Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #694298 > unrolled thread

Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-07-17 13:40 -0400
Last post2018-07-17 21:07 -0700
Articles 6 on this page of 26 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 13:40 -0400
    Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 16:08 -0700
      Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-17 21:01 -0700
    Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 20:19 -0400
      Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 17:48 -0700
        Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-17 18:45 -0700
          Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 21:10 -0700
            Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-18 03:32 -0700
              Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 05:29 -0700
              Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 14:20 -0700
                Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-18 16:23 -0700
                  Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 22:03 -0700
                    Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-19 05:19 -0700
                      Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 08:32 -0700
                        Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-19 12:03 -0700
                        Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 12:23 -0700
                Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 19:25 -0400
                  Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 22:04 -0700
            Does Marxism only work in white Norway, not brown India ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-12 20:38 -0700
              Re: Does Marxism only work in white Norway, not brown India ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-12 20:44 -0700
                Free Beer. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-12 21:11 -0700
                  Re: Free Beer. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-08-13 06:04 +0000
                    Born and Einstein debated for 39 years, 1916-1955. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-12 23:49 -0700
                      Niels Bohr and Einstein debated for 39 years, 1916-1955. de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-08-13 16:57 +1000
        Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 22:20 -0400
          Re: Rhode Island sues oil companies over climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 21:07 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#698235 — Free Beer.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-08-12 21:11 -0700
SubjectFree Beer.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.12--9.11pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#698228
> > Hitler was far left ( united with the 
> > "Money for nothing" civil servants )
> 
> Nope. He was a nationalist who was against equal rights...
> that is about as conservative as you can get.

Nazi rallies were often held in beer halls, 
where downtrodden men could get free beer.  

Free Beer.

To this day, his "Racist Communism" remains popular.

Does Marxism only work in white Norway, not brown India ?

Civil Servants (left) and the military (right) share power;
so they're always richer/larger/stronger than "capitalists".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#698240 — Re: Free Beer.

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-08-13 06:04 +0000
SubjectRe: Free Beer.
Message-ID<ftclbdFbj4lU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#698235
On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 21:11:57 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

>> > Hitler was far left ( united with the "Money for nothing" civil
>> > servants )
>> 
>> Nope. He was a nationalist who was against equal rights...
>> that is about as conservative as you can get.
> 
> Nazi rallies were often held in beer halls,
> where downtrodden men could get free beer.
> 
> Free Beer.
> 
> To this day, his "Racist Communism" remains popular.
> 
> Does Marxism only work in white Norway, not brown India ?
> 
> Civil Servants (left) and the military (right) share power; so they're
> always richer/larger/stronger than "capitalists".

 _ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#nauseam

Argumentum ad nauseam
This is the incorrect belief that an assertion is more likely to be true, 
or is more likely to be accepted as true, the more often it is heard. So 
an Argumentum ad Nauseam is one that employs constant repetition in 
asserting something; saying the same thing over and over again until 
you're sick of hearing it.

On the Net, your argument is often less likely to be heard if you repeat 
it over and over again, as people will tend to put you in their kill files
 _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#698247 — Born and Einstein debated for 39 years, 1916-1955.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-08-12 23:49 -0700
SubjectBorn and Einstein debated for 39 years, 1916-1955.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.12--11.49pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#698240
Scott Doty told me:
> your argument is often less likely to be heard if you repeat 
> it over and over again, as people will tend to put you in 
> their kill files.

I welcome your rebuttals, if you have any;
if not, I'm fine with that.

Born and Einstein debated for 39 years, 1916-1955.

Besides, I replied to several people on Usenet, today,
who hadn't heard what I have to say.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#698248 — Niels Bohr and Einstein debated for 39 years, 1916-1955.

Fromde chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com>
Date2018-08-13 16:57 +1000
SubjectNiels Bohr and Einstein debated for 39 years, 1916-1955.
Message-ID<DqudnVy6WshbtuzGnZ2dnUU7-IHNnZ2d@westnet.com.au>
In reply to#698247
Better I believe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694371

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-17 22:20 -0400
Message-ID<pim84r$88n$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#694359
On 7/17/2018 8:48 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 7/17/18 5:19 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 7/17/2018 1:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>>> Rhode Island on Monday sued several major oil companies, including 
>>> Exxon Mobil Corp and BP plc, accusing them of contributing to climate 
>>> change that is damaging infrastructure and coastal communities in the 
>>> state:
>>>
>>> https://af.reuters.com/article/commoditiesNews/idAFL1N1TY0MD
>>>
>>
>> More stupid lefty suits. 
> 
> I know, how dare people not want to socialize the wealthy corporations. 
> We all should be paying for the damage they do!

That is what you lefties always do, Right? Have others pay for the 
damage you do.

>> It's all those lefties know how to do.
>>
>> Wait until Exxon lawyers produce the NASA papers showing leftist hot 
>> air (water vapor) is the primary cause of so-called climate change.
> 
> Might I suggest you check out some scientific site and not Alex Jones or 
> wherever you are getting your ignorance from.

In your fantasy world NASA peer reviewed papers in scientific journals 
are obviously just nonsense. For REAL science I'm sure you check CNN or 
MSN. That's at an emotional level that you can understand.

>> Why don't they sue the clowns burning rain forest trees instead of 
>> just winking at them?
> 
> People on the left are also working to save ancient forests.

I've not seen it. Are you smart enough to understand that burning 
forests not only removes those plants that are consuming and 
"sequestering" CO2 but then cleverly burning releases all the CO2 those 
trees have stored! Win-win. And you clowns are trying to sue an oil 
company rather than Brazil greedies? How stupid are you?

This is one more example of why Libs should NEVER be given any real 
authority.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694389

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-17 21:07 -0700
Message-ID<fr7soqFrghfU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#694371
On 7/17/18 7:20 PM, benj wrote:
> On 7/17/2018 8:48 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 7/17/18 5:19 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 7/17/2018 1:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>>>> Rhode Island on Monday sued several major oil companies, including 
>>>> Exxon Mobil Corp and BP plc, accusing them of contributing to 
>>>> climate change that is damaging infrastructure and coastal 
>>>> communities in the state:
>>>>
>>>> https://af.reuters.com/article/commoditiesNews/idAFL1N1TY0MD
>>>>
>>>
>>> More stupid lefty suits. 
>>
>> I know, how dare people not want to socialize the wealthy 
>> corporations. We all should be paying for the damage they do!
> 
> That is what you lefties always do, Right? Have others pay for the 
> damage you do.

Ah, insults. But when you look at the evidence it is those on the right 
who are generally pushing to socialize the costs of the rich. That is 
what the denial of climate science is about.

>>> It's all those lefties know how to do.
>>>
>>> Wait until Exxon lawyers produce the NASA papers showing leftist hot 
>>> air (water vapor) is the primary cause of so-called climate change.
>>
>> Might I suggest you check out some scientific site and not Alex Jones 
>> or wherever you are getting your ignorance from.
> 
> In your fantasy world NASA peer reviewed papers in scientific journals 
> are obviously just nonsense. For REAL science I'm sure you check CNN or 
> MSN. That's at an emotional level that you can understand.

Let me check....

Nope. You are NOT my spokesperson.

Well, now that THAT is settled care to actually respond to my views and 
share yours instead of playing such games?

>>> Why don't they sue the clowns burning rain forest trees instead of 
>>> just winking at them?
>>
>> People on the left are also working to save ancient forests.
> 
> I've not seen it.

How can you miss it?

<https://www.google.com/search?q=save+the+rainforest>

A million examples.

> Are you smart enough to understand that burning 
> forests not only removes those plants that are consuming and 
> "sequestering" CO2 but then cleverly burning releases all the CO2 those 
> trees have stored! Win-win. And you clowns are trying to sue an oil 
> company rather than Brazil greedies? How stupid are you?

Again, why not try to respond to what is being said and not your own 
delusions?

> This is one more example of why Libs should NEVER be given any real 
> authority.

You admit to your ignorance about what liberals are doing in terms of 
forests and then run off into delusions based on that.

Lovely.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web