Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #687921 > unrolled thread
| Started by | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 02:37 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-06-03 09:06 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 578 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 02:37 -0400
Re:Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-31 09:16 +0200
Re: Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 03:51 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 12:06 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 15:49 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 20:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 16:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 19:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 21:38 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 08:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 22:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-05-31 19:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-31 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 03:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 08:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 11:59 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Slaughtering concert goers. ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 14:07 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 18:50 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:00 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:29 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:47 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:18 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 09:14 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:48 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:28 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:14 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-02 08:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 12:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 04:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:12 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:14 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:19 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:54 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
The Supreme Court got it wrong. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:51 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:59 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:25 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:28 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:08 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 23:24 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:12 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:48 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:00 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:32 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:49 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:45 -0700
Permission to breath ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:13 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Earle Jones <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2018-06-02 20:36 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:53 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 23:33 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:42 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:57 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:08 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Clarity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-03 08:52 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:46 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:53 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 22:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 23:19 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 09:10 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:31 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:12 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:26 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:10 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 22:19 -0500
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 00:24 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 05:43 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 07:17 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 16:07 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:30 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 01:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:34 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:50 -0700
"Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 19:02 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:49 -0700
Depressed Losers, slaughtering consert goers, is "natural" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 02:18 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:25 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:16 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-02 01:20 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-03 20:11 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 00:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:30 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 17:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 15:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-04 23:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:51 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:51 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:27 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 08:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:32 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:17 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 05:15 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:07 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 06:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:28 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:19 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:23 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 22:09 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:48 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:44 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-04 02:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 20:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:00 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:39 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 15:20 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-05 22:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 20:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:29 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:16 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 06:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:30 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:13 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:41 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 02:29 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:50 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:38 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 12:55 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-05 14:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 12:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 14:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-05 22:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:46 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:55 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-09 02:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 23:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 06:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:50 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 09:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 10:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-10 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 13:42 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 17:31 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 23:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Truth Avoidance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Truth Avoidance. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 21:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 18:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 17:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 02:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-07 05:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 22:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 11:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:17 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:36 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:29 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 11:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 14:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:12 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:59 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 19:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 20:21 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:58 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500
Re: Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! Dave Zeeman <arougroutinette@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 09:06 -0700
Page 21 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 19 20 [21] 22 23 … 29 Next page →
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 11:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <u4ndhdh3e392269pvds4ht35lqa3kee0ff@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688891 |
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying teachers! Here's the liberal alternative: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 That's how dumb the leftists are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 14:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <pf6ni2$4bp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688917 |
Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >>Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying teachers! > > Here's the liberal alternative: > > https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 > > That's how dumb the leftists are. Maybe they are Quakers! :-D -- Q: Why don't lawyers go to the beach? A: The cats keep trying to bury them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 12:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688917 |
On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying teachers! > > Here's the liberal alternative: > > https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 > > That's how dumb the leftists are. > What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in class rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 13:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <pf6rad$mc$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688926 |
In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>> teachers! >> Here's the liberal alternative: >> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >> That's how dumb the leftists are. > What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in class > rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, would you rather have a baseball bat or a gun?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 14:45 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <fnoejnFbpqgU9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688937 |
On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>> teachers! > >>> Here's the liberal alternative: > >>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 > >>> That's how dumb the leftists are. > >> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in class >> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. > > If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, would you rather have a baseball > bat or a gun? > > I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 14:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #688954 |
On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >> >>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>> teachers! >> >>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >> >>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>> >> >>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >> >>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in class >>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >> >> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >> would you rather have a baseball >> bat or a gun? >> >> > I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will > surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you want > a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is likely to > lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. > no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 14:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <fnof99FbpqgU11@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688956 |
On 6/5/18 2:51 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> >>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>> teachers! >>> >>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>> >>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>> >>> >>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>> >>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in class >>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>> >>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>> would you rather have a baseball >>> bat or a gun? >>> >>> >> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you >> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is likely >> to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. >> > no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something Pretty much. And having one for "defense" increases your chance of getting shot. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 15:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <bb3mq1.mlq.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #688958 |
On 2018-06-05 2:56 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/5/18 2:51 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> >>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>> teachers! >>>> >>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>> >>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>> >>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in class >>>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>> >>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>> bat or a gun? >>>> >>>> >>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >>> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you >>> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is >>> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. >>> >> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something > > Pretty much. And having one for "defense" increases your chance of > getting shot. > i just said that
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 18:47 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <pf73v6$nuq$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688958 |
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message news:fnof99FbpqgU11@mid.individual.net... > On 6/5/18 2:51 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> >>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>> teachers! >>>> >>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>> >>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>> >>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>> >>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in class >>>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>> >>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, would >>>> you rather have a baseball >>>> bat or a gun? >>>> >>>> >>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >>> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you want >>> a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is likely to >>> lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. >>> >> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something > > Pretty much. And having one for "defense" increases your chance of getting > shot. Actually according to DoJ statistics, in general, your chances of being injured or killed drop drastically when you use a gun for self defense over any other method of self defense including compliance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 15:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <bb3pmh.bua.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #688981 |
On 2018-06-05 3:47 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message > news:fnof99FbpqgU11@mid.individual.net... >> On 6/5/18 2:51 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>>> teachers! >>>>> >>>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>>> >>>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>>> class >>>>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>>> >>>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>>> bat or a gun? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >>>> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you >>>> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is >>>> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. >>>> >>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >> >> Pretty much. And having one for "defense" increases your chance of >> getting shot. > > Actually according to DoJ statistics, in general, your chances of being > injured or killed drop drastically when you use a gun for self defense > over any other method of self defense including compliance. > > show me the documented text for this
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 22:44 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <pf7hpq$b3u$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #688983 |
On 6/5/2018 6:51 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-05 3:47 PM, Scout wrote: >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >> news:fnof99FbpqgU11@mid.individual.net... >>> On 6/5/18 2:51 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>>>> teachers! >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>>>> >>>>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>>>> class rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>>>> >>>>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>>>> bat or a gun? >>>>>> >>>>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it >>>>> will surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say >>>>> you want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is >>>>> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. >>>>> >>>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >>> >>> Pretty much. And having one for "defense" increases your chance of >>> getting shot. >> >> Actually according to DoJ statistics, in general, your chances of >> being injured or killed drop drastically when you use a gun for self >> defense over any other method of self defense including compliance. >> > show me the documented text for this Put some tuna on the keyboard and let the cat write it. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <fnomo3Fqa6rU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688981 |
On 6/5/18 3:47 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message > news:fnof99FbpqgU11@mid.individual.net... >> On 6/5/18 2:51 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>>> teachers! >>>>> >>>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>>> >>>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>>> class >>>>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>>> >>>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>>> bat or a gun? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >>>> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you >>>> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is >>>> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. >>>> >>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >> >> Pretty much. And having one for "defense" increases your chance of >> getting shot. > > Actually according to DoJ statistics, in general, your chances of being > injured or killed drop drastically when you use a gun for self defense > over any other method of self defense including compliance. > > Another twisting of words from you. I noted your chance of being shot AT ALL goes up. You moved topics to self defense. Hint: guns do not magically appear in a situation when defense might be needed and then disappear outside of such situations. If we look at the actual research it is easy to show support for the following: • Firearm laws are associated with reductions in homicide and suicide • Stand your ground laws are associated with a large increase in homicide • Guns being in a home have a stronger tie to homicide than does illegal drug use and physical fights • Measures to reduce children getting ahold of arms have worked • 44% of gun-owning parents say that have a loaded and easily accessible gun in the home • Removing rapid-firing firearms is associated with fewer homicides, mass shooting, and suicides • Gun violence is a very big health issue • Many incidents of gun violence are not reported • Gun owners reach out to their representatives more than others to share their views on gun. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 23:04 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <pf7jmr$5bd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #689009 |
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message news:fnomo3Fqa6rU1@mid.individual.net... > On 6/5/18 3:47 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >> news:fnof99FbpqgU11@mid.individual.net... >>> On 6/5/18 2:51 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>>>> teachers! >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>>>> >>>>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>>>> class >>>>>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>>>> >>>>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>>>> bat or a gun? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >>>>> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you >>>>> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is likely >>>>> to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. >>>>> >>>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >>> >>> Pretty much. And having one for "defense" increases your chance of >>> getting shot. >> >> Actually according to DoJ statistics, in general, your chances of being >> injured or killed drop drastically when you use a gun for self defense >> over any other method of self defense including compliance. >> >> > Another twisting of words from you. I noted your chance of being shot AT > ALL goes up. You moved topics to self defense. I don't see any cites for your claims, but even if shot AT....isn't that still far better than being SHOT? As I said, lower risk of injury or death....which I believe is the whole objective of self defense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <fnp3tlFbpqgU43@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689095 |
On 6/5/18 8:04 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message > news:fnomo3Fqa6rU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 6/5/18 3:47 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>> news:fnof99FbpqgU11@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 6/5/18 2:51 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>>>>> teachers! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>>>>> class >>>>>>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>>>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>>>>> bat or a gun? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it >>>>>> will surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to >>>>>> say you want a gun if someone else has one, but when your >>>>>> "solution" is likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a >>>>>> good solution. >>>>>> >>>>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >>>> >>>> Pretty much. And having one for "defense" increases your chance of >>>> getting shot. >>> >>> Actually according to DoJ statistics, in general, your chances of >>> being injured or killed drop drastically when you use a gun for self >>> defense over any other method of self defense including compliance. >>> >>> >> Another twisting of words from you. I noted your chance of being shot >> AT ALL goes up. You moved topics to self defense. > > I don't see any cites for your claims, but even if shot AT....isn't that > still far better than being SHOT? > > As I said, lower risk of injury or death....which I believe is the whole > objective of self defense. > > Again: you are playing the game of hand picking relatively rare occurrences (compared to times one is not in such a situation). You ignore the big picture and hand-pick specific situations where there is a benefit you want to push as being universal. It is dishonest of you. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <pf73v6$nuq$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688956 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net... > On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> >>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>> teachers! >>> >>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>> >>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>> >>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>> >>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in class >>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>> >>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, would >>> you rather have a baseball >>> bat or a gun? >>> >>> >> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you want a >> gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is likely to lead >> to more harm than good it is not a good solution. >> > no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something So self defense only works if you kill something?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 15:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <bb3pl0.bua.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #688980 |
On 2018-06-05 3:45 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net... >> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> >>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>> teachers! >>>> >>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>> >>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>> >>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in class >>>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>> >>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>> bat or a gun? >>>> >>>> >>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >>> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you >>> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is >>> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. >>> >> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something > > So self defense only works if you kill something? > > > why do you need to defend yourself what have you done wrong
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 17:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <fnompoFbpqgU25@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688982 |
On 6/5/18 3:50 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-05 3:45 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net... >>> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>>> teachers! >>>>> >>>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>>> >>>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>>> class >>>>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>>> >>>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>>> bat or a gun? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >>>> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you >>>> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is >>>> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. >>>> >>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >> >> So self defense only works if you kill something? >> >> >> > why do you need to defend yourself what have you done wrong There are cases where you need to defend yourself. But notice how Scout jumps repeatedly to those very rare cases and ignores the bigger picture. He is twisting context and meaning. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 17:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <bb3ud3.84b.17.14@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #689010 |
On 2018-06-05 5:05 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/5/18 3:50 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-06-05 3:45 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>>>> teachers! >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>>>> >>>>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>>>> class >>>>>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>>>> >>>>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>>>> bat or a gun? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it >>>>> will surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say >>>>> you want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is >>>>> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. >>>>> >>>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >>> >>> So self defense only works if you kill something? >>> >>> >>> >> why do you need to defend yourself what have you done wrong > > There are cases where you need to defend yourself. But notice how Scout > jumps repeatedly to those very rare cases and ignores the bigger > picture. He is twisting context and meaning. > i don't wanna talk about him i thought this was about something else
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 17:20 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <fnonm2FbpqgU27@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #689014 |
On 6/5/18 5:11 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-05 5:05 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/5/18 3:50 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-06-05 3:45 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>>>>> teachers! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>>>>> class >>>>>>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>>>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>>>>> bat or a gun? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it >>>>>> will surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to >>>>>> say you want a gun if someone else has one, but when your >>>>>> "solution" is likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a >>>>>> good solution. >>>>>> >>>>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >>>> >>>> So self defense only works if you kill something? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> why do you need to defend yourself what have you done wrong >> >> There are cases where you need to defend yourself. But notice how >> Scout jumps repeatedly to those very rare cases and ignores the bigger >> picture. He is twisting context and meaning. >> > i don't wanna talk about him i thought this was about something else The whole debate has gone on so long and with so many trying to twist things and change topics who knows what any of it is about any more. I will just stick with my view unless I see good contrary evidence. * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed action". * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of the country which were never, as far as I can find, challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it a hard sale to say they were against the second amendment. * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun laws. * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on arms... what one could call "infringements". * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything else that is tied to death and injuries. * I back evidence-based policies. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 22:42 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers. |
| Message-ID | <pf7igj$vlv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #689018 |
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message
news:fnonm2FbpqgU27@mid.individual.net...
> On 6/5/18 5:11 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-06-05 5:05 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 6/5/18 3:50 PM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2018-06-05 3:45 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net...
>>>>>> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote:
>>>>>>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net,
>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit
>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying
>>>>>>>>>>> teachers!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in
>>>>>>>>> class
>>>>>>>>> rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped,
>>>>>>>> would you rather have a baseball
>>>>>>>> bat or a gun?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will
>>>>>>> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you
>>>>>>> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is
>>>>>>> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something
>>>>>
>>>>> So self defense only works if you kill something?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> why do you need to defend yourself what have you done wrong
>>>
>>> There are cases where you need to defend yourself. But notice how Scout
>>> jumps repeatedly to those very rare cases and ignores the bigger
>>> picture. He is twisting context and meaning.
>>>
>> i don't wanna talk about him i thought this was about something else
>
> The whole debate has gone on so long and with so many trying to twist
> things and change topics who knows what any of it is about any more.
>
> I will just stick with my view unless I see good contrary evidence.
stand by for contrary evidence.....again.
> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much
> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed
> action".
"At the time of the founding, as now, to “bear” meant to “carry.” See
Johnson 161; Webster; T. Sheridan, A Complete Dictionary of the English
Language (1796); 2 Oxford English Dictionary 20 (2d ed. 1989) (hereinafter
Oxford). When used with “arms,” however, the term has a meaning that refers
to carrying for a particular purpose—confrontation. In Muscarello v. United
States, 524 U. S. 125 (1998) , in the course of analyzing the meaning of
“carries a firearm” in a federal criminal statute, Justice Ginsburg wrote
that “[s]urely a most familiar meaning is, as the Constitution’s Second
Amendment … indicate[s]: ‘wear, bear, or carry … upon the person or in the
clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose … of being armed and ready for
offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.’ ”
Id., at 143 (dissenting opinion) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 214 (6th
ed. 1998)). We think that Justice Ginsburg accurately captured the natural
meaning of “bear arms.” Although the phrase implies that the carrying of the
weapon is for the purpose of “offensive or defensive action,” it in no way
connotes participation in a structured military organization."
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER (No. 07-290)
478 F. 3d 370, affirmed.
>
> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of
> the country which were never, as far as I can find,
> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it
> a hard sale to say they were against the second
> amendment.
I have not seen any law in existence which impacted either the keeping of
arms or the bearing of arms by the federal government until into the 20th
Century.
It should be noted that state and local laws of this nature may have existed
but since BOR was a restraint on the federal government rather than state or
local governments, and specifically the 2nd Amendment was not such a
restraint until the 14th Amendment incorporation in McDonald vs. City of
Chicago.
As such the existence of such laws in lower levels of government would not
support any contention that such laws were permissible under the 2nd
Amendment had it applied to such levels of government. I would note that
similar violations of the other portions of the BOR occurred and was a
fundamental reason for the ratification of the 14th Amendment to apply the
protection of such rights to all levels of government once such protection
was incorporated by SCOTUS as was done with the 2nd in 2010.
Therefore this argument proves nothing about the extent of the protections
afforded by the 2nd Amendment and what would have been seen as permissible
or objectionable if done by the federal government in the time period around
the time of ratification.
But again let's defer to the relevant experts.
" We now address how the Second Amendment was interpreted from immediately
after its ratification through the end of the 19th century. Before
proceeding, however, we take issue with Justice Stevens’ equating of these
sources with postenactment legislative history, a comparison that betrays a
fundamental misunderstanding of a court’s interpretive task. See post, at
27, n. 28. “Legislative history,” of course, refers to the pre-enactment
statements of those who drafted or voted for a law; it is considered
persuasive by some, not because they reflect the general understanding of
the disputed terms, but because the legislators who heard or read those
statements presumably voted with that understanding. Ibid. “Postenactment
legislative history,” ibid., a deprecatory contradiction in terms, refers to
statements of those who drafted or voted for the law that are made after its
enactment and hence could have had no effect on the congressional vote. It
most certainly does not refer to the examination of a variety of legal and
other sources to determine the public understanding of a legal text in the
period after its enactment or ratification. That sort of inquiry is a
critical tool of constitutional interpretation. As we will show, virtually
all interpreters of the Second Amendment in the century after its enactment
interpreted the amendment as we do."
(Ibid)
>
> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported
> the states rights view.
I suspect that's because of your bias towards looking at scholars who say
what you want to hear.
But let's see what the scholars who matter think.
" The 19th-century cases that interpreted the Second Amendment universally
support an individual right unconnected to militia service. In Houston v.
Moore, 5 Wheat. 1, 24 (1820), this Court held that States have concurrent
power over the militia, at least where not pre-empted by Congress. Agreeing
in dissent that States could “organize, discipline, and arm” the militia in
the absence of conflicting federal regulation, Justice Story said that the
Second Amendment “may not, perhaps, be thought to have any important bearing
on this point. If it have, it confirms and illustrates, rather than impugns
the reasoning already suggested.” Id., at 51–53. Of course, if the Amendment
simply “protect[ed] the right of the people of each of the several States to
maintain a well-regulated militia,” post, at 1 (Stevens, J., dissenting), it
would have enormous and obvious bearing on the point. But the Court and
Story derived the States’ power over the militia from the nonexclusive
nature of federal power, not from the Second Amendment , whose preamble
merely “confirms and illustrates” the importance of the militia. Even
clearer was Justice Baldwin. In the famous fugitive-slave case of Johnson v.
Tompkins, 13 F. Cas. 840, 850, 852 (CC Pa. 1833), Baldwin, sitting as a
circuit judge, cited both the Second Amendment and the Pennsylvania analogue
for his conclusion that a citizen has “a right to carry arms in defence of
his property or person, and to use them, if either were assailed with such
force, numbers or violence as made it necessary for the protection or safety
of either.”
Many early 19th-century state cases indicated that the Second Amendment
right to bear arms was an individual right unconnected to militia service,
though subject to certain restrictions. A Virginia case in 1824 holding that
the Constitution did not extend to free blacks explained that “numerous
restrictions imposed on [blacks] in our Statute Book, many of which are
inconsistent with the letter and spirit of the Constitution, both of this
State and of the United States as respects the free whites, demonstrate,
that, here, those instruments have not been considered to extend equally to
both classes of our population. We will only instance the restriction upon
the migration of free blacks into this State, and upon their right to bear
arms.” Aldridge v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. Cas. 447, 449 (Gen. Ct.). The claim
was obviously not that blacks were prevented from carrying guns in the
militia.21 See also Waters v. State, 1Gill 302, 309 (Md. 1843) (because free
blacks were treated as a “dangerous population,” “laws have been passed to
prevent their migration into this State; to make it unlawful for them to
bear arms; to guard even their religious assemblages with peculiar
watchfulness”). An 1829 decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan said: “The
constitution of the United States also grants to the citizen the right to
keep and bear arms. But the grant of this privilege cannot be construed into
the right in him who keeps a gun to destroy his neighbor. No rights are
intended to be granted by the constitution for an unlawful or unjustifiable
purpose.” United States v. Sheldon, in 5 Transactions of the Supreme Court
of the Territory of Michigan 337, 346 (W. Blume ed. 1940) (hereinafter
Blume). It is not possible to read this as discussing anything other than an
individual right unconnected to militia service. If it did have to do with
militia service, the limitation upon it would not be any “unlawful or
unjustifiable purpose,” but any nonmilitary purpose whatsoever.
In Nunn v. State, 1Ga. 243, 251 (1846), the Georgia Supreme Court
construed the Second Amendment as protecting the “natural right of
self-defence” and therefore struck down a ban on carrying pistols openly.
Its opinion perfectly captured the way in which the operative clause of the
Second Amendment furthers the purpose announced in the prefatory clause, in
continuity with the English right:
“The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not
militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such
merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or
broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end
to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so
vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is, that any
law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which
contravenes this right, originally belonging to our forefathers, trampled
under foot by Charles I. and his two wicked sons and successors,
re-established by the revolution of 1688, conveyed to this land of liberty
by the colonists, and finally incorporated conspicuously in our own Magna
Charta!”
Likewise, in State v. Chandler, 5La. Ann. 489, 490 (1850), the Louisiana
Supreme Court held that citizens had a right to carry arms openly: “This is
the right guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, and which is
calculated to incite men to a manly and noble defence of themselves, if
necessary, and of their country, without any tendency to secret advantages
and unmanly assassinations.”
Those who believe that the Second Amendment preserves only a
militia-centered right place great reliance on the Tennessee Supreme Court’s
1840 decision in Aymette v. State, 21 Tenn. 154. The case does not stand for
that broad proposition; in fact, the case does not mention the word
“militia” at all, except in its quoting of the Second Amendment . Aymette
held that the state constitutional guarantee of the right to “bear” arms did
not prohibit the banning of concealed weapons. The opinion first recognized
that both the state right and the federal right were descendents of the 1689
English right, but (erroneously, and contrary to virtually all other
authorities) read that right to refer only to “protect[ion of] the public
liberty” and “keep[ing] in awe those in power,” id., at 158. The court then
adopted a sort of middle position, whereby citizens were permitted to carry
arms openly, unconnected with any service in a formal militia, but were
given the right to use them only for the military purpose of banding
together to oppose tyranny. This odd reading of the right is, to be sure,
not the one we adopt—but it is not petitioners’ reading either. More
importantly, seven years earlier the Tennessee Supreme Court had treated the
state constitutional provision as conferring a right “of all the free
citizens of the State to keep and bear arms for their defence,” Simpson, 5
Yer., at 360; and 21 years later the court held that the “keep” portion of
the state constitutional right included the right to personal self-defense:
“[T]he right to keep arms involves, necessarily, the right to use such arms
for all the ordinary purposes, and in all the ordinary modes usual in the
country, and to which arms are adapted, limited by the duties of a good
citizen in times of peace.” Andrews, 50 Tenn., at 178; see also ibid.
(equating state provision with Second Amendment )."
(Ibid)
>
> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from
> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun
> laws.
The NRA has no control over our laws. They can not introduce, debate, amend
or even vote on any legislation. They are not an elected representative to
any position in any level of government.
Further I would note that per your own arguments we shouldn't allow the
antigun groups to do so either since they similarly benefit from mass
shootings and terrorism.
>
> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on
> arms... what one could call "infringements".
Yes, and SCOTUS has been in the process of tearing down these infringements
since DC vs. Heller and McDonald vs City of Chicago.
> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as
> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything
> else that is tied to death and injuries.
To what end? To blame an inanimate object for the actions of the person
using it?
> * I back evidence-based policies.
Then when are you going to start doing so:?
I would note that all your issues, arguments, and questions were asked and
addressed by SCOTUS. I suggest you read their ruling which will provide you
with cites, references and sources for further research and proof of what
you're asking to see as far as the application of the 2nd Amendment to the
individual right to keep and bear arms for non-military uses.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html
You asked for good contrary evidence. I've now supplied it. Until you can
refute the information contained with the ruling by SCOTUS I will consider
your views refuted.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 21 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 19 20 [21] 22 23 … 29 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web