Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #690582 > unrolled thread

We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-06-14 07:14 -0400
Last post2018-07-01 14:06 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 103 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-14 07:14 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-14 11:22 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-14 11:56 -0500
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:30 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0700
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-15 04:54 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:06 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-15 21:27 -0500
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 02:49 +0000
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:25 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:31 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 01:23 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:30 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-16 01:38 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:28 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:28 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-16 05:48 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 02:19 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:45 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:11 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:23 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 14:01 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:42 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 19:48 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:24 -0700
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-16 20:25 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:59 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:43 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:54 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:10 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:51 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:05 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change will <willscranton@butchersboulevard.commypanprofile> - 2018-06-23 06:41 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-15 22:25 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:44 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:34 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:25 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 21:16 -0500
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-24 22:39 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 22:49 -0500
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-25 00:17 -0400
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-25 13:44 -0500
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:46 -0700
                              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:54 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 05:10 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 23:19 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 02:42 +0000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:08 -0700
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 06:03 +1000
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-23 16:47 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 15:36 +1000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-24 13:09 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 06:35 +1000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-24 21:50 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 14:55 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:48 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:50 -0700
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:10 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:13 -0700
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:21 -0700
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:27 -0700
                              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 18:38 -0700
                                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:27 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 10:18 +1000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:20 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-30 13:12 +0000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-30 08:50 -0500
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 14:08 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 09:02 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-30 10:18 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 04:01 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-03 05:04 -0400
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 23:31 -0400
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 05:17 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 03:37 -0700
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:12 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 11:21 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-05 23:12 -0500
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-30 12:13 -0500
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-25 18:36 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 15:03 +0000
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:21 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:38 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:51 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 13:16 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:18 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:16 +0000
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 17:20 +0000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:22 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:06 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:09 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:10 +0000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:12 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-01 19:51 +0100
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 10:45 -0700
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:11 +0000
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-07-01 15:01 -0600
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 14:06 -0700

Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6  Next page →

#692599

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-07-04 11:21 -0400
Message-ID<phiolt$1irp$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#692598
On 7/4/2018 11:12 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:ph83fp$d67$1
> @gioia.aioe.org:
>> On 6/30/2018 9:12 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>> Who gives a fuck?
>>
>> I do, dickwad.
> 
> You don't matter.

Yes, I do.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692726

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-07-05 23:12 -0500
Message-ID<phmq8k$4ra$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#692261
On 6/30/2018 8:12 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
> news:pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me: 
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't
>>>>> read it's posts.
>>>>
>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>
>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>
>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use 
>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by
>> many people.
>>
> 
> Who gives a fuck? I don't alter my life to accomodate the mentally ill.
> 

that is what a mentally ill person says, every day.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692270

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-06-30 12:13 -0500
Message-ID<ph8dmp$v8r$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#691664
On 6/23/2018 3:47 PM, benj wrote:
> On 6/23/2018 4:03 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/06/2018 6:54 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-change-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's ok, so are the models that predict the climate change.
>>>
>>> https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/global-warming-who-are-the-deniers-now/
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420783/Worlds-climate-scientists-confess-Global-warming-just-QUARTER-thought--computers-got-effects-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html
>>>
>>
>> **As long as you continue to fail to acquire your knowledge from
>> CREDIBLE scientific sources, you'll continue to appear the fool that
>> you are. Dodgy news sites are not sources of science. You are a sad,
>> pathetic indictment of the US education system.
> 
> Listen to sheep shearing wisdom from Trevor of Oz!
> 
> Scout, if you are ever to have a true understanding of "Climate Change"
> like Trevor and Dr. Kensi, then you should start looking that the links
> Dr.Kensi posts proving climate change. She has a Ph.D. in physics which
> unquestionably makes her an authority on proper sources of scientific
> data. And no doubt this is where Trevor gets his information too.
> 
> Recent "kensi" science sources: Foreign Affairs (CFR) magazine,
> ecowatch.com, SkepticalScience.com (failed cartoonist), grist.org,CNN,
> Economics.com, TheGuardian.com, counterpunch.org, NYMag.com, Vox.com,
> NatioinalGeographic.com, Livescience.com, CNN (again), USAToday.com,
> Ecowatch.com and on and on...
> 
> These are ALL PH.D. level science source papers picked by Dr. Kensi for
> irrefutable proof that the science of climate change is "settled" and
> only a "denier" would try to say otherwise. So Scout, if you want to not
> appear to be the fool, start using actual Ph.D level sources of
> information and science as Trevor and Dr. Kensi do. Other wise just STFU
> and let them have the floor!


kensi pupa, Trevor the Troutnik, (and halfbaked Nads) => the simple
minded links in a failed chain to propagandize "glowball Worming" [which
now is officially DOA].

>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691863

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-06-25 18:36 -0400
Message-ID<pgrrjr$hum$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#691656

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message 
news:fp7nd7Fo2mkU1@mid.individual.net...
> On 15/06/2018 6:54 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>
>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-change-global-warming-models-risks
>>
>> That's ok, so are the models that predict the climate change.
>>
>> https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/global-warming-who-are-the-deniers-now/ 
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420783/Worlds-climate-scientists-confess-Global-warming-just-QUARTER-thought--computers-got-effects-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html
>
> **As long as you continue to fail to acquire your knowledge from CREDIBLE 
> scientific sources,

Like VOX?????????????????


"Vox explains the news.

We live in a world of too much information and too little context. Too much 
noise and too little insight. And so Vox's JOURNALISTS candidly shepherd 
audiences through politics and policy, business and pop culture, food, 
science, and everything else that matters. You can find our work wherever 
you live on the internet — Facebook, YouTube, email, iTunes, Snapchat, 
Instagram, and more. "(Emphasis added)
https://www.vox.com/pages/about-us

Once again we see Trevor's use of his double standard. Don't do as he does, 
but do what he claims he should be doing but doesn't.

Meanwhile, I note Trevor attempting to attack the messenger because he can't 
deal with the message.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692323

FromAvenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>
Date2018-07-01 15:03 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA91270676AD75greyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>
In reply to#690582
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org: 

> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
> 
> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-ch
> ange-global-warming-models-risks 
> 

Models, Which are not confirmed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692326

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-07-01 11:21 -0400
Message-ID<phari7$ije$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#692323
On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
> 
>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>
>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-ch
>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>
> Models, Which are not confirmed.

Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and 
attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be 
installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage at 
Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change induced 
sea level rise.

Yes?

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692328

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-01 08:38 -0700
Message-ID<bd7i2a.kih.17.28@news.alt.net>
In reply to#692326
On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>
>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>
>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-ch
>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>
>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
> 
> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and 
> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be 
> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage at 
> Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change induced 
> sea level rise.
> 
> Yes?
> 
why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692329

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-07-01 11:47 -0400
Message-ID<phat34$kq2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#692328
On 7/1/2018 11:38 AM, % wrote:
> On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>
>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-ch
>>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>
>>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
>>
>> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and 
>> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be 
>> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage at 
>> Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change 
>> induced sea level rise.
>>
>> Yes?
>>
> why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny

If I don't protect The President's investments that he made with other 
people's money, who will?

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692330

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-01 08:51 -0700
Message-ID<bd7ir7.sqf.19.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#692329
On 2018-07-01 8:47 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 7/1/2018 11:38 AM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>>
>>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-ch 
>>>>>
>>>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>>
>>>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
>>>
>>> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and 
>>> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be 
>>> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage 
>>> at Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change 
>>> induced sea level rise.
>>>
>>> Yes?
>>>
>> why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny
> 
> If I don't protect The President's investments that he made with other 
> people's money, who will?
> 
you already did yesterday

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692335

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-07-01 13:16 -0400
Message-ID<phb28u$tdd$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#692330
On 7/1/2018 11:51 AM, % wrote:
> On 2018-07-01 8:47 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>> On 7/1/2018 11:38 AM, % wrote:
>>> On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>>> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-ch 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>>>
>>>>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and 
>>>> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be 
>>>> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage 
>>>> at Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change 
>>>> induced sea level rise.
>>>>
>>>> Yes?
>>>>
>>> why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny
>>
>> If I don't protect The President's investments that he made with other 
>> people's money, who will?
>>
> you already did yesterday

It's a different day and a big holiday weekend.  Today, the realtors are 
tying red, white and blue balloons to the telephone poles and mail boxes 
so people will know there's a house showing on the street.

There's one across the street with an Alexa on the fence so people can 
let the realtor know they're there.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692336

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-01 10:18 -0700
Message-ID<bd7nuf.gci.17.6@news.alt.net>
In reply to#692335
On 2018-07-01 10:16 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 7/1/2018 11:51 AM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-07-01 8:47 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>> On 7/1/2018 11:38 AM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>>>> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-ch 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and 
>>>>> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be 
>>>>> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage 
>>>>> at Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change 
>>>>> induced sea level rise.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes?
>>>>>
>>>> why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny
>>>
>>> If I don't protect The President's investments that he made with 
>>> other people's money, who will?
>>>
>> you already did yesterday
> 
> It's a different day and a big holiday weekend.  Today, the realtors are 
> tying red, white and blue balloons to the telephone poles and mail boxes 
> so people will know there's a house showing on the street.
> 
> There's one across the street with an Alexa on the fence so people can 
> let the realtor know they're there.
> 
you need a puppy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692344

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-07-01 18:16 +0000
Message-ID<fpsk33Fm7sbU7@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#692335
On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 13:16:14 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:

> On 7/1/2018 11:51 AM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-07-01 8:47 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>> On 7/1/2018 11:38 AM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>>>> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/
climate-ch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and
>>>>> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be
>>>>> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage
>>>>> at Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change
>>>>> induced sea level rise.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes?
>>>>>
>>>> why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny
>>>
>>> If I don't protect The President's investments that he made with other
>>> people's money, who will?
>>>
>> you already did yesterday
> 
> It's a different day and a big holiday weekend.  Today, the realtors are
> tying red, white and blue balloons to the telephone poles and mail boxes
> so people will know there's a house showing on the street.
> 
> There's one across the street with an Alexa on the fence so people can
> let the realtor know they're there.

Tell Alexa to play "Kickstart My Heart" in the house.

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692337

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-07-01 17:20 +0000
Message-ID<fpsgr7Fm7sbU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#692328
On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 08:38:22 -0700, % wrote:

> On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>
>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-
ch
>>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>
>>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
>> 
>> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and
>> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be
>> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage at
>> Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change induced
>> sea level rise.
>> 
>> Yes?
>> 
> why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny

Subjective claim noted and rejected.

MN is always funny.

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692338

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-01 10:22 -0700
Message-ID<bd7o5l.gci.17.10@news.alt.net>
In reply to#692337
On 2018-07-01 10:20 AM, vallor wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 08:38:22 -0700, % wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>>
>>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-
> ch
>>>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>>
>>>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
>>>
>>> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and
>>> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be
>>> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage at
>>> Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change induced
>>> sea level rise.
>>>
>>> Yes?
>>>
>> why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny
> 
> Subjective claim noted and rejected.
> 
> MN is always funny.
> 
it's your right to be wrong

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692340

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-07-01 18:06 +0000
Message-ID<fpsjggFm7sbU5@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#692338
On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 10:22:33 -0700, % wrote:

> On 2018-07-01 10:20 AM, vallor wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 08:38:22 -0700, % wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>>> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/
climate-
>> ch
>>>>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>>>
>>>>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and
>>>> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be
>>>> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage
>>>> at Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change
>>>> induced sea level rise.
>>>>
>>>> Yes?
>>>>
>>> why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny
>> 
>> Subjective claim noted and rejected.
>> 
>> MN is always funny.
>> 
> it's your right to be wrong

And it's your right to be wrong about me being wrong, wrong-way.

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692341

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-01 11:09 -0700
Message-ID<bd7qtn.sh.19.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to#692340
On 2018-07-01 11:06 AM, vallor wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 10:22:33 -0700, % wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-07-01 10:20 AM, vallor wrote:
>>> On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 08:38:22 -0700, % wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>>>> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/
> climate-
>>> ch
>>>>>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and
>>>>> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be
>>>>> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage
>>>>> at Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change
>>>>> induced sea level rise.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes?
>>>>>
>>>> why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny
>>>
>>> Subjective claim noted and rejected.
>>>
>>> MN is always funny.
>>>
>> it's your right to be wrong
> 
> And it's your right to be wrong about me being wrong, wrong-way.
> 
i'm glad you can accept the error of your ways

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692342

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-07-01 18:10 +0000
Message-ID<fpsjooFm7sbU6@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#692341
On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 11:09:30 -0700, % wrote:

> On 2018-07-01 11:06 AM, vallor wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 10:22:33 -0700, % wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2018-07-01 10:20 AM, vallor wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 08:38:22 -0700, % wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/
>> climate-
>>>> ch
>>>>>>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and
>>>>>> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be
>>>>>> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage
>>>>>> at Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change
>>>>>> induced sea level rise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes?
>>>>>>
>>>>> why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny
>>>>
>>>> Subjective claim noted and rejected.
>>>>
>>>> MN is always funny.
>>>>
>>> it's your right to be wrong
>> 
>> And it's your right to be wrong about me being wrong, wrong-way.
>> 
> i'm glad you can accept the error of your ways

Yeah, I'll admit I was wrong about you being right.

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692343

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-01 11:12 -0700
Message-ID<bd7r37.sh.19.6@news.alt.net>
In reply to#692342
On 2018-07-01 11:10 AM, vallor wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 11:09:30 -0700, % wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-07-01 11:06 AM, vallor wrote:
>>> On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 10:22:33 -0700, % wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2018-07-01 10:20 AM, vallor wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 08:38:22 -0700, % wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2018-07-01 8:21 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/1/2018 11:03 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/
>>> climate-
>>>>> ch
>>>>>>>>> ange-global-warming-models-risks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Models, Which are not confirmed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, but you have to agree that gigantic, and very beautiful and
>>>>>>> attractive, dikes, pumps, damns and floodgates absolutely must be
>>>>>>> installed to eliminate any possibility of flooding and storm damage
>>>>>>> at Trump branded properties around the world due to climate change
>>>>>>> induced sea level rise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> why do you have to do it well after its lost all its funny
>>>>>
>>>>> Subjective claim noted and rejected.
>>>>>
>>>>> MN is always funny.
>>>>>
>>>> it's your right to be wrong
>>>
>>> And it's your right to be wrong about me being wrong, wrong-way.
>>>
>> i'm glad you can accept the error of your ways
> 
> Yeah, I'll admit I was wrong about you being right.
> 
yes that's right you were wrong about your right

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692422

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-07-01 19:51 +0100
Message-ID<1nr9z3i.1aferbo1jl5shkN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#692342
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

[...]

> >>>> MN is always funny.
> >>>>
> >>> it's your right to be wrong
> >> 
> >> And it's your right to be wrong about me being wrong, wrong-way.
> >> 
> > i'm glad you can accept the error of your ways
> 
> Yeah, I'll admit I was wrong about you being right.

Two wrongs don't make a right but three lefts do.

-- 
^Ï^.           Sn!pe           <snipeco.1@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692429

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-02 10:45 -0700
Message-ID<bdadt2.s3p.19.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to#692422
On 2018-07-01 11:51 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>>>> MN is always funny.
>>>>>>
>>>>> it's your right to be wrong
>>>>
>>>> And it's your right to be wrong about me being wrong, wrong-way.
>>>>
>>> i'm glad you can accept the error of your ways
>>
>> Yeah, I'll admit I was wrong about you being right.
> 
> Two wrongs don't make a right but three lefts do.
> 
two blondes don't make a white

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web