Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #692586 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-04 05:07 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-07-20 21:12 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 194 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 05:07 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-07-04 06:39 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 12:15 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-05 13:21 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-05 14:10 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 12:04 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-06 14:33 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:07 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-06 15:29 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-05 21:59 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-07-06 13:25 +1000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-05 23:56 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-07-06 20:02 +1000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-06 19:38 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:56 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 17:18 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:26 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:56 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 19:02 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 21:15 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:20 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 09:05 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-22 17:00 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:23 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-05 22:33 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-07-05 22:44 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-05 23:07 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-07-06 13:28 +1000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-05 23:50 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-07-06 20:03 +1000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-06 08:04 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-07-06 08:16 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-06 08:23 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-05 23:57 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-06 05:42 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-06 08:43 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-06 09:19 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-07 00:21 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:22 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-07 05:38 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-07 10:33 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-07 12:14 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-07 12:47 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-07 19:36 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 12:38 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-07-06 05:32 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-06 08:46 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-06 13:29 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-07-06 08:33 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-06 20:09 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-06 15:31 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-07 00:24 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Frank <"frank "@frank.net> - 2018-07-20 12:16 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-20 21:09 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-20 22:16 +0100
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:46 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 19:24 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-20 22:26 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-06 13:27 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-07-06 09:34 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-06 08:39 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-06 09:47 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-07-06 09:49 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-06 09:08 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-06 09:40 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 14:55 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-06 18:39 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 15:46 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 16:05 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:08 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 16:11 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-06 23:34 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:38 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-06 19:51 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:55 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 17:13 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:24 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:53 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 20:49 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:51 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 22:06 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 22:08 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:35 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-07 03:45 -0400
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-07 05:43 -0400
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-07 11:36 +0100
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-07 07:11 -0400
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-07-07 07:46 -0500
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-09 18:50 -0400
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 12:15 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-09 18:48 -0400
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 08:02 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-07 05:35 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-08 10:36 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-08 11:33 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-08 12:33 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-08 15:54 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-08 17:12 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-08 17:19 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-08 17:20 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-08 17:55 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-08 19:06 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-09 03:23 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-09 13:27 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-09 16:53 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 17:45 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 09:04 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-09 18:44 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-09 16:11 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 09:03 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:51 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:20 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:56 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-07 19:38 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 12:41 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-10 00:01 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-10 08:15 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-10 19:22 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 12:51 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-10 15:22 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-10 18:01 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-06 19:46 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:56 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 17:12 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:22 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 17:39 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:57 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 18:50 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 23:30 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:39 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 20:43 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:46 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:49 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:13 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 17:50 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:58 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 19:00 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 19:00 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-06 22:55 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:34 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 20:40 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:47 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 21:57 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:29 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 21:59 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:35 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 23:42 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-07 03:21 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 00:54 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-07 12:33 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 09:39 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 12:51 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-07 12:14 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 12:50 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Earle Jones <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2018-07-07 14:52 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-08 14:56 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 12:36 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 12:42 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 13:37 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 13:44 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:00 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:03 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:17 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 15:11 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 16:42 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 16:46 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-09 00:36 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-07-08 13:51 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 12:37 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-08 16:16 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 13:42 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 13:57 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:01 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:12 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 15:10 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 16:40 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 16:45 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-15 01:45 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 00:56 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:42 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Catalina" <Catalina@Beach.Sun> - 2018-07-15 00:09 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-15 00:38 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Catalina" <Catalina@Beach.Sun> - 2018-07-20 04:01 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 05:12 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-20 11:04 +0100
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-07-15 01:40 -0600
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-15 08:08 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 12:25 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Catalina" <Catalina@Beach.Sun> - 2018-07-20 04:03 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-20 08:31 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 11:53 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-20 21:12 +0000
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-04 05:07 -0400 |
| Subject | Antarctica is melting faster than we knew |
| Message-ID | <phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to protect the southernmost continent: https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-04 06:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0r8pjdthgk3n5kvefoeu7o9mkan2gsqt5i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #692586 |
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:07:29 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >protect the southernmost continent: > >https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 Yeah, it is really hot down there. https://goo.gl/gUuKT7 Regards, Boris Mohar Got Knock? - see: Viatrack Printed Circuit Designs (among other things) http://www.viatrack.ca void _-void-_ in the obvious place --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-05 12:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <552e682f-9618-44b2-9bb1-96d80c77e2e8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #692586 |
On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 at 2:07:34 AM UTC-7, kensi wrote: > Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to > protect the southernmost continent: > > https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 > > -- > "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain > the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks > "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade > in here." ~Checkmate My LA Glazier iceburg is first going to Capetown.They have no fresh water.Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-05 13:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <phlukg$ob$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #692666 |
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> listen: Given your own computer savvy, you Bert, have replied to a notification that contained this 2-liner: > "I, Bert got mad and irrational in my response to the posters in items (1) to (5) because they were laughing at me". -- Bert > So, Bert the moment you simply re-post THIS current post, like you did before, then information will be given to you for Bert to get a well deserved Nobel for your experiment by which you demonstrated stopping light 3" from its source. > > > Furthermore, the following may NOT be needed anymore to remind you of: > > > > > ------------- Bert's posted items (1) to (5) --------- > (1) On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Face-Shitter Glazier wrote: Harlow Campbell HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, & Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net & Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide". <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> > (2) On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, JewPigBert Glazier said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: "Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser. For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser." <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> "Benj, you can thank me in advance". - TreBert. ... addinng > (3) On 03Aug2017: "benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears." > (4) On 25Mar2008, Graveyard Vandal Glazier wrote in: <https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J> "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh when it seeps down on your face". -- Bert > (5) On 24Jun2018 SwineBert Glazier said to Mark Earnest <gmearnest@att.net> "your nose is in a shit bucket all the time. Eat shit and you fit" -- Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-05 14:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbbdd764-af04-4478-8f9a-d2be120f0a8a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #692666 |
On Thursday, July 5, 2018 at 12:15:19 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 at 2:07:34 AM UTC-7, kensi wrote: > > Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to > > protect the southernmost continent: > > > > https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 > > > > -- > > "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain > > the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks > > "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade > > in here." ~Checkmate > > My LA Glazier iceburg is first going to Capetown.They have no fresh water.Bert The coldest temperature ever recorded on Earth, -144F, was recently measured in Antarctica! That's cold enough for dry ice snowflakes to fall, as they do on the polar areas of Mars! https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/06/coldest-place-earth-measured-temperature-antarctica-science/ So where is global warming? Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 12:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c9514d82-f794-48d2-97ad-a14b6cf2235f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #692677 |
On Thursday, July 5, 2018 at 2:10:32 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > On Thursday, July 5, 2018 at 12:15:19 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 at 2:07:34 AM UTC-7, kensi wrote: > > > Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to > > > protect the southernmost continent: > > > > > > https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 > > > > > > -- > > > "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain > > > the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks > > > "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade > > > in here." ~Checkmate > > > > My LA Glazier iceburg is first going to Capetown.They have no fresh water.Bert > > > The coldest temperature ever recorded on Earth, -144F, was recently measured in Antarctica! That's cold enough for dry ice snowflakes to fall, as they do on the polar areas of Mars! > > https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/06/coldest-place-earth-measured-temperature-antarctica-science/ > > So where is global warming? > > Double-A Global warming is here in Anaheim,104 sunny no rain.Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 14:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <phon79$ls7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #692777 |
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: "global warming is here in Anaheim,104 sunny no rain" says Bert who will get Nobel-claiming info when Bert answers the post regarding Bert's Light 3" stoppage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-08 14:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6a8039af-1c41-4769-9a84-1024fabe968b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #692677 |
On Thursday, July 5, 2018 at 5:10:32 PM UTC-4, Double-A wrote: > The coldest temperature ever recorded on Earth, -144F, > was recently measured in Antarctica! That's cold enough > for dry ice snowflakes to fall, as they do on the polar > areas of Mars! > > https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/06/coldest-place-earth-measured-temperature-antarctica-science/ > > So where is global warming? > > Double-A You just don't understand the word global, do you? Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 15:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <phojgg$1945$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #692666 |
On 7/5/2018 2:15 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 at 2:07:34 AM UTC-7, kensi wrote: >> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >> protect the southernmost continent: >> >> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >> >> -- >> "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain >> the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks >> "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade >> in here." ~Checkmate > > My LA Glazier iceburg is first going to Capetown.They have no fresh water.Bert > Cap Town => A city council specially met on January 19th, 2018 to take unusual decisions in order to save drastically the available water. A range of emergency measures were told by the city to the residents who see their life radically changing since February, 1st 2018. Each one in the city will have as much as possible to save water for example not allowing the tap to run while brushing teeth, no more than just 2 mn shower. As the water reserves are already under 27%, only 50l for 150 days is recommended per person per day to avoid day zero in 2018. Farmers shall reduce their consumption for their fields. Dirty water or rain water in a basket shall be used to flush the poo in the loo. Washing cars and pools fillings are forbidden. Patricia de Lille blamed 3.7 million people for not obeying the restrictions, precisely people living in greater Cape Town. Public pools, spray parks and fountains have been closed. On Day Zero, the water reserves will decrease to 13% of their capacity. The city will cut public water. People will have to queue for their daily rationing of drinking water by 200 water points under police presence and carry their gallons on the head: “25l minimum per day per person, 18l for laundry, 15l for shower, 9l for toilet, 3l for washing hands, 2l for cooking, 2l for drinking, 1l for animals”. Alistair Coy, a British visitor to Cape Town, said to the British journal “The Independent “A true nightmare scenario is developing in front of our eyes.” Jamie Bowden, a long time visitor to the city explained to the same journal “The water crisis is the only topic of conversation”. In hotels, visitors are urged to limit showers to 90 seconds and to flush the toilet as little as possible. Hotel bath plugs have been removed. UK government advices not to travel to Cap Town. As the Bloomberg agency reported, South Africa tourism industry is losing benefits, wine industry too. South Africa wine industry is the 7th largest in the world. Bloomberg analysts fear more crucial threatens on public health and social order.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-05 21:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <phmj3t$d0e$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #692586 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... > Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to > protect the southernmost continent: > > https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice makers....that will solve the problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 13:25 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #692713 |
On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: > > > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... >> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want >> to protect the southernmost continent: >> >> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >> > > I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice makers....that will > solve the problem. > > **Who is "them"? * How many ice makers do you think will be required? * How will the ice makers be powered? * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less than 100% efficient)? -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-05 23:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <phmurc$ug6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #692717 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... > On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >>> protect the southernmost continent: >>> >>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >> >> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice makers....that will >> solve the problem. >> >> > > **Who is "them"? Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. > * How many ice makers do you think will be required? Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. > * How will the ice makers be powered? However they like, since it's not my problem. > * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or worse > (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less than 100% > efficient)? I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice makers on the job. So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of new ice you desire. > > -- > Trevor Wilson > www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 20:02 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #692729 |
On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... >> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we >>>> want to protect the southernmost continent: >>>> >>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >>>> >>> >>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice makers....that >>> will solve the problem. >>> >>> >> >> **Who is "them"? > > Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. **OK. > > >> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? > > Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. **It was your solution. I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required data to tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of course, you're blowing smoke again. > >> * How will the ice makers be powered? > > However they like, since it's not my problem. **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required information to deal with YOUR solution. > > >> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or >> worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less than >> 100% efficient)? > > I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice makers > on the job. **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less than 100% will result in a nett increase in temperatures. I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In fact, they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around the back of your fridge and check out the heat coming from the compressor. It's all wasted energy. > > So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of new > ice you desire. **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient ice makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the fundamental laws of this universe. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 19:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <phov9p$veu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #692741 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net... > On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want >>>>> to protect the southernmost continent: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >>>> >>>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice makers....that >>>> will solve the problem. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> **Who is "them"? >> >> Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. > > **OK. > >> >> >>> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? >> >> Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. > > **It was your solution. Sure. > I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required data to > tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of course, you're > blowing smoke again. Not my problem, because I don't really care if they use 1 ice maker or a Billion ice makers. I'm not the one worried about the ice. >>> * How will the ice makers be powered? >> >> However they like, since it's not my problem. > > **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required information to > deal with YOUR solution. I did. The details are left up to those since those all decide on how much ice they deem is "appropriate". >>> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or worse >>> (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less than 100% >>> efficient)? >> >> I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice makers on >> the job. > > **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less than 100% > will result in a nett increase in temperatures. So? You can build a glacier in the desert as long as you can produce the ice faster than it melts. Just means you will need more ice machines. > I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In fact, > they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around the back of > your fridge and check out the heat coming from the compressor. It's all > wasted energy. If you say so, but that's your problem. Personally I think worrying about trying to control a natural cycle is wasted energy, but apparently some feel it's necessary. >> So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of new >> ice you desire. > > **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient ice > makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the fundamental laws > of this universe. So I suppose that means that ice could never have formed in the first place since according to your claims it would have been impossible for it to have formed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 16:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bdll50.5ok.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #692824 |
On 2018-07-06 4:38 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we >>>>>> want to protect the southernmost continent: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice makers....that >>>>> will solve the problem. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> **Who is "them"? >>> >>> Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. >> >> **OK. >> >>> >>> >>>> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? >>> >>> Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. >> >> **It was your solution. > > Sure. > >> I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required data >> to tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of course, >> you're blowing smoke again. > > Not my problem, because I don't really care if they use 1 ice maker or a > Billion ice makers. I'm not the one worried about the ice. > >>>> * How will the ice makers be powered? >>> >>> However they like, since it's not my problem. >> >> **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required >> information to deal with YOUR solution. > > I did. The details are left up to those since those all decide on how > much ice they deem is "appropriate". > > >>>> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or >>>> worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less than >>>> 100% efficient)? >>> >>> I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice >>> makers on the job. >> >> **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less than >> 100% will result in a nett increase in temperatures. > > So? You can build a glacier in the desert as long as you can produce the > ice faster than it melts. > > Just means you will need more ice machines. > >> I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In >> fact, they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around the >> back of your fridge and check out the heat coming from the compressor. >> It's all wasted energy. > > If you say so, but that's your problem. Personally I think worrying > about trying to control a natural cycle is wasted energy, but apparently > some feel it's necessary. > >>> So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of >>> new ice you desire. >> >> **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient ice >> makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the fundamental >> laws of this universe. > > So I suppose that means that ice could never have formed in the first > place since according to your claims it would have been impossible for > it to have formed. > > yes that's right
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 17:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <php0th$a9e$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #692831 |
On 7/6/2018 4:56 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-07-06 4:38 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>> news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we >>>>>>> want to protect the southernmost continent: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice >>>>>> makers....that will solve the problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> **Who is "them"? >>>> >>>> Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. >>> >>> **OK. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? >>>> >>>> Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. >>> >>> **It was your solution. >> >> Sure. >> >>> I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required >>> data to tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of >>> course, you're blowing smoke again. >> >> Not my problem, because I don't really care if they use 1 ice maker or >> a Billion ice makers. I'm not the one worried about the ice. >> >>>>> * How will the ice makers be powered? >>>> >>>> However they like, since it's not my problem. >>> >>> **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required >>> information to deal with YOUR solution. >> >> I did. The details are left up to those since those all decide on how >> much ice they deem is "appropriate". >> >> >>>>> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or >>>>> worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less than >>>>> 100% efficient)? >>>> >>>> I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice >>>> makers on the job. >>> >>> **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less than >>> 100% will result in a nett increase in temperatures. >> >> So? You can build a glacier in the desert as long as you can produce >> the ice faster than it melts. >> >> Just means you will need more ice machines. >> >>> I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In >>> fact, they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around the >>> back of your fridge and check out the heat coming from the >>> compressor. It's all wasted energy. >> >> If you say so, but that's your problem. Personally I think worrying >> about trying to control a natural cycle is wasted energy, but >> apparently some feel it's necessary. >> >>>> So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of >>>> new ice you desire. >>> >>> **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient >>> ice makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the >>> fundamental laws of this universe. >> >> So I suppose that means that ice could never have formed in the first >> place since according to your claims it would have been impossible for >> it to have formed. >> >> > yes that's right Not sure what you mean here... Are you basically outright denying that any Ice Age existed on Earth? Fwiw, Lake Tahoe was formed during the Ice Age. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Tahoe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleistocene Mount Pluto dammed the lake: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pluto,_California
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 17:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35a9a876da614490994298@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #692838 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <php0th$a9e$1@dont-email.me>, invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says... > > On 7/6/2018 4:56 PM, % wrote: > > On 2018-07-06 4:38 PM, Scout wrote: > >> > >> > >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > >> news:fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net... > >>> On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > >>>> news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... > >>>>> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > >>>>>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... > >>>>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we > >>>>>>> want to protect the southernmost continent: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice > >>>>>> makers....that will solve the problem. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> **Who is "them"? > >>>> > >>>> Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. > >>> > >>> **OK. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? > >>>> > >>>> Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. > >>> > >>> **It was your solution. > >> > >> Sure. > >> > >>> I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required > >>> data to tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of > >>> course, you're blowing smoke again. > >> > >> Not my problem, because I don't really care if they use 1 ice maker or > >> a Billion ice makers. I'm not the one worried about the ice. > >> > >>>>> * How will the ice makers be powered? > >>>> > >>>> However they like, since it's not my problem. > >>> > >>> **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required > >>> information to deal with YOUR solution. > >> > >> I did. The details are left up to those since those all decide on how > >> much ice they deem is "appropriate". > >> > >> > >>>>> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or > >>>>> worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less than > >>>>> 100% efficient)? > >>>> > >>>> I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice > >>>> makers on the job. > >>> > >>> **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less than > >>> 100% will result in a nett increase in temperatures. > >> > >> So? You can build a glacier in the desert as long as you can produce > >> the ice faster than it melts. > >> > >> Just means you will need more ice machines. > >> > >>> I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In > >>> fact, they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around the > >>> back of your fridge and check out the heat coming from the > >>> compressor. It's all wasted energy. > >> > >> If you say so, but that's your problem. Personally I think worrying > >> about trying to control a natural cycle is wasted energy, but > >> apparently some feel it's necessary. > >> > >>>> So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of > >>>> new ice you desire. > >>> > >>> **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient > >>> ice makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the > >>> fundamental laws of this universe. > >> > >> So I suppose that means that ice could never have formed in the first > >> place since according to your claims it would have been impossible for > >> it to have formed. > >> > >> > > yes that's right > > Not sure what you mean here... Are you basically outright denying that > any Ice Age existed on Earth? Fwiw, Lake Tahoe was formed during the Ice > Age. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Tahoe > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleistocene > > Mount Pluto dammed the lake: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pluto,_California HINT: He's a retarded Mongoloid. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 17:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bdlokh.v9u.19.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #692838 |
On 2018-07-06 5:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 7/6/2018 4:56 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-07-06 4:38 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>>> news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we >>>>>>>> want to protect the southernmost continent: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice >>>>>>> makers....that will solve the problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> **Who is "them"? >>>>> >>>>> Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. >>>> >>>> **OK. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? >>>>> >>>>> Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. >>>> >>>> **It was your solution. >>> >>> Sure. >>> >>>> I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required >>>> data to tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of >>>> course, you're blowing smoke again. >>> >>> Not my problem, because I don't really care if they use 1 ice maker >>> or a Billion ice makers. I'm not the one worried about the ice. >>> >>>>>> * How will the ice makers be powered? >>>>> >>>>> However they like, since it's not my problem. >>>> >>>> **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required >>>> information to deal with YOUR solution. >>> >>> I did. The details are left up to those since those all decide on how >>> much ice they deem is "appropriate". >>> >>> >>>>>> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or >>>>>> worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less >>>>>> than 100% efficient)? >>>>> >>>>> I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice >>>>> makers on the job. >>>> >>>> **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less than >>>> 100% will result in a nett increase in temperatures. >>> >>> So? You can build a glacier in the desert as long as you can produce >>> the ice faster than it melts. >>> >>> Just means you will need more ice machines. >>> >>>> I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In >>>> fact, they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around >>>> the back of your fridge and check out the heat coming from the >>>> compressor. It's all wasted energy. >>> >>> If you say so, but that's your problem. Personally I think worrying >>> about trying to control a natural cycle is wasted energy, but >>> apparently some feel it's necessary. >>> >>>>> So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of >>>>> new ice you desire. >>>> >>>> **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient >>>> ice makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the >>>> fundamental laws of this universe. >>> >>> So I suppose that means that ice could never have formed in the first >>> place since according to your claims it would have been impossible >>> for it to have formed. >>> >>> >> yes that's right > > Not sure what you mean here... Are you basically outright denying that > any Ice Age existed on Earth? Fwiw, Lake Tahoe was formed during the Ice > Age. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Tahoe > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleistocene > > Mount Pluto dammed the lake: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pluto,_California i don't know what fwiw is
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 19:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35a9bf15f0f7bdd999429c@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #692849 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bdlokh.v9u.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-07-06 5:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > On 7/6/2018 4:56 PM, % wrote: > >> On 2018-07-06 4:38 PM, Scout wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > >>> news:fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net... > >>>> On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > >>>>> news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... > >>>>>> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > >>>>>>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... > >>>>>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we > >>>>>>>> want to protect the southernmost continent: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice > >>>>>>> makers....that will solve the problem. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> **Who is "them"? > >>>>> > >>>>> Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. > >>>> > >>>> **OK. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? > >>>>> > >>>>> Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. > >>>> > >>>> **It was your solution. > >>> > >>> Sure. > >>> > >>>> I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required > >>>> data to tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of > >>>> course, you're blowing smoke again. > >>> > >>> Not my problem, because I don't really care if they use 1 ice maker > >>> or a Billion ice makers. I'm not the one worried about the ice. > >>> > >>>>>> * How will the ice makers be powered? > >>>>> > >>>>> However they like, since it's not my problem. > >>>> > >>>> **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required > >>>> information to deal with YOUR solution. > >>> > >>> I did. The details are left up to those since those all decide on how > >>> much ice they deem is "appropriate". > >>> > >>> > >>>>>> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or > >>>>>> worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less > >>>>>> than 100% efficient)? > >>>>> > >>>>> I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice > >>>>> makers on the job. > >>>> > >>>> **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less than > >>>> 100% will result in a nett increase in temperatures. > >>> > >>> So? You can build a glacier in the desert as long as you can produce > >>> the ice faster than it melts. > >>> > >>> Just means you will need more ice machines. > >>> > >>>> I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In > >>>> fact, they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around > >>>> the back of your fridge and check out the heat coming from the > >>>> compressor. It's all wasted energy. > >>> > >>> If you say so, but that's your problem. Personally I think worrying > >>> about trying to control a natural cycle is wasted energy, but > >>> apparently some feel it's necessary. > >>> > >>>>> So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of > >>>>> new ice you desire. > >>>> > >>>> **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient > >>>> ice makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the > >>>> fundamental laws of this universe. > >>> > >>> So I suppose that means that ice could never have formed in the first > >>> place since according to your claims it would have been impossible > >>> for it to have formed. > >>> > >>> > >> yes that's right > > > > Not sure what you mean here... Are you basically outright denying that > > any Ice Age existed on Earth? Fwiw, Lake Tahoe was formed during the Ice > > Age. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Tahoe > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleistocene > > > > Mount Pluto dammed the lake: > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pluto,_California > > i don't know what fwiw is Figure it out. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 21:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <phpeou$n7r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #692856 |
On 7/6/2018 7:02 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bdlokh.v9u.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-07-06 5:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> On 7/6/2018 4:56 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-07-06 4:38 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>>> news:fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we >>>>>>>>>> want to protect the southernmost continent: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice >>>>>>>>> makers....that will solve the problem. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **Who is "them"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. >>>>>> >>>>>> **OK. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. >>>>>> >>>>>> **It was your solution. >>>>> >>>>> Sure. >>>>> >>>>>> I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required >>>>>> data to tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of >>>>>> course, you're blowing smoke again. >>>>> >>>>> Not my problem, because I don't really care if they use 1 ice maker >>>>> or a Billion ice makers. I'm not the one worried about the ice. >>>>> >>>>>>>> * How will the ice makers be powered? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> However they like, since it's not my problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required >>>>>> information to deal with YOUR solution. >>>>> >>>>> I did. The details are left up to those since those all decide on how >>>>> much ice they deem is "appropriate". >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or >>>>>>>> worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less >>>>>>>> than 100% efficient)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice >>>>>>> makers on the job. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less than >>>>>> 100% will result in a nett increase in temperatures. >>>>> >>>>> So? You can build a glacier in the desert as long as you can produce >>>>> the ice faster than it melts. >>>>> >>>>> Just means you will need more ice machines. >>>>> >>>>>> I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In >>>>>> fact, they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around >>>>>> the back of your fridge and check out the heat coming from the >>>>>> compressor. It's all wasted energy. >>>>> >>>>> If you say so, but that's your problem. Personally I think worrying >>>>> about trying to control a natural cycle is wasted energy, but >>>>> apparently some feel it's necessary. >>>>> >>>>>>> So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of >>>>>>> new ice you desire. >>>>>> >>>>>> **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient >>>>>> ice makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the >>>>>> fundamental laws of this universe. >>>>> >>>>> So I suppose that means that ice could never have formed in the first >>>>> place since according to your claims it would have been impossible >>>>> for it to have formed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> yes that's right >>> >>> Not sure what you mean here... Are you basically outright denying that >>> any Ice Age existed on Earth? Fwiw, Lake Tahoe was formed during the Ice >>> Age. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Tahoe >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleistocene >>> >>> Mount Pluto dammed the lake: >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pluto,_California >> >> i don't know what fwiw is > > Figure it out. > I think it just might of failed the following "test": http://bladerunner.wikia.com/wiki/Voight-Kampff_machine https://youtu.be/Umc9ezAyJv0 Always liked the test with Sean Young. :^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web