Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #713997 > unrolled thread

If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can?

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-11-22 12:26 -0500
Last post2018-11-25 12:13 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 103 — 18 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 12:26 -0500
    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 10:38 -0700
      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-22 09:41 -0800
      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 11:58 -0600
      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:33 -0700
    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-11-22 12:47 -0700
      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:57 -0700
        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-22 12:06 -0800
          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 13:19 -0700
            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-22 12:40 -0800
              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 13:46 -0700
                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-22 13:31 -0800
                  Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 14:48 -0700
                    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-22 17:46 -0800
                      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 18:55 -0700
                        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-22 17:58 -0800
                        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 19:03 -0700
                          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 19:06 -0700
                            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-22 18:11 -0800
                              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 19:15 -0700
                                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-22 18:22 -0800
                                  Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 03:36 +0000
                                    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 20:49 -0700
                                      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-23 03:22 -0800
                                    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:49 -0700
                            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:40 -0700
                              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 19:43 -0700
                                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-22 18:44 -0800
                        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 19:06 -0700
                          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-22 18:10 -0800
            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-11-22 21:38 -0700
              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 21:40 -0700
                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-25 20:24 -0600
                  Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-26 03:52 +0100
                    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-25 22:29 -0500
                      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-26 10:21 -0600
                        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-26 21:42 +0100
                          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-26 14:30 -0800
                    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 03:41 -0800
        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:36 -0700
          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 16:39 -0700
            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-24 18:34 -0600
              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 17:59 -0700
          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 16:53 -0700
            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:38 -0700
              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 03:37 +0000
                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:39 -0700
        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-11-22 21:36 -0700
          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 21:48 -0700
      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:01 -0700
        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 13:21 -0700
          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:25 -0700
            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 13:39 -0700
              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:44 -0700
                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 13:45 -0700
                  Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:53 -0700
                    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 14:47 -0700
                      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 19:10 -0700
                    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-22 19:24 -0300
                      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? "Sir Gregøry Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 17:28 -0500
                        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 15:36 -0700
                          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-22 19:45 -0300
                          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? "Sir Gregøry Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 17:47 -0500
                            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 15:49 -0700
                              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? "Sir Gregøry Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 17:55 -0500
                                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 15:58 -0700
                                  Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? "Sir Gregøry Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 18:00 -0500
                                    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 16:07 -0700
                                      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? "Sir Gregøry Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 18:13 -0500
                                        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 16:18 -0700
                                          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? "Sir Gregøry Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 18:22 -0500
                      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 15:35 -0700
                        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-23 01:30 +0000
                      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-24 18:28 -0600
                        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 19:36 -0500
                          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:13 +0000
                            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 20:21 -0500
                              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:32 +0000
                                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 02:03 -0800
                                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:10 -0500
                            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:18 -0700
                        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 06:15 -0800
                          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:12 -0500
                          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-25 14:04 -0600
                            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 13:09 -0700
                            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 19:43 -0800
                              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 15:47 -0700
                                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 04:25 -0800
                              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-25 17:52 -0600
                                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 17:47 -0700
                                  Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 18:09 -0700
                                    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 18:39 -0700
                                      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 18:42 -0700
                                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 03:11 -0800
                                  Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-26 13:06 -0600
                                    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 12:14 -0700
                                      Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-26 14:27 -0500
                                        Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 12:34 -0700
                                          Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-26 16:27 -0500
                                            Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 16:28 -0700
              Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:38 -0700
                Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 16:52 -0700
    Re: If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can? consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 12:13 -0800

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

#713997 — If celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can?

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-11-22 12:26 -0500
SubjectIf celebrity victims of climate change can't silence the deniers, who can?
Message-ID<pt6osc$9vh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
The California wildfires have shown that even the rich and famous are 
not immune to climate change:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/14/if-celebrity-victims-of-climate-change-cant-silence-the-deniers-who-can

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#714001

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-22 10:38 -0700
Message-ID<g5o7t0Fn6oaU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#713997
On 11/22/18 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
> The California wildfires have shown that even the rich and famous are 
> not immune to climate change:
> 
> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/14/if-celebrity-victims-of-climate-change-cant-silence-the-deniers-who-can 
> 
> 
But we ALL pay for it.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714003

FromKlaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>
Date2018-11-22 09:41 -0800
Message-ID<jhqdvdthbgsudbohq39lehng8s9jhlrtkb@4ax.com>
In reply to#714001
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:38:40 -0700, Snit
<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>On 11/22/18 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>> The California wildfires have shown that even the rich and famous are 
>> not immune to climate change:
>> 
>> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/14/if-celebrity-victims-of-climate-change-cant-silence-the-deniers-who-can 
>> 
>> 
>But we ALL pay for it.

But don't you claim the rich get "socialist welfare" or some such
made-up bullshit?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714005

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-11-22 11:58 -0600
Message-ID<pt6qol$d4o$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#714001
On 11/22/2018 11:38 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 11/22/18 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>> The California wildfires have shown that even the rich and famous are
>> not immune to climate change:
>>
>> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/14/if-celebrity-victims-of-climate-change-cant-silence-the-deniers-who-can
>>
>>
> But we ALL pay for it.
> 

the real problem with Climate Change is that the Ocean Waves will get
bigger,

Surfs UP!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714086

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-22 16:33 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3660eac43d24469ee@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#714001
In article <g5o7t0Fn6oaU1@mid.individual.net>, 
usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says...
>
>On 11/22/18 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>> The California wildfires have shown that even the rich and famous are 
>> not immune to climate change:
>> 
>> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/14/if-celebrity-victims-of-climate-change-cant-silence-the-deniers-who-can 
>> 
>> 
>But we ALL pay for it.

Not me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714026

FromJust Wondering <JW@me.com>
Date2018-11-22 12:47 -0700
Message-ID<OJDJD.599674$OM2.21840@fx37.iad>
In reply to#713997
On 11/22/2018 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
> The California wildfires have shown that even the rich 
> and famous are not immune to climate change

No, the California wildfires have shown that even the
rich and famous are not immune to wildfires.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714029

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-22 12:57 -0700
Message-ID<g5og0eFoubfU6@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#714026
On 11/22/18 12:47 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
> On 11/22/2018 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>> The California wildfires have shown that even the rich and famous are 
>> not immune to climate change
> 
> No, the California wildfires have shown that even the
> rich and famous are not immune to wildfires.

And the fires are IN PART because of climate change. Sure.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714032

FromKlaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>
Date2018-11-22 12:06 -0800
Message-ID<q13evd17dq5hc8c6e3f93cunb2stahg01v@4ax.com>
In reply to#714029
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:57:02 -0700, Snit
<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>On 11/22/18 12:47 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>> On 11/22/2018 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> The California wildfires have shown that even the rich and famous are 
>>> not immune to climate change
>> 
>> No, the California wildfires have shown that even the
>> rich and famous are not immune to wildfires.
>
>And the fires are IN PART because of climate change. 

I'm sure you desperately need to believe this.

More on Snit's trolling
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html

Over 100 people ridicule Snit
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html

Typical Snit trolling methods
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714034

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-22 13:19 -0700
Message-ID<g5ohafFp7htU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#714032
On 11/22/18 1:06 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:57:02 -0700, Snit
> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 11/22/18 12:47 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>> On 11/22/2018 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> The California wildfires have shown that even the rich and famous are
>>>> not immune to climate change
>>>
>>> No, the California wildfires have shown that even the
>>> rich and famous are not immune to wildfires.
>>
>> And the fires are IN PART because of climate change.
> 
> I'm sure you desperately need to believe this.

What makes you think "desperation" is needed to accept science and the 
evidence that backs it?

And off you run in 3... 2... 1...

...


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714045

FromKlaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>
Date2018-11-22 12:40 -0800
Message-ID<005evdlt8i110vug7a1oa3nvtg6cjdcesu@4ax.com>
In reply to#714034
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:19:27 -0700, Snit
<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>On 11/22/18 1:06 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:57:02 -0700, Snit
>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 11/22/18 12:47 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>> On 11/22/2018 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> The California wildfires have shown that even the rich and famous are
>>>>> not immune to climate change
>>>>
>>>> No, the California wildfires have shown that even the
>>>> rich and famous are not immune to wildfires.
>>>
>>> And the fires are IN PART because of climate change.
>> 
>> I'm sure you desperately need to believe this.
>
>What makes you think "desperation" is needed to accept science and the 
>evidence that backs it?

You're right- I should have said "desperate rage."

I stand corrected.

Your desperate rage requires you to believe this.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714050

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-22 13:46 -0700
Message-ID<g5oit6FpgafU6@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#714045
On 11/22/18 1:40 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:19:27 -0700, Snit
> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 11/22/18 1:06 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:57:02 -0700, Snit
>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/22/18 12:47 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>> On 11/22/2018 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>> The California wildfires have shown that even the rich and famous are
>>>>>> not immune to climate change
>>>>>
>>>>> No, the California wildfires have shown that even the
>>>>> rich and famous are not immune to wildfires.
>>>>
>>>> And the fires are IN PART because of climate change.
>>>
>>> I'm sure you desperately need to believe this.
>>
>> What makes you think "desperation" is needed to accept science and the
>> evidence that backs it?
> 
> You're right- I should have said "desperate rage."
> 
> I stand corrected.
> 
> Your desperate rage requires you to believe this.

You project a lot. And dodge a lot.

The acceptance of science and scientific evidence merely takes being 
reasonable... no matter how much you belittle the idea.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714054

FromKlaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>
Date2018-11-22 13:31 -0800
Message-ID<kv7evdlp7j2m2dj949k20hdgtnuo1c98qv@4ax.com>
In reply to#714050
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:46:30 -0700, Snit
<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>What makes you think "desperation" is needed to accept science and the 
>>>evidence that backs it?
>>
>>You're right- I should have said "desperate rage."
>>
>>I stand corrected.
>>
>>Your desperate rage requires you to believe this.

>You project a lot. 
        ^^^^

You didn't spell "describe" correctly.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714057

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-22 14:48 -0700
Message-ID<g5omiaFqc7vU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#714054
On 11/22/18 2:31 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:46:30 -0700, Snit
> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> What makes you think "desperation" is needed to accept science and the
>>>> evidence that backs it?
>>>
>>> You're right- I should have said "desperate rage."
>>>
>>> I stand corrected.
>>>
>>> Your desperate rage requires you to believe this.
> 
>> You project a lot.
>          ^^^^
> 
> You didn't spell "describe" correctly.
> 

I did not use the word "describe", but you knew that. You are merely 
crying again.

You repeatedly project your anger. That is simply a fact.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714108

FromKlaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>
Date2018-11-22 17:46 -0800
Message-ID<vumevdlmjutal2log43s1s8k9m2uhu0nss@4ax.com>
In reply to#714057
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:48:58 -0700, Snit
<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>>>>>What makes you think "desperation" is needed to accept science and the 
>>>>>evidence that backs it?
>>>>
>>>>You're right- I should have said "desperate rage."
>>>>
>>>>I stand corrected.
>>>>
>>>>Your desperate rage requires you to believe this.
>>
>>>You project a lot. 
>>        ^^^^
>>
>>You didn't spell "describe" correctly.

>I did not use the word "describe", but you knew that. 

That's the word you meant to use.


More on Snit's trolling
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html

Over 100 people ridicule Snit
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html

Typical Snit trolling methods
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714109

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-22 18:55 -0700
Message-ID<g5p4vsFt9ckU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#714108
On 11/22/18 6:46 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:48:58 -0700, Snit
> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>>> What makes you think "desperation" is needed to accept science and the
>>>>>> evidence that backs it?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're right- I should have said "desperate rage."
>>>>>
>>>>> I stand corrected.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your desperate rage requires you to believe this.
>>>
>>>> You project a lot.
>>>         ^^^^
>>>
>>> You didn't spell "describe" correctly.
> 
>> I did not use the word "describe", but you knew that.
> 
> That's the word you meant to use.

Ah, you mean you are trolling me for attention. Got it.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714111

FromKlaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>
Date2018-11-22 17:58 -0800
Message-ID<fjnevdddnhrakprlhoad1ofcboadkmv401@4ax.com>
In reply to#714109
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 18:55:08 -0700, Snit
<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>What makes you think "desperation" is needed to accept science and the 
>>>>>>>evidence that backs it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You're right- I should have said "desperate rage."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I stand corrected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Your desperate rage requires you to believe this.
>>>>
>>>>>You project a lot. 
>>>>        ^^^^
>>>>
>>>>You didn't spell "describe" correctly.
>>
>>>I did not use the word "describe", but you knew that. 
>>
>>That's the word you meant to use.
>>
>>
>>More on Snit's trolling
>>http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>
>>Over 100 people ridicule Snit
>>http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>
>>Typical Snit trolling methods
>>http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

>Ah, you mean 

I didn't give you permission to speak for me.

You meant to say "Klaus, you describe me accurately a lot."

Which would be about the only truthful thing you've ever posted.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714112

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-22 19:03 -0700
Message-ID<bp4cmu.ilj.19.9@news.alt.net>
In reply to#714109
On 2018-11-22 6:55 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 11/22/18 6:46 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:48:58 -0700, Snit
>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> What makes you think "desperation" is needed to accept science 
>>>>>>> and the
>>>>>>> evidence that backs it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're right- I should have said "desperate rage."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I stand corrected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your desperate rage requires you to believe this.
>>>>
>>>>> You project a lot.
>>>>         ^^^^
>>>>
>>>> You didn't spell "describe" correctly.
>>
>>> I did not use the word "describe", but you knew that.
>>
>> That's the word you meant to use.
> 
> Ah, you mean you are trolling me for attention. Got it.
> 
> 
and you're replying to be ignored is that it

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714114

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-22 19:06 -0700
Message-ID<g5p5liFtdgbU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#714112
On 11/22/18 7:03 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-11-22 6:55 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 11/22/18 6:46 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:48:58 -0700, Snit
>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> What makes you think "desperation" is needed to accept science 
>>>>>>>> and the
>>>>>>>> evidence that backs it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're right- I should have said "desperate rage."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I stand corrected.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your desperate rage requires you to believe this.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You project a lot.
>>>>>         ^^^^
>>>>>
>>>>> You didn't spell "describe" correctly.
>>>
>>>> I did not use the word "describe", but you knew that.
>>>
>>> That's the word you meant to use.
>>
>> Ah, you mean you are trolling me for attention. Got it.
>>
>>
> and you're replying to be ignored is that it

I openly admit my tendency to respond to trolling posts does not speak 
well of me.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714117

FromKlaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>
Date2018-11-22 18:11 -0800
Message-ID<7doevddbl8lf1lgmdina503ic1bbmkneq8@4ax.com>
In reply to#714114
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:06:42 -0700, Snit
<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>I openly admit my tendency to post trolling posts 

I fixed that for ya buddy!

More on Snit's trolling
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html

Over 100 people ridicule Snit
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html

Typical Snit trolling methods
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714118

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-11-22 19:15 -0700
Message-ID<g5p66iFtge3U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#714117
On 11/22/18 7:11 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:06:42 -0700, Snit
> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> I realize Klaus does nothing but troll.
> 
> I fixed that for ya buddy!

Whatever. You are at that level of boring I warned you about. Better 
improve if you want more attention.

And you ABSOLUTELY do.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web