Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #687921 > unrolled thread
| Started by | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 02:37 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-06-03 09:06 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 578 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 02:37 -0400
Re:Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-31 09:16 +0200
Re: Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 03:51 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 12:06 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 15:49 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 20:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 16:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 19:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 21:38 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 08:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 22:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-05-31 19:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-31 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 03:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 08:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 11:59 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Slaughtering concert goers. ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 14:07 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 18:50 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:00 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:29 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:47 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:18 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 09:14 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:48 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:28 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:14 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-02 08:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 12:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 04:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:12 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:14 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:19 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:54 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
The Supreme Court got it wrong. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:51 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:59 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:25 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:28 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:08 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 23:24 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:12 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:48 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:00 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:32 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:49 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:45 -0700
Permission to breath ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:13 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Earle Jones <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2018-06-02 20:36 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:53 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 23:33 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:42 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:57 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:08 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Clarity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-03 08:52 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:46 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:53 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 22:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 23:19 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 09:10 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:31 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:12 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:26 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:10 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 22:19 -0500
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 00:24 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 05:43 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 07:17 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 16:07 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:30 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 01:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:34 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:50 -0700
"Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 19:02 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:49 -0700
Depressed Losers, slaughtering consert goers, is "natural" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 02:18 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:25 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:16 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-02 01:20 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-03 20:11 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 00:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:30 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 17:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 15:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-04 23:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:51 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:51 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:27 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 08:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:32 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:17 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 05:15 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:07 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 06:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:28 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:19 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:23 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 22:09 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:48 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:44 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-04 02:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 20:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:00 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:39 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 15:20 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-05 22:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 20:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:29 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:16 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 06:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:30 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:13 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:41 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 02:29 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:50 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:38 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 12:55 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-05 14:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 12:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 14:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-05 22:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:46 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:55 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-09 02:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 23:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 06:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:50 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 09:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 10:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-10 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 13:42 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 17:31 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 23:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Truth Avoidance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Truth Avoidance. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 21:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 18:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 17:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 02:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-07 05:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 22:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 11:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:17 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:36 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:29 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 11:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 14:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:12 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:59 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 19:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 20:21 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:58 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500
Re: Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! Dave Zeeman <arougroutinette@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 09:06 -0700
Page 11 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 29 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 12:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <bau60m.v7p.17.22@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #688509 |
On 2018-06-03 12:38 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 12:33 PM, % wrote: > ... >>>>> I prefer to stick to the evidence and supportable data. >>>>> >>>> none of this will raise your income >>> >>> Actually sticking to evidence and supportable data helps my income. :) >>> >> no it does it just makes you look completely dominated by the person >> you're complaining about > > Who am I complaining about? I merely am noting some simple facts: > > * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much > exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed > action". > > * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of > the country which were never, as far as I can find, > challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it > a hard sale to say they were against the second > amendment. > > * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported > the states rights view. > > * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from > mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun > laws. > > * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on > arms... what one could call "infringements". > > * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as > we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything > else that is tied to death and injuries. > > * I back evidence-based policies. > > now you're complaining to me about what you are complaining about , i'm not telling you to change how you are i'm just saying how it looks
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 13:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnj0huFm0j7U13@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688510 |
On 6/3/18 12:44 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-03 12:38 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/3/18 12:33 PM, % wrote: >> ... >>>>>> I prefer to stick to the evidence and supportable data. >>>>>> >>>>> none of this will raise your income >>>> >>>> Actually sticking to evidence and supportable data helps my income. :) >>>> >>> no it does it just makes you look completely dominated by the person >>> you're complaining about >> >> Who am I complaining about? I merely am noting some simple facts: >> >> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >> action". >> >> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >> a hard sale to say they were against the second >> amendment. >> >> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >> the states rights view. >> >> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >> laws. >> >> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >> arms... what one could call "infringements". >> >> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >> else that is tied to death and injuries. >> >> * I back evidence-based policies. >> > now you're complaining to me about what you are complaining about , > i'm not telling you to change how you are i'm just saying how it looks I am noting those simple facts and when people deny them I support them. But not really interested in the meta-debate you are pushing. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 13:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <bau7ui.2al.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #688513 |
On 2018-06-03 1:14 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 12:44 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-06-03 12:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/3/18 12:33 PM, % wrote: >>> ... >>>>>>> I prefer to stick to the evidence and supportable data. >>>>>>> >>>>>> none of this will raise your income >>>>> >>>>> Actually sticking to evidence and supportable data helps my income. :) >>>>> >>>> no it does it just makes you look completely dominated by the person >>>> you're complaining about >>> >>> Who am I complaining about? I merely am noting some simple facts: >>> >>> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >>> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >>> action". >>> >>> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >>> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >>> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >>> a hard sale to say they were against the second >>> amendment. >>> >>> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >>> the states rights view. >>> >>> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >>> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >>> laws. >>> >>> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >>> arms... what one could call "infringements". >>> >>> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >>> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >>> else that is tied to death and injuries. >>> >>> * I back evidence-based policies. >>> >> now you're complaining to me about what you are complaining about , >> i'm not telling you to change how you are i'm just saying how it looks > > I am noting those simple facts and when people deny them I support them. > > But not really interested in the meta-debate you are pushing. > well then lets fix it so you don't do it here
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 13:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnj0upFm0isU17@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688514 |
On 6/3/18 1:17 PM, % wrote: ... >> But not really interested in the meta-debate you are pushing. >> > well then lets fix it so you don't do it here How about we get back to the topic? * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed action". * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of the country which were never, as far as I can find, challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it a hard sale to say they were against the second amendment. * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun laws. * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on arms... what one could call "infringements". * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything else that is tied to death and injuries. * I back evidence-based policies. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 16:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <atu8hdlniqc559rod7tirs8o4lokfur66t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688500 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 12:04:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/3/18 11:53 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:38:43 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/3/18 11:12 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> ... >>>>> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >>>>> >>>>> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >>>>> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >>>>> action". >>>> >>>> It certainly can mean that. >>> >>> And it is pretty much exclusively >> >> But not 100%. So your argument is useless. > >It is of great use to those who want to understand the meaning It's of no use. >> No meanings are twisted here, except by gun grabbing leftists. > >Who said anything about "gun grabbing"? Not I! Nobody said you did. >Why do you move goal posts like that? It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. You know that. >I have spoken of your twisting of the meaning.. TRANSLATION: "No, I cannot argue "right of the people" because I just don't understand it. >> Just your paranoid fantasies. > >See: you deny facts You have no facts, just fantasy. >>>> Nobody is against research. >>> >>> <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2595514> >> >> Nobody is against research. Most normal people know it shouldn't be >> done by the Center for DISEASE Control, since it's not a disease. > >Many of the things listed there are not diseases Thanks for admitting that we need to curtail ANY studies the CDC does that are NOT disease. Being against government bloat is good. >> Well, actually, they're not. Your "research" argument is a prime >> example of leftist lies and bullshit. >> >> Your "NRA Controls The Government" bullshit is a close second. >> >> etc etc etc. >> >> [yawn] >> >I do not back your emotional-charged views You only back your own. Fair enough.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 16:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnjd0aFpochU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688551 |
On 6/3/18 4:40 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 12:04:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 6/3/18 11:53 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:38:43 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/3/18 11:12 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >>>>>> >>>>>> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >>>>>> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >>>>>> action". >>>>> >>>>> It certainly can mean that. >>>> >>>> And it is pretty much exclusively >>> >>> But not 100%. So your argument is useless. >> >> It is of great use to those who want to understand the meaning > > It's of no use. To you because it does not fit your bias. Sure. For those of us who want to gain an understanding with limited bias, however, it is of value. Sure. >>> No meanings are twisted here, except by gun grabbing leftists. >> >> Who said anything about "gun grabbing"? Not I! > > Nobody said you did. So why bring whomever these people are? >> Why do you move goal posts like that? > > It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. You > know that. We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply not true. >> I have spoken of your twisting of the meaning.. > > TRANSLATION: Speak for yourself. > "No, I cannot argue "right of the people" because I just > don't understand it. Good you admit you do not understand it. >>> Just your paranoid fantasies. >> >> See: you deny facts > > You have no facts, just fantasy. Here are the facts you reject. Happy to support any of them. * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed action". * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of the country which were never, as far as I can find, challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it a hard sale to say they were against the second amendment. * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun laws. * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on arms... what one could call "infringements". * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything else that is tied to death and injuries. * I back evidence-based policies. >>>>> Nobody is against research. >>>> >>>> <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2595514> >>> >>> Nobody is against research. Most normal people know it shouldn't be >>> done by the Center for DISEASE Control, since it's not a disease. >> >> Many of the things listed there are not diseases > > Thanks for admitting that we need to curtail ANY studies the CDC does > that are NOT disease. Ah, more word twisting on your part. * The CDC has a mandate to do more than just look at diseases. * The research looked at was not just CDC funded research. > Being against government bloat is good. Change of topic noted. >>> Well, actually, they're not. Your "research" argument is a prime >>> example of leftist lies and bullshit. >>> >>> Your "NRA Controls The Government" bullshit is a close second. >>> >>> etc etc etc. >>> >>> [yawn] >>> >> I do not back your emotional-charged views > > You only back your own. Fair enough. While I do not deny I have emotion, clearly my argument is based far more on evidence than it is emotion. I use strong evidence. Your empty denials are of little value. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 16:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <baukqh.cup.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #688554 |
On 2018-06-03 4:47 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 4:40 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 12:04:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/3/18 11:53 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:38:43 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/3/18 11:12 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>>>> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >>>>>>> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >>>>>>> action". >>>>>> >>>>>> It certainly can mean that. >>>>> >>>>> And it is pretty much exclusively >>>> >>>> But not 100%. So your argument is useless. >>> >>> It is of great use to those who want to understand the meaning >> >> It's of no use. > > To you because it does not fit your bias. Sure. For those of us who want > to gain an understanding with limited bias, however, it is of value. Sure. > >>>> No meanings are twisted here, except by gun grabbing leftists. >>> >>> Who said anything about "gun grabbing"? Not I! >> >> Nobody said you did. > > So why bring whomever these people are? > >>> Why do you move goal posts like that? >> >> It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. You >> know that. > > We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply > not true. > >>> I have spoken of your twisting of the meaning.. >> >> TRANSLATION: > > Speak for yourself. > >> "No, I cannot argue "right of the people" because I just >> don't understand it. > > Good you admit you do not understand it. > >>>> Just your paranoid fantasies. >>> >>> See: you deny facts >> >> You have no facts, just fantasy. > > Here are the facts you reject. Happy to support any of them. > > * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much > exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed > action". > > * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of > the country which were never, as far as I can find, > challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it > a hard sale to say they were against the second > amendment. > > * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported > the states rights view. > > * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from > mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun > laws. > > * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on > arms... what one could call "infringements". > > * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as > we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything > else that is tied to death and injuries. > > * I back evidence-based policies. > >>>>>> Nobody is against research. >>>>> >>>>> <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2595514> >>>> >>>> Nobody is against research. Most normal people know it shouldn't be >>>> done by the Center for DISEASE Control, since it's not a disease. >>> >>> Many of the things listed there are not diseases >> >> Thanks for admitting that we need to curtail ANY studies the CDC does >> that are NOT disease. > > Ah, more word twisting on your part. > > * The CDC has a mandate to do more than just look at diseases. > > * The research looked at was not just CDC funded research. > >> Being against government bloat is good. > > Change of topic noted. > >>>> Well, actually, they're not. Your "research" argument is a prime >>>> example of leftist lies and bullshit. >>>> >>>> Your "NRA Controls The Government" bullshit is a close second. >>>> >>>> etc etc etc. >>>> >>>> [yawn] >>>> >>> I do not back your emotional-charged views >> >> You only back your own. Fair enough. > > While I do not deny I have emotion, clearly my argument is based far > more on evidence than it is emotion. I use strong evidence. Your empty > denials are of little value. > > well there i'm glad you got that solved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 17:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnjdoeFpqoiU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688560 |
On 6/3/18 4:57 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-03 4:47 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/3/18 4:40 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 12:04:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/3/18 11:53 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:38:43 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/3/18 11:12 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >>>>>>>> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >>>>>>>> action". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It certainly can mean that. >>>>>> >>>>>> And it is pretty much exclusively >>>>> >>>>> But not 100%. So your argument is useless. >>>> >>>> It is of great use to those who want to understand the meaning >>> >>> It's of no use. >> >> To you because it does not fit your bias. Sure. For those of us who >> want to gain an understanding with limited bias, however, it is of >> value. Sure. >> >>>>> No meanings are twisted here, except by gun grabbing leftists. >>>> >>>> Who said anything about "gun grabbing"? Not I! >>> >>> Nobody said you did. >> >> So why bring whomever these people are? >> >>>> Why do you move goal posts like that? >>> >>> It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. You >>> know that. >> >> We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply >> not true. >> >>>> I have spoken of your twisting of the meaning.. >>> >>> TRANSLATION: >> >> Speak for yourself. >> >>> "No, I cannot argue "right of the people" because I just >>> don't understand it. >> >> Good you admit you do not understand it. >> >>>>> Just your paranoid fantasies. >>>> >>>> See: you deny facts >>> >>> You have no facts, just fantasy. >> >> Here are the facts you reject. Happy to support any of them. >> >> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >> action". >> >> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >> a hard sale to say they were against the second >> amendment. >> >> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >> the states rights view. >> >> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >> laws. >> >> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >> arms... what one could call "infringements". >> >> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >> else that is tied to death and injuries. >> >> * I back evidence-based policies. >> >>>>>>> Nobody is against research. >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2595514> >>>>> >>>>> Nobody is against research. Most normal people know it shouldn't be >>>>> done by the Center for DISEASE Control, since it's not a disease. >>>> >>>> Many of the things listed there are not diseases >>> >>> Thanks for admitting that we need to curtail ANY studies the CDC does >>> that are NOT disease. >> >> Ah, more word twisting on your part. >> >> * The CDC has a mandate to do more than just look at diseases. >> >> * The research looked at was not just CDC funded research. >> >>> Being against government bloat is good. >> >> Change of topic noted. >> >>>>> Well, actually, they're not. Your "research" argument is a prime >>>>> example of leftist lies and bullshit. >>>>> >>>>> Your "NRA Controls The Government" bullshit is a close second. >>>>> >>>>> etc etc etc. >>>>> >>>>> [yawn] >>>>> >>>> I do not back your emotional-charged views >>> >>> You only back your own. Fair enough. >> >> While I do not deny I have emotion, clearly my argument is based far >> more on evidence than it is emotion. I use strong evidence. Your empty >> denials are of little value. >> >> > well there i'm glad you got that solved Thanks! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 17:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <6709hd58fhbuseliu66ot1s0cpeph9kji2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688554 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:47:21 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >To you because it does not fit your bias. Sure. For those of us who want >to gain an understanding with limited bias, however, it is of value. Sure. Of course it has value for you. You're all about trying to define the 2A to your agenda. >>>> No meanings are twisted here, except by gun grabbing leftists. >>> >>> Who said anything about "gun grabbing"? Not I! >> >> Nobody said you did. > >So why bring whomever these people are? > >>> Why do you move goal posts like that? >> >> It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. You >> know that. > >We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply >not true. It's 100% accurate. >* I back evidence-based policies. You like to repeat the same old propaganda. >>>>>> Nobody is against research. >>>>> >>>>> <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2595514> >>>> >>>> Nobody is against research. Most normal people know it shouldn't be >>>> done by the Center for DISEASE Control, since it's not a disease. >>> >>> Many of the things listed there are not diseases >> >> Thanks for admitting that we need to curtail ANY studies the CDC does >> that are NOT disease. > >Ah, more word twisting on your part. LOL That's funny. Gun grabbers *LOVE* to shriek about how gun owners "don't want any research" >* The CDC has a mandate to do more than just look at diseases. > >* The research looked at was not just CDC funded research. > >> Being against government bloat is good. > >Change of topic noted. It's entirely ON topic and one of the REASONs we don't want the CDC to be doing "gun research." >>>> Well, actually, they're not. Your "research" argument is a prime >>>> example of leftist lies and bullshit. >>>> >>>> Your "NRA Controls The Government" bullshit is a close second. >>>> >>>> etc etc etc. >>>> >>>> [yawn] >>>> >>> I do not back your emotional-charged views >> >> You only back your own. Fair enough. > >While I do not deny I have emotion, clearly my argument is based far >more on evidence than it is emotion. I use strong evidence. Your empty >denials are of little value. TRANSLATION: I love my 'facts" but not yours. Example: From one side of their mouths, gun-grabbers will state that almost the entire country wants more gun control; out of the other side of their mouth they'll claim this small NRA lobby somehow "controls" congressional votes. Too funny.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnjehcFq01uU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688562 |
On 6/3/18 5:05 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:47:21 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > > >> To you because it does not fit your bias. Sure. For those of us who want >> to gain an understanding with limited bias, however, it is of value. Sure. > > Of course it has value for you. You're all about trying to define the > 2A to your agenda. What agenda do you even mean? ...>>> It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. You >>> know that. >> >> We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply >> not true. > > It's 100% accurate. Do you deny the existence of gun laws that do not speak of confiscation? ... >> Ah, more word twisting on your part. > > LOL > > That's funny. > > Gun grabbers *LOVE* to shriek about how gun owners "don't want any > research" Why bring up gun grabbers, and if you do join me in wanting research this is a good thing. What are you disagreeing with though? ... > I love my 'facts" but not yours. There are not your facts and mine, there are merely facts. > Example: From one side of their mouths, gun-grabbers will state that > almost the entire country wants more gun control; out of the other > side of their mouth they'll claim this small NRA lobby somehow > "controls" congressional votes. > > Too funny. What gun grabbers and why bring them up? Your ability to focus is quite poor. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <6d59hdprj77p73od0o6gimavj3l2mep23r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688565 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:13:30 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >What agenda do you even mean? Wow. Just wow. You really do have trouble following a thread. >...>>> It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. You >>>> know that. >>> >>> We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply >>> not true. >> >> It's 100% accurate. > >Do you deny the existence of gun laws that do not speak of confiscation? ROFLMAO Are you really this dense? >> LOL >> >> That's funny. >> >> Gun grabbers *LOVE* to shriek about how gun owners "don't want any >> research" > >Why bring up gun grabbers Because there's only two sides to this issue. Gun grabbers are on one side. Americans are on the other. >> I love my 'facts" but not yours. > >There are not your facts and mine, there are merely facts. [chuckle] >> Example: From one side of their mouths, gun-grabbers will state that >> almost the entire country wants more gun control; out of the other >> side of their mouth they'll claim this small NRA lobby somehow >> "controls" congressional votes. >> >> Too funny. > >What gun grabbers You're really having trouble with this concept, aren't you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnjjkqFqq66U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688565 |
Klaus snipped a lot so responding to my own post where the context is still here. On 6/3/18 5:13 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 5:05 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:47:21 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> To you because it does not fit your bias. Sure. For those of us who want >>> to gain an understanding with limited bias, however, it is of value. >>> Sure. >> >> Of course it has value for you. You're all about trying to define the >> 2A to your agenda. > > What agenda do you even mean? Klaus could not name any agenda at all. Turns out he made that up to troll me. > ...>>> It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. You >>>> know that. >>> >>> We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply >>> not true. >> >> It's 100% accurate. > > Do you deny the existence of gun laws that do not speak of confiscation? Klaus had no answer to this, only insults. > ... > >>> Ah, more word twisting on your part. >> >> LOL >> >> That's funny. >> >> Gun grabbers *LOVE* to shriek about how gun owners "don't want any >> research" > > Why bring up gun grabbers, and if you do join me in wanting research > this is a good thing. What are you disagreeing with though? Klaus expressed his black and white world view where there are only "two sides" on this complex issue... and then insisted that ALL Americans are on one side. Completely delusional of him. > ... > >> I love my 'facts" but not yours. > > There are not your facts and mine, there are merely facts. Klaus had nothing of value to add here, and no explanation for his confusion of what a fact even is. >> Example: From one side of their mouths, gun-grabbers will state that >> almost the entire country wants more gun control; out of the other >> side of their mouth they'll claim this small NRA lobby somehow >> "controls" congressional votes. >> >> Too funny. > > What gun grabbers and why bring them up? Your ability to focus is quite > poor. Klaus could not say which gun grabbers he meant, and then twisted things to try to put me on the defensive. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <h06ahdlgvj168lq8i2i4eb41ij7org23jt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688582 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 18:40:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Klaus Snit is now responding to himself. That's a sign.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnl4q6F577rU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688582 |
On 6/3/18 6:40 PM, Snit wrote: > Klaus snipped a lot so responding to my own post where the context is > still here. > > On 6/3/18 5:13 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/3/18 5:05 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:47:21 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> To you because it does not fit your bias. Sure. For those of us who >>>> want >>>> to gain an understanding with limited bias, however, it is of value. >>>> Sure. >>> >>> Of course it has value for you. You're all about trying to define the >>> 2A to your agenda. >> >> What agenda do you even mean? > > Klaus could not name any agenda at all. Turns out he made that up to > troll me. > >> ...>>> It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. >> You >>>>> know that. >>>> >>>> We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply >>>> not true. >>> >>> It's 100% accurate. >> >> Do you deny the existence of gun laws that do not speak of confiscation? > > Klaus had no answer to this, only insults. Klaus still has no answer for this. >> ... >> >>>> Ah, more word twisting on your part. >>> >>> LOL >>> >>> That's funny. >>> >>> Gun grabbers *LOVE* to shriek about how gun owners "don't want any >>> research" >> >> Why bring up gun grabbers, and if you do join me in wanting research >> this is a good thing. What are you disagreeing with though? > > Klaus expressed his black and white world view where there are only "two > sides" on this complex issue... and then insisted that ALL Americans are > on one side. Completely delusional of him. Klaus had no comment on this. >> ... >> >>> I love my 'facts" but not yours. >> >> There are not your facts and mine, there are merely facts. > > Klaus had nothing of value to add here, and no explanation for his > confusion of what a fact even is. Klaus has no comment on this. >>> Example: From one side of their mouths, gun-grabbers will state that >>> almost the entire country wants more gun control; out of the other >>> side of their mouth they'll claim this small NRA lobby somehow >>> "controls" congressional votes. >>> >>> Too funny. >> >> What gun grabbers and why bring them up? Your ability to focus is >> quite poor. > > Klaus could not say which gun grabbers he meant, and then twisted things > to try to put me on the defensive. Klaus has no comment on this. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <kiiRC.382342$nq5.146881@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #688488 |
On 6/3/2018 2:03 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 4:02 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 18:53:02 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/2/18 6:25 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> >>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something >>>>>>>>>>> like seven different versions of the second amendment with >>>>>>>>>>> different commas and capitalization. >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>> >>>>>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>> >>>>>>>> Correct. >>>> >>>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get >>>>>>> to a point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase >>>>>>> is not there this means the concept of what the states can do (what >>>>>>> they have rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did >>>>>>> you have a broader point? >>>> >>>>>> No, you're not even close. >>>> >>>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>> >>>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>>> >>>> It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. >>>> Now show us your hand. >>>> >>>> Oh, right. You already did. >> >> ================================================== >> ================================================== >> ================= WARNING! ======================== >> GOAL POST MOVES AHEAD! >> ================= WARNING! ======================== >> ================================================== >> ================================================== >> >> >>> Well, the SCOTUS also talked of limits,[..] >> >> People's right. Got anything else? >> > Sure. Things such as the actual meaning of the words / phrases, the > dislike of judicial activism, etc. > > Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: > > * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much > exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed > action". Self-defense is "armed action". > * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of > the country which were never, as far as I can find, > challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it > a hard sale to say they were against the second > amendment. Because the Second Amendment was not "encorporated" which meant states and cities could pass laws. > * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported > the states rights view. Supreme court settled the issue (also civil war) > * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from > mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun > laws. Utter garbage and hate propaganda. NRA does not benefit from Mass shootings. Leftists seeking legislation for public disarmament benefit from public responses to shootings. NRA benefits from leftist efforts to repeal bill of rights and citizen resistance to that effort which scares honest gun owners into memberships and donations. THank you SNIT. > * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on > arms... what one could call "infringements". There are limits given by the definition of the right. But those limitations are not the arbitrary tyranny of government permission that you are promoting. > * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as > we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything > else that is tied to death and injuries. Everyone is for more and better real science. However when those with a political agenda produce pseudoscience papers to further their political agendas trying to use public respect for science by producing junk science propaganda, science and the public are the losers. > * I back evidence-based policies. Everyone backs evidence-based policies. Too bad there s so little of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnlu8lFa432U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688740 |
On 6/4/18 2:37 PM, benj wrote: ... >> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >> >> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >> action". > > Self-defense is "armed action". If you can give a good reason why we should ignore the way the term "bear arms" was used at the time of the writing of the constitution I would love to hear it. If not I think we should stick with that meaning. >> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >> a hard sale to say they were against the second >> amendment. > > Because the Second Amendment was not "encorporated" which meant states > and cities could pass laws. And they still can. Sure. >> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >> the states rights view. > > Supreme court settled the issue (also civil war) The civil war has little to do with this, but, sure, the activist judges on the Supreme Court pushed a redefinition which IS law in a 5:4 decision. I do get that. It is not in dispute. Not sure why you mention it. >> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >> laws. > > Utter garbage and hate propaganda. NRA does not benefit from Mass > shootings. Leftists seeking legislation for public disarmament benefit > from public responses to shootings. NRA benefits from leftist efforts to > repeal bill of rights and citizen resistance to that effort which scares > honest gun owners into memberships and donations. THank you SNIT. Your denial of simple facts, which I offered strong support for in a recent post, is not of any value. Nor is your name calling and insults -- your feelings of wanting to put others down to feel better about yourself is not of interest to me. >> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >> arms... what one could call "infringements". > > There are limits given by the definition of the right. But those > limitations are not the arbitrary tyranny of government permission that > you are promoting. I am promoting evidence-based policy. Can you explain why you think that is a bad thing? >> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >> else that is tied to death and injuries. > > Everyone is for more and better real science. However when those with a > political agenda produce pseudoscience papers to further their political > agendas trying to use public respect for science by producing junk > science propaganda, science and the public are the losers. I am not interested in conspiracy theories. >> * I back evidence-based policies. > > Everyone backs evidence-based policies. > Too bad there s so little of it. Above you claim my support for evidence-based policies is "arbitrary tyranny of government permission". Here you seem to back it. Can you explain? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <5ki7hd9qi6e8enuta128vd0ecak1eun58a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688378 |
On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:03 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>>>>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>>>>>> and capitalization. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>>>> >>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>> >>>> Correct. >>>> >>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>> broader point? >> >> No, you're not even close. >> >> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >> right, not the feds' right. >> > >That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. That's what it says, if you're capable of reading.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fniop0Fm0isU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688450 |
On 6/3/18 4:01 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:03 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>>>>>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>>>>>>> and capitalization. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>>>>> >>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>>> >>>>> Correct. >>>>> >>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>> broader point? >>> >>> No, you're not even close. >>> >>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>> right, not the feds' right. >>> >> >> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. > > That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. > Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! Thanks! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <7tb8hddejo1m6gcjd1h9ba7868hpgu9t01@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688487 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:02:08 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/3/18 4:01 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:03 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>>>>>>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>>>>>>>> and capitalization. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>>>> >>>>>> Correct. >>>>>> >>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>>> broader point? >>>> >>>> No, you're not even close. >>>> >>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>> >>> >>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >> >> That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. >> >Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! No, it's the old "It is because that's what it says." I don't care if you're convinced.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fniqvoFm0isU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688491 |
On 6/3/18 11:13 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>>>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>>>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>>>> broader point? >>>>> No, you're not even close. >>>>> >>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>>> >>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>> That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. >>> >> Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! > No, it's the old "It is because that's what it says." I don't care if > you're convinced. You are welcome to have an unsupported opinion. It is not as though you owe me or anyone else an explanation. Just do not expect me to be convinced by your emotion. I tend to stick to evidence on such matters. * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed action". * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of the country which were never, as far as I can find, challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it a hard sale to say they were against the second amendment. * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun laws. * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on arms... what one could call "infringements". * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything else that is tied to death and injuries. * I back evidence-based policies. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 29 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web