Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #713741 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-21 11:09 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-11-22 16:41 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 96 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:09 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 11:24 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:44 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 09:40 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. Its Actually Worse Than That. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 11:49 -0600
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-11-21 10:50 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 10:34 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-21 13:57 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 11:59 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-21 14:25 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 12:28 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 10:55 -0600
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 13:17 -0600
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 12:22 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-21 14:40 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:07 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-21 17:09 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 10:53 -0600
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-21 21:28 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:08 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 17:11 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 15:16 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 17:21 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 15:44 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 18:26 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:29 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 18:47 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:02 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 19:12 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:14 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 19:19 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:26 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 19:40 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-21 19:12 -0600
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 20:20 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-11-22 01:27 +0000
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-21 21:41 -0600
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 06:45 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 09:34 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 07:38 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 06:44 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 16:16 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 06:43 -0700
In which Gleggrg the Ghastly Gargling Ghoul again confesses to illegally defiling the waterways with his filth Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:32 +0000
Re: In which Gleggrg the Ghastly Gargling Ghoul again confesses to illegally defiling the waterways with his filth "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 20:37 -0500
Re: In which Gleggrg the Ghastly Gargling Ghoul again confesses to illegally defiling the waterways with his filth Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-22 06:14 +0000
Re: In which Gleggrg the Ghastly Gargling Ghoul again confesses to illegally defiling the waterways with his filth Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 14:00 -0800
Re: In which Gleggrg the Ghastly Gargling Ghoul again confesses to illegally defiling the waterways with his filth Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 06:16 +0000
Re: In which Gleggrg the Ghastly Gargling Ghoul again confesses to illegally defiling the waterways with his filth Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 22:02 -0800
Re: In which Gleggrg the Ghastly Gargling Ghoul again confesses to illegally defiling the waterways with his filth Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-22 06:15 +0000
Re: In which Gleggrg the Ghastly Gargling Ghoul again confesses to illegally defiling the waterways with his filth "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 10:26 -0500
Re: In which Gleggrg the Ghastly Gargling Ghoul again confesses to illegally defiling the waterways with his filth Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 08:54 -0800
Re: In which Gleggrg the Ghastly Gargling Ghoul again confesses to illegally defiling the waterways with his filth "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 16:19 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 21:58 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 21:57 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 16:04 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:09 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 18:28 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:31 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 18:50 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 16:52 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 19:03 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:14 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-21 20:50 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 16:42 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-21 15:49 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 16:58 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-21 16:16 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:21 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-11-21 16:28 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:35 +0000
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 06:37 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-22 06:45 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 11:04 -0600
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 18:59 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:01 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-11-22 00:16 +0000
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 18:57 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:05 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-22 00:08 +0000
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-21 23:57 +0000
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:04 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-22 00:57 +0000
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 22:13 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 19:06 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:09 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-11-22 00:57 +0000
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-24 17:33 -0600
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 21:56 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 15:17 -0700
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. Its Actually Worse Than That. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 11:48 -0600
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:24 +0000
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-11-22 09:44 -0800
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:42 -0500
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It’s Actually Worse Than That. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:41 +0000
Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It?s Actually Worse Than That. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:41 -0700
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 16:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g5m9ddFa60fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #713837 |
On 11/21/18 4:50 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:31:17 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2018-11-21 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> <...> >>> >>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>>> skulls. >>>>> >>>>> LOL >>>> >>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>> >>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >>> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>> >>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >>> global warming. >>> >> it doesn't matter what the cause is , >> the mountains here that had snow on top , >> don't have any snow any more , >> why you might ask , global warming > > That's called weather. Snow is precipitation > and precipitation varies year to year. > > Even some ski resorts fail to get snow from > time to time and they are built where there > is usually snow. > > Those idiots are talking global warming which > means the whole Earth is warming. The whole > Earth is NOT warming. It's a hoax. > How do you figure it is not warming? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 19:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bfsbvd1v4vq38jcsokrkv26e1gld16joko@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #713838 |
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:52:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 11/21/18 4:50 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:31:17 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2018-11-21 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> <...> >>>> >>>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>>>> skulls. >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL >>>>> >>>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>>> >>>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >>>> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>>> >>>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >>>> global warming. >>>> >>> it doesn't matter what the cause is , >>> the mountains here that had snow on top , >>> don't have any snow any more , >>> why you might ask , global warming >> >> That's called weather. Snow is precipitation >> and precipitation varies year to year. >> >> Even some ski resorts fail to get snow from >> time to time and they are built where there >> is usually snow. >> >> Those idiots are talking global warming which >> means the whole Earth is warming. The whole >> Earth is NOT warming. It's a hoax. >> >How do you figure it is not warming? Until there is reliable data that the whole Earth is warming it can be safely assumed to NOT be the case and there exists NO SUCH RELIABLE data. All there is biased, slanted and erroneous data proffered by global warming kooks who mostly make it up and/or throw out any data that doesn't support their bogus claim. -- Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 17:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g5mao0FadrqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #713845 |
On 11/21/18 5:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:52:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/21/18 4:50 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:31:17 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 2018-11-21 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> <...> >>>>> >>>>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>>>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>>>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>>>>> skulls. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>>>> >>>>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >>>>> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>>>> >>>>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>>>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >>>>> global warming. >>>>> >>>> it doesn't matter what the cause is , >>>> the mountains here that had snow on top , >>>> don't have any snow any more , >>>> why you might ask , global warming >>> >>> That's called weather. Snow is precipitation >>> and precipitation varies year to year. >>> >>> Even some ski resorts fail to get snow from >>> time to time and they are built where there >>> is usually snow. >>> >>> Those idiots are talking global warming which >>> means the whole Earth is warming. The whole >>> Earth is NOT warming. It's a hoax. >>> >> How do you figure it is not warming? > > Until there is reliable data that the whole Earth > is warming it can be safely assumed to NOT be the > case and there exists NO SUCH RELIABLE data. You say "until" as if this is not the case. Maybe you are looking for ALL areas on the globe and not an average? > All there is biased, slanted and erroneous data > proffered by global warming kooks who mostly > make it up and/or throw out any data that doesn't > support their bogus claim. Ah, you deny the scientific evidence. Got it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 20:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pt5214$1bal$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #713845 |
On 11/21/2018 7:03 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > All there is biased, slanted and erroneous data > proffered by global warming kooks who mostly > make it up and/or throw out any data that doesn't > support their bogus claim. You should write the definitive paper proving the truth of your assertions, using bible quotes, while selling food buckets on tv which can also be used for pooping, for people who are victims of climate change. Then you could win a special Presidential Prize Medal for being a very smart and loyal boy and then you'll have enough money to buy several jets and several yachts which can travel the world while you spread the Word in the silent language of god (which is unspoken American - same as Jesus). -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 16:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g5m8r1Fa2bnU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #713831 |
On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > <...> > >>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>> skulls. >>> >>> LOL >> >> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. > > I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and > that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. > > There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* > when it comes to human caused or any other caused > global warming. > What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have heard any scientist use. As far as man-made global climate change, it is very well established and accepted. The fact many conservatives reject it as a part of their worship of the wealthy does not reduce the quality of the science at all (at least not directly, it does make it harder to do continued research and the like). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 15:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fjrbvddbf1o0p8lm0lpo64filmadajqnit@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #713834 |
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:25 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> <...> >> >>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>> skulls. >>>> >>>> LOL >>> >>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >> >> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >> >> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >> global warming. >> > >What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have >heard any scientist use. Lots of people use the term. It's amazing that you don't know this. https://www.google.com/search?num=50&rlz=1C1AVNC_enUS605US605&ei=ce71W8-NNYec0gKbzKvQAg&q=%22settled+science%22&oq=%22settled+science%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i7i30j0j0i30l2.3754.4789..6151...0.0..0.76.152.2......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i22i30.IXkVu2xUivM Well, it's not really THAT surprising, since you're ignorant on SO many things, and can't understand half of what you read.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 16:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g5m9odFa8okU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #713836 |
On 11/21/18 4:49 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:25 -0700, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> <...> >>> >>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>>> skulls. >>>>> >>>>> LOL >>>> >>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>> >>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >>> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>> >>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >>> global warming. >>> >> >> What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have >> heard any scientist use. > > Lots of people use the term. It's amazing that you don't know this. > > https://www.google.com/search?num=50&rlz=1C1AVNC_enUS605US605&ei=ce71W8-NNYec0gKbzKvQAg&q=%22settled+science%22&oq=%22settled+science%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i7i30j0j0i30l2.3754.4789..6151...0.0..0.76.152.2......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i22i30.IXkVu2xUivM You back my point here. Look at your own link. Here is the first hit on my browser (they can very based on location and other factors) <https://www.skepticalscience.com/settled-science.htm> ----- Skeptics often claim that the science of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is not “settled”. But to the extent that this statement is true it is trivial, and to the extent that it is important it is false. No science is ever “settled”; science deals in probabilities, not certainties. When the probability of something approaches 100%, then we can regard the science, colloquially, as “settled”. ----- Notice how the site does not really push that phrase at all, but responds to those who deny the science and use it. It then explains why it could colloquially be called "settled" but does not push that phrase in any way. The fact is science is NEVER "settled", as in "done". Look at the laws of motion... they have been superseded in many areas by Relativity, but they still work as a model even when we know they are not complete. But the science goes on... even with the "settled" part being only an approximation. With that said, I have heard people RESPONDING to those who deny the science and use the term "Settled" with the use of the same term. But that is not the same as scientists using the term... it simply is not a good one. > Well, it's not really THAT surprising, since you're ignorant on SO > many things, and can't understand half of what you read. Your own link shot you down. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 16:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61tbvddke94gd9hvl118f3jqm7pkcb4d59@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #713841 |
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:58:04 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 11/21/18 4:49 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:25 -0700, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> <...> >>>> >>>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>>>> skulls. >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL >>>>> >>>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>>> >>>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >>>> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>>> >>>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >>>> global warming. >>>> >>> >>> What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have >>> heard any scientist use. >> >> Lots of people use the term. It's amazing that you don't know this. >> >> https://www.google.com/search?num=50&rlz=1C1AVNC_enUS605US605&ei=ce71W8-NNYec0gKbzKvQAg&q=%22settled+science%22&oq=%22settled+science%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i7i30j0j0i30l2.3754.4789..6151...0.0..0.76.152.2......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i22i30.IXkVu2xUivM > >You back my point here. Look at your own link. Here is the first hit on >my browser (they can very based on location and other factors) > ><https://www.skepticalscience.com/settled-science.htm> >----- >Skeptics often claim that the science of anthropogenic global warming >(AGW) is not “settled”. But to the extent that this statement is true it >is trivial, and to the extent that it is important it is false. No >science is ever “settled”; science deals in probabilities, not >certainties. When the probability of something approaches 100%, then we >can regard the science, colloquially, as “settled”. >----- > >Notice how the site does not really push that phrase at all, but >responds to those who deny the science and use it. It then explains why >it could colloquially be called "settled" but does not push that phrase >in any way. > >The fact is science is NEVER "settled", as in "done". Look at the laws >of motion... they have been superseded in many areas by Relativity, but >they still work as a model even when we know they are not complete. But >the science goes on... even with the "settled" part being only an >approximation. > >With that said, I have heard people RESPONDING to those who deny the >science and use the term "Settled" with the use of the same term. But >that is not the same as scientists using the term... it simply is not a >good one. As usual, you do not read replies to your message, choosing instead of lash out in anger. Fair enough. As I clearly stated, and your blind rage prevented you from understanding, is that many PEOPLE use the term "settled science." You claim you never heard a SCIENTIST use it. Since you can't prove that, and you offer no proof, and you are a troll, we have to assume you are lying again. It's just that simple. >> Well, it's not really THAT surprising, since you're ignorant on SO >> many things, and can't understand half of what you read. > >Your own link shot you down. :) My own link supported EXACTLY what I said. But your trolling behavior and rage made you think differently. As usual, it's a pleasure to school you once again. While nowhere NEAR a scientist, your own President Obama claimed it was settled. President Obama tried to move on, echoing something the scientists had been saying for a long time: “The debate is settled,” he said, “climate change is a fact.” http://time.com/4308518/climate-change-settled-science/ Obama says scientists are saying it. Are you breaking with him and calling him a liar? Looking forward to your angry, spastic response. [chuckle]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 17:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g5mb4vFadrqU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #713858 |
On 11/21/18 5:16 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:58:04 -0700, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 11/21/18 4:49 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:25 -0700, Snit >>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> <...> >>>>> >>>>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>>>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>>>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>>>>> skulls. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>>>> >>>>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >>>>> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>>>> >>>>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>>>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >>>>> global warming. >>>>> >>>> >>>> What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have >>>> heard any scientist use. >>> >>> Lots of people use the term. It's amazing that you don't know this. >>> >>> https://www.google.com/search?num=50&rlz=1C1AVNC_enUS605US605&ei=ce71W8-NNYec0gKbzKvQAg&q=%22settled+science%22&oq=%22settled+science%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i7i30j0j0i30l2.3754.4789..6151...0.0..0.76.152.2......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i22i30.IXkVu2xUivM >> >> You back my point here. Look at your own link. Here is the first hit on >> my browser (they can very based on location and other factors) >> >> <https://www.skepticalscience.com/settled-science.htm> >> ----- >> Skeptics often claim that the science of anthropogenic global warming >> (AGW) is not “settled”. But to the extent that this statement is true it >> is trivial, and to the extent that it is important it is false. No >> science is ever “settled”; science deals in probabilities, not >> certainties. When the probability of something approaches 100%, then we >> can regard the science, colloquially, as “settled”. >> ----- >> >> Notice how the site does not really push that phrase at all, but >> responds to those who deny the science and use it. It then explains why >> it could colloquially be called "settled" but does not push that phrase >> in any way. >> >> The fact is science is NEVER "settled", as in "done". Look at the laws >> of motion... they have been superseded in many areas by Relativity, but >> they still work as a model even when we know they are not complete. But >> the science goes on... even with the "settled" part being only an >> approximation. >> >> With that said, I have heard people RESPONDING to those who deny the >> science and use the term "Settled" with the use of the same term. But >> that is not the same as scientists using the term... it simply is not a >> good one. > > As usual, you do not read replies to your message, choosing instead of > lash out in anger. Fair enough. > > As I clearly stated, and your blind rage prevented you from > understanding, is that many PEOPLE use the term "settled science." > > You claim you never heard a SCIENTIST use it. Since you can't prove > that, and you offer no proof, and you are a troll, we have to assume > you are lying again. > > It's just that simple. > >>> Well, it's not really THAT surprising, since you're ignorant on SO >>> many things, and can't understand half of what you read. >> >> Your own link shot you down. :) > > My own link supported EXACTLY what I said. But your trolling behavior > and rage made you think differently. > > As usual, it's a pleasure to school you once again. > > While nowhere NEAR a scientist, your own President Obama claimed it > was settled. > > President Obama tried to move on, echoing something the scientists had > been saying for a long time: > “The debate is settled,” he said, “climate change is a fact.” > http://time.com/4308518/climate-change-settled-science/ So you think Obama is a relevant scientist... interesting. > Obama says scientists are saying it. Are you breaking with him and > calling him a liar? > > Looking forward to your angry, spastic response. > > [chuckle] > As I noted, and you missed, deniers use that term and sometimes others use it to RESPOND to them. It is not a term used in science itself. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 16:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mttbvd19tvdmaalug73ahamfjpc47egg3r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #713860 |
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:21:51 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 11/21/18 5:16 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:58:04 -0700, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 11/21/18 4:49 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:25 -0700, Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>> <...> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>>>>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>>>>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>>>>>> skulls. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LOL >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >>>>>> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>>>>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >>>>>> global warming. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have >>>>> heard any scientist use. >>>> >>>> Lots of people use the term. It's amazing that you don't know this. >>>> >>>> https://www.google.com/search?num=50&rlz=1C1AVNC_enUS605US605&ei=ce71W8-NNYec0gKbzKvQAg&q=%22settled+science%22&oq=%22settled+science%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i7i30j0j0i30l2.3754.4789..6151...0.0..0.76.152.2......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i22i30.IXkVu2xUivM >>> >>> You back my point here. Look at your own link. Here is the first hit on >>> my browser (they can very based on location and other factors) >>> >>> <https://www.skepticalscience.com/settled-science.htm> >>> ----- >>> Skeptics often claim that the science of anthropogenic global warming >>> (AGW) is not “settled”. But to the extent that this statement is true it >>> is trivial, and to the extent that it is important it is false. No >>> science is ever “settled”; science deals in probabilities, not >>> certainties. When the probability of something approaches 100%, then we >>> can regard the science, colloquially, as “settled”. >>> ----- >>> >>> Notice how the site does not really push that phrase at all, but >>> responds to those who deny the science and use it. It then explains why >>> it could colloquially be called "settled" but does not push that phrase >>> in any way. >>> >>> The fact is science is NEVER "settled", as in "done". Look at the laws >>> of motion... they have been superseded in many areas by Relativity, but >>> they still work as a model even when we know they are not complete. But >>> the science goes on... even with the "settled" part being only an >>> approximation. >>> >>> With that said, I have heard people RESPONDING to those who deny the >>> science and use the term "Settled" with the use of the same term. But >>> that is not the same as scientists using the term... it simply is not a >>> good one. >> >> As usual, you do not read replies to your message, choosing instead of >> lash out in anger. Fair enough. >> >> As I clearly stated, and your blind rage prevented you from >> understanding, is that many PEOPLE use the term "settled science." >> >> You claim you never heard a SCIENTIST use it. Since you can't prove >> that, and you offer no proof, and you are a troll, we have to assume >> you are lying again. >> >> It's just that simple. >> >>>> Well, it's not really THAT surprising, since you're ignorant on SO >>>> many things, and can't understand half of what you read. >>> >>> Your own link shot you down. :) >> >> My own link supported EXACTLY what I said. But your trolling behavior >> and rage made you think differently. >> >> As usual, it's a pleasure to school you once again. >> >> While nowhere NEAR a scientist, your own President Obama claimed it >> was settled. >> >> President Obama tried to move on, echoing something the scientists had >> been saying for a long time: >> “The debate is settled,” he said, “climate change is a fact.” >> http://time.com/4308518/climate-change-settled-science/ > >So you think Obama is a relevant scientist... interesting. Wow, let's REPEAT what I had written-- and your hatred for civil rights prevented you from understanding....... >> While nowhere NEAR a scientist, your own President Obama claimed it >> was settled. Now, which part of that was so unclear you not only thought I said Obama was a scientist, but a "relevant" scientist? Or are you just fucking stupid? >> Obama says scientists are saying it. Are you breaking with him and >> calling him a liar? >> >> Looking forward to your angry, spastic response. >> >> [chuckle] >> > >As I noted, and you missed, Wrong. I sis not miss it. >deniers use that term and sometimes others >use it to RESPOND to them. It is not a term used in science itself. So you claim. And as I CLEARLY stated, many people use the term. What the fuck is wrong with your reading comprehension anyway? ROFLMAO
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 01:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pt515f$m5o$175@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #713858 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:16:50 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:58:04 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >>On 11/21/18 4:49 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:25 -0700, Snit >>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> <...> >>>>> >>>>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't exist except in >>>>>>> the warped *carbon tax the hell out of 'em* liberals' thick and >>>>>>> prominent brow-ridged skulls. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>>>> >>>>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and that is >>>>> what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>>>> >>>>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>>>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused global warming. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have >>>> heard any scientist use. >>> >>> Lots of people use the term. It's amazing that you don't know this. >>> >>> https://www.google.com/search? num=50&rlz=1C1AVNC_enUS605US605&ei=ce71W8-NNYec0gKbzKvQAg&q=%22settled +science%22&oq=%22settled+science%22&gs_l=psy- ab.3..0i7i30j0j0i30l2.3754.4789..6151...0.0..0.76.152.2......0....1..gws- wiz.......0i22i30.IXkVu2xUivM >> >>You back my point here. Look at your own link. Here is the first hit on >>my browser (they can very based on location and other factors) >> >><https://www.skepticalscience.com/settled-science.htm> >>----- >>Skeptics often claim that the science of anthropogenic global warming >>(AGW) is not settled. But to the extent that this statement is true it >>is trivial, and to the extent that it is important it is false. No >>science is ever settled; science deals in probabilities, not >>certainties. When the probability of something approaches 100%, then we >>can regard the science, colloquially, as settled. >>----- >> >>Notice how the site does not really push that phrase at all, but >>responds to those who deny the science and use it. It then explains why >>it could colloquially be called "settled" but does not push that phrase >>in any way. >> >>The fact is science is NEVER "settled", as in "done". Look at the laws >>of motion... they have been superseded in many areas by Relativity, but >>they still work as a model even when we know they are not complete. But >>the science goes on... even with the "settled" part being only an >>approximation. >> >>With that said, I have heard people RESPONDING to those who deny the >>science and use the term "Settled" with the use of the same term. But >>that is not the same as scientists using the term... it simply is not a >>good one. > > As usual, you do not read replies to your message, choosing instead of > lash out in anger. Fair enough. > > As I clearly stated, and your blind rage prevented you from > understanding, is that many PEOPLE use the term "settled science." > > You claim you never heard a SCIENTIST use it. Since you can't prove > that, and you offer no proof, and you are a troll, we have to assume you > are lying again. > > It's just that simple. > >>> Well, it's not really THAT surprising, since you're ignorant on SO >>> many things, and can't understand half of what you read. >> >>Your own link shot you down. :) > > My own link supported EXACTLY what I said. But your trolling behavior > and rage made you think differently. > > As usual, it's a pleasure to school you once again. "... and the pig enjoys it". -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 06:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pt64db$13e9$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #713894 |
On 11/21/2018 8:35 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:16:50 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:58:04 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/21/18 4:49 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:25 -0700, Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>> <...> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't exist except in >>>>>>>> the warped *carbon tax the hell out of 'em* liberals' thick and >>>>>>>> prominent brow-ridged skulls. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LOL >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and that is >>>>>> what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>>>>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused global warming. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have >>>>> heard any scientist use. >>>> >>>> Lots of people use the term. It's amazing that you don't know this. >>>> >>>> https://www.google.com/search? > num=50&rlz=1C1AVNC_enUS605US605&ei=ce71W8-NNYec0gKbzKvQAg&q=%22settled > +science%22&oq=%22settled+science%22&gs_l=psy- > ab.3..0i7i30j0j0i30l2.3754.4789..6151...0.0..0.76.152.2......0....1..gws- > wiz.......0i22i30.IXkVu2xUivM >>> >>> You back my point here. Look at your own link. Here is the first hit on >>> my browser (they can very based on location and other factors) >>> >>> <https://www.skepticalscience.com/settled-science.htm> >>> ----- >>> Skeptics often claim that the science of anthropogenic global warming >>> (AGW) is not settled. But to the extent that this statement is true it >>> is trivial, and to the extent that it is important it is false. No >>> science is ever settled; science deals in probabilities, not >>> certainties. When the probability of something approaches 100%, then we >>> can regard the science, colloquially, as settled. >>> ----- >>> >>> Notice how the site does not really push that phrase at all, but >>> responds to those who deny the science and use it. It then explains why >>> it could colloquially be called "settled" but does not push that phrase >>> in any way. >>> >>> The fact is science is NEVER "settled", as in "done". Look at the laws >>> of motion... they have been superseded in many areas by Relativity, but >>> they still work as a model even when we know they are not complete. But >>> the science goes on... even with the "settled" part being only an >>> approximation. >>> >>> With that said, I have heard people RESPONDING to those who deny the >>> science and use the term "Settled" with the use of the same term. But >>> that is not the same as scientists using the term... it simply is not a >>> good one. >> >> As usual, you do not read replies to your message, choosing instead of >> lash out in anger. Fair enough. >> >> As I clearly stated, and your blind rage prevented you from >> understanding, is that many PEOPLE use the term "settled science." >> >> You claim you never heard a SCIENTIST use it. Since you can't prove >> that, and you offer no proof, and you are a troll, we have to assume you >> are lying again. >> >> It's just that simple. >> >>>> Well, it's not really THAT surprising, since you're ignorant on SO >>>> many things, and can't understand half of what you read. >>> >>> Your own link shot you down. :) >> >> My own link supported EXACTLY what I said. But your trolling behavior >> and rage made you think differently. >> >> As usual, it's a pleasure to school you once again. > > "... and the pig enjoys it". > As usual Nads adds nothing to conversation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 06:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pt64t7$13tr$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #713972 |
On 11/22/2018 6:37 AM, benj wrote: > As usual Nads adds nothing to conversation. Does that make you sad? Would you like a nice warm bowl of buckwheat? -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 11:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pt6njj$70p$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #713973 |
On 11/22/2018 5:45 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 11/22/2018 6:37 AM, benj wrote: >> As usual Nads adds nothing to conversation. > > Does that make you sad? Would you like a nice warm bowl of buckwheat? > so, Nads the fat horsie shares her feedbag of buckwheat w bj, on Thanksgiving!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 18:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g8sbvdtfpagt477p8vn19808hnoun6kjha@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #713836 |
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:49:15 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:25 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> <...> >>> >>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>>> skulls. >>>>> >>>>> LOL >>>> >>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>> >>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >>> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>> >>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >>> global warming. >>> >>What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have >>heard any scientist use. > >Lots of people use the term. It's amazing that you don't know this. > >https://www.google.com/search?num=50&rlz=1C1AVNC_enUS605US605&ei=ce71W8-NNYec0gKbzKvQAg&q=%22settled+science%22&oq=%22settled+science%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i7i30j0j0i30l2.3754.4789..6151...0.0..0.76.152.2......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i22i30.IXkVu2xUivM > >Well, it's not really THAT surprising, since you're ignorant on SO >many things, and can't understand half of what you read. Truer words are rarely spoken. Thank you, sir. -- Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 17:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g5m9utFa8okU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #713842 |
On 11/21/18 4:59 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:49:15 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:25 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> <...> >>>> >>>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>>>> skulls. >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL >>>>> >>>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>>> >>>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >>>> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>>> >>>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >>>> global warming. >>>> >>> What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have >>> heard any scientist use. >> >> Lots of people use the term. It's amazing that you don't know this. >> >> https://www.google.com/search?num=50&rlz=1C1AVNC_enUS605US605&ei=ce71W8-NNYec0gKbzKvQAg&q=%22settled+science%22&oq=%22settled+science%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i7i30j0j0i30l2.3754.4789..6151...0.0..0.76.152.2......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i22i30.IXkVu2xUivM >> >> Well, it's not really THAT surprising, since you're ignorant on SO >> many things, and can't understand half of what you read. > > Truer words are rarely spoken. Thank you, sir. > His own link refuted him. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 00:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. |
| Message-ID | <1nyn4hk.1ywbrnd14vib59N%invalid@invalid.invalid> |
| In reply to | #713842 |
Skidmark Gerqory Hall <moot@fake.yacht_mooter> mooted: > Thank you, sir. Sir should be capitalised. (no charge)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 18:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1vrbvdd9klcdkth4osl5f60mr7afjb98va@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #713834 |
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:25 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> <...> >> >>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>> skulls. >>>> >>>> LOL >>> >>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >> >> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >> >> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >> global warming. >> > >What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have >heard any scientist use. Here is the USA the leftists got a group of indoctrinated scientists together who said global warming was settle science because there was a consensus of scientists who believed it. That alone proves these so-called scientists were kooks. There is no such thing as settle science. There is no theory that may not be proven incorrect even if 99 percent of scientists believe it. >As far as man-made global climate change, it is very well established >and accepted. No, it is NOT. It is a bogus belief held by leftist poseurs who base it on proven erroneous manipulated data by whack-job leftist groups. >The fact many conservatives reject it as a part of their >worship of the wealthy does not reduce the quality of the science at all >(at least not directly, it does make it harder to do continued research >and the like). Wealth has nothing to do with it. Conservative has nothing to do with it. Fake science has everything to do with the bogus nature of human-caused global warming for which there exists not a single shred of proof. Wake the fuck up. -- Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 17:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g5ma6fFabarU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #713840 |
On 11/21/18 4:57 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:42:25 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/21/18 4:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:04:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/21/18 3:21 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> <...> >>> >>>>> You moron! Global warming is a hoax. It doesn't >>>>> exist except in the warped *carbon tax the hell >>>>> out of 'em* liberals' thick and prominent brow-ridged >>>>> skulls. >>>>> >>>>> LOL >>>> >>>> So you reject science and the evidence that backs it. Good to know. >>> >>> I do not reject science but I do reject fake science and >>> that is what global warming is - fake science, aka a hoax. >>> >>> There is no scientific evidence and no *settled science* >>> when it comes to human caused or any other caused >>> global warming. >>> >> >> What do you even mean by "settles science"? It is not a term I have >> heard any scientist use. > > Here is the USA the leftists got a group of indoctrinated > scientists together who said global warming was settle science > because there was a consensus of scientists who believed it. When did they say it? In what context? What has been noted is it is very well supported... as are things like germ theory and the laws of motion (though the laws of motion are now known to be approximations but still useful). But you do not hear of ANYONE calling germ theory "settled science". You do hear ANYONE calling most science that. Climate change is called that in response to the deniers of science who use that very poor phrase. > That alone proves these so-called scientists were kooks. > There is no such thing as settle science. There is no theory > that may not be proven incorrect even if 99 percent of > scientists believe it. Who is denying that? We SHOULD keep doing research and learning more. Heck, we are -- hence why in the 70s a small percent of scientists focused on cooling and then that group shrank as people learned more. >> As far as man-made global climate change, it is very well established >> and accepted. > > No, it is NOT. It is a bogus belief held by leftist poseurs > who base it on proven erroneous manipulated data by whack-job > leftist groups. Denial of science promotes your religion of worship of the wealthy, but I am not a part of that religion. >> The fact many conservatives reject it as a part of their >> worship of the wealthy does not reduce the quality of the science at all >> (at least not directly, it does make it harder to do continued research >> and the like). > > Wealth has nothing to do with it. Conservative has nothing to do > with it. Fake science has everything to do with the bogus nature > of human-caused global warming for which there exists not a single > shred of proof. > > Wake the fuck up. See: you claim science is fake. You deny science. That backs what I am noting. I accept the scientific evidence... but I am not one who worships the wealthy. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 00:08 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: UN Says Climate Genocide Is Coming. It's Actually Worse Than That. |
| Message-ID | <1nyn4di.ojs5bo1rywtntN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #713840 |
Skidmark Gerqory Hall <moot@fake.yacht_mooter> mooted: > fuck up Yep. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web