Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #703635 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 45 participants
Thread has 1097 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1097 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:30 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 20:44 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:45 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:26 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:42 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:30 -0400
Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 20:22 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 23:00 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:10 -0500
Re: Today, the Democrats believe that people can commit crimes as long as they vote for them SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:21 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 10:05 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 15:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 08:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 12:57 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-29 15:43 -0700
Double-A, Nov 2008. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 17:06 -0700
Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:34 -0400
Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 19:27 +0000
Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:54 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700
We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
"Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:26 -0700
Did Diogenes ever find his honest man ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:34 -0700
Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:09 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:30 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0500
I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:43 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:34 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:02 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:45 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 08:50 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 14:15 +0000
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 08:23 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-03 10:22 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:28 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:30 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:18 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 14:22 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:39 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 21:58 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:05 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:31 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 20:55 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:08 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0700
Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 21:27 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-10-02 07:59 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:10 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:45 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:25 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:35 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-10-03 18:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:38 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:52 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:26 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 14:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 17:36 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 10:53 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 19:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 12:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:51 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 15:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-04 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:55 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 10:08 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 02:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 12:48 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 09:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 14:19 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 07:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-05 10:36 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 10:43 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:16 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:21 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:27 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 22:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 08:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 02:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:41 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:56 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:58 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:14 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Checkmate" <ricksabian1@qmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:12 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:49 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:59 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 07:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 09:59 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:50 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700
Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:00 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:26 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:53 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:16 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:02 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:04 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:09 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 20:27 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:49 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 04:10 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:14 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:07 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:53 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:57 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:39 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:19 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:09 +0000
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:24 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:48 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:42 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:36 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:46 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
"IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 15:47 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:53 +0000
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:36 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:03 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:05 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:09 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:11 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:29 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:08 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-28 10:07 +0000
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 10:33 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:41 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:23 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:43 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:06 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:07 -0700
No one wants to pay. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-20 19:35 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:49 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 22:18 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 01:56 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-21 03:31 -0700
Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-20 19:14 -0700
Re: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:33 -0400
It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:40 -0700
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 11:10 -0400
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:44 -0400
A good answer ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 09:18 -0700
Re: A good answer ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:34 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 21:15 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:10 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:36 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:31 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 03:18 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:35 -0400
The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 07:07 -0700
Re: The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:46 +0000
You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 21:31 -0700
Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 11:58 -0400
Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:55 +0000
Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 11:33 -0700
Re: Libtard's thievery. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:08 +0000
Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 12:28 -0700
Relf's poverty. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:23 +0000
The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 23:02 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:38 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:31 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 16:06 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 12:10 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 12:46 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:32 +0100
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:37 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:37 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-24 12:04 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 13:29 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 16:47 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:43 -0500
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 00:01 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:49 -0500
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:05 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:24 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:23 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:51 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:38 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:20 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:55 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:02 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:33 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:53 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
2006-2008 were tough years for me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-23 00:20 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:29 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:55 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:29 +0000
What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-23 19:52 -0700
Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:14 +0000
Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:32 -0500
I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-24 09:01 -0700
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 +0000
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-24 16:18 -0400
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:25 -0700
The LessBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-24 15:17 -0700
Re: The LessBad option. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-24 15:34 -0700
Re: The LessBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:43 +0000
"God" has punished Nadegda for this. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 02:47 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 08:05 -0500
I walk everywhere. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:16 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:23 -0400
Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:31 -0700
Re: Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:49 -0400
I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:59 -0700
Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Your theory is full of holes... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:15 -0500
Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:04 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 11:17 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:50 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 09:28 -0500
You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:41 -0700
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:50 -0400
Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 08:02 -0700
Re: Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:43 +0000
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:51 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:35 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:48 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 12:50 -0400
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:52 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:48 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:52 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:14 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 19:01 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 00:51 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:18 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:51 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:58 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:33 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:56 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:59 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:24 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:46 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 11:52 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:48 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:01 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 16:59 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:00 -0700
The GasPump lines. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 17:06 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 17:46 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 22:53 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-25 19:56 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:16 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 10:59 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:12 -0400
Summer of 1979. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-26 02:45 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 21:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 19:35 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:47 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:06 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:10 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-09-26 17:38 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:39 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:01 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:56 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:13 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:07 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 12:22 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:26 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:46 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:51 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:10 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:22 -0400
Kensi prefers science, and is biased. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 05:15 -0700
Re: Kensi prefers science, and is biased. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:43 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 09:11 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 02:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 14:04 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 07:12 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:25 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:36 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:52 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 19:45 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:53 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:19 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 12:38 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 23:46 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:53 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:50 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:06 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 10:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 13:25 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:21 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:00 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:13 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:11 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 19:13 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:48 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:23 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 11:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 14:24 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:15 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:20 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:16 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:20 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 06:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 10:05 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 09:55 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:32 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:10 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:23 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:53 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:23 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:37 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:58 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:05 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:07 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:15 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda - 2018-09-26 14:21 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:27 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:49 -0600
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:30 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 09:21 -0500
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:21 -0500
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 14:31 -0700
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:33 -0700
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:41 -0400
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:14 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:00 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:04 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:50 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:05 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:54 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:38 +0000
"God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:53 -0700
Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:12 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:23 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:28 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:17 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:06 -0500
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-09-29 21:51 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:14 -0700
Steve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 19:16 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:26 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 21:49 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:56 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:19 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:04 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:04 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:33 -0700
An IQ of 185. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 06:41 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:20 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:44 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:23 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:00 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:30 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:33 +0100
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:24 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:37 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:43 -0700
Willful ignorance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:34 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 21:42 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700
Page 2 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 50 Next page →
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <9S4qD.118460$lM2.103829@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #704329 |
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: > benj wrote: > >> chrisv wrote: >>> Skeeter wrote: >>>> kkensington01 >>>>> >>>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for >>>>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the >>>>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >>>> >>>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. >>> >>> Let me guess: You're a stupid right-winger. >> >>Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are put in >>charge of it this time? > > YA stupid right-winger. > >>I think that's called insane. > > Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour of corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the views of conservative individuals? Similarly, are you in favour of corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from doing business? -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <poar78$1bc$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704330 |
On 9/24/2018 7:35 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> benj wrote: >> >>> chrisv wrote: >>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>> kkensington01 >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for >>>>>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the >>>>>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >>>>> >>>>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. >>>> >>>> Let me guess: You're a stupid right-winger. >>> >>> Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are put in >>> charge of it this time? >> >> YA stupid right-winger. >> >>> I think that's called insane. >> >> Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? > > As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour of > corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the > views of conservative individuals? Similarly, are you in favour of > corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from > doing business? > is Alex in the news or entertainment business ? (ask CNN, too) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrnGmayFyKY
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <nqshqdln2rv48tef1a49nc394or3797v8v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #704330 |
SilverSlimer wrote: >I must ask you: are you in favour of >corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the >views of conservative individuals? Similarly, are you in favour of >corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >doing business? Are they being censored? I just googled "Alex Jones", and his Web site came-up at #2, after his Wikipedia entry. I am as anti-censorship as anyone. On the other hand, companies should have the freedom to choose who they do business with. There is a gray area, and a problem, when private companies like Google and Facebook have such dominance in their markets. I'm reminded of the time that you complained that it was "no longer possible" to buy Confederate flags. Of course, it was and is still possible, even if the "name brand" stores chose to stop selling them. Despite the machinations of the Google Corp (or whatever they're calling themselves, these days), we do have a free, uncensored Internet in the US. As I've said before, the real problem is a lack of competition. If there was a "Fox News" version of Google, all would be well. Google, Facebook, Amazon, Paypal... These *all* have an unhealthy amount of power in their markets. -- "Except that this 'equal access' means my work will be of benefit to both myself and potentially also my competitors too...that makes them more competitive with me - - and I'm the one who paid for the work that gave them that leg up." - lying asshole "-hh", attacking the FOSS model
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <g0scenFqeotU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #704343 |
On 9/24/18 7:46 AM, chrisv wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > >> I must ask you: are you in favour of >> corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the >> views of conservative individuals? Similarly, are you in favour of >> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >> doing business? > > Are they being censored? I just googled "Alex Jones", and his Web > site came-up at #2, after his Wikipedia entry. > > I am as anti-censorship as anyone. On the other hand, companies > should have the freedom to choose who they do business with. There is > a gray area, and a problem, when private companies like Google and > Facebook have such dominance in their markets. You see a baker has a right to be bigoted against a gay person and deny them service, but Google and Apple and Twitter do not have a right to refuse to enable someone causing harm. It is a backward and insane world-view... which makes it completely unsurprising that Slimer holds it. > I'm reminded of the time that you complained that it was "no longer > possible" to buy Confederate flags. Of course, it was and is still > possible, even if the "name brand" stores chose to stop selling them. > > Despite the machinations of the Google Corp (or whatever they're > calling themselves, these days), we do have a free, uncensored > Internet in the US. > > As I've said before, the real problem is a lack of competition. If > there was a "Fox News" version of Google, all would be well. > > Google, Facebook, Amazon, Paypal... These *all* have an unhealthy > amount of power in their markets. That I can agree with. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <8ecqD.48720$SG2.14246@fx29.iad> |
| In reply to | #704343 |
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:46:46 -0500, chrisv wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > >>I must ask you: are you in favour of corporations such as Google, Apple, >>Facebook and Twitter censoring the views of conservative individuals? >>Similarly, are you in favour of corporations such as PayPal prohibiting >>people such as Alex Jones from doing business? > > Are they being censored? I just googled "Alex Jones", and his Web site > came-up at #2, after his Wikipedia entry. The Alex Jones Show appears in Podcast form and it has been removed from iTunes, Spotify and others. He has also been removed from Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn (for whatever reason) and other sites for "hate speech." PayPal announced that they wouldn't be allowing him to use their service either, similarly for "hate speech," even though they, like the others, haven't cited what was hateful. Only Twitter bothered to give an explanation and it had to do with the fact that he confronted a CNN reporter who had advocated for his removal from the web. There was no physical altercation, but Alex Jones was visibly upset at the cowardly goblin from CNN. It's hardly a reason to kick him off of Twitter though considering pigs like Sarah Jeong and Peter Fonda actually called for violence against the white race and Barron Trump respectively and suffered no consequences. > I am as anti-censorship as anyone. On the other hand, companies should > have the freedom to choose who they do business with. There is a gray > area, and a problem, when private companies like Google and Facebook > have such dominance in their markets. > > I'm reminded of the time that you complained that it was "no longer > possible" to buy Confederate flags. Of course, it was and is still > possible, even if the "name brand" stores chose to stop selling them. > > Despite the machinations of the Google Corp (or whatever they're calling > themselves, these days), we do have a free, uncensored Internet in the > US. > > As I've said before, the real problem is a lack of competition. If > there was a "Fox News" version of Google, all would be well. There are a number of search engines that respect a person's privacy a lot more than Google does like DuckDuckGo and Startpage. However, Google is the default in many places and takes advantage of its position to break its own engine to filter any result which doesn't fit with its agenda. Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that anything from Infowars is entirely omitted. It's the same with videos from conservatives on Facebook. Even when you look for the exact title of a video, it'll show you results from CNN, Reuters and the New York Times before it shows you Paul Joseph Watson or Mark Dice even though they were the ones who produced a video with that exact title. > Google, Facebook, Amazon, Paypal... These *all* have an unhealthy > amount of power in their markets. Absolutely and no person who advocates for freedom should enable any of them. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <bk88tj.dsv.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #704419 |
On 2018-09-24 1:58 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:46:46 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> SilverSlimer wrote: >> >>> I must ask you: are you in favour of corporations such as Google, Apple, >>> Facebook and Twitter censoring the views of conservative individuals? >>> Similarly, are you in favour of corporations such as PayPal prohibiting >>> people such as Alex Jones from doing business? >> >> Are they being censored? I just googled "Alex Jones", and his Web site >> came-up at #2, after his Wikipedia entry. > > The Alex Jones Show appears in Podcast form and it has been removed from > iTunes, Spotify and others. He has also been removed from Facebook, > Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn (for whatever reason) and other sites for > "hate speech." PayPal announced that they wouldn't be allowing him to use > their service either, similarly for "hate speech," even though they, like > the others, haven't cited what was hateful. > > Only Twitter bothered to give an explanation and it had to do with the > fact that he confronted a CNN reporter who had advocated for his removal > from the web. There was no physical altercation, but Alex Jones was > visibly upset at the cowardly goblin from CNN. It's hardly a reason to > kick him off of Twitter though considering pigs like Sarah Jeong and > Peter Fonda actually called for violence against the white race and > Barron Trump respectively and suffered no consequences. > >> I am as anti-censorship as anyone. On the other hand, companies should >> have the freedom to choose who they do business with. There is a gray >> area, and a problem, when private companies like Google and Facebook >> have such dominance in their markets. >> >> I'm reminded of the time that you complained that it was "no longer >> possible" to buy Confederate flags. Of course, it was and is still >> possible, even if the "name brand" stores chose to stop selling them. >> >> Despite the machinations of the Google Corp (or whatever they're calling >> themselves, these days), we do have a free, uncensored Internet in the >> US. >> >> As I've said before, the real problem is a lack of competition. If >> there was a "Fox News" version of Google, all would be well. > > There are a number of search engines that respect a person's privacy a > lot more than Google does like DuckDuckGo and Startpage. However, Google > is the default in many places and takes advantage of its position to > break its own engine to filter any result which doesn't fit with its > agenda. Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find > him but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that > anything from Infowars is entirely omitted. It's the same with videos > from conservatives on Facebook. Even when you look for the exact title of > a video, it'll show you results from CNN, Reuters and the New York Times > before it shows you Paul Joseph Watson or Mark Dice even though they were > the ones who produced a video with that exact title. > >> Google, Facebook, Amazon, Paypal... These *all* have an unhealthy >> amount of power in their markets. > > Absolutely and no person who advocates for freedom should enable any of > them. > > > you can always smite them
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <g0t3bqFmc8U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #704419 |
On 9/24/18 1:58 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:46:46 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> SilverSlimer wrote: >> >>> I must ask you: are you in favour of corporations such as Google, Apple, >>> Facebook and Twitter censoring the views of conservative individuals? >>> Similarly, are you in favour of corporations such as PayPal prohibiting >>> people such as Alex Jones from doing business? >> >> Are they being censored? I just googled "Alex Jones", and his Web site >> came-up at #2, after his Wikipedia entry. > > The Alex Jones Show appears in Podcast form and it has been removed from > iTunes, Spotify and others. He has also been removed from Facebook, > Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn (for whatever reason) and other sites for > "hate speech." Do you know the specific comments. If you do, and if you think they do not rise to the level of response offered, then MAYBE you have a sincere complaint. If not, well, you do not. > PayPal announced that they wouldn't be allowing him to use > their service either, similarly for "hate speech," even though they, like > the others, haven't cited what was hateful. That is between he and them... but given his common hate speech and bigotry it is not hard to believe. And also, seems you have NO idea what speech this was... so you have no defense. In the case of many of the services they have said their were specific complaints -- and with at least some they only took down the specific ones which included his bigoted rants or hate speech or whatever. If you did 10 seconds of research you could find the reasons why: <https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2018/aug/07/why-infowars-alex-jones-was-banned-apple-facebook-/> Indefensible crap. > Only Twitter bothered to give an explanation and it had to do with the > fact that he confronted a CNN reporter who had advocated for his removal > from the web. There was no physical altercation, but Alex Jones was > visibly upset at the cowardly goblin from CNN. It's hardly a reason to > kick him off of Twitter though considering pigs like Sarah Jeong and > Peter Fonda actually called for violence against the white race and > Barron Trump respectively and suffered no consequences. By all means show the evidence. >> I am as anti-censorship as anyone. On the other hand, companies should >> have the freedom to choose who they do business with. There is a gray >> area, and a problem, when private companies like Google and Facebook >> have such dominance in their markets. >> >> I'm reminded of the time that you complained that it was "no longer >> possible" to buy Confederate flags. Of course, it was and is still >> possible, even if the "name brand" stores chose to stop selling them. >> >> Despite the machinations of the Google Corp (or whatever they're calling >> themselves, these days), we do have a free, uncensored Internet in the >> US. >> >> As I've said before, the real problem is a lack of competition. If >> there was a "Fox News" version of Google, all would be well. > > There are a number of search engines that respect a person's privacy a > lot more than Google does like DuckDuckGo and Startpage. However, Google > is the default in many places and takes advantage of its position to > break its own engine to filter any result which doesn't fit with its > agenda. What "agenda"? > Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find > him but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that > anything from Infowars is entirely omitted. Why would Alex Jones show up high on a Clinton search? > It's the same with videos > from conservatives on Facebook. Even when you look for the exact title of > a video, it'll show you results from CNN, Reuters and the New York Times > before it shows you Paul Joseph Watson or Mark Dice even though they were > the ones who produced a video with that exact title. Examples? And what do they base the search ranking on? >> Google, Facebook, Amazon, Paypal... These *all* have an unhealthy >> amount of power in their markets. > > Absolutely and no person who advocates for freedom should enable any of > them. They are too powerful... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <1nvnnfl.jehk51tualt9N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #704419 |
SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:46:46 -0500, chrisv wrote: > > > SilverSlimer wrote: > > > >>I must ask you: are you in favour of corporations such as Google, Apple, > >>Facebook and Twitter censoring the views of conservative individuals? > >>Similarly, are you in favour of corporations such as PayPal prohibiting > >>people such as Alex Jones from doing business? > > > > Are they being censored? I just googled "Alex Jones", and his Web site > > came-up at #2, after his Wikipedia entry. > > The Alex Jones Show appears in Podcast form and it has been removed from > iTunes, Spotify and others. He has also been removed from Facebook, > Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn (for whatever reason) and other sites for > "hate speech." PayPal announced that they wouldn't be allowing him to use > their service either, similarly for "hate speech," even though they, like > the others, haven't cited what was hateful. > > Only Twitter bothered to give an explanation and it had to do with the > fact that he confronted a CNN reporter who had advocated for his removal > from the web. There was no physical altercation, but Alex Jones was > visibly upset at the cowardly goblin from CNN. It's hardly a reason to > kick him off of Twitter though considering pigs like Sarah Jeong and > Peter Fonda actually called for violence against the white race and > Barron Trump respectively and suffered no consequences. > > > I am as anti-censorship as anyone. On the other hand, companies should > > have the freedom to choose who they do business with. There is a gray > > area, and a problem, when private companies like Google and Facebook > > have such dominance in their markets. > > > > I'm reminded of the time that you complained that it was "no longer > > possible" to buy Confederate flags. Of course, it was and is still > > possible, even if the "name brand" stores chose to stop selling them. > > > > Despite the machinations of the Google Corp (or whatever they're calling > > themselves, these days), we do have a free, uncensored Internet in the > > US. > > > > As I've said before, the real problem is a lack of competition. If > > there was a "Fox News" version of Google, all would be well. > > There are a number of search engines that respect a person's privacy a > lot more than Google does like DuckDuckGo and Startpage. However, Google > is the default in many places and takes advantage of its position to > break its own engine to filter any result which doesn't fit with its > agenda. Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find > him but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that > anything from Infowars is entirely omitted. It's the same with videos > from conservatives on Facebook. Even when you look for the exact title of > a video, it'll show you results from CNN, Reuters and the New York Times > before it shows you Paul Joseph Watson or Mark Dice even though they were > the ones who produced a video with that exact title. > > > Google, Facebook, Amazon, Paypal... These *all* have an unhealthy > > amount of power in their markets. > > Absolutely and no person who advocates for freedom should enable any of > them. Someone should tell them about Usenet. As John Gilmour said:- "The Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it." -- ^Ã^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <pod5ij$dmj$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704419 |
SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find > him but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that > anything from Infowars is entirely omitted. Why offer low-quality links on the very first page?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <o68kqdld9ncknkdcoh2u0fr2el1lkvj560@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #704490 |
Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: >> >> Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find >> him but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that >> anything from Infowars is entirely omitted. > > Why offer low-quality links on the very first page? Exactly. It would be like searching for "Linux advocacy" and getting links to posts from the "true Linux advocate". -- "Linux simply isn't mature enough and rich enough for the average home user ..." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <MltqD.127506$oM2.50220@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #704492 |
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:57 -0500, chrisv wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> SilverSlimer wrote: >>> >>> Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him >>> but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that >>> anything from Infowars is entirely omitted. >> >> Why offer low-quality links on the very first page? > > Exactly. It would be like searching for "Linux advocacy" and getting > links to posts from the "true Linux advocate". Alright, but who determines what is quality and what isn't? Shouldn't an algorithm, in its ultimate objectivity, not be able to determine between what's "credible" and what isn't? Why is left-wing media always considered to be a "quality" source despite its decades of lying and membership in Operation Mockingbird? -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <s6umqd9eq6gsna31ek4cqanghb93i5blfk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #704536 |
SilverSlimer wrote: >who determines what is quality and what isn't? Why, whoever has the most money, of course! >Shouldn't an >algorithm, in its ultimate objectivity, not be able to determine between >what's "credible" and what isn't? I doubt that's possible. >Why is left-wing media always >considered to be a "quality" source despite its decades of lying and >membership in Operation Mockingbird? I think that the right-wing gets its way, plenty of the time. I do agree that the mainstream media is biased to the left, toward "the little people". One could argue that it should be, considering that the world is mostly owned and operated by the wealthy elite. -- "Gosh, that's an interesting set of expectations when you try to make mere survival to be synonymous with success." - lying asshole "-hh"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <mpLqD.97149$8r2.92419@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #704647 |
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 07:28:41 -0500, chrisv wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > >>who determines what is quality and what isn't? > > Why, whoever has the most money, of course! Which is ridiculous. Google and Apple clearly have the most money but they should have no say over how the news is reported and what bias is acceptable or not. >>Shouldn't an algorithm, in its ultimate objectivity, not be able to >>determine between what's "credible" and what isn't? > > I doubt that's possible. Other search engines do it successfully. An algorithm for search should strive for accuracy. As such, a rudimentary search for "Alex Jones Infowars Hillary Clinton" should produce articles from Infowars on Hillary Clinton possibly written by Alex Jones rather than a report on Alex Jones from CNN by Anderson Cooper. Google and Youtube have purposely been broken to eliminate him from the results. >>Why is left-wing media always considered to be a "quality" source >>despite its decades of lying and membership in Operation Mockingbird? > > I think that the right-wing gets its way, plenty of the time. That must be why Kavanaugh is not yet approved. His nomination has been stopped in its tracks because doctor, who according to her yearbooks was a seriously deranged slut in high school, claims that he attempted to rape her but can't get the details about the event correct and consistently contradicts her own story. > I do agree that the mainstream media is biased to the left, toward "the > little people". One could argue that it should be, considering that the > world is mostly owned and operated by the wealthy elite. I don't consider Hillary Clinton who made billions through a fake charity called the Clinton Foundation to be part of the "little people." The Democrats are little more than politicians who have used their position to gain wealth. Look at Maxine Waters, for instance. Despite being nothing more than a politician in a fairly poor district that she doesn't even live in, her net worth is way higher than it ever could have been. This is pretty much the same for any Democrat who eventually rises to power. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <6q1nqd98j6u5o4ig7h7696r9fqh63m07em@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #704652 |
SilverSlimer wrote: >Which is ridiculous. I was being facetious, but, unfortunately, it's not far from the truth >Google and Youtube have purposely >been broken to eliminate him from the results. He's a known liar. Maybe he should claim crap like "Sandy Hook was a hoax." >That must be why Kavanaugh is not yet approved. A cherry-picked example, and he may still be approved. Also, remember when the right-wingers would not even consider Obama's choice, because Obama had "only one year remaining"? >I don't consider Hillary Clinton (...) to be part of the "little people." She's not the only person they support. You cherry-pick a lot. >The Democrats are little more than politicians who >have used their position to gain wealth. The Republicans are no better. -- "having market share doesn't do any good if it doesn't result in commensurate net profits." - lying asshole "-hh"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <q84nqdpgf2qid5ve8aaq5gj3ias0oui74o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #704655 |
chrisv wrote: >>I don't consider Hillary Clinton (...) to be part of the "little people." > >She's not the only person they support. Oh, and as the democrat, she was perceived as more of an advocate of the "little people" than the republican. So, yeah, she'll get the support, despite her flaws. Right-wingers do the same thing, of course. We all know that even Democrats who are US Senators, etc, are part of the wealthy elite. The wealthy elite runs this country. -- 'Calling Android "Linux" is a big fat lie' - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <MOPqD.180432$4S3.2542@fx47.iad> |
| In reply to | #704655 |
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:28:01 -0500, chrisv wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > >>Which is ridiculous. > > I was being facetious, but, unfortunately, it's not far from the truth > >>Google and Youtube have purposely been broken to eliminate him from the >>results. > > He's a known liar. Maybe he should claim crap like "Sandy Hook was a > hoax." I actually watched the guy regularly when he supposedly said what leftists claim that he did. He questioned whether Sandy Hook was a false flag and did so on a number of days in a row, but he didn't say that children didn't die. >>That must be why Kavanaugh is not yet approved. > > A cherry-picked example, and he may still be approved. > > Also, remember when the right-wingers would not even consider Obama's > choice, because Obama had "only one year remaining"? Did they find people to claim that Obama's selection was guilty of sexual assault, all without any kind of believable testimony or evidence? >>I don't consider Hillary Clinton (...) to be part of the "little >>people." > > She's not the only person they support. You cherry-pick a lot. Feel free to give examples of Democrats you consider to be honourable. >>The Democrats are little more than politicians who have used their >>position to gain wealth. > > The Republicans are no better. To be honest, Democrats and Republicans are _both_ trash in the United States. I feel bad that you guys get to choose from two packs of morons to lead your country when the reality is that one side is a pack of con men (the Democrats) and the other is a pack of cowards (Republicans). Donald Trump, an arrogant billionaire, is your only hope and it's shocking that such a person would be multiple times better than every politician on the map at the moment. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <pog8of$1d72$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704652 |
On 9/26/2018 9:00 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > That must be why Kavanaugh is not yet approved. His nomination has been > stopped in its tracks because doctor, who according to her yearbooks was > a seriously deranged slut in high school, What and how much sex she had consensually DOES NOT MATTER ONE IOTA here: only whether she consented to sexual contact with Kavanaugh on that particular night, which she did not. >> I do agree that the mainstream media is biased to the left, toward "the >> little people". One could argue that it should be, considering that the >> world is mostly owned and operated by the wealthy elite. > > I don't consider Hillary Clinton who made billions through a fake charity > called the Clinton Foundation to be part of the "little people." The > Democrats are little more than politicians who have used their position > to gain wealth. Look at Maxine Waters, for instance. Despite being > nothing more than a politician in a fairly poor district that she doesn't > even live in, her net worth is way higher than it ever could have been. > This is pretty much the same for any Democrat who eventually rises to > power. The part you are leaving out being that your side is *much, much worse* -- look at the Koch Bros., for example. Or any current Cabinet member. Or that shambling orange hulk sitting behind the Resolute Desk where there would normally be a President instead. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <pog8jc$1d72$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704647 |
On 9/26/2018 8:28 AM, chrisv wrote: > I do agree that the mainstream media is biased to the left, toward > "the little people". One could argue that it should be, considering > that the world is mostly owned and operated by the wealthy elite. Are you effin' kidding me? If the mainstream media was *balanced*, let alone biased to the *left*, you'd hear a whole lot about housing affordability and universal healthcare and how (not whether) to reform the real estate and health care sectors. But no. The MSM are, by and large, firmly in support of maintaining the status quo, in which the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor. That's a center-right position. Fox and its ilk are far right, in favor of turning back the clock to before Civil Rights and before Roe v. Wade, so they are to the right of the MSM, but that doesn't make the MSM left any more than syphilis being worse than the common cold makes the common cold good. An actually centrist position would be something like "bring back FDR's New Deal, with antitrust, bolstered welfare programs, and more public housing". An actually center-left position would be something like "how do we transition peacefully and gradually away from capitalism and toward some more egalitarian system" and an actually far left position would be "after we win the war, what should we do to these capitalist pigs and their enablers in Congress, line them up against a wall and have them all shot or something more inventively cruel?" -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <g0uuffFc26sU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #704490 |
On 9/25/18 3:58 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find >> him but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that >> anything from Infowars is entirely omitted. > > Why offer low-quality links on the very first page? > Slimer wants special entitlements for Jones. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <WgtqD.127505$oM2.62673@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #704490 |
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him but >> look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that anything >> from Infowars is entirely omitted. > > Why offer low-quality links on the very first page? Considering how often the mainstream media lies, I'm not sure why anyone would consider them to be of high quality. Compared to things like The New York Times and The Washington Post, Infowars is pretty damned accurate. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web