Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #702932 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 261 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-16 10:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:24 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:51 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:55 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 11:09 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 10:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 13:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:57 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 14:27 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:41 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 11:48 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 19:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:50 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 23:55 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-18 17:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 21:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 11:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 11:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:03 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 13:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 16:05 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:46 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 22:21 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:07 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 10:33 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 17:59 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 16:41 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:47 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:11 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:48 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:47 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:36 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:06 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-25 10:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 16:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:20 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:58 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:04 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:42 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-21 20:51 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:21 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 10:19 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 11:45 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:11 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 20:44 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 17:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:04 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-20 18:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 16:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-20 22:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 09:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 17:59 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 23:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 00:02 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 17:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 05:08 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:51 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:43 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:06 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 16:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 20:32 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 09:27 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:58 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:03 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:50 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 14:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:47 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:01 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:33 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 00:24 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 01:17 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:05 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:07 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:56 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:50 -0400
Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:40 -0400
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:04 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:03 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:38 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:58 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 21:14 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:08 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 17:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:50 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:37 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:43 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:42 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:31 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:18 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 18:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:05 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-20 18:17 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:05 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:52 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:46 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:12 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 19:39 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:09 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:15 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 14:38 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-09-18 15:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 00:00 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 06:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 10:13 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 11:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:34 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:40 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 06:10 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:29 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:40 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 10:13 -0500
Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:14 -0700
Re: Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:25 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 12:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:05 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:25 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:36 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-16 23:24 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:25 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 08:13 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 09:15 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:43 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:54 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:59 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:35 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 01:36 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 11:39 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 13:53 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 15:00 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 15:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-09-18 01:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400
Page 12 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 05:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <012h7f-11o.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #704024 |
In sci.physics Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:34:11 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>>>>> reasonable measure. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- >>> illinois-90008/ >>>>>> >>>>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link >>>>>> before you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >>>>> >>>>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to >>>>> do with recharging mining equipment? >>>>> >>>>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >>>>> it is going diesel electric like trains. >>>> >>>> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, >>>> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only >>>> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. >>>> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles >>>> are diesel vehicles. >>> >>> Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the diesel >>> tank and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there and >>> replaced with a battery and bam, it's electric. >>> >>> Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. >> >> How about never absent a blinding new advancement in battery >> techonology? > > Perhaps you were not paying attention when kensi posted a link to an > article about the Purdue University scientists who just MADE that blinding > new advancement? She only posted it about three times. Yawn. > Here it is again: > > https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable- > battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html Arm waving speculation and NOT a blinding advancement in battery tech. No mention of energy density. No mention of operational life time. No mention of cost. No mention of required infrastructure much less an estimated cost. <snip remaining babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 11:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po5lvb$1se6$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704088 |
On 9/22/2018 1:54 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote: >> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable- >> battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html > > Arm waving speculation and NOT a blinding advancement in battery tech. > > No mention of energy density. Find the journal papers. > No mention of operational life time. They have to run the prototype for a while to know what that's going to be. > No mention of cost. Probably quite high because it's a prototype. Mass-manufactured ones with an optimized design derived from experience and experiments with the prototype will be much less expensive, of course. > No mention of required infrastructure much less an estimated cost. Infrastructure *was* mentioned, and after that you've begun looping like a stuck record. <snip remaining babble> -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-23 11:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9664EBF4737Cgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223> |
| In reply to | #704088 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in news:012h7f-11o.ln1@mail.specsol.com: > In sci.physics Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:34:11 +0000, jimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is >>>>>>>>> eventually? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>>>>>> reasonable measure. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- >>>> illinois-90008/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link >>>>>>> before you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >>>>>> >>>>>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing >>>>>> to do with recharging mining equipment? >>>>>> >>>>>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >>>>>> it is going diesel electric like trains. >>>>> >>>>> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, >>>>> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only >>>>> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. >>>>> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those >>>>> vehicles are diesel vehicles. >>>> >>>> Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the >>>> diesel tank and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there >>>> and replaced with a battery and bam, it's electric. >>>> >>>> Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. >>> >>> How about never absent a blinding new advancement in battery >>> techonology? >> >> Perhaps you were not paying attention when kensi posted a link to an >> article about the Purdue University scientists who just MADE that >> blinding new advancement? She only posted it about three times. > > Yawn. > >> Here it is again: >> >> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeabl >> e- >> battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.htm >> l > > Arm waving speculation and NOT a blinding advancement in battery tech. > > No mention of energy density. > > No mention of operational life time. > > No mention of cost. > > No mention of required infrastructure much less an estimated cost. > > <snip remaining babble> > Or how to generate the electricity to recharge the battery.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 13:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pobb3o$v9e$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704217 |
On 9/23/2018 6:44 AM, Avenging Angel wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in news:012h7f-11o.ln1@mail.specsol.com: > >> In sci.physics Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote: >>> On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:34:11 +0000, jimp wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is >>>>>>>>>> eventually? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>>>>>>> reasonable measure. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- >>>>> illinois-90008/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link >>>>>>>> before you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing >>>>>>> to do with recharging mining equipment? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >>>>>>> it is going diesel electric like trains. >>>>>> >>>>>> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, >>>>>> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only >>>>>> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. >>>>>> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those >>>>>> vehicles are diesel vehicles. >>>>> >>>>> Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the >>>>> diesel tank and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there >>>>> and replaced with a battery and bam, it's electric. >>>>> >>>>> Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. >>>> >>>> How about never absent a blinding new advancement in battery >>>> techonology? >>> >>> Perhaps you were not paying attention when kensi posted a link to an >>> article about the Purdue University scientists who just MADE that >>> blinding new advancement? She only posted it about three times. >> >> Yawn. >> >>> Here it is again: >>> >>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeabl >>> e- >>> battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.htm >>> l >> >> Arm waving speculation and NOT a blinding advancement in battery tech. >> >> No mention of energy density. >> >> No mention of operational life time. >> >> No mention of cost. >> >> No mention of required infrastructure much less an estimated cost. >> >> <snip remaining babble> >> > > Or how to generate the electricity to recharge the battery. > just going back to gasoline would save all that battory electrolite replacement cost. Bet that is a $1000 task at a dealership.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 23:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pof4ih$mn1$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704217 |
"Avenging Angel" <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> wrote in message news:XnsA9664EBF4737Cgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223... > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in news:012h7f-11o.ln1@mail.specsol.com: > >> In sci.physics Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote: >>> On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:34:11 +0000, jimp wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is >>>>>>>>>> eventually? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>>>>>>> reasonable measure. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- >>>>> illinois-90008/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link >>>>>>>> before you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing >>>>>>> to do with recharging mining equipment? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >>>>>>> it is going diesel electric like trains. >>>>>> >>>>>> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, >>>>>> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only >>>>>> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. >>>>>> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those >>>>>> vehicles are diesel vehicles. >>>>> >>>>> Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the >>>>> diesel tank and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there >>>>> and replaced with a battery and bam, it's electric. >>>>> >>>>> Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. >>>> >>>> How about never absent a blinding new advancement in battery >>>> techonology? >>> >>> Perhaps you were not paying attention when kensi posted a link to an >>> article about the Purdue University scientists who just MADE that >>> blinding new advancement? She only posted it about three times. >> >> Yawn. >> >>> Here it is again: >>> >>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeabl >>> e- >>> battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.htm >>> l >> >> Arm waving speculation and NOT a blinding advancement in battery tech. >> >> No mention of energy density. >> >> No mention of operational life time. >> >> No mention of cost. >> >> No mention of required infrastructure much less an estimated cost. >> >> <snip remaining babble> >> > > Or how to generate the electricity to recharge the battery. No problem, we will use Coal, Natural Gas, and Oil fired power plants. After all, as long as we locate them somewhere they can't be seen, then consumers can be sold on the idea that the power they are buying is green.....just as they do with solar panels and Electric cars. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 10:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <po5m66$1tju$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704024 |
On 9/21/2018 10:40 PM, Libtard wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:34:11 +0000, jimp wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad...
>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Solar?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a
>>>>>>> reasonable measure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle-
>>> illinois-90008/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link
>>>>>> before you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline?
>>>>>
>>>>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to
>>>>> do with recharging mining equipment?
>>>>>
>>>>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric;
>>>>> it is going diesel electric like trains.
>>>>
>>>> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel,
>>>> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only
>>>> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels.
>>>> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles
>>>> are diesel vehicles.
>>>
>>> Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the diesel
>>> tank and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there and
>>> replaced with a battery and bam, it's electric.
>>>
>>> Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops.
>>
>> How about never absent a blinding new advancement in battery
>> techonology?
>
> Perhaps you were not paying attention when kensi posted a link to an
> article about the Purdue University scientists who just MADE that blinding
> new advancement? She only posted it about three times.
>
> Here it is again:
>
> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-
> battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html
>
> Think maybe you might be able to actually retain some information from it
> if you read it a fourth time? Or, at the VERY least, learn how to
> correctly spell the word "technology"?
>
LIBTARD !! YOU'RE BACK !! WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN ?
WE MISS YOU !!
(WTF are you backing poor kensi pupa for ? 'she' has gone over to the
dark uninformed side, if 'she' had read that article in that link, she
would realize there is nothing real there, only future smoke and
mirrors, and only a dude asking for funding. I think kensi pupa may have
frontal lobe impairment, I hope not, 'she' may grow out of it. )
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Fusion, solar, and the graviton. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.22--2.14am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #704015 |
For many decades now, fusion, solar, and the graviton, have been "right around the corner".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fusion, solar, and the graviton. |
| Message-ID | <g0nnf5Fs24oU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #704065 |
On 9/22/18 2:14 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > For many decades now, fusion, solar, and the graviton, > have been "right around the corner". > Solar is here, now. Heck, in many places fossil fuels are largely out. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 23:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po4l7b$79j$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704000 |
"Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message news:po47i5$d3v$9@dont-email.me... > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: > >> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>> >>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>>> >>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>>> reasonable measure. >>>> >>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- > illinois-90008/ >>>> >>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link before >>>> you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >>> >>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to do >>> with recharging mining equipment? >>> >>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >>> it is going diesel electric like trains. >> >> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, >> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only >> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. >> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles >> are diesel vehicles. > > Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the diesel tank > and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there and replaced with > a battery and bam, it's electric. > > Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. Nothing even in the labs yet that could accomplish that, much less making into main stream commercial use within that time frame. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 00:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360f93f3f9728bda994b7f@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #704000 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <po47i5$d3v$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: > > > On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message > >>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... > >>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>>> Solar? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment > >>>>>> > >>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. > >>>>> > >>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? > >>>> > >>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a > >>>> reasonable measure. > >>> > >>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- > illinois-90008/ > >>> > >>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link before > >>> you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? > >> > >> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to do > >> with recharging mining equipment? > >> > >> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; > >> it is going diesel electric like trains. > > > > That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, > > that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only > > bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. > > To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles > > are diesel vehicles. > > Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the diesel tank > and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there and replaced with > a battery and bam, it's electric. > > Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. I'm dying to know what you're basing your 10-15 year prediction on. Are you using the latest crystal ball technology? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 12:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po5rdn$6nv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704056 |
On 9/22/2018 3:49 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <po47i5$d3v$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >> >>> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>>>> >>>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>>>> reasonable measure. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- >> illinois-90008/ >>>>> >>>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link before >>>>> you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >>>> >>>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to do >>>> with recharging mining equipment? >>>> >>>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >>>> it is going diesel electric like trains. >>> >>> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, >>> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only >>> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. >>> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles >>> are diesel vehicles. >> >> Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the diesel tank >> and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there and replaced with >> a battery and bam, it's electric. >> >> Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. > > I'm dying to know what you're basing your 10-15 year prediction on. Are > you using the latest crystal ball technology? Well, they got them battery powered locomotives in foreign countries what run diesel electric or overhead electric out on the main line but shut off the diesel or disconnect from the catenary and run on battery in the urban areas, power gaps and in tunnels. Or sometimes switch people and cargo to battery trams and buses. But that's all foreign stuff. Americans don't like foreign stuff. Especially trains. Trains limit your freedoms. https://rail.bombardier.com/en.html <= foreign electric train company website -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 23:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pof4ih$mn1$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704108 |
"mixed nuts" <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote in message news:po5rdn$6nv$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 9/22/2018 3:49 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <po47i5$d3v$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >>> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>>>>> reasonable measure. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- >>> illinois-90008/ >>>>>> >>>>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link >>>>>> before >>>>>> you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >>>>> >>>>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to >>>>> do >>>>> with recharging mining equipment? >>>>> >>>>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >>>>> it is going diesel electric like trains. >>>> >>>> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, >>>> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only >>>> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. >>>> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles >>>> are diesel vehicles. >>> >>> Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the diesel >>> tank >>> and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there and replaced >>> with >>> a battery and bam, it's electric. >>> >>> Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. >> >> I'm dying to know what you're basing your 10-15 year prediction on. Are >> you using the latest crystal ball technology? > > Well, they got them battery powered locomotives in foreign countries what > run diesel electric or overhead electric out on the main line but shut off > the diesel or disconnect from the catenary and run on battery in the urban > areas, power gaps and in tunnels. Or sometimes switch people and cargo to > battery trams and buses. But that's all foreign stuff. Americans don't > like foreign stuff. Especially trains. Trains limit your freedoms. > > https://rail.bombardier.com/en.html <= foreign electric train company > website Actually, they have ONE prototype in service, and let's look at the current and projected specs. "The train that ran on the weekend can go about 40 km (25 miles) on a charge, but future version will be able to run for up to 100 km (62 miles). " https://www.engadget.com/2018/09/17/bombardier-battery-powered-electric-train/ Yea, Let's have a train that can run 62 miles before it can't go anymore, and then would have to run on electric for several hours in order to allow the batteries to recharge. In short it's good only for relatively short hops between electrified rail networks. Then, it would almost certainly be far cheaper to close those gaps than it would be to have a battery run engine. So, I would put it down as a curiosity at this point, and I doubt it will ever become a prevalent form of motive power anytime in the next couple of decades. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 23:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po4l7a$79j$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703812 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:po2pq0$1at4$5@gioia.aioe.org... > On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> Solar? >>>>> >>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>> >>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>> >>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>> >>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>> >>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >> >> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a reasonable >> measure. > > https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle-illinois-90008/ 15,000 out of 4.5 Million = 0.3% Excuse me, if I don't see that as anything other than a fad at this moment in time. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-20 23:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po29to$b89$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703301 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:pnqi5q$1q0b$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >> Solar? >> >> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, > > No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. Sounds good until you remember that, at best, with current technology panels are energy neutral. Which does nothing to actually help you replace your energy sources, much end the impact of the mining operations on the environment. > >> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment > > For now but eventually these should be electric. Sounds nice, but it will be a LONG time before that happens. >Maybe Tesla brand. Or > we can produce fuel synthetically. The north edge of the Sahara has tons > of energy from sunlight and tons of saline water readily available from > the Mediterranean just to the north. Using the energy, some of the water > can be split to produce hydrogen and more can be desalinated to green > nearby parts of the desert. The hydrogen can be reacted with other > substances to produce easier to handle fuels, such as natural gas and > propane or even synthetic diesel. Sure, and then one sandstorm, wipes out your solar farm, and passing nomads rip out the wiring, and make off with the panels to sell for a few bucks in a market somewhere. > >> Wind? >> >> Need power and coal to produce the steel, > > Power and iron, you mean. No, coal. You need coal to make steel. Otherwise all you get it iron. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 09:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po2qaa$1ca1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703779 |
On 9/20/2018 11:42 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:pnqi5q$1q0b$1@gioia.aioe.org... >> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>> Solar? >>> >>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >> >> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. > > Sounds good until you remember that, at best, with current technology > panels are energy neutral<SPANK> https://cleantechnica.com/2018/02/03/solar-power-can-pay-easily/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_returned_on_energy_invested Fthenakis V., PV Energy ROI Tracks Efficiency Gains, Solar Today, American Solar Energy Society, 26(4), 24-26, 2012 http://www.clca.columbia.edu/7B_SolarToday%20June12_c.pdf 60. That's a higher EROI than almost any contemporary source except hydroelectric. Meanwhile that of tar sands oil is what, 3 or so? SPNAK! >> For now but eventually these should be electric. > > Sounds nice, but it will be a LONG time before that happens. *sigh* https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle-illinois-90008/ ... > Sure, and then one sandstorm, wipes out your solar farm, and passing > nomads rip out the wiring, and make off with the panels to sell for a > few bucks in a market somewhere. So it won't stay working in the event of a "Mad Max" post-apocalyptic scenario. Neither will fossil fuels, since the motorbike-riding warlord gangs will keep siphoning gas out of your tank and stealing stuff in that case as well. >>> Need power and coal to produce the steel, >> >> Power and iron, you mean. > > No, coal. You need coal to make steel. Otherwise all you get it iron. You need *carbon* to make steel. It doesn't have to come from coal, let alone from *burning* that awful dirty stuff. > --- Wrong, should be newline-dash-dash-space-newline, not newline-dash-dash-dash-newline. > This email<MUSHROOM CLOUD!> Wrong, it's a Usenet post, but thanks for playing. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0lpf7f-vvi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703813 |
In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > On 9/20/2018 11:42 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:pnqi5q$1q0b$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> Solar? >>>> >>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>> >>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >> >> Sounds good until you remember that, at best, with current technology >> panels are energy neutral<SPANK> > > https://cleantechnica.com/2018/02/03/solar-power-can-pay-easily/ > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_returned_on_energy_invested > > Fthenakis V., PV Energy ROI Tracks Efficiency Gains, Solar Today, > American Solar Energy Society, 26(4), 24-26, 2012 > > http://www.clca.columbia.edu/7B_SolarToday%20June12_c.pdf > > 60. That's a higher EROI than almost any contemporary source except > hydroelectric. Meanwhile that of tar sands oil is what, 3 or so? What has this to do with mining equipment? > > SPNAK! > >>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >> >> Sounds nice, but it will be a LONG time before that happens. > > *sigh* > > https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle-illinois-90008/ Yet again, nothing to do with mining equipment. > ... > >> Sure, and then one sandstorm, wipes out your solar farm, and passing >> nomads rip out the wiring, and make off with the panels to sell for a >> few bucks in a market somewhere. > > So it won't stay working in the event of a "Mad Max" post-apocalyptic > scenario. Neither will fossil fuels, since the motorbike-riding warlord > gangs will keep siphoning gas out of your tank and stealing stuff in > that case as well. Nope, not a "post-apocalyptic scenario" a typical scenario in most third world locations where the mines are. <snip remaining screed> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <po47p1$d3v$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703864 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:25:04 +0000, jimp wrote: > In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 9/20/2018 11:42 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:pnqi5q$1q0b$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> Solar? >>>>> >>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>> >>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>> >>> Sounds good until you remember that, at best, with current technology >>> panels are energy neutral<SPANK> >> >> https://cleantechnica.com/2018/02/03/solar-power-can-pay-easily/ >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_returned_on_energy_invested >> >> Fthenakis V., PV Energy ROI Tracks Efficiency Gains, Solar Today, >> American Solar Energy Society, 26(4), 24-26, 2012 >> >> http://www.clca.columbia.edu/7B_SolarToday%20June12_c.pdf >> >> 60. That's a higher EROI than almost any contemporary source except >> hydroelectric. Meanwhile that of tar sands oil is what, 3 or so? > > What has this to do with mining equipment? Why are you asking kensi? Scout's the one who sent this branch off on a tangent. >>> Sure, and then one sandstorm, wipes out your solar farm, and passing >>> nomads rip out the wiring, and make off with the panels to sell for a >>> few bucks in a market somewhere. >> >> So it won't stay working in the event of a "Mad Max" post-apocalyptic >> scenario. Neither will fossil fuels, since the motorbike-riding warlord >> gangs will keep siphoning gas out of your tank and stealing stuff in >> that case as well. > > Nope, not a "post-apocalyptic scenario" a typical scenario in most third > world locations where the mines are. Asking renewable energy engineers to solve social problems is obviously stupid, which is probably why you would do that. That being said: maybe if we genuinely *invested* in the countries that had resources we wanted, instead of subjugating and exploiting them and *calling* that "investment", we wouldn't have these problems? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4fmg7f-bkm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #704004 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:25:04 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 9/20/2018 11:42 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:pnqi5q$1q0b$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> Solar? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>> >>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>> >>>> Sounds good until you remember that, at best, with current technology >>>> panels are energy neutral<SPANK> >>> >>> https://cleantechnica.com/2018/02/03/solar-power-can-pay-easily/ >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_returned_on_energy_invested >>> >>> Fthenakis V., PV Energy ROI Tracks Efficiency Gains, Solar Today, >>> American Solar Energy Society, 26(4), 24-26, 2012 >>> >>> http://www.clca.columbia.edu/7B_SolarToday%20June12_c.pdf >>> >>> 60. That's a higher EROI than almost any contemporary source except >>> hydroelectric. Meanwhile that of tar sands oil is what, 3 or so? >> >> What has this to do with mining equipment? > > Why are you asking kensi? Scout's the one who sent this branch off on a > tangent. Because kensi keeps posting irrelevant crap. >>>> Sure, and then one sandstorm, wipes out your solar farm, and passing >>>> nomads rip out the wiring, and make off with the panels to sell for a >>>> few bucks in a market somewhere. >>> >>> So it won't stay working in the event of a "Mad Max" post-apocalyptic >>> scenario. Neither will fossil fuels, since the motorbike-riding warlord >>> gangs will keep siphoning gas out of your tank and stealing stuff in >>> that case as well. >> >> Nope, not a "post-apocalyptic scenario" a typical scenario in most third >> world locations where the mines are. > > Asking renewable energy engineers to solve social problems is obviously > stupid, which is probably why you would do that. Look over there and ignore the issue. <snip silly screed> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-16 23:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <2UGnD.53845$OM2.9400@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #702932 |
On 9/16/2018 5:49 AM, kensi wrote: > The fight against climate change has hit a roadblock as several key > countries fail to meet the commitments they laid out to reduce emissions: > > http://time.com/5393501/climate-change-san-francisco/ Meanwhile, there is this: https://freebeacon.com/issues/report-u-s-worlds-largest-decline-co2-emissions-2017/ "The United States in 2017 experienced the largest decline in carbon emissions in the world ..."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-17 02:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360912f7ee41320a9949d6@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703095 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <2UGnD.53845$OM2.9400@fx37.iad>, JW@me.com says... > > On 9/16/2018 5:49 AM, kensi wrote: > > The fight against climate change has hit a roadblock as several key > > countries fail to meet the commitments they laid out to reduce emissions: > > > > http://time.com/5393501/climate-change-san-francisco/ > > Meanwhile, there is this: > > https://freebeacon.com/issues/report-u-s-worlds-largest-decline-co2-emissions-2017/ > "The United States in 2017 experienced the largest decline in carbon > emissions in the world ..." Funny how that works, isn't it? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 12 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web