feed? They need to take showers and clean their >>> clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the UN? >>> >>> >>> [...] >>> >> >> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and don?t sweat it. >> We have plenty of resources to do so. > > Who's we? > We the US.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 00:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366d35de5f8a40b02c0@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #716135 |
In article <g6hb8lF8n3gU1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> In article <g6gm60F4h31U1@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable. Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>>>>>>> applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>> >>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are violating >>>>>> Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US for a moment... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but that was some >>>>> time ago and far out of my area of expertise even general knowledge. >>>>> >>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>> >>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make sure that >>>> they are properly feed? They need to take showers and clean their >>>> clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the UN? >>>> >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>> >>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and don?t sweat it. >>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >> >> Who's we? >> > >We the US. hy don't we help our own homeless first?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 07:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <g6hgjcF9q3oU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #716145 |
Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <g6hb8lF8n3gU1@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> In article <g6gm60F4h31U1@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> >>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable. Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>>>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>>>>>>>> applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are violating >>>>>>> Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US for a moment... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but that was some >>>>>> time ago and far out of my area of expertise even general knowledge. >>>>>> >>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>>> >>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make sure that >>>>> they are properly feed? They need to take showers and clean their >>>>> clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the UN? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>> >>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and don?t sweat it. >>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>> >>> Who's we? >>> >> >> We the US. > > hy don't we help our own homeless first? > False dichotomies are false. We can and should do both.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 08:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366da2fb837101c82c1@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #716147 |
In article <g6hgjcF9q3oU2@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> In article <g6hb8lF8n3gU1@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> In article <g6gm60F4h31U1@mid.individual.net>, >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>> >>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable. Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>>>>>>>>> applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are violating >>>>>>>> Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US for a moment... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but that was some >>>>>>> time ago and far out of my area of expertise even general knowledge. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>>>> >>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make sure that >>>>>> they are properly feed? They need to take showers and clean their >>>>>> clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the UN? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [...] >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and don?t sweat it. >>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>> >>>> Who's we? >>>> >>> >>> We the US. >> >> hy don't we help our own homeless first? >> > >False dichotomies are false. We can and should do both. But we don't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 16:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <g6ieuiFg9qbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #716188 |
Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <g6hgjcF9q3oU2@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> In article <g6hb8lF8n3gU1@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> >>>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> In article <g6gm60F4h31U1@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable. Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>>>>>>>>>> applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are violating >>>>>>>>> Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US for a moment... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but that was some >>>>>>>> time ago and far out of my area of expertise even general knowledge. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make sure that >>>>>>> they are properly feed? They need to take showers and clean their >>>>>>> clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the UN? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and don?t sweat it. >>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>> >>>>> Who's we? >>>>> >>>> >>>> We the US. >>> >>> hy don't we help our own homeless first? >>> >> >> False dichotomies are false. We can and should do both. > > But we don't. > Right. We can. We should. We don’t.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 09:01 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pu0ojm$sst$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #716145 |
On 12/2/2018 2:21 AM, Skeeter wrote: > hy don't we help our own homeless first? We should take away their taxpayer paid benefits and shoot tear gas at them and beat them until they get jobs and buy houses and stop being liberal lefties (not that that's a bad thing, some lefties are OK, if they support The President). -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 07:07 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <bptegm.fe3.19.16@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #716172 |
On 2018-12-02 7:01 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/2/2018 2:21 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> hy don't we help our own homeless first? > > We should take away their taxpayer paid benefits and shoot tear gas at > them and beat them until they get jobs and buy houses and stop being > liberal lefties (not that that's a bad thing, some lefties are OK, if > they support The President). > are they really homeless or do they just like living outside
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 14:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pu0p36$rju$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #716172 |
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 09:01:27 -0500, mixed nuts, tweeted:
> On 12/2/2018 2:21 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> hy don't we help our own homeless first?
>
> We should take away their taxpayer paid benefits and shoot tear gas at
> them and beat them until they get jobs and buy houses and stop being
> liberal lefties (not that that's a bad thing, some lefties are OK, if
> they support The President).
New National Homelesssteading Law.
If a homeless person takes possesiom of your home, it's his.
What better way to prove our deep concern for the plight of the homeless.
That way, everyone has equal opportunity to be homeless for a bit.
Don't build no walls around your houses, neither.
Unconstitutional.
--
HOGAN'S HEROES DRINKING GAME --
Take a shot every time:
-- Sergeant Schultz says, "I knoooooowww nooooothing!"
-- General Burkhalter or Major Hochstetter intimidate/insult Colonel Klink.
-- Colonel Klink falls for Colonel Hogan's flattery.
-- One of the prisoners sneaks out of camp (one shot for each prisoner to go).
-- Colonel Klink snaps to attention after answering the phone (two shots
if it's one of our heroes on the other end).
-- One of the Germans is threatened with being sent to the Russian front.
-- Corporal Newkirk calls up a German in his phoney German accent, and
tricks him (two shots if it's Colonel Klink).
-- Hogan has a romantic interlude with a beautiful girl from the underground.
-- Colonel Klink relates how he's never had an escape from Stalag 13.
-- Sergeant Schultz gives up a secret (two shots if he's bribed with food).
-- The prisoners listen to the Germans' conversation by a hidden transmitter.
-- Sergeant Schultz "captures" one of the prisoners after an escape.
-- Lebeau pronounces "colonel" as "cuh-loh-`nell".
-- Carter builds some kind of device (two shots if it's not explosive).
-- Lebeau wears his apron.
-- Hogan says "We've got no choice" when someone claims that the plan is
impossible.
-- The prisoners capture an important German, and sneak him out
the tunnel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 07:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <bptf03.488.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #716174 |
On 2018-12-02 7:09 a.m., Spooge wrote: > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 09:01:27 -0500, mixed nuts, tweeted: >> On 12/2/2018 2:21 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> hy don't we help our own homeless first? >> >> We should take away their taxpayer paid benefits and shoot tear gas at >> them and beat them until they get jobs and buy houses and stop being >> liberal lefties (not that that's a bad thing, some lefties are OK, if >> they support The President). > > New National Homelesssteading Law. > If a homeless person takes possesiom of your home, it's his. > What better way to prove our deep concern for the plight of the homeless. > That way, everyone has equal opportunity to be homeless for a bit. > Don't build no walls around your houses, neither. > Unconstitutional. > i think i would have to blow up my house
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 14:17 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pu0pig$5pn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #716175 |
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 07:16:02 -0700, %, tweeted:
> On 2018-12-02 7:09 a.m., Spooge wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 09:01:27 -0500, mixed nuts, tweeted:
>>> On 12/2/2018 2:21 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> hy don't we help our own homeless first?
>>>
>>> We should take away their taxpayer paid benefits and shoot tear gas at
>>> them and beat them until they get jobs and buy houses and stop being
>>> liberal lefties (not that that's a bad thing, some lefties are OK, if
>>> they support The President).
>>
>> New National Homelesssteading Law.
>> If a homeless person takes possesiom of your home, it's his.
>> What better way to prove our deep concern for the plight of the homeless.
>> That way, everyone has equal opportunity to be homeless for a bit.
>> Don't build no walls around your houses, neither.
>> Unconstitutional.
>>
> i think i would have to blow up my house
Or their house, depending on what side of the front door your looking at.
--
HOGAN'S HEROES DRINKING GAME --
Take a shot every time:
-- Sergeant Schultz says, "I knoooooowww nooooothing!"
-- General Burkhalter or Major Hochstetter intimidate/insult Colonel Klink.
-- Colonel Klink falls for Colonel Hogan's flattery.
-- One of the prisoners sneaks out of camp (one shot for each prisoner to go).
-- Colonel Klink snaps to attention after answering the phone (two shots
if it's one of our heroes on the other end).
-- One of the Germans is threatened with being sent to the Russian front.
-- Corporal Newkirk calls up a German in his phoney German accent, and
tricks him (two shots if it's Colonel Klink).
-- Hogan has a romantic interlude with a beautiful girl from the underground.
-- Colonel Klink relates how he's never had an escape from Stalag 13.
-- Sergeant Schultz gives up a secret (two shots if he's bribed with food).
-- The prisoners listen to the Germans' conversation by a hidden transmitter.
-- Sergeant Schultz "captures" one of the prisoners after an escape.
-- Lebeau pronounces "colonel" as "cuh-loh-`nell".
-- Carter builds some kind of device (two shots if it's not explosive).
-- Lebeau wears his apron.
-- Hogan says "We've got no choice" when someone claims that the plan is
impossible.
-- The prisoners capture an important German, and sneak him out
the tunnel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 07:20 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <bptf81.488.17.8@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #716176 |
On 2018-12-02 7:17 a.m., Spooge wrote: > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 07:16:02 -0700, %, tweeted: >> On 2018-12-02 7:09 a.m., Spooge wrote: >>> On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 09:01:27 -0500, mixed nuts, tweeted: >>>> On 12/2/2018 2:21 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> hy don't we help our own homeless first? >>>> >>>> We should take away their taxpayer paid benefits and shoot tear gas at >>>> them and beat them until they get jobs and buy houses and stop being >>>> liberal lefties (not that that's a bad thing, some lefties are OK, if >>>> they support The President). >>> >>> New National Homelesssteading Law. >>> If a homeless person takes possesiom of your home, it's his. >>> What better way to prove our deep concern for the plight of the homeless. >>> That way, everyone has equal opportunity to be homeless for a bit. >>> Don't build no walls around your houses, neither. >>> Unconstitutional. >>> >> i think i would have to blow up my house > > Or their house, depending on what side of the front door your looking at. > no i'd do it while it was still my house , or maybe i would just charge the homeless person with tresspassing
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 09:25 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pu0q0k$vfi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #716175 |
On 12/2/2018 9:16 AM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-02 7:09 a.m., Spooge wrote: >> On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 09:01:27 -0500, mixed nuts, tweeted: >>> On 12/2/2018 2:21 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> hy don't we help our own homeless first? >>> >>> We should take away their taxpayer paid benefits and shoot tear gas at >>> them and beat them until they get jobs and buy houses and stop being >>> liberal lefties (not that that's a bad thing, some lefties are OK, if >>> they support The President). >> >> New National Homelesssteading Law. >> If a homeless person takes possesiom of your home, it's his. >> What better way to prove our deep concern for the plight of the homeless. >> That way, everyone has equal opportunity to be homeless for a bit. >> Don't build no walls around your houses, neither. >> Unconstitutional. >> > i think i would have to blow up my house You could just stop raking, and have a forest fire. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 07:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <bptfo6.f43.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #716178 |
On 2018-12-02 7:25 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/2/2018 9:16 AM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-02 7:09 a.m., Spooge wrote: >>> On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 09:01:27 -0500, mixed nuts, tweeted: >>>> On 12/2/2018 2:21 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> hy don't we help our own homeless first? >>>> >>>> We should take away their taxpayer paid benefits and shoot tear gas at >>>> them and beat them until they get jobs and buy houses and stop being >>>> liberal lefties (not that that's a bad thing, some lefties are OK, if >>>> they support The President). >>> >>> New National Homelesssteading Law. >>> If a homeless person takes possesiom of your home, it's his. >>> What better way to prove our deep concern for the plight of the >>> homeless. >>> That way, everyone has equal opportunity to be homeless for a bit. >>> Don't build no walls around your houses, neither. >>> Unconstitutional. >>> >> i think i would have to blow up my house > > You could just stop raking, and have a forest fire. > i don't want to hurt anything but the house
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 09:41 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pu0quo$10o8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #716174 |
On 12/2/2018 9:09 AM, Spooge wrote: > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 09:01:27 -0500, mixed nuts, tweeted: >> On 12/2/2018 2:21 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> hy don't we help our own homeless first? >> >> We should take away their taxpayer paid benefits and shoot tear gas at >> them and beat them until they get jobs and buy houses and stop being >> liberal lefties (not that that's a bad thing, some lefties are OK, if >> they support The President). > > New National Homelesssteading Law. > If a homeless person takes possesiom of your home, it's his. > What better way to prove our deep concern for the plight of the homeless. > That way, everyone has equal opportunity to be homeless for a bit. > Don't build no walls around your houses, neither. > Unconstitutional. Factory people and real estate developers (shopping malls and condoms especially) already do that. Railroad companies used to do that too, but they mostly stopped because nobody builds railroads anymore because railroads don't go to China or Europe where the stuff comes from plus you can't make money on parking garages if people take trains. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 45 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 43 44 [45] 46 47 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web