Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #687921 > unrolled thread
| Started by | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 02:37 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-06-03 09:06 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 578 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 02:37 -0400
Re:Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-31 09:16 +0200
Re: Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 03:51 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 12:06 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 15:49 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 20:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 16:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 19:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 21:38 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 08:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 22:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-05-31 19:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-31 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 03:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 08:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 11:59 -0700
Re: â Snowflake â Slaughtering concert goers. â Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 14:07 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 18:50 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:00 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:29 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:47 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:18 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 09:14 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:48 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:28 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:14 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: â Snowflake â ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? â Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-02 08:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 12:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 04:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:12 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:14 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:19 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:54 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
The Supreme Court got it wrong. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:51 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:59 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:25 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:28 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:08 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 23:24 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:12 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:48 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:00 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:32 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:49 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:45 -0700
Permission to breath ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:13 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Earle Jones <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2018-06-02 20:36 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:53 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 23:33 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:42 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:57 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:08 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Clarity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-03 08:52 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:46 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:53 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 22:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 23:19 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 09:10 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:31 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:12 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:26 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:10 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 22:19 -0500
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 00:24 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 05:43 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 07:17 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 16:07 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:30 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 01:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:34 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:50 -0700
"Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 19:02 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:49 -0700
Depressed Losers, slaughtering consert goers, is "natural" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 02:18 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:25 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:16 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-02 01:20 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-03 20:11 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 00:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:30 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 17:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 15:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-04 23:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:51 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:51 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:27 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 08:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:32 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:17 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 05:15 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:07 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 06:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:28 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:19 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:23 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 22:09 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:48 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:44 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-04 02:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 20:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:00 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:39 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 15:20 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-05 22:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 20:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:29 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:16 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 06:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:30 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:13 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:41 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 02:29 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:50 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:38 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 12:55 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-05 14:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 12:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 14:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-05 22:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:46 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:55 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-09 02:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 23:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 06:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:50 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 09:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 10:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-10 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 13:42 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 17:31 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 23:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Truth Avoidance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Truth Avoidance. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 21:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 18:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 17:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 02:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-07 05:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 22:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 11:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:17 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:36 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:29 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 11:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 14:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:12 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:59 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 19:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 20:21 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:58 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500
Re: Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! Dave Zeeman <arougroutinette@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 09:06 -0700
Page 14 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 29 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 17:27 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <49iRC.212678$o43.21421@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #688487 |
On 6/3/2018 2:02 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 4:01 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:03 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something >>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different >>>>>>>>> commas >>>>>>>>> and capitalization. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>>>> >>>>>> Correct. >>>>>> >>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get >>>>> to a >>>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>>> broader point? >>>> >>>> No, you're not even close. >>>> >>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>> >>> >>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >> >> That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. >> > Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! > > Thanks! > Works for you Mr. NRA hate-speech.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 15:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnltraFa43hU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688737 |
On 6/4/18 2:27 PM, benj wrote: > On 6/3/2018 2:02 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/3/18 4:01 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:03 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something >>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with >>>>>>>>>> different commas >>>>>>>>>> and capitalization. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Correct. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get >>>>>> to a >>>>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they >>>>>> have >>>>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>>>> broader point? >>>>> >>>>> No, you're not even close. >>>>> >>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>> >>> That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. >>> >> Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! >> >> Thanks! >> > Works for you Mr. NRA hate-speech. I do not even understand what you mean by that name calling, other than the obvious that you want to feel better about yourself by insulting others. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 23:47 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <pf520n$j7c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688296 |
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote in message news:rfl5hd5lpeptstffvnd3u9jhngdjc4tjd3@4ax.com... > On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >>On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>> >>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>> >>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>> >>And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>and capitalization. > > Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? Or for that how many do not say "the right of the people"???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnmhb6Fd8cdU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688804 |
Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: > > > "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote in message > news:rfl5hd5lpeptstffvnd3u9jhngdjc4tjd3@4ax.com... >> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>> >>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>> >>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>> >>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>> and capitalization. >> >> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? > > Or for that how many do not say "the right of the people"??? > > > Look at the WHOLE sentence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 23:51 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <qf5chd9qu8ti4834aacu31oons14c5bn0a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688813 |
x-no-idiots: yes On 5 Jun 2018 04:19:51 GMT, in talk.politics.guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Look at the WHOLE sentence. Therein lies the problem: the second amendment is a 27-word sentence with a single clause. The first 13-word noun phrase is damned inconvenient; therefore, it tends to get truncated. I always say that I support the 27-word version of 2A, not the 14-word one. Jones -- Quod si non verum est, non dicere est.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnmns5Fecg6U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688835 |
!Jones <jones@fobahor.com> wrote: > x-no-idiots: yes > > On 5 Jun 2018 04:19:51 GMT, in talk.politics.guns Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> Look at the WHOLE sentence. > > Therein lies the problem: the second amendment is a 27-word sentence > with a single clause. The first 13-word noun phrase is damned > inconvenient; therefore, it tends to get truncated. > > I always say that I support the 27-word version of 2A, not the 14-word > one. > > Jones > > -- > Quod si non verum est, non dicere est. > Love it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 07:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <pf67n4$h8h$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688844 |
In news:fnmns5Fecg6U3@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> wrote: >> On 5 Jun 2018 04:19:51 GMT, in talk.politics.guns Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> Look at the WHOLE sentence. >> Therein lies the problem: the second amendment is a 27-word sentence >> with a single clause. The first 13-word noun phrase is damned >> inconvenient; therefore, it tends to get truncated. >> I always say that I support the 27-word version of 2A, not the >> 14-word one. > Love it. Then you girls should understand what you support. I've provided this link before and, as before, I expect Jones to ignore it. We'll see if Snit ignores it, too. http://www.grifent.com/docsLinks/docs/2ndEnglishLesson/SecondAmedEnglishLesson.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 08:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnnn7sFbpqgU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688886 |
On 6/5/18 7:19 AM, max headroom wrote:
> In news:fnmns5Fecg6U3@mid.individual.net,
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed:
>
>> !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> wrote:
>>> On 5 Jun 2018 04:19:51 GMT, in talk.politics.guns Snit
>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Look at the WHOLE sentence.
>
>>> Therein lies the problem: the second amendment is a 27-word sentence
>>> with a single clause. The first 13-word noun phrase is damned
>>> inconvenient; therefore, it tends to get truncated.
>
>>> I always say that I support the 27-word version of 2A, not the
>>> 14-word one.
>
>> Love it.
>
> Then you girls should understand what you support.
The fact you use "girls" as an insult, which you clearly are, speaks
poorly of you.
> I've provided this link before and, as before, I expect Jones to ignore it. We'll see if Snit
> ignores it, too.
>
> http://www.grifent.com/docsLinks/docs/2ndEnglishLesson/SecondAmedEnglishLesson.html
Interesting analogy:
Books, it is claimed, are a requirement for a well-schooled electorate,
and thus those people referenced (the electorate... ALL citizens) should
have the right to books.
Arms, it is claimed, are a requirement for a well-regulated militia, and
this those people referenced (the militia... a subset of citizens)
should have the right to arms.
Interesting analogy which makes it VERY clear that the new
interpretation of the second amendment is not an accurate one. Thank you.
A better analogy to the second amendment might be:
A well informed group of scholars, being necessary to the
education of a free State, the right of the people to keep
and support libraries shall not be infringed.
It does not imply that anyone and everyone should be able to have a
library in their home, nor even that everyone should have access to a
library card.
To be clear: I would NEVER want to see such a law / amendment pass! But
that is a much better, though admittedly not perfect, analogy of the
type that page tries to push.
Thanks for posting that!
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 09:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <pf6ej4$2ll$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688890 |
In news:fnnn7sFbpqgU4@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/5/18 7:19 AM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fnmns5Fecg6U3@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> wrote: >>>> On 5 Jun 2018 04:19:51 GMT, in talk.politics.guns Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> Look at the WHOLE sentence. >>>> Therein lies the problem: the second amendment is a 27-word >>>> sentence with a single clause. The first 13-word noun phrase is >>>> damned inconvenient; therefore, it tends to get truncated. >>>> I always say that I support the 27-word version of 2A, not the >>>> 14-word one. >>> Love it. >> Then you girls should understand what you support. > The fact you use "girls" as an insult, which you clearly are, speaks > poorly of you. We'll add misogyny to your traits. >> I've provided this link before and, as before, I expect Jones to >> ignore it. We'll see if Snit ignores it, too. >> http://www.grifent.com/docsLinks/docs/2ndEnglishLesson/SecondAmedEnglishLesson.html > Interesting analogy: > Books, it is claimed, are a requirement for a well-schooled electorate, > and thus those people referenced (the electorate... ALL citizens) should > have the right to books. Wow! How did you go so wrong so fast? "A well-schooled electorate, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and read Books, shall not be infringed." "I asked: can the sentence be interpreted to restrict the right to keep and read books to a well schooled electorate..... "He said, 'No.'" > Arms, it is claimed, are a requirement for a well-regulated militia, and > this those people referenced (the militia... a subset of citizens) > should have the right to arms. > Interesting analogy which makes it VERY clear that the new > interpretation of the second amendment is not an accurate one. Thank > you. Your reading comprehension sucks. > A better analogy to the second amendment might be: > A well informed group of scholars, being necessary to the > education of a free State,... False assumption. > ... the right of the people to keep and support libraries shall not be infringed. Another false assumption. One cannot "bear" a library (unless it's a personal collection of books capable of being transported by one person). "Support" is in no way analogous to "bear." You're equating the right to keep and bear arms to the right to keep and support an armory, and implying the armory is owned by the community. > It does not imply that anyone and everyone should be able to have a > library in their home,... Actually, it does. One cannot "keep" a library if one does not possess it. > ... nor even that everyone should have access to a library card. A library card isn't necessary to access one's library. > To be clear: I would NEVER want to see such a law / amendment pass! > But that is a much better, though admittedly not perfect, analogy of the > type that page tries to push. It's a piss-poor analogy. > Thanks for posting that! Always happy to advance another's education.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 16:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnntd8Flhn3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688897 |
max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: > In news:fnnn7sFbpqgU4@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/5/18 7:19 AM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fnmns5Fecg6U3@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> wrote: >>>>> On 5 Jun 2018 04:19:51 GMT, in talk.politics.guns Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Look at the WHOLE sentence. > >>>>> Therein lies the problem: the second amendment is a 27-word >>>>> sentence with a single clause. The first 13-word noun phrase is >>>>> damned inconvenient; therefore, it tends to get truncated. > >>>>> I always say that I support the 27-word version of 2A, not the >>>>> 14-word one. > >>>> Love it. > >>> Then you girls should understand what you support. > >> The fact you use "girls" as an insult, which you clearly are, speaks >> poorly of you. > > We'll add misogyny to your traits. > >>> I've provided this link before and, as before, I expect Jones to >>> ignore it. We'll see if Snit ignores it, too. > >>> http://www.grifent.com/docsLinks/docs/2ndEnglishLesson/SecondAmedEnglishLesson.html > >> Interesting analogy: > >> Books, it is claimed, are a requirement for a well-schooled electorate, >> and thus those people referenced (the electorate... ALL citizens) should >> have the right to books. > > Wow! How did you go so wrong so fast? > > "A well-schooled electorate, being necessary to the security of a free > State, the right of the > people to keep and read Books, shall not be infringed." > > "I asked: can the sentence be interpreted to restrict the right to keep > and read books to a well > schooled electorate..... > > "He said, 'No.'" > >> Arms, it is claimed, are a requirement for a well-regulated militia, and >> this those people referenced (the militia... a subset of citizens) >> should have the right to arms. > >> Interesting analogy which makes it VERY clear that the new >> interpretation of the second amendment is not an accurate one. Thank >> you. > > Your reading comprehension sucks. > >> A better analogy to the second amendment might be: > >> A well informed group of scholars, being necessary to the >> education of a free State,... > > False assumption. > >> ... the right of the people to keep and support libraries shall not be infringed. > > Another false assumption. One cannot "bear" a library (unless it's a > personal collection of books > capable of being transported by one person). "Support" is in no way analogous to "bear." > > You're equating the right to keep and bear arms to the right to keep and > support an armory, and > implying the armory is owned by the community. > >> It does not imply that anyone and everyone should be able to have a >> library in their home,... > > Actually, it does. One cannot "keep" a library if one does not possess it. > >> ... nor even that everyone should have access to a library card. > > A library card isn't necessary to access one's library. > >> To be clear: I would NEVER want to see such a law / amendment pass! >> But that is a much better, though admittedly not perfect, analogy of the >> type that page tries to push. > > It's a piss-poor analogy. > >> Thanks for posting that! > > Always happy to advance another's education. > > > I note your misogyny and you try to twist it to be mine. Then you go right on twisting words and meanings. I will stick to the original meaning of the second amendment, not the new one pushed by activist judges in 2008 in a controversial 5:4 decision.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 13:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <pf6raf$mc$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688898 |
In news:fnntd8Flhn3U1@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: >> In news:fnnn7sFbpqgU4@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> On 6/5/18 7:19 AM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fnmns5Fecg6U3@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 5 Jun 2018 04:19:51 GMT, in talk.politics.guns Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Look at the WHOLE sentence. >>>>>> Therein lies the problem: the second amendment is a 27-word >>>>>> sentence with a single clause. The first 13-word noun phrase is >>>>>> damned inconvenient; therefore, it tends to get truncated. >>>>>> I always say that I support the 27-word version of 2A, not the >>>>>> 14-word one. >>>>> Love it. >>>> Then you girls should understand what you support. >>> The fact you use "girls" as an insult, which you clearly are, speaks >>> poorly of you. >> We'll add misogyny to your traits. >>>> I've provided this link before and, as before, I expect Jones to >>>> ignore it. We'll see if Snit ignores it, too. >>>> http://www.grifent.com/docsLinks/docs/2ndEnglishLesson/SecondAmedEnglishLesson.html >>> Interesting analogy: >>> Books, it is claimed, are a requirement for a well-schooled electorate, >>> and thus those people referenced (the electorate... ALL citizens) >>> should have the right to books. >> Wow! How did you go so wrong so fast? >> "A well-schooled electorate, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the >> people to keep and read Books, shall not be infringed." >> "I asked: can the sentence be interpreted to restrict the right to >> keep and read books to a well schooled electorate..... >> "He said, 'No.'" >>> Arms, it is claimed, are a requirement for a well-regulated militia, and >>> this those people referenced (the militia... a subset of citizens) >>> should have the right to arms. >>> Interesting analogy which makes it VERY clear that the new >>> interpretation of the second amendment is not an accurate one. Thank >>> you. >> Your reading comprehension sucks. >>> A better analogy to the second amendment might be: >>> A well informed group of scholars, being necessary to the >>> education of a free State,... >> False assumption. >>> ... the right of the people to keep and support libraries shall not >>> be infringed. >> Another false assumption. One cannot "bear" a library (unless it's a personal collection of books >> capable of being transported by one person). "Support" is in no way analogous to "bear." >> You're equating the right to keep and bear arms to the right to keep and >> support an armory, and implying the armory is owned by the community. >>> It does not imply that anyone and everyone should be able to have a >>> library in their home,... >> Actually, it does. One cannot "keep" a library if one does not >> possess it. >>> ... nor even that everyone should have access to a library card. >> A library card isn't necessary to access one's library. >>> To be clear: I would NEVER want to see such a law / amendment pass! >>> But that is a much better, though admittedly not perfect, analogy of the >>> type that page tries to push. >> It's a piss-poor analogy. >>> Thanks for posting that! >> Always happy to advance another's education. > I note your misogyny... Hey, I LOVE women! > ... and you try to twist it to be mine. You're the one who took it as an insult. It's responses such as that and your and Jones' habits of ignoring contradicting evidence that leads me to conclude you're both thinking with your ovaries and not your brains. > Then you go right on twisting words and meanings. Actually, that would be you, from start to finish. You began with one narrow meaning of the phrase "bear arms" and tried to argue that it was the ONLY relevant meaning of the phrase. Now you are twisting the words of grammarians to conform to your view. > I will stick to the original meaning of the second amendment,... I'm glad you've seen the light. That puts you in agreement with most of the subscribers to t.p.g. > ... not the new one pushed by activist judges in 2008 in a controversial 5:4 decision. Nah, the "states' right" judges started well before then. Good thing the Supreme Court straightened them out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 14:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnoeshFbpqgU10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688938 |
On 6/5/18 1:18 PM, max headroom wrote: ... >> I note your misogyny... > > Hey, I LOVE women! Irrelevant to your misogynistic insult. >> ... and you try to twist it to be mine. > > You're the one who took it as an insult. Again, you can work to twist words (you do that a lot... with this, with the second amendment, and more) but YOU are the one who referred to people in the feminine AS an insult. Own your own actions. > It's responses such as that and your and Jones' habits of > ignoring contradicting evidence that leads me to conclude you're both thinking with your ovaries and > not your brains. Ah, more misogynistic nonsense from you AND empty accusations. >> Then you go right on twisting words and meanings. > > Actually, that would be you, from start to finish. You began with one narrow meaning of the phrase > "bear arms" "Narrowing" it to how the term is (or at least was) used. Yeah... I am going with the actual meaning. How dare I! > and tried to argue that it was the ONLY relevant meaning of the phrase. I am open to you showing examples where it was used otherwise at the time of the founding. > Now you are > twisting the words of grammarians to conform to your view. You want to push that the new meaning of the second amendment, pushed by activist judges in a controversial 5:4 decision, was also used at the time of the founding. So show where the term "bear arms" was used that way. I am open to it. Do you have ANY examples? Any at all? >> I will stick to the original meaning of the second amendment,... > > I'm glad you've seen the light. That puts you in agreement with most of the subscribers to t.p.g. > >> ... not the new one pushed by activist judges in 2008 in a controversial 5:4 decision. > > Nah, the "states' right" judges started well before then. Good thing the Supreme Court straightened > them out. I am open to you showing support. Of note, you repeatedly fail to show "bear arms" being used as you claim it was. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <pf76s3$75a$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688955 |
In news:fnoeshFbpqgU10@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/5/18 1:18 PM, max headroom wrote: > ... >>> I note your misogyny... >> Hey, I LOVE women! > Irrelevant to your misogynistic insult. >>> ... and you try to twist it to be mine. >> You're the one who took it as an insult. > Again, you can work to twist words (you do that a lot... with this, with > the second amendment, and more) but YOU are the one who referred to > people in the feminine AS an insult. The words which you conveniently snipped away... which prove you the liar. > Own your own actions. >> It's responses such as that and your and Jones' habits of >> ignoring contradicting evidence that leads me to conclude you're >> both thinking with your ovaries and not your brains. > Ah, more misogynistic nonsense from you AND empty accusations. I call 'em as I see 'em. If you're going to argue like a woman, I'll note it. >>> Then you go right on twisting words and meanings. >> Actually, that would be you, from start to finish. You began with >> one narrow meaning of the phrase "bear arms" > "Narrowing" it to how the term is (or at least was) used. Yeah... I am > going with the actual meaning. How dare I! Not "the" actual meaning, but "one" actual meaning. On that foundation of sand you built your house. >> and tried to argue that it was the ONLY relevant meaning of the phrase. > I am open to you showing examples where it was used otherwise at the > time of the founding. Done and done. >> Now you are twisting the words of grammarians to conform to your view. > You want to push that the new meaning of the second amendment, pushed > by activist judges in a controversial 5:4 decision, was also used at the > time of the founding. It's not a new meaning. It was, is, and will be the true meaning. > So show where the term "bear arms" was used that way. I am open to it. > Do you have ANY examples? Any at all? Done and done. However, it's irrelevant. The correct phrase is "keep and bear arms," and that you can't deny. >>> I will stick to the original meaning of the second amendment,... >> I'm glad you've seen the light. That puts you in agreement with most >> of the subscribers to t.p.g. >>> ... not the new one pushed by activist judges in 2008 in a >>> controversial 5:4 decision. >> Nah, the "states' right" judges started well before then. Good thing >> the Supreme Court straightened them out. > I am open to you showing support. Of note, you repeatedly fail to show > "bear arms" being used as you claim it was. Been there, done that, and you refused to acknowledge the examples.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 17:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnon2jFqc8mU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688999 |
On 6/5/18 4:33 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fnoeshFbpqgU10@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/5/18 1:18 PM, max headroom wrote: > >> ... >>>> I note your misogyny... > >>> Hey, I LOVE women! > >> Irrelevant to your misogynistic insult. > >>>> ... and you try to twist it to be mine. > >>> You're the one who took it as an insult. > >> Again, you can work to twist words (you do that a lot... with this, with >> the second amendment, and more) but YOU are the one who referred to >> people in the feminine AS an insult. > > The words which you conveniently snipped away... which prove you the liar. > >> Own your own actions. > >>> It's responses such as that and your and Jones' habits of >>> ignoring contradicting evidence that leads me to conclude you're >>> both thinking with your ovaries and not your brains. > >> Ah, more misogynistic nonsense from you AND empty accusations. > > I call 'em as I see 'em. If you're going to argue like a woman, I'll note it. > >>>> Then you go right on twisting words and meanings. > >>> Actually, that would be you, from start to finish. You began with >>> one narrow meaning of the phrase "bear arms" > >> "Narrowing" it to how the term is (or at least was) used. Yeah... I am >> going with the actual meaning. How dare I! > > Not "the" actual meaning, but "one" actual meaning. On that foundation of sand you built your house. > >>> and tried to argue that it was the ONLY relevant meaning of the phrase. > >> I am open to you showing examples where it was used otherwise at the >> time of the founding. > > Done and done. > >>> Now you are twisting the words of grammarians to conform to your view. > >> You want to push that the new meaning of the second amendment, pushed >> by activist judges in a controversial 5:4 decision, was also used at the >> time of the founding. > > It's not a new meaning. It was, is, and will be the true meaning. > >> So show where the term "bear arms" was used that way. I am open to it. >> Do you have ANY examples? Any at all? > > Done and done. However, it's irrelevant. > > The correct phrase is "keep and bear arms," and that you can't deny. > >>>> I will stick to the original meaning of the second amendment,... > >>> I'm glad you've seen the light. That puts you in agreement with most >>> of the subscribers to t.p.g. > >>>> ... not the new one pushed by activist judges in 2008 in a >>>> controversial 5:4 decision. > >>> Nah, the "states' right" judges started well before then. Good thing >>> the Supreme Court straightened them out. > >> I am open to you showing support. Of note, you repeatedly fail to show >> "bear arms" being used as you claim it was. > > Been there, done that, and you refused to acknowledge the examples. > > More misogynistic nonsense from you, empty accusations, unsupported claims that YOUR view must be right, and more failure on your part to show where the founders used the term "bear arms" in a way contrary to what I have shown. Bottom line: you have certainty with no support, I have support with no certainty. I am open to contrary information where you are close minded. Fair enough. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 17:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <pf7ahm$rj1$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #689012 |
In news:fnon2jFqc8mU1@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/5/18 4:33 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fnoeshFbpqgU10@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> On 6/5/18 1:18 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> ... >>>>> I note your misogyny... >>>> Hey, I LOVE women! >>> Irrelevant to your misogynistic insult. >>>>> ... and you try to twist it to be mine. >>>> You're the one who took it as an insult. >>> Again, you can work to twist words (you do that a lot... with this, >>> with the second amendment, and more) but YOU are the one who >>> referred to people in the feminine AS an insult. >> The words which you conveniently snipped away... which prove you the >> liar. >>> Own your own actions. >>>> It's responses such as that and your and Jones' habits of >>>> ignoring contradicting evidence that leads me to conclude you're >>>> both thinking with your ovaries and not your brains. >>> Ah, more misogynistic nonsense from you AND empty accusations. >> I call 'em as I see 'em. If you're going to argue like a woman, I'll >> note it. >>>>> Then you go right on twisting words and meanings. >>>> Actually, that would be you, from start to finish. You began with >>>> one narrow meaning of the phrase "bear arms" >>> "Narrowing" it to how the term is (or at least was) used. Yeah... I >>> am going with the actual meaning. How dare I! >> Not "the" actual meaning, but "one" actual meaning. On that >> foundation of sand you built your house. >>>> and tried to argue that it was the ONLY relevant meaning of the >>>> phrase. >>> I am open to you showing examples where it was used otherwise at the >>> time of the founding. >> Done and done. >>>> Now you are twisting the words of grammarians to conform to your >>>> view. >>> You want to push that the new meaning of the second amendment, >>> pushed by activist judges in a controversial 5:4 decision, was also >>> used at the time of the founding. >> It's not a new meaning. It was, is, and will be the true meaning. >>> So show where the term "bear arms" was used that way. I am open to >>> it. Do you have ANY examples? Any at all? >> Done and done. However, it's irrelevant. >> The correct phrase is "keep and bear arms," and that you can't deny. >>>>> I will stick to the original meaning of the second amendment,... >>>> I'm glad you've seen the light. That puts you in agreement with >>>> most of the subscribers to t.p.g. >>>>> ... not the new one pushed by activist judges in 2008 in a >>>>> controversial 5:4 decision. >>>> Nah, the "states' right" judges started well before then. Good >>>> thing the Supreme Court straightened them out. >>> I am open to you showing support. Of note, you repeatedly fail to >>> show "bear arms" being used as you claim it was. >> Been there, done that, and you refused to acknowledge the examples. > More misogynistic nonsense from you, empty accusations, unsupported > claims that YOUR view must be right, and more failure on your part to > show where the founders used the term "bear arms" in a way contrary to > what I have shown. Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, and more bullshit. The correct phrase is "keep and bear arms."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 18:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnoq9rFbpqgU29@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689023 |
On 6/5/18 5:32 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> Been there, done that, and you refused to acknowledge the examples. >> More misogynistic nonsense from you, empty accusations, unsupported >> claims that YOUR view must be right, and more failure on your part to >> show where the founders used the term "bear arms" in a way contrary to >> what I have shown. > Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, and more bullshit. > > The correct phrase is "keep and bear arms." Ah, then show where and how THAT phrase was used in other texts. Oh. You were just changing topics because you have no honest response. OK. I will just go back to the topic: * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed action". * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of the country which were never, as far as I can find, challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it a hard sale to say they were against the second amendment. * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun laws. * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on arms... what one could call "infringements". * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything else that is tied to death and injuries. * I back evidence-based policies. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 22:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <pf7sku$935$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #689037 |
In news:fnoq9rFbpqgU29@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/5/18 5:32 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> Been there, done that, and you refused to acknowledge the examples. >>> More misogynistic nonsense from you, empty accusations, unsupported >>> claims that YOUR view must be right, and more failure on your part >>> to show where the founders used the term "bear arms" in a way >>> contrary to what I have shown. >> Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, and more bullshit. >> The correct phrase is "keep and bear arms." > Ah, then show where and how THAT phrase was used in other texts. Oh, my. Are you going to claim that *that* also has a military meaning?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnqbhmF560lU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689125 |
max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: > In news:fnoq9rFbpqgU29@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/5/18 5:32 PM, max headroom wrote: > >>>>> Been there, done that, and you refused to acknowledge the examples. > >>>> More misogynistic nonsense from you, empty accusations, unsupported >>>> claims that YOUR view must be right, and more failure on your part >>>> to show where the founders used the term "bear arms" in a way >>>> contrary to what I have shown. > >>> Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, and more bullshit. > >>> The correct phrase is "keep and bear arms." > >> Ah, then show where and how THAT phrase was used in other texts. > > Oh, my. Are you going to claim that *that* also has a military meaning? > > > I am asking you to show how the phrase you focused on was used. Give examples.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <bb41j4.365.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #689023 |
On 2018-06-05 5:32 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fnon2jFqc8mU1@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/5/18 4:33 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fnoeshFbpqgU10@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> On 6/5/18 1:18 PM, max headroom wrote: > >>>> ... >>>>>> I note your misogyny... > >>>>> Hey, I LOVE women! > >>>> Irrelevant to your misogynistic insult. > >>>>>> ... and you try to twist it to be mine. > >>>>> You're the one who took it as an insult. > >>>> Again, you can work to twist words (you do that a lot... with this, >>>> with the second amendment, and more) but YOU are the one who >>>> referred to people in the feminine AS an insult. > >>> The words which you conveniently snipped away... which prove you the >>> liar. > >>>> Own your own actions. > >>>>> It's responses such as that and your and Jones' habits of >>>>> ignoring contradicting evidence that leads me to conclude you're >>>>> both thinking with your ovaries and not your brains. > >>>> Ah, more misogynistic nonsense from you AND empty accusations. > >>> I call 'em as I see 'em. If you're going to argue like a woman, I'll >>> note it. > >>>>>> Then you go right on twisting words and meanings. > >>>>> Actually, that would be you, from start to finish. You began with >>>>> one narrow meaning of the phrase "bear arms" > >>>> "Narrowing" it to how the term is (or at least was) used. Yeah... I >>>> am going with the actual meaning. How dare I! > >>> Not "the" actual meaning, but "one" actual meaning. On that >>> foundation of sand you built your house. > >>>>> and tried to argue that it was the ONLY relevant meaning of the >>>>> phrase. > >>>> I am open to you showing examples where it was used otherwise at the >>>> time of the founding. > >>> Done and done. > >>>>> Now you are twisting the words of grammarians to conform to your >>>>> view. > >>>> You want to push that the new meaning of the second amendment, >>>> pushed by activist judges in a controversial 5:4 decision, was also >>>> used at the time of the founding. > >>> It's not a new meaning. It was, is, and will be the true meaning. > >>>> So show where the term "bear arms" was used that way. I am open to >>>> it. Do you have ANY examples? Any at all? > >>> Done and done. However, it's irrelevant. > >>> The correct phrase is "keep and bear arms," and that you can't deny. > >>>>>> I will stick to the original meaning of the second amendment,... > >>>>> I'm glad you've seen the light. That puts you in agreement with >>>>> most of the subscribers to t.p.g. > >>>>>> ... not the new one pushed by activist judges in 2008 in a >>>>>> controversial 5:4 decision. > >>>>> Nah, the "states' right" judges started well before then. Good >>>>> thing the Supreme Court straightened them out. > >>>> I am open to you showing support. Of note, you repeatedly fail to >>>> show "bear arms" being used as you claim it was. > >>> Been there, done that, and you refused to acknowledge the examples. > >> More misogynistic nonsense from you, empty accusations, unsupported >> claims that YOUR view must be right, and more failure on your part to >> show where the founders used the term "bear arms" in a way contrary to >> what I have shown. > > Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, and more bullshit. > > The correct phrase is "keep and bear arms." > > its not arms its alms
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnoqkoFbpqgU34@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689040 |
On 6/5/18 6:06 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-05 5:32 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fnon2jFqc8mU1@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >> >>> On 6/5/18 4:33 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fnoeshFbpqgU10@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> On 6/5/18 1:18 PM, max headroom wrote: >> >>>>> ... >>>>>>> I note your misogyny... >> >>>>>> Hey, I LOVE women! >> >>>>> Irrelevant to your misogynistic insult. >> >>>>>>> ... and you try to twist it to be mine. >> >>>>>> You're the one who took it as an insult. >> >>>>> Again, you can work to twist words (you do that a lot... with this, >>>>> with the second amendment, and more) but YOU are the one who >>>>> referred to people in the feminine AS an insult. >> >>>> The words which you conveniently snipped away... which prove you the >>>> liar. >> >>>>> Own your own actions. >> >>>>>> It's responses such as that and your and Jones' habits of >>>>>> ignoring contradicting evidence that leads me to conclude you're >>>>>> both thinking with your ovaries and not your brains. >> >>>>> Ah, more misogynistic nonsense from you AND empty accusations. >> >>>> I call 'em as I see 'em. If you're going to argue like a woman, I'll >>>> note it. >> >>>>>>> Then you go right on twisting words and meanings. >> >>>>>> Actually, that would be you, from start to finish. You began with >>>>>> one narrow meaning of the phrase "bear arms" >> >>>>> "Narrowing" it to how the term is (or at least was) used. Yeah... I >>>>> am going with the actual meaning. How dare I! >> >>>> Not "the" actual meaning, but "one" actual meaning. On that >>>> foundation of sand you built your house. >> >>>>>> and tried to argue that it was the ONLY relevant meaning of the >>>>>> phrase. >> >>>>> I am open to you showing examples where it was used otherwise at the >>>>> time of the founding. >> >>>> Done and done. >> >>>>>> Now you are twisting the words of grammarians to conform to your >>>>>> view. >> >>>>> You want to push that the new meaning of the second amendment, >>>>> pushed by activist judges in a controversial 5:4 decision, was also >>>>> used at the time of the founding. >> >>>> It's not a new meaning. It was, is, and will be the true meaning. >> >>>>> So show where the term "bear arms" was used that way. I am open to >>>>> it. Do you have ANY examples? Any at all? >> >>>> Done and done. However, it's irrelevant. >> >>>> The correct phrase is "keep and bear arms," and that you can't deny. >> >>>>>>> I will stick to the original meaning of the second amendment,... >> >>>>>> I'm glad you've seen the light. That puts you in agreement with >>>>>> most of the subscribers to t.p.g. >> >>>>>>> ... not the new one pushed by activist judges in 2008 in a >>>>>>> controversial 5:4 decision. >> >>>>>> Nah, the "states' right" judges started well before then. Good >>>>>> thing the Supreme Court straightened them out. >> >>>>> I am open to you showing support. Of note, you repeatedly fail to >>>>> show "bear arms" being used as you claim it was. >> >>>> Been there, done that, and you refused to acknowledge the examples. >> >>> More misogynistic nonsense from you, empty accusations, unsupported >>> claims that YOUR view must be right, and more failure on your part to >>> show where the founders used the term "bear arms" in a way contrary to >>> what I have shown. >> >> Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, and more bullshit. >> >> The correct phrase is "keep and bear arms." >> >> > its not arms its alms :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 29 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web